[0001] The present invention relates to a laminate suitable for use, for example, with pneumatic
tires having a gas-impermeable layer, such as an inner liner, which is capable of
maintaining a requisite air pressure.
[0002] In accord with the current trends to arouse energy-saving concern, tackle measures
against global warming arising from the release of carbon dioxide and conserve global
environment, it has been earnestly desired to reduce the weight of automobiles and
other machines using a fossil fuel as a power source.
[0003] Conventionally, pneumatic tires have been lined with an inner liner of materials
having relatively low gas-impermeability such as halogenated butyl rubber or the like
to maintain a requisite air pressure. However, halogenated butyl rubber raises a problem
as associated with its great hysteresis loss. For example, referring to FIG. 1 attached
hereto, a rubber portion b of the carcass layer, on vulcanization of a tire, may become
zigzag at a boundary with an inner liner c, namely at a spacing f between carcass
cords a, a. In this case, on rotation of the tire, the rubber of the inner liner c
may be deformed together with the carcass layer. Consequently, there arises a problem
of increased resistance to rotational motion. For this reason, usually an intermediate
sheet of tie gum involving low hysteresis loss is laid between an inner liner of halogenated
butyl rubber and a carcass layer to unite the two layers. Thus the thickness of a
halogenated butyl rubber inner liner together with the thickness of the intermediate
layer of tie gum adds up to a total thickness exceeding 1 mm (1,000 µm) which in turn
contributes to increased weight of the tire.
[0004] Recently a new technique for reducing the weight of an inner liner in a tire was
proposed. In the proposed pneumatic tire, a gas-impermeable layer such as a polyvinylidene
chloride film, ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer film or the like is laminated over
the inner periphery of the tire so as to form an adhesive layer therebetween such
as a polyolefin film, aliphatic polyamide film, polyuretahne film or the like (Japanese
Unexamined Patent Publication No. 40207/1994).
[0005] However, if the inner liner disclosed in the publication is comprised of laminated
films like a polyolefin film/gas-impermeable film/polyolefin film (intermediate layers
omitted), the vulcanization temperature must be lowered to a range which does not
fuse or damage the inner liner, because said laminated films melt and fracture at
a usual vulcanization temperature (about 180°C at the surface of inner liner in a
passenger car). Moreover, when a tire is held under a great load for a prolonged period,
the laminated films of resins melting at 180°C or higher (such as a polyamide resin,
polyester resin or the like) would tend to peel off from the inner periphery of the
tire because of low adhesion.
[0006] Further, if an ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer film or a polyvinylidene chloride
film is used as a gas barrier layer (gas-impermeable layer) in the proposed tire,
such film, which have low flexibility, tends to impair and readily become brittle
on vulcanization. Moreover, the gas released from the rubber is liable to create bubbles
and foams between the film and the rubber layer or within the film. For these reasons,
the proposed tire is undesirable.
[0007] In view of the foregoing situation, an object of the invention is to provide a laminate
comprising a laminated film and a rubber layer, the laminate being suitable for use
as a component of a pneumatic tire and having an air pressure retentivity sufficient
to retain the required air pressure in the tire, and high heat resistance, endurance
and strength, and the laminated film being bonded as a gas-impermeable layer to the
rubber of carcass layer to reduce the weight of the tire.
[0008] According to the present invention, there is provided a laminate comprising a laminated
film and a rubber layer (R), the laminated film being comprised of a gas barrier layer
(A) and an adhesive layer (B), the layer (B) being provided on at least one side of
the layer (A), the layer (A) being formed of at least one member selected from the
group consisting of polyamide resins, polyester resins, polyarylate resins, polyamide-based
alloys and polyester-based alloys, the laminated film being irradiated with an electron
beam, and the adhesive layer (B) being heat-bonded to the rubber layer (R) (hereinafter
referred to as "laminate I").
[0009] According to the invention, there is also provided a laminate comprising a laminated
film and a rubber layer (R), the laminated film being comprised of a rubber-adhering
layer (D), an adhesive layer (B) and a gas barrier layer (A), the layers (D), (B)
and (A) being laminated in this order with a structure of at least three layers, the
rubber-adhering layer (D) being formed of at least one polyolefin resin, the gas barrier
layer (A) being formed of at least one member selected from the group consisting of
polyamide resins, polyester resins, polyarylate resins, polyamide-based alloys and
polyester-based alloys, the laminated film being irradiated with an electron beam,
and the rubber-adhering layer (D) being heat-bonded to the rubber layer (R) (hereinafter
referred to as "laminate II").
[0010] The laminates I and II of the present invention are excellent in the adhesion to
the rubber and in the mechanical strength (flex cracking resistance), air pressure
retentivity, heat resistance, etc.
[0011] When a tire having the laminate I or II inside is vulcanized with heating at a temperature
of, e.g. 180°C, the laminated film of the laminate, because of their high heat resistance,
are unlikely to melt or fracture at their surface, resulting in an increased molding
efficiency. The laminated film of the laminates I and II, which are tough although
thin, contribute to reduced weight of the tire, and provide a tire with high endurance.
[0012] The gas barrier (A) having air pressure retentivity is formed in the invention from
at least one resin selected from the group consisting of polyamide resins, polyester
resins, polyarylate resins, polyamide-based alloys and polyester-based alloys.
[0013] Examples of useful polyamide resins are aliphatic polyamide resins, amorphous polyamide
resins, aromatic polyamide resins, and blends thereof.
[0014] Useful aliphatic polyamide resins can be any of suitable resins having no aromatic
ring in the main chain and/or side chain. Specific examples are nylon 6, nylon 66,
nylon 610, nylon 12 and like polyamides, nylon 6-66 copolymers, nylon 6-610 copolymers
and like copolyamides, nylon 66-polyethylene glycol block copolymers, nylon 6-polypropylene
glycol block copolymers and like polyamide-based elastomers.
[0015] Useful aromatic polyamide resins can be any of suitable resins having an aromatic
ring in the main chain and/or side chain, such as polyxylylene-based polymers prepared
by polycondensation of meta- or para-xylylenediamine with a dicarboxylic acid having
4 to 12 carbon atoms. Such polymers have characteristics such as gas barrier properties,
low water-absorbing capacity, low moisture permeability, etc.
[0016] The term "amorphous polyamide resins" used herein refers to non-crystallizable or
scarcely crystallizable polyamide resins but without specific limitation. Specific
examples are copolymers or terpolymers composed of terephthalic acid, isophthalic
acid or like dicarboxylic acids and hexamethylenediamine or like diamines. Such amorphous
polyamide resins are excellent in the gas barrier properties at high humidities.
[0017] Useful polyester resins include, for example, polyester-based resins composed of
a dicarboxylic acid component and a diol component. Examples of dicarboxylic acid
components are aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, aromatic dicarboxylic acids, alicyclic
dicarboxylic acids and mixtures thereof. More specific examples of aliphatic dicarboxylic
acids are adipic acid, sebasic acid, dodecanoic acid, etc. which have 2 to 20 carbon
atoms. Useful aromatic dicarboxylic acids are, for example, terephthalic acid, isophthalic
acid, naphthalenedi-carboxylic acid, etc. Useful alicyclic dicarboxyic acids are,
for example, cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, etc. Useful diol components are aliphatic
glycols, alicyclic glycols and mixtures thereof. Specific examples of aliphatic glycols
are ethylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, 1,10-decanediol,
etc. Specific examples of alicyclic glycols are 1,4-cyclohexanediol, etc. Polyester
resins for use in the invention include, for example, polybutylene terephthalate-polytetramethylene
oxide glycol block copolymers, polybutylene terephthalate-polycaprolactone block copolymers,
etc.
[0018] Useful polyarylate resins are, for example, polyesters of bivalent phenol with aromatic
dibasic acid, etc. More specific examples include copolymers of bisphenol A with terephthalic
acid/isophthalic acid, etc.
