Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a magnesium alloy (hereinafter, referred to as a
Mg alloy) that exhibits superelastic effect and/or shape memory effect. In particular,
the present invention relates to a Mg alloy containing a certain amount of scandium
(Sc). The present application is an application related to Japanese Patent Application
No.
2015-201830, filed at Japanese Patent Office on October 13, 2015, and claims the priority based
on the foregoing Japanese Patent Application. In addition, the whole of the contents
of the following papers of the present inventors are cited:
Ando, D., et al., Materials Letters, Vol. 161, p. 5-8;
Ogawa, Y., et al., Science, 2016, Vol. 353(6297), pp. 368-370;
Ogawa, Y., et al., Scripta Materialia, doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.09.024.
Background Art
[0002] Mg alloys are the lowest in density and the lightest in weight among the metals used
for structural materials. Accordingly, when Mg alloys are used as the structural materials
for automobiles, aircraft and the like, the Mg alloys contribute to weight saving
and energy saving effect can be expected. Mg alloys are also excellent in recyclability,
and have an advantage that Mg alloys can be more easily recycled as compared with
plastics. Moreover, Mg alloys are high in specific strength, the resources for Mg
alloys are abundant, and thus, a few tens of years have passed since Mg alloys began
to be referred to as next-generation structural materials and attract attention. However,
widely used Mg alloys have never been developed. As one of the reasons why Mg alloys
have not yet been sufficiently practically used although there have been developed
Mg alloys light in weight, high in specific rigidity and excellent in shock absorption,
insufficient mechanical properties such as poor cold workability, or low strength
may be mentioned.
[0003] Alloys have been developed in which Al is added to Mg in order to increase the strength,
but suffer from the drawback that cold workability is poor. For example, examples
of typical Mg alloys containing Al as added therein include AZ31 (Al: 3% by mass,
Zn: 1% by mass, the balance: Mg), AZ61 (Al: 6% by mass, Zn: 1% by mass, the balance:
Mg), AZ91 (Al 9% by mass, Zn 1% by mass, the balance: Mg), AM (Al 6% by mass, Mn:
less than 1% by mass, the balance: Mg). Among these, only AZ31 allows rolled materials
highly versatile as structural materials to be easily obtained; however, even rolled
materials of AZ31 allow press working only at approximately 250°C, and find difficulty
in press working at room temperature. The drawback of being poor in cold workability
inhibits the practical use in various applications.
[0004] As a cause for poor cold workability and poor strength of common magnesium alloys,
the HCP (hexagonal close-packed) structure of the main phase is quoted; it has been
pointed out that premature fracture occurs because a local large deformation is caused
in the interior of the double twins formed during deformation. As the solutions for
such problems, there have been attempted controls of crystals such as crystal grain
refinement or crystal grain randomization (Non Patent Literature 1, 2). However, even
when the crystal microstructure control such as the crystal grain refinement is applied,
the crystal structure remains as HCP, and the improvement of the ductility is limited
because of the presence of the anisotropy due to the structure.
[0005] As a technique for improving the cold workability of Mg alloys, a Mg-Li alloy may
be mentioned (Patent Literature 1, Patent Literature 2, Non Patent Literature 3).
When Li is added to Mg in a content of 24.5 at%, the crystal structure is changed
from the HCP structure to the BCC (body-centered cubic) structure, and consequently
the cold workability is improved. However, with the increase of the lithium content,
the corrosion resistance is degraded. In addition, Mg-Li alloys are low in hardness
and strength, and poor in thermal stability. Therefore, Mg-Li alloys cannot be used
as materials requiring strength, such as materials for automobiles or aircraft. In
addition, Mg-Li alloys are poor in corrosion resistance, and accordingly require surface
treatment, and hence the applications of Mg-Li alloys are extremely limited.
[0006] In addition, as a second cause for no wide use of Mg alloys, there may be mentioned
a fact that Mg alloys have no such functionality as the functionality of Ti alloys,
and thus the application range of Mg alloys is not widened. Ti alloys have high specific
strength, and are excellent in ductility, and in particular, Ti alloys having BCC
structure are known to exhibit superelastic effect (Patent Literature 3). It is also
known that fundamentally, materials exhibiting superelastic effect due to the martensite
transformation caused by loading stress exhibit shape memory effect depending on the
transformation temperature in the state free from loading of stress. By utilizing
these properties, Ti alloys are increasingly applied to accessories such as frames
of spectacles, and to medical fields involving stents, catheters and guide wires.
