(19)
(11) EP 0 501 059 B1

(12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

(45) Mention of the grant of the patent:
29.11.1995 Bulletin 1995/48

(21) Application number: 91306166.9

(22) Date of filing: 08.07.1991
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC)6D21B 1/36, D21C 1/00

(54)

Steam explosion pulping process for papermaking

Aufschlussverfahren durch Dampfexplosion zur Papierherstellung

Procédé de lessivage par explosion à la vapeur pour faire du papier


(84) Designated Contracting States:
GB

(30) Priority: 28.02.1991 CA 2037275

(43) Date of publication of application:
02.09.1992 Bulletin 1992/36

(73) Proprietor: Kokta, Bohuslav Vaclav
Trois-Rivières, Québec G8Y 1B2 (CA)

(72) Inventor:
  • Kokta, Bohuslav Vaclav
    Trois-Rivières, Québec G8Y 1B2 (CA)

(74) Representative: Harrison, David Christopher et al
MEWBURN ELLIS York House 23 Kingsway
London WC2B 6HP
London WC2B 6HP (GB)


(56) References cited: : 
EP-A- 0 172 135
EP-A- 0 487 793
EP-A- 0 284 585
WO-A-87/01402
   
       
    Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention).


    Description


    [0001] This invention relates to a steam explosion pulping process for papermaking.

    [0002] Ingruber et al., Pulp and Paper Manufacture, Volume 4, TAPPI, CPPA, p. 160 (1985) lay down that conventional ultra-high-yield chemithermomechanical or chemimechanical pulping (CTMP/CMP) is preferably conducted at a pH level between 4 and 9, and involves either liquid or vapor phase cooking with sodium sulphite-bisulphite solutions for about 10 to 30 minutes at a temperature between 60 and 175°C. It is generally accepted that the chemical treatment is mainly responsible for permanent fibre softening, increase in long fiber content, fibre specific surface and conformability, as demonstrated by Heitner et al., Pulp and Paper Can., (84)11: T252-T257 (1983).

    [0003] There is another softening approach which consists of a steam treatment of chips at high temperatures followed by explosive decompression.

    [0004] The production of pulp using high-pressure and high steam chip softening well above glass transition temperatures of lignin should theoretically lead to lower energy consumption in subsequent refining stages.

    [0005] The initial research in the field of high-pressure steam cooking, followed by defibration by explosion, was made by Mason, US-A-1 824 221; 2 645 623; 2 494 545; 2 379 8290. The masonite pulp obtained according to a two stage Sprout-Waldron refining procedure showed weak physical strength, dark color and yield loss of 16% to 20%, and revealed itself simply unsuitable for the production of paper according Koran et al., Pulp and Paper Can., 79(3): T107-T-113 (1978). Mamers and al., TAPPI, 64(7): 93-96 (1981); APPITA, 29(5): 356-362 (1976) investigated explosion pulping of pinus elliotti wood chips with the help of high pressure carbon dioxide solutions and bagasse of wheat straw explosion pulping under high pressure of nitrogen. Paper properties which were obtained were similar to that of CTMP/CMP pulps, but at the expense of brightness. The major problem to overcome is oxidation, as well as hydrolytic degradation of fibers leading to brightness and yield loss.

    [0006] It has been suggested by Vit et Kokta, CA-A-1 212 505 (1986) that the ultra-high-yield (90%+) pulp suitable for papermaking can be produced by vapor phase steam explosion cooking. The initial properties of papers made from exploded softwood chips were similar to those of TMP. However, refining energy was about 20% to 25% lower. Recently, a pulping process entitled "Process for Preparing Pulp for Paper Making", Kokta B.V., CA-A-1 230 208; US-A-4 798 651; Can. Pat. Appl. #542 643 (May 1987), referred to as "Steam Explosion Pulping Process" or "S-pulping" has been proposed both for softwoods and hardwoods. In this process, impregnation and cooking conditions were aimed at minimizing yield and brightness loss, maximizing resulting paper properties and decreasing specific refining energy. The steam explosion pulping process consists of the chemical impregnation of chips, short duration saturated steam cooking at temperatures varying from 180°C to 210°C, pressure release, refining and bleaching (if necessary).

