TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The invention relates to the field of electron beam welding and can be used in electron
beam welding of structural materials with control and management of the power density
of the electron beam directly within the welding process.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] There is a known method of electron beam welding with control of the power density
of the electron beam in the metal interaction zone, in which the electron beam is
focused based on a waveform obtained by isolating and processing the alternating components
of the secondary current with intersecting frequency spectra (Inventor's Certificate
No. 1468700, B23K15/00, 1989).
[0003] The known method provides satisfactory precision of control in focusing the electron
beam, but its operating speed is low. This is due to the fact that the method's secondary
radiation characteristics are highly dependent on the focusing lens current, have
a dead zone, and have two values of focusing lens current that provide waveform characteristics
that are equal in magnitude. As a result, systems for operational control of the focusing
of the electron beam using the known method provide poor-quality scanning, which substantially
limits the operating speed of these systems and negatively affects the quality of
the welded joint.
[0004] The method closest to the claimed method in its technical essence and achievable
effect is a method of electron beam welding in which the power density of the electron
beam is modulated by superimposing an alternating voltage with a specific frequency
on the beam current and/or the focusing lens current of the electron gun. The focusing
of the electron beam is regulated by the alternating component of the secondary current
that has a frequency equal to that of the modulation of the beam's power density;
determination is made of the two maxima of a function of the focusing current, amplitude,
and/or unnormalized spectral density of the component of the secondary current with
a frequency equal to that of the modulation of the power density of the electron beam;
and the beam is focused using the minimum value of the amplitude and/or unnormalized
spectral density of this component, regulating the focusing lens current in the interval
between its values that correspond to the maxima of the amplitude and/or spectral
density of the component (RF Patent No.
2183153, B23K 15/00, 2002).
[0005] A shortcoming of the known method is that it provides satisfactory precision of control
in focusing the electron beam only when welding with a modulated beam, but operational
control while welding requires low-frequency exploratory scanning of the electron
beam's focus, which negatively affects the quality of the welded joint.
[0006] JP S55 100886 A, on which the preamble of claim 1 is based, describes a method in which voltage oscillations
are registered by the direct detection of a variable which is proportional to the
accelerating voltage. During oscillations of a focal spot location high frequency
beam jitters are employed which makes it possible to decrease the specific capacity
of the electron beam during the oscillation. This document is silent on the use of
electrodes for sensing the secondary current.
[0007] GB 2026732 A describes a method in which the measurement of high voltage oscillations is replaced
by the measurement of the secondary current bursts or the ripple on the current from
the high voltage supply. This document is silent on defining a focus. Specifically,
during the ripple of the focal spot location, similar to
JP S55 100886 A, the high frequency oscillation is introduced or the current is reduced. The focusing
mode is defined as an average level of current focus, characterizing time averaged
specific capacity.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] The problem solved by the invention consists of the provision of a method of electron
beam welding given increased precision of operational control in the focusing of the
electron beam when deep welding using an oscillating electron beam.
[0010] The technical result obtainable by the invention is an increase in the quality of
welded joints formed when deep welding using an oscillating electron beam. This object
is obtained by a method according to claim 1. Preferred embodiments are indicated
in the subclaims.
[0011] Specifically, the electron beam welding is performed with a sinusoidally or linearly
oscillating electron beam in the frequency range from 300 to 2,000 Hz; during the
welding process, the waveform of the secondary current in the plasma is measured;
the original waveform of the secondary current in the plasma is filtered and rectified;
the filtered-and-rectified or original waveform of the secondary current in the plasma
is processed using the synchronous integration method; the magnitude of the delay
function, which results from processing the secondary waveform using the synchronous
integration method, is measured relative to the waveform of the current in the deflection
coils; then the focusing current is controlled while holding the value of the delay
function mentioned above at a constant level which corresponds to a specified magnitude
of the power density of the electron beam.
[0012] The claimed method makes it possible with high precision to implement operational
control of the focusing of the electron beam with the use of additional exploratory
scanning of the focus, thanks to the use of an additional data parameter when implementing
a sequence of actions in accordance with the invention's claims. The high-frequency
oscillating electron beam applied at the same time further improves the quality of
the welded joint.
