Object of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to a new diagnostic method for diagnosis of partial
discharges (PDs) which complements the methods and systems for the continuous monitoring
of (PDs) permanently installed in high voltage equipment or installations and consuming
longer calculation time periods for analysing the measurements. The new invention
reduces the analysis time, which allows performing real time diagnoses of the insulation
condition of high voltage equipment and installations. Additionally, the new invention
allows performing the diagnosis either by using the high voltage power grid itself
(measurements in service) or with a novel voltage source designed therefor (measurements
out of service) as a voltage source. The term high voltage equipment must be understood
as a voltage and/or alternating or direct current generator, power transformer, voltage
and/or current measurement and/or protection transformer, control switchgear, insulators
and surge arresters, and the term high voltage installation must be understood as:
high voltage cable systems with their junction and termination accessories, gas-insulated
transmission lines, gas-insulated sub-stations and a metal-enclosed high voltage switchgear
assembly.
[0002] The new method proposed by the present invention improves the processing time of
the measured signals and achieves identifying the different focal points of PDs existing
in the measured installation. It additionally includes a novel system for generating
a high test voltage suitable for applying the new method when the grid voltage is
not used (measurements out of service).
Background and Summary of the Invention
[0003] The measurement of partial discharges has proven to be the most effective method
for the diagnosis of the high voltage insulation equipment, machines and installations,
such as measurement and protection transformers, switchgear, power transformers and
reactors, alternators, gas-insulated sub-stations, cables with their installed accessories
and gas-insulated lines.
[0004] A "partial discharge" must be understood in the context of this document as an electric
discharge affecting a limited part of the insulation where it is produced, without
causing its immediate failure, but its progressive degradation, except in the case
of ambient air which is renewed naturally.
[0005] The practical difficulties in partial discharge measurements in equipment and installations
proposed to be solved by the present invention are:
- On one hand, the high calculation and analysis time consumption which powerful and
complex numerical tools require for applying the mathematical algorithms for discriminating
the interfering electric noise masking the electric PD signals due to defects in the
high voltage insulation.
- On the other hand, the difficulty in identifying and discriminating the total number
of the PD sources for the purpose of separating them from one another and being able
to identify each of them with the defect originating it.
- And finally, the difficulty in generating high test voltages with alternating voltage
waveforms of the same frequency as the grid service frequency (50 Hz or 60 Hz) without
requiring large volume and heavy generators.
[0006] The current techniques applied for real time PD measurements performed in the field
relate to solving some of these problems in a different manner, but with serious limitations,
as explained below:
- a) Problems in real time electric background noise discrimination:
[0007] Most known methods treat the electric background noise problem by means of filtering
the recorded signal in a frequency band in which the noise is presumably located.
Filtering is sometimes performed for selective frequencies in a narrow frequency band.
[0008] It must be pointed out that the very conception of this filtering technique removes
or attenuates the noise together with the PD signal for the filtered frequency range.
[0009] Another known method analyses the frequency spectrum of the noise signal for the
purpose of choosing a measurement frequency band where the amplitude of the noise
is the lowest possible amplitude. The drawback of this method is that sometimes the
smallest noise signal band coincides with the band where the PD signal is also weak
in amplitude, so PD measurement is difficult.
[0010] Another method which relates to removing noise by means of classifying the recorded
signals (PDs + noise) into clusters is also known. The clusters are formed by means
of determining parameters associated with the signal shape (duration and frequency)
and its amplitude. The specific drawback of this method is that the processing is
performed by signal level, such that to assure the capture of PD signals the acquisition
level must be reduced, and therefore the noise signal content considerably increases.
Processing becomes very laborious because the noise is put together with the PDs.
[0011] None of these methods is efficient for white noise, the spectrum of which covers
all the frequencies of the PD signal. Frequency filtering techniques cannot be applied
because the PD signal would also be lost, and a noiseless frequency band cannot be
chosen either because there is a noise signal in all of them and PD clusters having
a frequency different from that of the noise cannot be distinguished either.
[0012] An efficient technique for white noise is to apply the Wavelet transform of the recorded
signal and statistically analysing its components in order to find transient events
characteristic of PD pulses which are distinguished from the statistical evolution
of the electric noise. The huge drawback of this technique for real time measurements
is the high numerical processing time consumption of the recorded signals for discriminating
noise from the PDs.
[0013] In the proposal of the new invention, noise is removed by applying the Wavelet transform
to the recorded signal and statistically analysing its components for the purpose
of finding events characteristic of PD pulses. The problem of the high processing
time consumption required by this method is sought to be solved by means of multiple
signal processing. High computing devices developed for personal computers, such as
for example graphics cards having several multiprocessor units (GPGPU, General-Purpose
Computing on Graphics Processing Units) allow drastically reducing calculation times,
making the application of this powerful analysis technique to real time diagnostics
viable.
b) Problem with identifying and discriminating different PD sources:
[0014] Most known methods relate to identifying and discriminating the total number of PD
sources through locating PD pulses, for example for locating PDs in a cable, the theory
of wave propagation through a cable is used, either by using the reflectometry technique
or by using the technique of arrival time delays of one and the same PD signal to
two or more sensors distributed along the length of the cable.
[0015] The efficacy of these methods for identifying and discriminating different PD sources
is limited by the uncertainty in the location of the PD source, which can be a few
metres, such that it is impossible to assure that there is only one PD source in a
specific location (for example in a cable termination accessory), one PD source being
able to mask others located nearby. This is particularly critical when the predominating
PD source is associated with a danger-free phenomenon, such as for example corona
in air, other PD sources co-existing close to it having a smaller amplitude but a
higher risk of failure, such as defects inside the insulation for example.