[0019] Examples of polyamide-based alloys and polyester-based alloys are polymer-based alloys
prepared by kneading a sea component and an island component, optionally in the presence
of a compatibilizing agent. The sea component to be used in the invention is at least
one member selected from said polyamide resins and polyester resins, and the island
component to be used in the invention is at least one member selected from suitable
thermoplastic resins such as polyphenylene ether (PPE), polyarylate (PAR) and polycarbonate
(PC).
[0020] Preferred examples of polymer-based alloys are those having a sea-island structure,
such as polyphenylene ether/polyamide alloy, polyarylate/polyamide alloy, polycarbonate/polyamide
alloy, polyphenylene ether/polyester alloy, polyarylate/polyester alloy and polycarbonate/polyester
alloy. Optionally a suitable third component may be added to the polyamide resins,
polyester resins, polyarylate resins, or alloys. In the practice of the invention,
it is possible to use polymer-blended alloys other than the polymer-based alloys of
sea-island structure. These alloys are included in the range of alloys useful in the
invention.
[0021] In the above preparation of alloys, useful compatibilizing agents are not critical
and include, for example, block or random copolymers having an affinity for the sea
component or the island component, styrene-maleic anhydride copolymers, polyphenylene
ether-maleic anhydride-modified copolymers, arylate-maleic anhydride copolymers, epoxy-containing
styrene polymers, etc. The amount of the compatibilizing agent used is not specifically
limited but usually in the range of about 1 to about 5% by weight based on the total
amount of at least one member selected from polyamide resins and polyester resins,
and at least one member selected from suitable thermoplastic resins such as polyphenylene
ether (PPE), polyarylate (PAR) and polycarbonate (PC).
[0022] Of the above polyamide resins, nylon 6, nylon 66, etc. are preferable, and of the
above polyester resins, polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polyethylene terephthalate
(PET), etc. are preferable. Useful polyphenylene ethers are not specifically limited,
and include polymers containing poly(2,6-dimethylphenylene oxide) as a main component
and having an ether bond. Useful polyarylates include, for example, polyesters of
bivalent phenol with aromatic dibasic acid, etc., such as polyesters of bisphenol
A with terephthalic acid/isophthalic acid. Useful polycarbonates are polymers prepared
by interfacial polycondensation of sodium salt of bisphenol A with phosgene, or polymers
prepared by ester exchange of bisphenol A with diphenyl carbonate.
[0023] Useful resins for forming the gas barrier layer (A) in the invention include, for
example, polyamide resins, polyester resins, polyarylate resins, polyamide-based alloys
and polyester-based alloys. These resins can be used singly or in mixture with each
other.
[0024] The adhesive layer (B) formed in the invention is provided to adhere to the gas barrier
layer (A) and the rubber layer (R) or to adhere to the gas barrier layer (A) and the
rubber-adhering layer (D). Typical adhesive resins for producing the adhesive layer
(B) include, for example, modified polymers prepared by copolymerizing or graft-copolymerizing
a homopolymer or copolymer of olefins with maleic acid, fumaric acid, acrylic acid
or like unsaturated carboxylic acid, anhydrides, esters, metal salts or like derivatives
thereof, and other modified polymers such as ethylene glycidyl methacrylate-methyl
acrylate terpolymers, ethylene-ethyl acrylate-maleic anhydride terpolymers, etc. The
term "modified polymer" used herein includes a mixture of said modified polymers with
other components such as other polyolefin resins. Further, these adhesive resins can
be used in mixture with each other. A suitable adhesive agent can be used for forming
the adhesive layer (B).
[0025] Examples of useful polyolefin resins as the component of said modified polymers are
homopolymers of olefins, copolymers of olefins with each other, copolymers of olefins
with other copolymerizable monomers, such as vinyl monomers, and mixtures thereof.
More specific examples of such polyolefin resins are polyethylenes having low to high
densities [including linear low-density polyethylenes (LLDPE), and very low-density
polyethylenes (VLDPE)], polypropylene, polybutene, copolymers thereof with each other,
ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA), ethylene-ethyl acrylate copolymers (EEA),
ethylene-acrylic acid copolymers (EAA), ethylene-methyl acrylate copolymers (EMA),
ethylene-methyl methacrylate copolymers (EMMA), ethylene-methacrylic acid copolymers
(EMAA), etc. In the present invention, these polyolefin resins can be used singly
or at least two of them are usable in mixture. Polyolefin resins usable in the invention
include mixtures of such polyolefin resins with a suitable elastomer, e.g. ethylene-propylene
elastomer, a small amount of styrene elastomer or the like.
[0026] The rubber-adhering layer (D) formed in the invention is provided to adhere to the
rubber layer or the like, for example, superposed on the inner periphery of a tire.
Polyolefin resins for forming the rubber-adhering layer (D) are homopolymers of olefins,
copolymers of olefins with each other, copolymers of olefins with other copolymerizable
monomers, such as other vinyl monomers, and mixtures thereof. More specific examples
of such polyolefin resins are polyethylenes having low to high densities (including
linear low-density polyethylenes (LLDPE), and very low-density polyethylenes (VLDPE)),
polypropylene, polybutene and copolymers thereof with each other, ethylene-vinyl acetate
copolymers (EVA), ethylene-ethyl acrylate copolymers (EEA), ethylene-acrylic acid
copolymers (EAA), ethylene-methyl acrylate copolymers (EMA), ethylene-methyl methacrylate
copolymers (EMMA), ethylene-methacrylic acid copolymers (EMAA), etc. In the present
invention, these polyolefin resins can be used singly or at least two of them are
usable in mixture. Polyolefin resins usable in the invention include mixtures of such
polyolefin resins with a suitable elastomer, e.g. ethylene-propylene elastomer, a
small amount of styrene elastomer or the like.
[0027] There is no restriction on the composition of the rubber layer (R) (corresponding
to the carcass layer in FIG. 3). Useful rubber compositions comprise at least one
member selected from the group consisting of diene-based rubbers, hydrogenated diene-based
rubbers, olefin-based rubbers, halogen-containing rubbers and thermoplastic elastomers.
Examples of diene-based rubbers and hydrogenated diene-based rubbers are natural rubbers,
polyisoprene rubbers, epoxidized natural rubbers, styrene-butadiene copolymer rubbers,
polybutadiene rubbers (high-cis or low-cis butadiene rubbers), acrylonitrile-butadiene
rubbers, hydrogenated acrylonitrile-butadiene rubbers, hydrogenated styrene-butadiene
rubbers, etc. Typical of olefin-based rubbers are ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymer
rubbers (EPDM, EPM, etc.), maleic acid-modified ethylene-propylene copolymer rubbers
(M-EPM), IIR, copolymers of isobutyrene and aromatic vinyl or diene-based monomers,
etc. Exemplary of halogen-containing rubbers are butyl bromide rubbers, chlorinated
butyl rubbers, bromide of isobutylene-p-methyl styrene copolymer (Br-IPMS), chlorosulfonated
polyethylene (CSM), chlorinated polyethylene (CM), maleic acid-modified chlorinated
polyethylene (M-CM), etc. Illustrative of thermoplastic elastomers are styrene-based
elastomers, olefin-based elastomers and ester-based elastomers, etc. The rubber composition
may contain additives such as carbon black, process oil, vulcanizing agents, etc.
The rubber layer (R), although sufficient in strength, may contain reinforcements
such as carcass cords embedded therein. The rubber layer (R) formed in the invention
includes all of such rubber layers. A layer of suitable material may be deposited,
of course, on the other side than the side of the rubber layer heat-bonded to the
laminated film. The carcass layer 2 contains the rubber portion b (rubber coating)
and the carcass cords a. However, in respect of the tires, the carcass layer 2 is
treated herein as an equivalent of the rubber layer (R) to facilitate understanding.
[0028] FIG. 1 is a schematic cross section showing a rubber portion of the carcass layer
which may become zigzag at a boundary with an inner liner between carcass cords due
to the vulcanization of a conventional tire.
[0029] FIG. 2 is a fragmentary view showing the pneumatic tire of the invention in half
section taken in the meridian direction.
[0030] FIG. 3 is an enlarged sectional view of X portion of FIG. 2.
[0031] FIG. 4 is an enlarged sectional view showing a spliced portion of the inner liner
in the tire of the invention.
