FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to biodegradable dual density cigarette.
[0002] More specifically the subject invention relates to biodegradable dual density cigarette
comprising of two portions, a tobacco rod and butt portion joined to each other longitudinally.
PRIOR ART
[0003] The cigarettes presently available in the national and International market can be
categorized in two classes namely, plain (non-filter) and filter cigarettes. Cigarettes
are made in various sizes in diameter and lengths. The cost of Plain cigarettes is
substantially lower. These "plain cigarettes" attract smokers of two types - "Bidi
smokers wanting to upgrade themselves "and" filter cigarette smoker opting for low
cost cigarettes".
[0004] The non-filter cigarettes have tobacco with normal density throughout the length
of the cigarette. Often the loose tobacco particles enter the mouth of the smoker
due to the absence of a filter. The Non-filter cigarette often turns soggy at the
smoking end due to constant contact with the smoker's mouth. Besides, due to the relatively
loose packing density of the tobacco and loss of tobacco particles from the nonsmoking
end, the cigarette loses its stiffness.
[0005] Filter cigarettes contain tobacco of normal density along with synthetic filters.
The filter plug in a filter cigarette comprises of fibrous material attached to a
normal density tobacco rod. The fibrous material can be cellulose, acetate tow, polypropylene
tow, or any of the other known kind of synthetic fibrous material. These filter cigarettes
are non-biodegradable, and require special cigarette making equipment and additionally
these cigarettes are more expensive than non-filter cigarette.
[0006] U.S. Patent Application No. 09/988,828 teaches about a filter cigarette with tobacco
filter in which the tobacco strand enclosed by a cigarette paper. The tobacco used
is manufactured without using medium cut roll stem and without reconstituted tobacco
with a width cut of 0.3 to 0.6 mm and the filter has a tobacco packing density of
350 to 400 g/cm
3.
[0007] EP 1250 854 A1 describes a poison-reduced cigarette includes adding hydrate of double
salt of ferroso-ferric chloride into tobacco and cigarette filter to react with nicotine
to form salt which will not be absorbed by the mucous membranes in the smoker's respiratory
system for minimizing nicotine poison and for enhancing the smoker's health.
[0008] EP 1032282 describes a filter for tobacco products, in particular cigarettes, is
made of a cellulose nonwoven fabric produced by an air-laid process and spirally rolled.
[0009] EP 1032283 describes a filter cigarette comprising a biodegradable filter and a tobacco
strand surrounded by cigarette paper, a non-woven air-laid cellulose filter with a
normal retention capacity and a filter ventilation area extending in a peripheral
direction. The filter cigarette has the combination of features. The filter has a
condensate retention capacity of 40-60%; the non-woven cellulose is non-crimped, the
nicotine/tobacco strand condensate yield ratio lies between 0,6 and 0,9 (nicotine
*10/condensate), the apparent density of the tobacco mixture of the tobacco strand
ranges from 200 to 250mg/ml, the tobacco strand drag is between 45 and 65 mmw WS when
measured in an enclosed form, air permeability of the cigarette paper is 20-50 CORESTA
units and the filter ventilation degree is 15-50%.
[0010] WO 01/58290 A1 discloses a cigarette filter for easily removing harmful materials
like nicotine an tar from cigarette smoke. During inhalation, the filter can filter
harmful ingredients such as nicotine and tar included in cigarette smoke, through
a front filter, a mugwort-impregnated filtering-net, a diffusing body, a pine resin-impregnated
filtering-net and then a back filter. Additionally, the filter which incorporates
the mugwort and the pine resin therein thus is helpful in preserving the health of
the smoker, as well as allowing the smoker to feel normal during inhalation, which
results from the aromatic properties of the mugwort and the pine resin impregnated
into filtering-nets present within the filter.
[0011] WO 00/72706 discloses a filter cigarette with a tobacco filter.
