[0001] The present invention relates to a lubricating oil composition, in particular to
a lubricating oil composition which is suitable for lubricating internal combustion
engines and which has improved friction reduction and fuel economy.
[0002] Increasingly severe automobile regulations in respect of emissions and fuel efficiency
are placing increasing demands on both engine manufacturers and lubricant formulators
to provide effective solutions to improve fuel economy.
[0003] Optimising lubricants through the use of high performance basestocks and novel additives
represents a flexible solution to a growing challenge.
[0004] Friction-reducing additives (which are also known as friction modifiers) are important
lubricant components in reducing fuel consumption and various such additives are already
known in the art.
[0005] Friction modifiers can be conveniently divided into two categories, that is to say,
metal-containing friction modifiers and ashless (organic) friction modifiers. Organo-molybdenum
compounds are amongst the most common metal-containing friction modifiers. Typical
organo-molybdenum compounds include molybdenum dithiocarbamates (MoDTC), molybdenum
dithiophosphates (MoDTP), molybdenum amines, molybdenum alcoholates, and molybdenum
alcohol-amides.
WO-A-98/26030,
WO-A-99/31113,
WO-A-99/47629 and
WO-A-99/66013 describe tri-nuclear molybdenum compounds for use in lubricating oil compositions.
[0006] However, the trend towards low-ash lubricating oil compositions has resulted in an
increased drive to achieve low friction and improved fuel economy using ashless friction
modifiers.
[0007] Ashless (organic) friction modifiers typically comprise esters of fatty acids and
polyhydric alcohols, fatty acid amides, amines derived from fatty acids and organic
dithiocarbamate or dithiophosphate compounds.
[0008] Further improvements in lubricant performance characteristics have been achieved
through the use of synergistic behaviours of particular combinations of lubricant
additives.
[0009] WO-A-99/50377 discloses a lubricating oil composition which is said to have a significant increase
in fuel economy due to the use therein of tri-nuclear molybdenum compounds in conjunction
with oil soluble dithiocarbamates.
[0010] EP-A-1041135 discloses the use of succinimide dispersants in conjunction with molybdenum dialkyldithiocarbamates
to give improved friction reduction in diesel engines.
[0011] US-B1-6562765 discloses a lubricating oil composition which is said to have a synergy between an
oxymolybdenum nitrogen dispersant complex and an oxymolybdenum dithiocarbamate which
leads to unexpectedly low friction coefficients.
[0013] WO-A-92/02602 describes lubricating oil compositions for internal combustion engines which comprise
a blend of ashless friction modifiers which are said to have a synergistic effect
on fuel economy.
[0014] The blend disclosed in
WO-A-92/02602 is a combination of (a) an amine/amide friction modifier prepared by reacting one
or more acids with one or more polyamines and (b) an ester/alcohol friction modifier
prepared by reacting one or more acids with one or more polyols.
[0015] US-A-5286394 discloses a friction-reducing lubricating oil composition and a method for reducing
the fuel consumption of an internal combustion engine.
[0016] The lubricating oil composition disclosed therein comprises a major amount of an
oil having lubricating viscosity and a minor amount of a friction-modifying, polar
and surface active organic compound selected from a long list of compounds including
mono- and higher esters of polyols and aliphatic amides. Glycerol monooleate and oleamide
(i.e. oleylamide) are mentioned as examples of such compounds.
[0017] However, current strategies with regard to friction reduction for fuel economy oils
are not sufficient to meet ever increasing fuel economy targets set by Original Equipment
Manufacturers (OEMs).
[0018] For example, molybdenum friction modifiers typically outperform ashless friction
modifiers in the boundary regime and there is a challenge to approach similar levels
of friction modification using solely ashless friction modifiers.
[0019] Thus, given the increasing fuel economy demands placed on engines, there remains
a need to further improve the friction reduction and fuel economy of internal combustion
engines utilising low ash lubricating oil compositions.
[0020] It is therefore desirable to further improve on the performance of known ashless
friction modifiers and known combinations of ashless friction modifiers, in particular
to further improve on the friction-reducing performance of polyol ester friction modifiers
and ashless friction modifier combinations of fatty acid amides and polyol esters
(for example, combinations of oleylamide and glycerol monooleate) that have been commonly
used in the art.
[0021] There has now been surprisingly found in the present invention a lubricating oil
composition comprising ashless friction modifiers which has good friction reduction
and fuel economy.
[0022] Accordingly, the present invention provides a lubricating oil composition comprising
base oil, oleylamide and one or more ether compounds, wherein the one or more ether
compounds are compounds of formula I,
wherein R
1, and R
3 are each, independently, selected from hydrogen, alkyl groups having from 10 to 30
carbon atoms, and unsaturated hydrocarbon groups having from 10 to 30 carbon atoms.
