|
(11) | EP 2 112 251 B1 |
| (12) | EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
|
|
| (54) |
SURFACE PRETREATMENT FLUID FOR THE METAL TO BE COATED BY CATIONIC ELECTRODEPOSITION OBERFLÄCHENVORBEHANDLUNGSFLUID FÜR DAS DURCH KATIONISCHE ELEKTROTAUCHLACKIERUNG ZU BESCHICHTENDE METALL FLUIDE DE PRÉTRAITEMENT DE SURFACE POUR UN MÉTAL DEVANT ÊTRE REVÊTU PAR ÉLECTRODÉPOSITION CATIONIQUE |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention). |
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to a metal surface treatment liquid, particularly to a metal surface treatment liquid suited for cation electrodeposition coating, and a method of metal surface treatment.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] In order to impart anti-corrosion properties to various metal base materials, surface treatments have thus far been performed. Particularly, a zinc phosphate treatment has been generally employed on metal base materials which constitute automobiles. However, this zinc phosphate treatment has a problem of sludge generation as a by-product. Accordingly, a surface treatment without use of zinc phosphate for a next generation has been demanded, and a surface treatment with zirconium ions is one of such treatments (see, for example, Patent Document 1).
[0003] Meanwhile, metal base materials which constitute automobiles and necessitate high anti-corrosion properties are subjected to cation electrodeposition coating following the surface treatment. The cation electrodeposition coating is carried out on the grounds that the coated film obtained by cation electrodeposition coating has superior anti-corrosion properties, and it has "throwing power", generally referred to, that is a property of allowing automobile bodies having a complicated shape to be completely coated.
[0004] However, it has been recently proven that when a metal base material which had been surface treated with the zirconium ions is subjected to the cation electrodeposition coating, there may be a case in which no significant effect in terms of the throwing power is achieved, for example, the throwing power may not be sufficient for cold-rolled steel plates in some cases. Accordingly, when the cation electrodeposition coating is carried out, sufficient anti-corrosion properties cannot be achieved if the throwing power is insufficient.
[0006] US 2003/230364 and WO2006/050915 disclose coating with solutions containing Zr, Sn and F followed by a cation electrodeposited coating.
[0007] EP 1 997 936 A1 teaches a metal surface treatment composition containing zirconium and/or titanium compound and a polycondensate of organosilane. WO 93/12268 A1 discloses a bath for improving the corrosion resistance and paint adherence of a tin-plated steel surface comprising phosphate, fluoride and tin. WO 95/02077 A1 covers aqueous liquid compositions on the base of water, dissolved zirconium or titanium compound, oxidizing agent, fluorine, dissolved phosphate anions, complexing organic acid and dissolved ions of Al and Sn for aluminium or tinplate cans. EP 1 992 718 A1 teaches a surface treating agent for metal comprising (a) a fluorine compound of Zr, Ti and/or Hf, (b) Cr3+ ion, (c) ions of Fe, Co, Zn, Mn, Mg, Ca, Sr, AI, Sn, Ce, Mo, W, Nb, Y and/or La as well as (d) a compound with an amidino group.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
Problems to be solved by the Invention
[0008] An object of the present invention is to provide a surface treatment with zirconium ions that enables sufficient throwing power and exhibit superior anti-corrosion properties to be exhibited, when thus surface treated metal base material is subjected to cation electrodeposition coating.
Means for Solving the Problems
[0009] The problem is solved with a metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating comprising zirconium ions and tin ions, and having a pH of 1.5 to 6.5, wherein:
a concentration of zirconium ions is in the range of 10 to 10,000 ppm; and
a concentration ratio of the tin ions to the zirconium ions is in the range of 0.005 to 1 on a mass basis,
comprising fluorine ions and:
- A) a chelate compound, wherein the chelate compound is selected from the group consisting of amino acid, aminocarboxylic acid, aromatic carboxylic acid, ascorbic acid and sulfonic acid, wherein the sulfonic acid is selected from the group consisting of methanesulfonic acid, isethionic acid, taurine, naphthalenedisulfonic acid, aminonaphthalenedisulfonic acid, sulfosalicylic acid, a naphthalenesulfonic acid-formaldehyde condensate, alkylnaphthalenesulfonic acid, a salt of any of these and sodium polystyrenesulfonate; or
- B) a nitrogenous, sulfur and/or a phenolic rust-preventive agent selected from the group consisting of hydroquinone, ethyleneurea, quinolinol, thiourea, benzotriazole, a salt of any of these and mercaptobenzothiazole; or
- C) indium ions,
[0010] The problem is further on solved with a method of metal surface treatment comprising a step of subjecting a metal base material to a surface treatment with the metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating according to the invention and with a metal base material comprising a coating film formed by a surface treatment obtained by the method according to the invention.
Effects of the Invention
[0012] It is believed that the throwing power attained by the metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention can be improved by including tin ions in addition to zirconium ions when the cation electrodeposition coating is carried out after forming a conversion coating film with this treatment liquid. Although not clarified, the grounds are conceived as follows.
[0013] When zirconium ions are used alone, formation of their oxide coating film is believed to be executed simultaneously with etching of the metal base material in an acidic medium. However, since segregation materials and the like of compounds containing silicon or carbon in addition to silica may be present on cold-rolled steel plates, such parts are not susceptible to etching. Therefore, the coating film cannot be uniformly formed with zirconium oxide, whereby portions without coating film formation can be present. Since a difference in electric current flow is believed to be generated between the parts with and without formation of the coating film, the electrodeposition is not uniformly executed, and consequently, the throwing power cannot be sufficiently attained.
[0014] When tin ions are additionally present, it is further considered as in the following. Since the tin ions are less likely to be affected on the steel plate as compared with the zirconium ions, their oxide coating film can be more easily formed on the base material. Although formation of the coating film of the tin ions is not specific to the parts where the zirconium ions are not significantly deposited, formation of the oxide coating film of the tin ions is not restricted to a specific part while having another part remain without formation of the film. As a result, the tin ions would form the coating film such that it covers the part where the zirconium ion could not form the coating film.
[0015] The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention can improve adhesiveness to the coated film by cation electrodeposition through including the polyamine compound, and consequently, it can pass SDT test under more stringent conditions. In addition, the metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention can improve anti-corrosion properties by including the copper ion. Although the grounds are not clarified, it is believed that some interaction may be caused between copper and zirconium in forming the coating film. Furthermore, the metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention can form a zirconium oxide coating film in a stable manner by including a chelate compound when a metal other than zirconium is included in large quantity. This occurrence is believed to result from capture by the chelate compound of metal ions that are more likely to be deposited than zirconium.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016]
Fig. 1 shows a perspective view illustrating one example of the box for use in evaluating the throwing power; and
Fig. 2 shows a view schematically illustrating evaluation of the throwing power.
PREFERRED MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0017] The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention is a chemical conversion treatment liquid that contains zirconium ions and tin ions, and has a pH in the range of 1.5 to 6.5.
[0018] The zirconium ions are included at a concentration in a range of 10 to 10,000 ppm. When the concentration is less than 10 ppm, sufficient anti-corrosion properties cannot be achieved since deposition of the zirconium coating film is not enough. In addition, even though the concentration may exceed 10,000 ppm, an effect to justify the amount cannot be exhibited since the deposition amount of the zirconium coated film is not increased, and adhesiveness of the coated film may be deteriorated, thereby leading to inferior anticorrosion performance such as those in SDT. The lower limit and the upper limit of the concentration are preferably 100 ppm and 500 ppm, respectively.
[0019] The concentration of the metal ions herein, when a complex or oxide thereof was formed, is represented by the concentration based on the metal element, taking into account only of the metal atom in the complex or oxide. For example, the concentration based on the metal element of zirconium of 100 ppm complex ions ZrF62- (molecular weight: 205) is calculated to be 44 ppm by the formula of 100 x (91/205). In the metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention, the metal compound (zirconium compound, tin compound, copper compound and other metal compounds) is included at just a slight proportion, if present, in the state of a nonionic state such as an oxide portion, and is believed to be present almost in the form of the metal ion. Therefore, the metal ion concentration referred to herein is, irrespective of the presence in the form of the nonionic portion, the metal ion concentration when it is assumed to be present as the metal ion dissociated at a level of 100%.
[0020] The tin ion included in the metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention is preferably a bivalent cation. When the tin ion has other valence, the intended effect may not be exhibited. However, the tin ion is not limited to the bivalent cation, but can be used in the present invention as long as it can be deposited on the metal base material. For example, when the tin ions form a complex, it may be a quadrivalent cation, which can also be used in the present invention. The concentration of the tin ions is 0.005 to 1 on a mass basis with respect to the concentration of the zirconium ions. When the ratio is less than 0.005, the effect by addition is not exhibited, while zirconium may not be significantly deposited when the ratio exceeds 1. The lower limit and the upper limit of the concentration are preferably 0.02 and 0.2, respectively. However, when the total amount of the zirconium ion and tin ion is too small, the effect of the present invention may not be exhibited. Therefore, the total concentration of the zirconium ion and the tin ion in the metal surface treatment liquid of the present invention is preferably no less than 15 ppm.
[0021] The content of the tin ions in the metal surface treatment liquid of the present invention is preferably is preferably 1 to 100 ppm. When the content is less than 1 ppm, deposition of tin at the portion where zirconium could not form the coating film may be insufficient, and the anti-corrosion properties such as those in SDT are likely to be inferior. When the content exceeds 100 ppm, deposition of the zirconium coating film may be difficult, whereby the anti-corrosion properties and the coating appearance are likely to be inferior. The concentration is more preferably 5 to 100 ppm, and still more preferably 5 to 50 ppm.
[0022] The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention has a pH in the range of 1.5 to 6.5. When the pH is less than 1.5, the metal base material cannot be sufficiently etched to decrease the coating film amount, and sufficient anti-corrosion properties cannot be achieved. In addition, the stability of the treatment liquid may not be sufficient. In contrast, when the pH is higher than 6.5, excessive etching may lead to failure in formation of sufficient coating film, or an un-uniform adhesion amount and film thickness of the coating film may adversely affect the coating appearance and the like. The lower limit and the upper limit of pH are preferably 2.0 and 5.5, and still more preferably 2.5 and 5.0, respectively.