[0016] Some techniques use the phase displacement of the PDs in relation to the applied
voltage for identifying different PD sources. Characteristic phase resolved PD patterns
in phase of the test voltage, which are referred to as reference PD patterns, are
known to be produced as a function of the type of defect (cavity inside the insulation,
surface discharge in dirty or faulty insulations, corona effect in air in sharp-pointed
conductive parts, etc.). If the measured pattern is compared with the reference patterns,
it is possible to observe whether there is a single defect or several defects. However,
when there are several defects, their corresponding patterns can overlap and be easily
confused with one another, without it being easy to identify each and every one of
them, the operator's experience being crucial for a correct diagnosis. Additionally,
the noise not removed in many commercial techniques makes the identification of different
PD sources through the simple visual observation of their patterns of PDs even more
difficult.
[0017] Another more advanced technique establishes PD clusters as a function of two shape
parameters of each PD pulse: pulse duration and pulse oscillation frequency. However,
the shape of the PD signal can be very different as a function of the rise time and
fall time of the PD pulse envelope, even though the PD signal has the same total duration
and the same oscillation frequency.
[0018] The proposal of the new invention relates to solving this problem by characterizing
the shape of the PD pulse by means of three parameters instead of two: parameter correlated
with the front time of the envelope of the pulse, parameter correlated with the fall
time of the envelope of the pulse and parameter correlated with the pulse oscillation
frequency. The degree of discrimination of different PD clusters, particularly when
there are a number of pulses to be distinguished having a similar duration, is improved
with this technique.
c) Problem with generating high test voltages having the same frequency as the grid
voltage for PD measurement in large installations:
[0019] Many generating systems used for testing large high voltage installations, such as
for example cables several kilometres long, generate high test voltages with waveforms
that are very different from the waveform of the service voltage in the power grid
where the equipment operates (sinusoidal alternating voltage of 50 Hz or 60 Hz) for
the purpose of not having to require a high power supply.
[0020] The first technique developed for on-site PD measurement tests was the very low frequency
generator (0.1 Hz or 0.01 Hz). The low frequency of the generated voltage increases
hundreds of times if it is 0.1 Hz, or thousands of times if it is 0.01 Hz, the capacitive
reactance of the installation to be tested and, the power required during the test
is thereby reduced in virtually the same proportion.
[0021] The drawback of this technique is that the generated alternating voltage wave duration
is hundreds of times higher if it is 0.1 Hz or thousands of times higher if it is
0.01 Hz than the sinusoidal wave duration of 50 Hz or 60 Hz of the power grid where
the high voltage equipment and installations operate. The voltage distribution inside
insulations and the dielectric behaviour of insulations are known to be different
for 0.1 Hz and 0.01 Hz voltages than for 50 Hz or 60 Hz voltages, so the tests do
not reliably reflect the behaviour of the insulation when it is subjected to the grid
voltage.
[0022] Damped alternating voltage generators generating high damped oscillating voltages
having frequencies comprised between a tenth of a hertz and a kilohertz, which consist
of charging the equipment or installation to be tested with a high direct voltage
source and causing a damped oscillating voltage when discharging it on a coil, have
emerged in recent years. The resistive value of the test circuit conductor causes
the damping of the generated alternating voltage wave.
[0023] The limitation of this technique is that the maximum oscillating test voltage is
applied only in the first crest of the voltage. The inevitable damping of the oscillating
voltage wave provoked by the self-resistance of the actual circuit means that in the
next wave half-periods have smaller amplitude and the wave is more considerably attenuated
by a few tenths of a millisecond, causing less dielectric stress in the insulation.
Dielectric stress, and therefore the result of the PD measurement in insulations,
is known to depend not only on the instantaneous level of the test voltage, but also
on the applied voltage duration. Therefore, UNE standard 60270 establishes the PD
measurement in pC as the largest PD value occurring repeatedly throughout the test.
For that purpose, the PD measurement instrument must be read as a function of the
repetition rate of PD pulses per second, during which time the test voltage must remain
constant without attenuation or damping.
[0024] Additionally, it is important to point out that the most common surge stresses in
electric power transmission and distribution grids are due to single-phase short circuits
causing surges in healthy phases during a time interval of the order of a few tenths
of a second or even a second until the protections act. Accordingly, surges lasting
a few hundredths of a second produced by the damped oscillating waves indicated in
the preceding paragraph are not representative of the temporary surges of the grid.
[0025] The most advanced technical solution today for generating test voltages having the
same frequency as the grid (50 Hz or 60 Hz) are fixed frequency LC resonant systems
with variable inductance. The drawback of these systems is the required weight and
volume.
[0026] Variable frequency LC resonant systems have also been developed having as advantages
in relation to fixed frequency resonant systems a smaller generator weight (between
half and five times less than the weight) and the higher compensated power ratio in
relation to the active power required (between 1.2 to 2 times higher), but in contrast,
the frequency is not exactly the grid frequency, but values comprised between 20 Hz
and 300 Hz, which does not comply with the ideal target of testing insulations at
the actual frequency of the grid where they operate (50 Hz or 60 Hz).
[0027] The proposal of the new invention seeks to solve this problem by compensating the
reactive power by means of power electronics if the three phases are tested simultaneously
by means of a FACT system. The weight and volume of the generator is also reduced
by means of generating a high alternating voltage of 50 Hz during short time periods,
of the order of a second, as if it were a temporary surge characteristic of a short
circuit in the grid, then waiting a time interval to apply the test voltage again.
A feasible example with current technology is to apply two seconds of test voltage
for each real time minute, such that in 5 minutes a total of 500 wave periods of 50
Hz is provided, figure that is more than enough for the statistical treatment of the
PD measurements which allows evaluating insulation condition. This method for testing,
measuring and analysing allows requiring only maximum active power stresses in very
isolated cases from the generator and thereby greatly reducing the weight and volume
of the generator to values lower than those of the techniques used today.