Preferred are alkyl groups having from 16 to 22 carbon atoms and unsaturated hydrocarbon
groups having from 16 to 22 carbon atoms.
[0023] By "ether compound" is meant a saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbon compound comprising
one or more ether linkages and optionally comprising one or more hydroxyl groups therein,
which compound does not comprise any additional functional groups.
[0024] Also described are ether compounds comprising non-cyclic ethers.
[0025] Preferred ether compounds are those in which R
1 is an alkyl or unsaturated hydrocarbon group having from 10 30 carbon atoms, more
preferably from 16 to 22 carbon atoms and R
2 and R
3 are hydrogen.
[0026] Other preferred ether compounds are those in which R
1 and R
2 are, independently, an alkyl or unsaturated hydrocarbon group having from 10 to 30
carbon atoms, more preferably from 16 to 22 carbon atoms and R
3 is hydrogen.
[0027] Preferred ether compounds also include those in which R
1 and R
3 are, an alkyl or unsaturated hydrocarbon group having from 10 to 30 carbon atoms,
more preferably from 16 to 22 carbon atoms and R
2 is hydrogen.
[0028] Preferred ether compounds also include those in which R
1, R
2 and R
3 are, each independently selected from an alkyl or unsaturated hydrocarbon group having
from 10 to 30 carbon atoms, more preferably from 16 to 22 carbon atoms.
[0029] In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the lubricating oil composition
of the present invention may comprise a mixture of one or more of the afore-mentioned
preferred ether compounds.
[0030] Examples of ether compounds that may be conveniently used in the present invention
include glycerin oleyl monoether, glycerin oleyl diether, glycerin oleyl triether,
glycerin stearyl monoether, glycerin stearyl diether, glycerin stearyl triether and
mixtures thereof.
[0031] A preferred ether compound includes that available under the trade designation "ADEKA
FM-618C" from Asahi Denka Kogyo Co. Ltd.
[0032] In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the one or more ether compounds
are present in an amount in the range of from 0.1 to 5 wt. %, more preferably in the
range of from 0.5 to 4 wt. % and most preferably in the range of from 1 to 1.5 wt.
% based on the total weight of the lubricating oil composition.
[0033] In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, oleylamide is present in an amount
in the range of from 0.05 to 0.5 wt. %, more preferably in the range of from 0.1 to
0.4 wt. % and most preferably in the range of from 0.15 to 0.3 wt. %, based on the
total weight of the lubricating oil composition.
[0034] In a preferred embodiment, the lubricating oil composition of the present invention
further comprises one or more nitrile compounds.
[0035] Preferred nitrile compounds that may be conveniently employed in the present invention
are saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbon compounds containing one or more cyano groups
(-C=N), which compounds preferably do not comprise any additional functional group
substituents.
[0036] Particularly preferred nitrile compounds that may be conveniently employed in the
present invention are branched or linear, saturated or unsaturated aliphatic nitriles.
[0037] Nitrile compounds preferably having from 8 to 24 carbon atoms, more preferably from
10 to 22 carbon atoms, and most preferably from 10 to 18 carbon atoms are preferred.
[0038] Particularly preferred nitrile compounds are saturated or unsaturated linear aliphatic
nitriles having from 8 to 24 carbon atoms, more preferably from 10 to 22 carbon atoms,
and most preferably 10 to 18 carbon atoms.
[0039] Examples of nitrile compounds that may be conveniently used in the present invention
include coconut fatty acid nitriles, oleylnitrile, decanenitrile and tallow nitriles.
[0040] Preferred nitrile compounds that may be conveniently used in the present invention
include that available under the trade designation "ARNEEL 12" (also known under the
trade designation "ARNEEL C") (coconut fatty acid nitrile, a mixture of C10, C12,
C14 and C16 saturated nitriles) from Akzo Nobel, that available under the trade designation
"ARNEEL O" (oleylnitrile) from Akzo Nobel and those available under the trade designations
"ARNEEL 10D" (decanenitrile), "ARNEEL T" (tallow nitriles) and "ARNEEL M" (C
16-22 nitriles) from Akzo Nobel.
[0041] In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the one or more nitrile compounds
are present in an amount in the range of from 0.1 to 0.8 wt. %, more preferably in
the range of from 0.2 to 0.6 wt. % and most preferably in the range of from 0.3 to
0.5 wt. % based on the total weight of the lubricating oil composition.
[0042] The total amount of base oil incorporated in the lubricating oil composition of the
present invention is preferably present in an amount in the range of from 60 to 92
wt. %, more preferably in an amount in the range of from 75 to 90 wt. % and most preferably
in an amount in the range of from 75 to 88 wt. %, with respect to the total weight
of the lubricating oil composition.