[0023] The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention may further include a polyamine compound for improving adhesiveness to the coated film by cation electrodeposition which is formed after the surface treatment. The polyamine compound used in the present invention is believed to be fundamentally significant in being an organic molecule having an amino group. Although speculative, the amino group is believed to be incorporated in the coating film by a chemical action with zirconium oxide deposited as a coating film on the metal base plate, or with the metal base plate. In addition, the polyamine compound that is an organic molecule is believed to be responsible for adhesiveness with the coated film provided on the metal base plate having the coating film formed thereon. Therefore, when the polyamine compound that is an organic molecule having an amino group is used, adhesiveness between the metal base plate and the coated film is significantly improved, and superior corrosion resistance can be attained. Examples of the polyamine compound include hydrolysis condensates of aminosilane, polyvinylamine, polyallylamine, water soluble phenolic resins having an amino group, and the like. Since the amount of amine can be freely adjusted, the hydrolysis condensate of aminosilane is preferred. Therefore, exemplary metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention include, for example, the metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating which contain zirconium ions, tin ions, and a hydrolysis condensate of aminosilane; the metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating which contain zirconium ions, tin ions, and polyallylamine; and the metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating which contain zirconium ions, tin ions, and a water soluble phenolic resin having an amino group. In addition, these metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating may contain fluorine as described later.
[0024] The hydrolysis condensate of aminosilane is obtained by carrying out hydrolysis condensation of an aminosilane compound. Examples of the aminosilane compound include vinyltrichlorosilane, vinyltrimethoxysilane, vinyltriethoxysilane, 2-(3,4 epoxycyclohexyl)-ethyltrimethoxysilane, 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane, 3-glycidoxypropylmethyldiethoxysilane, 3-glycidoxypropyltriethoxysilane, p-styryltrimethoxysilane, 3-methacryloxypropylmethyldimethoxysilane, 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, 3-methacryloxypropylmethyldiethoxysilane, 3-methacryloxypropyltriethoxysilane, 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, N-2-(aminoethyl)-3-aminopropylmethyldimethoxysilane, N-2-(aminoethyl)-3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane, N-2-(aminoethyl)-3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, 3-triethoxysilyl-N-(1,3-dimethylbutylidene)-propylamine, N-phenyl-3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane, N-(vinylbenzyl)-2-aminoethyl-3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane hydrochloride, 3-ureidepropyltriethoxysilane, 3-chloropropyltrimethoxysilane, 3-mercaptopropylmethyldimethoxysilane, 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane, bis(triethoxysilylpropyl)tetrasulfide, and 3-isocyanate propyltriethoxysilane, which are silane coupling agents having an amino group. In addition, examples of commercially available products which can be used include "KBM-403", "KBM-602", "KBM-603", "KBE-603", "KBM-903", "KBE-903", "KBE-9103", "KBM-573", "KBP-90" (all trade names, manufactured by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co.,), "XS1003" (trade name, manufactured by Chisso Corporation), and the like.
[0025] The hydrolytic condensation of the aforementioned aminosilane can be carried out by a method well known to persons skilled in the art. Specifically, the hydrolytic condensation can be carried out by adding water required for hydrolysis of the alkoxysilyl group to at least one kind of aminosilane compound, and stirring the mixture while heating as needed. The degree of condensation can be regulated with the amount of water used.
[0026] A higher degree of condensation of aminosilane hydrolysis condensate is preferred, since in this case where zirconium is deposited as an oxide, the above aminosilane hydrolysis condensate tends to be easily incorporated therein. For example, the portion on a mass basis of dimer or higher-order multimers of aminosilane in the total amount of the aminosilane is preferably no less than 40%, more preferably no less than 50%, still more preferably no less than 70%, and even more preferably no less than 80%. Therefore, when aminosilane is allowed to react in a hydrolytic condensation reaction, it is preferred to permit the reaction under conditions in which aminosilane is more likely to be hydrolysed and condensed such as those in which an aqueous solvent containing a catalyst such as acetic acid and alcohol is used as the solvent. In addition, by allowing for a reaction under conditions with a comparatively high aminosilane concentration, a hydrolysis condensate having a high degree of condensation is obtained. Specifically, it is preferred to allow for the hydrolytic condensation at an aminosilane concentration falling within the range of 5% by mass to 50% by mass. The degree of condensation can be determined by 29Si-NMR measurement.
[0027] As the polyvinylamine and polyallylamine, commercially available products can be used. Examples of polyvinylamine include "PVAM-0595B" (trade name, manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation) and the like, and examples of the polyallylamine include "PAA-01", "PAA-10C", "PAA-H-10C", "PAA-D-41HCl" (all trade names, manufactured by Nitto Boseki Co., Ltd.) and the like.
[0028] The molecular weight of the polyamine compound is preferably in the range of 150 to 500,000. When the molecular weight is less than 150, a conversion coating film having sufficient adhesiveness may not be obtained. When the molecular weight exceeds 500,000, formation of the coating film may be inhibited. The lower limit and the upper limit are more preferably 5,000 and 70,000, respectively. When the polyamine compound has the amino group in too large an amount, it may adversely influence the coating film, while the effect to improve the adhesiveness with the coating film provided by the amino group is not significantly achieved when the amount is too small. Therefore, the polyamine compound preferably has a primary and/or secondary amino group of no less than 0.1 mmol and no more than 17 mmol per gram of the solid content, and more preferably a primary and/or secondary amino group of no less than 3 mmol and no more than 15 mmol per gram of the solid content.
[0029] The number of moles of the primary and/or secondary amino group per gram of the solid content of the polyamine compound can be determined according to the following formula (1).
in which the mass ratio of solid contents of the polyamine compound and the compound having a functional group A and/or a functional group B is defined as m:n; the number of mmoles of the functional group A and/or the functional group B per gram of the compound having the functional group A and/or the functional group B is defined as Y; and the number of mmoles of the primary and/or secondary amino group included per gram of the polyamine compound when the compound having the functional group A and/or the functional group B is not included in the composition for the metal surface treatment is defined as X.
[0030] The content of the polyamine compound in the metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention can be in the range of 1 to 200% based on mass of the zirconium metal included in the surface treatment liquid. When the content is less than 1%, the intended effect cannot be exhibited, while the content exceeding 200% may lead to failure in sufficient formation of the coating film. The upper limit of the content is more preferably 120%, more preferably 100%, still more preferably 80%, and even more preferably 60%.
[0031] The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention may further contain a copper ion for improving the anti-corrosion properties. With respect to the amount of the copper ions, the concentration preferably accounts for 10 to 100% with respect to the concentration of the tin ions. When the concentration is less than 10%, the intended effect may not be exhibited, while deposition of zirconium may be difficult, similarly to the case of the tin ions when it exceeds the concentration of the tin ions. Exemplary metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention include, for example, the metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating which contain zirconium ions, tin ions and copper ions. In this case, the fluorine ions described later can be further included and the aforementioned polyamine compound can be included.
[0032] The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention contains fluorine ions. Since the concentration of the fluorine ions varies depending on the pH, the amount of free fluorine ions is defined at a specified pH. In the present invention, the amount of the free fluorine ions at a pH of 3.0 is in the range of 0.1 to 50 ppm. When the amount is less than 0.1 ppm, the metal base material cannot be sufficiently etched so that the coating film amount is decreased, and sufficient anticorrosion properties cannot be achieved. In addition, the treatment liquid may not have enough stability. In contrast, when the amount is above 50 ppm, excessive etching may lead to failure in formation of sufficient coating film, or an un-uniform adhesion amount and film thickness of the coating film may adversely affect the coating appearance and the like. The lower limit and the upper limit are preferably 0.5 ppm and 10 ppm, respectively. Exemplary metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention include, for example, the metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating which contain zirconium ions, tin ions, and fluorine ions.
[0033] The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention may include a chelate compound. By including the chelate compound, deposition of metals other than zirconium can be suppressed in the treatment liquid, and the coating film of zirconium oxide can be stably formed. As the chelate compound, amino acid, aminocarboxylic acid, aromatic carboxylic acid, sulfonic acid, ascorbic acid can be used. Carboxylic acid having a hydroxyl group such as citric acid and gluconic acid, conventionally known as chelating agents, cannot exert their function enough in the present invention.
[0034] As the amino acid, a variety of naturally occurring amino acids and synthetic amino acids, as well as amino acids having at least one amino group and at least one acid group (carboxyl group, sulfonic acid group or the like) in one molecule, can be extensively utilized. Among these, at least one selected from the group consisting of alanine, glycine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, histidine, phenylalanine, asparagine, arginine, glutamine, cysteine, leucine, lysine, proline, serine, tryptophan, valine and tyrosine, and a salt thereof can be preferably used. Furthermore, when there is an optical isomer of the amino acid, any one can be suitably used irrespective of the forms, i.e., L-form, D-form, or racemic bodies.
[0035] In addition, as the aminocarboxylic acid, a compound having both functional groups, an amino group and a carboxyl group in one molecule other than the amino acid described above can be extensively used. Among these, at least one selected from the group consisting of diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), hydroxyethylethylenediamine triacetic acid (HEDTA), triethylenetetraamine hexaacetic acid (TTHA), 1,3-propanediamine tetraacetic acid (PDTA), 1,3-diamino-6-hydroxypropane tetraacetic acid (DPTA-OH), hydroxyethylimino diacetic acid (HIDA), dihydroxyethylglycine (DHEG), glycolether diamine tetraacetic acid (GEDTA), dicarboxymethyl glutamic acid (CMGA), (S,S)-ethylenediamine disuccinic acid (EDDS), ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), and a salt thereof can be preferably used.
[0036] As the sulfonic acid, at least one selected from the group consisting of methanesulfonic acid, isethionic acid, taurine, naphthalenedisulfonic acid, aminonaphthalenedisulfonic acid, sulfosalicylic acid, a naphthalenesulfonic acid-formaldehyde condensate, alkylnaphthalenesulfonic acid, and a salt thereof can be preferably used.