[0007] The superelastic effect means a property getting back to the original shape immediately
after the removal of stress even when a large deformation strain is applied. The shape
memory effect means a property of an object getting back to the original memorized
shape when the temperature is equal to or higher than a certain temperature even when
the object is deformed by an external force. As a shape memory alloy having superelastic
effect, there have been developed alloys having various metals as bases such as Ni-Ti,
Cu-Al-Ni, Cu-Zn, Cu-Zn-Al, Cu-Al-Mn, Ti-Nb-Al, and Ni-Al.
[0008] It has recently been disclosed that a Mg alloy mainly composed of Mg, containing
as an alloy element at least one element selected from Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr and the like,
and having a unidirectional crystal structure has a pseudoelasticity (Patent Literature
4). As a mechanism allowing a Mg alloy to have a pseudoelasticity, there has been
disclosed a mechanism in which the addition of Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr or the like suppresses
the bottom plane sliding of the hexagonal crystal of Mg, and promotes the generation
of twin crystals. Patent Literature 4 discloses, as an Example, a Mg alloy including
1.0 to 1.7 at% of Y as added therein; the pseudoelasticity in the case of including
other elements is not disclosed, but it is recognized that the content of the element
component to be added to the matrix phase is assumed to fall within a range of 1.0
to 6.0 at%. However, in the pseudoelasticity originating from the reversible change
of the twin crystals, a plenty of residual strain is found, and a nearly perfect shape
recovery as high as 90% or more cannot be expected. In addition, in order to achieve
a good shape recovery, it is necessary to prepare a single crystal, and thus, the
practical use of such a Mg alloy is limited.
[0009] The present inventors have made a study while focusing attention on the crystal structure
of Mg alloys. The present inventors have considered that Mg alloys are poor in cold
workability because of taking HCP structure high in anisotropy, and accordingly have
searched Mg alloys having BCC structure. From the analysis of the phase diagrams,
in addition to the Mg-Li alloy, the Mg-Sc alloy including Sc as added therein has
been anticipated to have a BCC structure at a high Mg concentration. The present inventors
have already produced Mg alloys including Sc as added therein, and have analyzed and
reported the possibility of the two-phase microstructure control, the relation with
mechanical properties, and moreover, the crystal orientation (Non Patent Literature
4 to Non Patent Literature 8). In particular, it has been shown that restriction to
the two phases, namely, the BCC phase and the HCP phase, allows the achievement of
high strength to be performed (Non Patent Literature 4). In addition, the present
inventors have found that an aging treatment at a temperature of 175°C to 400°C produces
fine HCP structure deposits in the BCC phase, and consequently the Mg alloy is hardened
(Non Patent Literature 5, 6).
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0010]
Patent Literature 1: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2011-58089
Patent Literature 2: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-40445
Patent Literature 3: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2004-124156
Patent Literature 4: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2015-63746
Non Patent Literature
[0011]
Non Patent Literature 1: Miura, H. et al., 2010, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, Vol. 20, p.1294-1298.
Non Patent Literature 2: Kim, W.J. et al., Acta Materialia, 2003, Vol.51, pp.3293-3307.
Non Patent Literature 3: Sanschagrin, A. et al., 1996, Mater. Sci. Eng.A, A220, pp.69-77.
Non Patent Literature 4: Ando, D. et al., Abstracts of 126th Spring Conference of Japan Institute of Light
Metals (2014), pp.147-148.
Non Patent Literature 5: Ogawa, Y. et al., Abstracts of 128th Spring Conference of Japan Institute of Light
Metals (2015), pp.47-48.
Non Patent Literature 6: Ando, D. et al., Materials Letters, 2015, Vol.161, pp.5-8, (available online 17 Jun 2015)
Non Patent Literature 7: Ogawa, Y., et al., Mater. Sci. Eng.A, 2016, A670, p.335-341.
Non Patent Literature 8: Ogawa, Y., et al., Scripta Materialia, doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.09.024
Non Patent Literature 9: Ogawa Y., et al., Science, 2016, Vol.353(6297), pp.368-370.
Non Patent Literature 10: Ogawa, Y. et al., Abstracts of Meeting of Japan Institute of Metals and Materials
CD (159th Autumn Annual Meeting of Institute of Metals and Materials), 2016, ISSN
1342-5730, 339
Non Patent Literature 11: Handbook of Advanced Magnesium Technology, edited by the Japan Magnesium Association,
published by Kallos Publishing Co. Ltd., 2000, Chapters 4 and 5, pp.71 to 129.
