Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a phosphor and a light-emitting device, and particularly
to a silicate-based phosphor and a light-emitting device using the same.
Background Art
[0002] Conventionally, a two-color mixed type white LED to obtain white light by mixing
blue and yellow in combination of a semiconductor light-emitting element emitting
blue light and a yellow phosphor has been widely used. However, white light emitted
by the two-color mixed type white LED has a low purity disadvantageously. Therefore,
recently, a three-color mixed type white LED to obtain white light by mixing blue,
green, and red by exciting three types of blue, green, and red phosphors with light
emitted by a semiconductor light-emitting element to emit ultraviolet light (wavelength
of 350 to 430 nm) in combination of the semiconductor light-emitting element and the
phosphors has been developed.
[0003] Conventionally, green phosphors having various compositions have been developed.
For example, Patent Literature 1 describes a phosphor corresponding to (Ba,Sr)
2SiO
4:Eu as a green phosphor used in an LED or the like. This Literature describes that
at least one of an alkali metal element, an alkaline earth metal element, Zn, Y, Al,
Sc, P, N, a rare earth element, and a halogen element is contained as a trace element
and that the content of the trace element is usually from 1 ppm to 100 ppm, but does
not describe Example in which the trace element is added.
[0004] Patent Literature 2 describes a silicate green light-emitting phosphor obtained by
activating strontium barium silicate with europium, in which the content of magnesium
is from 0.15 to 0.90 moles relative to 1 mole of the content of silicon.
Citation List
Patent Literature
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0006] The green phosphor described in Patent Literature 1 has an insufficient light-emitting
characteristic, particularly has a low internal quantum efficiency and a low external
quantum efficiency disadvantageously. The silicate green light-emitting phosphor described
in Patent Literature 2 has a high stability of a light-emitting intensity with respect
to heat, but further improvement in a light-emitting characteristic is expected.
[0007] An object of the present invention is to provide a phosphor having a better light-emitting
characteristic, particularly a better external quantum efficiency than a conventional
phosphor, and a light-emitting device using the same.
Solution to Problem
[0008] The present inventors made intensive studies in order to achieve the above object.
As a result, the present inventors have found that a phosphor obtained by activating
strontium barium silicate with europium can exhibit an excellent light-emitting characteristic
due to addition of a predetermined group 3 element.
[0009] That is, the present invention relates to a phosphor represented by a composition
of the following formula (1),
(Sr
a,Ba
b,Ca
c,Eu
x,M
1d,M
2e)SiO
f·gMgO ··· formula (1)
(here, M
1 represents at least one group 3 element selected from Lu and Sc, M
2 represents an alkali metal element selected from Li, Na, and K, and 0 < a ≤ 2, 0
< b ≤ 2, 0 ≤ c ≤ 2, 0.0015 ≤ d ≤ 0.045, 0 ≤ e ≤ 0.06, 0 < x ≤ 0.1, 3.7 ≤ f ≤ 4.1,
and 0 ≤ g ≤ 1 are satisfied).
[0010] In addition, the present invention relates to a light-emitting device including the
phosphor and a light source for irradiating the phosphor with excitation light to
cause the phosphor to emit light.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0011] The present invention can provide a phosphor having an excellent light-emitting characteristic,
particularly an excellent external quantum efficiency, and a light-emitting device
using the same.
Description of Embodiments
1. Phosphor
[0012] A phosphor of the present invention is represented by a composition of the following
formula (1),
(Sr
a,Ba
b,Ca
c,Eu
x,M
1d,M
2e)SiO
f·gMgO ··· formula (1)
(here, M
1 represents at least one group 3 element selected from Lu and Sc, M
2 represents an alkali metal element selected from Li, Na, and K, and 0 < a ≤ 2, 0
< b ≤ 2, 0 ≤ c ≤ 2, 0.0015 ≤ d ≤ 0.045, 0 ≤ e ≤ 0.06, 0 < x ≤ 0.1, 3.7 ≤ f ≤ 4.1,
and 0 ≤ g ≤ 1 are satisfied).
[0013] In other words, the phosphor of the present invention is a silicate green phosphor
obtained by activating an alkaline earth metal silicate with europium, containing
at least one group 3 element (M
1) selected from lutetium (Lu) and scandium (Sc) and magnesium (Mg) as an optional
component.
