[Technical Field]
[0001] The present invention relates to a titanium alloy, particularly to a titanium alloy
having high corrosion resistance (crevice corrosion resistance, acid resistance, and
the like in a bromine-ion-containing environment) and high economic efficiency.
[Background Art]
[0002] Titanium is being actively used in the aircraft field and the like, utilizing its
feature of lightness and strength. Further, having high corrosion resistance, titanium
is beginning to be used in wide range of fields as a material for chemical industry
equipment, a material for thermal and nuclear power generation equipment, and a material
for seawater desalination equipment, and the like.
[0003] However, the environment in which titanium can exhibit its high corrosion resistance
is limited to oxidizing acid (nitric acid) environment and neutral chloride environment
such as seawater. Titanium does not have sufficient crevice corrosion resistance in
a high-temperature chloride environment, nor sufficient corrosion resistance in a
non-oxidizing acid solution such as hydrochloric acid (hereinafter, the crevice corrosion
resistance and the corrosion resistance are simply referred to as "corrosion resistance"
unless otherwise specified). In order to solve this problem, a titanium alloy in which
titanium contains a platinum group element (hereinafter referred to as "platinum-group-element-containing
titanium alloy") is proposed and normalized to be used in various usages.
[0004] Specifically, in the alkali industry field, an anode electrode used for electrolysis
is used in a high-concentration, 20% to 30% brine containing hydrochloric acid at
a high temperature of 100°C or more. In this anode electrode, a platinum-group-element-containing
titanium alloy is used for a part where crevice corrosion may occur.
[0005] In the Ni refining industry field, a reaction vessel is subjected to a high-concentration
sulfuric acid including slurry at a high temperature, which is higher than 100°C.
The reaction vessel is made of a platinum-group-element-containing titanium alloy.
[0006] In the heat exchanger field, a heat exchanger tube used in the salt manufacture field
is subjected to high-temperature and high-concentration salt water, and a heat exchanger
tube used for heat exchange of an exhaust gas of a furnace is subjected to an exhaust
gas containing chorine, NO
x, and SO
x. These heat exchanger tubes are made of a platinum-group-element-containing titanium
alloy.
[0007] In the petrochemical industry field, a reaction vessel or the like of desulfurization
equipment used at a time of oil refining is subjected to high-temperature hydrogen
sulfide. Such a reaction vessel is made of a platinum-group-element-containing titanium
alloy.
[0008] Further, a platinum-group-element-containing titanium alloy is considered to be applied
to a separator material for a fuel cell, utilizing its high corrosion resistance.
[0009] Gr. 7 ("Gr." (Grade) complies with the ASTM standard. The same holds true in the
following description.), which is a Ti-0.15 Pd alloy, is a titanium alloy that has
been developed to have corrosion resistance in the above described usages. Pd contained
in this titanium alloy reduces hydrogen overvoltage to maintain a natural potential
within a passivation area. That is, Pd eluted from the alloy by corrosion is precipitated
again on the surface of the alloy to be deposited, and thereby the hydrogen overvoltage
of the alloy is reduced and the natural potential is maintained within the passivation
area. Accordingly, this alloy has high corrosion resistance.
[0011] In order to solve this problem, as disclosed in Patent Document 1 below, a titanium
alloy (Gr. 17) having a lower content of Pd, which is 0.03 to 0.1 mass%, than Gr.
7, and also having high crevice corrosion resistance is proposed and put into practical
use.
[0012] Patent Document 2 below discloses, as a titanium alloy that can be manufactured at
low cost while preventing a reduction in corrosion resistance, a titanium alloy containing
one or more platinum group elements in 0.01 to 0.12 mass% in total, and one or more
of Al, Cr, Zr, Nb, Si, Sn, and Mn in 5 mass% or less in total. In a usage at a time
of development of the titanium alloy, sufficient corrosion resistance is obtained
when Pd is in a range of 0.01 to 0.12 mass%. In a usage of recent years, however,
a further increase in characteristics is required, so that the corrosion resistance
has become unsufficient particularly when the content of Pd is less than 0.05 mass%.
Also in the usage at the time of development, a further reduction in cost is required.
[0013] According to Non-Patent Document 1 below, however, by adding Co, Ni, or V, as a
third element, to a Ti-Pd alloy, the crevice corrosion resistance is increased, but
the content of Pd needs to be 0.05 mass% or more in order to obtain sufficient crevice
corrosion resistance.
[0014] As for a reduction in cost, Ru, which is the most inexpensive element in the platinum
group element, has been actively used to develop a material. Patent Document 3 below
discloses a titanium alloy to which 0.005 to 0.2 mass% Ru is added. As shown in an
example in this document, in order to obtain sufficient crevice corrosion resistance,
the addition of Ru to this titanium alloy needs to be 0.05 mass% or more.
[0015] Patent Document 4 below discloses a material of a system in which Ru and Ni are added
in order to further increase corrosion resistance. This material has not only crevice
corrosion resistance, but also high corrosion resistance in an environment containing
non-oxidizing acid such as sulfuric acid or hydrochloric acid. Ti-0.06Ru-0.5Ni is
an alloy having a structure within the range shown in Patent Document 4 below and
is normalized as Gr. 13 to be used practically as a corrosion-resistant titanium alloy.
However, the addition of Ni results in a problem that a Ti
2Ni compound is precipitated in the titanium alloy. Further, due to this compound precipitation,
the processability of the titanium alloy, such as stretch, becomes inferior to that
of Gr. 17.
[0016] In addition to these problems, in some cases in which a Ti-Pd alloy is applied to
a usage as an anode for electrolysis and an inexpensive raw material (brine) is used,
crevice corrosion has occurred by bromine (bromine ions) contained in the raw material,
although crevice corrosion has been considered not to occur in a case of using normal
brine. In addition, corrosion due to bromine (bromine ions) has sometimes occurred
also in a chemical plant, for example. Accordingly, a titanium alloy having high corrosion
resistance even in a bromine-ion-containing environment has been demanded.
[0017] Patent Document 5 and Patent Document 6 disclose materials to which a platinum group
element, a rare earth element, and a transition element are added. Each of these materials
is, however, a titanium alloy for an ultra-high vacuum vessel. In Patent Document
5 and Patent Document 6, the platinum group element and the rare earth element are
added in order to obtain an effect of preventing a phenomenon in which a gas component
dissolved in a material is dispersed and released to a vacuum in the ultra-high vacuum.
It is known that the platinum group element has a function of trapping hydrogen and
that the rare earth element has a function of trapping oxygen in the titanium alloy.
Further, in Patent Document 5 and Patent Document 6, in addition to the platinum group
element and the rare earth element, a transition element such as Co, Fe, Cr, Ni, Mn,
or Cu is given as a necessary element. It is known that the transition element has
a role of fixing atomic hydrogen that is adsorbed on the surface of the vacuum vessel
by the platinum group element. However, none of Patent Document 5 and Patent Document
6 is made considering corrosion resistance, and refers to corrosion resistance in
a bromine-ion-containing environment.
[Prior Art Document(s)]
[Patent Document(s)]
[Non-Patent Document(s)]
[0019]
[Non-Patent Document 1] Hideaki MIYUKI, and one other, "Low alloy titanium SMI-ACE with high crevice corrosion
resistance", The Society of Materials Science, Japan, Committee on Corrosion and Protection,
September 12, 2001.
[Non-Patent Document 2] Chihiro TAKI, "Characteristics of corrosion-resistant titanium alloy TICOREX and usage
examples thereof", Nippon Steel Cooperation Technical Report, 2011, Vol. 375, pp.