Brief Description of the Drawing
[0028] For the purpose of complementing the description and making the explanation thereof
easier, Figure 1 is attached for a non-limiting illustrative purpose, depicting a
flow chart illustrating the method of the present invention;
Description of an Embodiment of the Invention
[0029] As mentioned above, the present invention consists of a method for measuring and
analysing the measurement, for a real time evaluation of the insulation condition
of high voltage cables during their operation in the grid or when they are not connected
to the network, which improves the techniques used today and corrects the drawbacks
associated with these techniques as stated.
[0030] The objective of the present invention is to provide a new method for measuring and
analysing the measurement of partial discharges for the real time evaluation of the
insulation condition of high voltage machines, apparatuses, equipment and installations
such as insulated cables, either during their normal operation in the grid or out
of service in the grid, by means of using a test generator specifically designed for
applying the indicated new method for measuring and analysing.
[0031] The present invention allows reducing the time necessary for analysing the measurement,
for the purpose of performing a real time diagnosis, by the parallel use of several
computing multiprocessors developed for personal computers. The new method also allows
discriminating different focal points or sources producing partial discharges, both
those occurring in locations that are physically close to one another, for example
in one and the same high voltage apparatus, machine or element, such as in a cable
junction or termination, or those occurring far from one another in different apparatuses,
machines or other parts of a high voltage installation.
[0032] To apply the method for measuring, it is necessary to use a PD measurement system
and a high voltage measurement system, both referring to the same time basis. The
PD measurement system will be formed by an electromagnetic sensor working in a frequency
range comprised between 50 kHz and 20 MHz and a high speed sampling digital recording
channel controlled by a personal computer.
[0033] The method for evaluating the insulation condition of installations having a certain
length (greater than 20 m) requires two measurement and measurement analysis systems
synchronised in time, for example through a GPS signal. Each PD measurement system
is located in a different position of the high voltage installation, spaced from one
another by at least 20 m. PD sensors integrated in each accessory or external sensors
outside the high voltage equipment can be used for that purpose.
[0034] Additionally, when the PD measurement is taken in high voltage installations there
can be short range PD sensors, such as very high frequency (VHF) sensors, ultra high
frequency (UHF) sensors or acoustic sensors which only detect PDs produced close to
the sensor (a few metres away from the sensor), so they must be placed in points where
PDs are suspected to occur or in critical positions where the consequences of a failure
would be disastrous. The comparison between the PD pulses acquired by these latter
sensors located in a piece of equipment or accessory (for example a cable termination
or junction) and the PD pulses detected by the electromagnetic sensors working between
20 kHZ and 20 MHz help to ratify the position of the PD sources.
[0035] This objective has been fully achieved with the present invention and is characterised
by the attached claims in which the claimed method contemplates the stages that are
described below and schematically shown in relation to the flow chart of Figure 1
of the drawing. Therefore:
[0036] The method for measuring partial discharges requires the sequence of stages indicated
below. When the PD measurements are applied to high voltage installations, such as
insulated cables, the first six stages are also repeated in the two synchronised measurement
systems. It is also possible to take a PD measurement in smaller, individual equipment,
such as electric machines (generators and transformers), switchgear, measurement transformers,
using a single measurement system being sufficient, in which case the seventh and
eighths (blocks 1.7 and 1.8) are not applied.
[0037] A first stage of the method (block 1.1) consists of performing captures starting
in the instant of exact seconds of the UTC (Universal Time Coordinated). This capture
start signal is achieved, for example, from the PPS (pulse per second) signal of a
GPS receiver in a fixed position and by means of the sensing of at least four satellites,
it achieves errors of absolute time of less than 10 nanoseconds. The capture process
collects, on one hand, the signal coming from the PD sensor; the signal measurement
is also collected by the test voltage sensor, plus the grid voltage signal (in the
event that the excitation is not the grid voltage). The part of the signal collected
by the PD sensor that will be used corresponds to an integer "n" of test voltage periods
(n for 20 ms for 50 Hz voltages). Where a period starts and ends is established by
means of analysing the test voltage signal. The number "n" of periods of each capture
depends on the available memory for storing data and on the need to update results
on the observation screen. During the PD capture time period, the applied voltage
must be the test voltage for the PD measurement. When the grid voltage signal, in
addition to the test voltage signal, has been collected it enables performing the
following steps in relation to any of the two reference signals.
[0038] The second stage (block 1.2) consists of segmenting the total capture interval into
"n" complete time periods of the reference signal (having a duration of 20 ms for
the 50 Hz reference signal) which will primarily be the test voltage, but it can possibly
be the grid voltage when it is different from the test voltage for the purpose of
performing the numerical analysis of the PD signal measurement relating to the separation
of the electric noise and the calculation of parameters of the PD-type signals in
the next stages 3 and 4 (blocks 1.3 and 1.4 respectively) for each of the individual
periods.
[0039] The third stage (block 1.3) consists of the real time separation of the electric
noise from the signal acquired by the PD sensor by use of multiprocessors. The electric
noise is a mixture of signals coupled to the PD signals, either in a conducted manner
through the power supply system or the grounding system, or transmitted in a broadcast
manner, for example by radio stations, mobile telephones, etc.
[0040] The removal of the electric noise is performed by means of numerical treatment of
the captured signals consisting of applying the Wavelet transform to the acquired
signal and statistically analysing its components for the purpose of finding transient
events characteristic of PD signals which are distinguished from the statistical evolution
of the electric noise.