[0037] When sulfonic acid is used, coating performance and corrosion resistance of the object following the chemical conversion treatment can be improved. Although the mechanism is not clarified, the following grounds are conceived.
[0038] First, since there exist silica segregation products and the like on the surface of the object such as steel plates to yield an un-uniform surface composition, a portion not susceptible to etching in the chemical conversion treatment may be present. However, it is speculated that such a portion not susceptible to etching can be particularly etched by adding sulfonic acid, and consequently, a uniform metal oxide film is likely to be formed on the object surface. In other words, sulfonic acid is believed to act as an etching accelerator.
[0039] Second, it is possible that in chemical conversion treatment, hydrogen gas which can be generated by the chemical conversion reaction inhibits the reaction at the interface, and sulfonic acid is speculated to remove the hydrogen gas through a depolarizing action thereby accelerating the reaction.
[0040] Of these, use of taurine is preferred since it has both an amino group and a sulfone group. The content of sulfonic acid is preferably in the range of 0.1 to 10,000 ppm, and more preferably in the range of 1 to 1,000 ppm. When the content is less than 0.1 ppm, the effect is not significantly exhibited, while deposition of zirconium can be inhibited when the content exceeds 10,000 ppm.
[0041] Use of ascorbic acid leads to uniform formation of the metal oxide film such as zirconium oxide, tin oxide and the like on the object surface by the chemical conversion treatment, and the coating performance and corrosion resistance can be improved. Although the mechanism is not clarified, the etching action in the chemical conversion treatment is uniformly executed on the object such as steel plates, and consequently, it is speculated that zirconium oxide and/or tin oxide is deposited on the etched part to form an entirely uniform metal oxide film. In addition, tin is speculated to become apt to be deposited in the form of the tin metal at the metal interface due to some influence, and as a consequence, zirconium oxide is deposited at the part where the tin metal deposited, whereby surface concealability on the object may be improved as a whole. The content of ascorbic acid is preferably in the range of 5 to 5,000 ppm, and more preferably in the range of 20 to 200 ppm. When the content is less than 5 ppm, the effect is not significantly exhibited, while deposition of zirconium can be inhibited when the content exceeds 5,000 ppm.
[0042] When the chelating agent is included, its content is preferably 0.5 to 10 times the concentration of the total concentration of other metal ions except for zirconium such as tin ion and copper ion. When the concentration is less than 0.5 times, the intended effect cannot be exhibited, while a concentration exceeding 10 times may adversely influence on formation of the coating film.
[0043] The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention can further contain a nitrogenous, sulfur and/or a phenolic rust-preventive agent. The rust-preventive agent can inhibit corrosion through forming an anti-corrosion coating film on the metal surface. As the nitrogenous, sulfurous, phenolic rust-preventive agent, at least one selected from the group consisting of hydroquinone, ethyleneurea, quinolinol, thioures, benzotriazole, and a salt thereof can be used. Use of the nitrogenous, sulfurous, phenolic rust-preventive agent in the metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention leads to uniform formation of the metal oxide film such as zirconium oxide, tin oxide and the like on the object surface by the chemical conversion treatment, whereby the coating performance, corrosion resistance can be improved. Although the mechanism is not clarified, the followings are conceived.
[0044] That is, since there exist silica segregation products and the like on the steel plate surface to yield an un-uniform surface composition, a portion having the conversion coating film formed by etching in the chemical conversion treatment, and a portion without formation of the conversion coating film due to different etching behavior thereby having iron oxide may be present. The nitrogenous, sulfurous, phenolic rust-preventive agent improves primary rust-preventive properties through adsorbing to the portion without formation of the conversion coating film in the chemical conversion treatment to cover the metal interface. It is speculated that the coating performance, corrosion resistance of the object following the chemical conversion treatment can be consequently improved.
[0045] In addition, when copper is excessively deposited on the conversion coating film, this copper may serve as a cathode base point to form an electrically un-uniform conversion coating film. However, by allowing the rust-preventive agent to be adsorbed to the portion where an excessive amount of copper deposited, improvement of the corrosion resistance is expected to be enabled by attaining a uniform electrodeposition coating property on the object following the chemical conversion treatment.
[0046] The content of the nitrogenous, sulfurous and/or phenolic rust-preventive agent is preferably in the range of 0.1 to 10,000 ppm, and more preferably in the range of 1 to 1,000 ppm. When the content is less than 0.1 ppm, the effect is not significantly exhibited, while deposition of zirconium can be inhibited when the content exceeds 10,000 ppm.
[0047] The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention may further contain aluminum ions and/or indium ions. Since these cations have similar functions to the tin ions, they can be used in combination when the use of the tin ions alone cannot exhibit the effect. Of these, aluminum is more preferred. The content of the aluminum ions and/or the indium ions is preferably in the range of 10 to 1,000 ppm, more preferably in the range of 50 to 500 ppm, and still more preferably in the range of 100 to 300 ppm. The amount of the aluminum ions and indium ions can be a concentration accounting for, for example, 2 to 1,000% of the zirconium ion concentration. Exemplary metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention include, for example, the metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating which contain zirconium ions, tin ions and aluminum ions. These can further contain fluorine as described later, and can also contain the polyamine compound described later.
[0048] The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention may contain various cations in addition to the aforementioned components. Examples of the cation include magnesium, zinc, calcium, gallium, iron, manganese, nickel, cobalt, silver, and the like. In addition, there exist cations and anions that are derived from a base or an acid added for adjusting the pH, or are included as the counter ion of the aforementioned components.
[0049] The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention can be produced by placing each of the components thereof, and/or compound containing the same into water, followed by mixing.
[0050] Examples of the compound for supplying the zirconium ions include fluorozirconic acid, salts of fluorozirconic acid such as potassium fluorozirconate and ammonium fluorozirconate, zirconium fluoride, zirconium oxide, zirconium oxide colloid, zirconyl nitrate, zirconium carbonate, and the like.
[0051] Examples of the compound that supplies the tin ions include tin sulfate, tin acetate, tin fluoride, tin chloride, tin nitrate, and the like. On the other hand, as the compound that supplies the fluorine ions, for example, fluorides such as hydrofluoric acid, ammonium fluoride, fluoboric acid, ammonium hydrogen fluoride, sodium fluoride, sodium hydrogen fluoride, and the like can be exemplified. Additionally, a complex fluoride can also be used as the source, and examples thereof include hexafluorosilicic acid salts, specifically, hydrofluosilicic acid, zinc hydrofluosilicicate, manganese hydrofluosilicate, magnesium hydrofluosilicate, nickel hydrofluosilicate, iron hydrofluosilicate, calcium hydrofluosilicate, and the like. Furthermore, a compound that supplies zirconium ions, and is a complex fluoride is also acceptable. Moreover, copper acetate, copper nitrate, copper sulfate, copper chloride and the like as the compound that supplies copper ions; aluminum nitrate, aluminum fluoride and the like as the compound that supplies aluminum ions; and indium nitrate, indium chloride and the like as the compound that supplies indium ions can be exemplified, respectively.
[0052] After mixing these components, the metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention can be regulated to have a predetermined value of pH using an acidic compound such as nitric acid or sulfuric acid, and a basic compound such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide or ammonia.
The method of the metal surface treatment of the present invention includes a step of subjecting a metal base material to a surface treatment using the metal surface treatment liquid described above.
[0053] The metal base material is not particularly limited as long as it can be cation electrodeposited, and for example, an iron-based metal base material, aluminum-based metal base material, zinc-based metal base material and the like can be exemplified.
[0054] Examples of the iron-based metal base material include cold-rolled steel plates, hot-rolled steel plates, soft steel plates, high-tensile steel plates, and the like. Moreover, examples of the aluminum-based metal base material include 5,000 series aluminum alloys, 6,000 series aluminum alloys, and aluminum-coated steel plates treated by aluminum-based electroplating, hot dipping, or vapor deposition plating. Furthermore, examples of the zinc-based metal base material include zinc or zinc-based alloy coated steel plates treated by zinc-based electroplating, hot dipping, or vapor deposition plating such as zinc coated steel plate, zinc-nickel coated steel plate, zinc-titanium coated steel plate, zinc-magnesium coated steel plate, zinc-manganese coated steel plate, and the like. There are a variety of grades of the high-tensile steel plate depending on the strength and manufacture method, and examples thereof include JSC400J, JSC440P, JSC440W, JSC590R, JSC590T, JSC590Y, JSC780T, JSC780Y, JSC980Y, JSC1180Y, and the like.
[0055] Metal base materials including a combination of multiple kinds of metals such as iron-based, aluminum-based, zinc-based metals and the like (including joint area and contact area of different kinds of metals) can be simultaneously applied as the metal base material.
[0056] The surface treatment step may be carried out by bringing the metal surface treatment liquid into contact with the metal base material. Specific examples of the method include a dipping method, a spraying method, a roll coating method, a pouring method, and the like.
[0057] The treatment temperature in the surface treatment step preferably falls within the range of 20 to 70°C. When the temperature is lower than 20°C, it is possible to cause failure in formation of a sufficient coating film, while a corresponding effect cannot be expected at a temperature above 70°C. The lower limit and the upper limit are more preferably 30°C and 50°C, respectively.
[0058] The treatment time period in the surface treatment step is preferably 2 to 1100 seconds. When the time period is less than 2 seconds, a sufficient coating film amount may not be attained, while a corresponding effect cannot be expected even though it is longer than 1100 seconds. The lower limit and the upper limit are still more preferably 30 seconds and 120 seconds, respectively. Accordingly, a coating film is formed on the metal base material.
[0059] The surface treated metal base material of the present invention is obtained by the surface treatment method described above. On the surface of the metal base material is formed a coating film that contains zirconium and tin. The element ratio of zirconium/tin in the coating film is preferably in the range of 1/10 to 10/1 on a mass basis. When the ratio is out of this range, the intended performance may not be attained.