[0032] FIG. 5 is an enlarged sectional view showing another embodiment of the spliced portion
of the inner liner in the tire of the invention.
[0033] FIG. 6 is an enlarged sectional view of X portion of FIG. 2.
[0034] FIG. 7 is an enlarged sectional view showing the spliced portion of the inner liner
in the tire of the invention.
[0035] FIG. 8 is an enlarged sectional view showing another embodiment of the spliced portion
of the inner liner in the tire of the invention.
[0036] In the drawings, a carcass cord is designated a; a rubber portion of the carcass
layer, b; an inner liner, c; a bead core, 1; a carcass layer, 2; an inner liner, 3;
a side wall, 4; a spliced portion, 5; a belt layer, 6; a gas barrier layer, (A); an
adhesive layer, (B); and a rubber-adhering layer, (C).
[0037] The structure of the pneumatic tire according to the invention is described below
in more detail with reference to FIG. 2.
[0038] In FIG. 2, a carcass layer 2 is laid between a pair of bead cores 1, 1 at left and
right sides. An inner liner 3 is formed on the inner periphery of the carcass layer
2 inside of the tire, while a side wall 4 is disposed on the outer periphery of the
carcass layer 2.
[0039] First, the laminate I is described below.
[0040] FIG. 3 is an enlarged sectional view of X portion of FIG. 2. An inner liner 3 is
comprised of a laminated film comprising a gas barrier layer (A) and an adhesive layer(s)
(B). The adhesive layer (B) is made of a modified polyolefin resin or the like and
is laminated on at least one surface of the gas barrier layer (A). The gas barrier
layer (A) is formed of at least one member selected from the group consisting of polyamide
resins, polyester resins, polyarylate resins, polyamide-based alloys and polyester-based
alloys.
[0041] The adhesive layer (B) of the laminate I may be formed, as stated above, of a modified
polyolefin resin. A modified polyolefin resin may melt or a film of this resin may
fracture at a vulcanization temperature depending on the type of the resin. To avoid
this objection, the adhesive layer (B) of the laminated film is essentially crosslinked
for reinforcement in the practice of the invention. The crosslinking can be effected
by irradiating one side or preferably both sides of the laminated film with an electron
beam.
[0042] The thickness of the laminated film in the laminate I is at least 10 µm, preferably
25 to 200 µm, more preferably 50 to 150 µm. If the thickness is less than 10 µm, an
increased air permeability results. For example, if the laminated film of such thickness
are used for the inner liner of a pneumatic tire, the retentivity of air pressure
is reduced, whereby it is made unlikley to maintain a requisite air pressure. The
thickness of the laminated film is not specifically limited, and may be, of course,
outside said range of film thickness, if necessary.
[0043] The thickness of the adhesive layer (B) to be bonded to the rubber layer (R) in the
laminate I is in the range of 5 to 200 µm, preferably 10 to 100 µm, more preferably
15 to 80 µm. A thickness of less than 5 µm lowers the adhesion of the layer (B) to
the rubber layer (R), whereas a thickness of more than 200 µm tends to make the layer
(B) rigid. Thus the thickness outside said range is undesirable. The thickness of
the gas barrier layer (A) should be sufficient, for example, to sustain a requisite
air pressure. The thickness of the layer (A) is preferably at least 3 µm, more preferably
3 to 50 µm. A thickness of less than 3 µm decreases the air pressure retentivity,
making it unlikely to maintain the required air pressure.
[0044] The thickness of the rubber layer (R) to be bonded to the adhesive layer (B) is variable
depending on the purpose of use and is not specifically limited. For example, when
the rubber layer is used as the carcass layer of the tire, a suitable thickness may
be about 0.5 to abut 2.0 mm.
[0045] A preferred embodiment of the laminate I according to the invention comprises the
rubber layer (R) and laminated film having at least 2-layer structure. For example,
the adhesive layer (B) is laminated on the gas barrier layer (A) while the rubber
layer (R) is laminated on the adhesive layer (B). That is to say, the embodiment has
a structure of (A)/(B)/(R) or (B)/(A)/(B)/(R). Optionally the laminate (I) may have
at least one suitable intermediate layer sandwiched between the layers (A)/(B). A
specific example of such structure is a combination of (B
1)/(B
2)/(A)/(B
2)/(B
1)/(R). In this structure, the layers (B
1) and (B
2) may be, of course, made of the same or different adhesive resins.
[0046] To produce a tire using the laminate I, the laminate I is arranged, for example,
on the inner periphery of the tire as described later, and the tire is vulcanized
and molded in a suitable manner. In this case, the adhesive layer (B) is heat-bonded
to the rubber layer (R) during vulcanization. In this way, usually the heating adhesion
is performed concurrently with vulcanization. Of course, the heating adhesion may
be carried out independently of vulcanization. The heating adhesion is effected preferably
at a temperature of about 130 to about 200°C, but the temperature range is not critical.
[0047] A method of preparing the laminated films in the laminate I is described below.
[0048] The laminated film of the laminate I are formed in a tubular form by an inflation
method or in a flat from by a T-die co-extrusion method, respectively using a proper
device such as a co-extrusion device, without specific limitation. When required,
the laminated film may be stretched. Stretching is carried out, for example, after
preheating the laminated film cooled after the formation, by various methods such
as sequentially biaxial stretching, concurrently biaxial stretching, concurrently
biaxial tube-stretching, stretching by a separate procedure, melt-stretching, etc.
[0049] According to the invention, the draw ratio is not specifically limited. For example,
the laminated film can be drawn to more than 1 times to 4 times, preferably more than
1 times to 2 times, the length and/or the width of the film. The drawing temperature
is not critical, but usually in the range of about 100 to about 200°C, preferably
about 120 to about 180°C.
[0050] Optionally the laminated film may be thermally fixed by conventional methods, as
by being thermally fixed at a higher temperature than the drawing temperature after
stretching while being relaxed widthwise of the film by several percents. However,
the fixing method is not specifically limited.
[0051] Lamination methods are not critical in the practice of the invention and include
various methods in addition to the co-extrusion method described above. For example,
a pressure heating adhesion method is available which comprises separately forming
an adhesive layer and a gas barrier layer, while optionally forming an anchor coating.
Another extrusion lamination method is employable. It comprises depositing a melt
of resins for forming an adhesive layer by extrusion on the surface of a gas barrier
layer, while optionally forming an anchor coating.
[0052] According to the invention, the laminated film with the adhesive layer (B) superposed
on at least one side of the gas barrier layer (A) are essentially crosslinked to improve
the heat resistance and to increase the adhesion between the layers (A) and (B).
[0053] Preferably the crosslinking is conducted by irradiating at least one surface, preferably
both surfaces, of the laminated film with an electron beam. In crosslinking the laminated
film having the layers (B) on both sides thereof, the laminated film are desirably
irradiated at both sides with an electron beam. Optionally an electron beam crosslinking
agent, such as triallyl isocyanurate, triallyl cyanurate, trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate,
etc. may be incorporated into a suitable layer of the laminated film. The amount of
such crosslinking agent used is not critical, but is about 1 to about 5 parts by weight
per 100 parts by weight of the material used for said layer. When an electron beam
crosslinking agent is used, the exposure dose can be reduced.
[0054] The laminated film is irradiated on at least one side with an electron beam in a
dose of up to 40 Mrad, preferably 5 to 15 Mrad at an accelerating voltage of at least
150 kV, preferably 150 to 250 kV, more preferably 200 to 250 kV. When an electron
beam crosslinking agent is used, the exposure dose is up to 40 Mrad, preferably 0.1
to 40 Mrad, more preferably 1 to 20 Mrad.
[0055] An accelerating voltage of less than 150 kV is unlikely to expose the laminated film
to uniform irradiation of electron beam from the front side to the rear side of the
film and is hence undesirable. An exposure dose exceeding 40 Mrad is liable to reduce
the adhesion to the rubber layer (R) and is hence undesirable.
[0056] The laminated film thus irradiated with an electron beam are crosslinked at the layer
(B) and are improved in the film strength and heat resistance.