    [0007] Kokta et al., Paperi Ja Puu - Paper and Timber, 9, 1044-1055 (1989), have shown that the specific refining energy of aspen explosion pulps is at least 50% lower than that of CMP pulp of similar yield and ionic content level, while paper strength increases by up to 50%. Compared at similar CSF levels, explosion hardwood pulps (i.e. aspen, maple, hardwood mixtures, eucalyptus) at 90% yield provide similar or better paper properties than commercial low yield (ca50%) bleached hardwood pulps.

    [0008] The object of this invention is to provide a process in which additional yield saving and brightness level increase and cost decrease are obtained when compared to the previous invention of Kokta, CA-A-1 230 208 (equivalent to EP-A-284585) by substituting sodium hydroxide with milder swelling agents selected from: a carbonate or bicarbonate of ammonium, an alkaline earth or alkali metal, or magnesium chloride.

    [0009] EP-A-487793, which forms part of the state of the art by virtue of Article 54(3), discloses a process for producing pulp suitable for making paper, which comprised the steps of impregnating wood fragments with an alkaline aqueous liquor including at least one soluble sulphite to provide hydrophylic groups and/or act as an antioxidant, steam cooking the impregnated wood fragments with saturated steam at superatmospheric pressure and at an elevated temperature; subjecting the cooked wood fragments to explosive decompression partially to defibrate same; and refining the softened and defibrated fragments to provide pulp.

    [0010] The reactor is pressurised with cool nitrogen prior to explosive decompression and the liquor generally contains a strong base. Specific mention is made, however, of use of sodium carbonate or bicarbonate as the impregnating agent.

    [0011] The major problems accompanying previous processes using explosive decompression are believed to have been degradation due to the oxidation of wood and acid hydrolysis leading to loss in brightness, deterioration of fiber and paper properties and loss of yield. The approach adopted by this invention is thereto to attempt to curtail hydrolytic and oxidative wood degradation and thereby to protect against loss of yield, brightness and fiber strength. The loss of fiber strength will be particularly great if the degree of polymerisation of the cellulose falls below the critical value which is about 500-600. Hydrolytic degradation will also cause yield lowss due mainly to degradation of hemi-cellulose.

    [0012] The process of this invention tries to achieve a positive improvement in the strength of the paper that will be produced from the fibers by increasing the number of hydrophilic groups on the fiber surfaces thereby adding to the potential sites for hydrogen bonding.

    [0013] The conditions for the achievement of the foregoing objects in accordance with the process of this invention are as follows:

    1) The wood fragments, having fibers suitable for paper making, such as chips, are in a form in which thorough chemical impregnation can be achieved in a reasonable time.

    2) There is an initial thorough impregnation of the chips or other wood fragments by an alkaline aqueous liquor having at least one agent acting to produce hydrophilic groups and as an antioxidant which is capable of protecting the chips against oxidation and develops hydrophilic groups during the cooking stage. The same chemical may act as both an agent to produce hydrophilic groups and as an antioxidant or these functions may be performed by separate chemicals. At the end of cooking the pH should not be lower than about 6.0, so that acids released during cooking will be neutralized. A swelling agent is also used.

    3) The impregnated chips are cooked using saturated steam in the substantial absence of air at high temperature and pressure.

    4) After cooking, the chips that have been steam cooked are subjected to explosive decompression to result in chips which are softened and mostly defibrated.

    5) The defibrated chips are preferably washed and then, without undue delay, and preferably immediately, refined to provide pulp.



    [0014] Claim 1 sets out the conditions in more detail, in particular the choice of swelling agent, which is a mild base. Claim 2 sets out alternative conditions, in which an inert gas is excluded during decompression.

    [0015] The steps of one process of this invention will now be considered in more detail.

    The wood fragments



    [0016] The starting material will normally be chips in which the fibers are of a length suitable for paper making. Shavings could also be used but sawdust would be undesirable except as a minor part of the total furnish as the fibers are partially cut.

    [0017] The chips should also, as is well known, be suitable in the sense of being free from bark and foreign matter.

