BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to a steel to be subjected to carburizing and carbonitriding
for the use in gears and shafts, which are required to have high pitting fatigue strength
and high impact strength.
2. Description of the Related Art
[0002] Examples of conventional techniques aimed at reducing the grain-boundary oxide phases,
which may cause fatigue cracks, in order to achieve higher flexural fatigue strength
include those that entail reducing the content of elements more readily oxidizable
than Fe (such as Si, Mn, and Cr) and adjusting hardenability and mechanical properties
by means of elements less readily oxidizable than Fe (such as Ni and Mo); and those
that entail obtaining surface-compression residual stress by employing shot peening
to delay the spreading of fatigue cracks. According to some reports, adding Si or
V in order to improve pitting fatigue strength has been studied as a promising means
because of its ability to improve flexural fatigue strength.
[0003] Gears and shafts that are more compact and lightweight and are capable of withstanding
higher levels of stress loading are currently needed in order to be able to reduce
the weight and to increase the engine output of automobiles and industrial machinery.
Improved pitting fatigue strength and impact strength are needed as a result. With
the conventional techniques, however, it is difficult to achieve both goals at the
same time.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] In view of these drawbacks, it is an object of the present invention to simultaneously
improve pitting fatigue strength and impact strength merely by adjusting the chemical
composition of steel.
[0005] The means for attaining the stated object resides in improving the temper hardness
of the carburized or carbonitrided steel by increasing the Si content thereof, and
in improving the fracture toughness of the carburized layer and the core by adding
Ni and Mo either singly or in combination thereof.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009]
Fig. 1 is a diagram depicting the shape of the test piece used for evaluating temper
hardness;
Fig. 2 is a diagram depicting the shape of the test piece used for evaluating carburization
impact strength;
Fig. 3 is a diagram illustrating the treatment conditions of carburizing, quenching,
and tempering;
Fig. 4 is a graph depicting the relation between temper hardness and Si content;
Fig. 5 is a graph depicting the relation between carburization impact strength and
Si content;
Fig. 6 is a graph depicting the relation between carburization impact strength and
temper hardness;
Fig. 7 is a schematic of a roller/pitting fatigue tester;
Fig. 8 is a diagram depicting the shape of the roller/pitting fatigue test piece;
Fig. 9 is a diagram depicting the shape of a loading roller for the roller/pitting
fatigue tester; and
Fig. 10 is a diagram depicting the relation between pitting fatigue life and carburization
impact strength.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0010] As a result of painstaking research into pitting fatigue strength and impact strength,
the inventors discovered a method in which strength can be improved in the generally
possible chemical compositional range as carburizing and carbonitriding steels by
adjusting their chemical composition.
[0011] The primary goal of adjusting these chemical components is to improve temper hardness
by increasing the Si content and to improve the fracture toughness of the carburized
layer and the core by adding Ni and Mo either singly or in combination thereof.
[0012] Extensive research involving numerous experiments had been conducted before this
discovery was made. An example is shown below. According to past research, temper
hardness and carburization impact strength are the most important factors that govern
the pitting fatigue and impact strength of carburized gears. Table 1 shows the chemical
compositions of inventive and comparative steels used to evaluate these factors.

[0013] In the table, "first inventive steel", "second inventive steel" and "third inventive
steel" correspond to the above-prescribed first feature, second feature and third
feature, respectively, of the present invention. These types of steel were melted
in a highfrequency vacuum melting furnace. The ingots thus obtained were heated to
1250°C, cogged to a diameter of 30 mm, and normalized at 925°C. The blanks were machined,
yielding a single test piece, having a shape shown in Fig. 1, for evaluating temper
hardness and three test pieces, shaped as shown in Fig. 2, for evaluating impact strength.
All these test pieces were carburized, quenched, and tempered under the conditions
shown in Fig. 3.
[0014] The test piece for determining temper hardness shown in Fig. 1 was air-cooled after
being kept for 8 hours in an electric furnace heated at 250°C under conditions simulating
those under which frictional heat is generated during the rolling of a gear. The air-cooled
test pieces were cut perpendicular to the longitudinal direction, hardness was measured
every 10 µm with a Microvickers hardness meter up to a depth of 50 µm from the surface
at two arbitrary locations (at 90° intervals), and the results were averaged. These
results are shown in Table 1 above as post-temper hardness values. The three test
pieces, shown in Fig. 2, for each of different steels for determining carburizing
impact were subjected to Charpy impact tests, and average Charpy impact values were
calculated. These results are shown in Table 1 above as carburization impact strength
values. The data are described in detail below.