[0012] The filters of cigarettes designed to filter harmful materials, such as nicotine
and tar, are provided at one end of the cigarette. Such filters are typically classified
into several types as follows: That is, the conventional fitters of the cigarettes
are classified according to their structure into a single filter consisting of one
integrated filter, a double filter formed by a linear arrangement of two filter segments,
and a multiples filter formed by the linear arrangement of a plurality of different
kinds of filter segments. The filters are also classified according to the material
of the filters into a fiber filter, a chemical granule-laden filter, and a carbon
granule-laden filter. In the prior art, fiber filters allow hazardous materials included
in the cigarette smoke to simply pass through their fibrous matrix, and thus a large
effect cannot be expected. However, fiber filters, particularly those laden with carbon
or chemical granules for removing nicotine and tar, have been most preferably and
widely used as filters for cigarettes.
[0013] Conventionally a cigarrette rod making machine employs a distributor which delivers
fragmentized particles of tobacco leaves, fragmentized sheets of reconstituted tobacco
and/or fragments of artificial tobacco to a stream building zone wherein the particles
from a continuous stream. Such stream contains surplus of fibrous material and is
converted into a continuous rod during travel with a conveyor past a trimming or equalizing
device which removes the surplus. The resulting rod (also called filler) is thereupon
condensed and draped into a web of cigarette paper or other suitable wrapping material
to form with the weeb a cigarette rod which is subdivided (e.g., by a conventional
cutoff) into sections of unit length or multiple unit length. The thus obtained cigarettes
are delivered to storage, toa packing machine or to a filter tipping machine. Certain
types of filter rod sections are or can be produced in a similar manner except that
the fibrous material which forms the stream is a substance which intercepts certain
presumably harmful ingredients of tobacco smoke when it constitutes the rod-shaped
component of the filter mouthpiece in filter cigarette.
[0014] The object of the present invention is to provide the smoker a filter cigarette having
a filter portion which is biodegradable that substantially reduces the tar and nicotine
elements and having higher chloride contents.
[0015] The object of the present invention is to provide the smoker a filter cigarette which
is at the same time inexpensive and environment friendly.
[0016] Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a naturally biodegradable
cigarette having a smoke delivery profile comparable to the synthetic filter cigarette.
[0017] Further object of the present invention is to give satisfaction comparable to that
of the conventional filter cigarette without actually having synthetic filter in the
cigarette.
[0018] The present invention provides a biodegradable, environmental friendly, cost effective
filter cigarette which eliminates health hazards.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0019] Accordingly the present invention relates to a biodegradable dual-density cigarette
comprising of a rod of tobacco of predetermined length wrapped in cigarette paper
wherein the tobacco content are packed at high density at the smoking end of a predetermined
length and normal density for the remaining length up to the opposite end.
[0020] The tobacco content at the said high density end primarily includes mixtures of cut
and rolled stem (CRS), but can also include mixtures of graded tobacco, reconstituted
tobacco, dust with binders or natural materials.
[0021] The normal density of such rod is in the range of 225 mg/cc to 280 mg/cc while the
high density of such rod is at least 280 mg/cc.
[0022] The length ratio of normal and high density of said tobacco rod is 5:1 and is configured
so as to maintain the desired smoke delivery profile. The high-density end of the
said cigarette is wrapped with porus paper of a different colour for the identification
of the smoking high density end of the cigarette by the user.
[0023] Accordingly the present invention relates to a biodegradable dual density cigarette
comprising a filler or tobacco rod and butt portion joined to each other longitudinally
in a ratio of 5:1 wherein the tobacco rod is a blend of tobacco wrapped in a cigarette
paper at a pressure drop of 22 to 50 mm of water column, the butt portion comprising
atleast cut-roll stem particles of expanded fibres of density of at least 0.28g/cc
wrapped in a porous paper of atleast 100 mm of water gauge.
