[0001] The present invention relates to a hot rolling mill according to the preamble of
claim 1 and methods of hot rolling a steel plate or sheet using such hot rolling mill,
as defined in claims 3 and 4.
Background Art
[0002] In recent years, in the process of manufacturing a steel plate or sheet by hot rolling,
a variety of temperature control of a material to can realize production of a steel
plate or sheet having excellent characteristics has been conducted.
[0003] For example, a high-performance steel plate or sheet is produced by application of
controlled rolling (CR), in which finish rolling in the non-recrystallization temperature
range.
[0004] Manufacture of a thin-scale steel sheet by supplying cooling water onto a steel plate
or sheet that has just left the roll bite in a hot rolling mill to cool the surfaces
thereof to minimize scale formation has been studied.
[0005] Examples of techniques used to control the temperature of a rolling material include
the following:
For example, Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2002-361315 discloses a technique for cooling a steel sheet by supplying cooling water during
hot finish rolling of the steel sheet. In this technique, a laminar water flow is
supplied from a slit-shaped nozzle of a header provided between finishing stands to
realize high cooling rate. It is said that this technique can be used for manufacturing
a fine-grain steel plate or sheet.
[0006] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No.
62-260022 discloses a technique for cooling a hot steel plate or sheet by supplying cooling
water. This technique uses opposing nozzle units that jet cooling water and that is
liftable. It is said that a wide range of cooling rate can be ensured by using the
nozzle units in combination with an additional laminar nozzle or a spray nozzle.
[0007] However, the techniques disclosed in the above-mentioned Japanese Unexamined Patent
Application Publication Nos.
2002-361315 and
62-260022 have problems in terms of equipment cost, equipment maintainability, cooling performance,
and the like.
[0008] First, in the technique disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No.
2002-361315, the cooling water supplied onto the top surface of a steel plate or sheet remains
there for a while. When the state of remaining water changes, however, a cooling area
of the steel plate or sheet changes, whereby precise temperature control cannot be
performed. Further, a header containing a flow adjuster contributes to an increase
in size of the equipment, which limits how close the equipment and the rolling mill
can be arranged to each other. Thus, this technique is not suitable for manufacturing
a thin-scale steel sheet.
[0009] Second, in the technique disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No.
62-260022, the slit-shaped nozzle units need to be brought close to a steel plate or sheet.
In the case of the slit-shaped nozzle units cooling a steel plate or sheet whose leading
end or trailing end is warped, the steel plate or sheet may collide with the slit-shaped
nozzle units and damage them, or may become immovable, thereby stopping the manufacturing
line or lowering the yield rate. The slit-shaped nozzle units may be moved upward
by actuating a lifting equipment when the leading end or the trailing end passes.
In that case, however, the leading end or the trailing end is not sufficiently cooled,
whereby the desired quality cannot be realized. The cost for installing the lifting
equipment is also problematic. Further, the presence of the lifting equipment makes
it difficult to install the nozzle units close to the rolling mill. Thus, this technique
is not suitable for manufacturing a thin-scale steel sheet.
[0010] Moreover, the techniques disclosed in the above-mentioned Japanese Unexamined Patent
Application Publication Nos.
2002-361315 and
62-260022 require the use of the slit-shaped nozzle. The nozzle opening needs to be maintained
clean, otherwise a laminar cooling water flow cannot be obtained. For example, as
shown in FIG. 6, if foreign matter 60 adheres to and clogs a nozzle opening of a slit-shaped
nozzle 52, a laminar water flow 53 is split. Further, the cooling water needs to be
jetted at a high pressure to retain the cooling water within a jet area (cooling area).
However, if the laminar water flow 53 is jetted at a high pressure, the jet pressure
becomes unbalanced, which tends to cause a split of the laminar water flow 53. If
the laminar water flow 53 is not properly produced, the cooling water flows toward
the upstream or the downstream of the jet area and remains on the steel plate or sheet.
This partially cools the steel plate or sheet 10 and leads to a temperature deviation.
Although there is a technique for removing the cooling water remaining on the top
surface of the steel plate or sheet 10 by using a side spray or the like, the cooling
water cannot be completely removed if there is a large amount thereof. Therefore,
the temperature deviation occurs.
[0011] Reference is made to
JP 2002 079304 A. The two-part form adopted in the independent claim below is based on this document.
[0012] The present invention has been made in view of the above-described situations. It
is an object of the invention to provide a hot rolling mill for a steel plate or sheet,
which is superior in terms of equipment cost, equipment maintainability, and cooling
performance and is capable of efficiently manufacturing a steel plate or sheet having
good characteristics by appropriately controlling the temperature of a rolling material
when performing hot rolling of the steel plate or sheet; and a method for hot rolling
a steel plates or sheet.
