[0001] The present invention generally relates to the collection of airborne particulates
such as dust, pollen, fumes, or powders using filters. More particularly, the invention
relates to the use of a bipolar charging device to enhance the collection efficiency
and dust loading capacity of the media filters.
[0002] Filters have been used in cleaning air for centuries. The collection efficiency of
a filter depends on many parameters, such as the fiber diameter, the filter's packing
density, filter thickness, particle diameter, air flow velocity, etc.
[0003] In order to increase the efficiency in the removal of fine particles from the air
at a given operating velocity, either smaller fiber diameter, thicker fiber bed, higher
packing density, or a combination of the above approaches can be applied. All tend
to increase the pressure drop across the filter. Thus, as a general rule in fibrous
(and fabric) filtration, the higher the efficiency of the filter, the higher the pressure
loss it has. Such a high pressure loss in turn means a more restrictive air flow,
or a higher operation cost if a certain flow rate must be maintained.
[0004] Electrically charged fibers can attract airborne particulates toward a fiber surface
without altering any mechanical characteristics of the filter. Thus, electrical forces
can enhance the filter efficiency without increasing the pressure drop across the
filter. By charging a filter, higher efficiency at lower pressure drop, higher dust
loading capacity, more air flow rate, and less maintenance can be achieved. Because
of these advantages, many studies on electrical enhancement in filter performance
have been made in the past several years.
[0005] Electrical forces can be used to enhance the capture efficiency of fibrous filters
in several ways. An electrical field can be produced in a filter by (1) charging the
fiber elements, (2) charging the airborne particles, or (3) applying an electric field
across the fiber elements. Examples of filters with charged fiber elements are the
Hansen filters and Electret filters (U.S. Patent 4,178,157). As early as 1930, Hansen
found a marked improvement in collecting submicron particles when a wool filter pad
was powdered with ground colophony resins. The mechanisms are mainly electrical. Resin
particles, about 1 micron in diameter, are scattered over the surface of the wool
fibers of 20 microns in diameter. The particles, negatively charged by contact and
friction, maintain the charge because of high resistivity of the resin, and thus charge
the filters.
[0006] The Electret filters are made of corona-charged split fibers of polypropylene. A
polypropylene film is charged by two opposite charged corona devices, one on each
side of the foil, before fibrillation. Electret fibers obtained this way have a rectangular
cross section and become permanently charged dielectrics. The Electret filters capture
charged and uncharged particles by Coulomb force and forces on induced dipoles in
particles, respectively. However, the Electret filters have a tendency to lose the
charge effect at high humidity and temperature environments. Test results also showed
that they became ineffective when the fiber surfaces are coated with deposits which
shield off the charges.
[0007] The method of charging the particles and then removing-them by fibrous filters has
been studied. The particles are charged by corona discharge before passing through
the fibrous filters. The charged particle is then attracted toward an uncharged surface
inside the filter by the image force and thus enhancing the efficiency. However, as
the charges are built up on the fiber surface, the Coulomb force between the charges
on the fibers and charges on the airborne particles is a repelling force because they
are of the same polarity, which causes the particle trajectory to move away from the
fiber surface. The net result is a decrease in the collection efficiency.
[0008] The use of an externally applied electric field to enhance the filter efficiency
has been investigated by Iinoya and Makino. By placing a fiber in an electric field,
the fiber is polarized and the electric field in the space around the fiber becomes
nonuniform. An uncharged particle in the nonuniform field will also be polarized and
experience a force toward the fiber. If the particles are electrically charged, there
are forces acting on the charges of the particles by the electric field as well as
image forces between the charged particles and fibers. All would increase the efficiency
of the filters. The electric field applied across the filter usually is achieved by
metal mesh screens positioned upstream and downstream of the filter, one powered to
a high voltage and the other grounded. Voltage gradient of more than 15 or 20 kv/inch
is necessary in order to have a significant enhancement effect. But this particular
design can not collect conductive type particles, because a current leakage or short-circuit
can develop very quickly.