[0043] There are no particular limitations regarding the base oil used in the present invention,
and various conventional known mineral oils and synthetic oils may be conveniently
used.
[0044] The base oil used in the present invention may conveniently comprise mixtures of
one or more mineral oils and/or one or more synthetic oils.
[0045] Mineral oils include liquid petroleum oils and solvent-treated or acid-treated mineral
lubricating oil of the paraffinic, naphthenic, or mixed paraffinic/naphthenic type
which may be further refined by hydrofinishing processes and/or dewaxing.
[0046] Naphthenic base oils have low viscosity index (VI) (generally 40-80) and a low pour
point. Such base oils are produced from feedstocks rich in naphthenes and low in wax
content and are used mainly for lubricants in which colour and colour stability are
important, and VI and oxidation stability are of secondary importance.
[0047] Paraffinic base oils have higher VI (generally >95) and a high pour point. Said base
oils are produced from feedstocks rich in paraffins, and are used for lubricants in
which VI and oxidation stability are important.
[0048] Fischer-Tropsch derived base oils may be conveniently used as the base oil in the
lubricating oil composition of the present invention, for example, the Fischer-Tropsch
derived base oils disclosed in
EP-A-776959,
EP-A-668342,
WO-A-97/21788,
WO-00/15736,
WO-00/14188,
WO-00/14187,
WO-00/14183,
WO-00/14179,
WO-00/08115,
WO-99/41332,
EP-1029029,
WO-01/18156 and
WO-01/57166.
[0049] Synthetic processes enable molecules to be built from simpler substances or to have
their structures modified to give the precise properties required.
[0050] Synthetic oils include hydrocarbon oils such as olefin oligomers (PAOs), dibasic
acids esters, polyol esters, and dewaxed waxy raffinate. Synthetic hydrocarbon base
oils sold by the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies under the designation "XHVI"
(trade mark) may be conveniently used.
[0051] Preferably, the base oil constituted from mineral oils and/or synthetic oils which
contain more than 80% wt of saturates, preferably more than 90 % wt., as measured
according to ASTM D2007.
[0052] It is further preferred that the base oil contains less than 1.0 wt. %, preferably
less than 0.1 wt. % of sulphur, calculated as elemental sulphur and measured according
to ASTM D2622, ASTM D4294, ASTM D4927 or ASTM D3120.
[0053] Preferably, the viscosity index of base fluid is more than 80, more preferably more
than 120, as measured according to ASTM D2270.
[0054] Preferably, the lubricating oil has a kinematic viscosity in the range of from 2
to 80 mm
2/s at 100 °C, more preferably of from 3 to 70 mm
2/s, most preferably of from 4 to 50 mm
2/s.
[0055] The total amount of phosphorus in the lubricating oil composition of the present
invention is preferably in the range of from 0.04 to 0.1 wt. %, more preferably in
the range of from 0.04 to 0.09 wt. % and most preferably in the range of from 0.045
to 0.09 wt. %, based on total weight of the lubricating oil composition.
[0056] The lubricating oil composition of the present invention preferably has a sulphated
ash content of not greater than 1.0 wt. %, more preferably not greater than 0.75 wt.
% and most preferably not greater than 0.7 wt. %, based on the total weight of the
lubricating oil composition.
[0057] The lubricating oil composition of the present invention preferably has a sulphur
content of not greater than 1.2 wt. %, more preferably not greater than 0.8 wt. %
and most preferably not greater than 0.2 wt. %, based on the total weight of the lubricating
oil composition.
[0058] The lubricating oil composition of the present invention may further comprise additional
additives such as anti-oxidants, anti-wear additives, detergents, dispersants, friction
modifiers, viscosity index improvers, pour point depressants, corrosion inhibitors,
defoaming agents and seal fix or seal compatibility agents.
[0059] Antioxidants that may be conveniently used include those selected from the group
of aminic antioxidants and/or phenolic antioxidants.
[0060] In a preferred embodiment, said antioxidants are present in an amount in the range
of from 0.1 to 5.0 wt. %, more preferably in an amount in the range of from 0.3 to
3.0 wt. %, and most preferably in an amount of in the range of from 0.5 to 1.5 wt.
%, based on the total weight of the lubricating oil composition.
[0061] Examples of aminic antioxidants which may be conveniently used include alkylated
diphenylamines, phenyl-□-naphthylamines, phenyl-β-naphthylamines and alkylated □-naphthylamines.