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0012] Analyses have been performed on the Mg-Sc alloys as described above; however, there
are still many unclear points with respect to the method for controlling the microstructures
of the Mg-Sc alloys, and details of the mechanical properties of the Mg-Sc alloys.
In addition, Mg alloys having superelasticity and shape memory property and being
excellent in cold workability have never been developed yet. An object of the present
invention is to provide a Mg alloy having superelastic effect and/or shape memory
effect, and being excellent in cold workability.
Solution to Problem
[0013] The present inventors made a diligent study, and consequently have discovered that
a Mg-Sc alloy having a BCC structure having a specific composition range exhibits
superelastic effect concomitantly with stress-induced transformation. Moreover, the
present inventors have discovered that the foregoing Mg-Sc alloy has shape memory
effect (Non Patent Literature 9 and Non Patent Literature 10). The present invention
relates to the following alloy in which a certain amount of Sc is added to Mg, and
a method for producing the same.
[0014]
- (1) A Mg alloy having a BCC phase, and having superelastic effect and/or shape memory
effect, wherein the alloy comprises Mg as a main component, the alloy contains Sc
in a range of more than 13 at% and 30 at% or less, and the balance is Mg and inevitable
impurities.
- (2) The Mg alloy having superelastic effect and/or shape memory effect according to
(1), containing in addition to the above-described composition, as an additive element(s),
at least one or more selected from the group consisting of Li, Al, Zn, Y, Ag, In,
Sn and Bi, in a total content of 0.001 or more and 9 at% or less in relation to the
amount of the whole alloy defined to be 100 at%.
- (3) The Mg alloy having superelastic effect and/or shape memory effect according to
(1) or (2), containing in addition to the above-described composition, as an additive
element(s), at least one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca, Mn, Zr
and Ce, in a total content of 0.01 or more and 2.0 at% or less, and the total content
of the additive element(s) is 9 at% or less, in relation to the amount of the whole
alloy defined to be 100 at%.
- (4) A method for producing a Mg alloy having superelastic effect and/or shape memory
effect, wherein
a solution treatment is performed at a temperature of 500°C or higher such that the
alloy comprises Mg as a main component and the alloy contains Sc in a range of more
than 13 at% and 30 at% or less, and the balance is Mg and inevitable impurities, and
the solution is subjected to a cooling treatment at a cooling rate faster than 1000°C/min.
- (5) The method for producing a Mg alloy according to (4), wherein the solution treatment
is performed such that in addition to the above-described composition, as an additive
element(s), at least one or more selected from the group consisting of Li, Al, Zn,
Y, Ag, In, Sn and Bi are contained in a total content of 0.001 or more and 9 at% or
less in relation to the amount of the whole alloy defined to be 100 at%.
- (6) The method for producing a Mg alloy according to (4) or (5), wherein the solution
treatment is performed such that in addition to the above-described composition, as
an additive element(s), at least one or more selected from the group consisting of
Ca, Mn, Zr, and Ce are contained in a total content of 0.01 or more and 2.0 at% or
less, and the total content of the additive element(s) is 9 at% or less, in relation
to the amount of the whole alloy defined to be 100 at%.
- (7) The method for producing a Mg alloy according to any one of (4) to (6), wherein
an aging treatment is performed in a temperature range from 100°C to 400°C.
- (8) A Mg alloy having superelastic effect and/or shape memory effect produced by the
production method according to any one of (4) to (7).
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0015] The Mg alloy of the present invention is excellent in cold workability, and also
exhibits a superelastic effect and a shape memory effect. Accordingly, applications
in various fields can be expected for the Mg alloy of the present invention. In particular,
Mg dissolves in living organisms, accordingly when Mg is used for medical materials
such as stents to be left in living organisms, such materials are not required to
be exenterated from patients, and therefore burdens to patients can be reduced in
an extremely useful manner.
[0016] In addition to the characteristics of Mg alloys that Mg alloys are light in weight
and high in specific strength, Mg alloys are excellent in cold workability, and therefore,
Mg alloys can be expected to be applied to various structural materials in the aerospace
field, the automobile field and the like.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0017]
[Figure 1] Figure 1 is a graph showing a stress-strain curve of the Mg alloy in Example
1.