[0009] The magnitude of the electrical forces can be significantly large. For example, the
electrical force acting on a 1 micron particle, carrying 100 electrons, by an electric
field of 25 kv/inch in strength, is 3,118 times as much as the gravitational force
acting on the particle. Fibrous filters with electrical augmentation can therefore
perform at much higher level of efficiency than the conventional fibrous filters.
SUMMARY
[0010] An embodiment of the present invention uses bipolar charged media filters to achieve
high collection efficiency and high dust loading capacity with a low pressure drop
across the filter. Preferably, an ionizer with two rows of ionizing wires is used,
wherein each row is connected to a positive and a negative DC output power supply,
respectively. The two power supplies are activated alternately with respect to one
another. Power alternation is controlled by a repeated cycle time relay with adjustable
time intervals. A media filter may be located downstream of the ionizer. The filter
can be a pleated bag filter, or a 2" or 4" panel filter, or other configuration filter,
but the electrical resistance of the filter material should preferably be high, so
that it will retain electrical charges on its fiber surfaces. Filter media made of
plastic materials such as polypropylene or glass fibers are examples of desirable
filters with high dielectric strength for this invention.
[0011] Preferably, at any given time of operation, only one row of the ionizing wires is
powered. For example, if the positive power supply is being activated at one moment,
all airborne particles going through the ionizer are charged positively. As they continue
to go through the media filter, most of these positively charged particles will be
captured by the media filter. The charges are retained on the fiber surface due to
the high resistivity of the fiber material and in turn charge the filter media positively.
These positive charges keep on building up during the positive cycle. When the positive
cycle expires and the repeat cycle time relay kicks in the negative power supply,
the ionizer is now in a negative ionization cycle and charges the particles negatively.
These negatively charged particles will experience a strong attraction (Coulomb force)
toward the positively charged fiber surface, thus greatly enhancing the efficiency.
The two cycles repeat themselves to create a permanent bipolar charging effect for
the filter. A high collection efficiency using a low pressure drop filter is thus
achieved. The dust loading capacity of this invention is also much higher than the
same filter without the bipolar charging effect.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0012] The present invention will now be described in more detail with reference to preferred
embodiments of the present invention, given only by way of example, and illustrated
in the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a bipolar charged filter according to the present
invention.
Fig. 2 is a view from the top of a bipolar charged filter unit.
Fig. 3 is a front view of the bipolar charged filter shown in Fig. 2, with both the
power supply compartment and the access door removed.
Fig. 4 is a top view of the preferred bipolar charged ionizer.
Fig. 5 is a cross section view taken on line AA of Fig. 4.
Fig. 6 is a cross section view taken on line BB of Fig. 4.
Fig. 7 is a view illustrating the use of two identical single row ionizers in achieving
the bipolar charge effect.
Fig. 8 is a chart illustrating a pressure drop comparison between the same type bag
filters with and without the bipolar charge mechanism.
Fig. 9 is a chart illustrating an air flow rate comparison between the same type bag
filters with and without the bipolar charge mechanism.
Fig. 10 is a chart illustrating a DOP collection efficiency comparison between the
same type bag filters with and without the bipolar charge mechanism.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0013] Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of the elements used in the bipolar charged filter
of the present invention.
[0014] A conventional prefilter 3 may be arranged upstream and used to intercept large size
particles. It is typical in an air cleaning system to install a prefilter to prevent
the main filtering system from being overloaded prematurely. Fine particles, e.g.,
less than 5 microns in diameter, usually pass through the crude prefilter and enter
the ionizer 1.
[0015] The ionizer 1 includes two rows of ionizing wires 47, 48, one being connected to
a positive output high voltage DC power supply 5 and the other to a negative output
high voltage DC power supply 4, respectively. These two sets of ionizing wires 47,
48 are preferably not powered simultaneously. Instead, a repeated cycle time relay
6 is used to control the cycle time of both the positive and negative ionizations.