[0014] In formula (1), M
1 is at least one group 3 element selected from Lu and Sc, and may contain only Lu
and Sc or may contain two or more kinds thereof. Of these elements, Lu is more preferable
due to a high internal quantum efficiency or a high external quantum efficiency.
[0015] A molar ratio of M
1 relative to 1 mole of Si, that is, the value of d is within a range of 0.0015 ≤ d
≤ 0.045, preferably within a range of 0.002 ≤ d ≤ 0.04, and more preferably within
a range of 0.008 ≤ d ≤ 0.03. Even when the value of d is less than 0.0015 or more
than 0.045, the internal quantum efficiency or the external quantum efficiency is
lowered, and a light-emitting characteristic is easily deteriorated. Note that the
content of M
1 is preferably from 1000 to 25000 ppm, and more preferably from 4000 to 15000 ppm
relative to the total amount of the phosphor based on a mass. Even when the content
of M
1 is less than 1000 ppm or more than 25000 ppm, the internal quantum efficiency or
the external quantum efficiency is lowered, and a light-emitting characteristic is
easily deteriorated. The content of M
1 can be calculated from a mixing ratio of raw materials.
[0016] A molar ratio of strontium relative to 1 mole of Si, that is, the value of a is
within a range of 0 < a ≤ 2, preferably within a range of 0.1 ≤ a ≤ 1.9, more preferably
within a range of 1 ≤ a ≤ 1.5, and particularly preferably within a range of 0.96
≤ a ≤ 1.2. As the value of a is closer to zero, a full width at half maximum of a
light-emitting spectrum is easily narrower. When the value of a is 2 or more, a light-emitting
intensity is easily lowered.
[0017] A molar ratio of barium relative to 1 mole of Si, that is, the value of b is within
a range of 0 < b ≤ 2, preferably within a range of 0.1 ≤ b ≤ 1.9, more preferably
within a range of 0.5 ≤ b ≤ 0.98, and particularly preferably within a range of 0.6
≤ b ≤ 0.96. As the value of b is closer to zero, a light-emitting intensity is easily
lowered. When the value of b is 1 or more, a full width at half maximum of a light-emitting
spectrum is easily narrower.
[0018] In the present invention, calcium (Ca) can be contained as an optional component.
A molar ratio of calcium relative to 1 mole of Si, that is, the value of c is within
a range of 0 ≤ c ≤ 2, and is usually c = 0 is satisfied.
[0019] Europium is an activating agent, and emits light as a light-emitting atom in a phosphor.
A molar ratio of europium relative to 1 mole of Si, that is, the value of x is within
a range of 0 < x ≤ 0.1, preferably within a range of 0.01 ≤ x ≤ 0.07, and more preferably
within a range of 0.03 ≤ x ≤ 0.04. As the value of x is closer to zero, the number
of the light-emitting atoms is less, and therefore a light-emitting intensity is easily
lowered. When the value of x is 0.1 or more, the light-emitting atoms have a high
concentration, and cancel light-emission to each other due to being close to each
other, and therefore a light-emitting intensity is easily lowered.
[0020] a + b + c + x + d + e preferably satisfies 1.7 ≤ a + b + c + x + d + e ≤ 2.1, more
preferably satisfies 1.8 ≤ a + b + c + x + d + e ≤ 2.0, and particularly preferably
satisfies a + b + c + x + d + e = 1.9.
[0021] In the present invention, magnesium is an optional component. However, a case where
the phosphor contains magnesium is preferable because the internal quantum efficiency
or the external quantum efficiency of the phosphor is higher than a case where the
phosphor contains no magnesium. A molar ratio of magnesium relative to 1 mole of Si,
that is, the value of g is within a range of 0 ≤ g ≤ 1, preferably within a range
of 0.15 ≤ g ≤ 0. 90, and more preferably within a range of 0.20 ≤ g ≤ 0.80. A case
of c = 0 has a composition containing no magnesium. Note that a phosphor containing
magnesium is a mixture of a silicate phosphor containing no Mg, such as a phosphor
represented by " (Sr
a, Ba
b, Ca
c, M
1d, M
2e) SiO
f:Eu
x" or a phosphor represented by " (Sr
a-α, Ba
b-β, Ca
c-γ, M
1d, Mg
α+β+γ) SiO
f: Eu
x" (0 ≤ α + β + γ ≤ 0.2)", and MgO or the like. For example, the phosphor containing
magnesium can be obtained by firing raw materials in a manufacturing method described
below such that a molar ratio of the raw materials is strontium element:barium element:calcium
element :magnesium element:M
1 element:M
2 element:silicon element:europium element = a:b:c:g:d:e:1:x.