[0062] Preferred aminic antioxidants include dialkyldiphenylamines such as p,p'-dioctyl-diphenylamine,
p,p'-di-α-methylbenzyl-diphenylamine and N-p-butylphenyl-N-p'-octylphenylamine, monoalkyldiphenylamines
such as mono-t-butyldiphenylamine and mono-octyldiphenylamine, bis(dialkylphenyl)amines
such as di-(2,4-diethylphenyl)amine and di(2-ethyl-4-nonylphenyl)amine, alkylphenyl-1-naphthylamines
such as octylphenyl-1-naphthylamine and n-t-dodecylphenyl-1-naphthylamine, 1-naphthylamine,
arylnaphthylamines such as phenyl-1-naphthylamine, phenyl-2-naphthylamine, N-hexylphenyl-2-naphthylamine
and N-octylphenyl-2-naphthylamine, phenylenediamines such as N,N'-diisopropyl-p-phenylenediamine
and N,N'-diphenyl-p-phenylenediamine, and phenothiazines such as phenothiazine and
3,7-dioctylphenothiazine.
[0063] Preferred aminic antioxidants include those available under the following trade designations:
"Sonoflex OD-3" (ex. Seiko Kagaku Co.), "Irganox L-57" (ex. Ciba Specialty Chemicals
Co.) and phenothiazine (ex. Hodogaya Kagaku Co.).
[0064] Examples of phenolic antioxidants which may be conveniently used include C7-C9 branched
alkyl esters of 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-4-hydroxy-benzenepropanoic acid, 2-t-butylphenol,
2-t-butyl-4-methylphenol, 2-t-butyl-5-methylphenol, 2,4-di-t-butylphenol, 2,4-dimethyl-6-t-butylphenol,
2-t-butyl-4-methoxyphenol, 3-t-butyl-4-methoxyphenol, 2,5-di-t-butylhydroquinone,
2,6-di-t-butyl-4-alkylphenols such as 2,6-di-t-butylphenol, 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylphenol
and 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-ethylphenol, 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-alkoxyphenols such as 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methoxyphenol
and 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-ethoxyphenol, 3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxybenzylmercaptooctylacetate,
alkyl-3-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionates such as n-octadecyl-3-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate,
n-butyl-3-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate and 2'-ethylhexyl-3-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate,
2,6-d-t-butyl-α-dimethylamino-p-cresol, 2,2'-methylene-bis(4-alkyl-6-t-butylphenol)
such as 2,2'-methylenebis(4-methyl-6-t-butylphenol, and 2,2-methylenebis(4-ethyl-6-t-butylphenol),
bisphenols such as 4,4'-butylidenebis(3-methyl-6-t-butylphenol, 4,4'-methylenebis(2,6-di-t-butylphenol),
4,4'-bis(2,6-di-t-butylphenol), 2,2-(di-p-hydroxyphenyl)propane, 2,2-bis(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propane,
4,4'-cyclohexylidenebis(2,6-t-butylphenol), hexamethyleneglycol-bis[3-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate],
triethyleneglycolbis[3-(3-t-butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)propionate], 2,2'-thio-[diethyl-3-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate],
3,9-bis{1,1-dimethyl-2-[3-(3-t-butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methyl-phenyl)propionyloxy]ethyl}2,4,8,10-tetraoxaspiro[5,5]undecane,
4,4'-thiobis(3-methyl-6-t-butylphenol) and 2,2'-thiobis(4,6-di-t-butylresorcinol),
polyphenols such as tetrakis[methylene-3-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate]methane,
1,1,3-tris(2-methyl-4-hydroxy-5-t-butylphenyl)butane, 1,3,5-trimethyl-2,4,6-tris(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl)benzene,
bis-[3,3'-bis(4'-hydroxy-3'-t-butylphenyl)butyric acid]glycol ester, 2-(3',5'-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl-4-(2",4"-di-t-butyl-3"-hydroxyphenyl)methyl-6-t-butylphenol
and 2,6-bis(2'-hydroxy-3'-t-butyl-5'-methylbenzyl)-4-methylphenol, and p-t-butylphenol
- formaldehyde condensates and p-t-butylphenol - acetaldehyde condensates.
[0065] Preferred phenolic antioxidants include those available under the following trade
designations: "Irganox L-135" (ex. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Co.), "Yoshinox SS" (ex.
Yoshitomi Seiyaku Co.), "Antage W-400" (ex. Kawaguchi Kagaku Co.), "Antage W-500"
(ex. Kawaguchi Kagaku Co.), "Antage W-300" (ex. Kawaguchi Kagaku Co.), "Irganox L109"
(ex. Ciba Speciality Chemicals Co.), "Tominox 917" (ex. Yoshitomi Seiyaku Co.), "Irganox
L115" (ex. Ciba Speciality Chemicals Co.), "Sumilizer GA80" (ex. Sumitomo Kagaku),
"Antage RC" (ex. Kawaguchi Kagaku Co.), "Irganox L101" (ex. Ciba Speciality Chemicals
Co.), "Yoshinox 930" (ex. Yoshitomi Seiyaku Co.).