73-77.
[Non-Patent Document 3] Tatsuhiro OKADA, "Pitting potential of titanium in bromide solution", DENKI KAGAKU,
1981, Vol. 49, No. 9, pp. 584-588.
[Summary of the Invention]
[Problem(s) to Be Solved by the Invention]
[0020] The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and aims to provide
a titanium alloy having high corrosion resistance, particularly in a bromine-ion-containing
environment.
[Means for Solving the Problem(s)]
[0021] Further, by obtaining a titanium alloy by adding Ru, which is less expensive than
Pd, instead of adding Pd, which is an expensive platinum group element, the price
of the titanium alloy can be lower than before.
[0022] In order to achieve the above object, the present inventors have studied the following.
- (i) Revealing a mechanism by which corrosion resistance is expressed in a Ti-Pd alloy,
and adding an element that promotes a preferable surface state to increase corrosion
resistance. Increasing corrosion resistance also in a case of a Ti-Ru alloy.
- (ii) Obtaining corrosion resistance that is as high as or higher than before and high
corrosion resistance in a bromine-ion-existing environment by using a platinum group
element at a low content.
[0023] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a mechanism by which corrosion resistances
of a Ti-Pd alloy and a Ti-Pd-Co alloy are expressed. The surface of the Ti-Pd alloy
and the Ti-Pd-Co alloy is active in an initial state before being immersed in a solution.
When being immersed in an acid solution such as boiling hydrochloric acid, Ti and
Pd on the surface, or Ti, Pd, and Co on the surface are melted, and the melted Pd,
or Pd and Co is/are precipitated on the surface to be condensed. Accordingly, the
hydrogen overvoltage of the entire titanium alloy is decreased. Thus, the potential
of the titanium alloy is maintained in a passivation area, and the titanium alloy
has high corrosion resistance.
[0024] The present inventors have studied the Ti-Ru alloy and confirmed that the corrosion
resistance of the Ti-Ru alloy is secured by the same mechanism as in Ti-Pd. However,
when Pd and Ru in the same addition amount are compared with each other under the
same conditions, Pd has a higher effect of increasing corrosion resistance. Therefore,
it is revealed that a greater amount of Ru needs to be added in order to obtain the
same level of corrosion resistance.
[0025] Patent Document 4 and Non-Patent Document 2 above disclose that high corrosion resistance
can be obtained by precipitating a large amount of Ti
2Ni
1-xRu
x (a compound including Ru instead of part of Ni in Ti
2Ni) in a titanium base material by adding Ru and Ni without adding a large amount
of Ru. However, there is a problem that the titanium alloy to which a large amount
of Ni is added has poor processability such as stretch.
[0026] The present inventors have examined for a novel additive element that promotes an
alloy base material to be melted at an initial stage after a Ti-Ru alloy is immersed
in an acid solution in order to enable Ru to be precipitated immediately and uniformly
on a surface to be condensed. It is considered that the addition of such a novel additive
element to the Ti-Ru alloy causes the alloy base material to be melted in the initial
stage in an active state area after being immersed in the acid solution. Accordingly,
the Ru ion concentration is increased in the solution near the surface of the alloy,
and a sufficient amount of Ru is immediately precipitated and condensed on the surface
of the alloy so as to make the alloy have a potential in a passivation area. Hereinafter,
such precipitation of such an amount of Ru on the surface of the alloy is referred
to as "Ru precipitation condensation". Even if the content of Ru is low in the alloy,
when the Ru precipitation condensation occurs, it becomes possible to decrease the
hydrogen overvoltage of the Ti-Ru alloy immediately so as to make the Ti-Ru alloy
have a potential that is more noble and stable (a potential in the passivation area).
[0027] In the Ti-Ru alloy having a low content of Ru, when the alloy base material is immediately
melted in the initial active state by such a novel additive element being added, the
Ru ion concentration and Ti ion concentration near the surface become higher than
in a case in which the additive element is not added. Accordingly, the Ru precipitation
condensation occurs. Thus, it can be considered that the hydrogen overvoltage of the
alloy is immediately decreased and that the potential can be kept in the passivation
area.
[0028] On the other hand, in the Ti-Ru alloy having a high content of Ru and containing
this novel additive element, in a case in which a damage such as a scratch is generated
on the surface of the alloy in a usage environment, the Ru precipitation condensation
propagates more immediately on a fresh surface generated by the damage than in a case
of a conventional titanium alloy. Accordingly, it can be considered that the hydrogen
overvoltage of the alloy reaches the passivation area, and the damage will be repaired.
Therefore, corrosion starting from the damage is unlikely to propagate.
[0029] As shown in Non-Patent Document 3, in a bromine-containing environment, pitting or
crevice corrosion is generated on pure titanium. It has been considered that crevice
corrosion may not occur in a Ti-Pd-based titanium alloy, but crevice corrosion may
sometimes be generated in an environment of a chloride containing bromine ions. The
present inventors have intensively studied this problem, and have found out that the
resistance to corrosion caused by bromine is increased by condensing Ru on the surface.
[0030] On the basis of such assumption and knowledge, the present inventors have performed
experiment to examine for an element that promotes an alloy base material to be melted
in an initial stage after the alloy is immersed in a solution, that is, an element
that promotes Ru precipitation condensation on the Ti-Ru alloy surface (the above
described "novel additive element).
[0031] Accordingly, the present inventors have found out that rare earth elements correspond
to such an element, and that the resistance to corrosion caused by bromine is further
increased by a synergetic effect of adding, in addition to Ru and a rare earth element,
one or more selected from the group consisting of Ni, Co, Mo, Cr, V, and W. Note that
the description is made on the basis of Ru; however, another platinum group element
such as Pd is also considered to increase the resistance to corrosion caused by bromine
in a similar manner.
[0032] The rare earth element itself does not have an effect of increasing corrosion resistance
of an alloy. In this light, the rare earth element has a different function from the
additive element disclosed in each of Patent Documents 2 to 4 and Non-Patent Document
1 above.
[0033] The usage of the alloy and the function of the element in Patent Documents 5 and
6 are different from those in the present invention. That is, the function of the
rare earth element in Patent Documents 5 and 6 are compared with that in the present
invention as below (the content is weight%).
[0034] Patent Documents 5 and 6: The titanium alloy has high solid solubility of oxygen.
The rare earth element is added in order to fix oxygen as an oxide so as to prevent
dissolved oxygen from being dispersed in the alloy and to prevent its release to a
vacuum atmosphere in a gas state when being used in a high vacuum usage. To obtain
this effect, the lower limit of the rare earth element is set to 0.02%. When the added
amount exceeds 0.5%, ductility is decreased by the precipitated oxide. Accordingly,
the upper limit of the rare earth element is set to 0.5%.
[0035] The present invention: When being immersed in an environment of a chloride aqueous
solution, the titanium alloy containing a platinum group element is melted in an active
state area, and the platinum group element is precipitated to be condensed on the
surface, so that the potential of the alloy as a whole is shifted to be in a passivation
area (the potential becomes noble). The rare earth element has a function of shortening
the time for the potential to become noble and a function of increasing the condensing
degree of the platinum group element on the surface. To obtain this effect, the rare
earth element is desirably in a dissolving range of the titanium alloy. The lower
limit is 0.001% and the upper limit is 0.1% in order to obtain this effect. When the
amount exceeds 0.1%, a compound of titanium and the rare earth element is produced,
which may degrade corrosion resistance.