[0022] In the present invention, an alkali metal element (M
2) can be further contained as an optional component. The alkali metal element is preferably
contained in the phosphor because the alkali metal element sensitizes M
1 as a group 3 element in the phosphor to improve an internal quantum efficiency or
an external quantum efficiency. The alkali metal element is preferably at least one
selected from lithium (Li), sodium (Na), and potassium (K). The molar content of the
alkali metal element contained in the phosphor is preferably the same as that of M
1 (1:1 in a molar ratio, that is, e = d) when a molar ratio of the alkali metal element
relative to 1 mole of Si is e. When an alkali metal (element M
2) is contained, the content thereof is preferably within a range of 0.001 ≤ e ≤ 0.06,
more preferably within a range of 0.0015 ≤ e ≤ 0.05, and particularly preferably within
a range of 0.0025 ≤ e ≤ 0.03. Note that a case of e = 0 has a composition containing
no alkali metal element.
[0023] Note that when the phosphor of the present invention contains no alkali metal element
(M
2), the phosphor can be represented by the following formula (2).
(Sr
a,Ba
b,Ca
c,Eu
x,M
1d)SiO
f·gMgO ··· formula (2)
(here, M
1 represents at least one group 3 element selected from Lu and Sc, and 0 < a ≤ 2, 0
< b ≤ 2, 0 ≤ c ≤ 2, 0.0015 ≤ d ≤ 0.045, 0 < x ≤ 0.1, 3.7 ≤ f ≤ 4.1, and 0 ≤ g ≤ 1
are satisfied).
[0024] In formula (1), 3.7 ≤ f ≤ 4.1 is satisfied, 3.8 ≤ f ≤ 4.0 is preferably satisfied,
and f = 3.9 is more preferably satisfied. When f is less than 3.7 or more than 4.1,
a light-emitting efficiency is easily lowered.
[0025] The phosphor of the present invention emits green light having a peak wavelength
within a range of 510 to 530 nm when being excited with light having a wavelength
of 400 nm. Furthermore, the phosphor of the present invention preferably emits blue
light having a peak wavelength within a range of 435 to 450 nm together with the green
light. The light-emitting intensity of the blue light is preferably within a range
of 0.0015 to 0.020, particularly preferably within a range of 0.005 to 0.010 when
the light-emitting intensity of the green light is assumed to be 1.
[0026] As described above, the phosphor of the present invention contains at least one group
3 element selected from Lu and Sc, has the composition of formula (1), and therefore
has a better light-emitting characteristic indicated particularly by an internal quantum
efficiency or an external quantum efficiency than a conventional phosphor. The internal
quantum efficiency means the number of generated photons relative to the number of
absorbed excitation photons. On the other hand, the external quantum efficiency means
the number of externally generated photons relative to the number of irradiated photons,
and can be calculated by a formula "internal quantum efficiency x absorption ratio".
The external quantum efficiency means the light-emitting amount relative to the number
of photons irradiated by an excitation source. Therefore, particularly in a light-emitting
device such as a white LED, the external quantum efficiency is a more important parameter
than the internal quantum efficiency. The phosphor of the present invention has a
better external quantum efficiency than a conventional phosphor when being excited
with light of 390 to 420 nm. Specifically, when the phosphor of the present invention
is excited with excitation light having a wavelength of 400 nm, the phosphor of the
present invention can have an external quantum efficiency of 65.8% or more, preferably
of 67% or more, and more preferably of 68% or more. Here, the external quantum efficiency
can be calculated by a method described in Examples described below.
2. Method for manufacturing phosphor
[0027] The phosphor of the present invention can be manufactured by a method for mixing
a strontium compound powder, a barium compound powder, a calcium compound powder,
a silicon compound powder, a M
1-containing compound powder, and a europium compound powder, optionally mixing a magnesium
compound powder and/or a M
2-containing compound powder, and firing the resulting powdery mixture.
