Background Art
[0001] The present invention relates to free cutting alloy excellent in machinability.
[0002] Alloy has widespread applications because of a variety of characteristics thereof.
A free cutting alloy excellent in machinability is, in a case, selected for improvement
of productivity. In order to improve machinability, for example, free cutting alloy
containing an element improving machinability such as S, Pb, Se or Bi (hereinafter
referred to as machinability-improving element) is widely used. Especially in a case
where machinability is particularly required because of precise finishing in machining
or for other reasons, not only is a content of such a machinability-improving element
increased in an alloy, but the elements are also added to an alloy in combination.
[0003] While S, which has widely been used for improvement of machinability, is in many
cases added in the form of MnS, addition thereof in an alloy in a large content causes
for degrading corrosion resistivity, hot workability and cold workability of the alloy.
Moreover, when the alloy is exposed to the air, a sulfur component included in the
alloy is released into the air in the form of a sulfur containing gas, which causes
sulfur contamination in peripheral areas of parts with ease. Therefore, there arises
a necessity of suppressing release of sulfur containing gas (hereinafter referred
to as improvement on out-gas resistivity). Elements such as S, Se and Te, however,
deteriorate magnetic properties to a great extent in an electromagnetic stainless
steel and the like.
[0004] Therefore, various proposals have been made: a Mn content is limited, a Cr content
in sulfide is increased or in a case where S is contained, Ti is added in combination
with S in order to disperse sulfide in the shape of a sphere (for example, see JP-A-98-46292
or JP-A-81-16653). To increase a Cr content in sulfide, however, tends to greatly
decrease in machinability and hot workability and therefore, such a alloy has been
restricted on its application in many cases.
[0005] R. Kiessling et al. "Non metallic inclusions in steel", 1978 relates to sulphide
inclusions in steel.
[0006] GB 1 519 313 relates to a stainless steel alloy and to a ferritic free-machining
steel having an excellent machinability and a high corrosion resistance.
[0007] It is accordingly an object of the present invention is to provide free cutting alloy
excellent in machinability, showing outstanding characteristics as an alloy such as
corrosion resistivity, hot workability and cold workability or specific magnetic characteristics,
which are comparable to those of conventional alloys.
Summary of the Invention
[0008] In order to achieve the above described object, a free cutting alloy of the present
invention is characterized by the free cutting alloy of claim 1. (Ti,Zr)" means one
or two of Ti and Zr.
[0009] Machinability of an alloy can be improved by forming the above described (Ti, Zr)
based compound in a matrix metal phase of the alloy. Furthermore, by forming this
compound in the alloy, formation of compounds such as MnS and (Mn,Cr)S, easy to reduce
corrosion resistivity and hot workability of the alloy, can be prevented or suppressed,
thereby enabling corrosion resistivity, hot workability and cold workability to be
retained at good levels. That is, according to the present invention, a free cutting
alloy excellent in machinability can be realized without any degradation in useful
characteristics as an alloy such as hardness, corrosion resistivity, hot workability,
cold workability and specific magnetic characteristics.
[0010] Further, a (Ti,Zr) based compound formed in a free cutting alloy of the present invention
is dispersed in the alloy structure. Machinability of an alloy can be further increased
especially by dispersing the compound in an alloy structure. In order to increase
the effect, a particle size of the (Ti,Zr) based compound as observed in the structure
of a polished section of the alloy is preferably, for example, approximately in the
range of 0.1 to 30 µm on the average and further, an area ratio of the compound in
the structure is preferably in the range of 1 to 20 %, wherein the particle size is
defined by the maximum distance between two parallel lines circumscribing a particle
in observation when parallel lines are drawn intersecting on a region including the
particle in observation while changing a direction of the parallel lines.
[0011] The above described (Ti,Zr) based alloy can include at least a compound expressed
in a composition formula (Ti,Zr)
4(S,Se,Te)
2C
2 (hereinafter also referred to as carbo-sulfide/selenide), wherein one or more of
Ti and Zr may be included in the compound and one or more of S, Se and Te may be included
in the compound. By forming a compound in the form of the above described composition
formula, not only can machinability of an alloy be improved, but corrosion resistivity
is also improved.
