FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention is directed to recycling waste, particularly cellulose esters, generated
during the manufacture of filtered cigarettes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Fibrous cellulose esters, particularly cellulose acetate, are the commercially preferred
media for filtration of smoke from filtered cigarettes. This commercial application
consumes worldwide several hundred million pounds of cellulose acetate fiber per year.
During the production of these filtered cigarettes, a certain percentage of them will
not be brought to market, due to damage of goods, variation from specification, or
other reasons. Those cigarette which are not sold are typically subjected to a reclamation
process wherein the tobacco-laden portion of the cigarette is mechanically broken
from the filter, and the tobacco is removed by shaking within a screening device.
An example of this process is given in U.S. Patent No. 3,224,451.
[0003] After reclamation of tobacco, several tens of millions of pounds of residual material,
referred to as "ripper waste" in the industry, comprised of cellulose acetate (typically
plasticized for example with glycerol triacetate), paper, residual tobacco, and often
flavors and fragrances remain; this ripper waste is most generally disposed of as
landfill, representing both a loss of natural resources and a burden on landfill capacity.
[0004] The composition of ripper waste varies depending on the specifics of the cigarette
products and the tobacco reclamation process employed. Typical composition ranges,
by weight, of ripper waste are: a) cellulose acetate, 40-55%; b) plasticizer, 1-12%;
c) paper, 25-45%; d) residual tobacco, 1-15%; e) adhesives, 2-3%; and f) flavors/fragrances,
<1%. Additional components, for example charcoal, may be found in these waste streams,
depending on the specific cigarette product.
[0005] The physical/mechanical separations employed in reclaiming cigarette components have
in the past either focused on sifting tobacco away from other components, as is the
case in U.S. Patent No. 3,224,451, or in the removal of cellulose acetate filter media
from its paper liner, as in U.S. Patent No. 4,261,790.
[0006] Other approaches have included enzymatic degradation of the cellulose acetate to
produce useful sugars, as in U.S. Patent No. 4,298,013.
[0007] Isolation of cellulose acetate from ripper waste is insufficient to provide a recycled
product of high commercial utility. During the manufacture of cigarettes, the cellulose
acetate is treated with a plasticizer which improves the mechanical performance of
the finished filter. The cellulose acetate may also be treated with flavorants, for
example, menthol, and the cellulose acetate will absorb some levels of nicotine and
other substances from the tobacco. If the cellulose acetate/plasticizer/flavors mixture
is dissolved in a typical cellulose ester solvent, and reformed into a product, these
extraneous substances will change both the mechanical and the sensory properties of
the cellulose acetate, thereby reducing the overall quality of products manufactured
with these recycled materials. Extraction with conventional solvents, such as ethanol,
can be used to remove the majority of undesirable contaminants from cellulose acetate.
But, the extraction solvents then become an undesirable contaminant, and reduce the
product quality. An additional difficulty introduced by use of such extraction solvents
is that they can escape into the environment, necessitating costly preventative measures.
[0008] The difficulties attendant in the use of conventional organic extractions can be
avoided by use of a supercritical or near supercritical fluid extraction as in U.
S. Patent No. 5,328,934.
[0009] In such a critical or near supercritical extraction process, a material which is
gaseous under normal atmospheric temperatures and pressures, for example carbon dioxide,
is converted into a high pressure solvent. This high pressure solvent can effectively
dissolve the contaminants present in the filter tip waste, liberating these organic
contaminants when the fluid's pressure and temperature are reduced. The extraction
fluid used in this supercritical or near supercritical process can be effectively
recycled within the process, and does not leave a residue within the recycled cellulose
ester polymer product. While this high pressure process can effectively cleanse filter
tip waste of it unwanted organic contaminants, it does require a significant capital
investment for the construction of equipment vessels capable of safe operation under
the relatively high pressures required to enter the supercritical or near supercritical
region of most desirable fluids.
[0010] In U.S. Patent No. 4,191,199, water is used to soften the glue seams in whole cigarettes.
Once the tobacco column, that portion of the cigarette which actually contains the
tobacco, has been opened, then free tobacco can be mechanically removed by traditional
routes.
[0011] Water wash steps used in the manufacture of virgin cellulose ester polymer are well
known to those skilled in the art. Such washing removes manufacturing residues such
as long chain fatty acids, and acetic acid from the cellulose ester polymer. Such
water washing of virgin cellulose ester polymers is described in U.S. Patent Nos.