[0028] Each of raw material powders of the strontium compound powder, the barium compound
powder, the calcium compound powder, the silicon compound powder, the M
1-containing compound powder, the europium compound powder, the M
2-containing compound powder, and the magnesium compound powder may be an oxide powder
or a powder of a compound to generate an oxide by heating, such as a hydroxide, a
halide, a carbonate (including a basic carbonate), a nitrate, or an oxalate.
[0029] Specific examples of the strontium compound powder are not particularly limited.
However, for example, at least one selected from the group consisting of strontium
carbonate (SrCO
3), strontium hydroxide (Sr(OH)
2), strontium fluoride (SrF
2), strontium bromide (SrBr
2), strontium chloride (SrCl
2), and strontium iodide (SrI
2) can be used.
[0030] Specific examples of the barium compound powder are not particularly limited. However,
for example, at least one selected from the group consisting of barium carbonate (BaCO
3), barium hydroxide (Ba(OH)
2), barium fluoride (BaF
2), barium bromide (BaBr
2), barium chloride (BaCl
2), and barium iodide (BaI
2) can be used.
[0031] Specific examples of the calcium compound powder are not particularly limited. However,
for example, at least one selected from the group consisting of calcium carbonate
(CaCO
3), calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)
2), calcium fluoride (CaF
2), calcium bromide (CaBr
2), calcium chloride (CaCl
2), and calcium iodide (CaI
2) can be used.
[0032] Specific examples of the silicon compound powder are not particularly limited. However,
for example, at least one selected from the group consisting of silicon dioxide (SiO
2), orthosilicic acid (H
4SiO
4), metasilicic acid (H
2SiO
3), and metadisilicic acid (H
2Si
2O
5 can be used.
[0033] Specific examples of the magnesium compound powder are not particularly limited.
However, for example, at least one selected from the group consisting of magnesium
oxide (MgO), magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)
2), and magnesium carbonate (MgCO
3) can be used.
[0034] The M
1-containing compound powder can be selected from a lutetium compound powder, a scandium
compound powder, and a mixed powder of two or more kinds thereof. Specific examples
of the lutetium compound powder are not particularly limited. However, for example,
lutetium (III) oxide (Lu
2O
3) can be used. Specific examples of the scandium compound powder are not particularly
limited. However, for example, scandium (III) oxide (Sc
2O
3) can be used.
[0035] The M
2-containing compound powder can be selected from a lithium compound powder, a sodium
compound powder, a potassium compound powder, and a mixed powder of two or more kinds
thereof. Specific examples of the lithium compound powder are not particularly limited.
However, for example, lithium carbonate (Li
2CO
3) can be used.
[0036] Specific examples of the europium compound powder are not particularly limited. However,
for example, at least one selected from the group consisting of europium (III) oxide
(Eu
2O
3), europium (II) oxide (EuO), and europium (III) hydroxide (Eu(OH)
3) can be used.
[0037] These raw material powders may be used singly or in combination of two or more kinds
thereof. Each of the raw material powders preferably has a purity of 99% by mass or
more.
[0038] A mixing ratio of the raw material powders is almost directly a composition ratio
of formula (1). Therefore, the mixing ratio is adjusted so as to obtain a desired
composition ratio. That is, a strontium compound powder is mixed such that the molar
number of a strontium element is a relative to 1 mole of the content of silicon in
the raw material powders. The other compound powders are similar.
[0039] A flux may be added to a mixture of the raw material powders. The flux is preferably
a halide, and is particularly preferably a chloride. A chloride powder is preferably
used for a part of the raw material powders as the flux. A strontium chloride powder
is particularly preferably used. The addition amount of the flux is such an amount
that the halogen amount is preferably within a range of 0.0001 to 0.5 moles, particularly
preferably within a range of 0.01 to 0.5 moles when the silicon content in the powdery
mixture is 1 mole.
[0040] Both a dry mixing method and a wet mixing method can be employed as a method for
mixing the raw material powders. When the raw material powders are mixed by the wet
mixing method, a rotating ball mill, a vibrating ball mill, a planetary mill, a paint
shaker, a rocking mill, a rocking mixer, a bead mill, a stirrer, and the like can
be used. Water or a lower alcohol such as ethanol or isopropyl alcohol can be used
as a solvent.