Disclosure of Invention
[0013] The present invention is defined in claim 1 below, and has the following features:
- [1] A hot rolling mill for a steel plate or sheet, including cooling equipment for
supplying cooling water onto a top surface of the steel plate or sheet that is being
conveyed, the cooling equipment being provided at a position near the rolling mill,
on an entrance side and/or an exit side thereof, the cooling equipment including a
header having nozzles arranged in a plurality of rows in the transferring direction
for jetting rod-like water flows onto the top surface of the steel plate or sheet
at an angle of depression in the range of 30° to 60° toward the rolling mill, the
header being positioned such that the cooling water supplied to the steel plate or
sheet is retained by work rolls of the rolling mill.
A rod-like water flow (also referred to as a "plume cooling water flow") of the present
invention refers to a cooling water flow jetted from a circular (including ellipsoidal
and polygonal) nozzle opening. The rod-like water flow of the present invention is
not a spray-like flow but a continuous and straight cooling water flow whose cross-section
keeps substantially circular shape since it is jetted from a nozzle opening until
it hits a steel plate or sheet.
- [2] The hot rolling mill for a steel plate or sheet according to the above-described
[1], wherein the cooling equipment further includes a header having nozzles for jetting
rod-like water flows onto a bottom surface of the steel plate or sheet at an angle
of elevation in the range of 45° to 90° toward the rolling mill, the header being
positioned between the work rolls of the rolling mill and a table roller adjacent
thereto.
- [3] A method for hot rolling a steel plate or sheet using the hot rolling mill for
a steel plate or sheet according to the above-described [1] or [2], wherein it includes
conducting rolling while jetting the cooling water such that the cooling water supplied
onto the steel plate or sheet reaches the work rolls of the rolling mill.
- [4] A method for hot rolling a steel plate or sheet using the hot rolling mill for
a steel plate or sheet according to the above-described [1] or [2], wherein it includes
jetting the cooling water while setting a roll gap of the work rolls to 2 mm or smaller
in rolling interval.
[0014] Embodiments of the present invention can provide superiority in terms of equipment
cost, equipment maintainability, and cooling performance, and can be capable of efficiently
manufacturing a steel plate or sheet having good characteristics by appropriately
controlling the temperature of a rolling material in conducting hot rolling of a steel
plate or sheet.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0015]
FIG. 1 is an arrangement drawing of a hot rolling mill for a steel plate or sheet
according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is an arrangement drawing of another hot rolling mill for a steel plate or
sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a detail drawing of cooling equipment according to an embodiment of the
present invention;
FIG. 4 is a detail drawing of cooling equipment according to an embodiment of the
present invention;
FIG. 5 shows an exemplary arrangement of nozzles of a header according to an embodiment
of the present invention; and
FIG. 6 shows a related art.
(Description of Reference Numerals)
[0016] 10: steel plate or sheet, 11: reheating furnace, 12: hot rolling mill, 12a: work
roll, 13: table roller, 20: cooling equipment, 21: upper header, 22: upper nozzle,
23: rod-like water flow, 24: remaining water, 25: cooling water, 31: lower header,
32: lower nozzle, 33: rod-like water flow, and 34: supplied cooling water
Detailed Description
[0017] Embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the
drawings.
[0018] FIGS. 1 and 2 shows hot rolling mills according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 1 shows a hot rolling mill for a steel plate or a hot roughing mill for a steel
sheet, and FIG. 2 shows a hot finishing mill for a steel sheet.
[0019] FIG. 1 shows a reheating furnace 11 for heating a slab to a predetermined temperature,
a rolling mill (herein, a reverse rolling mill) 12 for rolling the slab 10 extracted
from the reheating furnace 11 into a steel plate or sheet 10 having a predetermined
thickness, and cooling equipment 20 for supplying cooling water onto the top and bottom
surfaces of the slab (steel plate or sheet) 10 that is being conveyed. The cooling
equipment 20 is provided close to the entrance side (upstream side) and the exit side
(downstream side) of the rolling mill 12. In FIG. 1, a table roller is denoted by
reference numeral 13.
[0020] FIG. 2 shows a reheating furnace 11 for heating a slab to a predetermined temperature,
a roughing mill (not shown) for rough rolling the slab 10 extracted from the reheating
furnace 11 into a steel plate or sheet 10 having a predetermined thickness, a finishing
mill (herein, a tandem mill) 12 for rolling the rough rolled steel plate or sheet
10 to a predetermined finished thickness, and a cooling equipment 20 for supplying
cooling water onto the top and bottom surfaces of the steel plate or sheet 10 that
is being conveyed. The cooling equipment 20 is provided close to the exit side (downstream
side) of the rolling mill 12. In FIG. 2, a table roller is denoted by reference numeral
13.