2,264,828, 2,860,132, and "Cellulose Acetate",
Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[0012] Another application of water processing in the reclamation of cigarette waste is
the reconstitution of small particles of tobacco, fines, recovered through traditional
shaking/screening processes into a tobacco sheet or paper. An example of such a reconstitution
process is given in U.S. Patent No. 3,012,914.
[0013] The technical literature contains a great many references to the wet pulping of cellulose.
Those familiar with the chemistry, binding properties, and solution properties of
both cellulose acetate and cellulose will recognize that these two structural polymers
share few common properties, and, therefore, must be treated as different materials.
See, "Cellulose" and "Cellulose Acetate",
Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0014] A process for recycling waste from the manufacture of filtered cigarettes is disclosed
herein, which process comprises the steps of:
providing a waste stream from the manufacture of filtered cigarettes, the waste stream
including tobacco, filter tips comprising cellulose ester polymer, and paper;
separating the filter tips from the waste stream; and
washing the filter tips with water to remove any paper bound to the filter tips and
to remove any contaminants from the cellulose ester polymer, wherein the ratio of
water to cellulose ester polymer is between 0.85:1 and 200:1.
[0015] The cellulose ester polymer may the be dried, resolutioned, and processed into useful
articles of commerce.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0016] The present invention, which is directed to a process for recycling the waste from
the manufacture of filtered cigarettes, is set forth in greater detail below.
[0017] The waste stream from the manufacture of filtered cigarettes comprises generally
tobacco, paper, and cellulose ester filter material. This waste stream may be ripper
waste, as discussed above, or may be the entire broken filtered cigarettes (the differences
between the latter and the former being that the latter would have a greater tobacco
content). The cellulose ester filter material typically comprises a fibrous form of
cellulose acetate, which is referred to in the industry as "TOW", and various contaminants,
discussed below.
[0018] The cellulose ester filter material or polymer generally comprises cellulose acetate
(acetyl value of ranging from 38% to 41%), but may also include other conventionally
known or commercially available cellulose esters. The cellulose acetate filters are
typically contaminated with plasticizers, adhesives, and flavors/fragrance during
the manufacture of both the filter tips and of the filtered cigarettes. Examples of
plasticizers include triacetin (also known as glycerol triacetate, or PZ), trimethylene
glycol diacetate (also known as TEGDA), and mixtures thereof. Examples of adhesives
used in the manufacture of cigarettes include polyvinyl acetate (PVA), ethylene vinyl
acetate (EVA), cellulose acetate, and mixtures thereof. The flavors/fragrances may
be absorbed by the filter material from the tobacco, for example, nicotine, or may
be added, for example, menthol.
[0019] Preferably, before the contaminants are removed from cellulose ester polymer, the
cellulose ester polymer is removed from the waste stream. The weight content of tobacco
in the cellulose ester polymer, after the separation, should be less than 1% by weight.
[0020] Any conventional means may be used for separating the cellulose ester polymer from
the waste stream. Examples of such methods include: manually separating tobacco and
paper from the cellulose ester polymer; screening or sifting paper and tobacco from
the cellulose ester polymer; and cycloning or elutriating the paper and tobacco from
the cellulose ester polymer. Elutriation by air is the preferred method for separating
the cellulose ester polymer from the waste stream.
[0021] Optionally, the waste stream, either before or after the foregoing separation, may
be subjected to any conventional particle size reduction process. These particle size
reduction processes facilitate separation as is known to those of ordinary skill in
the art. Such processes include grinding, chopping, milling, and pelletizing.
[0022] Once the loose paper and tobacco materials have been separated from the cellulose
ester filter tips, two additional separations are required to ultimately produce recycled
cellulose acetate free or substantially free of contaminants. The cellulose ester
filter material will generally be encased, or wrapped in a paper plug wrap (or tipping
paper), which is generally glued to itself or to the filter. Removal of this bound
paper will be necessary to insure both the purity and the filterability of solutions
of the recycled cellulose ester. The cellulose ester filter material will also be
generally contaminated by the tobacco flavorants/fragrances, adhesives, and plasticizers
detailed above.
[0023] The removal of the tipping paper and of the contaminants contained in the cellulose
ester filter material is accomplished in this invention, by a water washing process.
The combination of water and heat can result in the nearly complete removal of tipping
paper from the cellulose ester. The same washing process, under the proper conditions,
can result in the complete removal of plasticizers, adhesives, and flavors/fragrances
within the limits of detection of analytical instruments routinely employed for chemical
analyses.