[0013] The advantages of the method which have been mentioned ensure high-quality deep welding
using an oscillating electron beam and make it possible with high precision to implement
operational control of the focusing of the electron beam without the use of additional
exploratory scanning of the focus.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0014] The invention is hereinafter illustrated with a description of the preferred embodiments,
with references to the accompanying drawings in which:
- Fig. 1
- depicts the structural layout of an apparatus designed to implement the claimed method;
- Fig. 2
- depicts a plot of the reference waveform g(t) for the realization of synchronous integration, which was generated from the waveform
in the deflection coils and which was rectangular oscillations with a low duty cycle;
- Fig. 3
- depicts function S(τ), which is the result of processing the secondary waveform using the synchronous
integration method and depends on the shift of the reference waveform (a) and on the
waveform in the deflection coils (b) according to the formula

where t0 is the sample time;
- Fig. 4
- depicts the experimentally-obtained dependence of the delay Δτ0 of the function S(τ) on the level of focus ΔIf of the electron beam, with additional experimental control points plotted;
- Fig. 5
- presents a chart of the results of performing electron beam welding of steel using
3 kW of power for 5 different levels of focus of the electron beam ΔIf;
- Fig. 6
- depicts the distribution of the spectral density Af as a function of frequency f in the oscillation spectrum of the waveform of the secondary current in the plasma
when welding an item made of 12X18H10T stainless steel.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0015] In Fig. 1, the structural layout of an apparatus designed to implement the claimed
method is presented. While welding an item 1, the electron beam is oscillated in the
apparatus for electron beam welding by injecting linear, saw-toothed, or sinusoidal
oscillations into the current of the deflection coils 2 by means of the block 3 for
controlling the currents of the deflection coils
Idefl. The oscillations are in the frequency range from 300 to 2,000 Hz. During the process
of welding, the secondary current and the current of the deflection coils 2 is regulated
in the circuit containing an electron collector 4, bias supply 5, and termination
resistor 6. The voltage from the termination resistor 6, which is proportional to
the magnitude of the original waveform of the secondary current in the plasma, is
filtered and rectified in processing unit 7. In this same unit 7, the filtered-and-rectified
or original waveform of the secondary current in the plasma is processed using the
synchronous integration method together with the waveforms of the currents of the
deflection coils
Idefl. The processing produces the function
S(
τ), which is the result of processing the secondary waveform using the synchronous
integration method, and the magnitude of the delay Δ
τ0 or Δ
S of the function
S(
τ) relative to the waveform of the current in the deflection coils (Fig. 4). The magnitude
of the delay Δ
τ0 or Δ
S of the function
S(
τ) relative to the waveform of the current in the deflection coils is a monotonic function
of the level of focus Δ
If of the electron beam (Fig. 5) and becomes zero when the electron beam is sharply
focused. The control unit 8 and the block 9 for controlling the current of the focusing
coils 10 regulate the current of the focus of the electron beam, while holding the
magnitude of the delay mentioned above, Δ
τ0 or Δ
S of the function
S(
τ), at a constant level which corresponds to a specified level of focus of the electron
beam relative to the surface of the item. In particular, holding the magnitude of
the delay equal to zero ensures maximum weld penetration and speed for a given power
level, which corresponds to the maximum power density in the weld zone. The function
S(
τ) and the magnitude of the delay Δ
τ0 or Δ
S of the function are displayed on a visualization device 11.
[0016] In accordance with the claimed method, it is preferable for the oscillation of the
electron beam to occur along the joint being welded. However, it should be noted that
oscillations across the joint may also be used with the X-shaped method and with the
application of other specially-shaped trajectories in order to further improve the
welding quality.