[0041] The processing time of the signal applied for the numerical treatment for removing
noise is drastically reduced, sharing out the numerical calculation tasks between
the available "m" multiprocessors of the GPGPU used for that purpose. The greater
the process time reduction achieved, the higher the number of multiprocessors available,
the higher the clock frequencies of the processors, the clock frequency of the memory
and the communication bandwidth with the main memory. The time reduction ratio achieved
allows easily processing each 20 ms period of the signal coming from the PD sensor
in a time of 100 ms, which allows updating the results screen instantaneously for
visual purposes.
[0042] In the fourth stage (block 1.4) the individual PD signals are processed for the purpose
of determining the following parameters for each PD-type signal: the absolute arrival
time t
i of the PD pulse in reference to the UTC time signal (for example GPS signal), the
phase angle over time φ
i in relation to the zero-crossing of the test voltage signal. When the test voltage
is different from the grid voltage, the phase angle over time φ
ri is also determined in relation to the zero-crossing of the grid voltage signal. The
representation in relation to the grid signal allows differentiating PD events distant
from the test voltage.
[0043] The parameters identifying the shape of the PD-type signal are also calculated. The
current waveform corresponding to each PD-type signal, damped oscillating transient
wave i
i(t), is modelled by means of a sinusoidal function g
i (first part of formula (1)), modulated by an function envelope e
i (second part of formula (1)), which is defined in this invention as the asymmetrical
hyperbolic secant because it corresponds with the mathematical hyperbolic secant function
in which the parameters of the two exponential functions of the denominator are no
longer equal in order to lose the symmetry in relation to the y-axis (second part
of the equation (1)).

[0044] Where:
- t is the time variable,
- gi(t) is the sinusoidal function associated with the i-th pulse having a frequency fi=[ωi/2π] displaced ψi radians for the instant t=0,
- ωi pulse of the sinusoidal wave associated with the i-th pulse,
- ψi is the angular displacement of the sinusoidal wave associated with the i-th pulse
for the time instant t=0,
- ei is a function similar to the expression of the hyperbolic secant associated with
the i-th pulse which, when the parameters αi and βi are different, asymmetry is achieved. This function modulates the amplitude Ai of the sinusoidal function gi.
- t0i is the temporal displacement of the asymmetrical hyperbolic secant modulating the
i-th oscillation pulse.
- Ai is the parameter directly correlated with the maximum amplitude of the envelope
in combination with αi and βi.
- αi and βi are the envelope shape parameters correlated to the front time and the tail time
of the envelope wave.
[0045] Formula (1) has been obtained after an in-depth investigation of different mathematical
models which best fit with the transient evolution of the damped oscillating pulse
characteristic of a PD, with the parameters necessary for representing any type of
PD signal and with a sensitivity of their parameters suitable for numerical calculation.
[0046] The best option of the six shape parameters t
0i, ψ
i, f
i, A
i, α
i and β
i for the "i-th" PD-type pulse is determined by means of a genetic search algorithm.
[0047] The use of multiple processors allows assigning to each processor the parameter search
operations such that they better define each PD pulse. The parallel work of the "m"
multiprocessors allows determining a broad set of genetic variations (around 4000)
of each PD pulse for the purpose of choosing the best option for each of the PD pulses.
[0048] In the fifth stage (block 1.5), the best shape parameters determined for each PD-type
pulse, are stored in the database of the computer controlling the measuring system.
[0049] Even though there are six shape parameters determined by means of the indicated numerical
processing, the parameters that are independent of the instant which a PD is produced
are the following three: pulse oscillation frequency, f
i, rising rate and falling rate of the PD pulse envelope (associated with the parameters
α
i and β
i). The parameters t
0i and ψ
i are parameters that can be attributed to displacements over time of the functions
g
i(t) and e
i(t), and the parameter A
i corresponds to a scaling factor.
[0050] In the sixth stage (block 1.6), the process of the third, fourth and fifth stages
(blocks 1.3 a 1.5) is repeated until completing the acquired "n" periods.
[0051] In the seventh stage (block 1.7), the first stage (block 1.1) is repeated to enable
again applying the stages comprised between the second and the sixth stages (blocks
1.2 to 1.6), until completing a statistically representative number of acquisitions
so that the PDs can be immediately and reliably clustered by position, the PDs can
be clustered in each position according to the shape of the pulse and the results
of each PD source (magnitude, rate and phase resolved pattern of the voltage) can
be determined, corresponding to the ninth, tenth and eleventh stages (blocks 1.9,
1.10 and 1.11 respectively). The number of acquisitions that is considered statistically
minimum for reliably performing the mentioned analysis is 250, but the higher this
number the more reliable the diagnosis will be.
[0052] The eighth stage (block 1.8) consists of representing the values of magnitude of
the phase resolved discharge of the test voltage (φ
i). When the grid voltage is different from the test voltage, the same values of the
magnitude of the phase resolved discharge of the grid voltage (φ
ri) are also represented. When the PDs are correlated to the phase of the grid voltage
(φ
ri), the representation of the magnitude of the phase resolved discharge of the test
voltage (φ
i) will be distributed without any reference pattern; whereas the magnitude of the
phase resolved discharges of the grid voltage will correspond to a reference pattern.
This allows excluding PDs originating from the grid voltage and which are therefore
not generated in the element under testing.
[0053] The ninth stage (block 1.9) consists of communicating both computers so that both
databases containing PD pulse parameters obtained by both independent measurement
systems can be correlated using the acquisitions synchronised in time by means of
UTC, for example GPS.
[0054] In the tenth stage (block 1.10), the PD sources detected in different discrete positions
throughout the installation are clustered together. Taking into account the data stored
in the databases of the two measurement systems corresponding to the fifth stage (blocks
1.5), the position map of the PD sources is determined as a function of the position
that the PD-type signals occupy along the length of the cable. The mentioned map is
constructed as a function of the delay in arrival to each sensor of the PD pulses
paired by proximity, x
i (Δ
ti), taking into account the maximum time delay possible between two PD pulses, the
ratio between the maximum length to be travelled and the propagation speed.