[0060] The content of zirconium in the coating film is preferably no less than 10 mg/m2 in the case of iron-based metal base materials. When the content is less than 10 mg/m2, sufficient anti-corrosion properties may not be achieved. The content is more preferably no less than 20 mg/m2, and still more preferably no less than 30 mg/m2. Although the upper limit is not specifically defined, too large an amount of the coating film may lead to an increased likelihood of crack generation of the rust-preventive coating film, and may make it difficult to obtain a uniform coating film. In this respect, the content of zirconium in the coating film is preferably no greater than 1 g/m2, and more preferably no greater than 800 mg/m2.
[0061] When the coating film is formed using the metal surface treatment liquid which contains copper ions, the content of copper in the coating film is preferably no less than 0.5 mg/m2 in order to achieve the intended effect.
[0062] The method of cation electrodeposition coating of the present invention includes a step of subjecting a metal base material to a surface treatment using the metal surface treatment liquid described above, and a step of subjecting the surface treated metal base material to cation electrodeposition coating.
[0063] The surface treatment step in the aforementioned cation electrodeposition coating is same as the surface treatment step in the surface treatment method described above. The surface treated metal base material obtained in the surface treatment step may be subjected to the cation electrodeposition coating step directly or after washing.
[0064] In the cation electrodeposition coating step, the surface treated metal base material is subjected to the cation electrodeposition coating. In the cation electrodeposition coating, the surface treated metal base material is dipped in cation electrodeposition coating solution, and a voltage of 50 to 450 V is applied thereto using the same as a cathode for a certain period of time. Although the application time period of voltage may vary depending on the conditions of the electrodeposition, it is generally 2 to 4 minutes.
[0065] As the cation electrodeposition coating solution, a generally well known one can be used. Specifically, such general coating solutions are prepared by blending: a binder cationized through adding amine or sulfide to an epoxy group carried by an epoxy resin or an acrylic resin, followed by adding thereto a neutralizing acid such as acetic acid; block isocyanate as a curing agent; and a pigment dispersing paste including a rust-preventive pigment dispersed in a resin.
[0066] After completing the cation electrodeposition coating step, a hardened coated film can be obtained by baking at a predetermined temperature directly, or after washing with water. Although the baking conditions may vary depending on the type of the cation electrodeposition coating solution used, usually the baking may be conducted in the range of 120 to 260°C, and preferably in the range of 140 to 220°C. The baking time period can be 10 to 30 minutes. The resulting metal base material coated by the cation electrodeposition is also involved as an aspect of the present invention.
EXAMPLES
Production Example 1: Production of Hydrolysis Condensate of Aminosilane, Part 1
[0067] As aminosilane, 5 parts by mass of KBE603 (3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, effective concentration: 100%, manufactured by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.) was added dropwise using a dropping funnel to a mixed solvent (solvent temperature: 25°C) containing 47.5 parts by mass of deionized water and 47.5 parts by mass of isopropyl alcohol over 60 minutes to a homogenous state, followed by allowing for reaction under a nitrogen atmosphere at 25°C for 24 hours. Then, the reaction solution was subjected to a reduced pressure to allow for evaporation of isopropyl alcohol, and deionized water was further added thereto, whereby a hydrolysis condensate of aminosilane including 5% of the active ingredient was obtained. Production Example 2: Production of Hydrolysis Condensate of Aminosilane, Part 2
[0068] In a similar manner to Production Example 1, except that the amounts were changed to 20 parts by mass of KBE603, 40 parts by mass of deionized water, and 40 parts by mass of isopropyl alcohol, a hydrolysis condensate of aminosilane including 20% of the active ingredient was obtained.
Example 1 - as a comparison example
[0069] A metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating was obtained by: mixing a 40% aqueous zircon acid solution as a zirconium ion source, tin sulfate as a tin ion source, and hydrofluoric acid; diluting the mixture so as to give a zirconium ion concentration of 500 ppm, and a tin ion concentration of 30 ppm; and adjusting the pH to 3.5 using nitric acid and sodium hydroxide. Measurement of free fluorine ion concentration using a fluorine ion meter after adjusting the pH of this treatment liquid to 3.0 revealed a value of 5 ppm.
Example 2 - as a comparison example
[0070] A metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that: the hydrolysis condensate of aminosilane obtained in Production Example 1 was further added to be 200 ppm; tin sulfate was changed to tin acetate so as to give the tin ion concentration of 10 ppm; and the pH was adjusted to 2.75. Measurement of the free fluorine ion concentration using a fluorine ion meter after adjusting the pH of this treatment liquid to 3.0 revealed a value of 5 ppm.
Example 3 - as a comparison example
[0071] A metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that: polyallylamine "PAA-H-10C" (trade name, manufactured by Nitto Boseki Co., Ltd.) was further added to be 25 ppm; zirconium ion concentration was changed to 250 ppm; and the pH was adjusted to 3.0. Measurement of the free fluorine ion concentration using a fluorine ion meter on this treatment liquid revealed a value of 5 ppm.
Example 4 - as a comparison example
[0072] A metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1, except that: copper nitrate was further added so as to give a copper ion concentration of 10 ppm; the tin ion concentration was changed to 10 ppm; and the pH was adjusted to 3.0. Measurement of the free fluorine ion concentration using a fluorine ion meter on this treatment liquid revealed a value of 5 ppm.
Example 5 - as a comparison example
[0073] A metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating was obtained in a similar manner to Example 4, except that: the hydrolysis condensate of aminosilane obtained in Production Example 2 was further added to be 200 ppm; and the tin ion concentration was changed to 30 ppm. Measurement of the free fluorine ion concentration using a fluorine ion meter on this treatment liquid revealed a value of 5 ppm.
Example 6 - as a comparison example
[0074] A metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating was obtained in a similar manner to Example 2, except that: aluminum nitrate was further added so as to give an aluminum ion concentration of 200 ppm; and tin sulfate was changed to tin acetate so as to give the tin ion concentration of 30 ppm. Measurement of the free fluorine ion concentration using a fluorine ion meter after adjusting the pH of this treatment liquid to 3.0 revealed a value of 5 ppm.
Examples 7 and 8 - as comparison examples
[0075] Metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating were obtained in a similar manner to Example 6, except that the pH was adjusted to 3.5 and 4.0. The free fluorine ion concentration measured using a fluorine ion meter after adjusting the pH of this treatment liquid to 3.0 is shown in Table 1.
Examples 9 to 16 - as comparison examples
[0076] Metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating were obtained in a similar manner to Example 7, except that the amount of added 40% aqueous zirconic acid solution, tin sulfate, and aluminum nitrate was changed so as to give a zirconium ion concentration, a tin ion concentration, and an aluminum ion concentration as shown in Table 1. The free fluorine ion concentration measured using a fluorine ion meter after adjusting the pH of this treatment liquid to 3.0 is shown in Table 1.
Example 17
[0077] A metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating was obtained in a similar manner to Example 2, except that: indium nitrate was further added so as to give an indium ion concentration of 200 ppm; tin sulfate was changed to tin fluoride so as to give a tin ion concentration of 30 ppm; and the pH was adjusted to 3.5. Measurement of the free fluorine ion concentration using a fluorine ion meter after adjusting the pH of this treatment liquid to 3.0 revealed a value of 5 ppm.
Example 18
[0078] A metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating was obtained in a similar manner to Example 2, except that: diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) was further added as a chelating agent to give a concentration of 100 ppm; tin acetate was changed to tin sulfate, thereby changing the tin ion concentration to 30 ppm; and further, the zirconium ion concentration was changed to 1,000 ppm. Measurement of the free fluorine ion concentration using a fluorine ion meter after adjusting the pH of this treatment liquid to 3.0 revealed a value of 10 ppm.
Example 19 - as a comparison example
[0079] A metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating was obtained in a similar manner to Example 2, except that: sodium nitrate was further added so as to give a sodium ion concentration of 5,000 ppm; and the tin ion concentration was changed to 30 ppm. Measurement of the free fluorine ion concentration using a fluorine ion meter after adjusting the pH of this treatment liquid to 3.0 revealed a value of 5 ppm.
Example 20
[0080] A metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating was obtained in a similar manner to Example 5, except that: glycine as chelating agents and copper nitrate further added so as to give a concentration of 50 ppm and copper ion concentration of 10 ppm, respectively; and the concentration of polyamine was changed to 100 ppm. Measurement of the free fluorine ion concentration using a fluorine ion meter on this treatment liquid revealed a value of 5 ppm.
Examples 21 to 31 - as comparison examples
[0081] Metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating were respectively obtained in a similar manner to Example 1, except that: polyamine as described in Table 1 was added in a specified amount; and the concentration of the other component was changed as shown in Table 1. The free fluorine ion concentrations measured using a fluorine ion meter on these treatment liquids under a condition of pH 3.0 are shown together in Table 1.
Examples 32 to 50
[0082] Metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating were respectively obtained in a similar manner to Example 1, except that: sulfonic acid described in Table 2 was added in a specified amount; and polyamine and the other component were changed as shown in Table 2. The free fluorine ion concentrations measured using a fluorine ion meter on these treatment liquids under a condition of pH 3.0 are shown together in Table 2. In Table 2, the used naphthalenesulfonic acid-formaldehyde condensate was DEMOL NL manufactured by Kao Corporation; sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate was PELEX NBL manufactured by Kao Corporation; and sodium polystyrenesulfonate was P-NASS-1 manufactured by Tosoh Corporation.
Examples 51
[0083] Metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating were respectively obtained in a similar manner to Example 1, except that: ascorbic acid as described in Table 3 was added in a specified amount; and polyamine and the other component were changed as shown in Table 3. The free fluorine ion concentrations measured using a fluorine ion meter on these treatment liquids under a condition of pH 3.0 are shown together in Table 3.