[0057] To produce the pneumatic tire according to the invention, the laminated film are
wound around a drum for forming a tire. Subsequently a carcass layer, a side wall,
bead cores, bead apexes, a steel belt layer, and a tread rubber layer are laminated
over each other in a conventional manner to form a green tire of unvulcanized rubber.
Then the green tire is placed into a mold and vulcanized and molded in a conventional
manner while the film are heat-bonded. In this way, an inner liner comprised of the
laminated film can be superposed on the inner periphery of the carcass layer 2 inside
the tire. It is possible in the practice of the invention to further incorporate a
rubber layer (R') of tie gum or the like between the carcass layer 2 and the adhesive
layer (B). In this structure, a combination of layers is partly shown as "carcass
layer 2/rubber layer (R')/adhesive layer (B)..." wherein the rubber layer (R) may
be double arranged.
[0058] When the adhesive layer (B) is formed at both peripheries of the inner liner 3, the
adhesive layers (B), (B) are brought into contact with each other at a spliced portion
5 of the inner liner 3 as shown in FIG. 4. Thus the layers (B), (B) can be firmly
bonded together when heated and the air pressure retentivity can be increased. Further,
this structure can eliminate the possibility that a bladder placed inside the tire
in vulcanization may come into direct contact with the gas barrier layer (A). Consequently
the gas barrier layer (A) can be thermally and mechanically protected.
[0059] Another tire forming method is available. The method comprises the steps of laminating
the laminated film on the carcass layer 2, winding the prelaminated layer (laminated
film plus carcass layer) around a tire forming drum, superposing a side wall, bead
cores, bead apexes, a steel belt layer, and a tread rubber layer over each other in
a conventional manner to give a green tire of unvulcanized rubber, placing the green
tire into a mold, and vulcanizing the green tire in a conventional manner while the
film are heat-bonded. In this case, when the adhesive layer (B) is arranged at both
peripheries of the laminate I, it is possible to prevent the gas barrier layer (A)
from being directly heat-bonded to the carcass layer 2 at the spliced portion 5 of
the inner liner 3 as shown in FIG. 5. In this case, a high adhesion can be imparted.
[0060] The foregoing inner liner is a layer capable of inhibiting the penetration of a gas,
as set forth above and may be formed at an intermediate portion of a pneumatic tire
although termed with a restrictive word "inner".
[0061] Next, the laminate II is described below.
[0062] FIG. 6 is an enlarged view of X portion of FIG. 2. An inner liner 3 is comprised
of laminated film comprising a gas barrier layer (A), adhesive layers (B) and rubber-adhering
layers (D). The gas barrier layer (A) is formed of at least one member selected from
the group consisting of polyamide resins, polyester resins, polyarylate resins, polyamide-based
alloys and polyester-based alloys. The adhesive layer (B) is made of a modified polyolefin
resin or the like and is laminated on both peripheries of the gas barrier layer (A).
The layer (D) is formed of a polyolefin resin or the like and may be laid on both
peripheries of the layer (B). The layer (B) is bonded indirectly to the carcass layer
2 since the layer (D) is interposed therebetween.
[0063] The rubber-adhering layer (D) of polyolefin resin in the laminate II may pose a problem.
A polyolefin resin may melt and the film of this resin may fracture at a vulcanization
temperature depending on the type of the resin. To avoid this objection, the rubber-adhering
layer (D) and the adhesive layer (B) are essentially crosslinked for reinforcement.
The crosslinking can be effected by irradiating one periphery, preferably both peripheries,
of the laminated film with an electron beam.
[0064] The thickness of the laminated film essentially having the rubber layer (D) in the
laminate II is 20 to 300 µm, preferably 25 to 200 µm, more preferably 50 to 150 µm.
If the thickness is less than 20 µm, an increased air permeability results. For example,
if the laminated film of such thickness is used for the inner liner of a pneumatic
tire, the retentivity of air pressure is reduced, whereby it is made unlikley to maintain
a requisite air pressure. A thickness of more than 300 µm is unliable to impart the
desired flexibility. Thus a greater or smaller thickness of the laminated film in
the laminate II than said range is undesirable.
[0065] The thickness of the rubber-adhering layer (D) to be bonded to the rubber is in the
range of 5 to 200 µm, preferably 10 to 100 µm, more preferably 15 to 80 µm. A thickness
of less than 5 µm lowers the adhesion of of the layer (D) to the rubber, whereas a
thickness of more than 200 µm tends to make the layer (D) rigid. Hence the thickness
outside said range is undesirable. The thickness of the adhesive layer (B) in the
laminate II is in the range sufficient to bond the layer (D) to the layer (A), and
is preferably up to 3 µm. The thickness of the gas barrier layer (A) is in the range
sufficient, for example, to retain a requisite air pressure, and is preferably at
least 3 µm, preferably 3 to 50 µm. A thickness of less than 3 µm reduces the air pressure
retentivity, resulting in an unlikelihood of maintaining a requisite air pressure.
Therefore, the thickness of the layer (A) outside said rage is undesirable.
[0066] The thickness of the rubber layer (R) to be bonded to the rubber-adhering layer (D)
is variable depending on the purpose of use and is not specifically limited. For example,
when the rubber layer is used as the carcass layer of the tire, a suitable thickness
may be about 0.5 to abut 2.0 mm.
[0067] A preferred embodiment of the laminate II according to the invention comprises a
laminated film having the following structure. The adhesive layer (B) is present between
the gas barrier layer (A) and rubber-adhering layer (D). The layers (D), (D) are provided
as two external layers and the rubber layer (R) can be further laminated thereon.
That is, the embodiment has a structure of (D)/(B)/(A)/(B)/(D)/(R), or (A)/(B)/(D)/(R).
The laminate (II) may have a suitable intermediate layer, optionally two or more intermediate
layers, interposed between the layers (D)/(B)/(A). A specific example of such structure
is a combination of (A)/(B
1)/(B
2)/(D)/(R). In this structure, the layers (B
1) and (B
2) may be, of course, made of the same or different adhesive resins.
[0068] To produce a tire using the laminate II, the laminate II is mounted, for example,
on the inner periphery of the tire as described later, and the tire is vulcanized
in a suitable manner. In the practice of the invention, the rubber-adhering layer
(D) is heat-bonded to the rubber layer (R) during vulcanization. In this way, usually
the heating adhesion is performed concurrently with vulcanization. Of course, the
heating adhesion may be carried out independently of vulcanization. The heating adhesion
is effected preferably at a temperature of about 130 to about 200°C, but the temperature
range is not critical.
[0069] A method of preparing the laminated film in the laminate II is described below.
[0070] The laminated film of the laminate II are formed in a tubular form by an inflation
method or in a flat from by a T-die co-extrusion method, respectively using a proper
device such as a co-extrusion device, without specific limitation. When required,
the laminated film may be stretched. Stretching is carried out, for example, after
preheating the laminated film cooled after the formation, by various methods such
as sequentially biaxial stretching, concurrently biaxial stretching, concurrently
biaxial tube-stretching, stretching involving a separate procedure, melt-stretching,
etc.
[0071] According to the invention, the draw ratio is not specifically limited. For example,
the laminated film can be drawn to more than 1 to 4 times, preferably more than 1
to 2 times, the length and the width respectively of the film. The drawing temperature
is not critical, but usually in the range of about 100 to about 200°C, preferably
about 120 to about 180°C.
[0072] When required, the laminated film may be thermally fixed by conventional methods,
as by being thermally fixed at a higher temperature than the drawing temperature after
stretching while being relaxed widthwise of the film by several percents. However,
the fixing method is not specifically limited.
[0073] Lamination methods are not critical in the practice of the invention and include
various methods in addition to the co-extrusion method described above. For example,
a pressure heating adhesion method is available which comprises separately forming
a rubber-adhering layer and a gas barrier layer so as to produce an adhesive layer
between said layers. There is a dry laminating method comprising laminating layers
and forming intermediate layers of an adhesive agent therebetween. Another extrusion
lamination method is employable. It comprises depositing a melt of resins for rubber-adhering
layers by extrusion on the surface of a gas barrier layer so as to produce adhesive
layers between the layers.