[0021] As shown in FIG. 3, the cooling equipment 20 has an upper header 21 including upper
nozzles (circular tube nozzles) 22 for jetting rod-like water flows 23 against the
top surface of the steel plate or sheet 10 at an angle of depression θ
U in the range of 30° to 60° toward work rolls 12a of the rolling mill 12. The upper
header 21 is positioned such that the water supplied onto the top surface of the steel
plate or sheet 10, i.e., remaining water 24, is retained by the work rolls 12a of
the rolling mill 12. The cooling equipment 20 further has a lower header 31 including
lower nozzles (circular tube nozzles) 32 for jetting rod-like water flows 33 against
the bottom surface of the steel plate or sheet 10 at an angle of elevation θ
L in the range of 45° to 90° toward the work rolls 12a of the rolling mill 12. The
lower header 31 is positioned between work rolls 12a of the rolling mill 12 and a
table roller 13a adjacent thereto.
[0022] FIG. 5 shows an exemplary arrangement of the circular tube nozzles 22 mounted on
the upper header 21. The circular tube nozzles 22 are arranged in a plurality of rows
(herein, six rows) in the transfering direction of the steel plate or sheet 10, and
are arranged in the plate or sheet width direction such that they can supply the cooling
water onto the overall width of the steel plate or sheet 10 that is being conveyed.
The circular tube nozzles 32 mounted on the lower header 31 are arranged in a similar
manner.
[0023] The circular tube nozzles are arranged in the plurality of rows in the transfering
direction because it is difficult to retain the remaining water from the cooling water
jetted against the steel plate or sheet with a single row of nozzles. Accordingly,
it is preferable that the circular tube nozzles be arranged in at least three rows,
more preferably, at least five rows, in the transfering direction. The circular tube
nozzles 22 and 32 are arranged in the plate or sheet width direction such that they
can supply the cooling water onto the overall width of the steel plate or sheet 10
that is being conveyed. Although only one upper header is provided herein, two or
more headers having the circular tube nozzles 22 may be provided.
[0024] In the present embodiment, the cooling water jetted from the upper nozzles 22 is
composed of the rod-like water flows because the rod-like water flows can be produced
more stably and have greater power to retain the remaining water than a laminar water
flow or the like.
[0025] Another reason for using the rod-like water flows is that, in the case of obliquely
jetting a laminar water flow, the laminar water flow becomes thin near the steel plate
or sheet as the distance between the steel plate or sheet and the nozzles increases.
This may result in higher probability of occurrence of a split.
[0026] The angle of depression θ
U of the rod-like water flows 23 jetted from the upper nozzles 22 is set in the range
of 30° to 60° because, if the angle of depression θ
U is smaller than 30°, the rod-like water flows 23 have a small velocity component
in the vertical direction, which weakens the jetting of the rod-like water flows 23
against the steel plate or sheet 10 and degrades cooling performance; and because,
if the angle of depression θ
u is greater than 60°, the rod-like water flows 23 have an insufficient velocity component
in the transfering direction, which makes it more difficult to retain the remaining
water 24, allows the remaining water 24 to flow outside of the transfering direction,
and makes the cooling area unstable. A more preferable angle of depression θ
u is 40 to 50°.
[0027] The angle of elevation θ
L of the rod-like water flows 33 jetted from the lower nozzles 32 is set in the range
of 45 to 90° because, if the angle of elevation θ
L is smaller than 45°, the rod-like water flows have a small velocity component in
the vertical direction, which weakens the jetting of the rod-like water flows against
the steel plate or sheet 10 and degrades cooling performance, and the distance between
the work rolls 12a and the table roller 13a must be increased; and because, if the
angle of elevation θ
L is greater than 90°, the cooling water is splashed around the rolling mill 12, which
is undesirable from the viewpoint of the operability and equipment maintainability.
[0028] The cooling equipment 20 supplies the cooling water from the upper header 21 onto
the top surface of the steel plate or sheet 10 such that the water flow rate at the
surface of the steel plate or sheet is at least 4 m
3/m
2/min, and supplies the cooling water from the lower header 31 onto the bottom surface
of the steel plate or sheet 10 such that the water flow rate at the surface of the
steel plate or sheet is at least 4 m
3/m
2/min.
[0029] The reason for setting the water flow rate to at least 4 m
3/m
2/min is as follows. The remaining water 24 shown in FIG. 3 is produced by being retained
by the rod-like water flows 23 supplied onto the top surface of the steel plate or
sheet 10. At this time, if the water flow rate is low, the remaining water 24 cannot
be retained. If the water flow rate is higher than a predetermined level, the amount
of remaining water 24 that can be retained increases. This balances the amount of
the cooling water that overflows from the ends of the steel plate or sheet in the
width direction and the amount of the cooling water that is supplied onto the steel
plate or sheet, whereby the amount of the remaining water 24 is maintained at a constant
level.
[0030] A typical steel plate has a width of 2 to 5 m. If the steel plate is cooled at a
water flow rate of 4 m
3/m
2/min or higher, the remaining water can stay at a water cooling area over the width.