Examples 52 to 59 - as comparison examples
[0084] Metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating were respectively obtained in a similar manner to Example 1, except that: the oxidizing agent described in Table 3 was added in a specified amount; and polyamine and the other component were changed as shown in Table 3. The free fluorine ion concentrations measured using a fluorine ion meter on these treatment liquids under a condition of pH 3.0 are shown together in Table 3. Examples 60 to 74 - of which Examples 66 and 74 are comparison examples
[0085] Metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating were respectively obtained in a similar manner to Example 1, except that: the nitrogen-based rust-preventive agent, the sulfur-based rust-preventive agent, or the phenol-based rust-preventive agent described in Table 3 was added in a specified amount; and polyamine and the other component were changed as shown in Table 3. The free fluorine ion concentrations measured using a fluorine ion meter on these treatment liquids under a condition of pH 3.0 are shown together in Table 3.
Examples 75 to 77 - of which Example 75 is a comparison example
[0086] Metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating were respectively obtained in a similar manner to Example 1, except that: instead of a cold-rolled steel plate (SPC) a high-tensile steel plate was used as the base plate that is the object; and polyamine and the other component described in Table 3 were changed as shown in Table 3. The free fluorine ion concentrations measured using a fluorine ion meter on these treatment liquids under a condition of pH 3.0 are shown together in Table 3. Examples 78 to 106 - of which Examples 78 to 91, 94 and 96 to 106 are comparison examples
[0087] With respect to Examples 2, 3, and 5 to 31, metal surface treatment liquids for cation electrodeposition coating were obtained in a similar manner to each Example, except that polyamine was not added. The free fluorine ion concentrations measured using a fluorine ion meter after adjusting the pH of the treatment liquids to 3.0 are shown in Table 4. Comparative Examples 1 to 6: Preparation of Comparative Metal Surface Treatment Liquid
[0088] According to the description in Table 1 and Table 3, comparative metal surface treatment liquids were obtained, respectively, based on the aforementioned Examples. Thus resulting metal surface treatment liquids are summarized in Table 1 and Table 3.
Table 1
| Zr Concentration (ppm) | Tin ion supplying compound | Sn Concentration (ppm) | Sn/Zr ratio | pH | Added Component (Concentraion in Parenthesis(ppm)) | Free Fluorineion Concentration | ||
| Polyamine Compound | Others | |||||||
| Example 1* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | absent | 5 | |
| Example 2* | 500 | tin sulfate | 10 | 0.02 | 2.75 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | 5 | |
| Example 3* | 250 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.12 | 3 | poly allylamine(25) | 5 | |
| Example 4* | 500 | tin sulfate | 10 | 0.02 | 3 | absent | copper nitrate (10) | 5 |
| Example 5* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3 | Production Exapmle 2(200) | copper nitrate (10) | 5 |
| Example 6* | 500 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.06 | 2.75 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate(200) | 5 |
| Example 7* | 500 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate (200) | 5 |
| Example 8* | 500 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.06 | 4 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate (200) | 5 |
| Example 9* | 1000 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.03 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate (200) | 7 |
| Example 10* | 500 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate (500) | 5 |
| Example 11* | 500 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate (1000) | 5 |
| Example 12* | 500 | tin acetate | 10 | 0.02 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate (500) | 5 |
| Example 13* | 500 | tin acetate | 200 | 0.4 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate (500) | 5 |
| Example 14* | 200 | tin acetate | 10 | 0.05 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate (200) | 7 |
| Example 15* | 200 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.15 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate (200) | 5 |
| Example 16* | 200 | tin acetate | 70 | 0.35 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate (200) | 5 |
| Example 17 | 500 | tin fluoride | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | indium nitrate (50) | 5 |
| Example 18 | 1000 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.03 | 2.75 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | DTPA (100) | 10 |
| Example 19* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 2.75 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | sodium nitrate (5000) | 5 |
| Example 20 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3 | Production Exapmle 2(100) | coppoer sulfate (10), glycine (50) | 5 |
| Example 21* | 20 | tin sulfate | 5 | 0.25 | 3 | Production Exapmle 1(10) | 2 | |
| Example 22* | 500 | tin sulfate | 20 | 0.04 | 2 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | 1 | |
| Example 23* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 5.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | 20 | |
| Example 24* | 5000 | tin sulfate | 25 | 0.005 | 3 | Production Exapmle 1(2000) | 10 | |
| Example 25* | 50 | tin sulfate | 10 | 0.2 | 3 | Production ExapmLe 2(50) | 3 | |
| Example 26* | 50 | tin sulfate | 50 | 1 | 3 | Production Exapmle 2(25) | 1 | |
| Example 27* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3 | Production Exapmle 1(50) | 0 | |
| Example 28* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 2.75 | Production Exapmle 2(50) | 0.1 | |
| Example 29* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 2.75 | Production Exapmle 2(50) | 0.6 | |
| Example 30* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 4 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | 20 | |
| Example 31* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 4.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | 50 | |
| Comparative Example 1 | 500 | absent | 0 | 0 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | 7 | |
| Comparative Example 2 | 500 | absent | 0 | 0 | 3 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | aluminum nitrate (500) | 5 |
| Comparative Example 3 | 50 | absent | 0 | 0 | 3.5 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | 5 | |
| Comparative Example 4 | 500 | tin sulfate | 250 | 0.5 | 1 | Production Exapmle i(200) | 5 | |
| Comparative Example 5 | 500 | tin sulfate | 250 | 0.5 | 8 | Production Exapmle 1(200) | 5 | |
| *now Comparison Examples too |
Table 2
| Zr Concentration (ppm) | Tin ion supplying compound | Sn Concentration (ppm) | Sn/Zr ratio | pH | Added Component (Concentration in Parenthesis(ppm)) | Free Fluorineion Concentration | |||
| Polyamine Compounds | Other Metal | Others | |||||||
| Example 32 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmple 1(200) | taurine(100) | 5 | |
| Example 33 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmple 1(200) | methan sulfonic acid(100) | 5 | |
| Example 34 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmple 1(200) | isethionic acid(100) | 5 | |
| Example 35 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmple 1(200) | sodium naphthalenedisulfonate (100) | 5 | |
| Example 36 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmple 1(200) | sodium amino naphthalenedisulfonate (100) | 5 | |
| Example 37 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmple 1(200) | sulfosalicylic acid(100) | 5 | |
| Example 38 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmple 1(200) | naphthalene sulfonic acid - formaldehyde condensate (100) | 5 | |
| Example 39 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmple 1(200) | sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate(100) | 5 | |
| Example 40 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Exapmple 1(200) | copper nitrate(10) | taurine (100) | 5 |
| Example 41 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate (10) | taurine (100) | 5 |
| Example 42 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitrate (200) | methan sulfonic acid(100) | 5 |
| Example 43 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate(10) | isethionic acid(100) | 5 |
| Example 44 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitrate (200) | sodium naphthalenedisulfonate (100) | 5 |
| Example 45 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate (10) | sodium aminonaphthalenedisulfo nate(100) | 5 |
| Example 46 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitrate (200) | sulfosalicylic acid(100) | 5 |
| Example 47 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate(10) | naphthalene sulfonic acid - formaldehyde condensate(100) | 5 |
| Example 48 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitrate (200) | sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate (100) | 5 |
| Example 49 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate(10) | sodium styrenesulfonate (100) | 5 |
| Example 50 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitrate (200) | sodium polystyrene sulfonate(100) | 5 |
Table 3
| Zr Concentration (ppm) | Tin ion supplying compound | Sn Concentration (ppm) | Sn/Zr ratio | pH | Added Component (Concentration in Parenthesis(ppm)) | Free Fluorineion Concentration | |||
| Polyamine Compounds | Other Metal | Others | |||||||
| Example 51 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | - | sodium ascorbate (50) | 5 |
| Example 52 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 . | Production Example 1(200) | - | as sodium nitrate (10000) | 5 |
| Example 53 * | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | - | hydrogen peroxide(10) | 5 |
| Example 54* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | - | sodium nitrate(50) | 5 |
| Example 55* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | - | sodium bromate (100) | 5 |
| Example 56* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate (10) | as sodium nitrate (10000) | 5 |
| Example 57 * | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitrate (200) | hydrogen peroxide (10) | 5 |
| Example 58* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate (10) | sodium nitrite(50) | 5 |
| Example 59* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | aluminium nitrate (200) | sodium bromate (100) | 5 |
| Example 60 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | - | hydroquinone (100) | 5 |
| Example 61 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | - | ethylene urea(100) | 5 |
| Example 62 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | - | quinolinol(100) | 5 |
| Example 63 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | - | thiourea(100) | 5 |
| Example 64 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | Production - | benzotriazole(100) | 5 |
| Example 65 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | - | mercaptobenzothiazole (100) | 5 |
| Example 66* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | - | KBM803(100) | 5 |
| Example 67 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | copper nitrate(10) | benzotriazole(100) | 5 |
| Example 68 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate(10) | hydroquinone(100) | 5 |
| Example 69 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate(10) | ethylene urea(100) | 5 |
| Example 70 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate(10) | quinolinol(100) | 5 |
| Example 71 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate(10) | thiourea(100) | 5 |
| Example 72 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate(10) | benzotriazole(100) | 5 |
| Example 73 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate(10) | mercaptobenzothiazole (100) | 5 |
| Example 74 * | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | copper nitrate(10) | KBM803(100) | 5 |
| Example 75 * | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | copper nitrate (10) | as sodium nitrate (10000) | 5 |
| Example 76 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | copper nitrate(10) | taurine(100) | 5 |
| Example 77 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | copper nitrate(10) | benzotriazole(100) | 5 |
| Comparative Example 6 | 500 | - | - | - | 3.5 | Production Example 1(200) | - | 5 | |
| *now Comparison Examples too |
Table 4
| Zr Concentration (ppm) | Tin ion supplying compound | Sn Concentration (ppm) | Sn/Zr ratio | pH | Added Component (Concentraion in Parenthesis (ppm)) | Free Fluorineion Concentration | ||
| Polyamine Compound | Others | |||||||
| Example 78 * | 500 | tin sulfate | 10 | 0.02 | 2.75 | - | 5 | |
| Example 79 * | 250 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.12 | 3 | - | 5 | |
| Example 80 * | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3 | - | copper nitrate(10) | 5 |
| Example 81 * | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 2.75 | - | aluminum nitarte(200) | 5 |
| Example 82 * | 500 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitarte(200) | 5 |
| Example 83 * | 500 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.06 | 4 | - | aluminum nitarte(200) | 5 |
| Example 84 * | 1000 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.03 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitarte(200) | 7 |
| Example 85 * | 500 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitrate(500) | 5 |
| Example 86 * | 500 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitrate(1000) | 5 |
| Example 87 * | 500 | tin acetate | 10 | 0.02 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitrate(500) | 5 |
| Example 88 * | 500 | tin acetate | 200 | 0.4 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitrate(500) | 5 |
| Example 89 * | 200 | tin acetate | 10 | 0.05 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitarte(200) | 7 |
| Example 90 * | 200 | tin acetate | 30 | 0.15 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitarte(200) | 5 |
| Example 91 * | 200 | tin acetate | 70 | 0.35 | 3.5 | - | aluminum nitarte(200) | 5 |
| Example 92 | 500 | tin fluoride | 30 | 0.06 | 3.5 | - | indium nitrate(50) | 5 |
| Example 93 | 1000 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.03 | 2.75 | - | DTPA(100) | 10 |
| Example 94 * | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 2.75 | - | sodium nitrate(5000) | 5 |
| Example 95 | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3 | - | copper nitrate(10), glycine(50) | 5 |
| Example 96 * | 20 | tin sulfate | 5 | 0.25 | 3 | - | 2 | |
| Example 97 * | 500 | tin sulfate | 20 | 0.04 | 2 | - | 1 | |
| Example 98 * | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 5.5 | - | 20 | |
| Example 99 * | 5000 | tin sulfate | 25 | 0.005 | 3 | - | 10 | |
| Example 100* | 50 | tin sulfate | 10 | 0.2 | 3 | - | 3 | |
| Example 101* | 50 | tin sulfate | 50 | 1 | 3 | - | 1 | |
| Example 102* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 3 | - | 0 | |
| Example 103* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 2.75 | - | 0.1 | |
| Example 104* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 2.75 | - | 0.6 | |
| Example 105* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 4 | - | 20 | |
| Example 106* | 500 | tin sulfate | 30 | 0.06 | 4.5 | - | 50 | |
| *now Comparison Examples too |
Surface Treatment
[0089] As metal base materials, a commercially available cold-rolled steel plate (SPC, manufactured by Nippon Testpanel Co., Ltd., 70 mm x 150 mm x 0.8 mm) was provided for Examples 1 to 74, Examples 78 to 106, and Comparative Examples 1 to 5, and a high-tensile steel plate (70 mm x 150 mm x 1.0 mm) was provided for Examples 75 to 77, and Comparative Example 6. These plates were subjected to a degreasing treatment using "SURFCLEANER EC92" (trade name, manufactured by Nippon Paint Co., Ltd.) as an alkali degreasing treatment agent at 40°C for 2 minutes. This plate was dipped and washed in a water washing bath, and then washed by spraying tap water thereon for approximately 30 seconds.