[0074] It is essential in the invention, as described hereinbefore, to crosslink the laminated
film in order to improve the heat resistance.
[0075] Preferably the crosslinking is conducted by irradiating at least one surface of the
laminated film with an electron beam. In crosslinking the laminated film having the
layer (D) on both sides thereof, the laminated film are desirably irradiated at both
sides with an electron beam. Optionally an electron beam crosslinking agent, such
as triallyl isocyanurate, triallyl cyanurate, trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate,
etc. may be incorporated into a suitable layer of the laminated film. The amount of
such crosslinking agent used is not critical, but is about 1 to about 5 parts by weight
per 100 parts by weight of the material used for said layer. When an electron beam
crosslinking agent is used, the exposure dose can be reduced.
[0076] The laminated film are irradiated on at least one side with an electron beam in a
dose of up to 40 Mrad, preferably 5 to 15 Mrad at an accelerating voltage of at least
150 kV, preferably 150 to 250 kV, more preferably 200 to 250 kV. When an electron
beam crosslinking agent is used, the exposure dose is up to 40 Mrad, preferably 0.1
to 40 Mrad, more preferably 1 to 20 Mrad.
[0077] An accelerating voltage of less than 150 kV is unlikely to expose the laminated film
to uniform irradiation of electron beam from the front side to the rear side of the
film and is hence undesirable. An exposure dose exceeding 40 Mrad is liable to reduce
the adhesion to the rubber layer (R) and is hence undesirable.
[0078] The laminated film thus irradiated with an electron beam are crosslinked at the rubber-adhering
layer (D) and the adhesive layer (B) and are improved in the film strength and heat
resistance.
[0079] To produce the pneumatic tire according to the invention, the laminated film are
wound around a drum for forming a tire. Subsequently a carcass layer, a side wall,
bead cores, bead apexes, steel belt layer, and a tread rubber layer are laminated
over each other in a conventional manner to form a green tire of unvulcanized rubber.
Then the green tire is placed into a mold and vulcanized while the film are heat-bonded
in a conventional manner. In this way, the inner liner 3 comprised of the laminated
film can be superposed on the inner periphery of the carcass layer 2 inside the tire.
It is possible in the practice of the invention to incorporate a rubber layer (R')
of tie gum or the like between the carcass layer 2 and the rubber-adhering layer (D).
In this structure, a combination of layers is partly shown as "carcass layer 2/rubber
layer (R')/rubber-adhering layer (D)..." wherein the rubber layer (R) may be double
arranged.
[0080] When the rubber-adhering layer is formed at both peripheries of the inner liner 3,
the layers (D), (D) are brought into contact with each other at a spliced portion
5 of the inner liner 3 as shown in FIG. 7. Thus the layers (D), (D) can be firmly
bonded together when heated and the air pressure retentivity can be increased. Further,
this structure can eliminate the possibility that a bladder placed inside the tire
in vulcanization may come into direct contact with the gas barrier layer (A). Consequently
the gas barrier layer (A) can be thermally and mechanically protected.
[0081] Another tire forming method is usable. It comprises the steps of laminating the laminated
film on the carcass layer 2, winding the prelaminated layer (laminated film plus carcass
layer) around a tire forming drum, superposing a side wall, bead cores, bead apexes,
a steel belt layer, and a tread rubber layer over each other in a conventional manner
to give a green tire of unvulcanized rubber, placing the green tire into a mold, and
vulcanizing the green tire in a conventional manner while the film are heat-bonded.
In this case, when the rubber adhering layer (D) is arranged at both peripheries of
the laminate II, it is possible to prevent the gas barrier layer (A) from being directly
heat-bonded to the carcass layer 2 at the spliced portion 5 of the inner liner 3 as
shown in FIG. 8, whereby a high adhesion can be imparted.
[0082] The foregoing inner liner is a layer capable of inhibiting the penetration of a gas,
as set forth above and may be formed at an intermediate portion of a pneumatic tire,
irrespectively of a restrictive word "inner".
[0083] Described above are preferred embodiments of the present invention. It is a matter
of course that other embodiments are employable and various modifications are possible
without the deviation from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
[0084] According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a laminate comprising
laminated film and a rubber layer (R), the laminated film being comprised of a gas
barrier layer (A) and an adhesive layer (B), the layer (B) being provided on at least
one side of the layer (A), the layer (A) being formed of at least one member selected
from the group consisting of polyamide resins, polyester resins, polyarylate resins,
polyamide-based alloys and polyester-based alloys, the laminated film being irradiated
with an electron beam, and the adhesive layer (B) being heat-bonded to the rubber
layer (R).
[0085] According to another aspect of the invention, there is also provided a laminate comprising
laminated film and a rubber layer (R), the laminated film being comprised of a rubber-adhering
layer (D), an adhesive layer (B) and a gas barrier layer (A), the layers (D), (B)
and (A) being laminated in this order with a structure of at least three layers, the
rubber layer (R) being formed of at least one polyolefin resin, the gas barrier layer
(A) being formed of at least one member selected from the group consisting of polyamide
resins, polyester resins, polyarylate resins, polyamide-based alloys and polyester-based
alloys, the laminated film being irradiated with an electron beam, and the rubber-adhering
layer (D) being heat-bonded to the rubber layer (R).
[0086] The laminated film of the laminates I and II are irradiated with an electron beam.
The laminates I and II are excellent in the film strength, adhesion to the rubber,
gas impermeability (gas barrier properties), heat resistance, etc. These laminates
can be used as the inner layer of a pneumatic tire (e.g. inner liner + carcass layer)
and contribute to reduced weight of the tire.
[0087] Examples and Comparative Examples are given below to clarify the invention in more
detail. The invention, however, is not limited to the Examples at all.
Examples 1 to 4 and Comparative Example 1
Adhesion Test
[0088] The laminated film was subjected to confirmatory tests for the adhesion to rubbers.
(1) Composition and preparation of test rubbers
[0089] The composition of test rubbers is shown below in Table 1.
(i) Preparation of test rubbers with compositions 1 to 7:
Masterbatches were made by mixing together the other components than a vulcanizing
accelerator and sulfur using a closed type mixer. The standard mixing time was 3.5
minutes and the maximum temperature for mixing was 150°C. The other components were
added to each masterbatch using an open roll, giving an unvulcanized test rubber.
(ii) Preparation of test rubbers with composition 8:
Masterbatches were made by mixing together the other components than zinc flower,
a vulcanizing accelerator and sulfur using a closed type mixer. The standard mixing
time was 3.5 minutes and the maximum temperature for mixing was 150°C. The other components
were added to each masterbatch using an open roll, giving an unvulcanized test rubber.

[0090] The components shown in Table 1 are specifically set forth below.
NR: trade name "RSS #1"
SBR: trade name "NIPOL 1502," product of Nippon Zeon Co., Ltd.
BR: trade name "NIPOL BR 1220," product of Nippon Zeon Co., Ltd.
EPT: trade name "ESPLEIN 505 A," product of Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
Br-IIR: trade name "EXXON BROMOBUTYL 2244," product of Exxon Chemical Japan Ltd.
Carbon Black FEF: trade name "HTC 100," product of Chubu Carbon Co., Ltd.
RD: trade name "NOCRAC 224," (antioxidant), product of Oh-uchi Shinko Chemical Industrial
Co., Ltd.
DM: trade name "NOCCELLER DM," (vulcanizing accelerator), product of Oh-uchi Shinko
Chemical Industrial Co., Ltd.
(2) Test films
[0091] Three-layer laminated films were produced by laminating a gas barrier layer (A) and
adhesive layers (B) each formed from the components shown in Table 2. The laminated
films were prepared by co-extrusion and irradiated at both sides with an electron
beam in a dose of 15 Mrad at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The thickness of the
laminated films was 96 µm ((B)/(A)/(B)= 30/36/30 µm). The laminated film of Comparative
Example 1 were not exposed to an electron beam since the film were heat resistant.
