(19)
(11) EP 0 496 188 B1

(12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

(45) Mention of the grant of the patent:
22.10.1997 Bulletin 1997/43

(21) Application number: 91870011.3

(22) Date of filing: 22.01.1991
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC)6C11D 3/20, C11D 1/66

(54)

Limescale removing composition

Zusammensetzung zum Entfernen von Kesselstein

Composition pour enlever le tartre


(84) Designated Contracting States:
AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

(43) Date of publication of application:
29.07.1992 Bulletin 1992/31

(73) Proprietor: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (US)

(72) Inventor:
  • Vos, Eddy
    B-3210 Linden (BE)

(74) Representative: Canonici, Jean-Jacques et al
Procter & Gamble European Technical Center N.V. Temselaan 100
1853 Strombeek-Bever
1853 Strombeek-Bever (BE)


(56) References cited: : 
EP-A- 411 708
EP-B- 0 089 256
GB-A- 2 156 831
EP-A- 0 141 395
GB-A- 2 106 927
US-A- 3 277 008
   
     
    Remarks:
    The file contains technical information submitted after the application was filed and not included in this specification
     
    Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention).


    Description

    Technical field



    [0001] The present invention relates to cleaning compositions for hard surfaces. Specifically, compositions are described which are designed to give optimal performance in removing limescale stains and encrustations.

    Background



    [0002] Tap water always contains a certain amount of water hardness salts such as calcium carbonate which eventually deposit on surfaces which are often in contact with said water, resulting in an unaesthetic aspect of said surfaces. This limescale deposition phenomenon is even more acute in places where water is particularly hard.

    [0003] Typically, these limescale deposits are removed by using a cleaning composition comprising an acid which "dissolves" limescale, typically phosphoric acid. however, phosphoric acid has become subject to discussions, in relation to environmental questions. It is therefore an object of this invention to find an alternative to phosphoric acid in this particular context.

    [0004] In addition, it has been observed that state of the art compositions do not perform equally well on all limescale-containing stains, particularly on limescale-containing stains which are mainly found in the bathroom. These bathroom-type stains appear to contain not only calcium carbonate, but also soap scum, and it has now been found that soap scum is detrimental to the limescale removing performance of said compositions.

    [0005] It is therefore an object of the present invention to obviate this issue in providing a cleaning composition for the removal of limescale, said composition possessing a superior limescale removing capacity, said composition being also effective on limescale-containing bathroom-type stains.

    [0006] DE 33 40 033 describes a composition for the removal of limestone traces on laundry; these compositions contain maleic acid and nonionic surfactants, as well as high amounts of phosphoric acid and urea.

    [0007] EP 200 776 describes a method to remove precipitates containing mainly calcium carbonate by using a mixture of a Lewis acid and a protonic acid, possibly maleic acid.

    [0008] J 61 28 3700 (abstract) discloses detergent compositions for bathroom which comprises a maleic acid or anhydride-based polymer and a nonionic surfactant; these compositions also comprise cationic surfactants.

    [0009] EP 0 336 878 discloses an acidic cleaning composition comprising conventional surfactants and a dicarboxylic acid. Maleic acid is not mentioned.

    [0010] EP 0 141 395 discloses a composition suitable for removing limescale and encrustations from fabrics and washing machines. More particularly, EP 0 141 395 discloses liquid fabric conditioners comprising maleic acid, phosphoric acid, urea and nonionic surfactants.

    [0011] GB 2 106 927 discloses liquid thickened toilet bowl cleaners comprising a non volatile water soluble organic acid, a surfactant (e.g., a nonionic surfactant), and a cellulose ether, said composition having a pH of 2.2 to 3.5. The organic acids disclosed in said compositions include a fatty acid having from 2 to 3 carbon atoms, a dicarboxylic acid having from 3 to 8 carbon atoms, a hydroxy carboxylic acid containing 1 to 6 carbon atoms, 1 to 5 hydroxyl groups and 1 to 3 carboxyl groups, or mixtures thereof. Maleic acid is not mentioned amongst the suitable organic acids. Indeed, GB 2 106 927 expressly states that maleic acid was not screened.