[0055] "Position of PD pulses" must be understood as positions having a minimum length of
about 3 m. The position is identified in relation to the relative distance to a specific
sensor used as a reference.
[0056] The eleventh stage (block 1.11) consists of separating the PDs located in one and
the same position, those having PD pulses with different shape parameters. It is known
that the shape of the PD pulse (rise time, fall time, oscillation frequency) can change
as a function of the physical phenomenon associated with a PD, of the distance travelled
by the PD and of the test and measurement circuit. Accordingly, if there are different
types of defects in a single position that produce PD-type signals, it will be possible
to identify the different PD sources through the shape parameters associated with
the PD pulses of each source generating PDs.
[0057] A three-dimensional representation of the most representative shape parameters of
the pulses, f
i, α
i and β
i, is made to enable applying this step, and a clustering tool is applied for determining
the different focal points associated with different sets of discharges in said three-dimensional
space.
[0058] The twelfth stage (block 1.12) consists of determining the measurement and analysis
results for each PD source: magnitude of the PD, rate of repetition of the PD and
pattern of the phase resolved PDs for the voltage. The magnitude of the PD pulses
and the rate of repetition of PD signals are determined for each PD source as mean
values of each acquisition second. These two pieces of data are determined by statistical
analysis of the set of PDs located in the each position where PDs occur:
[0059] The magnitude of the partial discharge is determined as the largest magnitude repeatedly
occurring in each of the sensors, which is calculated through the quasi-peak value
of the amplitudes of the PD signals recorded per each second of signal captured. The
amplitude of each PD pulse sensed by each sensor is corrected as a function of the
length travelled.
[0060] The rate of repetition is determined as the mean value of the PD-type signals of
a certain level detected in a time period at least throughout an acquisition second.
[0061] The risk of insulation failure is known to depend on the physical process causing
the PD pulses, e.g., corona in air pulses are not crucial for causing the dielectric
breakdown of the insulation, but partial discharges due to an internal cavity-type
defect are critical for the insulation service life. It is therefore very important
to know the type of defect associated with each PD source to enable evaluating the
insulation condition of a cable and of its accessories (terminals and junctions).
The representation of the magnitude of the discharge in relation to the phase with
reference to the test voltage (φ
i) of the pulses of each PD source generates visual patterns which experience has proven
to be highly correlated to the different types of phenomena causing the occurrence
PD events. The recognition of the formed pattern allows evaluating the risk of failure
of each of the PD sources. A neural network for pattern recognition is applied to
each of the PD sources detected for automatic recognition, the training of which network
has been conducted based on the patterns offered by laboratory samples and field tests
through which the type of defect is known with certainty.
[0062] In the thirteenth stage the measurement and analysis results for each PD source (magnitude,
rate of repetition and phase resolved pattern of the voltage) are stored in a database
(block 1.13).
[0063] In the fourteenth stage (block 1.14), the eleventh to the thirteenth stages (blocks
1.11 to 1.13) are repeated for each PD source located in a specific position, and
in stage fifteenth (block 1.15) the preceding process is again repeated for each set
of PDs located in the different positions of the cable.
[0064] A user interface (block 1.16), schematically shown in Figure 1, allows showing the
processed data for performing the final evaluation of the insulation condition of
the cable from the following information:
- Position map of the PDs where the PD sources are located (block 1.10).
- Clusters of different PD sources in each position (block 1.11).
- Results obtained from each PD source as a function of time: magnitude, rate of repetition,
phase resolved pattern of the voltage for each PD source (block 1.12).
- Type of defect associated with each source obtained from the neural network (block
1.12).
[0065] The new method for monitoring partial discharges in cables that are installed and
in service for discriminating, locating, measuring, identifying and diagnosing partial
discharge sources has been sufficiently described above. Additionally, another object
of the invention is the implementation of a system for carrying out said method, which
will be described below.
[0066] According to the invention, the physical system for applying the proposed method
is made up of one or two sub-systems for measuring and analysing the measurement of
partial discharges and a sub-system for generating high alternating 50 Hz voltage
particularly designed and suited to the mentioned method for measuring when the PD
measurements must be performed without the grid voltage (out of service). In the event
that the measurements are taken under service conditions or when they are taken under
out of service conditions, the diagnosis of the insulation condition is done in the
same manner in brief time periods.
PD measurement sub-systems for applying the method.
[0067] For the complete application of the method for measuring and analysing described
in the flow chart of Figure 1 it is necessary to use two measurement systems, MS,
for measuring each of the PD signals located at opposing ends of the installation
to be tested. The MS include a PD measurement sensor, a measurement sensor for measuring
the waveform of the test high voltage, a measurement sensor for measuring the waveform
of the high voltage of the grid, a digital recorder, a UTC receiver, for example GPS,
a personal computer with multiple processing capacity and a portable computer for
remote control for the purpose of isolating the operator.
[0068] The PD-type signals together with the electric background noise present are captured
and recorded by the measurement system (MS) in a synchronised manner through the UTC
time reference (block 1.1 of the flow chart of Figure 1). Each MS performs the processing
of the collected signals:
- It segments the capture time into periods to perform the analysis (block 1.2),
- discriminates the electric background noise from the PD-type signals (block 1.3),
- determines the parameters representative of each PD pulse (block 1.4) and stores them
(block 1.5),
- repeats the process until completing the capture period (blocks 1.6 and 1.7),
- the PDs originated by the grid voltage far from the element under testing are excluded
(block 1.8).