(3) Preparation of samples for adhesion test and method of adhesion test
[0092] Samples were prepared and tested according to JIS K 6256. The samples were prepared
by laminating rubber layers in the order of fabric-reinforced rubber/unvulcanized
test rubber/test film/unvulcanized test rubber/fabric-reinforced rubber. The laminated
films were vulcanized at 180°C for 10 minutes and cut to 25 mm-wide rectangular sheets.
The samples were placed on a peel tester, and the tester was operated with a gripper
movable at a speed of 50.0 ± 5.0 mm/min to measure the peel strength between the laminated
films and the test rubber. The other tests were carried out according to JIS K6256.
Table 2 shows the results of adhesion test.

[0093] The desired adhesive strength between the test film and the test rubber is usually
at least 0.5 N/mm. As apparent from Table 2, the films of Examples 1 to 4 exceeded
said adhesive strength range while the film of Comparative Example 1 was below said
adhesive strength range.
Example 5
[0094] Three-layer laminated film for a tire with a size of 185/65 R14 was prepared by co-extrusion
so as to laminate adhesive layers (B) of ethylene-ethyl acrylate-maleic anhydride
terpolymer on both sides of a gas barrier layer (A) of nylon 66 in the structure of
FIG. 2. The laminated film was irradiated at both sides with an electron beam in a
dose of 15 Mrad at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The thickness of the laminated
film was 96 µm ((B)/(A)/(B) =30/36/30 µm).
[0095] The laminated film thus obtained were used as an inner liner. An unvulcanized tire
with said inner liner laminated on the carcass layer 2 was vulcanized at 180°C for
10 minutes to heat-bond the adhesive layer (B) to the carcass layer 2, giving a finished
tire. Table 3 shows the visual evaluation of the obtained tire, visual evaluation
of the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements
of the tire weight.

[0096] The rubber composition used for the carcass layer had the formulation as shown below
in Table 4. The carcass layer had an array of polyester cords embedded in the rubber
composition.
Table 4
Component |
Part by weight |
Natural rubber |
80.0 |
SBR 1502 |
20.0 |
Carbon black FEF |
50.0 |
Stearic acid |
2.0 |
Zinc flower |
3.0 |
Sulfur |
3.0 |
Vulcanizing accelerator (NS) |
1.0 |
Aromatic oil |
2.0 |
[0097] In the Examples, the laminated films were evaluated or measured by the following
methods in respect of the test items indicated in the tables.
Evaluation after vulcanization
[0098] The inner periphery of the tire was visually inspected and evaluated after vulcanization.
If no abnormality was found, the result of evaluation was expressed with "Good". If
an abnormality was detected, it was represented with a word "Impaired" and specifically
described.
Evaluation after indoor endurance test
[0099] The indoor endurance test was carried out under the following conditions by the method
described below. The inner periphery of the tire was visually inspected after the
test. An flawless tire was indicated with a word "Good", while an impaired tire was
expressed with a word "Impaired". The impairment of the tire was specifically set
forth.
[0100] The conditions for indoor endurance test, the test method, and the criteria for evaluation
are as follows.
Rim: 14 X 5½-J
Air pressure: 140 kPa Load: 6 kN
Room temperature: 38°C
[0101] The tire was let to travel at a speed of 80 km/h on a drum of 1707 mm in diameter.
After travel over a distance of 10000 km, the inner periphery of the tire was visually
evaluated. The tires were rated as rejects if cracking, flaking, floating layer or
the like was detected.
Degree of air leakage
[0102] An air leakage test was performed as follows. The tire was fitted on a rim measuring
14 X 5½-J at room temperature (21°C) and let to stand still for 48 hours under an
internal pressure of 200 kPa. Then the internal pressure was readjusted to 200 kPa.
The internal internal pressure was measured every 4 days over a period of 3 months
starting immediately after the readjustment.
[0103] An air leakage coefficient α was calculated according to the formula

wherein P
t is a measurement of pressure, P
0 is an initial pressure and t is the number of days.
[0104] A ratio (β) of reduction in the internal pressure over a period of one month (%/month)
was calculated by substituting 30 (days) for t according to the equation

wherein β is the ratio of reduction in the internal pressure and t is the number
of days.
Examples 6 to 8
[0105] The procedure of Example 5 was repeated with the exception of using an inner liner
formed from the components shown in Table 3. Table 3 shows the visual evaluation of
the obtained tire, visual evaluation of the tire after indoor endurance test, results
of air leakage test, and measurements of the tire weight.
Comparative Example 2
[0106] A tire was produced in the same manner as in Example 5 with the exception of using
an inner liner formed from the components shown in Table 3 without exposure to an
electron beam. Table 3 shows the visual evaluation of the obtained tire, visual evaluation
of the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements
of the tire weight.
Comparative Example 3
[0107] A tire was produced in the same manner as in Example 5 with the exception of using
an inner liner formed from the components shown in Table 3 without exposure to an
electron beam. Table 3 shows the visual evaluation of the obtained tire, visual evaluation
of the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements
of the tire weight.
Comparative Example 4
[0108] A tire was prepared by laminating, on the inner periphery of a green tire, a 500
µm-thick inner liner of unvulcanized butyl rubber having the composition shown in
Table 5 so as to form an intermediate layer of tie gum about 700 µm in thickness therebetween.
The green tire was vulcanized under the same conditions as in Example 5. Table 3 shows
the visual evaluation of the tire after vulcanization, visual evaluation of the tire
after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements of the
tire weight.
Table 5
Component |
Part by weight |
Butyl bromide rubber |
100.0 |
Carbon black FEF |
50.0 |
Stearic acid |
1.0 |
Zinc flower |
3.0 |
Sulfur |
1.0 |
Vulcanizing accelerator (DM) |
1.0 |
Aromatic oil |
10.0 |
[0109] As apparent from Table 3, no impairment was found in the inner liners on the tires
of Examples 5 to 8 after vulcanization and after indoor endurance test. These inner
liners were comparable or superior in the degree of air leakage to inner liners of
butyl rubber. A 7.6% decrease of the tire weight was realized by a 1/5 reduction in
the thickness of the inner liners.
[0110] The tire of Comparative Example 2 produced without exposure to an electron beam was
rated as unacceptable after indoor endurance test. Hence it was improper.
[0111] The inner liner of Comparative Example 3 produced without exposure to an electron
beam created bubbles although otherwise in accord with the requirements of the invention
and was evaluated as unacceptable after vulcanization. Hence it was improper.
Examples 9 and 10
[0112] The procedure of Example 5 was repeated except that the gas barrier layers (A) had
the thicknesses shown in Table 6. Table 6 shows the visual evaluation of the obtained
tire, visual evaluation of the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage
test, and measurements of the tire weight.
Table 6
|
Example 9 |
Example 10 |
Thickness of layer (A) |
3 µm |
50 µm |
Electron beam irradiation |
Irradiated |
Irradiated |
Evaluation after vulcanization |
Good |
Good |
Evaluation after indoor endurance test |
Good |
Good |
Degree of air leakage (%/month) |
2.7 |
1.6 |
Tire weight (Kg) (%) |
7.3
(92.4) |
7.3
(9.4) |
Examples 11 to 13
[0113] The procedure of Example 5 was repeated with the exception of forming inner liners
from the components shown in Table 7. Table 7 shows the visual evaluation of the obtained
tire, visual evaluation of the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage
test, and measurements of the tire weight.

Examples 14 to 16 and Comparative Example 5
[0114] Tires were produced in the same manner as in Example 5 except that the laminated
film was produced by exposure to an electron beam in a dose of 5 Mrad, 20 Mrad and
40 Mrad, respectively at an accelerating voltage of 150 kV, 200 kV and 250 kV, respectively
in Examples 14, 15 and 16, or without exposure to an electron beam in Comparative
Example 5. Table 8 below shows the visual evaluation of the obtained tire, visual
evaluation of the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and
measurements of the tire weight.