[0066] The lubricating oil composition of the present invention may comprise mixtures of
one or more phenolic antioxidants with one or more aminic antioxidants.
[0067] In a preferred embodiment, the lubricating oil composition may comprise a single
zinc dithiophosphate or a combination of two or more zinc dithiophosphates as anti-wear
additives, the or each zinc dithiophosphate being selected from zinc dialkyl-, diaryl-
or alkylaryl-dithiophosphates.
[0068] Zinc dithiophosphate is a well known additive in the art and may be conveniently
represented by general formula II;
wherein R
2 to R
5 may be the same or different and are each a primary alkyl group containing from 1
to 20 carbon atoms preferably from 3 to 12 carbon atoms, a secondary alkyl group containing
from 3 to 20 carbon atoms, preferably from 3 to 12 carbon atoms, an aryl group or
an aryl group substituted with an alkyl group, said alkyl substituent containing from
1 to 20 carbon atoms preferably 3 to 18 carbon atoms.
[0069] Zinc dithiophosphate compounds in which R
2 to R
5 are all different from each other can be used alone or in admixture with zinc dithiophosphate
compounds in which R
2 to R
5 are all the same.
[0070] Preferably, the or each zinc dithiophosphate used in the present invention is a zinc
dialkyl dithiophosphate. Examples of suitable zinc dithiophosphates which are commercially
available include those available ex. Lubrizol Corporation under the trade designations
"Lz 1097" and "Lz 1395", those available ex. Chevron Oronite under the trade designations
"OLOA 267" and "OLOA 269R", and that available ex. Afton Chemical under the trade
designation "HITEC 7197"; zinc dithiophosphates such as those available ex. Lubrizol
Corporation under the trade designations "Lz 677A", "Lz 1095" and "Lz 1371", that
available ex. Chevron Oronite under the trade designation "OLOA 262" and that available
ex. Afton Chemical under the trade designation "HITEC 7169"; and zinc dithiophosphates
such as those available ex. Lubrizol Corporation under the trade designations "Lz
1370" and "Lz 1373" and that available ex. Chevron Oronite under the trade designation
"OLOA 260".
[0071] The lubricating oil composition according to the present invention may generally
comprise in the range of from 0.4 to 1.0 wt. % of zinc dithiophosphate, based on total
weight of the lubricating oil composition.
[0072] Additional or alternative anti-wear additives may be conveniently used in the composition
of the present invention.
[0073] Typical detergents that may be used in the lubricating oil of the present invention
include one or more salicylate and/or phenate and/or sulphonate detergents.
[0074] However, as metal organic and inorganic base salts which are used as detergents can
contribute to the sulphated ash content of a lubricating oil composition, in a preferred
embodiment of the present invention, the amounts of such additives are minimised.
[0075] Furthermore, in order to maintain a low sulphur level, salicylate detergents are
preferred.
[0076] Thus, in a preferred embodiment, the lubricating oil composition of the present invention
may comprise one or more salicylate detergents.
[0077] In order to maintain the total sulphated ash content of the lubricating oil composition
of the present invention at a level of preferably not greater than 1.0 wt. %, more
preferably at a level of not greater than 0.75 wt. % and most preferably at a level
of not greater than 0.7 wt. %, based on the total weight of the lubricating oil composition,
said detergents are preferably used in amounts in the range of 0.05 to 12.5 wt. %,
more preferably from 1.0 to 9.0 wt. % and most preferably in the range of from 2.0
to 5.0 wt. %, based on the total weight of the lubricating oil composition.
[0078] Furthermore, it is preferred that said detergents, independently, have a TBN (total
base number) value in the range of from 10 to 500 mg.KOH/g, more preferably in the
range of from 30 to 350 mg.KOH/g and most preferably in the range of from 50 to 300
mg.KOH/g, as measured by ISO 3771.
[0079] The lubricating oil compositions of the present invention may additionally contain
an ash-free dispersant which is preferably admixed in an amount in the range of from
5 to 15 wt. %, based on the total weight of the lubricating oil composition.
[0080] Examples of ash-free dispersants which may be used include the polyalkenyl succinimides
and polyalkenyl succininic acid esters disclosed in Japanese Patent Nos.