[0036] The role of the rare earth element in Patent Documents 5 and 6 is to react with oxygen
dissolved in the titanium alloy to produce an oxide. In contrast, in the present invention,
the rare earth element has a largely different role of promoting the platinum group
element to be condensed on the surface of the titanium alloy in a wet corrosion environment.
Further, in the present invention, a desirable rare earth element component is within
the dissolving range, which is a content lower than that in Patent Documents 5 and
6.
[0037] The present invention has been made on the basis of this knowledge and provides titanium
alloys as described in (1) to (7) below.
(1)
[0038] A titanium alloy to be used in a bromine-ion-containing environment, the titanium
alloy consisting of, in mass%, a platinum group element: greater than or equal to
0.01% and less than or equal to 0.10%, a rare earth element: greater than or equal
to 0.001% and less than 0.02%, O: greater than or equal to 0% and less than 0.1%,
and the balance: Ti and impurities.
(2)
[0039] The titanium alloy according to (1), wherein the titanium alloy contains, instead
of part of Ti, one or more selected from the group consisting of Ni, Co, Mo, V, Cr,
and W, the content of Ni is less than or equal to 1.0 mass%, the content of Co is
less than or equal to 1.0 mass%, the content of Mo is less than or equal to 0.5 mass%,
the content of V is less than or equal to 0.5 mass%, the content of Cr is less than
or equal to 0.5 mass%, and the content of W is less than or equal to 0.5 mass%.
(3)
[0040] The titanium alloy according to (1) or (2), consisting of, in mass%, the platinum
group element: greater than or equal to 0.01% and less than or equal to 0.05%.
(4)
[0041] The titanium alloy according to any one of (1) to (3), wherein the platinum group
element is Ru.
(5)
[0042] The titanium alloy according to any one of (1) to (4), wherein the rare earth element
is Y.
(6)
[0043] The titanium alloy according to any one of (1) to (5), wherein the content of O is
less than 0.05 mass%.
(7)
[0044] The titanium alloy according to any one of (1) to (6), wherein the titanium alloy
is used in a chemical plant apparatus.
[Effect(s) of the Invention]
[0045] The titanium alloy according to the present invention has high corrosion resistance,
the corrosion resistance particularly in a bromine-ion-containing environment. Further,
in a case of using Ru, which is an inexpensive platinum group element, the raw material
cost of the titanium alloy becomes low. In a case in which the content of the platinum
group element is high (for example, higher than 0.05 mass%), when a damage such as
a removal of a passivation film is generated on the surface by a scratch or the like,
corrosion starting from the damage is unlikely to propagate.
[0046] In a case in which the titanium alloy contains, instead of part of Ti, one or more
selected from the group consisting of Ni, Co, Mo, Cr, V, and W, the resistance to
a high-concentration chloride environment containing bromine is also obtained.
[0047] In a case in which the content of O is less than 0.05 mass%, favorable processability
is obtained.
[0048] Y is inexpensive among rare earth elements. In a case in which Y is contained as
the rare earth element, the raw material cost becomes low.
[Brief Description of the Drawing(s)]
[0049]
[FIG. 1] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a mechanism by which corrosion resistance
of a Ti-Pd(-Co) alloy is expressed.
[FIG. 2] FIG. 2 is schematic diagrams showing a test piece for a crevice corrosion
resistance test, and (a) shows a plan view and (b) shows a side view.
[FIG. 3] FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a state of a test piece used in a crevice
corrosion resistance test (ASTM G78).
[FIG. 4] FIG. 4 is a graph showing a relation between a Y content of a Ti alloy containing
0.02% Pd in Example 2 and a corrosion speed (96 hours average).
[FIG. 5] FIG. 5 is a graph showing a change in a surface Pd concentration after a
boiling hydrochloric acid test of a Ti alloy containing 0.02% Pd in Example 2.
[Mode(s) for Carrying out the Invention]
[0050] As described above, the titanium alloy according to the present invention consists
of, in mass%, a platinum group element: greater than or equal to 0.01% and less than
or equal to 0.10%, a rare earth element: greater than or equal to 0.001% and less
than 0.02%, O: greater than or equal to 0% and less than 0.1%, and the balance: Ti
and impurities. The present invention will be described below in detail.
1. Platinum group element
[0051] Platinum group elements have an effect of decreasing a hydrogen overvoltage of a
titanium alloy and of maintaining a natural potential in a passivation area. Among
the platinum group elements, the titanium alloy according to the present invention
contains Ru, for example. Ru is less expensive than other platinum group elements
and is preferable to secure economic efficiency. The market price of Ru was about
1/6 of that of Pd as of January in 2012.
[0052] According to the present inventors' study, by adding the platinum group element and
the rare earth element to the titanium alloy, an effect of preventing corrosion of
the titanium alloy can be obtained even in a bromine-ion-containing environment, although
the mechanism thereof has not been revealed. In the present invention, the content
of the platinum group element is 0.01 to 0.10 mass%. In a case in which the content
of the platinum group element is less than 0.01 mass%, corrosion resistance of the
titanium alloy may be insufficient and corrosion may occur in a high-temperature and
high-concentration chloride aqueous solution. On the other hand, even if the content
of the platinum group element is higher than 0.10 mass%, an increase in corrosion
resistance is not expected, and in addition, the raw material cost becomes high and
processability becomes poor.
[0053] Considering the balance between processability and corrosion resistance, the content
of the platinum group element having a β-stabilizing function, such as Ru, is preferably
set to 0.01 to 0.05 mass%, for example. This is because the titanium alloy according
to the present invention, in which the content of the platinum group element is in
this range, has corrosion resistance as high as a conventional titanium alloy in which
the content of the platinum group element is higher than 0.05 mass%. Note that, in
a case in which a scratch or the like generates a damage on the titanium alloy, such
as a removal of a passivation film, the Ru precipitation condensation propagates more
immediately on a fresh surface generated by the scratch or the like as the content
of Ru is higher in the titanium alloy, as described above by taking the Ti-Ru alloy
as an example. Accordingly, since a potential of a portion where a scratch or the
like is generated reaches the passivation area immediately and the surface is repaired
(the passivation film is repaired), as the Ru content is higher, corrosion starting
from the damage is more unlikely to occur. In a case in which the Ru content is higher
than 0.05 mass%, the titanium alloy according to the present invention is suitable
for a usage in a harsh environment where a damage can be generated in the passivation
film.
2. Rare earth element
2-1. Reason of containing rare earth element
[0054] The present inventors have considered to add, to a Ti-0.04 mass% Ru alloy, a minute
amount of various elements that are likely to be melted in an environment of a high-temperature
and high-concentration chloride aqueous solution. A titanium alloy containing such
elements was immersed in a chloride aqueous solution to be melted in the active state
area. Then, the present inventors have investigated whether an effect of shifting
the potential of the entire alloy to the passivation area is obtained by promoting
the Ru precipitation condensation on the surface of the titanium alloy. As a result,
rare earth elements are confirmed as elements having this effect.
[0055] A further investigation has revealed that the same effect can be obtained not only
in a case in which the Ru content is 0.04 mass%, but also in a case in which the Ru
content is in a range of 0.01 to 0.05 mass% or greater than 0.05 mass% in the Ru-containing
titanium alloy. That is, it is found out that the addition of the rare earth element
to the titanium alloy, in which the Ru content is in a range of 0.01 to 0.10 mass%,
enables Ti and Ru to be melted immediately after the titanium alloy is subjected to
a corrosion environment. In other words, it is found out that the Ru ion concentration
can be increased (the Ru precipitation condensation can be generated) immediately
in a solution near the surface of the titanium alloy. As compared with a titanium
alloy containing Ru and not containing the rare earth element, the titanium alloy
containing Ru and the rare earth element can efficiently precipitate Ru on the surface.