    [0012] EP- 0 411 708 discloses acidic aqueous liquid cleaners (pH=1-4) for hard-surfaces, comprising a surfactant (e.g., nonionic surfactants), organic acids having 2 to 10 carbon atoms, an aminoalkylenephosphonic acid and phosphoric acid.

    [0013] US 3 277 008 discloses a composition suitable for use with water to form an aqueous solution for descaling the internal metal surfaces of the jacket of glass-lined jacked equipment. This composition comprises a cleaning agent, an alpha-beta ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid like maleic acid and a corrosion inhibitor. No nonionic surfactants are disclosed therein.

    Summary of the invention



    [0014] The compositions according to the invention are aqueous compositions comprising from 1% to 15% by weight of the total composition of a nonionic surfactant or mixtures thereof and from 4% to 25 % by weight of the total composition of maleic acid; said compositions having a pH as is of from 1.0 to 4.0.

    Detailed description of the invention.



    [0015] The present invention is partly based on the finding that maleic acid possesses an unexpected superior limescale removing capacity, compared to phosphoric acid and compared to other dicarboxylic acids at equal levels.

    [0016] Therefore, the compositions according to the invention comprise from 4% to 25% by weight of the total composition of maleic acid. This percentage is calculated on the basis of the molecular weight of the acid form, but maleic anhydride is equally convenient for use in the compositions according to the present invention. Indeed, maleic anhydride is generally cheaper and it is transformed into the acid form when incorporated in an aqueous medium.

    [0017] It has been observed that the limescale removing capacity of the composition raises with the amount of maleic acid, up to a certain amount where a plateau in the limescale removing performance is reached. Accordingly, the compositions preferably comprise from 6 to 10% of maleic acid.

    [0018] The compositions according to the invention have a pH as is of from 1.0 to 4.0. The limescale removing capacity of the composition is strongly dependent on its pH, and the lower the pH, the better the limescale removing performance; the pH of the composition also has an effect on the shine performance of the compositions, and the higher the pH, the better the shine; one therefore has to balance the pH so as to obtain the desired compromise between limescale removing performance and shine performance. The compositions according to the invention preferably have a pH as is in the range of from 1 to 2, preferably 1.2.

    [0019] The compositions according to the present invention also comprise a nonionic surfactant system. Indeed, typical limescale removing compositions do not perform optimally on bathroom type soils; this technical problem, which is not recognized in the art, is believed to be due to the soap scum which is present ,together with limescale, in bathroom type soils; indeed, soap scum has now been identified as having a detrimental effect on the limescale removing capacity of the composition.

    [0020] In response to this issue, it is desirable to formulate a limescale removing composition which also comprises a surfactant system; it has now been found that the use of nonionic surfactants is much more desirable than other surfactants types, in order to address said technical issue and yet preserve an optimum limescale removing performance. Indeed, anionic and cationic surfactants have been found to adversely affect the limescale removing capacity of maleic acid. Therefore, the compositions according to the invention comprise from 1% to 15% by weight of the total composition of a nonionic surfactant or mixtures thereof, preferably from 2% to 4% by weight of the total composition, and the compositions according to the present invention are preferably free of cationic and anionic surfactants.