[0012] It should be appreciated that identification of a (Ti,Zr) based compound in an alloy
can be performed by X-ray diffraction (for example, a diffractometer method), an electron
probe microanalysis method (EPMA) and the like technique. For example, the presence
or absence of the compound of (Ti,Zr)
4(S,Se,Te)
2C
2 can be confirmed according to whether or not a peak corresponding to the compound
appear in a diffraction chart measured by an X-ray diffractometer. Further, a region
in the alloy structure in which the compound is formed can also be specified by comparison
between two-dimensional mapping results on characteristic X-ray intensities of Ti,
Zr, S, Se or C obtained from a surface analysis by EPMA conducted on a section structure
of the alloy.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0013]
Fig. 1 is a graph showing an X-ray diffraction chart of an inventive steel specimen
No. 5 in experiment of Example 1 (Reference);
Fig. 2 is an optical microphotograph of the third selection inventive steel specimen
No. 2 in Example 3;
Fig. 3 is a graph showing EDX analytical results of a reference specimen No.2 in Example
2 (Reference);
Fig. 4 is optical microphotograph of reference steels specimen Nos. 2 and 13 in Example
2 (Reference);
Fig. 5 is a representation describing measuring points for a hardness test in Example
2 (Reference);
Fig. 6 is a graph showing an example of Schaeffler diagram;
Fig. 7 is graphs showing EDX analytical results of a third selection inventive steel
specimen No.2 in experiment of Example 3;
Fig. 8 is an optical microphotograph of the reference steel specimen No.5 in Example
1 (Reference);
Fig. 9 is a graph showing dependencies of solubility products on temperature of components
of TiO, TiN, Ti4C2S2, TiC, TiS and CrS in γ-Fe;
Preferred Embodiments of the Invention
[0014] The present invention, to be concrete, is applied on an alloy constituted as stainless
steel. In this case, in order to form a (Ti,Zr) based compound without any degradation
in characteristics as stainless steel, such an alloy preferably contains one or more
of Ti and Zr such that W
Ti + 0.52 W
Zr = 0.03 to 3.5 mass %, wherein W
Ti and W
Zr denote respective contents in mass % of Ti and Zr; and one or more of S and Se in
the respective ranges of 0.01 to 1.0 mass % for S and 0.01 to 0.8 mass % for Se.
[0015] The reason why the elements and contents thereof are selected as follows:
(1) The Ti and Zr content being defined such that WTi + 0.52 WZr = 0.03 to 3.5 mass %, wherein WTi and Wzr denote respective contents in mass % of Ti and Zr
[0016] Ti and Zr are indispensable elements for forming a (Ti,Zr) based compound playing
a central role in exerting the effect of improving machinability of a free cutting
alloy of the present invention. When a value of W
Ti + 0.52 W
Zr is lower than 0.03 mass %, the (Ti,Zr) based compound is insufficiently formed in
amount, thereby disabling the effect of improving machinability to be satisfactorily
exerted- On the other hand, when in excess of the value, machinability is reduced
on the contrary. For this reason, the value of W
Ti + 0.52 W
Zr is required to be suppressed to 3.5 mass % or lower. The above effect exerted when
Ti and Zr are added into an alloy is determined by the sum of the numbers of atoms
(or the sum of the numbers of values in mol), regardless of kinds of metals, Ti or
Zr. Since a ratio between atomic weights is almost 1 : 0.52, Ti of a smaller atomic
weight exerts a larger effect with a smaller mass. Thus, a value of W
Ti + 0.52 W
Zr is said to be compositional parameter reflects the sum of the numbers of atoms of
Zr and Ti included in an alloy.
(2) One or more of S and Se in the respective ranges of 0.01 to 1 mass % for S and
0.01 to 0.8 mass % for Se
[0017] S and Se are elements for useful in improving machinability. By adding S and Se into
an alloy, in an alloy structure, formed is a compound useful for improving machinability
(for example, a (Ti,Zr) based compound expressed in the form of a composition formula
(Ti,Zr)
4(S,Se)
2C
2). Therefore, contents of S and Se are specified 0.01 mass % as the lower limit. When
the contents are excessively large, there arises a chance to cause a problem of deteriorating
hot workability and therefore, there have to be the upper limits: The S content is
set to 1 mass % and the Se content is set to 0.8 mass % as the respective upper limits.
Further, S and Se are both desirably added into an alloy in a necessary and sufficient
amount in order to form a compound improving machinability of the alloy, such as the
above described (Ti,Zr) based compound. An excessive addition of S results in deterioration
of the out-gas resistivity.
[0018] Free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as stainless steel is austenite
containing stainless steel (hereinafter referred to a third selection invention),
wherein the free cutting alloy contains: 2 to 50 mass % Ni; 12 to 50 mass % Cr; 5
to 85.95 mass % Fe; and 0.01 to 0.4 mass % C.
[0019] Herein, austenite containing stainless steel means stainless steel containing not
only Fe as a main component, but an austenitic phase in the structure. While there
are below exemplified corresponding kinds of steel exhibited in JIS G 4304, neither
of elements Ti, Zr, S and Se as essential features of the present invention is naturally
expressed in compositions described in the standard. In this case, part of Fe content
of each of the above described kinds of stainless steel is replaced with the above
described elements in the respective above described compositional ranges and thereby
martensite containing stainless steel of the present invention is obtained. Therefore,
while in description of the present specification, the same JIS Nos. are used, those
actually means alloys specific to the present invention, which alloys have compositions
defined in JIS standards as a base only.
(1) Austenitic stainless steel is stainless steel showing an austenitic structure
even in room temperature and can be exemplified as follows: SUS 201, SUS 202, SUS
301,SUS 301J, SUS 302, SUS 302B, SUS 304, SUS 304N1, SUS 304N2, SUS 305, SUS 309S,
SUS 310S, SUS 316, SUS 316N, SUD 316J1, SUS 317, SUS 317J1, SUS 321, SUS 347, SUS
XM15J1, SUS 836L, SUS 890L and so on.