[0090] The metal base material following the degreasing treatment was subjected to a surface treatment by dipping thereof in the metal surface treatment liquid prepared in Examples and Comparative Examples at 40°C for 90 seconds. However, the treatment time period was 240 seconds and 15 seconds, respectively, in Examples 21 and 22. After completing the surface treatment, the plate was dried at 40°C for 5 minutes, and the thus surface treated metal base material was obtained. Unless specifically stated, this surface treated metal base material was used as a test plate in the following evaluation.
Measurement of Element Content in Coating Film
[0091] The content of each element included in the coating film was measured using an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer "XRF1700" manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation.
Primary Rust Prevention
[0092] After immersing the test plate in pure water at 25°C for 5 hours, the generation state of rust was visually observed.
- A: no rust generation observed
- B: slightly generated rust observed
- C: rust generation clearly identified
Observation of Sludge
[0093] With 10 L of the surface treatment liquids of the Examples and Comparative Examples, 200 test panels were subjected to the surface treatment and evaluation was made according to the following standards through visual observation as to whether the surface treatment liquid became turbid due to generation of sludge following the lapse of 30 days at room temperature.
- A: transparent liquid
- B: slightly turbid
- C: turbid
- D: precipitate (sludge) generated
Evaluation of Throwing Power
[0094] The throwing power was evaluated according to a "four-plate box method" described in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2000-038525. More specifically, as shown in Fig. 1, test plates 1 to 4 were arranged to stand up in parallel with intervals of 20 mm to produce a box 10 sealed with an insulator such as cloth adhesive tape at the underneath of both side faces and the bottom face. Through-holes 5 having a diameter of 8 mm were provided underneath the metal materials 1, 2 and 3, except for metal material 4.
[0095] This box 10 was dipped into an electrodeposition coating vessel 20 filled with a cation electrodeposition coating solution "POWERNICS 110" (trade name, manufactured by Nippon Paint Co., Ltd.). In this case, the cation electrodeposition coating solution entered inside the box 10 only from each through-hole 5.
[0096] Each of the test plates 1 to 4 was electrically connected while stirring the cation electrodeposition coating solution with a magnetic stirrer, and a counter electrode 21 was arranged such that the distance from the test plate 1 became 150 mm. Voltage was applied with each of the test plates 1 to 4 as cathodes, and the counter electrode 21 as an anode to execute cation electrodeposition coating. The coating was carried out by elevating to the intended voltage (210 V and 160 V) over 30 seconds from initiation of the application, and thereafter maintaining the voltage for 150 seconds. The bath temperature in this process was regulated to 30°C.
[0097] After washing each of the test plates 1 to 4 with water after coating, they were baked at 170°C for 25 minutes, followed by air cooling. The throwing power was then evaluated by measuring the film thickness of the coated film formed on side A of the test plate 1 that is the closest to the counter electrode 21, and the film thickness of the coated film formed on side G of the test plate 4 that is the farthest from the counter electrode 21 to determine a ratio of the film thickness (side G)/film thickness (side A). As this value becomes greater, better evaluation of the throwing power can be decided. The acceptable level was no less than 40%.
Coating Voltage
[0098] Using the surface treatment liquids of Examples and Comparative Examples, cold-rolled steel plates and zinc coated steel plates were subjected to a surface treatment, whereby test plates were obtained. Using the cation electrodeposition coating solution "POWERNICS 110" described above on these test plates, the voltage required for obtaining a 20 µm electrodeposition coated film was determined. The difference in coating voltage required for obtaining the 20 µm electrodeposition coated film was then determined between the case in which the metal base material was a zinc coated steel plate, and the case of the cold-rolled steel plate. As the difference becomes smaller, superiority as a surface treated coating film is suggested. A difference of no greater than 40 V is acceptable.
[0099] The voltage required for obtaining a 20 µm electrodeposition coated film was determined as in the following manner. Under the electrodeposition condition, the voltage was elevated to a specified voltage over 30 seconds, and thereafter maintaining for 150 seconds. The resulting film thickness was measured. Such a procedure was conducted for 150 V, 200 V, and 250 V. Thus, a voltage to give a 20 µm film thickness was derived from the formula of relationship between the determined voltage and the film thickness.
Appearance of Coating
[0100] The test plate was subjected to cation electrodeposition coating, and the appearance of the resulting electrodeposition coated film was evaluated according to the following standards. The results are shown in Tables 5 to 8.
- A: uniform coated film obtained
- B: nearly uniform coated film obtained
- C: some non-uniformity of the coated film found
- D: non-uniformity of the coated film found
Secondary Adhesion Test (SDT)
[0101] After forming a 20 µm electrodeposition coated film, the test plates were incised to provide two parallel cut lines that ran longitudinally, with the depth to reach to the metal basis material, and then immersed in a 5% aqueous sodium chloride solution at 55°C for 240 hours. After water washing and air drying, an adhesive tape "L-PACK LP-24" (trade name, manufactured by Nichiban Co., Ltd.) was adhered to the portion including the cuts. Then, the adhesive tape was peeled off abruptly. The maximum width (one side) of the coating adhered to the stripped adhesive tape was measured.
- A: 0 mm
- B: less than 2 mm
- C: at least 2 mm to less than 5 mm
- D: no less than 5 mm
Cycle Corrosion Test (CCT)
[0102] After forming the 20 µm electrodeposition coated film on the test plate, the edge and back face was sealed with a tape, thereby providing cross cuttings that reached to the metal basis material. A 5% aqueous sodium chloride solution incubated at 35°C was continuously sprayed for 2 hours onto this sample in a salt spray tester kept at 35°C, and with a humidity of 95%. Subsequently, it was dried under conditions of 60°C and with a humidity of 20 to 30% for 4 hours. Such a sequence of procedures repeated three times in 24 hours was defined as one cycle, and 200 cycles were carried out. Thereafter, the width of the swelling portion of the coated film (both sides) was measured.
- A: less than 6 mm
- B: at least 6 mm to less than 8 mm
- C: at least 8 mm to less than 10 mm
- D: no less than 10 mm
Salt Spray Test (SST)
[0103] After forming the 20 µm electrodeposition coated film on the test plate, the edge and the back face were sealed with a tape, thereby providing cross cuttings that reached to the metal basis material. A 5% aqueous sodium chloride solution incubated at 35°C was continuously sprayed for 840 hours to this sample in a salt spray tester kept at 35°C, and with a humidity of 95%. After washing with water and air drying, an adhesive tape "L-PACK LP-24" (trade name, manufactured by Nichiban Co., Ltd.) was adhered on the portion including the cuts. Then, the adhesive tape was peeled off quickly. The maximum width (one side) of the coating adhered to the stripped adhesive tape was measured.
- A: less than 2 mm
- B: at least 2 mm to less than 5 mm
- C: no less than 5 mm
[0104] The evaluation results are summarized in Tables 5 to 8.