Table 8
|
Example 14 |
Example 15 |
Example 16 |
Comp.Ex. -5 |
Accelerating voltage/Exposure dose |
150 kV
5 Mrad |
200 kV
20 Mrad |
250 kV
40 Mrad |
Non-irradiated |
Evaluation after vulcanization |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Impaired* |
Evaluation after indoor endurance test |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unevaluated** |
Degree of air leakage (%/month) |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
7.0 |
Tire weight |
|
|
|
|
(Kg)
(%) |
7.3
(92.4) |
7.3
(92.4) |
7.3
(92.4) |
7.3
(92.4) |
Note:
*=Melted and fractured |
**=The inner liner surface was impaired (unevaluated). |
[0115] As apparent from Table 8, the inner liners of the invention were kept from fracture
due to the exposure to an electron beam. The resulting tires had inner liners excellent
in the adhesion to the carcass layer. Examples 17 and 18
[0116] Three-layer laminated film for a tire with a size of 185/65 R14 was prepared by co-extrusion
so as to laminate adhesive layers (B) of ethylene-ethyl acrylate copolymer (100 parts
by weight of copolymer used) containing 3 parts by weight of triallyl isocyanurate
(TAIC) in the structure of FIG. 2 on both sides of a gas barrier layer (A) of nylon
66. The laminated film was irradiated at both sides with an electron beam under the
conditions shown in Table 9. The thickness of the laminated film was 96 µm ((B)/(A)/(B)
=30/36/30 µm).
[0117] The laminated film thus obtained was used as inner liners. Unvulcanized tires with
said inner liner laminated on the carcass layer 2 were vulcanized at 180°C for 10
minutes to heat-bond the adhesive layer (B) to the carcass layer 2, giving a finished
tire. Table 9 shows the visual evaluation of the obtained tire, visual evaluation
of the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements
of the tire weight.
[0118] The rubber composition used for the carcass layer had the formulation as shown above
in Table 4. The carcass layer had an array of polyester cords embedded in the rubber
composition.
Table 9
|
Example 17 |
Example 18 |
Layer (A) (gas barrier layer) Thickness=36µm |
Nylon 66 |
Nylon 66 |
Layer (B) (adhesive layer) Thickness=30 µm |
Ethylene-ethyl acrylate-maleic anhydride terpolymer/TAIC |
Ethylene-ethyl acrylate-maleic anhydride terpolymer/TAIC |
Accelerating voltage/Exposure dose |
150 kV 0.5 Mrad |
150 kV 3.0 Mrad |
Evaluation after vulcanization |
Good |
Good |
Evaluation after indoor endurance test |
Good |
Good |
Degree of air leakage (%/month) |
1.9 |
1.9 |
Tire weight |
|
|
(Kg)
(%) |
7.3
(92.4) |
7.3
(92.4) |
[0119] As apparent from Table 9, because of TAIC incorporated in the adhesive layer (B),
the inner liners of the invention were kept from fracture although exposed to only
a small dose (0.5 Mrad) of an electron beam, and were imparted a high adhesion to
the carcass layer.
Example 19
[0120] Five-layer laminated film for a tire with a size of 185/65 R14 was formed by laminating,
in the structure of FIG. 2, rubber-adhering layers (D) of ethylene-ethyl acrylate
copolymer (EEA), adhesive layers (B) of ethylene-ethyl acrylate-maleic anhydride terpolymer
(modified ethylene-acrylic acid copolymer) and a gas barrier layer (A) of nylon 66.
The lamination was conducted as follows. A T-die was connected to 5 extruders independently
operable. Among the five extruders, the resin for the rubber-adhering layers (D) was
supplied to two extruders, the resin for the adhesive layers (B) to two extruders,
and the resin for the gas barrier layer (A) to the other extruder. After co-extrusion,
the molten laminated 5 layers were quenched with a roll cooled with water, giving
a laminated film of 5 flat layers with a structure of (D)/(B)/(A)/(B)/(D). The thickness
of the laminated film was 100 µm ((D)/(B)/(A)/(B)/(D) =30/2/36/2/30 µm). Subsequently
the laminated film was irradiated at both sides with an electron beam in a dose of
15 Mrad at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV, whereby the laminated film was crosslinked.
[0122] The rubber composition used for the carcass layer had the formulation as shown above
in Table 4. The carcass layer had an array of polyester cords embedded in the rubber
composition.
Comparative Examples 6 to 8
[0123] The procedure of Example 19 was repeated with the exception of forming inner liners
from the components shown in Table 10. Table 10 shows the visual evaluation of the
obtained tire, visual evaluation of the tire after indoor endurance test, results
of air leakage test, and measurements of the tire weight.
Comparative Example 9
[0124] A tire was produced by repeating the procedure of Example 19 with the exception of
forming an inner liner from the components shown in Table 10 without exposure to an
electron beam. Table 10 shows the visual evaluation of the obtained tire, visual evaluation
of the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements
of the tire weight.
Comparative Example 10
[0125] A tire was produced by laminating, on the inner periphery of a green tire, a 500
µm-thick inner liner of unvulcanized butyl rubber having the formulation shown in
Table 5 so as to form an intermediate layer of tie gum about 700 µm in thickness therebetween.
The green tire was vulcanized under the same conditions as in Example 19. Table 10
shows the visual evaluation of the tire after vulcanization, visual evaluation of
the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements
of the tire weight.
[0126] As apparent from Table 10, no impairment was found in the inner liner of Example
19 after vulcanization and after indoor endurance. The inner liner of Example 19 was
comparable or superior in the degree of air leakage to inner liners of butyl rubber.
A 7.6% decrease of the tire weight was realized by a 1/5 reduction in the thickness
of the inner liner of Example 19.
[0127] In the inner liners of Comparative Examples 6 to 8, at least one of the layers (D),
(B) and (A) deviated from the scope of the invention. The inner liners were found
unacceptable after indoor endurance test. Hence they were improper.
[0128] The inner liner of Comparative Example 9, which met the structural requirements of
the invention, caused bubbles because of non-exposure to an electron beam. The inner
liner was evaluated as unacceptable after vulcanization. Namely it was improper.
Example 20
[0129] A tire was produced in the same manner as in Example 19 except that the gas barrier
layer (A) of the laminated film was composed of polyphenylene ether/polyamide (nylon
6) alloy ("ARTLEY Y 20S," product of Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.). Table 11 shows
the visual evaluation of the tire after vulcanization, visual evaluation of the tire
after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements of the
tire weight.
Examples 21 to 23
[0130] Tires were produced in the same manner as in Example 20 except that the gas barrier
layer (A) of the laminated film was composed of polyethylene terephthalate, polyacrylate
or polyphenylene ether/polyester (polybutylene terephthalate) alloy ("DIA• Alloy TX-70A,"
product of Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.), the rubber-adhering layer (D) was formed from
an ethylene-methyl methacrylate copolymer (EMMA) and the adhesive layer (B) was made
of low-density maleic anhydride-modified polyethylene. Table 11 below shows the visual
evaluation of the tire after vulcanization, visual evaluation of the tire after indoor
endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements of the tire weight.

[0131] As apparent from Table 11, even when the gas barrier (A) of the laminated film in
the tire was composed of polyphenylene ether/polyamide alloy, polyethylene terephthalate,
polyacrylate or polyphenylene ether/polyester alloy, no impairment was found in the
inner liners after vulcanization and after indoor endurance as in Example 19. The
inner liners were comparable or superior in the degree of air leakage to the conventional
inner liner of butyl rubber indicated in Comparative Example 6. A 7.6% decrease of
the tire weight was achieved as a result of a 1/5 reduction in the thickness of the
inner liner.
Examples 24 and 25
[0132] Tires were produced in the same manner as in Example 19 except that the gas barrier
layers (A) of the laminated film used as the inner liners had the thicknesses indicated
in Table 12. Table 12 shows the visual evaluation of the tire after vulcanization,
visual evaluation of the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage
test, and measurements of the tire weight.
Comparative Example 11
[0133] A tire was produced in the same manner as in Example 19 except that the gas barrier
layer (A) of the laminated film used as the inner liner had the thickness indicated
in Table 12. Table 12 shows the visual evaluation of the tire after vulcanization,
visual evaluation of the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage
test, and measurements of the tire weight.