Even when a melted amount (corrosion amount) of the entire titanium alloy is small,
and the titanium alloy containing Ru and the rare earth element can efficiently precipitate
Ru and has high corrosion resistance. Note that although the description is made on
Ru, another platinum group element such as Pd is similarly considered to have an effect
of increasing the resistance to corrosion caused by bromine.
[0056] Rare earth elements include Sc, Y, light rare earth elements (La to Eu), and heavy
rare earth elements (Gd to Lu). According to the present inventors' study, any of
the rare earth elements has the above described effect. Further, it is not necessary
to add only one element as the rare earth element. The above described effect has
been confirmed also in a case of using a mixture or compound of rear earth elements,
such as a mixture of rare earth elements (also referred to as mischmetal or "Mm" below)
before separation purification or a didymium alloy (alloy including Nd and Pr).
[0057] Considering the above description, in terms of economic efficiency, it is preferable
to use La, Ce, Nd, Pr, Sm, Mm, a didymium alloy, Y (Y is particularly preferable),
which are easily obtained and relatively inexpensive among rare earth elements. Any
Mm and didymium alloy that are commercially available can be used for the present
invention regardless of the component ratio of rare earth element(s).
2-2. Content of rare earth element(s)
[0058] The range of the content of the rare earth element(s) in the titanium alloy according
to the present invention is greater than or equal to 0.001 and less than 0.02 mass%.
When the content of the rare earth element(s) is 0.001 mass% or more, in a passivation
area of a Ti- alloy, it is possible to melt Ti, the platinum group element, and the
rare earth element(s) simultaneously in a chloride aqueous solution, and to obtain
a sufficient effect of promoting the precipitation of the platinum group element on
the surface of the alloy.
[0059] The upper limit of the content of the rare earth element(s) is set to less than 0.02
mass% because the content of the rare earth element(s) being more than this limit
does not increase the above effect, and in addition, a compound that is not produced
in a case of not adding the rare earth element(s) may be produced in the Ti alloy.
This compound is melted preferentially in a chloride aqueous solution, and generates
pit-like corrosion in the Ti-platinum group element. Accordingly, the Ti-platinum
group element alloy in which this compound is produced has lower corrosion resistance
than in a case of not adding the rare earth element(s).
[0060] The content of the rare earth element(s) in the Ti-platinum group element alloy is
preferably set to the solid solubility limit or less in α-Ti, the solid solubility
limit being shown in a phase diagram or the like. For example, the solid solubility
limit of Y in α-Ti is 0.02 mass% (0.01 at%). Accordingly, it is preferable that the
content of Y is less than 0.02 mass% in a case of adding Y. Further, the solid solubility
of La in α-Ti is extremely high, which is 2.84 mass% (1 at%) according to Non-Patent
Document 4 above. However, also in a case of adding La, in view of securing economic
efficiency, the content of La is set to less than 0.02 mass%.
3. O (oxygen)
[0061] The titanium alloy according to the present invention contains O in less than 0.1
mass%. The content of O is set to less than 0.1 mass% because corrosion resistance
and favorable processability are secured. Ti has high solid solubility of oxygen,
so that Ti having high solid solubility of oxygen (JIS type-2 to type-4 titanium)
is intentionally used for a usage for which high strength is required. Indeed the
solid solution of oxygen is effective in increasing the strength, but it may degrade
processability. Accordingly, considering processability in addition to corrosion resistance
and economic efficiently, the upper limit of the content of O is set to 0.1 mass%.
For a usage that does not need high strength or a usage that puts much value on processability,
the content of O is preferably set to less than 0.05 mass%.
4. Ni, Co, Mo, V, Cr, and W
[0062] The titanium alloy according to the present invention may contain, instead of part
of Ti, one or more of Ni, Co, Mo, V, Cr, and W. In this case, in combination with
the effects of the platinum group element and the rare earth element(s), the titanium
alloy can have higher corrosion resistance in a bromine-ion-containing environment.
[0063] In a case of the titanium alloy containing one or more of these elements, the contents
thereof are as follows: Ni: 1.0 mass% or less, Co: 1.0 mass% or less, Mo: 0.5 mass%
or less, V: 0.5 mass% or less, Cr: 0.5 mass% or less, and W: 0.5 mass% or less.
5. Impurities
[0064] Examples of impurities in the titanium alloy include Fe, O, C, H, N, Al, Zr, Nb,
Si, Sn, Mn, and Cu. Fe, O, C, H, and N are mixed from a raw material, a melting electrode,
and an environment, and Al, Zr, Nb, Si, Sn, Mn, and Cu are mixed in a case of using
scrap as a raw material. These impurities may be mixed without any problem as long
as the amount thereof is as small as not to impede the effects of the present invention
seriously. Specifically, the amounts of the impurities being as small as not to impede
the effects of the present invention seriously are as follows: Fe: 0.3 mass% or less,
O: less than 0.1 mass%, C: 0.18 mass% or less, H: 0.015 mass% or less, N: 0.03 mass%
or less, Al: 0.3 mass% or less, Zr: 0.2 mass% or less, Nb: 0.2 mass% or less, Si:
0.02 mass% or less, Sn: 0.2 mass% or less, Mn: 0.01 mass% or less, and Cu: 0.1 mass%
or less. The total amount of these elements is 0.6 mass% or less.
[Example 1]
[0065] To confirm crevice corrosion resistance and processability (bendability and stretch)
of the titanium alloy according to the present invention, the following tests were
performed and the results were evaluated.
1. Test methods
1-1. Samples
[0066] Table 1 shows samples that were used for the tests and composition thereof (analytical
values are shown for elements other than Ti, and Ti is the balance (bal.)).