Table 5
| Content of Element | Primary Rust Prevention | Observation of sludge | Throwing Power (%) | Difference in Coating Voltage (V) | Appearance of Coating | SDT | CCT | SST | |||||
| Zr | Si | Sn | Cu | 210V | 160V | ||||||||
| Example 1* | 45 | 22 | A | B | 60% | 52% | 30 | A | - | B | A | ||
| Example 2* | 51 | 3.3 | 13 | A | B | 57% | 25% | 40 | B | A | B | A | |
| Example 3* | 44 | 24 | A | B | 57% | 44% | 40 | A | B | B | A | ||
| Example 4* | 55 | 16 | 8 | A | B | 58% | 51% | 40 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 5* | 46 | 6.2 | 27 | 11 | A | B | 61% | 55% | 20 | A | A | A | A |
| Example 6* | 42 | 3.5 | 19 | A | B | 57% | 47% | 40 | A | A | B | A | |
| Example 7* | 56 | 3.7 | 15 | - | A | B | 53% | 42% | 30 | B | A | B | A |
| Example 8* | 62 | 4.1 | 12 | - | A | C | 51% | 39% | 30 | B | A | B | A |
| Example 9* | 41 | 2.3 | 16 | - | A | B | 53% | 41% | 30 | B | B | B | A |
| Example 10* | 72 | 2.4 | 15 | - | A | C | 54% | 43% | 30 | B | A | B | A |
| Example 11* | 62 | 2.4 | 15 | - | A | C | 53% | 43% | 30 | B | B | B | A |
| Example 12* | 75 | 3.2 | 10 | - | A | C | 49% | 40% | 30 | B | A | A | A |
| Example 13* | 32 | 2.1 | 31 | - | A | B | 59% | 51% | 20 | B | B | B | A |
| Example 14* | 52 | 2.5 | 12 | - | A | B | 58% | 30% | 40 | B | A | B | A |
| Example 15* | 38 | 2.3 | 18 | A | B | 59% | 48% | 20 | B | B | B | A | |
| Example 16* | 31 | 2.1 | 23 | A | B | 62% | 50% | 20 | B | B | B | A | |
| Example 17 | 55 | 3 | 22 | A | B | 59% | 50% | 20 | A | A | B | A | |
| Example 18 | 51 | 3.3 | 19 | A | A | 56% | 51% | 30 | A | B | B | A | |
| Example 19* | 44 | 2.5 | 23 | A | B | 56% | 49% | 30 | A | A | B | A | |
| Example 20 | 48 | 4.8 | 22 | 6 | A | A | 58% | 52% | 20 | A | B | A | A |
| Example 21* | 28 | 1.8 | 21 | A | B | 52% | 44% | 30 | B | B | B | A | |
| Example 22* | 63 | 4.2 | 28 | A | B | 55% | 49% | 30 | B | B | B | A | |
| Example 23* | 44 | 2.9 | 26 | A | B | 60% | 43% | 30 | B | B | B | A | |
| Example 24* | 77 | 5.1 | 31 | A | B | 52% | 52% | 20 | B | A | A | A | |
| Example 25* | 34 | 2.6 | 26 | A | B | 51% | 41% | 30 | B | B | B | A | |
| Example 26* | 42 | 2.6 | 27 | A | B | 62% | 48% | 20 | B | B | B | A | |
| Example 27* | 38 | 2.7 | 18 | A | B | 52% | 29% | 40 | B | B | B | A | |
| Example 28* | 38 | 3.5 | 21 | A | B | 53% | 36% | 30 | B | B | B | A | |
| Example 29* | 41 | 3 | 26 | A | B | 55% | 42% | 30 | B | B | B | A | |
| Example 30* | 44 | 3 | 22 | A | B | 58% | 41% | 30 | B | A | A | A | |
| Example 31* | 47 | 3.5 | 25 | A | B | 57% | 48% | 20 | B | A | A | A | |
| Comparative Example 1 | 52 | 3.5 | B | B | 21% | 12% | 80 | C | B | C | A | ||
| Comparative Example 2 | 55 | 3.3 | B | B | 36% | 15% | 50 | B | D | C | B | ||
| Comparative Example 3 | 5.2 | 0.1 | 38 | A | B | 60% | 55% | 30 | B | D | D | C | |
| Comparative Example 4 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | C | D | 57% | 45% | 30 | B | D | D | C | |
| Comparative Example 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | C | - | 38% | - | - | B | D | D | C | |
| * now Comparison Examples too |
Table 6
| Content of Element | Primary Rust Prevention | Observation of sludge | Throwing Power (%) | Difference in Coating Voltage (V) | Appearance of Coating | SDT | CCT | SST | |||||
| Zr | Si | Sn | Cu | 210V | 160V | ||||||||
| Example 32 | 42 | 3.2 | 18 | A | B | 6900% | 6100% | 10 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 33 | 45 | 3.3 | 16 | A | B | 6200% | 5700% | 20 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 34 | 41 | 3 | 15 | A | B | 6200% | 5500% | 20 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 35 | 38 | 2.9 | 16 | A | B | 6400% | 5100% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 36 | 44 | 3.1 | 19 | A | B | 6100% | 5300% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 37 | 51 | 3.6 | 21 | A | B | 5900% | 5200% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 38 | 48 | 3.5 | 16 | A | B | 6000% | 4700% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 39 | 42 | 32 | 22 | A | B | 6000% | 4600% | 20 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 40 | 55 | 3.8 | 18 | 8 | A | B | 6900% | 6200% | 10 | A | A | A | A |
| Example 41 | 48 | 18 | 8 | A | B | 6800% | 6500% | 10 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 42 | 41 | 16 | A | B | 6500% | 6000% | 20 | A | B | B | A | ||
| Example 43 | 52 | 17 | 7 | A | B | 6500% | 6000% | 20 | A | B | A | A | |
| Example 44 | 43 | 18 | A | B | 6200% | 5500% | 30 | A | B | B | A | ||
| Example 45 | 55 | 18 | 9 | A | B | 6000% | 5600% | 30 | A | B | A | A | |
| Example 46 | 43 | 16 | A | B | 5900% | 5300% | 30 | A | B | B | A | ||
| Example 47 | 58 | 20 | 6 | A | B | 6100% | 4900% | 30 | A | B | A | A | |
| Example 48 | 45 | 19 | A | B | 6200% | 4700% | 30 | A | B | B | A | ||
| Example 49 | 56 | 17 | 7 | A | B | 5800% | 4400% | 40 | A | B | A | A | |
| Example 50 | 41 | 16 | A | B | 5800% | 4500% | 40 | A | B | B | A | ||
Table 7
| Content of Element | Primary Rust Prevention | Observation of sludge | Throwing Power (%) | Difference in Coating Voltage (V) | Appearance of Coating | SDT | CCT | SST | |||||
| Zr | Si | Sn | Cu | 210V | 160V | ||||||||
| Example 51 | 91 | 5.7 | 19 | A | B | 6200% | 5500% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 52* | 75 | 5.1 | 21 | A | B | 5700% | 5000% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 53* | 81 | 5.3 | 18 | A | B | 5600% | 5100% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 54* | B8 | 5.7 | 14 | A | B | 5900% | 4700% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 55* | 72 | 4.8 | 17 | A | B | 6000% | 5000% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 56* | 72 | 18 | 6 | A | B | 5900% | 5100% | 20 | A | B | B | A | |
| Example 57* | 85 | 21 | A | B | 5700% | 4800% | 30 | A | B | B | A | ||
| Example 58* | 91 | 20 | 7 | A | B | 5900% | 5100% | 20 | A | B | B | A | |
| Example 59* | 94 | 18 | A | B | 6000% | 5200% | 30 | A | . B | B | A | ||
| Example 60 | 44 | 3.2 | 15 | A | B | 6200% | 5500% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 61 | 46 | 3.1 | 19 | A | B | 6100% | 5100% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 62 | 49 | 3.6 | 18 | A | B | 6000% | 5300% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 63 | 38 | 3 | 20 | A | B | 6500% | 5700% | 20 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 64 | 44 | 3.2 | 16 | A | B | 6600% | 5500% | 20 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 65 | 41 | 3.5 | 17 | A | B | 6100% | 5800% | 20 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 66 * | 49 | 3.2 | 16 | A | B | 6200% | 5500% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 67 | 41 | 3.2 | 15 | 7 | A | B | 6800% | 5900% | 20 | A | A | A | A |
| Example 68 | 51 | 18 | 7 | A | B | 5900% | 5300% | 30 | A | B | A | A | |
| Example 69 | 52 | 18 | 5 | A | B | 6300% | 5100% | 30 | A | B | A | A | |
| Example 70 | 48 | 19 | 9 | A | B | 6100% | 5300% | 30 | A | B | A | A | |
| Example 71 | 55 | 17 | 6 | A | B | 6500% | 5500% | 30 | A | B | A | A | |
| Example 72 | 43 | 16 | 10 | A | B | 6200% | 5800% | 20 | A | B | A | A | |
| Example 73 | 49 | 20 | 20 | 7 | A | B | 6600% | 5400% | 20 | A | B | A | A |
| Example 74 * | 52 | 17 | 5 | A | B | 6200% | 5200% | 30 | A | B | A | ||
| Example 75 * | 67 | 4.7 | 18 | A | B | 5900% | 5200% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 76 | 54 | 3.2 | 16 | A | B | 6200% | 5800% | 20 | A | A | A | A | |
| Example 77 | 48 | 2.8 | 17 | A | B | 5900% | 5000% | 30 | A | A | A | A | |
| Comparative Example 6 | 58 | 4.2 | B | B | 2200% | 1000% | 80 | C | B | D | B | ||
| * now Comparison Examples too |
Table 8
| Content of Element | Primary Rust Prevention | Observation of sludge | Throwing Power(%) | Difference in Coating Voltage (V) | Appearance of Coating | SDT | CCT | SST | |||||
| Zr | Si | Sn | Cu | 210V | 160V | ||||||||
| Example 78* | 55 | 13 | A | B | 5900% | 5000% | 40 | B | C | B | B | ||
| Example 79* | 44 | 24 | A | B | 5800% | 2500% | 40 | B | C | B | B | ||
| Example 80* | 49 | 21 | A | B | 6900% | 5500% | 30 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 81* | 45 | 18 | A | B | 5900% | 5000% | 20 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 82* | 38 | 26 | A | B | 6000% | 5000% | 20 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 83* | 45 | 9 | A | B | 5900% | 5100% | 20 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 84* | 51 | 18 | A | B | 5800% | 5200% | 20 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 85* | 43 | 21 | A | B | 6000% | 5400% | 20 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 86* | 36 | 18 | A | B | 6100% | 5300% | 10 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 87* | 47 | 23 | A | B | 5900% | 5100% | 10 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 88* | 32 | 33 | A | B | 6000% | 5300% | 20 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 89* | 52 | 12 | A | B | 6100% | 5300% | 20 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 90* | 42 | 21 | A | B | 6000% | 5100% | 20 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 91* | 36 | 28 | A | B | 5900% | 5300% | 20 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 92 | 50 | 22 | A | B | 6000% | 5100% | 30 | A | C | B | B | ||