(2) Austenitic-ferritic stainless steel is stainless steel showing a dual phase structure
of austenite and ferrite and can be exemplified SUS 329J4L and so on.
(3) Precipitation hardening stainless steel is a stainless steel obtained by adding
elements such as aluminum and copper, and precipitating a compound with the elements
as main components by a heat treatment to harden and can be exemplified SUS 630, SUS
631 and so on. It should be appreciated that a concept of "stainless steel" includes
heat resisting steel exemplified below as well:
(4) Austenitic heat resisting steel
Compositions are stipulated in JIS G 4311 and G 4312, for example, and can be exemplified
as follows: SUS 31, SUH 35, SUH 36, SUH 37, SUH 38, SUB 309, SUH 310, SUH 330, SUH
660, SUH 661 and so on.
[0020] Description will be given of the reason why the constituting elements and preferable
ranges in content thereof are defined in the third selection invention of the present
invention constituted as austenite containing stainless:
(3) 2 to 50 mass % Ni
[0021] Ni is necessary to be added to stainless steel in a content of at least 2 mass %
in order to stabilize an austenitic phase in the stainless steel. Moreover, while
Ni has many chances to be added into the matrix since Ni is useful for improving corrosion
resistivity in an environment of a reducing acid, it is preferable to add at 2 mass
% or higher in content from the viewpoint of improvement on corrosion resistivity.
Moreover, when non-magnetism is desired, a necessary amount of Ni is required to be
added so as to stabilize an austenitic phase more and thereby obtain an alloy as austenite
containing stainless steel, considering connection with contents of other elements
such as Cr and Mo. In this case, a Schoeffler diagram shown in Fig. 6 can be utilized
for determination of the Ni content. An austenite forming element and a ferrite forming
element are converted to equivalents of Ni and Cr amounts and a relationship between
the equivalents and the structure is shown in Fig. 6 (see Revised 5
th version Kinzoku Binran (Metal Hand Book) published by Maruzen in 1990, p. 578). However,
it is required to obtain a necessary amount of Ni in consideration of exclusion of
an amount in Ti and/or Zr compound from constituting elements of the matrix. Since
not only does excessive addition of Ni result in cost-up, but specific characteristics
as stainless steel are also degraded, a Ni content is limited to 50 mass % or lower.
(4) 12 to 50 mass % Cr
[0022] Cr is an indispensable element for ensuring corrosion resistivity of stainless steel.
Hence, Cr is added in a content equal to 12 mass % or higher. When a Cr content is
lower than 12 mass %, corrosion resistivity as stainless steel cannot be ensured due
to intergranular corrosion caused by increased sensitivity at grain boundaries. On
the other hand, when added in excess, there arises a risk that not only is hot workability
degraded, but toughness is also reduced due to formation of a compound such as CrS.
[0023] Furthermore, a problem occurs since high temperature embrittlement becomes conspicuous,
therefore a Cr content is limited to 50 mass % or lower. For this reason, a Cr content
is preferably set in the range of 12 to 50 mass % and performances specific to stainless
steel are, in a case, degraded outside the range in content of Cr. Desirably, a Cr
content is set in the range of 15 to 30 mass % and more desirably in the range of
17 to 25 mass %.
(5) 5 to 85.95 mass % Fe
[0024] Fe is an indispensable component for constituting stainless steel. Therefore, a Fe
content is at 5 mass % or higher. When an Fe content is lower than 5 mass %, the Fe
content is not preferable since no strength specific to stainless steel can be obtained.
That an Fe content exceeds 85.95 mass % is impossible in connection with required
contents of other components. Consequently, an Fe content is in the range of 5 to
85.95 mass %. An Fe content is desirably set in the range of 15 to 75 mass % and more
desirably in the range of 40 to 65 mass %.
(6) 0.01 to 0.4 mass % C
[0025] C is an indispensable component for improvement on machinability and added in a content
of 0.01 mass % or higher. With C being included in the matrix, a (Ti,Zr) based compound
is formed, and formation of the compound is considered to improves machinability of
stainless steel. When a C content is lower than 0.01 mass %, formation of the (Ti,Zr)
based compound is insufficient and the effect of improving machinability is not sufficiently
attainable. On the other hand, when the content exceeds 0.4 mass %, a carbide not
useful for improvement on machinability is excessively formed and therefore, machinability
is deteriorated on the contrary. It is considered that residual C not included, as
a constituting element, in the(Ti,Zr) based compound contributing to improvement on
machinability is dissolved in the matrix phase of stainless steel in a solid state
and the residual C in solid solution gives birth to an effect of increasing a hardness
of the stainless steel as well. Therefore, a C content is preferably set in a proper
manner taking into consideration not only that C is added such that a machinability
improvement effect is exerted in best conditions according to an amount of constituting
elements of a compound improving machinability, such as the (Ti,Zr) based compound,
but also the effect of improving hardness exerted by the residual C dissolved in a
solid solution state in the matrix phase. In consideration of the above described
circumferences, a C content is desirably in the range of 0.03 to 0.3 mass % and more
desirably in the range of 0.05 to 0.25 mass %.