Accordingly, the steel plate or sheet 10 can be cooled to a desired temperature during
the rolling path.
[0031] If the water flow rate is set at 4 m
3/m
2/min or higher, waiting time for desired temperature drop can be reduced with various
controlled rolling materials. For example, if the water flow rate is low, a reduction
in waiting time can only be achieved with thin rolling materials. If the water flow
rate is increased, a reduction in waiting time can be achieved with rolling materials
having certain thicknesses. However, the effect of waiting time reduction achieved
by increasing the amount of water becomes small as the water flow rate increases.
Accordingly, it is preferable that the water flow rate be determined while taking
into consideration the effect of waiting time reduction, the equipment cost, and the
like. A more preferable water flow rate is 4 to 10 m
3/m
2/min.
[0032] Preferably, the upper nozzles 22 jet the rod-like water flows 23 at a jet velocity
of at least 8 m/s. The maximum number of the rows may be appropriately determined
on the basis of the size, speed of travel, target temperature, etc., of the steel
plate or sheet to be cooled. A jet velocity exceeding 30 m/s may result in large pressure
loss and increased wear of the inner surfaces of the nozzles. Further, the capacity
of a pump and the outside diameter of a pipe may be increased, which leads to excessive
equipment cost. Accordingly, it is preferable that the jet velocity be 30 m/s or lower.
[0033] The inside diameter of the nozzles may be in the range of 3 to 8 mm to avoid clogging
of the nozzles and to ensure a certain jet velocity of the cooling water. The distance
between adjacent nozzles aligned along an imaginary line in the plate or sheet width
direction may be set within a range ten times the inside diameter of the nozzles to
prevent the cooling water from flowing between the rod-like water flows.
[0034] Further, in the case of supplying a laminar water flow, which is not stable, onto
the steel plate or sheet 10, the header needs to be brought close to the steel plate
or sheet 10. In contrast, in the case of supplying the rod-like water flows 23 onto
the steel plate or sheet, the upper header 21 may be provided at a position upwardly
away from a pass line. Therefore, it is preferable that tips of the upper nozzles
22 be positioned away from the pass line to prevent upper nozzles 22a and 22b from
being damaged by the warped steel plate or sheet 10 or the like. However, if the distance
is too large, the cooling water becomes diffused and loses its rod-like shape, whereby
the effect of retaining the cooling water is deteriorated. Therefore, it is preferable
that the distance between the pass line and the tips of the upper nozzles 22 be set
in the range of 500 mm to 1800 mm.
[0035] When performing hot rolling of a steel plate or sheet using the hot rolling mill
of the above-described structure, the hot rolling is performed while jetting the rod-like
water flows 23 and 33 so that the remaining water 24 supplied onto the top surface
of the steel plate or sheet 10 and the cooling water 34 supplied onto the bottom surface
of the steel plate or sheet 10 reach the work rolls 12a of the rolling mill 12.
[0036] As described above, in the present embodiment, the rod-like water flows 23 are jetted
against the top surface of the steel plate or sheet 10 at an angle of depression θ
U in the range of 30° to 60° toward the work rolls 12a so that the remaining water
24 supplied onto the top surface of the steel plate or sheet 10 reaches the work rolls
12a. Therefore, the remaining water 24 is retained between the work rolls 12a and
the rod-like water flows 23, and a stable cooling area is formed. Accordingly, the
problem that the remaining water 24 randomly moves over the steel plate or sheet 10
to nonuniformly cool the steel plate or sheet 10, thereby causing a temperature deviation
can be eliminated, and the steel plate or sheet 10 can be uniformly cooled.
[0037] Herein, the cooling area refers to a area of the steel plate or sheet 10 between
a position sandwiched between the work rolls and a position at which the rod-like
water flows jetted from the circular tube nozzles of the upper header, which are positioned
at the furthermost row (outermost row) from the work rolls, hit.
[0038] By producing the cooling area in this manner, the distance between the roll bite
of the work rolls 12a and a cooling-start position (a position from where cooling
by the cooling water starts) becomes zero.
[0039] Because the tips of the upper nozzles 22 may be provided a certain distance away
from the pass line, even when a steel plate or sheet whose leading end or trailing
end is warped is cooled, the steel plate or sheet 10 does not collide with and damage
the upper header 21 nor become immovable. Thus, a stoppage of the manufacturing line
or a lowering of the yield rate can be avoided. Because a lifting system for preventing
the steel plate or sheet 10 from colliding with the upper header 21 is not necessary,
the equipment cost can be reduced.
[0040] Further, because a lifting system or the like is not provided, the upper header 21
can be provided close to the rolling mill 12. By supplying cooling water onto the
steel plate or sheet 10 that has just left the roll bite of the rolling mill 12 to
reduce the temperature of the surface of the steel plate or sheet 10, scale formation
can be suppressed. Accordingly, the hot rolling mill suitable for manufacturing a
thin-scale steel sheet can be provided.