    [0021] Nonionic surfactants are conventionally produced by condensing ethylene oxide with a hydrocarbon having a reactive hydrogen, e.g. a hydroxyl, carboxyl, or amido group, in the presence of an acidic or basic catalyst, and include compounds having the general formula RA(CH2CH2O)nH, wherein R represents the hydrophobic moiety, A represents the group carrying the reactive hydrogen atom, and n represents the average number of ethylene oxide moieties. R typically contains from 2 to 22 carbon atoms. Nonionic surfactants can also be formed by the condensation of propylene oxide with a lower molecular weight compound. n usually varies from 2 to 24. The hydrophobic moiety of the nonionic compound can be a primary or secondary, straight or branched alcohol having from about 8 to about 24 carbon atoms. Preferred nonionic surfactants for use in the compositions according to the invention are the condensation products of ethylene oxide with alcohols having a straight alkyl chain, having from 6 to 22 carbon atoms, wherein the degree of ethoxylation is from 5 to 12 Most preferred are C8-C12 ethoxylated alcohols with a degree of ethoxylation of 6; these surfactants are commercially available from Shell under the trade name Dobanol R 91-6. These nonionics are preferred because they have been found to allow the formulation of a stable product without requiring the addition of stabilizers or hydrotopes. When using other nonionics, it may be necessary to add hydrotopes such as cumene sulphonate or solvents such as butyldiglycolether

    [0022] The compositions according to the invention may additionally comprise optional ingredients such as colorants, bactericides, perfumes, thickeners, and the like.

    Experimental Data


    a) Effect of soap scum on the limescale removing capacity of maleic acid, and effect of surfactants. :



    [0023] The limescale removing (LSR) capacity of different solutions was measured by soaking a marble block of standardized size in these solutions during 30 minutes; marble blocks are chemically speaking very similar to lime scale, i.e. contain essentially calcium carbonate. Each marble block is weighed before and after the experiment, and the performance is expressed in grams of marble block "dissolved" during the 30 minutes.
    • Composition A in an aqueous solution containing 8% of maleic acid.
    • Composition B is an aqueous composition comprising 8% maleic acid and 3% of a , C8-12 alcohol 6 times ethoxylated (nonionic surfactant)
    • Composition C is an aqueous solution comprising 8% maleic acid and 3% of Coconut alkyl sulfate (anionic surfactant)


    [0024] This experiment was conducted for these three compositions in two different conditions, either using a clean marble block, or a soap scum covered marble block. The results were:
    Compositions: A B C
    LSR/clean marble block: 0.88 0.89 0.78
    LSR/ soap scum covered: 0.36 0.86 0.60


    [0025] The above results call for the following comments:
    • The different results for composition A show that soap scum is detrimental to the LSR of maleic acid (0.88 vs 0.36).
    • The comparable results for composition B shows that the presence of nonionic surfactants addresses this issue (0.89 vs 0.86)
    • The results for composition C show that anionic surfactants are less efficient in addressing this issue.(0.78 vs 0.60)
    • comparing the results of all three compositions using the clean marble block shows that nonionic surfactants do not affect the LSR of maleic acid (0.89 vs 0.88) while anionic do (0.78 vs 0.88). This is confirmed when the test is performed using the soap scum covered marble block.

    b) Comparison of lime scale removing capacity of different dicarboxylic acids:



    [0026] Different dicarboxylic acids were tested at 2%, 5% and 10% in a base composition . Marble blocks of standardized size were then soaked in each of these compositions, and the LSR was determined as in the previous test in a) herein above. NS stands for "not soluble" i.e. the tested acid is not soluble in the tested composition.

    [0027] The results were:





    [0028] The above results show that maleic acid has a higher LSR than the other dicarboxylic acids tested.




    Claims

    1. An aqueous cleaning composition for hard surfaces comprising from 1% to 15% by weight of the total composition of a nonionic surfactant or mixtures thereof, from 4% to 25% by weight of the total composition of maleic acid, said composition having a pH as is of from 1.0 to 4.0, said composition being free of urea, with the exception of compositions comprising phosphoric acid together with an amino alkylene phosphonic acid.
     
    2. A composition according to claim 1 comprising from 6% to 10% by weight of the total composition of maleic acid
     
    3. A composition according to claim 1 or 2, having a pH as is of from 1.0 to 2.0, preferably 1.2.
     
    4. A composition according to any of the preceeding claims comprising from 2% to 4% by weight of the total composition of a nonionic surfactant or mixtures thereof.
     