[Figure 2A] Figure 2A is a stress-strain cycle test graph of the Mg alloy of Example
1.
[Figure 2B] Figure 2B is a graph showing the relation between εt and εSE obtained from the stress-strain curve of Figure 2A.
[Figure 3] Figure 3 is a chart showing the X-ray diffraction results after heat treatment
of Examples 1, 4, and 6, and Comparative Example 3.
[Figure 4] Figure 4 is a chart showing the results of an X-ray analysis of the Mg
alloy of Example 1 performed while a stress was being loaded on the Mg alloy.
[Figure 5] Figure 5 is charts showing the X-ray diffraction patterns of Mg alloys.
Figure 5A shows the results of a Mg alloy containing Sc in a content of 20.5 at%,
and Figure 5B shows the results of a Mg alloy containing Sc in a content of 19.2 at%.
[Figure 6] Figure 6 is a sequence of the photographs showing how the temperature change
recovered the shape of a plate-shaped Mg alloy sample.
[Figure 7] Figure 7 is a graph showing the relation between the yield stress σy and the ratio of the relative crystal grain size to the sample plate thickness, and
the relation between the superelastic recovery strain magnitude εSEi=3 and the ratio of the relative crystal grain size to the sample plate thickness.
Description of Embodiments
[0018] Hereinafter, the present invention is described by way of Examples, but the present
invention is not limited by following Examples at all. Specifically, the present invention
naturally includes, for example, other examples and embodiments within the scope of
the technical concept of the present invention.
[0019] First, the alloy composition of the present invention is described. The Mg alloy
of the present invention includes Sc within the range of more than 13 at% and 30 at%
or less. When the addition content of Sc is 13 at% or less, the BCC phase is not obtained,
and the superelastic effect and the shape memory effect cannot be obtained. When the
addition content of Sc is 30 at% or more, the alloy is poor in ductility and undergoes
grain boundary fracture.
[0020] The Mg alloy of the present invention may include, if necessary, at least one or
more additive elements selected from the group consisting of Li, Al, Zn, Y, Ag, In,
Sn and Bi, in a total content of 0.001 to 9 at% in relation to the amount of the whole
alloy defined to be 100 at%. The inclusion of these elements allows the further improvement
of the superelastic effect and the regulation of the mechanical strength to be expected.
When the content of the additive element(s) exceeds 9 at%, the alloy is embrittled,
and is hence liable to be poor in workability. When the content of the additive element(s)
is less than 0.001 at%, no effect can be expected. Herein, Li is an element stabilizing
the BCC structure, and is regarded as effective in the improvement of the workability.
Al, Zn, Y, Ag, In and Sn have an effect of improving the strength through solid-solution
hardening or precipitation hardening, and suppress the dislocation migration so as
to be regarded as effective in improving the superelastic effect.
[0021] Moreover, at least one or more elements selected from the group consisting of Ca,
Mn, Zr, and Ce, refining the crystal microstructure without impairing the superelastic
effect may also be added. These elements are known to be able to achieve high strength
and high ductility by refining the crystal grains, and accordingly a high strength
and a high ductility of the Mg alloy can be expected to be achieved (Non Patent Literature
11). These additive elements can be included in a content of 0.01 to 2 at% in relation
to the amount of the whole alloy defined to be 100 at%. When the content of the additive
element(s) exceeds 2 at%, embrittlement is liable to occur. When the content of the
additive element(s) is less than 0.01 at%, the effects of the high strength and the
high ductility cannot be expected.
[0022] Successively, the method for producing an alloy of the present invention is described.
When the Mg alloy of the present invention is produced, a predetermined amount of
each of the foregoing elements is added, and the resulting mixture is melted in an
inert gas atmosphere. For the melting, high frequency heating melting is preferable.
The molten alloy is turned into a molten ingot, and the ingot is subjected to hot
rolling and cold rolling to be processed into a predetermined shape.