[0041] Further, because the cooling water 24 and the cooling water 34 supplied onto the
steel plate or sheet 10 contact the surfaces of the work rolls 12a and cool the work
rolls 12a, an additional cooling system for cooling rolls is not necessary. Accordingly,
the equipment cost can be reduced.
[0042] Further, by jetting the cooling water 23 and the cooling water 33 when the work rolls
12a do not roll the steel plate or sheet 10, such as an interval between passes, or
an interval between a passing of a preceding rolling material and a passing of a following
rolling material, the cooling water 25 jetted thereon flows as shown in FIG. 4. Thus,
it becomes possible to supply a large amount of cooling water to the upper and lower
work rolls 12a. This suppresses a thermal crown from developing, whereby highly accurate
size control becomes possible. At that time, if the roll gap is set to have a certain
allowance, and if an interval between a passing of a preceding rolling material and
a passing of a following rolling material is 45 seconds or more, for example, the
cooling water 23 and the cooling water 33 may be jetted while temporarily narrowing
the roll gap between the work rolls 12a to about 2 mm. This prevents the cooling water
25 from passing through the roll gap and being splashed around. Further, this enables
the cooling water 25 to be supplied onto a wider area in the peripheral direction
of the work rolls 12a. Needless to say, if such a cooling of the rolls in an interval
between passes or the like is not necessary, the jetting of the cooling water 23 and
the cooling water 33 may be stopped.
[0043] As described above, the present embodiment provides superiority in terms of equipment
cost, equipment maintainability, and cooling performance, and is capable of efficiently
manufacturing a steel plate or sheet having good characteristics by appropriately
controlling the temperature of a rolling material in conducting hot rolling of a steel
plate or sheet.
[0044] In the present embodiment, the upper headers 21 and the lower headers 31 are provided
at the entrance side and the exit side, respectively, of the rolling mill 12 in FIG.
1, and the upper headers 21 and the lower headers 31 are provided at the exit side
of the rolling mill 12 in FIG. 2. However, the present invention is not limited thereto.
In the case where the installation space is limited, or the available effect may be
limited, for example, the upper headers 21 and the lower headers 31 may be provided
at one of the entrance side and the exit side of the rolling mill 12. Alternatively,
only the upper headers 21, without lower headers 31, may be provided. However, in
order to prevent the rolling material from being warped while being rolled by the
rolling mill 12, it is preferable that both the upper header 21 and the lower header
31 be provided so as to equalize cooling performance at both of the upper and lower
sides.
Example 1
[0045] As Example 1 of the present invention, controlled rolling of a steel plate in a hot
rolling line was conducted. After a steel plate was rolled down to a thickness of
28 mm, controlled rolling was conducted in the last three passes at a predetermined
rolling temperature.
[0046] At that time, using a hot rolling mill shown in the above-described embodiment (FIG.
1) as Example 1 of the present invention, the steel plate or sheet 10 was rolled through
four passes while being cooled by jetting the rod-like water flows from the cooling
equipment 20 provided on the entrance side and the exit side of the hot rolling mill
12 so that the temperature of the steel plate or sheet 10 became a predetermined temperature
when the processing through the four passes was finished, before conducting the controlled
rolling. The controlled rolling is then conducted in the subsequent last three passes.
[0047] The angle of depression θ
u of the upper nozzles 22 was set at 45°, and the angle of elevation θ
L of the lower nozzles 32 was set at 60°.
[0048] The inside diameters of the upper nozzles 22 and the lower nozzles 32 were set to
6 mm, and the jet velocity of the rod-like water flows was set to 8 m/s.
[0049] On the other hand, as Comparative Example 1, using a hot rolling mill having no cooling
equipment for cooling a steel plate or sheet during rolling, controlled rolling was
conducted. A steel plate or sheet having been rolled down to a thickness of 28 mm
at a relatively high temperature was cooled to a predetermined temperature by performing
air-cooling for 30 seconds before conducting controlled rolling. Then, controlled
rolling was conducted in the last three passes.
[0050] Further, as Comparative Example 2, using a hot rolling mill having cooling equipment
disclosed in the above-described Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No.
62-260022 instead of the cooling equipment 20 of Example 1 of the present invention, controlled
rolling was conducted in the same manner as Example 1 of the present invention. That
is, a steel plate or sheet was rolled while being cooled by a laminar water flow jetted
from the slit-shaped nozzle during processing through the four passes before conducting
controlled rolling so that the steel plate or sheet had a predetermined temperature
when the processing through the four passes was finished. Then, controlled rolling
was conducted in the last three passes. The header was installed such that the distance
between the roll bite of the work rolls and the cooling-start position (a position
from where cooling by the cooling water starts) was 4 m. Cooling was performed on
the steel plate or sheet that is being conveyed.