    [0018] It is desirable for efficiency that coarse chips be avoided as otherwise the subsequent impregnation may deposit chemicals only on the chip surface, unless impregnation is carried out for a very long time. Another problem with coarse chips is that cooking would not be complete. It is best to use shredded or thin chips of a 4-8 mm thickness. It has been found that this process is applicable to hardwoods, jack pine and larch, black spruce, douglas fir giving stronger papers at lower refining energy compared with conventional chemo-thermo mechanical or chemi-mechanical pulping.

    Impregnation



    [0019] The purpose of impregnation is to protect the chips against oxidation during cooking and during transfer from the cooking vessel to the refiner. It is also an objective to provide a positive increase in strength by developing hydrophylic groups on the fiber surface during steam treatment. This will then provide additional sites for hydrogen bonding.

    [0020] The preferred antioxidant is sodium sulphite Na₂SO₃ which also forms hydrophilic groups, and which is available at a low cost. It is used to provide a concentration of absorbed chemical of about 1 to 16% by weight. Concentrations below 4% would be used where brightness protection is unimportant and high strength is not required. Where, however, brightness is important the sodium sulphite should be at least 4%. If physical properties are important these will be improved by using a concentration of at least 4% sodium sulphite and will be further improved as the concentration is further increased towards 16%. The concentration of the solution is preferably about the same as the percentage of chemical to be absorbed where there are equal quantities of chips and liquor. For example, a ton of chips of 50% consistency mixed with one ton of 8% solution will result in about 8% absorbed on the pulp. Thorough impregnation is important so as to distribute the antioxidant evenly rather than depositing it just on the surface. Other antioxidants that can be used are potassium sulphite or magnesium sulphite. Ammonium sulphite could be used if cooking conditions are not severe, or with a buffer. Complexing agents such as ethylene diamine tetracetic acid (EDTA), sodium diethylene triaminepentacetate (DTPA), sodium tripolyphosphate (TPF) and other complexing agents known in the art as being usable under alkaline conditions may be added to minimize the catalytic effect of metals such as iron on oxidative degradation.

    [0021] It is necessary also to use a swelling agent to assist the antioxidant or hydrophilic agent in penetrating the wood and this contributes also to softening the chip. This is of particular value in the case of high density wood. Suitable swelling agents are sodium carbonate or sodium bicarbonate or magnesium carbonate any of which will contribute also to providing hydrophilic groups. Other swelling agents that can be used and which may be desirable as auxiliary swelling agents for high density wood are zinc chloride, sodium chloride, sodium bromide, magnesium chloride, calcium isocyanate, Schweitzers solution, cupriethylenediamne (C.E.D.) tetraethylammonium hydroxide or dimethyldibenzylammonium hydroxide. The concentration of swelling agent and conditions of swelling must be controlled in such a way as to avoid any dissolution of the hollocellulose. Thus the percentage of swelling agent in the impregnating solution will be in the range of about 1 to 4% depending on the agent and the conditions.

    [0022] The impregnating solution must be alkaline and have enough free hydroxyl to be able to neutralize the liberated wood acids such as formic acid and acetic acid. Normally the starting pH is about 7.5 or higher and the final pH after steam cooking should be at least 6 or higher.

    [0023] The time of impregnation at atmospheric pressure in holding tanks typically ranges from about 12 hours to 24 hours at a temperature of about 30°C to 60°C. Approximately equal weights of chips and of aqueous impregnating solution can be used. For industrial purposes, however, the time may be shortened to an hour or to minutes by impregnating with steam under pressure and at a higher temperature. The pressure should be up to about 1 atmospheric extra pressure at a temperature of about 100°C to 110°C. To improve impregnation the chips should be compressed in advance of impregnation in cool solutions of chemicals. Under these conditions, penetration will be achieved in a shorter time. Penetration is what predominantly occurs; there is no significant cooking as evidenced by the fact that there is no significant sulphonic and carboxylic group increase.

    Steam cooking



    [0024] The impregnated chips are steam cooked at a high temperature and pressure.