[0024] The water used in the washing process may be between 10 and 100 °C. The pH of the
water may be between 4.0 and 8.0. The water to cellulose ester ratio is between 0.85:1
and 200:1. The addition of low levels (less than 1% by weight) of surfactants may
be employed to improve the efficiency of the washing process. Alternatively, steam,
generally below 7.9 bar (100 psig) in pressure, may be used in lieu of water, or in
addition to water in the washing process of this invention. Oxidizers such as peroxide
or bleaches may be added to improve tip color and/or serve as a pretreatment to accelerate
the breakage of the paper's hydrogen bonding, thus making the paper removal easier
during the hot water wash process step.
[0025] The washing process maybe accomplished using any suitable device or container. These
devices include static baskets, rotary baskets, rotary tumblers, and screw or auger
driven continuous washers. Such washing devices are commercially available, and will
be well known to those skilled in the art.
[0026] The conditions used during the washing process may be constant throughout the process,
or may be varied by stages or cycles. Use of stages or cycles to vary conditions may
be used to optimize the washing efficiency, while minimizing the consumption of energy
and water.
[0027] In a preferred embodiment, cellulose ester polymer is washed with liquid water held
between 15 and 55 °C in a multiple stage process.
[0028] Once washed, and free of contaminants, the cellulose ester polymer may be dried using
any commercially available drier suited for such polymers. Such equipment, and the
processes for their operation, are well known to those skilled in the art.
[0029] The water washing process of this invention produces cellulose ester polymer of sufficiently
good quality that it can be resolvated, filtered, and used as virgin polymer or with
virgin polymer. However, if necessary, this recycled polymer could be subjected to
further separation if residual tobacco or paper remain.
[0030] Other details and aspects of the invention are more fully described in the examples
set forth hereinafter.
Example 1
[0031] This example illustrates the separation of the waste stream, i.e. ripper waste, from
a cigarette manufacturing operation. The waste stream comprised, in major components,
of tobacco, paper and filter tips (fibrous cellulose acetate).A total of 134kg (295
pounds) of this waste was separated into its three major components. The final weight
of each component stream is as follows: 30.1 kg (66.5 pounds) - tobacco; 29.4 kg (65
pounds) - paper; and 74.1 kg (163.5 pounds) - filter tips.
[0032] The separation was accomplished by means of air elutriation. A commercially available
elutriator, Sterling Model 1608EL from Sterling Blower Company of Lynchburg, VA, was
used. It was operated with air at 1524 m/min (5000 feet per minute) flow rate.
[0033] 134 kg (295 pounds) of waste product was introduced into the elutriator for a first
pass of separation. At the end of this pass, a mixture of 27.6 kg (61 pounds) - tobacco
and 21.7 kg (48 pounds) - paper was removed from the remaining mass. The mixture of
tobacco and paper was separated into its components by use of a conventional shaker
screen device, as is well known.
[0034] The remaining mass was reintroduced into the elutriator for a second pass. At the
end of this pass, a mixture of 2.3 kg (5 pounds) - tobacco and 4.5 kg (10 pounds)
- paper was removed and further resolved into components by the shaker screen method
noted above.
[0035] The remaining mass from the second pass was reintroduced into the elutriator for
a third pass, At the end of this pass, a mixture of 0.23 kg (0.5 pounds) - tobacco
and 3.2 kg (7 pounds) - paper was removed and separated as before. The remaining mass,
which weighed 74.1 kg (163.5 pounds), consisted primarily of filter tips, but included
trace amounts of tobacco and paper as was apparent by visual inspection.
Example 2
[0036] The waste product with tobacco and paper removed, for example in the manner set forth
in Example 1, consisted substantially of filter tips from cigarettes. The tipping
paper which surrounds the cellulose acetate filter media, and the contaminants contained
in the cellulose acetate, were removed via a water washing technique.
[0037] The filter tip waste, prior to water washing, was analyzed to quantify contaminant
levels. Using conventional gas chromatography techniques, the amount of plasticizer
(glycerol triacetate) was measured at 7.59% by weight. Using industry acceptable techniques,
the samples were observed to possess a strong tobacco odor and taste.