[0023] Next, a solution treatment is performed in which the Mg alloy processed into a predetermined
shape is heated to a solution treatment temperature range, to transform the crystal
microstructure into the BCC phase, and then rapidly cooled. The solution treatment
is performed at a temperature of 500°C or higher. The solution treatment temperature
is varied depending on the composition of the sample; in general, with the increase
of the Sc content, the temperature can be decreased. In an alloy having a relatively
larger Sc content, a perfect solution treatment is possible at a temperature of approximately
500°C; however, in an alloy having a lower Sc content, the solution treatment is required
to be performed at a higher temperature. Because when a solution treatment is performed
at 550°C or higher, a perfect solution treatment is performed, the treatment temperature
is preferably 550°C or higher and 800°C or lower. At a temperature of 550°C or lower,
alloys lower in the Sc content sometimes undergo formation of a large amount of the
HCP phase to fail in obtaining the superelastic effect. On the other hand, at a temperature
of 800°C or higher, the material starts to melt. The retention time at the treatment
temperature may be 1 minute or more; however, when the retention time exceeds 24 hours,
the effect of oxidation cannot be ignored. Accordingly, the retention time at the
treatment temperature preferably falls within a range from 1 minute to 24 hours. By
rapidly cooling after heating to the solution treatment temperature range, it is possible
to produce the Mg-Sc alloy having the BCC phase. From the viewpoint of the superelasticity,
the cooling rate is preferably 1000°C/min or more.
[0024] By further performing an aging treatment, it is possible to increase the hardness
of the material. The achievement of a high hardness allows the superelasticity, in
particular the repeating properties, to be improved. The aging treatment temperature
is preferably 100°C or higher and 400°C or lower.
Examples
[0025] Next, the present invention is described in more detail by way of Examples and Comparative
Examples. According to the compositions shown in Table 1, Mg alloys were produced
by mixing Sc alone in Mg (Examples 1 to 6), and by further mixing Li, Al, Zn, Y, Ag,
In, Sn, and Bi (Examples 7 to 16).
[0026] Specifically, individual materials were weighed out so as to give the alloy compositions
of Examples 1 to 16 in Table 1 presented below, and were melted in an argon atmosphere,
by using a high frequency melting furnace. Alumina crucibles were used as crucibles,
and after melting, the molten materials were retained in the crucibles to produce
molten ingots. Next, each of the ingots was hot rolled at a temperature of 600°C to
a thickness of approximately 2 mm, and then cold rolled to a thickness of approximately
0.7 mm at a temperature of 600°C, while annealing was being repeated. The obtained
sample was subjected to a solution treatment at a temperature of 500°C to 700°C for
30 minutes, and then rapidly cooled at a rate of 1000°C/min or more to prepare a Mg
alloy sample. The solution treatment temperature is verified by investigating the
temperature allowing the BCC phase to be obtained as a single phase by using an optical
microscope.
[0027] The alloys of Comparative Examples 1 to 4 were prepared as follows. The materials
were weighed out according to the compositions shown in Table 1, and were melted by
using a high frequency melting furnace in the same manner as in Examples. Next, in
each of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, the ingot was hot rolled to a thickness of approximately
2 mm at a temperature of 600°C, and then cold rolled to a thickness of approximately
0.7 mm at a temperature of 600°C, while annealing was being repeated. On the other
hand, in each of Comparative Examples 3 and 4, the ingot was hot rolled to a thickness
of approximately 2 mm at a temperature of 300°C, and cold rolled to a thickness of
approximately 0.7 mm at a temperature of 300°C while annealing was being repeated.
The obtained samples were heat treated at a temperature of 300°C for 30 minutes, and
then rapidly cooled at a rate of 1000°C/min or more to prepare Mg alloy samples. The
hot rolling temperatures and the subsequent heat treatment temperatures of the samples
are different from each other because the melting temperatures are different depending
on the compositions of the samples.
[0028] Next, specimens were prepared with the alloys, and measurements were performed to
determine whether or not the superelasticity was exhibited. Each of the specimens
was subjected to mechanical surface polishing so as to have a final thickness of 0.5
mm. The size of each of the specimens was set to be 3.5 mm in width, 0.5 mm in thickness,
and 10 mm in gauge length; a test was performed at a test temperature of -150°C, and
at a tensile rate of 0.5 mm/min. After loading a 4% pre-strain, the stress was unloaded,
and thus the superelastic shape recovery rate of the given strain was determined.
[0029] Here, the superelastic shape recovery rate was defined as the shape recovery magnitude
due to the superelasticity after the unloading of the load of the 4% tensile strain,
and was evaluated on the basis of the following formula:
[0030] As an example, the stress-strain curve obtained in the sample of Example 1 is shown
in Figure 1. When a stress is applied, first an elastic strain proportional to the
stress is generated. When the yield point (around 1% strain in Figure 1) is reached,
subsequently strain is generated without largely increasing the stress. As can be
seen from Figure 1, by unloading the stress after loading of the 4% pre-strain, the
sample of Example 1 manifested an excellent superelastic effect such that the given
strain was restored to a nearly original state.