[0041] The powdery mixture is preferably fired under a reducing gas atmosphere. As the reducing
gas, a mixed gas of 0.5 to 5.0% by volume hydrogen and a 99.5 to 95.0% by volume inert
gas can be used. Examples of the inert gas include argon and/or nitrogen. A firing
temperature is generally within a range of 900 to 1300°C. Firing time is generally
within a range of 0.5 to 100 hours, and preferably within a range of 0.5 to 10 hours.
[0042] When the powder of a compound to generate an oxide by heating is used as the raw
material powder, a powdery mixture is preferably calcined under an air atmosphere
at a temperature of 600 to 850°C for 0.5 to 100 hours before being fired under a reducing
gas atmosphere. Calcination time is particularly preferably within a range of 0.5
to 10 hours. A phosphor obtained by firing may be subjected to a classification treatment,
an acid washing treatment with a mineral acid such as hydrochloric acid or nitric
acid, or a baking treatment, as necessary.
3. Light-emitting device
[0043] The phosphor of the present invention can be used for various light-emitting devices.
A light-emitting device of the present invention includes at least the phosphor represented
by the above formula (1) and a light source for irradiating the phosphor with excitation
light to cause the phosphor to emit light. Specific examples of the light-emitting
device include a white light-emitting diode (LED), a fluorescent lamp, a vacuum fluorescent
display (VFD), a cathode ray tube (CRT), a plasma display panel (PDP), and a field
emission display (FED). Among these devices, the white LED is a light-emitting device
including the phosphor of the present invention (green phosphor), a red phosphor,
a blue phosphor, and a semiconductor light-emitting element to emit ultraviolet light,
for example, having a wavelength of 350 to 430 nm, and exciting these phosphors with
ultraviolet light emitted by the light-emitting element to obtain white by mixing
green, red, and blue.
[0044] Examples of the blue light-emitting phosphor include (Ba,Sr,Ca)
3MgSi
2O
8:Eu, (Ba,Sr,Ca)MgAl
10O
17:Eu, and (Ba,Sr,Mg, Ca)
10(PO
4)
6(Cl,F)
2:Eu. Examples of the red light-emitting phosphor include (Ba,Sr,Ca)
3MgSi
2O
8:Eu,Mn, Y
2O
2S:Eu, La
2O
3S:Eu, (Ca,Sr,Ba)
2Si
5N
8:Eu, CaAlSiN
3:Eu, Eu
2W
2O
9, (Ca,Sr,Ba)
2Si
5N
8:Eu,Mn, CaTiO
3:Pr,Bi, and (La,Eu)
2W
3O
12. Examples of the semiconductor light-emitting element include an AlGaN-based semiconductor
light-emitting element. Patent Literature 2 can be referred to for details of the
light-emitting device.
Examples
[0045] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described specifically based on Examples,
but an object of the present invention is not limited thereby.
1. Method for evaluating characteristic of phosphor
[0046] A method for evaluating various characteristics of a phosphor is as follows.
<Absorption ratio, internal quantum efficiency, and external quantum efficiency>
2. Experimental Example 1: M1 = Lu
(Example 1: Sr1.013Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.002SiO3.901·0.3MgO)
[0048] A strontium carbonate powder (purity: 99.8% by mass, average particle diameter: 2.73
µm), a barium carbonate powder (purity: 99.8% by mass, average particle diameter:
1.26 µm), a dieuropium trioxide powder (purity: 99.9% by mass, average particle diameter:
2.71 µm), a silicon dioxide powder (purity: 99. 9% by mass, average particle diameter:
3.87 µm), a magnesium oxide powder (manufactured by a gas phase method, purity: 99.98%
by mass, BET specific surface area: 8 m
2/g), a strontium fluoride powder (purity: 99.9% by mass), a strontium bromide powder
(purity: 99.9% by mass), lutetium (III) oxide (purity: 99.9% by mass) were weighed
such that a molar ratio of SrCO
3:BaCO
3:Eu
2O
3:SiO
2:MgO:SrF
2:SrBr
2:Lu
2O
3 was 0.993:0.85:0.0175:1:0.3:0.01:0.01:0.001 (Table 1). Note that an average particle
diameter of each of the raw material powders was measured by a laser diffraction scattering
method.