[0026] In a free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as austenite containing
stainless steel, a composition may have the following components and contents thereof
in order to achieve better characteristics. That is, the composition can be 4 mass
% or lower, including zero Si; 4 mass % or lower, including zero Mn; 4 mass % or lower,
including zero Cu; and 4 mass % or lower, including zero Co. Description will be given
of the reason why the composition has the elements and contents thereof as follows:
(7) 4 mass % or lower, including zero Si
[0027] Si can be added as a deoxidizing agent for steel. However, when a content of Si is
excessive high, not only is a hardness after solid solution heat treatment disadvantageously
high, which in turn leads to poor cold workability, but an increased amount of a δ-ferrite
phase is formed, thereby deteriorating hot workability of the steel. Hence, the upper
limit of Si in content is set to 4 mass %. Especially, when cold workability and hot
workability are both regarded as important characteristics, a Si content is desirably
set to 1 mass % or lower and more desirably to 0.5 mass % or lower, including zero.
(8) 4 mass % or lower, including zero Mn
[0028] Mn not only acts as a deoxidizing agent of the steel, but also exerts an effect to
suppress formation of a δ-ferrite phase. Furthermore, Mn has an effect to stabilize
an austenitic phase. Since Mn forms a compound useful for increase in machinability
in co-esistence with S and Se, Mn may added to the matrix when machinability is regarded
as an important characteristic. When an effect of improving machinability is expected
to be conspicuous, a Mn content is preferably set to 0.6 mass % or higher. When Mn
is added, MnS is formed with ease. However, since MnS not only degrades corrosion
resistivity to a great extent, but also reduces cold workability, formation of MnS
is unwelcome. Therefore, the Mn content is set to 4 mass % or lower, including zero.
Especially, when corrosion resistivity and cold workability are both regarded as important
characteristics, the Mn content is desirably set to 1 mass % or lower, including zero
and more desirably to 0.5 mass % or lower, including zero.
(9) 4 mass % or lower, including zero Cu
[0029] Cu is not only useful for increase in corrosion resistivity, particularly for improving
corrosion resistivity in an environment of a reducing acid, but also reduces work
hardenability and improves moldability. Moreover, since an antibacterial property
can be improved by a heat treatment or the like processing, Cu may added if necessary.
However, when Cu is excessively added, hot workability is degraded and therefore,
a Cu content is preferably set to 4 mass % or lower, including zero. Especially, when
hot workability is regarded as an important characteristic, the Cu content is more
desirably set to 1 mass % or lower, including zero.
(10) 4 mass % or lower, including zero Co
[0030] Co is an element not only useful for improving corrosion resistivity, particularly
in an environment of a reducing acid, but to exert an effect of ensuring non-magnetism
and therefore, may added to the matrix if necessary. It is preferable to add in content
of 1 mass % or higher in order to obtain more of conspicuousness of the effect. However,
when Co is added in excess, not only is hot workability reduced but cost-up occurs
on raw material. Hence, a Co content is preferably set to 4 mass % or lower, including
zero. Especially, when hot workability or cost is taken seriously, the Co content
is more desirably suppressed to 0.3 mass % or lower, including zero.
[0031] In the third selection invention constituted as austenite containing stainless steel,
the stainless steel can contain one or more of Mo and W in the respective ranges of
0.1 to 10 mass % for Mo and 0.1 to 10 mass % for W. Addition of Mo and W can improve
corrosion resistivity due to strengthened passivation and furthermore attain improved
hardness due to second hardening. It is preferable to add Mo and W in each content
of 0.1 mass %, or higher in order to make the effect exerted clearly. On the other
hand, when in excess, hot workability is reduced and therefore, the content of Mo
and W combined is preferably set to 10 mass % as the upper limit.
[0032] In the austenite containing stainless steel described above, contents of other elements
are as follows: the stainless steels can contain: 0.05 mass % or lower P; and 0.03
mass % O; and 0.05 mass % or lower N. Moreover, the stainless steels can further contain
one or more of Te, Bi and Pb in the respective ranges of 0.005 to 0.1 mass % for Te;
0.01 to 0.2 mass % for Bi; and 0.01 to 0.3 mass % for Pb. Description will be given
of the reason why the elements and contents thereof are defined as follows:
(11) 0.05 mass % or lower, including zero P
[0033] P is segregated at grain boundaries and not only increases intergranular corrosion
sensibility but also sometimes reduces toughness. Therefore, a P content is preferably
set as low as possible and to 0.05 mass % or lower, including zero. Although the P
content is more desirably set to 0.03 mass % or lower, including zero, reduction in
content more than necessary has a chance to be reflected on increased production cost.
(12) 0.03 mass % or lower, including zero O
[0034] O combines with Ti or Zr both of which are constituting elements of a compound useful
for improving machinability and forms oxides not useful for improving machinability.
Therefore, an O content should be suppressed as low as possible and is set to 0.03
mass % as the upper limit. The O content is desirably set to 0.01 mass % or lower
if allowable in consideration of increase in production cost.