[0031] It is to be noted that as shown in Figure 1, ε
t is "the pre-strain obtained by subtracting the recovery due to elastic distortion
from the tensile load strain (4%)," and ε
SE is "the superelastic recovery strain." By using alloys having various compositions,
the superelastic shape recovery rates were determined. The results thus obtained are
shown in Table 1.
[Table 1]
|
Mg |
Sc (at.%) |
Additive elements |
Superelastic shape recovery rate (%) |
Example 1 |
Balance |
20.5 |
- |
90 |
Example 2 |
" |
19.5 |
- |
77 |
Example 3 |
" |
14.5 |
- |
75 |
Example 4 |
" |
22 |
- |
90 |
Example 5 |
" |
26.5 |
- |
93 |
Example 6 |
" |
29.5 |
- |
90 |
Example 7 |
" |
21 |
Li:5at.% |
92 |
Example 8 |
" |
20 |
Li:8.6at.% |
90 |
Example9 |
" |
20.5 |
Li:5at.%, Y:2at.% |
85 |
Example 10 |
" |
18 |
Li:5at.%, Al:2at.% |
88 |
Example 11 |
" |
20 |
Li:5at.%, Zn:2at.% |
85 |
Example 12 |
" |
18 |
Li:5at.%, Sn:2at.% |
80 |
Example 13 |
" |
20 |
Li:5at.%, Bi:2at.% |
80 |
Example 14 |
" |
20 |
Li:3at.%, Ag:3at.%, In:2at.% |
75 |
Example 15 |
" |
21 |
Ag:2at.%, Y:2at.% |
80 |
Example 16 |
" |
22 |
Li:3at.%, Al: 2at.%, Y:2at.% |
80 |
Comparative Example1 |
" |
10 |
Al:4at.% |
0 |
Comparative Example 2 |
" |
13 |
- |
0 |
Comparative Example 3 |
" |
- |
Al:2.7at.%, Zn:0.4at.% (AZ31) |
0 |
Comparative Example 4 |
" |
- |
Zn:2.1at.%,Zr:0.15at.% (ZK60) |
0 |
[0032] As shown in Table 1, in the case (Comparative Example 2) where 13 at% of Sc alone
was added to Mg, absolutely no superelasticity was exhibited. On the other hand, in
the case (Example 3) where 14.5 at% of Sc was added, a superelastic shape recovery
rate of 75% was exhibited. In the case where the content of Sc was less than 13 at%,
even when the composition included 14 at% of Sc and another element in combination
(Sc 10 at%-Al 4 at%, Comparative Example 1), absolutely no superelasticity was exhibited.
Consequently, it has been concluded that the addition of Sc in a content of more than
13 at% is required for the purpose of having a superelastic effect.
[0033] In addition, in the case where Sc is alone added to Mg, the addition of Sc in a content
of 20.5 at% or more allows the superelastic shape recovery rate of 90% or more to
be obtained (Example 1). Accordingly, it is preferable to prepare an alloy composition
including Sc as added therein in a content of 20.5 at% or more. When Example 5 in
which Sc was added in a content of 26.5 at% is compared with Example 6 in which Sc
was added in a content of 29.5 at%, it is found that Example 5 smaller in the Sc content
was higher in the superelastic shape recovery rate. In the case where Sc is added
alone, it is understood that a high superelastic shape recovery rate can be obtained
with a peak around the addition amount of Sc of 26.5 at%.
[0034] In the cases where, Li, Al, Zn, Y, Ag, In, Sn and Bi were further added as the additive
elements in addition to Sc, high superelastic shape recovery rates were exhibited
in the same manner (Examples 7 to 16). The superelastic shape recovery rate is varied
depending on the elements added in addition to Sc and the addition amounts of the
elements; however, the improvement of the superelasticity can be obtained as compared
with the case where Sc is added alone. For example, the addition amount of Sc in the
Mg alloy of Example 10 is as small as 18 at%, but the superelastic recovery rate is
88%. In contrast, the superelastic recovery rate of the alloy of Example 2 in which
Sc was added alone in a content of 19.5 at% is 77%, so as for the superelastic recovery
rate of the Mg alloy of Example 10 to be higher than this value.