Adjusting knobs 11 and 12 are used to set the cycle times for both the positive and
negative power supplies. The cycles can be continued indefinitely until the input
power to the relay 6 is cut off.
[0016] As an alternative embodiment, a single ionizer, or set of ionizing wires, may be
used together with a high voltage relay. The relay will alternately connect the single
set of ionizing wires to the positive high voltage source 5 and the negative high
voltage source 4.
[0017] Another alternative embodiment uses a single ionizer, or set of ionizing wires, and
a single high voltage power source. The high voltage power source can be configured
to alternately emit a positive high voltage and a negative high voltage.
[0018] A pleated bag filter 2 is placed downstream of the ionizer 1 to collect the particles.
It should be noted that any media filters, preferably those made of high dielectric
strength material, can be used in this invention regardless the size, shape and configuration
of the filter. For example, the filter 2 can be a panel filter or a cylindrical cartridge
filter. The filter material can be polypropylene, polyethylene, or any other material
with good dielectric strength.
[0019] The fibrous bag filter 2 initially may not carry any electronic charges in this system.
However, as the power is turned on, either the negative power supply 4 or the positive
power supply 5 is energized first.
[0020] For this description, it is assumed that the negative power supply 4 is energized
first. Energization of the negative power supply 4 creates negative ions in high concentration
(about 10 to 100 millions per cubic centimeter) in the ionizer 1. Airborne particles
passing through the ionizer are thus charged negatively. These negatively charged
particles 7 will be collected by the bag filter 2 by mechanical collection mechanisms
such as inertia impaction, interception, diffusion as well as by the electrical image
force.
[0021] The electric charges are sustained on the deposited particles due to the high electrical
resistance of the fibers. The charges in turn charge the fibers negatively. This negative
charging process continues until the time relay 6 kicks in the positive power supply
5 and shuts down the negative power supply 4. As soon as this power alternation happens,
particles passing through the ionizer 1 are then charged positively. These positively
charged particles 8 react to the negatively charged fiber surfaces of the bag filter
2 by the Coulomb force. This reaction enhances significantly the collection efficiency
of the bag filter 2.
[0022] The collection efficiency of a 40% bag filter was increased to 99% by this effect
in the test. The collection of the positively charged particles 8 on the negatively
charged bag filter 2 tends to neutralize the net charge of the bag filter 2 to an
extent. However, the two charge cycles can be set at different intervals. For example,
the negative power cycle can be set for a period that is twice as long as the positive
power cycle (or vice versa), so that the negative charges generated on the fiber surfaces
are sufficiently more than the positive charges (or vice versa). In this situation,
the bag filter 2 will consistently maintain a net negative (or positive) charge status
throughout the operation.
[0023] Fig. 2 is a top view of a filtration system utilizing the bipolar charged filter
of the present invention. It shows sequentially in the air flow direction (arrow A),
the prefilter 3, the bipolar charge ionizer 1, the pleated bag filter 2, a motor 18,
a blower 19, and an exhaust grill 20. These elements may be installed in a metal cabinet
13. A power supply and electrical control compartment 28 may be mounted behind an
access door 52, which can be opened to service the prefilter 3, the ionizer 1, and
the bag filter 2. Inside the compartment 28 are power supplies 27, power indicating
lights 24 and 26, a time relay 23, a main switch 25, and other accessories necessary
to provide a complete system. Latches 30 are used to lock the access door 52 to the
cabinet. Another access door 21 is provided to service the blower section. The blower
system shown is driven by belt 22. However, a direct drive type of blower also can
be used. An electrical wiring box 17 is used to connect the system to a power source.
The high voltage outputs are connected from the power supplies to the bipolar ionizer
1 through two high voltage contacts 29.