Table 12
Inner liner |
Example 24 |
Example 25 |
Comparative Example 11 |
Thickness of layer (A) |
3 µm |
50 µm |
2 µm |
Electron beam irradiation |
Irradiated |
Irradiated |
Irradiated |
Evaluation after vulcanization |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Evaluation after indoor endurance test |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Degree of air leakage (%/month) |
2.7 |
1.7 |
2.9 |
Tire weight |
|
|
|
(Kg)
(%) |
7.3
(92.4) |
7.3
(92.4) |
7.3
(92.4) |
[0134] As apparent from Table 12, when the gas barrier layer (A) of the laminated film was
at least 3 µm in thickness, there was provided a tire which was comparable or superior
in the air pressure retentivity to tires with inner liners of butyl rubber.
Examples 26 and 27
[0135] Tires were produced in the same manner as in Example 19 except that the gas barrier
layers (A) of the laminated film were composed of the polyphenylene ether/polyamide
alloy used in Example 20 and the polyphenylene ether/polyester alloy used in Example
23, respectively and had the thicknesses indicated in Table 13. Table 13 shows the
visual evaluation of the tire after vulcanization, visual evaluation of the tire after
indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements of the tire weight.
Table 13
Inner liner |
Example 26 |
Example 27 |
Layer (A) |
Polyphenylene ether/polyamide alloy |
Polyphenylene ether/polyester alloy |
Thickness of layer (A) |
3 µm |
3 µm |
Electron beam irradiation |
Irradiated |
Irradiated |
Evaluation after vulcanization |
Good |
Good |
Evaluation after indoor endurance test |
Good |
Good |
Degree of air leakage (%/month) |
2.7 |
2.6 |
Tire weight |
|
|
(Kg)
(%) |
7.3
(92.4) |
7.3
(92.4) |
[0136] As apparent from Table 13, even when the gas barrier layers (A) of the laminated
film were composed of polyphenylene ether/polyamide alloy and polyphenylene ether/polyester
alloy, respectively, the resulting tires with the layers (A) of at least 3 µm thickness
were comparable or superior in the air pressure retentivity to the tire of Comparative
Example 10 having the inner liner of butyl rubber, and were excellent in the heat
resistance.
Examples 28 to 30
[0137] Five-layer laminated film for a tire with a size of 185/65 R14 was produced. The
inner liners comprised rubber-adhering layers (D) of linear low-density polyethylene
(LLDPE), adhesive layers (B) of linear low-density maleic anhydride-modified polyethylene
(modified LLDPE), and a gas barrier layer (A) of nylon 66 in the structure as shown
in FIG. 2. The lamination was conducted as follows. A T-die was connected to 5- extruders
independently operable. Among the five extruders, the resin for the rubber-adhering
layers (D) was supplied to two extruders, the resin for the adhesive layers (B) to
two extruders, and the resin for the gas barrier layer (A) to the other extruder.
After co-extrusion, the molten laminated 5 layers were quenched with a roll cooled
with water, giving laminated film composed of 5 flat layers with a structure of (D)/(B)/
(A)/(B)/(D). The thickness of the laminated film was 100 µm ((D)/(B)/(A)/(B)/(D)=30/2/36/2/30
µm). Subsequently the laminated film were irradiated at both sides with an electron
beam in a dose of 5, 20 and 40 Mrad at an accelerating voltage of 150, 200 and 250
kV, respectively as shown in Table 14. Tires were produced by the same subsequent
procedure as in Example 19. Table 14 below shows the visual evaluation of the tire
after vulcanization, visual evaluation of the tire after indoor endurance test, results
of air leakage test, and measurements of the tire weight.
Comparative Examples 12 to 14
[0138] Tires were produced in the same manner as in Examples 28 to 30 with the exception
of difference in non-exposure or exposure to an electron beam in a dose of 4 or 45
Mrad at an accelerating voltage of 140 or 250 kV as shown in Table 14. Table 14 shows
the visual evaluation of the tire after vulcanization, visual evaluation of the tire
after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements of the
tire weight.

[0139] As apparent from Table 14, the laminated films of Examples 28 to 30 were irradiated
with an electron beam in a dose of 5 to 40 Mrad at an accelerating voltage of 150
to 250 kV, and thereby made free of fracture. The obtained tires were provided with
the inner liners having an increased adhesion to the carcass layer.
Examples 31 to 33
[0140] Three different laminated films were produced in the same manner as in Examples 28
to 30 except that the gas barrier layer (A) of the laminated films was composed of
polyphenylene ether/polyamide alloy. The laminated films were irradiated with an electron
beam in a dose of 5, 20 and 40 Mrad at an accelerating voltage of 150, 200 and 250
kV, respectively. Using the laminated films, tires were produced by the same procedure
as in Example 19. Table 15 shows the visual evaluation of the tire after vulcanization,
visual evaluation of the tire after indoor endurance test, results of air leakage
test, and measurements of the tire weight.
Comparative Examples 15 and 16
[0141] Tires were produced in the same manner as in Examples 31 to 33 with the exception
of difference in non-exposure or exposure to an electron beam in a dose of 100 Mrad
at an accelerating voltage of 250 kV as shown in Table 15. Table 15 shows the visual
evaluation of the tire after vulcanization, visual evaluation of the tire after indoor
endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements of the tire weight.

[0142] As apparent from Table 15, the inner liners formed of polyamide-based alloy according
to the invention were kept from fracture due to the exposure to an electron beam in
a dose of 40 Mrad or less. The inner liners were imparted an increased adhesion to
the carcass layer.
Examples 34 and 35
[0143] A 5-layer laminated film for a tire with a size of 185/65 R14 was formed by laminating,
in the structure of FIG. 2, rubber-adhering layers (D) of ethylene-ethyl acrylate
copolymer (EEA) (100 parts by weight used) containing 3 parts by weight of triallyl
isocyanurate (TAIC), adhesive layers (B) of ethylene-ethyl acrylate-maleic anhydride
terpolymer (100 parts by weight used) containing 3 parts by weight of TAIC and a gas
barrier layer (A) of nylon 66. The lamination was conducted as follows. A T-die was
connected to 5 extruders independently operable. Among the five extruders, the resin
for the rubber-adhering layers (D) was supplied to two extruders, the resin for the
adhesive layers (B) to two extruders, and the resin for the gas barrier layer (A)
to the other extruder. After co-extrusion, the molten laminated 5 layers were quenched
with a roll cooled with water, giving a laminated film composed of 5 flat layers with
a structure of (D)/(B)/(A)/(B)/(D). The thickness of the laminated film was 100 µm
((D)/(B)/(A)/(B)/(D) =30/2/36/2/30 µm). Subsequently the laminated film was irradiated
at both sides with an electron beam in the dose and at the accelerating voltage shown
in Table 16. Tires were produced in the same manner as in Example 19. Table 16 below
shows the visual evaluation of the obtained tire, visual evaluation of the tire after
indoor endurance test, results of air leakage test, and measurements of the tire weight.
Table 16
Inner liner |
Example 34 |
Example 35 |
Layer (D) (thickness=30 µm) |
EEA/TAIC |
EEA/TAIC |
Layer (B) (Thickness=30 µm) |
Ethylene-ethyl acrylate-maleic anhydride terpolymer/TAIC |
Ethylene-ethyl acrylate-maleic anhydride terpolymer/TAIC |
Layer (A) (Thickness=30 µm) |
Nylon 66 |
Nylon 66 |
Accelerating voltage/Exposure dose |
150 kV 0.5 Mrad |
150 kV 3.0 Mrad |
Evaluation after vulcanization |
Good |
Good |
Evaluation after indoor endurance test |
Good |
Good |
Degree of air leakage (%/month) |
1.9 |
1.9 |
Tire weight |
|
|
(Kg)
(%) |
7.3
(92.4) |
7.3
(92.4) |
[0144] As apparent from Table 16, because of TAIC incorporated in the rubber-adhering layers
(D) and the adhesive layers (B), the inner liners of the invention were kept from
fracture although exposed to only a small dose (0.5 Mrad) of an electron beam, and
were imparted a high adhesion to the carcass layer.