[Table 1]
|
Sample number |
Pd |
Ru |
Ni |
Cr |
Co |
Mo |
W |
V |
O |
C |
H |
N |
Fe |
Y |
La+Ce+Nd+Pr |
Ti |
(Mm) |
Comparative material 1 |
1 |
0.14 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.109 |
0.006 |
0.0018 |
0.0077 |
0.073 |
- |
- |
Bal. |
Comparative material 2 |
2 |
0.06 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.07 |
0.006 |
0.0042 |
0.005 |
0.036 |
- |
- |
Bal. |
Comparative material 3 |
3 |
- |
0.054 |
0.52 |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.04 |
0.004 |
0.001 |
0.003 |
0.03 |
- |
- |
Bal. |
Comparative material 4 |
4 |
- |
0.052 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.06 |
0.006 |
0.0022 |
0.005 |
0.04 |
- |
- |
Bal. |
Present invention example 1 (claim 1) |
5 |
- |
0.042 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.04 |
0.005 |
0.0021 |
0.006 |
0.03 |
0.005 |
- |
Bal. |
Present invention example 2 (claim 1) |
6 |
- |
0.049 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.08 |
0.006 |
0.0032 |
0.004 |
0.03 |
0.004 |
- |
Bal. |
Present invention example 3 (claim 1) |
7 |
- |
0.087 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.04 |
0.005 |
0.0022 |
0.006 |
0.04 |
- |
0.01 |
Bal. |
Present invention example 4 (claim 1) |
8 |
- |
0.013 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.04 |
0.007 |
0.0028 |
0.006 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
- |
Bal. |
Example beyond invention range 1 |
9 |
- |
0.048 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.12* |
0.007 |
0.0033 |
0.004 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
- |
Bal. |
Example beyond invention range 2 |
10 |
- |
0.004* |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.04 |
0.006 |
0.0034 |
0.006 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
- |
Bal. |
Example beyond invention range 3 |
11 |
- |
0.043 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.04 |
0.007 |
0.0044 |
0.005 |
0.04 |
- |
0.12* |
Bal. |
Present invention example 5 (claim 2) |
12 |
- |
0.025 |
0.12 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.03 |
0.008 |
0.002 |
0.005 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
- |
Bal. |
Present invention example 6 (claim 2) |
13 |
- |
0.027 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.18 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.04 |
0.007 |
0.003 |
0.006 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
- |
Bal. |
Present invention example 7 (claim 2) |
14 |
- |
0.028 |
<0.01 |
0.18 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.04 |
0.008 |
0.003 |
0.006 |
0.04 |
- |
0.01 |
Bal. |
Present invention example 8 (claim 2) |
15 |
- |
0.029 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.11 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.03 |
0.006 |
0.004 |
0.005 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
- |
Bal. |
Present invention example 9 (claim 2) |
16 |
- |
0.028 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.14 |
<0.01 |
0.04 |
0.006 |
0.005 |
0.006 |
0.03 |
0.015 |
- |
Bal. |
Present invention example 10 (claim 2) |
17 |
- |
0.027 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.19 |
0.03 |
0.007 |
0.004 |
0.005 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
- |
Bal. |
Present invention example 11 (claim 2) |
18 |
- |
0.029 |
<0.01 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.006 |
0.003 |
0.004 |
0.03 |
0.015 |
- |
Bal. |
In sample numbers 9 to 11, numerical values with * means being beyond the range of
the present invention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[0067] The following titanium alloy sheet materials were prepared as the samples used for
tests: Comparative materials which are conventional materials (sample numbers 1 to
4); Present invention examples (sample numbers 5 to 8 each corresponding to claim
1, and sample numbers 12 to 18 each corresponding to claim 2); Examples beyond the
range of the present invention, which are not conventional materials (hereinafter
simply referred to as "Examples beyond invention range", sample numbers 9 to 12).
Comparative materials 1 to 3 were obtained from the market, and the other samples
(including Comparative material 4) were fabricated in a laboratory. Comparative material
4 was obtained by employing the composition of the Ti-Ru alloy disclosed in Patent
Document 3 above, which is described as "having high crevice corrosion resistance
and bendability".
1-1-1. Compositions of samples
[0068] Comparative material 1 is Gr. 7, Comparative material 2 is Gr. 17, and Comparative
material 3 is Gr. 13. Each of Comparative materials 1 to 4 is an alloy that does not
contain a rare earth element.
[0069] The samples as Present invention examples and Examples beyond invention range have
the following characteristics.
[0070] Present invention example 1, 4: the Ru content is less than 0.05 mass% and the oxygen
content is less than 0.05 mass%.
[0071] Present invention example 2: the Ru content is less than 0.05 mass% and the oxygen
content is 0.05 mass% or more.
[0072] Present invention example 3: the Ru content is 0.05 mass% or more and the oxygen
content is less than 0.05 mass%.
[0073] Present invention example 5: containing Ni.
[0074] Present invention example 6: containing Co.
[0075] Present invention example 7: containing Cr.
[0076] Present invention example 8: containing Mo.
[0077] Present invention example 9: containing W.
[0078] Present invention example 10: containing V.
[0079] Present invention example 11: containing Cr, Co, Mo, W, and V.
[0080] In Present invention examples 1 to 11, the content of the rare earth element(s) is
less than 0.02 %.
[0081] Example beyond invention range 1: being beyond the range of the present invention
in that the O content exceeds 0.10 mass%.
[0082] Example beyond invention range 2: being beyond the range of the present invention
in that the Ru content is less than 0.01 mass%.
[0083] Example beyond invention range 3: being beyond the range of the present invention
in that the content of the rare earth element(s) is 0.02 mass% or more.
1-1-2. Raw materials used for fabrication of samples
[0084] Raw materials used for the fabrication of the titanium alloys were commercially available
pure Ti sponge (JIS type-1) for industrial use, ruthenium (Ru) powder (purity 99.9
mass%) produced by Kishida chemical Co., Ltd., turning yttrium (Y) (purity 99.9 mass%)
produced by Kishida chemical Co., Ltd., and a massive form Mm (mixed rare earth elements).
The ratio of rare earth elements in Mm was as follows: La: 28.6 mass%, Ce: 48.8 mass%,
Pr: 6.4 mass%, and Nd: 16.2 mass%.
1-1-3. Method for fabricating samples
[0085] The raw materials were measured to be in the predetermined ratio for each sample
to be fabricated, and were melted (molten) in an argon atmosphere by an arc melting
furnace to fabricate five ingots (each of which weighs 80 g). Then, all the five ingots
were re-melted together to fabricate square ingots each having a thickness of 15 mm.
Each of the square ingots was re-melted for homogenization to fabricate square ingots
each having a thickness of 15 mm again. That is, melting was performed three times
in total.
[0086] Since each square ingot contained a minute amount of Pd and rare earth element(s),
in order to reduce segregation of the elements and homogenize the elements in the
alloy, heat treatment was performed under the following conditions.
Atmosphere: vacuum (< 10
-3 Torr)
Temperature: 1100 °C
Time: 24 hours
[0087] The square ingot subjected to heat treatment was rolled under the following conditions
to obtain a sheet material having a thickness of 2.5 mm.
β-phase region hot rolling: rolling was performed with a heating temperature of 1000
°C to reduce the thickness from 15 mm to 9 mm.
α+β-phase region hot rolling: rolling was performed on the sheet material, subjected
to the β-phase region hot rolling, with a heating temperature of 875 °C to reduce
the thickness from 9 mm to 2.5 mm.
[0088] The sheet material obtained by rolling was annealed in vacuum at 750 °C for 30 minutes
to remove strain.
[0089] From the thus obtained hot-rolled sheet, test pieces to be used for the following
tests were obtained by machining.
1-2. Crevice corrosion resistance tests
[0090] Crevice corrosion resistance tests were performed by using the thus obtained test
pieces.
1-2-1. Test pieces for crevice corrosion resistance tests
[0091] FIG. 2 is schematic diagrams showing a test piece for a crevice corrosion resistance
tests, and (a) shows a plan view and (b) shows a side view. As shown in the figures,
this test piece haf a thickness of 2 mm, a width of 30 mm, and a length of 30 mm.
A hole having a diameter of 7 mm was formed in the center of the test piece. Further,
on one surface (front surface) of the test piece was polished using an emery paper
with a grit of 600.
[0092] FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a state of a test piece used in a crevice
corrosion resistance test. A test piece 1 was interposed between clevises (spacers)
2 formed of poly-trifluoroethylene. A hole was formed in the center of each of the
clevises so as to correspond to the hole in the test piece 1. On one surface of the
clevis 2, a plurality of trenches were formed, and the surface including the trenches
were made to be in contact with the test piece 1. The trench formed a crevice between
the test piece 1 and the clevis 2.
[0093] A bolt 3 was inserted into the hole of the test piece 1 and the clevis 2, and a nut
4 was attached to the bolt 3, so that the test piece 1 and the clevises 2 were tightened.
The bolt 3 and the nut 4 were obtained by oxidizing the surface of a bolt and a nut
which were made of pure titanium, by heat treatment in air. The torque at the time
of tightening was 40 kgf · cm.