    [0025] Equipment and methods than can be used for preliminary compacting of the impregnated chips, for cooking the chips with steam and for the discharge of the chips under conditions of explosive decompression and described in CA-A-1 070 537 dated January 29 1980; 1 070 646 dated January 29 1980; 1 119 033 dated March 2 1982 and 1 138 708 dated January 4 1983, all of which were granted to Stake Technology Ltd. The equipment used in the examples was acquired from that company.

    [0026] The temperature of cooking should be within the range of about 180°C to 210°C and preferably within the range 190-200°C, which is in excess of the temperatures considered possible according to the publications of Asplund and Higgins previously referred to. These temperatures correspond with a pressure of 1 MPa (10 atmospheres) for 180°C and 1.6 MPa (15.5 atmospheres) for 200°C. It is these high pressures and temperatures which make a very important contribution to ensuring excellent penetration of the chips by the cooking liquor and results in higher efficience of ionic groups formation on fiber surface.

    [0027] The cooking may be preceded by steam flushing under low pressure steam at 100°C for a short period such as one minute. This is a matter of convenience, in that with a batch reactor the cooking vessel is initially open to the atmosphere, to eliminate air. This air would be disadvantageous in that it would result in oxidation if it were trapped in the cooking vessel. Additional antioxidant may if desired be added at this stage. Steam flushing is desirable with a batch reactor but would not be necessary for a continuous reactor.

    [0028] This preliminary treatment is then followed by cooking for about 30 seconds to 6 minutes and preferably about 1 to 4 minutes.

    [0029] It has been found that within reasonable limits there is a property improvement as a function of the product of time (min) and temperature (°C), which is assigned an arbitrary number. By increasing this from 285 to 760 in the case of black spruce at about the same freeness (157-167) the burst index increased from 3.15 to 4.41 and breaking length from 6.3 to 7.6 and tear from 5.6 to 5.8. Refining energy dropped from 3.2 to 3.1 and brightness dropped from 59.7 to 55.5.

    Explosive decompression



    [0030] After cooking the pressure is instantaneously released and the chips are exploded into a release vessel. If there is to be a delay between release of the chips and refining it is important to cool the chips down by washing them. Washing may also be desirable for the purpose of chemical recovery.

    [0031] It is desirable immediately to refine the chips after explosive decompression. Otherwise, if the chips are stored, some oxidation will occur with resultant loss of brightness. The rapidity with which this will occur depends on how much residual antioxidant is present at that time and on the temperature of the chips and the extent of exposure to oxygen. Preferably, therefore, refining is immediate so that it is unnecessary to incur the cost of excess antioxidant. In any event, undue delay should be avoided. Such delay is regarded as being undue if oxidation takes place to an extent that will materially affect brightness.

    [0032] The chips resulting from the explosive decompression are softened and partially defibrated.

    Refining



    [0033] Refining in the experiments described below standards using an atmospheric laboratory refining was conducted at 2% consistency level using a blender coupled with an energy meter model EW 604.

    [0034] According to A.C. Shaw "Simulation of Secondary Refining" Pulp and Paper Canada 85(6): T152-T155 (1984) the blender results closely match those obtained with industrial refiners. Properties were evaluated after preparing paper sheets according to standard CPPA testing methods.

    [0035] Refining energies are usually low and can be expected to be in the range of 1.7 to 4 MJ/kg, hardwoods, CSF ≡ 100 ml, which is considerably lower than that of conventional CMP and similar to that described in Kokta, CA-A-1 230 208 and US-A-4 798 651.

    [0036] The present invention is described in the enclosed example.

    EXAMPLE


    Chips



    [0037] Freshly cut and naturally grown aspen trees from the Joliette region of Quebec were debarked, chipped and screened at La Station Forestière Duchesnay, Quebec. Average chip size after screening, was as follows: length 2.5 to 3.75 cm; width: 1 to 2 cm; thickness: 1 to 9 mm with maximum distribution at 5 mm.

    Impregnation



    [0038] 150 g of chips (= 50% siccity) were mixed in plastic bags along with 150 g of a solution made up of 8% Na₂SO₃ alone or with 1% of NaOH or MgCl₂ or NaHCO₃ or MgCO₃. Time of impregnation: 24 hours; temperature of impregnation: 60°C. Liquid/chip ratio during impregnation was equal to 3.