[0024] Further described herein, without being claimed, is a process for manufacturing of
biodegradable dual densities cigarette comprising the steps of :
subjecting the stem of the tobacco leaf to a conventional conditioning process for
10 to 20 minutes at 30-40° C. to quench the moisture uniformly;
passing the said quenched stem through conditioning tunnel or through a flatner or
a roller to flatten the stem;
cutting the stem into small particles of the size 30 to 180 cpi;
cutting the small particles through an expansion heated tunnel at a temperature of
100 to 103°C for a period of 20 to 30 seconds;
passing the said particles through a drier and a classifier to obtain a cut roll stem
(CRS);
cooling the CRS at room temperature by storing in boxes rolled humidifier;
encapsulating the cooled cut rolled stem in a filter wrapping paper to obtain the
filter butt;
processing the filler or tobacco end with tobacco in the conventional manner,
joining the butt portion in the conventional manner to obtain the biodegradable filler
cigarette.
[0025] The subject invention can better be understood with reference to the accompanying
drawings. However, the same are for illustrative purposes and should not be construed
to restrict the scope of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0026]
Figure 1 illustrates a dual density cigarette having normal density tobacco at one end and
high-density tobacco at other end. The length ratio of normal and high density can
be configured so to maintain the expected smoke delivery profile.
Detailed description of the invention:
[0027] The present invention provides for enhancement of smoke delivery profile comparable
to normal synthetic filter cigarette as well as results in substantial reduction of
tar and nicotine. Due the high density tobacco at the mouth end the sogginess of tobacco
when put into the mouth and the entrance of loose tobacco particles entering into
the mouth is also avoided.
[0028] The cigarette is 100% biodegradable and is cost effective since the conventional
machines can be used.
[0029] This cigarette is to be smoked through high-density end and this high density tobacco
portion is tipped with porous cork tipping paper of different colour for identification
to enable the consumer to know that tipped portion of the cigarette is to be put in
the mouth.
[0030] High-density tobacco rods can be manufactured using tobacco material such as cut
and rolled stem, graded tobacco, reconstituted tobacco, tobacco dust with binders
as well as various combination of above or natural materials.
[0031] Density of such rod may be selected as per individual product need. Normally the
density selected are at least 280 mg/cc. Figure 1 shows that the tobacco or filler
rod (1) is a blend of tobacco wrapped in a cigarette paper at a pressure drop of 22
to 50 mm of water column. The filler rod (1) is filled with blend of tobacco comprising
75 to 85 % of lamina and 15 to 25% of the expanded stem fibres or cutt-roll stem.
The lamina is normal density tobacco of 4-6 cc/gm at the rate of 12.5% oven volatile
preferably 5-6 cc/gm at the rate of 12.5% oven volatile. The butt portion (2) comprising
atleast cut-roll stem particles of expanded fibres of the density of at least 0.28/cc
wrapped in a porous paper of atleast 100 mm of water gauge. The expanded stem is 4-7
cc/gm at the rate of 12.5% oven volatile, preferably 6-7 cc/gm at the rate of 12.5%
oven volatile. The pressure drop in the tobacco rod is 5-9 water column per mm. of
filler end while the pressure drop in the butt end is 3-4 water column per mm. The
stem portion is the mid ribb of tobacco plant leaf having lower nicotinic content
and higher cloride content.
[0032] Normal and high-density tobacco rods are manufactured on any conventional cigarette
making machine using normal cigarette paper as wrapper for the rod. The stem of the
tobacco leaf is subjected to a conventional conditioning process for 10 to 20 minutes
at 30-40° C to quench the moisture uniformly. The quenched stem is passed through
conditioning tunnel or through a flatner or a roller to flaten the stem. The stem
is then cut into small particles of the size 30 to 180 cpi. The small particles are
cut through an expansion heated tunnel at a temperature of 100 to 103° C for a period
of 20 to 30 seconds. The particles are passed through a drier and a classifier to
obtain a cut roll stem (CRS). The CRS are cooled at room temperature by storing in
boxes rolled humidifier. The cooled cut rolled stem are encapsulated in a filter wrapping
paper to obtain the filter butt;.