[0069] After the capture and the first processing of signals performed separately by each
measurement system (blocks 1.1 to 1.8), both measurement systems are interconnected,
with or without a cable, to transfer the data to one of them from the other. Any of
the two computers has the necessary calculation tools for completing the processing
of the analysis of the measurement and obtaining the final results of the evaluation
of the insulation condition (blocks 1.10 to 1.17) for the purpose of displaying said
results on the screen of the computer used (block 1.17 of the flow chart of Figure
1).
[0070] Each measurement system, MS, arranged in the installation under testing is made up
of:
- one Partial Discharge Sensor per phase to be analyzed, PDS. The non-invasive sensors
used are high frequency current transformers (HFCT) having a bandwidth comprised between
1 MHz and 20 MHz which are arranged coupled to the conductors of the connections to
ground. The invasive sensors are integrated in equipment or elements of the installation,
- one Test Voltage Sensor, TVS, for measuring the waveform of the test voltage. In the
event of measurements in service, an output of a measurement and protection transformer
of the actual grid, or a sensor capacitively coupled to the phase where the measurement
is taken, can be used. A 50 Hz current transformer arranged in a ground connection
of the high voltage cables can also alternatively be used. In this latter case, the
electric phase difference of the measured capacitive current signal must be delayed
90° in relation to the voltage wave object of measurement. If the measurement is taken
when out of service, the signal will be obtained from the low voltage branch of a
voltage divider by means of a high alternating voltage generator,
- a Grid Voltage Sensor, GVS, for measuring the grid voltage waveform in the event that
it is different from the test voltage. An output of a measurement and protection transformer
of the actual network, or a 50 Hz current transformer arranged in the conductor of
the ground connection of the high voltage cables not forming part of the test and
connected to the grid voltage can be used. In this latter case, the electric phase
difference of the mainly capacitive current signal must be delayed 90° in relation
to the voltage wave object of measurement,
- a card for receiving the UTC time signal, for example a GPS card which is synchronised
with the UTC time by means of the PPS (Pulse Per Second) signal, allowing the synchronised
Trigger Pulse Generation (TPG),
- a Digital Recording, DR, Card triggered by the synchronisation pulse coming from the
TPG. The PDS is connected to a channel of the DR, the sampling speed and vertical
resolution of which is at least 100 Mega-samples per second and 10 bits, respectively.
The channel intended for the voltage waveform could have much less demanding features
(32 kilo-samples per second).
- Protection and Control Equipment, PCE, protecting the two DRs of the MS against surges,
- a personal computer with multiple processing capacity through one or several multiprocessing
units.
- a portable computer for controlling the measurement system remotely.
Sub-system for generating a high alternating voltage of 50 Hz applied to the new method
for the measurement and analysis of PDs.
[0071] The system for generating a high alternating voltage of 50 Hz of the present invention
subjects the equipment or installation to be tested to the test voltage only for short
time periods in which the PD signals are captured (block 1.1 of the flow chart of
Figure 1). After each time interval for generating the high test voltage, the output
voltage of the generator is reduced to a low enough value so that the power dissipated
by the generator is negligible (waiting state), and the heat generated in the prior
operation condition can be dissipated. The ratio, r, between the waiting time interval
in relation to the time period for generating the high test voltage is established
with a specific ratio compatible with the technology of the high voltage transformer
used, for example, a maximum ratio of 5:1 could reasonably correspond to 10 seconds
of high voltage generated with 50 seconds of waiting state per each time minute, so
that the equivalent thermal load in the operation steady state is much lower than
that required when operating at the test voltage.
[0072] In each test period t
t in which the high test voltage is generated, the test current, I
t required by the equipment or installation to be tested, is supplied by the generator
causing a thermal load. The current I
e during the waiting period t
e is reduced to a percentage p in relation to the current during the test. The comparison
between the thermal load in this pulsed state in relation to the thermal load in continuous
operating steady state of a permanent nominal current generator I
p meets the following equation:

[0073] Where it results that

[0074] By way of example, if the ratio r=t
e/t
t = 5 and the percentage of current in waiting condition is 25% in relation to the
test current (p=0.25), it results that with one generator of the steady state nominal
power having half the value of that required at the test voltage would be sufficient
under the thermal load viewpoint.
[0075] By way of example, a test installation having a steady state nominal power of 250
kVA can be used in the indicated pulsed state (r=5 and p=0.25) to supply test powers
of up to 500 kVA, without being heated above the nominal value.
[0076] During the period of generating high voltage, for example 10 seconds in a minute,
at least, one time interval (for example 2 seconds), the high PD measurement voltage
will be reached so that immediately during the waiting operation period of the generator,
for example 50 seconds, the measurement system has enough time to perform the numerical
processing of the signals, corresponding to filtering and determining the parameters
representative of each PD-type pulse (blocks 1.2 to 1.6 of the flow chart of Figure
1). The high test voltage will then be generated again to perform a new capture, and
the process will be repeated as many times necessary (blocks 1.6 and 1.1 of the flow
chart of Figure 1). The number of times that the capture and analysis process is repeated
must be enough so as to provide statistically reliable data. It is known that with
a number of captures corresponding to 250 periods of the test voltage wave (for example
20 ms for 50 Hz) sufficient data is available for reliably performing the analysis
corresponding to the tenth, eleventh and twelfth stages of the flow chart of Figure
1. The higher the number of periods captured the more reliable the diagnosis will
be.
[0077] By way of example, if in the time interval for generating a high voltage the time
period reached by the test voltage intended for the PD capture and measurement is
of the order of 2 seconds per each time minute and the process is repeated five consecutive
times (5 minutes of testing), then twice the amount of test sinusoidal wave periods
established as necessary (500 periods of data) will be available for performing the
diagnosis of the insulation condition of the equipment or of the installation. Accordingly,
in 5 minutes of testing it is possible to perform a reliable diagnosis with a voltage
having the same frequency as the grid.