    [0039] In addition, 0.5% DTPA was used in applied cooking liquors.

    Cooking



    [0040] Explosion pulps were prepared using vapor phase team cooking of chemically pretreated aspen wood chips at a cooking temperature of 190°C and cooking time 4 minutes.

    [0041] Cooking took place using saturated steam in a laboratory batch reactor built by Stake Tech. Co. Cooking was preceded by one minute steam flushing at atmospheric pressure. After cooking, the pressure was instantaneously released and chips which exploded into the release vessel were washed and cooled down with one liter of tap water, and subsequently refined after being stored in a cold room. The reported amount of steam used for cooking varied from 0.5 to 1 kg of steam for 1 kg of chips. Yield was measured as follows: exploded chips (75 g) were washed with one liter of tap water and subsequently defibrated for 90 seconds in a laboratory blender at 2% consistency. The pulp was washed again with one liter of water, dried at 105°C to constant weight and the resulted weights were compared to the initial O.D. weight of chips.

    Refining



    [0042] Laboratory refining was also done using a domestic blender Osterizer B-8614 at a consistency level of 2%. Defibration and refining energy was measured using a HIOKI model 3181-01 powermeter with an integrator. Relative specific refining energy was calculated by substracted blending energy of fully beated pulp from the total energy needed to defibrate and blend the fiber suspension.

    Property evaluation



    [0043] Paper sheets were prepared and tested according to standard CPPA testing methods on 1.2 g sheets. Brightness (Elrepho) was evaluated on sheets made with deinosized water. Ionic content (sulfonate and carboxylate ions) was determined by means of conductometric titration.

    Bleaching



    [0044] Bleaching was carried out using 2% of hydrogen peroxide, 2% NaOH; 0.05% of MgSO₄; 2% of sodium silicate; 0.5% DTPA; pulp concentration: 20%; bleaching time: 2 hours; bleaching temperature: 80°C; neutralization with Na₂S₂O₅ to pH = 5.5; washing with de-ionized water.

    [0045] In Figures 1 to 4, the paper properties of improved steam explosion process are compared to that of an explosion process as defined in Kokta, CA-A-230 208 (1987) and Kokta, US-A-4 798 651 (1989) using either 8% Na₂SO₃ or 8% Na₂SO₃ + 1% NaOH.

    [0046] It is evident from Figure 1 that substituting 1% NaOH with 1% of MgCl₂ or 1% NaHCO₃ resulted in 3% pulp yield increase. Furthermore, this increment was 6% when 1% MgCO₃ was used.

    [0047] The effect of chemical pre-treatment on brightness is shown in Figure 2. It shows, in the shaded blocks, that brown stock brightness increases from 59.9% of that obtained with 8% Na₂SO₃ + 1% NaOH to 64.3%; 65.4%; 64.5% when 1% NaOH is substituted either with 1% of MgCl₂ or NaHCO₃ or MgCO₃. Values shown in outline blocks in that Figure are those of brightness after bleaching.

    [0048] The increase of yield as well as brightness is obtained in the case of NaOH substitution by NaHCO₃ or MgCO₃ without any breaking length lost as demonstrated in Figure 3. On the other hand, a system with MgCl₂ gave lower strength.

    [0049] The results in Figure 4 indicate also that substituting NaOH with either NaHCO₃ or MgCO₃ leads to the same low level of relative specific refining energy. The comparable physical strength as well as relative specific refining energy of the above indicated systems can be explained by similar ionic content as indicated in Figure 5.

    [0050] Therefore the present invention, consisting in substituting NaOH by agents such as carbonates or bicarbonates results not only in the yield and brightness advantage but also in cost decrease.


    Claims

    1. A process for producing pulp suitable for making paper, which comprises the steps of impregnating wood fragments with an alkaline aqueous liquor including at least one soluble sulphite to provide hydrophylic groups and/or act as an antioxidant, steam cooking the impregnated wood fragments with saturated steam at superatmospheric pressure and at an elevated temperature; subjecting the cooked wood fragments to explosive decompression partially to defibrate the same; and refining the softened and defibrated fragments to provide pulp, wherein the liquor comprises magnesium chloride, or a carbonate or bicarbonate of ammonium, of an alkaline earth metal, or of an alkali metal other than sodium as a swelling agent.
     