[0051] The result is shown in Table 1. In Table 1, × denotes a case where a decline in productivity
or quality occurred, and O denotes a case where a decline in productivity or quality
did not occur.
Table 1
| |
Distance to the Cooling-start Position (*) |
Method of Supplying Cooling Water |
Equipment Cost |
Damage to Equipment |
Effect of Cooling Rolls |
Rolling Pitch |
Yield Rate |
| Comparative Example 1 |
no cooling equipment |
- |
- |
- |
× no |
210 s |
reference |
| Comparative Example 2 |
4 m |
laminar water flow |
× high |
× frequently occurred |
× no |
186 s |
10% decline |
| Example1 of the Present Invention |
0 m |
rod-like water flow |
○ low |
○ no |
○ yes |
180 s |
equal to Comparative Example 1 |
| *Distance from the roll bite of the work rolls to the cooling-start position |
[0052] As shown in Table 1, in Comparative Example 1, because 30-second air-cooling was
performed before conducting controlled rolling, a rolling pitch was 210 seconds. This
shows a decline in the rolling efficiency.
[0053] In Comparative Example 2, because the lifting equipment had to be installed, the
equipment cost was high. Further, steel plates or sheets having a warped leading end
often collided with the nozzle units and damaged the equipment. The steel plates or
sheets that had damaged the equipment were deformed and unable to become finished
products. Thus, the yield rate declined as much as by 10%. Although the controlled
rolling could be performed without 30-second air-cooling, an increase in transportation
distance of a steel plate or sheet in four passes before conducting controlled rolling
increased the transportation time. Thus, in total, a rolling pitch was 186 seconds,
which is 24 seconds shorter than in Comparative Example 1.
[0054] In both Comparative Examples 1 and 2, an additional cooling system for cooling the
work rolls was required, and the equipment cost therefor was needed.
[0055] In contrast, in Example 1 of the present invention, the remaining water 24 was retained
between the work rolls 12a and the rod-like water flows 23, whereby a stabilized cooling
area was formed. This eliminated the problem that the remaining water 24 randomly
moves over the steel plate or sheet 10 to nonuniformly cool the steel plate or sheet
10, thereby causing a temperature deviation. Thus, the steel plate or sheet 10 could
be uniformly cooled.
[0056] In addition, even in the case where a steel plate or sheet having a warped leading
end or trailing end was cooled, the problem that the steel plate or sheet 10 collides
with the upper header 21 and damages the upper header 21, or that the steel plate
or sheet 10 becomes immobilized, thereby causing a stoppage of the manufacture line
or a decline in the yield rate did not occur. Accordingly, a lifting system for preventing
the steel plate or sheet 10 from colliding with the upper header 21 was not necessary,
whereby the equipment cost could be reduced.
[0057] Further, because controlled rolling could be performed without 30-second air-cooling,
and because the transportation distance of a steel plate or sheet in four passes before
conducting controlled rolling was almost the same as in Comparative Example 1, a rolling
pitch was 180 seconds, which is 6 seconds shorter than in Comparative Example 2.
[0058] Further, because the cooling water 24 and the cooling water 34 having been supplied
onto the steel plate or sheet 10 contacted the surfaces of the work rolls 12a and
cooled the work rolls 12a, an additional cooling system for cooling the rolls was
not necessary. Accordingly, the equipment cost could be reduced.
Example 2
[0059] As Example 2 of the present invention, rough rolling of a steel sheet in a hot rolling
line was conducted. A slab was rolled down to a thickness of 42 mm by a roughing mill.
[0060] At that time, using a hot rolling mill shown in the above-described embodiment (FIG.
1) as Example 2 of the present invention, the steel plate or sheet 10 was rolled through
three passes in the rough rolling while being cooled by jetting the rod-like water
flows from the cooling equipment 20 provided on the entrance side and the exit side
of the rolling mill 12. The angle of depression θ
U of the upper nozzles 22 was set at 45°, and the angle of elevation θ
L of the lower nozzles 32 was set at 60°.
[0061] The inside diameters of the upper nozzles 22 and the lower nozzles 32 were set to
6 mm, and the jet velocity of the rod-like water flows was set to 8 m/s.
[0062] On the other hand, as Comparative Example 3, using a hot rolling mill having no cooling
equipment for cooling a steel plate or sheet during rolling, rough rolling was conducted.
When the slab was heated at a relatively high temperature, the temperature thereof
after the rough rolling was high. Therefore, 15-second air-cooling was performed at
the entrance side of the finishing mill to suppress formation of scale defects.
[0063] Further, as Comparative Example 4, using a hot rolling mill having cooling equipment
disclosed in the above-described Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No.