[0015] Fig. 4 shows the relation between temper hardness and Si content. It can be seen
in the drawing that when the Si content is 0.40 wt% or higher, the temper hardness
is 700 HV or greater, which is higher than the temper hardness of a steel product
having an Si content lower than 0.40 wt%. This is because surface hardness can be
kept at a high level (even after tempering has been performed under conditions simulating
those created when frictional heat is generated during the rolling of a gear) by increasing
the Si content, which enhances tempering/softening resistance as previously indicated.
Fig. 5 shows the relation between carburization impact strength and Si content. It
can be seen that when the combined content of Ni and Mo is less than 0.30 wt%, carburization
impact strength decreases with increase in the Si content. This is attributed to the
fact that the fracture toughness of the carburized layer and the core decreases due
to increased Si content. It can also be seen that even when the combined content of
Ni and Mo is 0.30 wt% or more, carburization impact strength decreases slightly with
increased Si content, but the rate of this increase is much lower than that observed
when the combined content of Ni and Mo is less than 0.30 wt%. This is attributed to
the fact that the fracture toughness of the carburized layer and the core can be kept
at a high level by adding Ni or Mo despite increased Si content. It can thus be seen
that high temper hardness and carburization impact strength can be obtained within
the range of the present invention, where the Si content is 0.40 wt% or higher and
the Ni + Mo parameter, which is equal to the combined content of Ni and Mo, is 0.30
wt% or higher.
[0016] The above-described relationships are illustrated in Fig. 6, which depicts the relation
between temper hardness and carburization impact strength. It can be seen that the
inventive steel is much more beneficial than a comparative steel, for achieving higher
temper hardness and carburization impact strength.
[0017] The present invention is based on the above-described research results. Described
below are the reasons for setting limits to the chemical composition of the present
invention. The chemical composition of gear steel is adjusted in a variety of ways
with consideration for the factors related to the operating environment, such as gear
size, load strength, and carburizing or carbonitriding conditions. It has been confirmed
that the present invention provides the above effects in all possible ranges of chemical
compositions, and the following compositional ranges are provided.
C: 0.10 to 0.30 wt%
[0018] At least 0.10 wt% C must be added in order to provide a gear with the required core
strength. An excessive addition, however, makes the core unnecessarily hard and adversely
affects core toughness. To prevent this, the upper limit must be set to 0.30 wt%.
[0019] Consequently, the C addition is confined to a range of 0.10 to 0.30 wt%.
Si: 0.40 to 1.00 wt%
[0020] Si is the most important element of the inventive steel. Specifically, Si is an element
that reduces softening within a temperature range of 200 to 250°C, which a gear or
the like is believed to reach during rolling. To achieve this effect, at least 0.40
wt% must be added. An excessive addition, however, adversely affects not only the
toughness of the carburized layer and the core, but also the cold-forging properties
or machinability due to inhibited carburization or the excessively high hardness of
uncarburized steel materials. To prevent this, the upper limit must be set to 1.00
wt%.
[0021] Consequently, the Si addition is confined to a range of 0.40 to 1.00 wt%.
Mn: 0.30 to 1.50 wt%
[0022] Mn is an element needed to maintain the desired hardenability, and it must be added
in an amount of at least 0.30 wt%. An excessive addition, however, has an adverse
effect on the cold-forging properties or machinability due to the excessively high
hardness of uncarburized steel materials. To prevent this, the upper limit must be
set to 1.50 wt%.
[0023] Consequently, the Mn addition is confined to a range of 0.30 to 1.50 wt%.
P: 0.035 wt% or lower
[0024] P is an element that lowers toughness or fatigue strength by segregating along austenite
grain boundaries and embrittling the grain boundaries. The damage becomes pronounced
at a content of greater than 0.035 wt%.
[0025] Consequently, the P content is set to 0.035 wt% or lower.
Ni: 0.00 to 1.00 wt%
[0026] Together with Mo (described below), Ni is the next most important element of the
inventive steel after Si. Specifically, Ni is an element that improves the fracture
toughness of the carburized layer and the core in the same manner as Mo does.
[0027] Consequently, this element must be added in the absence of an Mo addition. Ni is
an expensive element, however, so adding too much of it is undesirable from the economic
standpoint, and such an addition reduces surface hardness by promoting the formation
of residual austenite, and has an adverse effect on cold-forging properties or machinability
due to the excessively high hardness of uncarburized steel materials. To prevent this,
the upper limit must be set to 1.00 wt%.