(13) 0.05 mass % or lower, including zero N
[0035] N combines with Ti or Zr both of which are constituting elements of a compound useful
for improving machinability and forms nitrides not useful for improving machinability.
Therefore, a N content should be suppressed as low as possible and is set to 0.05
mass % as the upper limit. The N content is desirably set to 0.03 mass % or lower,
including zero and more desirably to 0.01 mass %, if allowable in consideration of
increase in production cost.
(14) One or more of Te, Bi and Pb in the respective ranges of 0.005 to 0.1 mass %
for Te; 0.01 to 0.2 mass % for Bi; and 0.01 to 0.3 mass % for Pb
[0036] Since Te, Bi and Pb can further improve machinability, the elements may add if necessary.
The lower limits thereof at which the respective effects are exerted to clearness
are as follows: 0.005 mass % Te; 0.01 mass % Bi and 0.01 mass % Pb, respectively.
On the other hand, since excessive addition reduces hot workability, the upper limits
are set as follows: 0.1 mass % Te; 0.2 mass % Bi; and 0.3 mass % Pb.
[0037] Furthermore, the free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as stainless
steel, can contain one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca, Mg, B and
REM (one or more of metal elements classified as Group 3A in the periodic table of
elements) in the range of 0.0005 to 0.01 mass % for one element or as a total content
in a case of two or more elements. The elements are useful for improving hot workability
of steel. The effect of improving hot workability obtainable by addition of the elements
is more conspicuously exerted in the range of 0.0005 mass % or higher for one element
or as a total content of more than one elements combined. On the other hand, when
the elements are added in excess, the effect is saturated and hot workability is then
reduced on the contrary. Therefore, the content of a single element or total content
of the elements combined is set to 0.01 mass % as the upper limit. As for REM, since
low radioactivity elements are easy to be handled when being mainly used, from this
viewpoint, it is useful to use one or more selected from the group consisting of Sc,
Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu. It is desirable to use
light rare earth elements, especially La or Ce from the viewpoint of conspicuous exertion
of the effect and price. However, there arises no trouble with mixing-in of a trace
of radioactive rare earth elements such as Th and U inevitably remaining, without
being excluded, in a process to separate rare earth elements. Further, from the viewpoint
of reduction in raw material cost, there can be used not-separated rare earth elements
such as mish metal and didymium.
[0038] A free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as stainless steel can
contain one or more selected from the group consisting of Nb, V, Ta and Hf in each
range of 0.01 to 0.5 mass %. Since Nb, V, Ta and Hf has an effect of forming carbo-nitrides
to miniaturize crystalline particles of steel and increase toughness. Hence, the elements
can add in each content up to 0.5 mass % and desirably contain 0.01 mass % or higher
in the range.
[0039] A free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as the above described
stainless steel can contain the Wso value of which is less than 0.035 mass % when
the following test is performed: an alloy test piece of said free cutting alloy is
prepared so as to have the shape of rectangular prism in size of 15 mm in length,
25 mm in width and 3 mm in thickness with the entire surface being polished with No.
400 emery paper; a silver foil in size of 10 mm in length, 5 mm in width and 0.1 mm
in thickness with a purity of 99.9 % or higher as a S getter; 0.5 cm
3 of pure water are sealed in a vessel of an inner volume of 250 cm
3 together with said test piece; the temperature in said vessel is raised to 85°C and
said temperature is then kept there for 20 hr; and thereafter, the S content in mass
% in said silver foil piece is analyzed, then S content obtained is defined as said
Wso.
[0040] A (Ti, Zr) based compound being a feature of the present invention is formed and
in the course of the formation, added S is included in the stainless steel as a constituting
element of the (Ti, Zr) based compound which is more stable chemically than MnS or
the like. And therefore, a S amount released into the air from the stainless steel
decreases. Consequently, an out-gas resistivity of the stainless steel can also be
improved by formation of the(Ti, Zr) based compound.
[0041] In this case, when the out-gas resistivity test is performed, a S component released
from the test piece as a sulfur containing gas is forced to be absorbed in the silver
foil as a getter and a sulfur content Wso in the silver foil is measured to quantitatively
determine the out-gas resistivity of a material. A S content absorbed in the silver
foil is defined using the W
SO value and set to 0.035 mass % or lower in W
SO. Stainless steel of the present invention controlled so as to be 0.035 mass % or
lower in Wso is hard to cause sulfur contamination in the peripheral parts when exposed
to the air since a S component released from the stainless steel into the air is very
small and thereby the stainless steel can be preferably used as parts of industrial
equipment requiring the out-gas resistivity.
[0042] While a factor determining out-gas resistivity of a material mainly is a composition
of the material, it is desirable to fix S as carbo-sulfides of Ti and Zr for improvement
on out-gas resistivity of the material. For the purpose, a S content is desirably
determined such that a value of W
S/(W
Ti + 0.52W
Zr) is 0.45 or less, or alternatively a value of W
S/W
C is 0.4 or less and W
S/(W
Ti+ 0.52W
Zr) is 0.45 or less, wherein W
S and W
C denote a S content and a C content, respectively. With such a range of components
adopted, a S content which is chemically in unstable condition can be limited and
thereby, the out-gas resistivity of the matrix metal phase of stainless steel can
be improved.