[0078] Additionally, considering that the duration of the test does not require exceeding
a tenth of minutes and that no other test will be performed until after an hour has
elapsed, the nominal power of the generator in steady state in relation to the maximum
power delivered can be further reduced. The use of step-up transformers having lower
power provides the fundamental advantage of a considerable weight reduction.
[0079] For the purpose of not having to supply more than the active power of losses, the
reactive power required during the test is compensated by means of FACT-type power
electronics, the weight of which is also reduced. Vector control of the FACT is performed
with a reduced number of switching pulses to limit the interfering signal content
during partial discharge measurement due to the switching of the electronic power
switches at the same time of complying with the condition that the difference between
the effective value of the generated voltage and the crest value divided by the square
root of 2 does not exceed 15%. The combined use of a three-phase step-up power transformer
and three-phase FACT for testing balanced tri-phase loads allows substantially reducing
the use of traditional reactive compensation elements (reactors and condensers), the
weight and volume of which have traditionally been a serious drawback. Additionally,
the simultaneous test of the three phases provides the substantial advantage of reducing
the test time.
[0080] The circuit of the test generation system is made up of the following elements:
- a low voltage automatic switch for the connection, disconnection and protection,
- a autotransformer that is adjustable by means of monitoring low voltage, provided
for providing the active power required in the test,
- a servomotor to adjust the output voltage of the autotransformer controlled by a computer
for the purpose of coordinating the time periods in which the high test voltages are
generated with the waiting periods, used for capturing, recording and analysing the
signals coming from the PD sensors,
- a three-phase FACT for compensating the reactive power required in the test,
- a three-phase power transformer to increase the voltage from a low voltage to the
test voltage.
1. A method for real time tests and diagnosis of the sources of partial discharges produced
in high voltage equipment and installations, which are in service or out of service,
by means of discriminating background noise, identifying the position of the PDs,
distinguishing between different sources of PDs located in a single position, determining,
for each source of PD, its magnitude, rate of repetition and type of associated fault,
characterized in that it comprises:
- synchronised capturing and digitising (block 1.1) of the analogue signals collected
by two partial discharge sensors located at the ends of the installation to be diagnosed
together with the analogue signals collected from two voltage sensors, one for sensing
the test voltage and the other one for sensing the grid voltage, all the captures
starting in the instant that the UTC (Universal Time Coordinated) coincides with exact
seconds, being supported for such purpose on, for example, the PPS signal (pulse per
second) delivered by a GPS receiver, and each capture covering one or more complete
periods of the test voltage wave (at least 20 milliseconds for 50 Hz);
- segmenting (block 1.2) the sensed and digitalised signal in time intervals equal
to the periods of the sine wave test voltage signal.
- real time discriminating (block 1.3), through the use of multiprocessors, within
the signal measured by each PD sensor captured (block 1.1), between electric noise
and the partial discharge-type (PD) signal by means of applying the Wavelet transform
together with a statistical treatment of the measured signal;
- determining (block 1.4) for each PD-type signal, the time instant, ti, in which it occurs on the absolute UTC time reference, associated with the phase
difference of the PD-type signal in relation to the zero-crossing of the test voltage
wave, φi, and in relation to the zero-crossing of the grid voltage wave, φri, in the event that the latter is different from the test voltage; as well as the
real time determination, through the use of multiprocessors, for each i-th PD-type
signal, of the parameters of the mathematical function derived from the hyperbolic
secant containing two parameters αi and βi making it asymmetrical

achieving the best fit with the envelope of the damped oscillating event characterising
the PD-type signal and extracting from this function the two parameters representative
of the shape of the envelope, in relation to the rise time and fall time, which are
associated with the two coefficients αi and βi of the denominator of the asymmetrical hyperbolic secant function; together with
the real time determination, through the use of multiprocessors, for each PD-type
signal, of the parameters of the sinusoidal mathematical function

which best fits with the damped oscillating event and characterises the PD-type signal;
extracting from this function the parameter of the fundamental frequency fí=ωí/2π as an additional parameter representative of its shape;
- storing (block 1.5) the calculated parameters characteristic of each partial discharge
pulse determined in block (1.3).
- repeating (block 1.6) the stages associated with blocks (1.2) to (1.5) for each
period interval of the test voltage (20 ms for 50 Hz and 16.66 ms for 60 Hz) of the
global period of the captured PD signal (block 1.1).
- repeating new captures (block 1.7) for the purpose of again applying the preceding
stages associated with blocks (1.2) to (1.6) enough times to enable having statistically
sufficient data for reliably determining the position of sources of the partial discharges,
the number of different sources of partial discharge located in each position and
the parameters representative of each source of PD, which correspond to the magnitude
of the discharge, the rate of repetition of PD pulses and the phase resolved patterns
of the test voltage and of the grid voltage; the number of acquisitions considered
sufficient for the mentioned calculation is 250 periods of the grid voltage wave;
- excluding (block 1.8) PDs originating in the grid voltage far from the element under
testing when the grid voltage is different from the test voltage by means of representing
the magnitude of the phase resolved discharge of the grid voltage (j)ri);
- correlating (block 1.9) the parameters of each PD signal measured with the two measurement
systems to enable determining the position of sources of PDs by using the absolute
time reference obtained in the stage associated with block (1.4);
- determining (block 1.10) the position map of sources of PDs taking into account
the delay in arrival to each sensor of the PD pulses measured with a different measurement
system and paired by proximity, xi (Δti), taking into account the maximum time delay possible between the PD pulses received
by the two measurement systems, the ratio between the maximum length to be travelled
by the PD pulse and the propagation speed of the PD pulse;
- identifying (block 1.11) the different number of sources of PD for each position
of sources of PDs through the formation of groups of PD signals having similar values
of the three following parameters: the two parameters representative of the shape
of the envelope of the PD-type signal (block 1.4), related to the rise time and the
fall time αi and βi and the parameter of the fundamental frequency fi of the damped oscillation pulse characteristic of the PD signal;
- determining (block 1.12) for each source of PD the value representative of the magnitude
of the discharge, of the rate of repetition of PD pulses associated with each acquisition
second, as well as the phase resolved pattern of the PD pulses of the test voltage
wave, correlating it in relation to typical fault reference patterns, for example
by means of a neural network structure trained in known typical fault patterns;
- storing (block 1.13) the parameters determined in blocks (1.10), (1.11) and (1.2);
- repeating the process (block 1.14) for determining parameters calculated in block
(1.12) for each source of PD
- repeating the process (1.15) indicated in blocks (1.11) to (1.14) for the sources
of PDs associated with each position of PDs.