[0028] Consequently, the Ni addition is confined to a range of 0.00 to 1.00 wt%.
Cr: 0.30 to 1.50 wt%
[0029] Cr is an element needed to ensure desired hardenability, and it must be added in
an amount of at least 0.30 wt%. An excessive addition, however, has an adverse effect
on the cold-forging properties or machinability due to the excessively high hardness
of uncarburized steel materials. To prevent this, the upper limit must be set to 1.50
wt%.
[0030] Consequently, the Cr addition is confined to a range of 0.30 to 1.50 wt%.
Mo: 0.00 to 1.00 wt%
[0031] Together with Ni (described above), Mo is the next most important element of the
inventive steel after Si. Specifically, Mo is an element that improves the fracture
toughness of the carburized layer and the core in the same manner as Ni does. Consequently,
this element must be added in the absence of an Ni addition. Mo is an expensive element,
however, so adding too much of it is undesirable from the economic standpoint, and
such an addition has an adverse effect on cold-forging properties or machihability
due to the excessively high hardness of uncarburized steel materials. To prevent this,
the upper limit must be set to 1.00 wt%. Occasionally, the need to add this element
may be dispensed with if Ni has been added in the manner described above.
[0032] Consequently, the Mo addition is confined to a range of 0.00 to 1.00 wt%.
Al: 0.010 to 0.035 wt%
[0033] Al is an element that combines with N to form AlN and acts to refine the size of
austenite crystal grains, contributing through this grain-size refinement to improved
toughness for the carburized layer and the core. At least 0.010 wt% of the element
must be added to achieve this effect. An excessive addition, however, promotes the
formation of Al
2O
3 inclusions, which have an adverse effect on the fatigue strength. To prevent this,
the upper limit must be set to 0.035 wt%.
[0034] Consequently, the Al addition is confined to a range of 0.010 to 0.035 wt%.
Nb: 0.001 to 0.050 wt%
[0035] Nb is an element that binds with the C and N in the steel to form carbonitrides,
and is effective for reducing the size of austenite crystal grains in the same manner
as AlN is. Through this grain-size refinement, the element improves the toughness
of the carburized layer and the core. Addition of the element in an amount of at least
0.01% is needed in order to obtain such effects. However, an excessive addition forms
coarse carbonitrides, causes precipitation, and adversely affects the toughness of
the carburized layer. To prevent this, the upper limit must be set to 0.050 wt%.
[0036] Consequently, the Nb addition is confined to a range of 0.001 to 0.050 wt%.
O: 0.0015 wt% or lower
[0037] O is an element that is present in the steel as oxide-based inclusions and that has
an adverse effect on the fatigue strength.
[0038] Consequently, the upper limit for O is set to 0.0015 wt% or lower.
N: 0.0050 to 0.0200 wt%
[0039] N is an element that combines with Al and Nb to form AlN and NbN and acts to reduce
the size of austenite crystal grains, contributing through this gain-size refinement
to improved toughness for the carburized layer and the core. At least 0.0050 wt% of
the element is needed to achieve this effect. An excessive addition causes foaming
on the surface of the steel ingot during solidification and has an adverse effect
on the forgeability of steel materials. To prevent this, the upper limit must be set
to 0.0200 wt%.
[0040] Consequently, the N addition is confined to a range of 0.0050 to 0.0200 wt%.
Parameter expressed as Ni + Mo: 0.30 wt% to 2.00%
[0041] As noted in the corresponding sections, Ni and Mo are elements designed to improve
the fracture toughness of the carburized layer or the core whose fracture toughness
has been reduced by increased Si addition. The parameter expressed as Ni + Mo must
be added in an amount of at least 0.30 wt%. Ni and Mo are expensive, however, so adding
too much of them is undesirable from the economic standpoint, and such an excessive
addition deteriorates the cold-forging properties or machinability due to the excessively
high hardness of uncarburized steel materials. To prevent this, the upper limit of
the combined amount of these elements must be set to 2.00 wt%.
Cu: 0.01 to 0.50 wt%
[0042] Cu is an element that can be expected to have a precipitation hardening effect at
comparatively high temperatures (400 to 600°C). It should therefore be added when
rigorous operation conditions are anticipated (such as those resulting from a marked
increase in the temperature of a gear or a rolling surface) or when there is a possibility
that a high-temperature environment will be created near a jet engine or a turbine,
as in an aircraft material. In order to exhibit this effect, addition of at least
0.01% of Cu is needed. However, an excessive addition promotes hot embrittlement and
impairs carburization. To prevent this, the upper limit must be set to 0.50 wt%.