[0033] The filler or tobacco rods are made to required length are then supplied to assembler,
the purpose of this unit to assemble the normal and high density tobacco filter butts
in the ratio of 5:1.
[0034] The assembler further cuts the high-density rods in suitable pieces normally 4 to
6 pieces called "Plugs" but other combination are also possible. This is followed
by assembly of these "plugs" with the normal tobacco rod and over tipping with the
tipping paper of suitable width, size and colour. The tipping paper or plug wrap can
either be normal or relatively high porous to give required smoke delivery values.
[0035] This specially made dual density cigarette is capable of delivery of smoke profile
comparable to any other conventional filters as is evident from the test results.
[0036] White particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described,
it would be obvious to those skilled in art that various other changes and modifications
can be made without departing from the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended
claims.
[0037] The following table shows the typical example of the property of the butt end:
| |
AVERAGE |
MINIMUM |
MAXIMUM |
| MOISTURE |
10.03 |
9.10 |
10.80 |
| NICOTINE |
0.73 |
0.22 |
1.34 |
| TRS |
10.87 |
2.61 |
20.21 |
| CHLORIDE |
2.70 |
1.28 |
3.59 |
[0038] The following table shows the property of the filler or tobacco rod:
| |
AVERAGE |
MINIMUM |
MAXIMUM |
| MOISTURE |
11.79 |
11.00 |
12.50 |
| NICOTINE |
1.82 |
1.63 |
2.00 |
| TRS |
14.60 |
12.15 |
17.12 |
| CHLORIDE |
0.72 |
0.49 |
0.96 |
[0039] It is clear that the moisture nicotinic content are less in the butt end while TRS
and cloride content are more in the but end as compared to the filler end.
Analytical tests
[0040] A number of analytical tests were conducted to compare the tar and nicotine content
of the non-filter cigarettes, filter cigarettes and dual density cigarettes. The three
analytical tables are as given below:
Table 1 comprises of 3 sub-tables showing the density trend of micro plain cigarettes (Table
1A), Plain and regular filter type cigarettes (Table 1B) and King Size Brands (Table
1C).
The Tables 1A, 1B and 1C show the comparative tobacco density that exists in different brands of cigarette
having a standard length of 59 mm. The data is taken for two years i.e. for the years
2000 and 2001. the figures show that the average density of tobacco in micro plain
brands (Table 1A), filter size brands (Table 1 B) and the king size brands (Table
1C) ranges betwen 232 mg/cc and 264 mg/cc.
The Table 2 features the analytical data showing the comparison of Tar and Nicotine in the non-filter
and dual density cigarettes. The analytical data reveals that the Dual Density Cigarettes
shows lesser value of the tar & nicotine as compared with the non-filter cigarettes
of same lengths.
Table 3 shows the comparison of "tar" and "nicotine" yield obtained from the conventional
filter tipped cigarettes, the dual density cigarettes fitted with present invention
and the non-filter plain cigarette. The table reveals that the quality of smoke delivery
of dual density cigarette is comparable with the filter cigarette. The tar content
of the smoke from the dual density cigarette with a circumference of 24.44 mm is slightly
higher than the tar content in the filter cigarette with the circumference of 24.46
mm.