1-2-2. Crevice corrosion resistance tests in environment not containing bromine ions
substantially
[0094] By use of the test piece in the above state shown in FIG. 3, crevice corrosion resistance
tests based on a multi-clevis test regulated in ASTM G78 were performed. Specifically,
the test piece was immersed in a 250 g/L NaCl aqueous solution (pH = 2, pH was adjusted
by hydrochloric acid), and the test was performed in a manner that the aqueous solution
maintained an air-saturated liquid state at 150 °C by using an autoclave apparatus.
The test time was 500 hours.
[0095] After the test, the number of portions in which crevice corrosion occurred in the
test piece was counted, and an increase or decrease in the weight of the test piece
due to the test (the value obtained by subtracting the weight of the test piece before
the test from the weight of the test piece after the test) was measured. The weight
per test piece before the test was about 7 g.
1-2-3. Crevice corrosion resistance tests in bromine-ion-containing environment
[0096] The same tests and evaluation were performed as in "Crevice corrosion resistance
tests in environment not containing bromine ions substantially" except that, instead
of the NaCl aqueous solution used in the above "Crevice corrosion resistance tests
in environment not containing bromine ions substantially", an aqueous solution obtained
by adding sodium bromide reagent to set the bromine ion concentration to 0.01 mol/L
was used for corrosion tests.
1-3. Evaluation of processability
[0097] The processability of a material was evaluated by bending tests and tension tests.
The test conditions were as follows.
1-3-1. Bending tests
[0098] The test piece was obtained in the following manner. A sheet material having a thickness
of 2.0 mm to 2.5 mm was extended to a thickness of 0.5 mm by rolling and then was
annealed. From this sheet material, a fragment having a size and a shape which are
based on JIS Z 2204 (a width of 20 mm and a length of 60 mm) was cut out, and a surface
of the fragment was polished by an emery paper with a grit of 600 in the rolling direction
and the perpendicular direction.
[0099] The bending tests were performed by a method based on JIS Z 2248, and T-direction
adhesion bendability was evaluated.
1-3-2. Tension tests
[0100] From each of the test pieces 1 for the above crevice corrosion resistance tests,
which were not used in the crevice corrosion resistance tests, two test pieces each
having half the size of ASTM with a thickness of 2 mm were cut out in a direction
parallel to the rolling longitudinal direction. The cut out test pieces were subjected
to tension tests by using an autograph tension tester manufactured by Shimadzu Cooperation.
The tension rate was 0.5%/min up to the bearing force, and was 5 mm/min thereafter.
An average value of breaking extension measured for the two test pieces was set as
a stretch of that test piece in an L direction.
2. Test results
2-1. Crevice corrosion resistance
[0101] Table 2 shows results of the crevice corrosion resistance tests. In Table 2, results
of the crevice corrosion resistance tests in an environment not containing bromine
ions substantially are shown in cells with "250 g/L-NaCl, pH = 2, 150°C". Results
of the crevice corrosion resistance tests in a bromine-ion-containing environment
are shown in cells with "250 g/L - NaCl, Br 0.01 mol/L, pH = 2, 150°C".
[Table 2]
|
Sample number |
250 g/L-NaCl, pH = 2, 150°C |
250 g/L-NaCl, Br 0.01 mol/L, pH = 2, 150°C |
Corrosion occurrence rate |
Increase/ decrease in weight |
Note |
Corrosion occurrence rate |
Increase/ decrease in weight |
Note |
Comparative material 1 |
1 |
0/40 |
3.5mg increase |
No corrosion |
2/40 |
36mg decrease |
Crevice corrosion |
Comparative material 2 |
2 |
0/40 |
2.4mg increase |
No corrosion |
2/40 |
41mg decrease |
Crevice corrosion |
Comparative material 3 |
3 |
0/40 |
2.6mg increase |
No corrosion |
1/40 |
3.6mg decrease |
Crevice corrosion |
Comparative material 4 |
4 |
3/40 |
44mg decrease |
Crevice corrosion |
12/40 |
325mg decrease |
Crevice corrosion |
Present invention example 1 |
5 |
0/40 |
2.8mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
1.5mg increase |
No corrosion |
Present invention example 2 |
6 |
0/40 |
2.9mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
3.1mg increase |
No corrosion |
Present invention example 3 |
7 |
0/40 |
3.4mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
2.7mg increase |
No corrosion |
Present invention example 4 |
8 |
0/40 |
2.6mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
1.9mg increase |
No corrosion |
Example beyond invention range 1 |
9 |
0/40 |
3.3mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
4.3mg increase |
No corrosion |
Example beyond invention range 2 |
10 |
5/40 |
108mg decrease |
Crevice corrosion |
6/40 |
469mg decrease |
Crevice corrosion |
Example beyond invention range 3 |
11 |
0/40 |
1.8mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
2.3mg increase |
No corrosion |
Present invention example 5 (claim 2) |
12 |
0/40 |
1.1mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
0.9mg increase |
No corrosion |
Present invention example 6 (claim 2) |
13 |
0/40 |
1.6mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
1.1mg increase |
No corrosion |
Present invention example 7 (claim 2) |
14 |
0/40 |
2.4mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
2.1mg increase |
No corrosion |
Present invention example 8 (claim 2) |
15 |
0/40 |
2.9mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
2.7mg increase |
No corrosion |
Present invention example 9 (claim 2) |
16 |
0/40 |
2.7mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
1.8mg increase |
No corrosion |
Present invention example 10 (claim 2) |
17 |
0/40 |
3.1mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
1.9mg increase |
No corrosion |
Present invention example 11 (claim 2) |
18 |
0/40 |
2.2mg increase |
No corrosion |
0/40 |
2.1mg increase |
No corrosion |
[0102] As for "Corrosion occurrence rate" in Table 2, "40" as denominators is the number
of crevices formed between the test piece 1 and the clevis 2 due to the trenches of
the clevis 2. The numbers as numerators are the number of portions where corrosion
occurred among portions corresponding to the crevices on the surface of the test piece
1.
[0103] Results of the tests in the above "environment not containing bromine ions substantially"
are as follows.
[0104] Corrosion did not occur at all in the 40 crevices in all of Present invention examples
(Present invention examples 1 to 4 and 5 to 11), Comparative materials 1 to 3, and
Examples beyond invention range 1 and 3. In these samples, oxidation coloring was
found in a portion other than the portions corresponding to the crevices, and a minute
increase in weight due to the oxidation was found.
[0105] Crevice corrosion occurred in Comparative material 4 (material described in Patent
Document 3) and Example beyond invention range 2 (material having a content of Ru
lower than the range of the present invention). As for these samples, white corrosion
products were found in a portion corresponding to the crevices, and the weight was
decreased by more than 40 mg by the corrosion.
[0106] Results of tests in the above "bromine-ion-containing environment" were as follows.
[0107] Corrosion did not occur at all in the 40 crevices in all of Present invention examples
(Present invention examples 1 to 4 and 5 to 11), and Examples beyond invention range
1 and 3. In these samples, oxidation coloring was found in a portion other than the
portions corresponding to the crevices, and a minute increase in weight due to the
oxidation was found.
[0108] Crevice corrosion occurred in Comparative materials 1 to 4 and Example beyond invention
range 2. Among these samples, the weight was decreased particularly largely by corrosion
in Comparative material 4 and Example beyond invention range 2.
[0109] It is found out that Present invention examples have high corrosion resistance (crevice
corrosion resistance) both in a chloride environment that does not contain bromine
ions substantially and a chloride environment containing bromine ions.