- graphically representing (block 1.16) the results of the stages associated with
blocks (1.10), (1.11) and (1.12), corresponding to the position map of PDs where the
sources of PDs are located (block 1.10), groups of different sources of PDs located
in each position (block 1.11), results of the parameters obtained for each source
of PD (block 1.12) corresponding to the magnitude of the discharge, the rate of repetition,
the phase resolved patterns of PDs of the test voltage and the result of the type
of fault associated with each source of PD of the network.
2. The method according to the method of claim 1, corresponding to the stage of the noise
discrimination block (1.3) which allows real time distinction of signals with a transient
waveform characteristic from a PD of other signals characteristic of electric background
noise superimposed by using multiprocessors working in parallel.
3. The method according to the method of claim 1, corresponding to the stage associated
with block (1.4) relating to the real time determination, through the use of multiprocessors,
of the parameters of the mathematical function referred to as asymmetrical hyperbolic
secant

which best fits with the envelope of the damped oscillating event characterising each
PD-type signal sensed in the stage associated with block (1.1)
and of the parameters of the sinusoidal function

which best fits with the frequency and phase difference of the damped oscillating
event characterising each PD-type signal sensed in the stage associated with block
(1.1), extracting from the first function the two parameters representative of the
shape of the envelope, in relation to the rise time and fall time, which correspond
to the two coefficients α
i and β
i of the exponentials of the denominator of the asymmetrical hyperbolic secant function
and extracting from the second function the parameter of the fundamental frequency
f
i =ω
i/2
π as an additional parameter representative of its shape.
4. The method according to the method of claim 1, corresponding to the stage associated
with block (1.8) relating to the exclusion of PDs originated by the grid voltage,
far from the element or installation under testing when the test voltage is different
from the grid voltage, through the representation of the magnitudes of the phase resolved
partial discharges of the grid voltage (φi) determined in the stage associated with block (1.4).
5. The method according to the method of claim 1, corresponding to the stage associated
with block (1.11) relating to the identification of the different number of sources
of PDs, through the formation of groups of PD signals having similar values of the
three following parameters: the two parameters representative of the shape of the
envelope of the PD-type signal related to the rise time and the fall time αi, βi and the parameter of the fundamental frequency, fi, of the damped oscillation pulse characteristic of the PD signal, all of which are
mentioned in claim 3.
6. The method according to the method of claim 1, corresponding to the stage associated
with block (1.16) relating to the graphic representation of the results of the analysis,
stages corresponding to the blocks (1.10), (1.11), (1.12) relating to the position
map of PDs where the sources of PDs are located (block 1.10), the grouping of the
different sources of PDs located in each position (block 1.11) and the results obtained
from each source of PD (1.12): magnitude of the discharge, rate of repetition, phase
resolved pattern of the voltage for each source of PD and result of the type of fault
associated with each source of PD.
7. A physical system for detecting partial discharge-type (PD) signals based on the method
of claim 1 which allows taking simultaneous and synchronised measurements in two measurement
systems for measuring PDs, discriminating the noise in relation to the transient waveform
characteristic of the PD signals according to the method of claim 2, determining the
parameters associated with each PD according to the method of claim 3, determining
the map of sources of PDs along the length of the cable according to the stage associated
with block (1.10) in claim 1, graphically representing the groups of the sources of
PDs according to the method of claim 5, graphically representing the results of the
analysis according to the method of claim 6, made up of two independent measurement
systems each having the following elements:
- a partial discharge sensor;
- a voltage sensor for measuring the test voltage waveform;
- a voltage sensor for measuring the grid voltage waveform in the event that it is
different from the test voltage;
- a card for receiving the UTC time signal, for example from a GPS system, and another
one for synchronised trigger pulse generation (TPG);
- a digital recorder triggered by the synchronisation pulse coming from the synchronised
trigger pulse card;
- a protection and control equipment, protecting the two digital recorders of the
measurement system against surges;
- a personal computer with multiple processing capacity through one or several multiprocessing
units;
- a portable computer for remotely controlling the measurement system.
8. A physical system for generating alternating high voltages of the frequency of the
supply voltage (50 Hz or 60 Hz) generating the test voltage during short time periods,
in which the PD signals are captured according to the stage associated with block
(1.1) of claim 1; after which the voltage is reduced, for a considerably longer wait
time period, to a low enough value to allow the dissipation of the heat produced in
the instants of generating alternating high voltage for testing, using each reduced
voltage period for analysing the measurements relating to the stages associated with
blocks (1.2) to (1.7) of claim 1 and thus being able to supply a pulsed state power
that is much greater than the steady-state nominal power of the generator, while at
the same time the reactive power required in the test is compensated by means of FACT-type
power electronics for the purpose of limiting the use of reactors and condensers for
compensating the reactive power required in the test.