Table 1A
| DENSITY TREND OF MICRO PLAIN BRANDS |
| BRANDS 59 mm Brands |
Month Year |
JAN |
FEB |
MAR |
APR |
MAY |
JUN |
JUL |
AUG |
SEP |
OCT |
NOV |
DEC |
AVG |
MIN |
MAX |
| Cav Super |
2001 |
259 |
|
|
|
261 |
254 |
253 |
|
|
251 |
252 |
|
256 |
244 |
266 |
| |
2000 |
256 |
259 |
|
257 |
250 |
251 |
266 |
254 |
244 |
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
| FS Super |
2001 |
|
|
|
245 |
272 |
257 |
252 |
255 |
250 |
258 |
250 |
250 |
254 |
245 |
272 |
| |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RW Super |
2001 |
255 |
|
254 |
264 |
260 |
246 |
253 |
233 |
249 |
248 |
255 |
271 |
253 |
233 |
278 |
| |
2000 |
258 |
241 |
254 |
278 |
251 |
266 |
262 |
243 |
245 |
245 |
247 |
242 |
|
|
|
| Bristol Std |
2001 |
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
246 |
264 |
246 |
274 |
| |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Capstan Super |
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
240 |
233 |
246 |
| |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SCISSORS STANDARD |
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
258 |
247 |
268 |
| |
2000 |
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1B
| DENSITY TREND OF PLAIN & REGULAR FILTER SIZE BRANDS |
| BRANDS |
Month Year |
JAN |
FEB |
MAR |
APR |
MAY |
JUN |
JUL |
AUG |
SEP |
OCT |
NOV |
DEC |
AVG |
MIN |
MAX |
| CVGL- 69 mm. |
2001 |
|
261 |
267 |
|
253 |
257 |
260 |
267 |
255 |
263 |
263 |
263 |
260 |
247 |
267 |
| |
2000 |
263 |
247 |
265 |
257 |
261 |
|
|
|
250 |
261 |
265 |
|
|
|
|
| RW Plain - 67 mm |
2001 |
|
|
270 |
273 |
|
|
245 |
272 |
|
249 |
249 |
251 |
252 |
242 |
273 |
| |
2000 |
245 |
243 |
247 |
244 |
251 |
245 |
253 |
255 |
255 |
|
244 |
242 |
|
|
|
| Scissors Plain -68 mm |
2001 |
245 |
248 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
245 |
238 |
248 |
| |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FS Special |
2001 |
254 |
259 |
254 |
257 |
255 |
263 |
267 |
278 |
262 |
260 |
262 |
266 |
260 |
254 |
278 |
| |
2000 |
254 |
255 |
254 |
257 |
255 |
262 |
255 |
267 |
264 |
255 |
270 |
258 |
|
|
|
| FS Premier |
2001 |
260 |
260 |
257 |
259 |
256 |
258 |
256 |
271 |
260 |
261 |
264 |
262 |
260 |
249 |
271 |
| |
2000 |
|
254 |
|
261 |
257 |
260 |
249 |
265 |
257 |
264 |
267 |
252 |
|
|
|
| RW Flake |
2001 |
257 |
253 |
254 |
261 |
261 |
265 |
265 |
|
266 |
252 |
258 |
267 |
258 |
244 |
267 |
| |
2000 |
251 |
255 |
244 |
258 |
255 |
264 |
250 |
255 |
265 |
257 |
265 |
263 |
|
|
|
| GF Premium |
2001 |
|
250 |
263 |
254 |
|
254 |
255 |
|
|
256 |
261 |
257 |
258 |
250 |
266 |
| |
2000 |
|
256 |
|
263 |
266 |
|
261 |
257 |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
| Wills Flake |
2001 |
|
|
256 |
|
|
255 |
262 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
261 |
255 |
274 |
| |
2000 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
264 |
274 |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
Table 1C
| DENSITY TREND OF KING SIZE BRANDS |
| BRANDS |
Month Year |
JAN |
FEB |
MAR |
APR |
MAY |
JUN |
JUL |
AUG |
SEP |
OCT |
NOV |
DEC |
AVG |
MIN |
MAX |
| FS Kings |
2001 |
248 |
246 |
242 |
255 |
251 |
251 |
255 |
266 |
257 |
253 |
252 |
255 |
252 |
242 |
266 |
| |
2000 |
250 |
247 |
254 |
248 |
246 |
252 |
255 |
255 |
257 |
249 |
257 |
248 |
|
|
|
| GF kings |
2001 |
|
251 |
249 |
247 |
|
249 |
249 |
|
|
253 |
|
260 |
251 |
244 |
264 |
| |
2000 |
|
252 |
257 |
|
252 |
244 |
244 |
248 |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
| Classic Kings |
2001 |
|
264 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
249 |
244 |
255 |
| |
2000 |
|
247 |
|
255 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