[0024] Fig. 3 is a front view of the same bipolar charged filter unit with the access doors
and the power supply compartment removed, giving a clear view of the prefilter 3,
the bipolar ionizer 1, the charged bag filter 2, the motor 18 and the blower in the
cabinet. Both the motor 18 and the blower 19 are mounted to the cabinet by bolts and
nuts 31, 32. Electrical wires 33 are to be connected to the power supply and electrical
control compartment for proper control and operation.
[0025] Fig. 4 shows a top view of the bipolar ionizer. Four corner braces 35 are used to
hold the structure of the ionizer 1. Ground plates 41 are riveted to the braces 35.
High voltage insulators 36 are used to hold the ionizing wire supports 39 and 40.
The insulators 36 are secured to the braces 35 by screws 38. There are two rows of
ionizing wires 47, 48.
[0026] Fig. 5 is section on line AA of Fig. 4, showing one of the sets of ionizing wires
47, 48. The top and bottom ionizing wire supports 40, 46 and 39, 54 hold the ionizing
wires 47, 48 in position.
[0027] The ionizing wires 47, 48 are preferably fine tungsten wires about 7 to 10 mil in
diameter. They are cut to a specified length and coiled to give a spring effect. Crunching
nuts 44 are put at the ends of the wires. One end of each of the ionizing wires 47,
48 is preferably placed into a slot made on the top support 40. The wire is then stretched
to meet the respective slot on the bottom support 46. The spring effect of the coiled
tungsten wire creates a tension that holds the wire in position, typically along a
center line between two adjacent ground plates.
[0028] Alternatively, instead of ionizing wires 47, 48, other corona discharging configurations
may be used. For example, corona discharging surfaces such as sharp needles or spikes
formed on thin sheet metal may be used instead of, or in addition to, ionizing wires.
[0029] When high voltage is applied, the ionizing wires 47, 48 begin to discharge corona
and charge the particles passing through the ionizer 1. The two sets of ionizing wires
47, 48 are separate and independent from each other. As described above, they are
connected to two different power supplies, one positive 5 and the other negative 4
in output and powered in alternate timing with respect to one another to create the
bipolar charge effect.
[0030] Fig. 6 is section on line BB of Fig 4. It shows one of the ground plates 41, the
ionizing wires 47, 48, the corner braces 35, insulators 36 holding the ionizing wire
supports 39, 40, 46, 54 and the screws 38 that hold the insulators 36 to the braces
35, and the ionizing wire supports 39, 40, 46, 54 to the insulators 36.
[0031] As shown in Fig. 5, the corner braces 35 are held at each end by end pieces 55. The
end pieces 55 are fastened to the corner braces 35 by bolts 56, or other suitable
means. The ground plates 41 are mounted to the corner braces 35 by plates 42.
[0032] Since the two sets of ionizing wires 47, 48 are independent from each other and connected
to two different power supplies 4, 5, it is possible to use two separate ionizers
to achieve the same purpose, such as shown in Fig. 7. Such arrangement should also
be considered as part of this invention.
TEST RESULTS
[0033] The invention will be further illustrated by the following examples. DOP (dioctyl
phthalate) droplets were generated by an atomizer and challenged the invention device.
The collection efficiency was measured by a Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) 10-Stage
Cascade Impactor (California Measurements, Inc.).
[0034] A fibrous bag filter 18 "W x 18 "L x 12"D was placed in a test duct and its DOP collection
efficiency was measured at an air flow rate of 1150 cfm. Upstream and downstream DOP
concentrations were measured and the collection efficiency was 40%. Then the bipolar
charge ionizer was installed in front of the bag filter. The time relay was set to
give 60 seconds negative and 30 seconds positive power cycles and the power was turned
on. The output voltage and current measured from the negative power supply cycle was
-11.8 kv and -1.8 mA, and 12.2 kv and 1.9 mA from the positive power cycle, respectively.