[0049] Each of the weighed raw material powders was put in a ball mill together with pure
water, and was mixed in a wet manner for 24 hours to obtain a slurry of a powdery
mixture. The resulting slurry was spray-dried with a spray dryer to obtain a powdery
mixture having an average particle diameter of 40 µm. The resulting powdery mixture
was put in an alumina crucible, was fired at a temperature of 800°C in an air atmosphere
for 3 hours, and then was cooled to room temperature. Thereafter, the resulting product
was fired in a mixed gas atmosphere of 2% by volume of hydrogen-98% by volume of argon
at a temperature of 1200°C for 6 hours to obtain a phosphor (Sr
1.013Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Lu
0.002SiO
3.9·0.3MgO).
[0050] An absorption ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof,
and an external quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. As a result,
the absorption ratio was 81.2%, the internal quantum efficiency was 81.0%, and the
external quantum efficiency was 65.8%. Table 2 indicates these results. Note that
the oxygen number in each composition is a theoretical value calculated by assuming
that each of Sr, Ba, Eu, Si, and Mg has the valence number of two, and M
1 has the valence number of three.
(Example 2: Sr1.011Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.004SiO3.902·0.3MgO)
[0051] A phosphor (Sr
1.011Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Lu
0.004SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders in Example 1 were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1. An absorption
ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external
quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
(Example 3: Sr1.009Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.006SiO3.903·0.3MgO)
[0052] A phosphor (Sr
1.009Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Lu
0.002SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders in Example 1 were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1. An absorption
ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external
quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
(Example 4: Sr1.007Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.008SiO3.904·0.3MgO)
[0053] A phosphor (Sr
1.007Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Lu
0.008SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders in Example 1 were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1. An absorption
ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external
quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
(Example 5: Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.01SiO3.905·0.3MgO)
[0054] A phosphor (Sr
1.005Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Lu
0.01SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders in Example 1 were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1. An absorption
ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external
quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
(Example 6: Sr1.003Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.12SiO3.906·0.3MgO)
[0055] A phosphor (Sr
1.003Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Lu
0.012SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders in Example 1 were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1. An absorption
ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external
quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
(Example 7: Sr0.995Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.02SiO3.91·0.3MgO)
[0056] A phosphor (Sr
0.995Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Lu
0.02SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders in Example 1 were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1. An absorption
ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external
quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
(Example 8: Sr0.985Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.03SiO3.915·0.3MgO)
[0057] A phosphor Sr
0.985Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Lu
0.03SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders in Example 1 were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1. An absorption
ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external
quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
(Example 9: Sr0.975Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.04SiO3.92·0.3MgO)
[0058] A phosphor (Sr
0.975Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Lu
0.04SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders in Example 1 were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1. An absorption
ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external
quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
(Comparative Example 1: Sr1015Ba0.85Eu0.035SiO3.9·0.3MgO)
[0059] A phosphor (Sr
1015Ba
0.85Eu
0.035SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1 without addition of lutetium
(III) oxide in Example 1. An absorption ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal
quantum efficiency thereof, and an external quantum efficiency thereof were measured
and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
(Comparative Example 2: Sr1.014Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.001SiO3.9005·0.3MgO)
[0060] A phosphor (Sr
1.014Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Lu
0.001SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders in Example 1 were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1. An absorption
ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external
quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
(Comparative Example 3: Sr0.965Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.05SiO3.925·0.3MgO)
[0061] A phosphor (Sr
0.965Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Lu
0.05SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders in Example 1 were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1. An absorption
ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external
quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
[0062] The above results indicate the following. That is, when Comparative Example 1 containing
no lutetium or Comparative Example 2 in which the content of lutetium is 0.001 (molar
ratio relative to 1 mole of silicon, hereinafter, the same) is compared to Examples
1 to 9 in which the content of lutetium is 0.002 or more, both the internal quantum
efficiencies and the external quantum efficiencies in Examples 1 to 9 are better than
those in Comparative Examples 1 and 2. Therefore, it is found that the content of
lutetium is preferably 0.0015 or more, and particularly preferably 0.002 or more.
On the other hand, even when Comparative Example 3 in which the content of lutetium
is 0.05 is compared to Examples 1 to 9, both the internal quantum efficiencies and
the external quantum efficiencies in Examples 1 to 9 are better than those in Comparative
Example 3. Therefore, it is found that the content of lutetium is preferably 0.045
or less, and particularly preferably 0.04 or less.