| BH Sp |
2001 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
233 |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
242 |
233 |
249 |
| |
2000 |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
| 555 Kings |
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
244 |
243 |
245 |
| |
2000 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
| Marlboro |
2001 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
233 |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
232 |
225 |
235 |
| Lights |
2000 |
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3
| Smoke parameters |
59 x 24.5 PI. |
69 x 24.5 x 11 mm CRS |
59 x 24.5 x 11 mm CA |
| ISO Tar |
16.6 |
15.4 |
14.9 |
| Nicotine |
1.49 |
1.27 |
1.27 |
| Circumference |
24.57 |
24.44 |
24.46 |
1. A biodegradable dual density cigarette composing a tobacco or filler rod and butt
portion joined to each other longitudinally in a ratio of 5:1 wherein the tobacco
rod is a blend cf tobacco wrapped in a cigarette paper at a pressure drop of 22 to
50 mm of water column, the butt portion comprising at least cut-roll stem particles
of expanded fibres of density of at least 0.28 gm/cc wrapped in a porous paper of
at least 100 mm water column.
2. A biodegradable dual density cigarette, according to claim 1, wherein the blend of
tobacco comprises 75 to 85 % of lamina and 15 to 25% of the expanded stem fibres (CRS).
3. A biodegradable dual density cigarette, according to claim 2, wherein the lamina is
normal density tobacco of 4-6 cc/gm at the rate of 12.5% oven volatile preferably
5-6 cc/gm, at the rate of 12.5% oven volatile.
4. A biodegradable dual density cigarette, according to claim 2, wherein the expanded
stem is 4-7 cc/gm at the rate of 12.5% oven volatile preferably 6-7 cc/gm at the rate
of 12.5% oven volatile.
5. A biodegradable dual density cigarette, according to claim 1, wherein the pressure
drop in the filler or tobacco rod is 5-9 water column per mm. of filler and while
the pressure drop in the butt portion is 3-4 water column per mm.
6. A biodegradable dual density cigarette, according to claim 2, wherein the expanded
stem is the mid rib of tobacco plant leaf having lower nicotinic content and higher
chloride content.
7. A biodegradable dual density cigarette, according to claim 2, wherein the butt portion
is wrapped in a porous paper having a resistance to burning compared to the cigarette
paper of the filler rod.
8. A biodegradable dual density cigarette, according to claim 2, wherein the said butt
portion comprising a mixture of tobacco fibre, tobacco dust with binders and lower
grade of tobacco.
1. Biologisch abbaubare Zigarette mit zwei Dichten umfassend eine Tabak- oder Füllstückstange
und einen Kippenteil, die in Längsrichtung in einem Verhältnis von 5:1 miteinander
verbunden sind, wobei die Tabakstange eine Tabakmischung umfasst, die in ein Zigarettenpapier
bei einem Druckabfall von 22 bis 50 mm Wassersäule gewickelt ist, wobei der Kippenteil
zumindest geschnittene und gewalzte Stengelteilchen expandierter Fasern einer Dichte
von mindestens 0.28 g/cm3, die in poröses Papier von mindestens 100 mm Wassersäule gewickelt sind, umfasst.
2. Biologisch abbaubare Zigarette mit zwei Dichten gemäß Anspruch 1, wobei die Tabakmischung
75 bis 85 % Blattmaterial und 15 bis 25 % der expandierten Stengelfasern (CRS) umfasst.
3. Biologisch abbaubare Zigarette mit zwei Dichten gemäß Anspruch 2, wobei das Blattmaterial
normal dichter Tabak von 4 bis 6 cm3/g bei einer Rate von 12.5 % ofenflüchtigen Stoffen, vorzugsweise von 5 bis 6 cm3/g bei einer Rate von 12.5 % ofenflüchtigen Stoffen ist.