    5. A composition according to any of the preceeding claims wherein the nonionic surfactant is a condensation product of ethylene oxide with an alcohol, said alcohol having a straight alkyl chain comprising from 6 to 22 carbon atoms, preferably 8 to 12, said condensation product having a degree of ethoxylation of from 5 to 12, preferably 6.
     
    6. A composition according to any of the preceeding claims which is substantially free of anionic or cationic surfactant.
     
    7. A composition according to any of the preceeding claims which is substantially free of phosphoric acid.
     


    Ansprüche

    1. Wäßrige Reinigungszusammensetzung für harte Oberflächen, umfassend 1% bis 15%, bezogen auf das Gewicht der Gesamtzusammensetzung, von einem nichtionischen grenzflächenaktiven Mittel oder von Gemischen hievon, 4% bis 25%, bezogen auf das Gewicht der Gesamtzusammensetzung, an Maleinsäure, welche Zusammensetzung als solche einen pH-Wert von 1,0 bis 4,0 besitzt, welche Zusammensetzung von Harnstoff frei ist, wobei Zusammensetzungen, die Phosphorsäure gemeinsam mit einer Aminoalkylenphosphonsäure enthalten, ausgeschlossen sind.
     
    2. Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 1, umfassend 6% bis 10%, bezogen auf das Gewicht der Gesamtzusammensetzung, an Maleinsäure.
     
    3. Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, welche als solche einen pH-Wert von 1,0 bis 2,0, vorzugsweise von 1,2 aufweist.
     
    4. Zusammensetzung nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, umfassend 2% bis 4%, bezogen auf das Gewicht der Gesamtzusammensetzung, von einem nichtionischen grenzflächenaktiven Mittel oder von Gemischen hievon.
     
    5. Zusammensetzung nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, worin das nichtionische grenzflächenaktive Mittel ein Kondensationsprodukt von Ethylenoxid und einem Alkohol ist, welcher Alkohol eine geradkettige Alkylkette mit 6 bis 22, vorzugsweise 8 bis 12 Kohlenstoffatomen aufweist, welches Kondensationsprodukt einen Ethoxylierungsgrad von 5 bis 12, vorzugsweise von 6 besitzt.
     
    6. Zusammensetzung nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, welche von einem anionischen oder einem kationischen grenzflächenaktiven Mittel im wesentlichen frei ist.
     
    7. Zusammensetzung nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, welche von Phosphorsäure im wesentlichen frei ist.
     


    Revendications

    1. Composition nettoyante aqueuse pour surfaces dures, comprenant de 1 à 15 % en poids, par rapport à la composition totale, d'un tensioactif non ionique ou d'un mélange de tels tensioactifs, de 4 à 25 % en poids, par rapport à la composition totale, d'acide maléique, ladite composition ayant un pH compris entre 1,0 et 4,0, ladite composition étant exempte d'urée, à l'exception de compositions comprenant de l'acide phosphorique conjointement avec un acide aminoalkylènephosphonique.
     
    2. Composition selon la revendication 1, comprenant de 6 à 10 % en poids, par rapport à la composition totale, d'acide maléique.
     
    3. Composition selon la revendication 1 ou 2, ayant un pH compris entre 1,0 et 2,0, de préférence de 1,2.
     
    4. Composition selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comprenant de 2 à 4 % en poids, par rapport à la composition totale, d'un tensioactif non ionique ou d'un mélange de tels tensioactifs.
     
    5. Composition selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle le tensioactif non ionique est un produit de condensation d'oxyde d'éthylène avec un alcool, ledit alcool ayant une chaîne alkyle droite comprenant de 6 à 22 et de préférence de 8 à 12 atomes de carbone, ledit produit de condensation ayant un degré d'éthoxylation compris entre 5 et 12, de préférence de 6.
     
    6. Composition selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, qui est pratiquement exempte de tensioactif anionique ou cationique.
     
    7. Composition selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, qui est pratiquement exempte d'acide phosphorique.