    2. A process for producing pulp suitable for making paper, which comprises the steps of impregnating wood fragments with an alkaline aqueous liquor including at least one soluble sulphite to provide hydrophylic groups and/or act as an antioxidant, steam cooking the impregnated wood fragments with saturated steam at superatmospheric pressure and at an elevated temperature; subjecting the cooked wood fragments to explosive decompression without previous further pressurisation with cool inert gas partially to defibrate the same; and refining the softened and defibrated fragments to provide pulp, wherein the liquor comprises magnesium chloride, or a carbonate or bicarbonate of ammonium, of an alkaline earth metal, or of an alkali metal as a swelling agent.
     
    3. A process according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the swelling agents are in an amount of 1-4% by weight absorbed by the wood fragments.
     
    4. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the steam cooking is conducted at a cooking temperature in the range of 180°C to 210°C, and the cooking pressure is about 1 MPa (10 atm) to about 1.6 MPa (15.5 atm).
     
    5. A process according to claim 4 wherein the cooking temperature is 190°C to 200°C.
     
    6. A process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the step of impregnation is preceded by the replacement of air with saturated steam.
     
    7. A process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the cooking time is 30 seconds to 6 minutes.
     
    8. A process according to claim 7 wherein the cooking time is 1 minute to 4 minutes.
     
    9. A process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein a small percentage of an auxiliary swelling agent is additionally present during the impregnation step.
     
    10. A process according to claim 8 wherein the auxiliary swelling agent is zinc chloride, sodium chloride, sodium bromide, magnesium chloride, calcium isocyanate, Schweitzers solution, cupriethylenediamine tetraethylammonium hydroxide or dimethyldibenzylammonium hydroxide.
     


    Ansprüche

    1. Verfahren zur Herstellung von zur Papiererzeugung geeignetem Halbstoff, welches die Schritte des Imprägnierens von Holzbruchstücken mit einer wäßrigen alkalischen Flüssigkeit, die zumindest ein lösliches Sulfit enthält, um hydrophile Gruppen zu liefern und/oder als Oxidationshemmer zu wirken, des Dampfkochens der imprägnierten Holzfragmente mit Sattdampf bei Überatmosphärendruck und bei einer erhöhten Temperatur; des Aussetzens der gekochten Holzfragmente einer schlagartigen Druckentlastung, um sie teilweise zu defibrieren; und des Raffinierens der erweichten und defibrierten Fragmente, um Halbstoff zu erhalten, worin die Flüssigkeit Magnesiumchlorid, oder ein Karbonat oder Bikarbonat von Ammonium, von einem Erdalkalimetall oder einem Alkalimetall mit Ausnahme von Natrium als Quellmittel umfaßt.
     
    2. Verfahren zur Herstellung von zur Papiererzeugung geeignetem Halbstoff, welches die Schritte des Imprägnierens von Holzbruchstücken mit einer wäßrigen alkalischen Flüssigkeit, die zumindest ein lösliches Sulfit enthält, um hydrophile Gruppen zu liefern und/oder als Oxidationshemmer zu wirken, des Dampfkochens der imprägnierten Holzfragmente mit Sattdampf bei Überatmosphärendruck und bei einer erhöhten Temperatur; des Aussetzens der gekochten Holzfragmente einer schlagartigen Druckentlastung ohne vorhergehendes weiteres Unter-Druck-Setzen mit kühlem Inertgas, um sie teilweise zu defibrieren; und des Raffinierens der erweichten und defibrierten Fragmente, um Halbstoff zu erhalten, worin die Flüssigkeit Magnesiumchlorid, oder ein Karbonat oder Bikarbonat von Ammonium, von einem Erdalkalimetall oder einem Alkalimetall als Quellmittel umfaßt.
     
    3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, worin die Quellmittel in einer Menge von 1-4 Gew.-% von den Holzfragmenten absorbiert werden.
     