4. Biologisch abbaubare Zigarette mit zwei Dichten gemäß Anspruch 2, wobei der expandierte
Stengel 4 bis 7 cm3/g bei einer Rate von 12.5 % ofenflüchtigen Stoffen, vorzugsweise 6 bis 7 cm3/g bei der Rate von 12.5 % ofenflüchtigen Stoffen ist.
5. Biologisch abbaubare Zigarette mit zwei Dichten gemäß Anspruch 1, wobei der Druckabfall
in der Füllstück- oder Tabakstange 5 bis 9 mm Wassersäule pro mm Füllstück beträgt,
während der Druckabfall in dem Kippenteil 3 bis 4 mm Wassersäule pro mm beträgt.
6. Biologisch abbaubare Zigarette mit zwei Dichten nach Anspruch 2, wobei der expandierte
Stengel die Mittelrippen des Tabakpflanzenblattes mit einem geringeren Nikotingehalt
und einem höheren Chloridgehalt aufweist.
7. Biologisch abbaubare Zigarette mit zwei Dichten nach Anspruch 2, wobei der Kippenteil
in ein poröses Papier eingewickelt ist, welches im Vergleich zum Zigarettenpapier
der Füllstückstange einen Widerstand gegenüber dem Verbrennen aufweist.
8. Biologisch abbaubare Zigarette mit zwei Dichten nach Anspruch 2, wobei der Kippenteil
eine Mischung aus Tabakfaser, Tabakstaub mit Bindemitteln und Tabak geringerer Güte
umfasst.
1. Cigarette de densité double biodégradable comprenant un boudin continu de tabac ou
d'apport et une portion de butée, liés l'un à l'autre dans le sens de la longueur
dans une proportion de 5 pour 1, dans laquelle le boudin continu de tabac est un mélange
de tabac enveloppé dans un papier à cigarettes avec une chute de pression de 22 à
50 mm de colonne d'eau, la portion de butée comprenant au moins des particules à base
de côtes laminées et hachées de fibres expansées d'une densité d'au moins 0,28g/cm3 enveloppées dans un papier poreux avec au moins 100 mm de colonne d'eau.
2. Cigarette de densité double biodégradable, selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle
le mélange de tabac comprend entre 75 et 85% de parenchyme et 15 à 25% de fibres expansées
à base de côtes (CRS).
3. Cigarette de densité double biodégradable, selon la revendication 2, dans laquelle
le parenchyme est un tabac de densité normale de 4-6 cm3/g avec un taux de 12,5% volatile dans un four et de préférence 5-6 cm3/g avec un taux de 12,5% volatile dans un four.
4. Cigarette de densité double biodégradable, selon la revendication 2, dans laquelle
la côte expansée est de 4-7 cm3/g avec un taux de 12,5% volatile dans un four et de préférence 6-7 cm3/g avec un taux de 12,5% volatile dans un four.
5. Cigarette de densité double biodégradable, selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle
la chute de pression dans la boudin continu de tabac ou d'apport est de 5-9 mm de
colonne d'eau par mm d'apport alors que la chute de pression dans la portion de butée
est de 3-4 mm de colonne d'eau par mm.
6. Cigarette de densité double biodégradable, selon la revendication 2, dans laquelle
la côte expansée est la demi nervure de la feuille de la plante de tabac présentant
une teneur en nicotine plus faible et une teneur en chlorure plus élevée.
7. Cigarette de double densité biodégradable, selon la revendication 2, dans laquelle
la portion de butée est enveloppée dans un papier poreux présentant une résistance
à la combustion par rapport au papier à cigarettes du boudin continu d'apport.
8. Cigarette de double densité biodégradable, selon la revendication 2, dans laquelle
ladite portion de butée comprend un mélange de fibres de tabac, de poussières de tabac
avec des liants et une qualité de tabac inférieure.