[0035] In addition, although not shown herein, as described above, Li contributes to the
workability improvement, and Al, Zn, Y, Ag, In and Sn contribute to the strength improvement
through solid-solution hardening or precipitation hardening, and accordingly, the
addition of these additive elements allows the improvement of the mechanical properties
other than the improvement of the superelastic effect to be expected. Accordingly,
the addition of a plurality of additive elements allows the improvement of different
mechanical properties other than the superelastic effect to be expected.
[0036] Moreover, at least one or more additive elements selected from the group consisting
of Ca, Mn, Zr, and Ce may be added. The addition of Ca, Mn, Zr and Ce refines the
crystal microstructure, and accordingly allows the strength improvement and the workability
improvement to be expected.
[0037] The Mg alloy sample of Example 1 was subjected to a tensile cycle test, and the obtained
maximum superelastic strain magnitude was evaluated. The tensile cycle test gives
the results of the superelastic recovery strain magnitude (ε
SE) measured while the tensile load strain magnitude (ε
t) is being gradually increased. Figure 2A shows the stress-strain cycle test chart.
In Figure 2A, σ
y denotes the yield stress, ε
ti denotes the tensile load strain magnitude in the cycle i, ε
ei denotes the pure elastic recovery strain magnitude in the cycle i, ε
SEi denotes the superelastic recovery strain magnitude in the cycle i, and ε
ri denotes the residual strain magnitude in the cycle i. In the first cycle, the alloy
sample is loaded with a tensile force up to a strain magnitude of 1%, and then unloaded.
In the second cycle, the alloy sample is loaded with a tensile force up to a strain
magnitude of 2%, and then unloaded. While this operation was repeated to the eighth
cycle, the stress was measured. Figure 2B shows the relation between the tensile load
strain magnitude and the superelastic recovery strain magnitude, obtained from the
measurement results of the tensile cycle test, and the maximum pure elastic recovery
strain magnitude of the Mg alloy of Example 1 was 4.4%. In addition, although no results
are shown herein, the Mg alloys of other Examples also exhibited equivalent maximum
pure elastic recover strain magnitudes.
[0038] In addition, as shown in Table 1, no superelasticity was exhibited by the existing
Mg alloys (AZ31: Comparative Example 3, ZK60: Comparative Example 4) in which Sc was
not added at all. These existing Mg alloys have been shown to take the HCP structure,
and thus, it is suggested that the participation of the BCC structure is important
for exhibiting the superelasticity in the case of the Mg alloys.
[0039] The present inventors have already revealed that some Mg-Sc alloys are provided with
the BCC structure, and in addition, in order to elucidate the relation between the
Mg alloys exhibiting the superelasticity and the BCC structure, an crystal structure
analysis was performed on the basis of X-ray diffraction.
[0040] The specimens of the alloys of Examples 1, 4, 6, and Comparative Example 3 were prepared
by performing solution treatment by heat treatment and performing rapid cooling in
the same manner as described above. Each of the specimens was set to have a size of
10 mm × 20 mm × 0.7 mm, and the surface of the specimen was mirror-finished by physical
polishing. The prepared specimens were subjected to X-ray diffraction. An X-ray diffractometer,
Ultima, manufactured by Rigaku Corporation was used, the θ/2θ method was adopted and
Cu K-α was used as an X-ray source. The results thus obtained are shown in Figure
3. Herein, the ordinate is given in logarithmic scale.
[0041] In Examples 1, 4 and 6, the peaks (marked with ○ in the chart) indicating the BCC
phases are large in strength, showing that substantially the BCC phases are present
as single phases. It is to be noted that in Example 1, the peaks (marked with ● in
the chart) indicating the HCP phase were observed to some extent, but these were produced
during rapid cooling after heat treatment, and the fraction of the HCP phase was 10%
or less. On the other hand, in Comparative Example 3, strong peaks of the HCP phase
were observed, showing that the HCP phase is present as a single phase. From these
results, it has been shown that the presence of the BCC phase is important for exhibiting
the superelasticity.
[0042] In addition, when the sample of Example 1 was subjected to an X-ray diffraction at
-150°C while being loaded with a stress, it has been found that a phase having an
orthorhombic crystal structure is generated from the BCC structure. Figure 4 shows
the results of an X-ray diffraction of the sample of Example 1 performed at -150°C
while a stress was being loaded on the sample of Example 1.