1367796,
1667140,
1302811 and
1743435. Preferred dispersants include borated succinimides.
[0081] Examples of viscosity index improvers which may be conveniently used in the lubricating
oil composition of the present invention include the styrene-butadiene copolymers,
styrene-isoprene stellate copolymers and the polymethacrylate copolymer and ethylene-propylene
copolymers. Such viscosity index improvers may be conveniently employed in an amount
in the range of from 1 to 20 wt. %, based on the total weight of the lubricating oil
composition.
[0082] Polymethacrylates may be conveniently employed in the lubricating oil compositions
of the present invention as effective pour point depressants.
[0083] Furthermore, compounds such as alkenyl succinic acid or ester moieties thereof, benzotriazole-based
compounds and thiodiazole-based compounds may be conveniently used in the lubricating
oil composition of the present invention as corrosion inhibitors.
[0084] Compounds such as polysiloxanes, dimethyl polycyclohexane and polyacrylates may be
conveniently used in the lubricating oil composition of the present invention as defoaming
agents.
[0085] Compounds which may be conveniently used in the lubricating oil composition of the
present invention as seal fix or seal compatibility agents include, for example, commercially
available aromatic esters.
[0086] The lubricating oil compositions of the present invention may be conveniently prepared
by admixing oleylamide, one or more ether compounds and, optionally, one or more nitrile
compounds and/or further additives that are usually present in lubricating oil compositions,
for example as herein before described, with a mineral and/or synthetic base oil.
[0087] In another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of lubricating
an internal combustion engine comprising applying a lubricating oil composition as
hereinbefore described thereto.
[0088] The present invention further provides the use of a combination of oleylamide, one
or more ether compounds and, optionally, one or more nitrile compounds in a lubricating
oil composition in order to improve fuel economy and/or friction reduction.
[0089] The present invention is described below with reference to the following Examples,
which are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way.
EXAMPLES
Formulations
[0090] Table 1 indicates the formulations that were tested.
[0091] The formulations in Table 1 comprised conventional detergents, dispersants, pour
point depressants, viscosity modifier, antioxidants and zinc dithiophosphate additives,
which were present as additive packages in diluent oil.
[0092] The base oils used in said formulations were mixtures of polyalphaolefin base oils
(PAO-4 available from BP Amoco under the trade designation "DURASYN 164" and PAO-5
available from Chevron Oronite under the trade designation "SYNFLUID 5") and ester
base oil available under the trade designation "PRIOLUBE 1976" from Uniqema.
[0093] The ether that was used was glycerin oleyl ether available under the trade designation
"ADEKA FM-618C" from Asahi Denka Kogyo Co. Ltd.
[0094] The oleylamide used was that available under the trade designation "UNISLIP 1757"
from Uniqema.
[0095] The glycerol monooleate that was used was that available under the trade designation
"RADIASURF 7149" from Oleon Chemicals.
[0096] The C12 nitrile that was used was that available under the trade designation "ARNEEL
12" from Akzo Nobel.
[0097] All formulations described in Table 1 were SAE 0W20 viscosity grade oils.
Said formulations were manufactured by blending together the components therein in
a single stage blending procedure at a temperature of 70°C. Heating was maintained
for a minimum of 30 minutes to ensure thorough mixing, whilst the solution was mixed
using a paddle stirrer.
TABLE 1
Additive (wt. %) |
Ex. 1 |
Ex. 2 |
Ex. 3 |
Comp. Ex. 1 |
Comp. Ex. 2 |
Comp. Ex. 3 |
Comp. Ex. 4 |
Anti-foam |
30ppm |
30ppm |
30ppm |
30ppm |
30ppm |
30ppm |
30ppm |
Additive package1 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
Ether |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
- |
1.5 |
- |
- |
Oleylamide |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
- |
0.2 |
- |
Glycerol Monooleate |
- |
- |
- |
1.5 |
- |
- |
- |
C12 Nitrile |
- |
- |
0.5 |
- |
- |
- |
0.5 |
PAO-4 Base Oil |
17.4 |
17.4 |
17.4 |
17.4 |
17.4 |
17.4 |
17.4 |
PAO-5 Base Oil |
57.3 |
56.8 |
56.8 |
57.3 |
57.5 |
58.8 |
58.5 |
Ester Base Oil |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
1 Conventional additive package containing calcium salicylate detergents having TBNs
of 165 mg.KOH/g and 280 mg.KOH/g, dispersant, pour point depressant, viscosity modifier,
aminic and phenolic antioxidants, zinc dithiophosphate additives and diluent oil. |
Mini-Traction Machine (MTM) Test
[0099] Friction coefficients were measured with the Mini-Traction Machine using the 'ball-on-disc'
configuration.
[0100] The ball specimen was a polished steel ball bearing, 19.05 mm in diameter. The disc
specimen was a polished bearing steel disc, 46 mm in diameter and 6 mm thick.