With the ionizer on, the DOP collection efficiency was increased to 99%. The bipolar
charge effect showed a significant enhancement in the efficiency.
[0035] The effect of the bipolar charge on the loading capacity and pressure drop of the
fibrous filter was then studied. A prototype bipolar charged filter system as that
described in Fig. 2 was used in the study. Flour powders were fed into the system.
The metal mesh prefilter was not able to capture the fine powders and practically
all of the powders went into the ionizer and the bag filter.
[0036] Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 show the pressure drop curves and the air flow rate of two similar
type bag filters, with and without activating the bipolar charge ionizer, respectively.
As seen, the bipolar charged filter showed a smaller increase in pressure drop, more
dust loading, and higher air flow rate. These distinct advantages are largely the
result of electrical deposition.
[0037] More specifically, the electrical forces change the morphology of particle deposition.
Instead of clogging the porosity of the fibrous filter, charged particles deposit
on top of each other and develop a chain-like deposition pattern. These "dendrites"
extend themselves away from the fiber surface, forming fine irregular shape cylinders,
which become very effective collectors themselves and thus greatly enhance the particle
collection efficiency of the filter. However, they cause little pressure drop increase
because they do not clog the porosity among the fibers as much as when the ionizer
is not used.
[0038] The effect of dust loading on the efficiency was also studied. The bipolar charged
filter was placed in the test duct and flour powders fed from upstream at 1100 cfm
one pound at a time. At the end of each pound dust loading, the DOP aerosols were
generated and DOP collection efficiency of the bipolar charge filter measured. The
same test was then repeated for another new bag filter of the same type without the
bipolar charge ionizer. Fig. 10 shows the DOP collection efficiency comparison between
two identical bag filters with and without the bipolar charge effect.
[0039] Table 1 lists the positive and negative cycle voltage, current, and DOP collection
efficiencies up to 10 pounds of powder loading for the bipolar charge filter. Each
DOP efficiency shown is an average of three consecutive samples. The cycle times were
30 seconds positive ionization and 60 seconds negative ionization, respectively. And
Table 2 lists the test result for the bag filter without the bipolar charge ionizer.
As can be seen, the efficiency was maintained very high throughout the load test for
the bipolar charged filter. The pressure drop increased from 0.25 inches of water
at the beginning of the loading test to 2.75 inches of water at the end of 10 pounds
dust loading. In contrast, the DOP efficiency for the conventional bag filter without
the bipolar charge effect was very low at the beginning (41%). Both the pressure drop
and the efficiency increased as the filter was loaded, to 2.5 inches of water and
88%, respectively at the end of 3 pounds of powder loading. However, at the end of
the 4th pound of loading, when the pressure drop measured 4.4 inches of water, the
filter busted open and the test was terminated.
[0040] The ability to run with a very high initial efficiency, maintain at high efficiency
and low pressure drop levels throughout a severe loading, is the unique advantage
of this invention. As a further comparison to another air cleaning technique commonly
used, the electrostatic precipitator (ESP), it is also more advantageous. Because
for an ESP comparable in size, which handles about the same level of air flow rate,
the ESP would have been loaded down by such a heavy loading. The corona current would
have been diminished, and the cake formation in the collecting cell would have caused
short-circuited or arc-over situations. And, the ESP would have to be shut down for
cleaning and maintenance at about one or two pounds loading level.