[0038] Water washing of cellulose acetate filter tips was accomplished by flowing water
through a basket constructed of 316-stainless steel plate containing 3.18 mm (0.125
inch) circular perforations. Samples of 50-100 grams of filter tip waste were weighed
and placed on the basket. Water 5-10 liters per minute, and heated to 65 °C, was flowed
over the filters for 10-20 minutes. At the completion of the water washing, the cellulose
acetate (now >99 % free of paper, as measured by dissolution in acetone and gravimetric
analysis) was oven dried at for 24 hours. After water washing, and drying, the samples,
when analyzed, showed no trace of plasticizer (detection limit of the instrument was
0.0001%) and no trace of the odor nor the taste present in the feedstock.
Example 3
[0039] The water washing/drying procedure set forth on Example 2 was repeated, except the
wash water was heated to 95 °C before flowing into the washing basket. After water
washing and drying, the samples, when analyzed, showed no trace of plasticizer and
no trace of the odor nor the taste present in the feedstock.
Example 4
[0040] The washing/drying procedure set forth in Example 2 was repeated, substituting a
steam autoclave for the washing basket. Filter waste tips (50 grams) were washed with
5.4 kg (12pounds) steam for 10 minutes. After washing and drying,the samples,when
analyzed, showed no trace of plasticizer and no trace of the odor nor the taste present
in the feedstock.
Example 5
[0041] This example illustrates the use of a commercially available, industrial washer ("American
Cascade" Model, American Laundry Machinery Co., of Cincinnati, OH). Samples of filter
tip waste (5-10pounds) were placed in a 4.75mm (0.187inch) mesh nylon mesh laundry
bag,and subsequently washed with water in the washing machine. The range of conditions
for the water washings are set forth on Table 1.
[0042] After washing and oven drying, the samples from washes 2-7 in Table 1 showed no trace
of plasticizer and no trace of the odor nor the taste present in the feedstock. The
sample obtained from wash 1, was relatively dark in color, and possessed a slight
tobacco odor.
Example 6
[0043] Cellulose acetate, reclaimed using the water washing process set forth in Example
5 (using wash conditions defined as washes 4-7 in Table 1) was combined with virgin
cellulose acetate, dissolved in acetone to produce a 26.8% solution containing 80%/20%
virgin:recycled cellulose acetate. This solution was then filtered through a nominal
12 µm filter, and spun into a 0.22 - 0.39 Tex (2.0-3.5 denier) per filament fiber
on a dry spinning machine. From the resultant filament, cigarette filters were fashioned.
Samples of the 80/20 virgin/recycle filters and of 100% virgin cellulose acetate filters
were assembled with commercially available tobacco columns to produce cigarettes.
These cigarettes were tasted for taste at Tragon Associates of Redwood City, CA, an
independent laboratory which conducts such taste testing on a routine basis. The taste
panel testing found no statistically significant difference between cigarettes produced
with 100% virgin cellulose acetate filters and those produced with 80%/20% virgin/recycled
cellulose acetate.
Example 7
[0044] Accelerated paper removal and whiter tips were observed when a peroxide solution
pretreatment step was added to the process described in example 2. This improvement
was accomplished by spraying a solution of 11.0 - 17.5% hydrogen peroxide mixed with
water onto the filter tips at a 0.16kg (0.35pounds) of solution to 1 pound of tips
while blending in a Marion Model #1001 horizontal mixer (available from Marion Mixer,
Inc. of Marion, IA) for 20 to 40 minutes at 75 to 150 rpms. It was also discovered
that water alone could achieve the same effect in paper removal but would require
1.20kg (2.66pounds) of water for every 0.45kg(1.0pound) of tips processed, however,
the peroxide solution pretreated tips had a visually whiter appearance.