[0101] The ball specimen was secured concentrically on a motor driven shaft. The disc specimen
was secured concentrically on another motor driven shaft. The ball was loaded against
the disc to create a point contact area with minimum spin and skew components. At
the point of contact, a slide to roll ratio of 100% was maintained by adjusting the
surface speed of the ball and disc.
[0102] The tests were run at a pressure of 1.25 GPa (load of 71N) or 0.82 GPa (load of 20N)
with variable temperatures and mean surface speeds as detailed in the results tables.
Results and Discussion
[0103] The formulations described in Table 1 were tested using the afore-mentioned test
and the results obtained thereon are detailed below:
Testing under High Load/High Temperature Conditions
[0104] The formulations of Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3 were tested
in the MTM test under high load (1.25 GPa) and high temperature conditions (105 °C
and 125 °C) under a variety of speeds (1000, 500, 100 and 50 mm/s).
[0105] Friction coefficients were measured and are described in Table 2.
TABLE 2
MTM Test Conditions |
Comp. Ex. 1 |
Ex. 1 |
Ex. 2 |
Comp. Ex. 2 |
Comp. Ex. 3 |
Temp. (°C) |
Speed (mm/s) |
Friction Coefficient |
125 |
1000 |
0.0386 |
0.0282 |
0.0272 |
0.0293 |
0.0722 |
125 |
500 |
0.0524 |
0.0365 |
0.0355 |
0.0395 |
0.0909 |
125 |
100 |
0.0811 |
0.0627 |
0.0620 |
0.0654 |
0.1106 |
125 |
50 |
0.0899 |
0.0706 |
0.0695 |
0.0726 |
0.1103 |
105 |
1000 |
0.0429 |
0.0295 |
0.0289 |
0.0305 |
0.0669 |
105 |
500 |
0.0552 |
0.0362 |
0.0352 |
0.0385 |
0.0842 |
105 |
100 |
0.0832 |
0.0624 |
0.0613 |
0.0648 |
0.1090 |
105 |
50 |
0.0920 |
0.0710 |
0.0700 |
0.0730 |
0.1119 |
[0106] Table 3 details the mean % friction reduction for the formulations of Examples 1
and 2 and Comparative Examples 2 and 3, relative to the mean friction coefficients
measured for the formulation of Comparative Example 1 at medium speeds (i.e. 1000,
500, 100, 50 mm/s) under the tested high load conditions.
[0107] Positive values in Table 3 indicate improved friction reduction (i.e. lower friction
coefficients) relative to the mean friction coefficients measured for the formulation
of Comparative Example 1 and negative values in Table 3 indicate worse friction reduction
(i.e. increased friction coefficients) relative to the mean friction coefficients
measured for the formulation of Comparative Example 1.
TABLE 3
|
Ex. 1 |
Ex. 2 |
Comp. Ex. 2 |
Comp. Ex. 3 |
Temp. (°C) |
Mean Friction Reduction (%)2 |
125 |
+ 25.4 |
+ 27.0 |
+ 21.8 |
- 54.9 |
105 |
+ 28.4 |
+ 29.8 |
+ 25.5 |
- 40.3 |
2 Relative mean friction coefficients measured for the formulation of Comparative
Example 1.
[0108] Table 4 details the mean % friction reduction for the formulations of Examples 1
and 2 and Comparative Examples 2 and 3, relative to the mean friction coefficients
measured for the formulation of Comparative Example 1 at high temperatures (i.e. 125
°C and 105 °C) under the tested high load conditions.
[0109] Positive values in Table 4 indicate improved friction reduction (i.e. lower friction
coefficients) relative to the mean friction coefficients measured for the formulation
of Comparative Example 1 and negative values in Table 4 indicate worse friction reduction
(i.e. increased friction coefficients) relative to the mean friction coefficients
measured for the formulation of Comparative Example 1.
TABLE 4
|
Ex. 1 |
Ex. 2 |
Comp. Ex. 2 |
Comp. Ex. 3 |
Speed (mm/s) |
Mean Friction Reduction (%) 3 |
1000 |
+ 29.1 |
+ 31.1 |
+ 26.5 |
- 71.5 |
500 |
+ 32.4 |
+ 34.2 |
+ 27.4 |
- 63.0 |
100 |
+ 23.8 |
+ 24.9 |
+ 20.7 |
- 33.7 |
50 |
+ 22.1 |
+ 23.3 |
+ 19.9 |
- 22.2 |
3 Relative mean friction coefficients measured for the formulation of Comparative
Example 1.
[0110] It is apparent from Tables 3 and 4 that the oleylamide/ether combinations of Examples
1 and 2 show synergistic friction reduction.