    4. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, worin das Dampfkochen bei einer Kochtemperatur im Bereich von 180°C bis 210°C durchgeführt wird und der Kochdruck etwa 1 MPa (10 atm) bis etwa 1,6 MPa (15,5 atm) beträgt.
     
    5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 4, worin die Kochtemperatur 190°C bis 200°C beträgt.
     
    6. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, worin dem Schritt des Imprägnierens das Ersetzen von Luft durch Sattdampf vorangeht.
     
    7. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, worin die Kochzeit 30 Sekunden bis 6 Minuten beträgt.
     
    8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 7, worin die Kochzeit 1 Minute bis 4 Minuten beträgt.
     
    9. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, worin während des Imprägnierungsschrittes zusätzlich ein kleiner Prozentsatz eines Hilfsquellmittels vorhanden ist.
     
    10. Verfahren nach Anspruch 8, worin das Hilfsquellmittel Zinkchlorid, Natriumchlorid, Natriumbromid, Magnesiumchlorid, Kalziumisocyanat, Schweizers-Reagenz, Kupfer(II)-ethylendiamin-tetraethylammoniumhydroxid oder -dimethyldibenzylammoniumhydroxid ist.
     


    Revendications

    1. Procédé pour produire une pulpe appropriée pour la fabrication de papier, qui comprend les étapes d'imprégnation de fragments de bois avec une liqueur aqueuse alcaline incluant au moins un sulfite soluble pour fournir des groupes hydrophiles et/ou agir en tant qu'antioxydant, cuisson à la vapeur des fragments de bois imprégnés avec de la vapeur saturée à une pression super-atmosphérique et une température élevée; soumission des fragments de bois cuits à une décompression explosive pour défibrer partiellement ceux-ci; et raffinage des fragments adoucis et défibrés pour procurer une pulpe, où la liqueur comprend du chlorure de magnésium, ou un carbonate ou un bicarbonate d'ammonium, d'un métal de terre alcaline, ou d'un métal alcali différent du sodium en tant qu'agent de gonflement.
     
    2. Procédé pour produire une pulpe appropriée pour la fabrication de papier, qui comprend les étapes d'imprégnation de fragments de bois avec une liqueur aqueuse alcaline incluant au moins un sulfite soluble pour fournir des groupes hydrophiles et/ou agir en tant qu'anti-oxydant, cuisson à la vapeur des fragments de bois imprégnés avec de la vapeur saturée à une pression super-atmosphérique et à une température élevée; soumission des fragments de bois cuits à une décompression explosive avec de plus une pressurisation préalable avec un gaz refroidi pour défibrer partiellement ceux-ci; et raffinage des fragments adoucis et défibrés pour fournir une pulpe, où la liqueur comprend du chlorure de magnésium, ou un carbonate ou un bicarbonate d'ammonium, d'un métal de terre alcaline, ou d'un métal alcali en tant qu'agent de gonflement.
     
    3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans lequel les agents de gonflements sont en une quantité de 1 à 4% en poids absorbés par les fragments de bois.
     
    4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, dans lequel la cuisson à la vapeur est menée à une température de cuisson dans l'intervalle de 180°C à 210°C, et la pression de cuisson est d'environ 1 MPa (10 atm) à environ 1,6 MPa (15,5 at).
     
    5. Procédé selon la revendication 4, dans lequel la température de cuisson est de 190°C à 200°C.
     
    6. Procédé selon l'un quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'étape d'imprégnation est précédée par le remplacement de l'air par de la vapeur saturée.
     
    7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le temps de cuisson est de 30 secondes à 6 minutes.
     
    8. Procédé selon la revendication 7, dans lequel le temps de cuisson est d'1 minute à 4 minutes.
     
    9. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel un petit pourcentage d'un agent de gonflement auxiliaire est additionnellement présent pendant l'étape d'imprégnation.
     
    10. Procédé selon la revendication 8, dans lequel l'agent de gonflement auxiliaire est du chlorure de zinc, du chlorure de sodium, du bromure de sodium, du chlorure de magnésium, de l'isocyanate de calcium, une solution de Schweitzers, de l'hydroxyde de cupriéthylènediamine tétraéthylammonium ou de l'hydroxyde de dimethyldibenzylammonium.
     




    Drawing