2-2. Processability
[0110] Table 3 shows results of bendability tests (sealing-bending) and tension tests.
[Table 3]
|
Sample number |
Sealing-bending in T-direction |
Stretch in L-direction (%) |
Comparative material 1 |
1 |
C |
29 |
Comparative material 2 |
2 |
A |
52 |
Comparative material 3 |
3 |
C |
35 |
Comparative material 4 |
4 |
B |
49 |
Present invention example 1 |
5 |
A |
54 |
Present invention example 2 |
6 |
B |
46 |
Present invention example 3 |
7 |
A |
53 |
Present invention example 4 |
8 |
A |
54 |
Example beyond invention range 1 |
9 |
C |
43 |
Example beyond invention range 2 |
10 |
A |
56 |
Example beyond invention range 3 |
11 |
C |
49 |
Present invention example 5 (claim 2) |
12 |
B |
44 |
Present invention example 6 (claim 2) |
13 |
B |
45 |
Present invention example 7 (claim 2) |
14 |
B |
47 |
Present invention example 8 (claim 2) |
15 |
A |
50 |
Present invention example 9 (claim 2) |
16 |
B |
45 |
Present invention example 10 (claim 2) |
17 |
B |
47 |
Present invention example 11 (claim 2) |
18 |
B |
46 |
[0111] In Table 3, alphabetical characters in the cells of "sealing-bending in T-direction"
denote the following.
- A: A break was not generated.
- B: A fine break was generated in any of the test pieces.
- C: A break was generated in any of the test pieces.
[0112] As for Comparative materials 1 and 3, breaks were generated by sealing-bending in
the T-direction and stretches in the L-direction were small. That is, the bendability
of Comparative materials 1 and 3 was low. As for Comparative material 2, a break was
not seen in sealing-bending in the T-direction and the stretch in the L-direction
was as large as that of a JIS type-1 material. As for Comparative material 4, although
the stretch in the L-direction was as high as that of a JIS type-1 material, a fine
break was seen on the surface of the test piece in sealing-bending in the T-direction.
[0113] As for each of Present invention examples 1, 3, 4, and 8, a break was not seen in
sealing-bending in the T-direction, and the stretch in the L-direction was as high
as that of JIS type-1 titanium, which is 50 % or more. In contrast, as for Present
invention examples 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11, the stretch in the L-direction was lower
than that of the other Present invention examples, which is lower than 50 %, and fine
breaks were generated on the surface in sealing-bending in the T-direction. In this
manner, Present invention examples 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11 have lower processability
than Present invention examples 1, 3, 4, and 8. Present invention example 8 has a
relatively smaller stretch in the L-direction than Present invention examples 1, 3,
and 4.
[0114] As for Example beyond invention range 1, the stretch in the L-direction was poor
and a break was generated in sealing-bending in the T-direction. As for Example beyond
invention range 2, both results of sealing-bending in the T-direction and the stretch
in the L-direction were favorable. As for Example beyond invention range 3, although
the stretch in the L-direction was large, a break was generated in sealing-bending
in the T-direction.
[0115] In general, the processability tends to increase as the O content is lower and the
contents of Ni, Cr, Co, Mo, W, and V are lower. Each of Present invention examples
1, 3, and 4 has more favorable processability than Present invention example 2 possibly
because the O content of Present invention examples 1,3, and 4 was less than 0.05
mass% whereas the O content of Present invention example 2 was 0.05 mass% or more
(however, the O content is less than 0.1 mass% and is within the region of the present
invention). Each of Present invention examples 5 to 11 has lower processability than
Present invention examples 1, 3, and 4 possibly because each of Present invention
examples 5 to 11 contains any of Ni, Cr, Co, Mo, W, and V.
[0116] The content of the rare earth element(s) of Example beyond invention range 3 exceeded
the range of the content of the rare earth element(s) in the present invention (0.01
to 0.10 mass%), and a compound containing a rare earth element was produced in this
sample. The break generated by sealing-bending in the T-direction of Example beyond
invention range 3 was assumed to have started from this compound.
3. Overall evaluation
[0117] The overall evaluation of each sample was performed by taking into consideration
the above test results and economic efficiency.
[0118] Table 4 shows calculation results of cost of a platinum group element in the price
of row materials, based on the ratio of the platinum group element contained in the
samples. In calculation, the price of the bare metal of the platinum group element
was set to ¥1905/g for Pd and ¥300/g for Ru.
[Table 4]
|
Sample number |
Pd (mass%) |
Ru (mass%) |
Cost of platinum group element (¥/kg) |
Relative cost of platinum group element |
Comparative material 1 |
1 |
0.14 |
- |
2667 |
100.00 |
Comparative material 2 |
2 |
0.06 |
- |
1143 |
42.86 |
Comparative material 3 |
3 |
- |
0.054 |
162 |
6.07 |
Comparative material 4 |
4 |
- |
0.052 |
156 |
5.85 |
Present invention example 1 |
5 |
- |
0.042 |
126 |
4.72 |
Present invention example 2 |
6 |
- |
0.049 |
147 |
5.51 |
Present invention example 3 |
7 |
- |
0.087 |
261 |
9.79 |
Present invention example 4 |
8 |
- |
0.013 |
39 |
1.46 |
Example beyond invention range 1 |
9 |
- |
0.048 |
144 |
5.40 |
Example beyond invention range 2 |
10 |
- |
0.004 |
12 |
0.45 |
Example beyond invention range 3 |
11 |
- |
0.043 |
129 |
4.84 |
Present invention example 5 (claim 2) |
12 |
- |
0.025 |
75 |
2.81 |
Present invention example 6 (claim 2) |
13 |
- |
0.027 |
81 |
3.04 |
Present invention example 7 (claim 2) |
14 |
- |
0.028 |
84 |
3.15 |
Present invention example 8 (claim 2) |
15 |
- |
0.029 |
87 |
3.26 |
Present invention example 9 (claim 2) |
16 |
- |
0.028 |
84 |
3.15 |
Present invention example 10 (claim 2) |
17 |
- |
0.027 |
81 |
3.04 |
Present invention example 11 (claim 2) |
18 |
- |
0.029 |
87 |
3.26 |
[0119] In Table 4, "Cost of platinum group element" means the cost (¥) of the platinum group
element in 1 kg of the titanium alloy, and "Relative cost of platinum group element"
means the cost ratio of the platinum group element in each sample when the cost of
the platinum group element of Comparative material 1 is set to 100. On the assumption
of the above price of the bare metal, the cost of the platinum group element of each
Present invention example is 1/10 or less of the cost of the platinum group element
of Comparative material 1, and is 1/4 or less of the cost of the platinum group element
of Comparative material 2.
[0120] Table 5 shows results of the overall evaluation of Comparative materials and Present
invention examples.
[Table 5]
|
Crevice corrosion resistance |
Processability |
Economic efficiency |
Overall evaluation |
Environment not containing bromine ions substantially |
Environment containing bromine ions |
Comparative material 1 |
A |
C |
C |
C |
- |
Comparative material 2 |
A |
C |
A |
C |
- |
Comparative material 3 |
A |
C |
C |
A |
- |
Comparative material 4 |
C |
C |
B |
A |
- |
Present invention examples |
A |
A |
A to B |
A |
A |
[0121] In Table 5, the evaluation is made for each evaluation item in three grades: A (excellent),
B (relatively poor), and C (poor).