[0111] The improvement in friction reduction of the ether upon addition of oleylamide ranges
from 3 to 7 % depending upon the conditions used.
[0112] The results of Table 4 are represented graphically in Figure 1. It is apparent from
Figure 1 that whilst it would be expected from the results of Comparative Examples
2 and 3 that the use of oleylamide in conjunction with ether would result in worse
friction reduction than in Comparative Example 2, Examples 1 and 2 surprisingly indicate
that not only is there no deterioration in the friction reduction performance using
such a combination, but also that there is further improvement in the friction reduction
performance by using such combination.
Testing under Low Load/Low Temperature Conditions
[0113] The formulations of Examples 1 and 3 and Comparative Examples 1 and 4 were tested
in the MTM test under low load (0.82 GPa) and low temperature conditions (105 °C,
70 °C and 45 °C) under a variety of low speeds (500, 100, 50 and 10 mm/s).
[0114] Friction coefficients were measured and are described in Table 5.
TABLE 5
MTM Test Conditions |
Comp. Ex. 1 |
Ex. 1 |
Ex. 3 |
Comp. Ex. 4 |
Temp. (°C) |
Speed (mm/s) |
Friction Coefficient |
105 |
500 |
0.0475 |
0.0259 |
0.0264 |
0.1055 |
105 |
100 |
0.0833 |
0.0634 |
0.0622 |
0.1266 |
105 |
50 |
0.0939 |
0.0754 |
0.0734 |
0.1286 |
105 |
10 |
0.0990 |
0.0800 |
0.0777 |
0.1299 |
70 |
500 |
0.0383 |
0.0279 |
0.0272 |
0.0766 |
70 |
100 |
0.0693 |
0.0519 |
0.0492 |
0.1192 |
70 |
50 |
0.0816 |
0.0677 |
0.0645 |
0.1245 |
70 |
10 |
0.0979 |
0.0871 |
0.0824 |
0.1294 |
45 |
500 |
0.0383 |
0.0344 |
0.0333 |
0.0528 |
45 |
100 |
0.0598 |
0.0433 |
0.0415 |
0.1019 |
45 |
50 |
0.0721 |
0.0563 |
0.0533 |
0.1155 |
45 |
10 |
0.0944 |
0.0856 |
0.0806 |
0.1275 |
[0115] Table 6 details the mean % friction reduction for the formulations of Examples 1
and 3 and Comparative Example 4, relative to the mean friction coefficients measured
for the formulation of Comparative Example 1 at low speeds (i.e. 500, 100, 50, 10
mm/s) under the tested low load conditions.
[0116] Positive values in Table 6 indicate improved friction reduction (i.e. lower friction
coefficients) relative to the mean friction coefficients measured for the formulation
of Comparative Example 1 and negative values in Table 6 indicate worse friction reduction
(i.e. increased friction coefficients) relative to the mean friction coefficients
measured for the formulation of Comparative Example 1.
TABLE 6
|
Ex. 1 |
Ex. 3 |
Comp. Ex. 4 |
Temp. (°C) |
Mean Friction Reduction (%)4 |
105 |
+ 27.1 |
+ 28.3 |
- 60.6 |
70 |
+ 20.1 |
+ 23.7 |
- 64.2 |
45 |
+ 17.3 |
+ 21.1 |
- 50.9 |
4 Relative mean friction coefficients measured for the formulation of Comparative
Example 1.
[0117] Table 7 details the mean % friction reduction for the formulations of Examples 1
and 3 and Comparative Example 4, relative to the mean friction coefficients measured
for the formulation of Comparative Example 1 at low temperatures (i.e. 105 °C, 70
°C, 45 °C) under the tested low load conditions.
[0118] Positive values in Table 7 indicate improved friction reduction (i.e. lower friction
coefficients) relative to the mean friction coefficients measured for the formulation
of Comparative Example 1 and negative values in Table 7 indicate worse friction reduction
(i.e. increased friction coefficients) relative to the mean friction coefficients
measured for the formulation of Comparative Example 1.
TABLE 7
|
Ex. 1 |
Ex. 3 |
Comp. Ex. 4 |
Speed (mm/s) |
Mean Friction Reduction (%)5 |
500 |
+ 27.6 |
+ 28.8 |
- 86.7 |
100 |
+ 25.5 |
+ 28.3 |
- 64.8 |
50 |
+ 19.6 |
+ 23.0 |
- 49.9 |
10 |
+ 13.2 |
+ 17.3 |
- 32.8 |
5 Relative mean friction coefficients measured for the formulation of Comparative
Example 1.
[0119] It is apparent from Tables 6 and 7 that the oleylamide/ether/nitrile combinations
of Example 3 show synergistic friction reduction under low load conditions.