Examples
[0043] The following experiments were performed in order to confirm the effects of the present
invention. It should be appreciated that in the following description, test alloy
relating to the present invention is referred to as inventive steel or inventive alloy,
or as a selection inventive steel or a selection inventive alloy.
Example 1 Ferrite containing stainless steel (Reference only)
[0044] The effects of a free cutting alloy constituted as ferrite containing stainless steel
(a reference steel) were confirmed by the following experiment. First, 50 kg steel
blocks with respective compositions in mass % shown in Table 1 were molten in a high
frequency induction furnace and ingots prepared from the molten blocks were heated
at a temperature in the range of from 1050 to 1100°C and the ingots were forged in
a hot state into rods with a circular section of 20 mm diameter and the rods were
further heated at 800°C for 1 hr, followed by air cooling (annealing) as a source
for test pieces.
Table 1
[0045] While main inclusions of reference steel was (Ti,Zr)
4(S,Se)
2C
2, other inclusions such as (Ti,Zr)S and (Ti,Zr)S
3 are locally recognized in the matrix. Further, in a specimen No. 7 high in Mn content,
(Mn, Cr)S is recognized, though in a trace amount. An identification method for inclusions
was performed in the following way: A test piece in a proper amount was sampled from
each of the rods. A metal matrix portion of the test piece was dissolved by electrolysis
using a methanol solution including tetramethylammonium chloride and acetylaceton
at 10 % as a electrolytic solution. The electrolytic solution after the electrolysis
was subjected to filtration and compounds not dissolved in steel were extracted from
the filtrate. The extract was dried and subjected to chemical analysis by an X-ray
diffraction method with a diffractometer. A compound was identified based on peaks
of a diffraction chart. A composition of a compound particle in the steel structure
was separately analyzed by EPMA and a compound with a composition corresponding to
a compound observed by X-ray diffraction was confirmed based on formation from two
dimensional mapping results. Fig. 1 shows an X-ray diffraction chart of a steel No.
5 by a diffractometer and Fig. 8 is an optical microphotograph of a steel specimen
No. 5. Further, specimens Nos. 1 to 14 in Table 1 are kinds of steel corresponding
to reference steel and specimens Nos. 15 to 28 are kinds of steel as comparative examples.
[0046] The following experiments were performed on the above described test pieces:
1) Hot workability test
[0047] Evaluation of hot workability was effected based on visual observation of whether
or not defects such as cracks occur in hot forging. [○] indicates that substantially
no defect occurred in hot forging, [×] indicates that large scale cracks were recognized
in hot forging and Δ indicates that small cracks occurred in hot forging.
2) Evaluation of machinability
[0048] Evaluation of machinability was collectively effected based on cutting resistance
in machining, finished surface roughness and chip shapes. A cutting tool made of cermet
was used to perform machining under a dry condition at a circumferential speed of
150 m/min, a depth of cutting per revolution of 0.1 mm and a feed rate per revolution
of 0.05 mm. A cutting resistance in N as a unit was determined by measuring a cutting
force generating in the machining. The finished surface roughness was measured by
a method stipulated in JIS B 0601 and a value thereof was an arithmetic average roughness
(in µm Ra) on a test piece surface after the machining. Moreover, chip shapes were
visually observed and when friability was good, the result is indicated by [G] and
when friability is bad and all chips are not separated but partly connected, the result
is indicated by [B] and when evaluation of chip shapes is intermidiate of [G] and
[B], the result is indicated by [I].
3)
4)Evaluation of out-gas resistivity
[0049] Evaluation of out-gas resistivity was performed by determining an amount of released
S. To be concrete, test pieces in use each had the shape of a rectangular prism of
15 mm in length, 25 mm in width and 3 mm in thickness and the entire surface of each
were polished with No. 400 emery paper. A test piece was placed in a sealed vessel
having an inner volume of 250 cm
3 together with a silver foil having a size of 10 mm in length, 5 mm in width and 0.1
mm in thickness and 0.5 cm
3 of pure water, and a temperature in the vessel was maintained at 85°C for 20 hr.
A S content W
SO in the silver foil after the process for the test was measured by a combustion type
infrared absorbing analysis method.
4) Cold workability test
[0050] Evaluation of cold workability was performed by measuring a threshold compressive
stain in a compression test on specimens Nos. 1 to 5 and 13. Test pieces for compression
each had the shape of a cylinder of 15 mm in diameter and 22.5 mm in height and each
piece was compressed by a 600 t oil hydraulic press to obtain a threshold compressive
strain, wherein the threshold compressive strain is defined as ln (H0/H) or a natural
logarithm of H0/H, H0 being an initial height of the test piece and H being a threshold
height which is a maximum height at which no cracking has occurred. Reference alloys
of the specimens Nos. 1 to 5 were confirmed to have high threshold compressive ratios
almost equal to comparative steel specimen No. 15 and higher than comparative steel
specimen No. 16 by about 20 %, and have a good cold workability as well.