[0122] As described above, the processability of the present invention may become relatively
poor in some cases (such as in Present invention example 2). Further, the processability
is considered to become poor in a case in which the content of O is 0.05 mass% or
more or in a case in which Ni, Cr, Co, Mo, W, or V is contained. Accordingly, in a
case of being used in a usage that puts much value on processability, the titanium
alloy according to the present invention has the O content of less than 0.05 mass%
and does not contain Ni, Cr, Co, Mo, W, and V substantially.
[0123] Other than processability, the present invention is excellent in all the items.
[0124] In contrast, Comparative materials are poor in any of the evaluation items. In particular,
none of Comparative materials has crevice corrosion resistance that is high enough
to be used substantially in a bromine-ion-containing environment.
[Example 2]
2.1 Composition of titanium alloy used in Example 2
[0125] In order to clarify an optimal content of the rare earth element(s) and to confirm
that Ru has high corrosion resistance to bromine among platinum group elements, the
following experiment was performed. Table 6 shows compositions of titanium alloys
used in Example 2. In accordance with the method for manufacturing the samples shown
in Example 1, alloys having the compositions shown in Table 6 were obtained.
[Table 6]
Type |
Rare earth element |
Platinum group element |
Ni |
Cr |
Co |
Mo |
W |
V |
O |
C |
H |
N |
Fe |
Bal. |
Comparative material 5 |
- |
Ru: 0.02 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.05 |
0.004 |
0.0024 |
0.006 |
0.05 |
Ti+Impurities |
Comparative material 6 |
Y: 4 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.06 |
0.006 |
0.0032 |
0.005 |
0.04 |
Ti+Impurities |
Present invention example 12 |
Y: 11 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.05 |
0.007 |
0.0027 |
0.005 |
0.04 |
Ti+Impurities |
Present invention example 13 |
Y: 21 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.06 |
0.005 |
0.0035 |
0.004 |
0.05 |
Ti+Impurities |
Present invention example 14 |
Y: 40 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.08 |
0.006 |
0.0038 |
0.006 |
0.05 |
Ti+Impurities |
Present invention example 15 |
Y: 190 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.07 |
0.005 |
0.0024 |
0.007 |
0.06 |
Ti+Impurities |
Present invention example 16 |
Mm: 21 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.06 |
0.007 |
0.0033 |
0.006 |
0.04 |
Ti+Impurities |
Present invention example 17 |
Mm: 23 ppm |
Ru: 0.04 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.07 |
0.006 |
0.0028 |
0.007 |
0.04 |
Ti+Impurities |
Present invention example 18 |
Mm: 21 ppm |
Ru: 0.05 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.06 |
0.007 |
0.0024 |
0.005 |
0.05 |
Ti+Impurities |
Present invention example 19 |
Mm: 25 ppm |
Ru: 0.06 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.07 |
0.005 |
0.0032 |
0.006 |
0.06 |
Ti+Impurities |
[0126] Comparative materials 5 and 6 contain a rare earth element in less than 0.001 %,
and is beyond the range of the present invention. From the materials shown in Table
6, a titanium alloy sheet for crevice corrosion tests in FIG. 2 was obtained by machining,
and using the test piece, the crevice corrosion test piece shown in FIG. 3 was formed.
Note that the torque at the time of tightening was 40 kgf · cm. This crevice corrosion
test piece was used in each crevice corrosion test in a bromine-ion-containing environment
described in 1-2-3.
[0127] Table 7 shows results obtained by performing 500-hour crevice corrosion tests. In
Comparative material 5 which does not contain a rare earth element, crevice corrosion
was seen in a large number of portions, and the decrease due to corrosion was 325
mg. In Comparative material 6 which does not contain a sufficient rare earth element,
crevice corrosion was also seen, and the decrease due to corrosion was 32 mg. It is
considered that a desirable content of rare earth element(s) is 200 ppm or less in
a bromide-ion-containing environment. The content of the rare earth element in each
of Present invention examples 12 to 15 was within the range of the present invention,
and accordingly, crevice corrosion did not occur, and the decrease in weight thereof
due to corrosion was small.
[Table 7]
|
250 g/L-NaCl, Br 0.01 mol/L pH = 2, 150°C |
Type |
Rare earth element |
Platinum group element |
Corrosion occurrence rate |
Increase/ decrease in weight |
Note |
Comparative material 5 |
- |
Ru: 0.02 |
15/40 |
325mg decrease |
Crevice corrosion |
Comparative material 6 |
Y: 4 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
3/40 |
32mg decrease |
Crevice corrosion |
Present invention example 12 |
Y: 11 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
0/40 |
2.1mg increase |
No crevice corrosion |
Present invention example 13 |
Y: 21 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
0/40 |
1.8mg increase |
No crevice corrosion |
Present invention example 14 |
Y: 40 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
0/40 |
2.2mg increase |
No crevice corrosion |
Present invention example 15 |
Y: 190 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
0/40 |
1.9mg increase |
No crevice corrosion |
[0128] Next, crevice corrosion test pieces of materials of Present invention examples 16
to 19 having different contents of Ru were used in crevice corrosion tests in the
bromine-ion-containing environment shown in 1-2-3. Further, Eriksen tests based on
JIS Z 2247 were performed to investigate the press formability of the materials.
[0129] For the tests, a sheet material having a thickness of 2 mm and a size of 90 mm ×
90 mm was prepared, and a steel ball having diameter of 20 mm was pressed into the
sheet material. When a break reaches the rear surface, the stroke of the punch at
that time was set as the Eriksen value. Formation tests were performed using graphite
grease for lubricating at a speed of 5 mm/min. The results are shown in Table 8.
[Table 8]
|
250 g/L-NaCl, Br 0.01 mol/L pH = 2, 150°C |
Eriksen value |
Type |
Rare earth element |
Platinum group element |
Corrosion occurrence rate |
Increase/ decrease in weight |
Note |
Based on JIS Z 2247 |
Present invention example 16 |
Mm: 21 ppm |
Ru: 0.02 |
0/40 |
4.1mg increase |
No crevice corrosion |
11.4 mm |
Present invention example 17 |
Mm: 23 ppm |
Ru: 0.04 |
0/40 |
2.8mg increase |
No crevice corrosion |
10.6 mm |
Present invention example 18 |
Mm: 21 ppm |
Ru: 0.05 |
0/40 |
3.2mg increase |
No crevice corrosion |
10.1 mm |
Present invention example 19 |
Mm: 25 ppm |
Ru: 0.06 |
0/40 |
2.9mg increase |
No crevice corrosion |
9.6 mm |
[0130] In Present invention examples 16 to 18, crevice corrosion did not occur, and accordingly,
Present invention examples 16 to 18 have high corrosion resistance in an environment
of a bromide-ion-containing solution. Note that the Eriksen value representing formability
was decreased slightly when the content of Ru exceeded 0.05 %. In contrast, as the
content of Ru was increased, the decrease in weight due to corrosion tended to be
decreased. In order to achieve both high corrosion resistance and formability, Ru
is preferably set to a range of 0.01 to 0.05 %.
[0131] The thus obtained experimental facts have revealed that particularly high corrosion
resistance can be obtained when the content of the rare earth element(s) is greater
than or equal to 0.001 and less than 0.02 % in the present invention range. Further,
when the Ru content is 0.01 to 0.05 %, high formability can also be secured.
[Industrial Applicability]
[0132] The titanium alloy according to the present invention can be applied to equipment,
apparatuses, and the like that are to be used in an environment that requires corrosion
resistance in a bromine-ion-containing environment (in particular, a high-temperature
and high-concentration chloride environment).