[0017] Experimental testing of the method was performed on specimens of 12X18H10T and 15X5M
steel on an electron beam welding apparatus with an inverting power supply with an
accelerating voltage of 60 kV and 6 kW of power. The electron beam was oscillated
by injecting periodic linear oscillations into the current of the deflection coils
Idefl. The distance from the face of the electron gun to the item was 100 mm. The experiment
was actively planned. There were four variables: welding power - P; scan size - 2A;
oscillation frequency of the electron beam - f; level of focus of the electron beam
-
ΔIf =
If - If0, the difference between the values of the focusing currents when welding,
If, and the sharp-focus current that maximizes penetration,
If0. The welding speed was 5 mm/s. The weld penetration without the oscillation of the
electron beam and the sharp focusing was 10-18 mm. The range of the variables for
each run is presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Variables |
ΔIf, mA |
f, Hz |
2 A, mm |
P, kW |
Lower bound of variability |
-14 |
50 |
0.4 |
2 |
Upper bound of variability |
14 |
1400 |
3.5 |
4 |
[0018] In accordance with the first embodiment of the invention, during welding passes the
current in the circuit of the secondary electron collector 4, which is located on
the face of the electron gun and has a +50V potential (Fig. 1), was recorded using
a computer-based data measurement system equipped with a multichannel analog-to-digital
interface. Waveforms proportional to the current in the deflection coils 2 were recorded
simultaneously. The results of the recording were written to a file for subsequent
processing. The sampling rate of the analog-to-digital conversion in the experiments
conducted was 400 kHz on two measuring channels. Some of the experiments were conducted
with a sampling rate of 2 MHz. Each of the melted specimens was subsequently processed
to prepare large cross-sections.
[0019] The waveform of the secondary current in the plasma from the electron collector installed
over the weld zone and the waveform of the current in the deflection coils were processed
using the computer-based data measurement system equipped with a multichannel analog-to-digital
interface.
[0020] The reference waveform
g(t) for the realization of synchronous integration according to the present invention
was generated from the waveform in the deflection coils and was rectangular oscillations
with a low duty cycle (Fig. 2).
Illustrated in Fig. 2:
[0021] Reference waveform
g(t): 1 - a trace of the deflecting current along the coil junction (
Osc(
t)); 2 - the generated reference waveform (
g(
t+τ),); 3 - the shift of the reference waveform relative to the waveform of the deflection
coils (τ).
[0022] The reference waveform
g(
t+τ), shifted by time
τ (0
<τ<T, where
T is the period of the waveform in the deflection coils), was multiplied by the waveform
of the secondary current
Data(
t) and then integrated (summed or averaged) over time t.
[0023] The result of these transformations was the function
S(
τ) (Fig. 3), which represents the change in the result of synchronous detection as
a function of the shift in the reference waveform.

where
t0 is the sampling time (which was 300 ms).
[0024] According to the models constructed for the magnitude of the delay Δ
τ0 of the function
S(
τ) relative to the waveform of the current in the deflection coils and for the weld
penetration as a function of the variables in Table 1, the correlation between the
model for the magnitude of the delay Δ
τ0 of the function
S(
τ) and the waveform of the current in the deflection coils is 0.957, which indicates
a direct relationship between the resultant functions and the parameters being observed.
[0025] In Fig. 4 the dependence of the magnitude of the delay Δ
τ0 on the level of focus Δ
If is presented, constructed based on the obtained regression equation. The points represent
additional experimental data obtained to verify a good fit for fixed values of all
of the variables in Table 1 besides Δ
If. The curve in Fig. 4 decreases monotonically as the level of focus increases, and
it becomes zero in the region of sharp focus which ensures maximum weld penetration.
Similar results were obtained for Δ
S (Fig. 3b), which also describes the magnitude of the delay Δ
τ0 of the function
S(
τ) relative to the waveform of the current in the deflection coils.
[0026] The method was tested on specimens of 15X5M steel in an electron beam welding apparatus
with a ELA-60/60 power supply with 3.6 kW of welding power.
[0027] Fig. 5 shows a chart of performing electron beam welding of steel with a 3-kW electron
beam for 5 different levels of focus of the electron beam
ΔIf (
ΔIf=
If - Ifo; the level of focus determined by the difference between the values of the focusing
current when welding and the sharp-focus current that maximizes weld penetration).
The magnitudes of the delay Δ
τ0 of the function
S(
τ) relative to the waveform of the current in the deflection coils are presented, having
been obtained in accordance with the claimed method. The sign and magnitude of the
delay Δ
τ0 of the function
S(
τ) depend on the level of focus
ΔIf, which decreases monotonically from positive values when under-focused to negative
values when using an over-focused electron beam (Fig. 4).