5) Evaluation of corrosion resistivity
[0051] Evaluation of corrosion resistivity was performed by a salt spray test. Test pieces
each were prepared so to have the shape of a cylinder of 10 mm in diameter and 50
mm in height. The entire surface of each test piece was polished with No. 400 emery
paper and cleaned. A test piece was exposed to a fog atmosphere of 5 mass % NaCl aqueous
solution at 35°C for 96 hr. Final evaluation was visually performed with the naked
eye. As a result, the inventive steel of the present invention was confirmed to maintain
good corrosion resistivity. The results are shown in Table 2.
Table 2
[0052] It is found from Table 2 that a reference steel is comparable with conventional ferrite
containing stainless steel in hot workability, cold workability and corrosion resistivity
and moreover, is better in machinability than the conventional ferrite containing
stainless steel. Further, it is found from Table 2 when comparing with comparative
steel specimens Nos. 16 and 18 that the reference steel is smaller in Wso and better
in out-gas resistivity. The reason why kinds of steel of comparative alloy specimens
Nos. 16 and 18 each have a high Wso is considered that since the steel of the kinds
has neither Ti nor Zr, carbo-sulfide is hard to be formed, whereby a S amount in the
matrix is excessively high. In comparative alloy specimen No. 18, hot workability
is poor and therefore, evaluation of machinability was not performed.
Example 2 Martensite containing stainless steel (Reference only)
[0053] The following experiment was performed on martensite containing stainless steel.
First, 50 kg steel blocks of compositions in mass % shown in Table 3 were molten in
a high frequency induction furnace to form respective ingots. The ingots were heated
at temperature in the range of from 1050 to 1100°C to be forged in a hot state and
be formed into rods each with a circular section, of a diameter of 20 mm. The rods
were further heated at 750°C for 1 hr, followed by air cooling to be applied to the
test.
Table 3
[0054] In Table 3, specimens Nos. 1 to 19 are reference steels constituted as martensite
containing stainless steel. Further, in comparative examples, specimens correspond
to stainless steel: a specimen No. 20 corresponds to SUS 410, a specimen No. 21 to
SUS 416, a specimen No. 22 to SUS 420F and a specimen No. 23 to SUS 440F. Further,
specimens Nos. 24 to 26 are of stainless steel, i.e. reference specimens.
[0055] While main inclusions of the inventive steel of the present invention was of (Ti,Zr)
4(S,Se)
2C
2, other inclusions such as (Ti,Zr)S and (Ti,Zr)S
3 are locally recognized in the matrix. Further, in a specimen No. 9 high in a Mn content
and the like, (Mn,Cr)S was recognized, though in a small amount. An identification
of inclusions was performed in the following way: A test piece in a proper amount
was sampled from each of the rods. A metal matrix portion of the test piece was dissolved
by electrolysis using a methanol solution including tetramethylammonium chloride and
acetylaceton at 10 % as a electrolytic solution. The electrolytic solution after the
electrolysis was subjected to filtration and compounds not dissolved in steel were
extracted from the filtrate. The extract was dried and subjected to chemical analysis
by EDX (Energy Dispersive X-ray spectrometer). A compound was identified based on
peaks of a diffraction chart. A composition of a compound particle in the steel structure
was separately analyzed by EDX and a compound with a composition corresponding to
a compound observed by EDX was confirmed based on formation from two dimensional mapping
results. Fig. 3 shows EDX analytical results of arbitrary inclusions in a reference
steel specimen No.2 and from the results, formation of (Ti,Zr) based compound can
be recognized. Further, Fig. 4 shows optical microphotograph of reference steel specimens
Nos. 2 and 13.
[0056] The following experiment was performed on the above described test pieces.
1) Hot workability test
[0057] Evaluation of hot workability was effected based on visual observation of whether
or not defects such as cracks occur in hot forging. While workability in hot forging
was at levels at which processing can be performed with no problem, as not only inclusions
but an amount of alloy elements increase, deterioration in the workability was a tendency
observed in the test. It was found that kinds of steel of the present invention in
which one or more of Ca, B, Mg and REM was included had good hot workability when
comparing with a kind of steel in which none of the elements was included.
2) Evaluation of machinability
[0058] Evaluation of machinability was collectively effected based on tool ware loss in
machining, finished surface roughness and ship shapes. A cutting tool made of cermet
was used to perform machining under a wet condition by water-soluble cutting oil at
a circumferential speed of 120 m/min, a depth of cutting per revolution of 0.1 mm
and a feed rate per revolution of 0.05 mm. The tool ware loss was measured at a flank
of the cutting tool after 60 min machining with µm as a unit of the tool wear loss.
The finished surface roughness and chip shapes were evaluated by a method similar
to that in Example 1 (Reference).
[0059] The following evaluations were performed using material subjected to treatments in
which the material is kept at 980 to 1050°C for 30 min, thereafter subjected to a
quenching heat treatment and still further subjected to a tempering treatment of holding
at 180°C for 1 hr, followed by air cooling.