[0043] Consequently, the Cu addition is confined to a range of 0.01 to 0.50 wt%.
V: 0.01 to 0.50 wt%
[0044] V is an element that forms carbides even at comparatively low temperatures (near
the carburization temperature), and is thus expected to improve hardness and hardenability
at the same time. The element should therefore be added in an amount of at least 0.01%
in order to obtain such effects. However, an excessive addition has an adverse effect
on the toughness of the carburized layer and is undesirable from the economic standpoint
because V is an expensive element. Such an excessive addition also has an adverse
effect on cold-forging properties or machinability due to the excessively high hardness
of uncarburized steel materials. To prevent this, the upper limit must be set to 0.50
wt%.
[0045] Consequently, the V addition is confined to a range of 0.01 to 0.50 wt%.
Ti: 0.005 to 0.050 wt%
[0046] Ti is an element added to prevent situations in which the N in the steel binds with
B (described below), forming BN and reducing the hardenability improvement effect
of B. At least 0.005% addition of the element is therefore needed in order to obtain
such an effect. However, adding a large amount may produce coarse TiN, which serves
as a starting point for fatigue fracturing. It is therefore necessary to set the upper
limit to 0.050 wt%.
[0047] Consequently, the Ti addition is confined to a range of 0.005 to 0.050 wt%.
B: 0.0005 to 0.0050 wt%
[0048] B is an element that improves the hardenability without adversely affecting the cold-forging
properties or machinability of uncarburized steel materials. Addition of the element
in an amount of not less than 0.0005 wt% is therefore needed in order to exhibit this
effect. However, even when more than 0.0050 wt% is added, the effect reaches saturation
and results in reduced hot workability. It is therefore necessary to set the upper
limit to 0.0050 wt%.
[0049] Consequently, the B addition is confined to a range of 0.0005 to 0.0050 wt%.
S: 0.005 to 0.050 wt%
[0050] S is an element that is present in the steel primarily as sulfide-based inclusions
and that is effective for improving the machinability where the steel is used for
components shaped by cutting, such as gears. For this effect, at least 0.005 wt% of
the element should therefore be added. An excessive addition, however, results in
lower fatigue strength. To prevent this, the upper limit must be set to 0.050 wt%.
[0051] Consequently, the S addition is confined to a range of 0.005 to 0.050 wt%.
Pb: 0.01 to 0.09 wt%
[0052] Pb is an element that further improves the machinability as compared with the case
of adding S alone. For this effect, at least 0.01 wt% addition of the element is therefore
needed. An excessive addition of this element, however, results in lower fatigue strength.
At over 0.10 wt%, the handling of Pb is subject to legal restrictions in terms of
dust collection equipment, processes, and the like. To prevent this, the upper limit
must be set to 0.09 wt%.
[0053] Consequently, the Pb addition is confined to a range of 0.01 to 0.09 wt%.
Bi: 0.04 to 0.20 wt%
[0054] Bi is an element that further improves the machinability as compared with the case
of adding S alone. For this effect, at least 0.04 wt% addition of the element is therefore
needed. An excessive addition of this element, however, results in lower toughness.
To prevent this, the upper limit must be set to 0.20 wt%.
[0055] Consequently, the Bi addition is confined to a range of 0.04 to 0.20 wt%.
Te: 0.002 to 0.050 wt%
[0056] Te is an element that further improves the machinability as compared with the case
of adding S alone. For this effect, at least 0.002 wt% of the element should therefore
be added. An excessive addition of this element, however, brings about hot brittleness.
To prevent this, the upper limit must be set to 0.050 wt%.
[0057] Consequently, the Te addition is confined to a range of 0.002 to 0.050 wt%.
Zr: 0.01 to 0.20 wt%
[0058] Zr is an element that further improves the machinability as compared with the case
of adding S alone. For this effect, at least 0.01 wt% of the element should therefore
be added. An excessive addition of this element results in lower toughness, however.
To prevent this, the upper limit must be set to 0.20 wt%.
[0059] Consequently, the Zr addition is confined to a range of 0.01 to 0.20 wt%.
Ca: 0.0001 to 0.0100 wt%
[0060] Ca is an element that further improves the machinability as compared with the case
of adding S alone. For this effect, at least 0.0001 wt% of the element should therefore
be added. An excessive addition of this element results in lower toughness, however.