[0028] Fig. 5 also depicts cross-sections and geometric characteristics of the penetration
obtained when welding in each configuration. Clearly, the weld penetration h reached
its maximum value when the electron beam was focused, at which point the magnitudes
of the delay Δ
τ0 of the function
S(
τ) were observed to be 0, as confirmed by the chart in Fig. 5. The maximum ratio of
weld penetration h to joint width at the top d is observed at the same point.
[0029] Thus, the indicated data parameter makes it possible to identify when the electron
beam is focused when electron beam welding, without the application of additional
low-frequency exploratory scanning of the focus.
[0030] There were similar results when welding all of the materials used in the experiments,
in all of the configurations described above.
[0031] Fig. 6 depicts the Fourier transform of the waveform of the oscillations of the secondary
current in the plasma during electron beam welding of 12X18H10T steel. A distinct
peak in the spectral density can be seen at a frequency of approximately 17 kHz. The
frequency distributions for all of the investigated materials have a similar appearance
across the entire range analyzed. The frequency corresponding to the peak in the spectral
density depends on the material being welded and the welding configuration and lies
in the range from 5 kHz to 125 kHz (most commonly between 12-30 kHz). The peak in
the spectral density in the transform of the waveform of the secondary current in
the plasma reflects high-frequency processes in the "beam-channel-penetration-plasma"
system, which often most closely correlate to the magnitude of the power density when
welding.
[0032] The second claimed embodiment of the method is realized in the following manner.
[0033] The waveform of the secondary current in the plasma is filtered by isolating the
waveform of the alternating component, which includes the frequency range containing
the peak in the spectral density, from the transform of the oscillations of the secondary
current in the frequency range 5-125 kHz. Then the filtered waveform is rectified.
It is subsequently processed and the focusing current is regulated similarly to the
way it was in the first embodiment of the method.
[0034] The method was tested on specimens of 15X5M steel in an electron beam welding apparatus
with a ELA-60/60 power supply with 3.6 kW of welding power.
[0035] The waveform of the alternating component that includes the frequency range that
contains the peak in the spectral density was isolated from the transform of the oscillations
of the waveform of the secondary current in the plasma using a discrete bandpass filter.
For 12X18H10T steel, a range of 12.5-25 kHz was applied. Results similar to those
described below were obtained when narrower and broader ranges were chosen.
[0036] Then the filtered waveform is rectified and the resulting waveform is processed similarly
to the original waveform
Data(t) as in the first embodiment.
[0037] Fig. 5 shows the results of performing electron beam welding of steel with a 3-kW
electron beam for 5 different levels of focus of the electron beam
ΔIf (
ΔIf=
If - Ifo; the level of focus determined by the difference between the values of the focusing
current when welding and the sharp-focus current that maximizes weld penetration).
The magnitudes of the delay Δ
τ0 of the function
S(
τ) relative to the waveform of the current in the deflection coils is presented, having
been obtained by the method using the second embodiment. The sign and magnitude of
the delay Δ
τ0 of the function
S(
τ) depend on the level of focus
ΔIf, which decreases monotonically from positive values when under-focused to negative
values when using an over-focused electron beam. Moreover, the results obtained using
the second embodiment of the method are characterized by better linearity and make
it possible to more accurately identify when the beam is focused.