62-260022 instead of the cooling equipment 20 of Example 2 of the present invention, rough
rolling was conducted in the same manner as Example 2 of the present invention. That
is, a steel plate or sheet was rolled through three passes in the rough rolling while
being cooled by a laminar water flow jetted from the slit-shaped nozzle. The header
was installed such that the distance between the roll bite of the work rolls and the
cooling-start position (a position from where cooling by the cooling water starts)
was 4 m. Cooling was performed on the steel plate or sheet that is being conveyed.
[0064] The result is shown in Table 2. In Table 2, × denotes a case where a decline in productivity
or quality occurred, and ○ denotes a case where a decline in productivity or quality
did not occur.
Table 2
| |
Distance to the Cooling-start Position (*) |
Method of Supplying Cooling Water |
Equipment Cost |
Damage to Equipment |
Effect of Cooling Rolls |
Rolling Pitch |
Yield Rate |
| Comparative Example 3 |
no cooling equipment |
- |
- |
- |
× no |
105 s |
reference |
| Comparative Example 4 |
4 m |
laminar water flow |
× high |
× frequently occurred |
× no |
93 s |
10% decline |
| Example 2 of the Present Invention |
0 m |
rod-like water flow |
○ low |
○ no |
○ yes |
90 s |
equal to Comparative Example 3 |
| *Distance from the roll bite of the work rolls to the cooling-start position |
[0065] As shown in Table 2, in Comparative Example 3, because 15-second air-cooling was
performed at the entrance side of the finishing mill when the slab was heated at a
relatively high temperature, a rolling pitch was 105 seconds. This shows a decline
in the rolling efficiency.
[0066] In Comparative Example 4, because the lifting equipment had to be installed, the
equipment cost was high. Further, steel plates or sheets having a warped leading end
often collided with the nozzle units and damaged the equipment. The steel plates or
sheets that had damaged the equipment were deformed and unable to become finished
products. Thus, the yield rate declined as much as by 10%. Although 15-second air-cooling
at the entrance side of the finishing mill was not necessary, an increase in transportation
distance of a steel plate or sheet increased the transportation time. Thus, in total,
a rolling pitch was 93 seconds, which is 12 seconds shorter than in Comparative Example
3.
[0067] In both Comparative Examples 3 and 4, an additional cooling system for cooling the
work rolls was required, and the equipment cost therefor was needed.
[0068] In contrast, in Example 2 of the present invention, the remaining water 24 was retained
between the work rolls 12a and the rod-like water flows 23, whereby a stabilized cooling
area was formed. This eliminated the problem that the remaining water 24 randomly
moves over the steel plate or sheet 10 to nonuniformly cool the steel plate or sheet
10, thereby causing a temperature deviation. Thus, the steel plate or sheet 10 could
be uniformly cooled. This could properly suppress formation of scale defects.
[0069] In addition, in the case where a steel plate or sheet having a warped leading end
or trailing end was cooled, the problem that the steel plate or sheet 10 collides
with the upper header 21 and damages the upper header 21, or that the steel plate
or sheet 10 becomes immobilized, thereby causing a stoppage of the manufacture line
or a decline in the yield rate did not occur. Accordingly, the lifting system for
preventing the steel plate or sheet 10 from colliding with the upper header 21 was
not necessary, whereby the equipment cost could be reduced.
[0070] Further, because rough rolling could be performed without 15-second air-cooling at
the entrance side of the finishing mill, and because the transportation distance of
a steel plate or sheet when cooled by the cooling equipment 20 was almost the same
as in Comparative Example 3, a rolling pitch was 90 seconds, which is 3 seconds shorter
than in Comparative Example 4.
[0071] Further, because the cooling water 24 and the cooling water 34 having been supplied
onto the steel plate or sheet 10 contacted the surfaces of the work rolls 12a and
cooled the work rolls 12a, an additional cooling system for cooling the rolls was
not necessary. Accordingly, the equipment cost could be reduced.
Example 3
[0072] As Example 3 of the present invention, finish rolling of a steel sheet in a hot rolling
line was conducted. Using a finishing mill including seven stands, namely, F1 to F7,
a steel sheet was rolled down to a finished thickness of 3 mm.
[0073] At that time, using a hot finishing mill shown in the above-described embodiment
(FIG. 2) as Example 3 of the present invention, the steel plate or sheet 10 was rolled
through four stands, namely, F4 to F7, while being cooled by jetting the rod-like
water flows from the cooling equipment 20 provided on the exit side of the rolling
mill 12. The angle of depression θ
U of the upper nozzles 22 was set at 45°, and the angle of elevation θ
L of the lower nozzles 32 was set at 60°.
[0074] The inside diameters of the upper nozzles 22 and the lower nozzles 32 were set to
6 mm, and the jet velocity of the rod-like water flows was set to 8 m/s.
[0075] On the other hand, as Comparative Example 5, using a hot rolling mill having cooling
equipment as disclosed in the above-described Japanese Unexamined Patent Application
Publication No.