[0041] Although the present invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments
thereof, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additions, deletions,
modifications, and substitutions not specifically described may be made without departing
from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
TABLE 1
| total dust loading, lb |
positive kv/ma |
negative kv/ma |
DOP efficiency percent |
| 0 |
12.2/1.87 |
-11.8/-1.82 |
99.4% |
| 1 |
13.1/1.24 |
-12.5/-1.51 |
88.9% |
| 2 |
13.1/1.15 |
-12.9/-1.23 |
95.1% |
| 3 |
13.7/0.51 |
-13.3/-0.82 |
95.3% |
| 4 |
13.9/0.28 |
-13.5/-0.53 |
98.1% |
| 5 |
13.9/0.17 |
-13.7/-0.40 |
96.6% |
| 6 |
14.0/0.14 |
-13.8/-0.26 |
97.3% |
| 7 |
13.9/0.28 |
-13.6/-0.45 |
91.2% |
| 8 |
13.9/0.23 |
-13.7/-0.20 |
92.6% |
| 9 |
13.9/0.15 |
-14.1/-0.07 |
94.6% |
| 10 |
13.9/0.14 |
-14.2/-0.06 |
93.6% |
TABLE 2
| total dust loading, lb |
positive kv/ma |
negative kv/m |
DOP efficiency percent |
| 0 |
--- |
--- |
41.1% |
| 1 |
|
|
45.1% |
| 2 |
--- |
--- |
79.2% |
| 3 |
--- |
--- |
88.0% |
| 4 |
--- |
--- |
filter busted open |
1. An electrostatic filter system, comprising:
a filter (2) arranged at a downstream end of said system;
an ioniser (1) arranged upstream of said filter;
a high voltage source (45) connected to said ionizer; and
means for alternating back and forth between a first cycle wherein the ionizer
is activated by a negative high voltage and a second cycle wherein the ionizer is
activated by a positive high voltage.
2. The filter system of claim 1, wherein:
said high voltage source includes a negative high voltage source (4) and a positive
high voltage source (5); and
said ionizer includes a first ionizer that is connected to the negative high voltage
source and a second ionizer that is connected to the positive high voltage source.
3. The filter system of claim 2 wherein the first ionizer is a first set of ionizing
wires (47) and the second ionizer is a second set of ionizing wires (48).
4. The filter system of claim 1, wherein:
said high voltage source includes a negative high voltage source and a positive
high voltage source; and
said alternating means includes means for alternatingly connecting the ionizer
to the negative high voltage source and to the positive high voltage source.
5. The filter system of claim 1, wherein said high voltage source includes a single power
source that can alternatingly output a negative high voltage and a positive high voltage.
6. A bipolar electrostatic filter system, comprising:
a negative high voltage source;
a positive high voltage source;
a filter arranged at a downstream end of said system;
an ionizer arranged upstream of said filter, said ionizer including a first set
of ionizing wires connected to said negative high voltage source and a second set
of ionizing wires connected to said positive high voltage source; and
a cycle time relay to alternatingly activate the first set of ionizing wires with
the negative high voltage source and the second set of ionizing wires with the positive
high voltage source.
7. The filter system of claim 1 or 6, further comprising a prefilter (3) arranged upstream
of the ionizer.
8. The filter system of claim 1 or 6, wherein the filter is a pleated bag filter.
9. The filter system of claim 1 or 6, wherein the filter is a dielectric filter.
10. The filter system of claim 1 or 6, further comprising a blower for moving air through
the ionizer and filter.
11. A method of filtering, comprising the steps of:
moving a fluid to be filtered sequentially through an ionizer and a filter; and
repeatedly cycling back and forth between activating the ionizer with a negative
high voltage for a first period of time and activating the ionizer with a positive
high voltage for a second period of time following said first period of time.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the first period of time is substantially equal to
the second period of time.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein the first period of time is longer than the second
period of time.
14. A method of filtering, comprising the steps of:
arranging a dielectric filter downstream of an ionizer;
moving a fluid to be filtered sequentially through the ionizer and the filter;
negatively charging particulate matter passing through the ionizer during a first
cycle period by activating the ionizer with a negative high voltage;
positively charging particulate matter passing through the ionizer during a second
cycle period by activating the ionizer with a positive high voltage; and
repeatedly cycling back and forth between the first cycle period and the second
cycle period.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the first cycle period is substantially equal to the
second cycle period.
16. The method of claim 14, wherein the first cycle period is longer than the second cycle
period.