1. Verfahren zum Elektronenstrahlschweißen mit Funktionskontrolle der Leistungsdichte
und Fokuslevel des Elektronenstrahls, welches umfasst:
- Durchführen des Elektronenstrahlschweißens, wobei der Elektronenstrahl abgelenkt
wird durch Einspeisen von linearen, sägezahnartigen oder sinusförmigen Oszillationen
im Frequenzbereich von 300 bis 2000 Hz in einen Ablenkspulen (2) zum Ablenken des
Elektronenstrahls zugeführten Ablenkstrom; und ferner gekennzeichnet durch die folgenden Schritte:
- Messen, Filtern und Richten der Wellenform eines während des Schweißprozesses erzeugten
Sekundärstroms im Plasma;
- Verarbeiten der gefilterten-und-gerichteten oder originalen Wellenform des Sekundärstroms,
wobei eine synchrone Integrationsmethode verwendet wird, um eine Funktion S(τ) zu
erhalten, wobei die Funktion S(τ) erhalten wird durch die Formel

worin g(t+τ) eine Referenz-Wellenform ist, erzeugt aus der Wellenform des Ablenkstroms,
verschoben um die Zeit τ (0<τ <T, worin T die Periode des Ablenkstroms ist), Data(t)
die Wellenform des Sekundärstroms ist, t die Zeit ist und t0 eine Abtastzeit ist;
- Messen eines Werts einer Verzögerung der Funktion S(τ) relativ zu einer Wellenform
des Ablenkstroms, der den Ablenkspulen (2) zugeführt wird;
- Regulieren eines Fokussierstroms, der Fokussierspulen (10) zugeführt wird zum Fokussieren
des Elektronenstrahls, während der Wert der Verzögerung auf einem konstanten Level
gehalten wird, das einer spezifizierten Größe der Leistungsdichte des Elektronenstrahls
entspricht.
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei welchem der Wert der Verzögerung auf einem konstanten
Level gleich Null gehalten wird, was eine maximale Schweißpenetration und Geschwindigkeit
für ein gegebenes Leistungslevel sicherstellt, welches einer maximalen Leistungsdichte
in einer Schweißzone entspricht.
3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei welchem die Wellenform des Sekundärstroms gefiltert
wird durch Isolieren einer Wellenform einer alternierenden Komponente, welche einem
Frequenzbereich entspricht, der einen Peak in einer spektralen Dichte des Sekundärstroms
enthält, aus der Fourier-Transformation von Schwingungen des Sekundärstroms im Frequenzbereich
5-125 kHz, insbesondere im Frequenzbereich 12-30 kHz, und wobei die gefilterte Wellenform
gerichtet wird.
1. Méthode de soudage par faisceaux d'électrons avec un contrôle opérationnel de la densité
de puissance et du niveau de concentration du faisceau d'électrons, comprenant:
- réalisation de soudage par faisceau d'électrons, où le faisceau d'électrons est
dévié en injectant des oscillations linéaires, en dents de scie ou sinusoïdales, dans
la gamme de fréquences de 300 à 2 000 Hz, dans un courant de déviation fournie à des
bobines de déviation (2) pour dévier le faisceau d'électrons ; et caractérisée en outre par les étapes suivantes :
- mesure, filtration et rectification de la forme d'onde d'un courant secondaire dans
le plasma généré au cours du processus de soudure;
- traitement de la forme d'onde filtrée et redressée ou original du courant secondaire
en utilisant une méthode d'intégration synchrone pour obtenir une fonction S(τ), où
la fonction S(τ) est obtenue par la formule

où g(t+τ) est une forme d'onde de référence générée à partir de la forme d'onde du
courant de déviation décalée par le temps τ (0 < τ < T, où T est la période du courant
de déviation), Data (t) est la forme d'onde du courant secondaire, t est le temps
et t0 est un temps d'échantillon;
- mesure d'une valeur d'un retard de la fonction S(τ) par rapport à une forme d'onde
du courant de déviation fournie aux bobines de déviation(2) ;
- réglage d'un courant de concentration fournie à des bobines de concentration (10)
pour focaliser le faisceau d'électrons tout en maintenant la valeur du retard à un
niveau constant qui correspond à un niveau spécifié de la densité de puissance du
faisceau d'électrons.
2. La méthode de la revendication 1, où la valeur du retard est maintenue à un niveau
constant égal à zéro, assurant une pénétration et vitesse maximale de soudure pour
un niveau de puissance donnée, ce qui correspond à une densité de puissance maximale
dans une zone de soudure.
3. La méthode de la revendication 1, où la forme d'onde du courant secondaire est filtrée
en isolant une forme d'onde d'un composant en alternance qui correspond à une gamme
de fréquences contenant un pic dans une densité spectrale du courant secondaire à
partir de la transformée de Fourier d'oscillations du courant secondaire de la gamme
de fréquences de 5 à 125 kHz, en particulier dans la gamme de fréquences de 12 à 30
kHz, et dans laquelle la forme d'onde filtrée est rectifiée.