3) Hardness test
[0060] Measurement of hardness on a test piece was performed on a C scale Rockwell hardness
by the Rockwell hardness test stipulated in JIS Z 2245. The Rockwell hardness was
obtained as the average of measurements at arbitrary 5 measuring points S on a circle
drawn on a cross section of a rod test piece having a circular section, the circle
drawn on the cross section being a circle satisfying a relation of PS = 0.25 PG, wherein
G denotes a point almost coinciding with a center of the circular section, P denotes
an arbitrary point on the outer periphery of the test piece and a point S is on a
line segment PG
4) Evaluation of out-gas resistivity
[0061] Evaluation of out-gas resistivity was performed similar to in Example 1 (Reference).
5) Evaluation of corrosion resistivity
[0062] Evaluation of corrosion resistivity was performed by a method similar to in Example
1 (Reference). Test pieces each were prepared so to have the shape of a cylinder of
15 mm in diameter and 50 mm in height. The entire surface of each test piece was polished.
Each test piece was polished and thereafter, a test piece was held in a thermohygrostat
at a temperature of 60°C and a relative humidity of 90 % RH for 168 hr. An evaluation
method was such that when no rust was confirmed, the test piece was evaluated [A],
when dot-like stains were recognized at several points on a test piece, the test piece
was evaluated [B], when red rust was recognized in an area of an area ratio of 5 %
or less, the test piece was evaluated [C] and when red rust was recognized in an area
wider than an area ratio of 5 %, the test piece was evaluated [D]. The results are
shown in Table 4.
Table 4
[0063] It is found from Table 4 that while in stainless steel of comparative specimens Nos.
20 to 23, hardness is sufficiently ensured, machinability is poor. It is further found
that specimens Nos. 21 to 23 are inferior in corrosion resistivity and out-gas resistivity.
When a reference steel is compared with a steel in accordance with Reference Example
2, it is found that the reference steel has improved machinability, while the steel
in accordance with Reference Example 2 has improved hardness, improved corrosion resistivity
and improved out-gas resistivity. The reason why the steel in accordance with Reference
Example 2 was improved in hardness as compared with the inventive steel is considered
that a C content satisfies the formulae A and B and thereby, a C content constituting
a (Ti,Zr) based compound and a C content as additive establishes an adjusted balance
and thereby, a C component is sufficiently dispersed in a Fe based matrix phase. Further,
the reason why out-gas resistivity was improved is considered that S is added excessively
relative to an amount of a (Ti,Zr) based compound that can be formed.
Example 3 Austenite containing stainless steel
[0064] An experiment was performed on a free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted
as austenite containing stainless steel (a third selection inventive steel). 50 kg
blocks of compositions in mass % shown in Table 5 were molten in a high frequency
induction furnace to form ingots. The ingots were heated at a temperature in the range
from 1050 to 1100°C and hot forging was applied on the ingot at the same temperature
to be formed into rods each having a circular section, of a diameter of 20 mm. Specimens
Nos. 1 to 18 and 22 to 26 are steel corresponding to third selection inventive steels
and specimens Nos. 19 to 21 and 27 to 29 are of comparative steels.
[0065] The specimen No. 19 corresponds to SUS 304, the specimen No. 20 to SUS 303, the specimen
No. 27 to SUS 329J4L. Among them, the specimens Nos. 1 to 21 are kinds of steel for
use in application of a non-magnetism and the specimens Nos. 22 to 29 are kinds of
steel for use in application other than non-magnetism. Among them, the specimens Nos.
1 to 24 and 27 were heated at 1050°C for 1 hr and thereafter water-cooled, while the
other kinds of steel were heated at 750°C for 1 hr and thereafter water-cooled. Thereafter,
both group of kinds of steel were further heated at 650°C for 2 hr and thereafter
water-cooled, followed by tests. All the test pieces of inventive steels obtained
each had a main phase in which at least an austenitic phase was formed. Main phases
of third selection inventive steels are shown in Table 5, wherein A denotes an austenitic
phase, B a ferritic phase and C a martensitic phase.
Table 5
[0066] While main inclusions of the inventive steel of the present invention was of (Ti,Zr)
4(S,Se)
2C
2, other inclusions such as (Ti,Zr)S and (Ti,Zr)S
3 are locally recognized. Further, in specimens Nos. 9, 10 and 13 high in a Mn content
and the like, (Mn,Cr)S was recognized, though in a small amount. Identification of
inclusions was performed similar to in Reference Example 2. Fig. 7 shows EDX analytical
results of arbitrary inclusions in the third selection inventive steel specimen No.2
and from the results, formation of (Ti,Zr) based compound can be recognized. Further,
Fig. 2 shows an optical microphotograph of the third selection inventive steels specimen
No. 2.
[0067] The following experiments were performed on the above described test pieces for 1)
hot workability test, 2) evaluation of machinability, 3) evaluation of out-gas resistivity,
4) cold workability test and 5) evaluation of corrosion resistivity by methods similar
to those in Reference Example 1. The experiment on the evaluation of machinability
adopted a circumferential speed of a cutting tool of cermet at 120 m/min. The results
obtained are shown in Table 6.
Table 6