3. Experimental Example 2: M1 = Sc
(Example 10: Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035SC0.01SiO3.905·0.3MgO)
[0063] A phosphor (Sr
1.005Ba
0.85Eu
0.035Sc
0.01SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 5 except that the raw material
powders were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1 using scandium (III)
oxide in place of lutetium (III) oxide in Example 5. An absorption ratio of the resulting
phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external quantum efficiency
thereof were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
[0064] The above results indicate the following. That is, when Comparative Example 1 containing
no scandium is compared to Example 10 in which the content of scandium is 0.01, the
external quantum efficiencies in Examples 1 to 9 are better than that in Comparative
Example 1. Therefore, it has been found that even in case where scandium is contained
in place of lutetium, a phosphor has an excellent external quantum efficiency. Note
that the result in Example 5 containing lutetium the molar ratio of which is the same
as that of scandium in Example 10 indicates that lutetium exhibits a better internal
quantum efficiency and a better external quantum efficiency than scandium.
4. Experimental Example 3: M1 = various metal elements
(Comparative Examples 4 to 11)
[0065] A phosphor was obtained in a similar manner to Example 5 except that lutetium (III)
oxide in Example 5 was changed to oxides containing various metal elements indicated
in Comparative Examples 4 to 11 in Table 1 and the raw material powders were mixed
so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 1. An absorption ratio of the resulting phosphor,
an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external quantum efficiency thereof
were measured and calculated. Table 2 indicates the results.
[0066] The above results indicate the following. That is, when Example 5 containing lutetium
or Example 10 containing scandium is compared to Comparative Examples 4 to 11 containing
other metal elements, both the internal quantum efficiencies and the external quantum
efficiencies in Examples 5 and 10 are better than those in Comparative Examples 4
to 11. Therefore, it is found that a phosphor containing lutetium or scandium has
a better internal quantum efficiency and a better external quantum efficiency than
phosphors containing other metal elements indicated in Comparative Examples 4 to 11
in Table 1.
[Table 1]
|
mixing ratio of raw materials |
SrCO3 |
BaCO3 |
Eu2O3 |
SiO2 |
MgO |
SrF2 |
SrBr2 |
Lu2O3 |
Sc2O3 |
Nd2O3 |
Sm2O3 |
Dy2O3 |
Ho2O3 |
Er2O3 |
Tm2O3 |
Yb2O3 |
Pr6O11 |
Comparative Example 1 |
0.995 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 2 |
0.991 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.0005 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Example 1 |
0.993 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.001 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Example 2 |
0.991 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.002 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Example 3 |
0.989 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.003 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Example 4 |
0.987 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.004 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Example 5 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.005 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Example 6 |
0.983 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.006 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Example 7 |
0.975 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Example 8 |
0.965 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.015 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Example 9 |
0.955 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 3 |
0.945 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Example 10 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
- |
0.005 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 4 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
0.005 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 5 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
0.005 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 6 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.005 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 7 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.005 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 8 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.005 |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 9 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.005 |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 10 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
001 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.005 |
- |
Comparative Example 11 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0175 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.0017 |
[Table 2]
|
composition |
absorption ratio |
internal |
external |
Comparative Example 1 |
Sr1.015Ba0.85Eu0.035SiO3.9▪0.3MgO |
81.5 |
80.5 |
65.6 |
Comparative Example 2 |