To prevent this, the upper limit must be set to 0.0100 wt%.
[0061] Consequently, the Ca addition is confined to a range of 0.0001 to 0.0100 wt%.
[0062] The present invention will now be described in further detail through specific embodiments.
Table 2 shows the chemical compositions of inventive steels obtained in actual furnaces
on the basis of the above-described data, as well as chemical compositions of comparative
steels used for comparison purposes.

[0063] In the table, Inventive Steel A is a boron-free steel, and Inventive Steel B is a
boron-containing steel. In addition, Comparative Steel I is SNCM420H specified in
Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS), and Comparative Steel H is a steel based on SCM420H
(JIS) and obtained by increasing the Si content.
[0064] These steels were subjected to roller/pitting fatigue tests and carburization impact
tests, and the pitting fatigue life and carburization impact strength thereof were
evaluated. Fig. 7 is a schematic of the roller/pitting fatigue tester used. In this
figure, 1 is a test piece, 2 is a loading roller, 3 and 4 are meshing gears, 5 is
a bearing, 6 is a coupling, 7 is a transmission belt, and 8 is a motor. Fig. 8 depicts
the shape of the roller/pitting fatigue test piece, and Fig. 9 depicts the shape of
the loading roller for the roller/pitting fatigue tester.
[0065] The inventive and comparative steels were first hot-forged to a diameter of 30 mm
and were then normalized, yielding five roller/pitting fatigue test pieces such as
the one shown in Fig. 8, and five carburization impact test pieces such as the one
shown in Fig. 2. These test pieces were subsequently carburized, quenched, and tempered
under the conditions shown in Fig. 3.
[0066] The roller/pitting fatigue test pieces were subjected to the roller pitting fatigue
test under the conditions shown in Table 3, and their pitting fatigue life was determined.
The carburization impact test pieces were subjected to a Charpy impact test, and their
carburization impact strength was determined. The results are shown in Table 4. In
the roller/pitting fatigue test, 20.00 × 10
6 rolling cycles were performed, and the test was completed if no pitting had occurred.
The results shown in Table 4 are summarized in Fig. 10.
Table 3
Items |
Specifics |
Maximum Hertzian Stress |
2940 MPa |
Slip rate |
-40% |
Rotational speed |
1000 r.p.m. |
Lubricating oil |
Engine oil (Komatsu Genuine Oil EO-30-CD) |
Lubricating oil temperature |
50°C |
Large roller/crowning diameter |
300 mmR |
Table 4
|
Pitting fatigue life (× 106) |
Carburization impact strength (J/cm2) |
|
n=1 |
n=2 |
n=3 |
n=4 |
n=5 |
n=1 |
n=2 |
n=3 |
n=4 |
n=5 |
Inventive Steel A |
20.00* |
20.00* |
20.00* |
20.00* |
20.00* |
35.3 |
36.1 |
32.8 |
33.1 |
37.7 |
Inventive Steel B |
20.00* |
20.00* |
20.00* |
20.00* |
20.00* |
30.1 |
34.2 |
32.2 |
31.6 |
34.0 |
Comparative Steel I |
0.75 |
0.66 |
0.51 |
0.47 |
0.38 |
35.5 |
32.1 |
32.0 |
33.0 |
34.8 |
Comparative Steel H |
15.70* |
20.00* |
13.30 |
20.00* |
20.00* |
8.9 |
15.2 |
12.2 |
11.1 |
7.8 |
* Tests were completed without any pitting being noted. |
[0067] It can thus be seen that Inventive Steels A and B have a pitting fatigue life of
20.00 × 10
6 or greater, and a carburization impact strength of 30 J/cm
2 or greater. Comparative Steel I has a carburization impact strength of 30 J/cm
2 or greater but possesses a short pitting fatigue life. In addition, Comparative Steel
H has an adequate pitting fatigue life but possesses low carburization impact strength.
[0068] It was thus confirmed that the inventive steel has high pitting fatigue strength
and improved impact strength.
[0069] Thus, the present invention allows both pitting fatigue strength and impact strength
to be improved merely by adjusting the chemical composition of steel, allowing the
stated object to be attained.
[0070] Consequently, the present invention is effective for reducing the size and weight
of carburized gears in current manufacturing processes and in achieving higher outputs
with the same sizes and shapes, greatly contributing to reduced costs and improved
reliability in gear-related industrial applications.