| Example 93 | 50 | 24 | A | A | 5500% | 4800% | 30 | B | C | 8 | 8 | ||
| Example 94* | 46 | 26 | A | B | 5800% | 4900% | 30 | B | C | B | B | ||
| Example 95 | 46 | 15 | A | A | 6000% | 5100% | 20 | A | C | A | B | ||
| Example 96* | 30 | 21 | A | B | 5600% | 4800% | 40 | B | C | B | B | ||
| Example 97* | 65 | 26 | A | B | 5700% | 4700% | 30 | A | C | B | B | ||
| Example 98* | 42 | 19 | A | B | 5300% | 5000% | 30 | A | C | B | B | ||
| Example 99* | 72 | 21 | A | B | 5200% | 4900% | 30 | A | C | B | B | ||
| Example 100* | 33 | 10 | A | B | 5600% | 3200% | 40 | B | C | B | B | ||
| Example 101* | 43 | 22 | A | B | 5200% | 5200% | 20 | A | C | B | B | ||
| Example 102* | 40 | 24 | A | B | 5800% | 4200% | 20 | A | C | B | B | ||
| Example 103* | 43 | 16 | A | B | 5700% | 4800% | 30 | B | C | B | B | ||
| Example 104* | 41 | 17 | A | B | S400% | 3400% | 30 | A | C | B | B | ||
| Example 105 * | 40 | 21 | A | B | 5700% | 3300% | 30 | A | C | B | B | ||
| Example 106 * | 40 | 11 | A | B | 5500% | 4500% | 30 | A | C | B | B | ||
| * now Comparison Examples too |
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
1. A metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating comprising zirconium
ions and tin ions, and having a pH of 1.5 to 6.5, wherein:
a concentration of zirconium ions is in the range of 10 to 10,000 ppm; and
a concentration ratio of the tin ions to the zirconium ions is in the range of 0.005 to 1 on a mass basis,
comprising fluorine ions and:
A) a chelate compound, wherein the chelate compound is selected from the group consisting of amino acid, aminocarboxylic acid, aromatic carboxylic acid, ascorbic acid and sulfonic acid, wherein the sulfonic acid is selected from the group consisting of methanesulfonic acid, isethionic acid, taurine, naphthalenedisulfonic acid, aminonaphthalenedisulfonic acid, sulfosalicylic acid, a naphthalenesulfonic acid-formaldehyde condensate, alkylnaphthalenesulfonic acid, a salt of any of these and sodium polystyrenesulfonate; or
B) a nitrogenous, sulfur and/or a phenolic rust-preventive agent selected from the group consisting of hydroquinone, ethyleneurea, quinolinol, thiourea, benzotriazole, a salt of any of these and mercaptobenzothiazole; or
C) indium ions,
wherein the amount of free fluorine ions at a pH of 3.0 is in the range of 0.1 to 50 ppm.
2. The metal surface treatment liquid for cation electrodeposition coating according
to claim 1 that comprises the chelate compound A), comprising additionally a polyamine
compound and copper ions.
3. A method of metal surface treatment comprising a step of subjecting a metal base material
to a surface treatment with the metal surface treatment liquid for cation electro-deposition
coating according to any one of claims 1 and 2.
4. The method of claim 3 further comprising the step of: subjecting the surface treated
metal base material to cation electrodeposition coating.
5. A metal base material comprising a coating film formed by a surface treatment obtained
by the method according to claim 3.
6. The metal base material according to claim 5, wherein an element ratio of zirconium/tin
on a mass basis in the coating film is in the range of 1/10 to 10/1.
7. The metal base material according to claim 5 further coated by the method of claim
4.
1. Metalloberflächenbehandlungsflüssigkeit für kationische Elektrotauchlackierung, die
Zirkoniumionen und Zinnionen umfasst und einen pH-Wert von 1,5 bis 6,5 aufweist, wobei:
die Konzentration an Zirkoniumionen im Bereich von 10 bis 10.000 ppm liegt; und
das Konzentrationsverhältnis der Zinnionen zu den Zirkoniumionen im Bereich von 0,005 bis 1 auf Massenbasis liegt,
umfassend Fluorionen und:
A) eine Chelat-Verbindung, wobei die Chelatverbindung ausgewählt ist aus der Gruppe bestehend aus Aminosäure, Aminocarbonsäure, aromatischer Carbonsäure, Ascorbinsäure und Sulfonsäure, wobei die Sulfonsäure ausgewählt ist aus der Gruppe bestehend aus Methansulfonsäure, Isethionsäure, Taurin, Naphthalindisulfonsäure, Aminonaphthalindisulfonsäure, Sulfosalicylsäure, einem Naphthalinsulfonsäure-Formaldehyd-Kondensat, Alkylnaphthalinsulfonsäure, einem Salz einer dieser und Natriumpolystyrolsulfonat; oder
B) ein stickstoffhaltiges, schwefeliges und/oder ein phenolisches Rostpräventives Mittel ausgewählt aus der Gruppe bestehend aus Hydrochinon, Ethylenharnstoff, Chinolinol, Thioharnstoff, Benzotriazol, einem Salz von einem dieser und Mercaptobenzothiazol; oder
C) Indiumionen,
wobei die Menge an freien Fluorionen bei einem pH von 3,0 im Bereich von 0,1 bis 50 ppm liegt.
2. Metalloberflächenbehandlungsflüssigkeit für kationische Elektrotauchlackierung nach
Anspruch 1, welche die Chelatverbindung A) umfasst, die zusätzlich eine Polyaminverbindung
und Kupferionen umfasst.
3. Verfahren zur Metalloberflächenbehandlung, die einen Schritt des Unterziehens eines
metallischen Grundmaterials einer Oberflächenbehandlung mit der Metalloberflächenbehandlungsflüssigkeit
für kationische Elektrotauchlackierung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 und 2 umfasst.
4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 3, das ferner den folgenden Schritt umfasst: Unterziehen des
oberflächenbehandelten metallischen Grundmaterials einer kationischen Elektrotauchlackierung.
5. Metallisches Grundmaterial, das eine Lackierungsschicht umfasst, die durch eine mit
dem Verfahren nach Anspruch 3 erhaltene Oberflächenbehandlung gebildet wird.
6. Metallisches Grundmaterial nach Anspruch 5, wobei das Elementenverhältnis von Zirkonium/Zinn
auf Massenbasis in der Lackierungsschicht im Bereich von 1/10 bis 10/1 liegt.
7. Metallisches Grundmaterial nach Anspruch 5, das ferner nach dem Verfahren von Anspruch
4 lackiert ist.
1. Liquide de traitement de surface métallique pour revêtement par électrodéposition
cationique, contenant des ions zirconium et des ions étain et ayant un pH de 1,5 à
5,5, dans lequel :
une concentration d'ions zirconium est de 10 à 10 000 ppm ; et
un rapport des concentrations des ions étain aux ions zirconium est de 0,005/1 quant à la masse,
contenant des ions fluor et :
A) un composé de type chélate, le composé de type chélate étant choisi parmi un acide aminé, un acide aminocarboxylique, un acide carboxylique aromatique, un acide ascorbique et un acide sulfonique, l'acide sulfonique étant choisi parmi l'acide méthanesulfonique, l'acide iséthionique, la taurine, l'acide naphtalènesulfonique, l'acide aminonaphtalène-2-sulfonique, l'acide sulfosalycilique, un condensat d'acide naphtalènesulfonique et de formaldéhyde, l'acide alkylnaphtalènesulfonique, un sel de n'importe lequel de ceux-ci et le polystyrène sulfonate de sodium ; ou
B) un agent antirouille azoté, soufré et/ou phénolique choisi parmi l'hydroquinone, l'éthylène urée, le quinolinol, la thio-urée, le benzotriazole, un sel de n'importe lequel de ceux-ci et le mercaptobenzothiazole ; ou
C) des ions indium,
la quantité d'ions fluor libres à un pH de 3,0 étant de 0,1 à 50 ppm.
2. Liquide de traitement de surface métallique pour revêtement par électrodéposition
cationique selon la revendication 1 qui contient le composé A) de type chélate, contenant
en outre un composé polyaminique et des ions cuivre.
3. Procédé de traitement de surface métallique, comportant une étape consistant à soumettre
un substrat métallique à un traitement de surface avec le liquide de traitement de
surface métallique pour revêtement par électrodéposition cationique selon l'une quelconque
des revendications 1 et 2.
4. Procédé selon la revendication 3, comportant en outre l'étape consistant à soumettre
à un revêtement par électrodéposition cationique le substrat métallique ayant subi
le traitement de surface.
5. Substrat métallique comprenant un film de revêtement formé par un traitement de surface
réalisé par le procédé selon la revendication 3.
6. Substrat métallique selon la revendication 5, dans lequel un rapport zirconium/étain
élémentaires quant à la masse dans le film de revêtement est de 1/10 à 10/1.
7. Substrat métallique selon la revendication 6, revêtu en outre à l'aide du procédé
selon la revendication 4.
REFERENCES CITED IN THE DESCRIPTION
This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only. It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.
Patent documents cited in the description
- JP2004218070A [0005]
- US2003230364A [0006]
- WO2006050915A [0006]
- EP1997936A1 [0007]
- WO9312268A1 [0007]
- WO9502077A1 [0007]
- EP1992718A1 [0007]
- JP2000038525A [0094]