Sr1.014Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.001SiO3.9005▪0.3MgO |
81.0 |
80.4 |
65.1 |
Example 1 |
Sr1.013Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.002SiO3.901▪0.3MgO |
81.2 |
81.0 |
65.8 |
Example 2 |
Sr1.011Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.004SiO3.902▪0.3MgO |
81.7 |
81.2 |
66.3 |
Example 3 |
Sr1.009Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.006SiO3.903▪0.3MgO |
82.8 |
80.7 |
66.8 |
Example 4 |
Sr1.007Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.008SiO3.904▪0.3MgO |
83.0 |
81.0 |
67.3 |
Example 5 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.01SiO3.905▪0.3MgO |
82.3 |
81.7 |
67.2 |
Example 6 |
Sr1.003Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.012SiO3.905▪0.3MgO |
82.4 |
82.1 |
67.6 |
Example 7 |
Sr0.995Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.02SiO3.91▪0.3MgO |
82.7 |
82.7 |
68.5 |
Example 8 |
Sr0.985Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.03SiO3.915▪0.3MgO |
81.4 |
83.5 |
67.9 |
Example 9 |
Sr0.975Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.04SiO3.92▪0.3MgO |
81.2 |
81.7 |
66.3 |
Comparative Example 3 |
Sr0.965Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.05SiO3.925▪0.3MgO |
81.0 |
78.3 |
63.4 |
Example 10 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035Sc0.01SiO3.905▪0.3MgO |
83.1 |
79.8 |
66.3 |
Comparative Example 4 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035Nd0.01SiO3.905▪0.3MgO |
82.0 |
38.0 |
31.1 |
Comparative Example 5 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035Sm0.01SiO3.905▪0.3MgO |
80.3 |
24.0 |
19.3 |
Comparative Example 6 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035Dy0.01SiO3.905▪0.3MgO |
83.1 |
78.3 |
65.0 |
Comparative Example 7 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035Ho0.01SiO3.905▪0.3MgO |
81.1 |
72.3 |
58.6 |
Comparative Example 8 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035Er0.01SiO3.905▪0.3MgO |
83.0 |
69.2 |
57.5 |
Comparative Example 9 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035Tm0.01SiO3.905▪0.3MgO |
83.0 |
76.4 |
63.4 |
Comparative Example 10 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035Yb0.01SiO3.905▪0.3MgO |
82.6 |
70.5 |
58.3 |
Comparative Example 11 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.035Pr0.01SiO3.905▪0.3MgO |
84.3 |
62.8 |
52.9 |
5. Experimental Example 4: addition of Li
(Example 11: Sr1.011Ba0.85Eu0.035Lu0.004SiO3.902·0.3MgO)
[0067] A phosphor (Sr
1.005Ba
0.85Eu
0.025Lu
0.01Li
0.01SiO
3.9·0.3MgO) was obtained in a similar manner to Example 1 except that the raw material
powders in Example 1 were mixed so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 3 using a
lithium carbonate powder (purity: 99% by mass) as a lithium source. An absorption
ratio of the resulting phosphor, an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external
quantum efficiency thereof were measured and calculated. Table 4 indicates the results.
(Comparative Examples 12 to 16)
[0068] A phosphor was obtained in a similar manner to Example 11 except that lutetium (III)
oxide in Example 11 was changed to oxides containing various metal elements indicated
in Comparative Examples 12 to 16 in Table 3 and the raw material powders were mixed
so as to obtain a mixing ratio in Table 3. An absorption ratio of the resulting phosphor,
an internal quantum efficiency thereof, and an external quantum efficiency thereof
were measured and calculated. Table 4 indicates the results.
[Table 3]
|
mixing ratio of raw materials |
SrCO3 |
BaCO3 |
Eu2O3 |
SiO2 |
MgO |
SrF2 |
SrBr2 |
Lu2O3 |
Ce2O3 |
La2O3 |
W2O3 |
Gd2O3 |
Li2CO3 |
Example 11 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0125 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.005 |
|
|
|
|
0.005 |
Comparative Example 12 |
1.005 |
0.85 |
0.0125 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.005 |
Comparative Example 13 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0125 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
0.005 |
|
|
|
0.005 |
Comparative Example 14 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0125 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
|
0.005 |
|
|
0.005 |
Comparative Example 15 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0125 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.005 |
|
0.005 |
Comparative Example 16 |
0.985 |
0.85 |
0.0125 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
0.005 |
0.005 |
[Table 4]
|
composition |
absorption ratio |
internal |
external |
Example 11 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.025Lu0.01Li0.01SiO3.9·0.3MgO |
82.3 |
82.6 |
68.0 |
Comparative Example 12 |
Sr1.025Ba0.85Eu0.025Lu0.025SiO3.9·0.3MgO |
81.4 |
80.4 |
66.4 |
Comparative Example 13 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.025Ce0.01Li0.01SiO3.9·0.3MgO |
83.2 |
76.6 |
62.8 |
Comparative Example 14 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.025La0.01Li0.01SiO3.9·0.3MgO |
83.1 |
77.4 |
64.3 |
Comparative Example 16 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.025W0.01Li0.01SiO3.9·0.3MgO |
82.0 |
62.8 |
43.3 |
Comparative Example 16 |
Sr1.005Ba0.85Eu0.025Gd0.01Li0.01SiO3.9·0.3MgO |
82.7 |
77.6 |
64.1 |