2002-361315 instead of the cooling equipment 20 of Example 3 of the present invention, finish
rolling was conducted in the same manner as Example 3 of the present invention. That
is, a steel plate or sheet was rolled through four stands, namely, F4 to F7, while
being cooled by a laminar water flow jetted from the slit-shaped nozzle. The header
was installed such that the distance between the roll bite of the work rolls and the
cooling-start position (a position from where cooling by the cooling water starts)
was 2 m.
[0076] Further, as Comparative Example 6, using a hot rolling mill having cooling equipment
as disclosed in the above-described Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No.
62-260022 instead of the cooling equipment 20 of Example 3 of the present invention, finish
rolling was conducted in the same manner as Example 3 of the present invention. That
is, a steel plate or sheet was rolled through four stands, namely, F4 to F7, while
being cooled by a laminar water flow jetted from the slit-shaped nozzle. The header
was installed such that the distance between the roll bite of the work rolls and the
cooling-start position (a position from where cooling by the cooling water starts)
was 2 m.
[0077] The result is shown in Table 3. In Table 3, × denotes a case where a decline in productivity
or quality occurred, and ○ denotes a case where a decline in productivity or quality
did not occur.
Table 3
| |
Distance to the Cooling-start Position (*) |
Method of Supplying Cooling Water |
Equipment Cost |
Occurrence of Temperature Deviation due to Remaining Water |
Variation in Quality of Products |
Damage to Equipment |
Manufacture Thinscale Steel Sheet |
I Effect of Cooling Rolls |
Yield Rate |
| Comparative Example 5 |
2 m |
laminar water flow |
× high |
× yes |
× yes |
○ no |
× impossible |
× no |
reference |
| Comparative Example 6 |
2 m |
laminar water flow |
× high |
○ no |
○ no |
× frequently occurred |
× impossible |
× no |
10% decline |
| Example 3 of the Present Invention |
0 m |
rod-like water flow |
○ low |
○ no |
○ no |
○ no |
○ possible |
○ yes |
equal to Comparative Example 5 |
| *Distance from the roll bite of the work rolls to the cooling-start position |
[0078] As shown in Table 3, in Comparative Example 5, a change in state of the cooling water
remained on the top surface of the steel plate or sheet caused a change in the cooling
area of the steel plate or sheet, whereby a temperature deviation increased. This
increased variations in quality (strength), such as tensile strength, of products
(the difference between the maximum strength and the minimum strength: 3 kg/mm
2 or larger), resulting in a failure to manufacture a high quality steel plate or sheet.
[0079] In Comparative Example 6, because the lifting equipment had to be installed, the
equipment cost was high. Further, steel plates or sheets having a warped leading end
often collided with the nozzle units and damaged the equipment. The steel plates or
sheets that had damaged the equipment were deformed and unable to become finished
products. Thus, the yield rate declined as much as by 10%.
[0080] In both Comparative Examples 5 and 6, because the header was installed at a position
2 m away from the work rolls, scale formation on a steel plate or sheet that has just
left the roll bite could not be suppressed. Accordingly, a thin-scale steel sheet
could not be manufactured.
[0081] In both Comparative Examples 5 and 6, an additional cooling system for cooling the
work rolls was required, and the equipment cost therefor was needed.
[0082] In contrast, in Example 3 of the present invention, the remaining water 24 was retained
between the work rolls 12a and the rod-like water flows 23, whereby a stabilized cooling
area was formed. This eliminated the problem that the remaining water 24 randomly
moves over the steel plate or sheet 10 to nonuniformly cool the steel plate or sheet
10, thereby causing a temperature deviation. Thus, the steel plate or sheet 10 could
be uniformly cooled. This enabled to manufacture a high quality steel plate or sheet
having little variations in quality, such as tensile strength, (the difference between
the maximum strength and the minimum strength: 1 kg/mm
2 or smaller).
[0083] Even when a steel plate or sheet whose leading end or trailing end is warped is cooled,
the steel plate or sheet 10 did not collide with and damage the upper header 21 nor
become immovable. Thus, a stoppage of the manufacturing line or a lowering of the
yield rate could be avoided. This eliminated the necessity to provide a lifting system
for preventing the steel plate or sheet 10 from colliding with the upper header 21,
whereby the equipment cost could be reduced.
[0084] Further, because the temperature of the surfaces of the steel plate or sheet 10 that
has just left the roll bite of the rolling mill 12 could be reduced by supplying cooling
water onto the steel plate or sheet 10, scale formation could be suppressed. Accordingly,
a thin-scale steel sheet could be manufactured.
[0085] Further, because the cooling water 24 and the cooling water 34 having been supplied
onto the steel plate or sheet 10 contacted the surfaces of the work rolls 12a and
cooled the work rolls 12a, an additional cooling system for cooling the rolls was
not necessary. Accordingly, the equipment cost could be reduced.