TABLE 1
Wash # |
Batch Size, kg(lbs) |
# Wash Cycles |
Cycle#/Temp. °C (deg. F) |
Cycle#/Time, min |
Batch/F low-thru |
% Paper removal |
color |
1 |
2.3(5) |
5X |
1/99 (210) |
1/15 |
1/batch |
1/95 |
yellow brown tint |
2/54 (130) |
2/10 |
2/batch |
2/99 |
3/54 (130) |
3/10 |
3/flow |
3/100 |
4/54 (130) |
4/10 |
4/flow |
4/100 |
5/82 (180) |
5/10 |
5/batch |
5/100 |
2 |
2.3(5) |
5X |
1/46 (115) |
1/30 |
1/flow |
1/ND |
slight yellow |
2/16 (60) |
2/30 |
2/flow |
2/90 |
3/54 (130) |
3/30 |
3/batch |
3ND |
4/49 (120) |
4/10 |
4/flow |
4/99.9 |
5/16 (60) |
5/02 |
5/flow |
5/99.9 |
3 |
2.3(5) |
7X |
1/54 (130) |
1/10 |
1/batch |
|
slight yellow |
2/54 (130) |
2/10 |
2/batch |
|
3/54 (130) |
3/10 |
3/batch |
|
4/54 (130) |
4/10 |
4/batch |
|
5/54 (130) |
5/10 |
5/batch |
|
6/43 (110) |
6/10 |
6/flow |
|
7/16 (60) |
7/10 |
7/flow |
7/100 |
4 |
2.3(5) |
5X |
1/16 (60) |
1/15 |
1/flow |
|
white |
2/27 (80) |
2/10 |
2/batch |
|
3/NA |
3/20 |
3/batch |
|
4/54 (130) |
4/30 |
4/batch |
|
5/27 (80) |
5/15 |
5/flow |
5/99.9 |
5 |
4.5(10) |
5X |
1/16 (60) |
1/15 |
1/flow |
|
white slight yellow |
2/54 (130) |
2/15 |
2/batch |
|
3/54 (130) |
3/15 |
3/batch |
|
4/54 (130) |
4/15 |
4/batch |
|
5/32 (90) |
5/15 |
5/flow |
5/99.9 |
6 |
4.5(10) |
5X |
1/14 (58) |
1/15 |
1/flow |
1/50 |
white |
2/43 (110) |
2/15 |
2/batch |
2/60 |
3/14 (58) |
3/15 |
3/flow |
3/70 |
4/49 (120) |
4/15 |
4/batch |
5/97 |
5/14 (58) |
5/10 |
5/flow |
5/99.9 |
7 |
4.5(10) |
5X |
1/16 (60) |
1/10 |
1/flow |
1/50 |
white |
2/49 (120) |
2/10 |
2/batch |
2/60 |
3/16 (60) |
3/10 |
3/flow |
3/70 |
4/49 (120) |
4/15 |
4/batch |
4/97 |
5/16 (60) |
5/10 |
5/flow |
5/99.9 |
NC - not determined
NA - not available |
1. A process for recycling the waste from the manufacture of filtered cigarettes, said
process comprising the steps of:
providing a waste stream from the manufacture of filtered cigarettes, the waste stream
including tobacco, filter tips comprising cellulose ester polymer, and paper;
separating the filter tips from the waste stream; and
washing the filter tips with water to remove any paper bound to the filter tips and
to remove any contaminants from the cellulose ester polymer, wherein the ratio of
water to cellulose ester polymer is between 0.85:1 and 200:1.
2. The process according to claim 1 wherein separating is by means of air elutriation.
3. The process according to claim 1 wherein during separating the tobacco content in
the filter tips is reduced to at least 1 % by weight.
4. The process according to claim 1 further comprising the step of reducing the particle
size of the waste stream.
5. The process according to claim 1 wherein said water is between 10 and 100 °C.
6. The process according to claim 1 wherein said water has a pH between 4.0 to 8.0.
7. The process according to claim 1 further comprising adding a surfactant, at less than
1.0 % by weight, during washing.
8. The process according to claim 1 wherein said water is steam with an operating pressure
of up to 7.9 bar (100 psig).
9. The process according to claim 1 wherein a portion of said water is between 10 and
100 °C , and a portion of the water is steam with an operating pressure of up to 7.9
bar (100 psig).
10. The process according to claim 1 wherein said water includes an oxidizer.
11. The process according to claim 1 further comprising the step of pretreating said filter
tips after separation from said waste stream with an oxidizer.
12. A process for recycling filter tips from filtered cigarettes, said process comprising
the steps of:
providing a waste stream of filter tips and paper, said filter tips comprising cellulose
ester polymer; and
washing the filter tips with water to remove any paper bound to the filter tip and
to remove any contaminates from the cellulose ester polymers, wherein the ratio of
water to cellulose ester polymer is between 0.85:1 and 200:1.
1. Verfahren zur Wiederverwertung des Abfalls der Filterzigaretten-Herstellung, umfassend
die Stufen:
des Bereitstellens eines Abfallstroms der Filterzigaretten-Herstellung, wobei der
Abfallstrom Tabak, ein Celluloseester-Polymer umfassende Filterspitzen und Papier
einschließt;
des Abtrennens der Filterspitzen vom Abfallstrom; und
des Waschens der Filterspitzen mit Wasser, um das gesamte Papier zu entfernen, das
an die Filterspitzen gebunden ist, und alle Verunreinigungen aus dem Celluloseester-Polymer
zu entfernen, worin das Verhältnis von Wasser zu Celluloseester-Polymer zwischen 0,85:1
und 200:1 liegt.
2. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, worin das Abtrennen durch Luftwäsche erfolgt.
3. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, worin während des Abtrennens der Tabakgehalt in den Filterspitzen
auf wenigstens 1 Gew.-% reduziert wird.
4. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, das weiterhin die Stufe der Reduzierung der Teilchengröße
des Abfallstroms umfaßt.
5. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, worin das Wasser eine Temperatur zwischen 10 und 100 °C
aufweist.
6. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, worin das Wasser einen pH zwischen 4,0 und 8,0 hat.
7. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, das weiterhin die Stufe der Zugabe von weniger als 1,0
Gew.-% eines Tensids während des Waschens umfaßt.
8. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, worin das Wasser Dampf mit einem Arbeitsdruck von bis
zu 7,9 bar (100 psig) ist.
9. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, worin ein Teil des Wassers eine Temperatur zwischen 10
und 100 °C aufweist, und ein Teil des Wassers Dampf mit einem Arbeitsdruck von bis
zu 7,9 bar (100 psig) ist.
10. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, worin das Wasser ein Oxidationsmittel einschließt.
11. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, das weiterhin die Stufe der Vorbehandlung der Filterspitzen
mit einem Oxidationsmittel nach der Abtrennung von dem Abfallstrom umfaßt.
12. Verfahren zur Wiederverwertung von Filterspitzen von Filterzigaretten, umfassend die
Stufen:
des Bereitstellens eines Abfallstroms von Filterspitzen und Papier, wobei die Filterspitzen
Celluloseester-Poly mer umfassen; und
des Waschens der Filterspitzen mit Wasser, um das gesamte Papier zu entfernen, das
an die Filterspitzen gebunden ist, und alle Verunreinigungen aus den Celluloseester-Polymeren
zu entfernen, worin das Verhältnis von Wasser zu Celluloseester-Polymer zwischen 0,85:1
und 200:1 liegt.
1. Procédé de recyclage de déchets provenant de la fabrication de cigarettes à filtre,
ledit procédé comprenant les étapes consistant à :
fournir un flux de déchets provenant de la fabrication de cigarettes à filtre, le
flux de déchets comprenant du tabac, des bouts filtres comprenant un polymère ester
de cellulose, et du papier ;
séparer les bouts filtres du flux de déchets ; et
laver les bouts filtres avec de l'eau pour éliminer tout papier lié aux bouts filtres
et pour éliminer tous les contaminants provenant du polymère ester de cellulose, le
rapport de l'eau au polymère ester de cellulose étant compris entre 0,85:1 et 200:1.
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel on effectue la séparation par élutriation
à l'air.
3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel, pendant la séparation, la teneur en
tabac dans les bouts filtres est réduite à au moins 1 % en poids.
4. Procédé selon la revendication 1, comprenant, en outre, l'étape de réduction de la
dimension des particules du flux de déchets.
5. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel ladite eau est à une température comprise
entre 10 et 100°C.
6. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel ladite eau a un pH compris entre 4,0
et 8,0.
7. Procédé selon la revendication 1, comprenant, en outre, l'addition d'un agent tensio-actif
à raison de moins de 1,0 % en poids pendant le lavage.
8. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel ladite eau est à l'état de vapeur avec
une pression de service allant jusqu'à 7,9 bars (100 psig).
9. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel une partie de ladite eau est à une température
comprise entre 10 et 100°C, et une partie de l'eau est de la vapeur à une pression
de service allant jusqu'à 7,9 bars (100 psig).
10. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel ladite eau comprend un oxydant.
11. Procédé selon la revendication 1, comprenant, en outre, l'étape de prétraitement desdits
bouts filtres avec un oxydant après leur séparation dudit flux de déchets.
12. Procédé de recyclage de bouts filtres de cigarettes à filtre, ledit procédé comprenant
les étapes consistant à :
fournir un flux de déchets de bouts filtres et de papier, lesdits bouts filtres comprenant
un polymère ester de cellulose ; et
laver les bouts filtres avec de l'eau pour éliminer tout papier lié aux bouts filtres
et pour éliminer tous les contaminants provenant des polymères esters de cellulose,
le rapport de l'eau au polymère ester de cellulose étant compris entre 0,85:1 et 200:1.