[0043] In the sample of Example 1, in the state of being free from stress loading at -150°C,
the BCC phase is observed as the main phase in the same manner as in the results (measured
at room temperature in a state of being free from stress loading) of Example 1 of
Figure 3, and the HCP phase produced during cooling is observed to some extent. On
the other hand, as shown in Figure 4, in the state of being loaded with a stress at
-150°C, additionally phases being probably orthorhombic crystal structures are observed
(marked with arrows in the chart). The orthorhombic crystal products disappear after
unloading the stress. This means that the superelastic effect is obtained in the Mg-Sc
alloy having the BCC phase in connection with the stress-induced transformation, in
the same manner as in common shape memory alloys. In this way, in the Mg-Sc alloy,
an excellent superelastic shape recovery rate is obtained in connection with the reversible
transformation in association with the stress loading-unloading in the BCC phase.
[0044] Next, an analysis was performed on the correlation between the cooling rate after
the solution treatment and the exhibition of the superelastic property. The Mg alloy
(Mg alloy containing 20.5 at% of Sc) having the same composition as the composition
of Example 1 was subjected to the solution treatment, and then Mg alloys were produced
by varying the cooling rate so as to be 1000°C/sec, 1000°C/min, 100°C/min, and 20°C/min.
The produced Mg alloys were subjected to a tensile test to measure the superelastic
shape recovery rate. The produced Mg alloys were also subjected to X-ray diffraction
to analyze the phase structure. The results thus obtained are shown in Table 2.
[Table 2]
Cooling rate |
Superelastic shape recovery rate |
Phase structure |
1000°C/sec |
90% |
BCC (+HCP) |
1000°C/min |
70% |
BCC (+HCP) |
100°C/min |
0% |
HCP |
20°C/min |
0% |
HCP |
[0045] When the cooling was performed at 1000°C/sec and 1000°C/min, the superelastic recovery
rates of 70% or more were obtained, but when the cooling was performed at 100°C/min
and 20°C/min, no superelastic property was obtained. When a Mg alloy containing 20.5
at% of Sc was used, as the X-ray diffraction results shows, even a cooling at 1000°C/sec
or 1000°C/min allowed a small amount of HCP phase to be contained. Fundamentally,
the slower the cooling after the heat treatment, the more grows the HCP phase. With
growth of the HCP phase, the superelastic recovery rate is also decreasingly exhibited.
In the compositions of the Mg-Sc alloys, the superelastic shape recovery rates due
to the cooling temperature are different from each other; however, the cooling performed
at a rate faster than 1000°C/min allows any alloys shown in Examples to exhibit superelasticity.
[0046] From the above-described results, in order to for the Mg alloy to have the superelastic
property, it has been shown to be very important that Sc is contained in a range from
more than 13 at% to 30 at% or less, and the cooling rate after the solution treatment
allows the BCC phase to be taken as the crystal structure.
[0047] Next, an analysis was performed as to whether or not these Mg alloys undergo martensitic
transformation under stress-free conditions. The samples of the Mg alloy (containing
Sc in a content of 20.5 at%) of Example 1 and an alloy containing Sc in a content
of 19.2 at% were subjected to an X-ray diffraction at 20°C and -190°C (Figure 5).
[0048] Figure 5A shows the X-ray diffraction patters at 20°C and -190°C, of a Mg alloy having
the BCC phase, and containing Sc in a content of 20.5 at%. The results obtained as
follows are shown: first, an X-ray diffraction was performed at 20°C, and then the
sample was cooled to -190°C and subjected to an X-ray diffraction. The Mg alloy sample
containing Sc in a content of 20.5 at% did not show any change between 20°C to -190°C,
and it is shown that martensitic transformation did not occur at this temperature.
[0049] The Mg alloy sample containing Sc in a content of 19.2 at% underwent a temperature
change from 20°C to - 190°C, and back to 20°C, and was subjected to X-ray diffraction
at the respective temperatures (Figure 5B). In this composition, the cooling to -190°C
caused a martensitic transformation from a body-centered cubic structure to an orthorhombic
structure (orthorhombic martensite phase, denoted as ortho-M in the chart). The martensite
phase is reversibly changed into the BCC phase by again increasing the temperature
to 20°C. Because the Mg alloy having this composition undergoes temperature-dependent
martensitic transformation between 20°C and-190°C, the shape memory property was suggested
to be exhibited.
[0050] Accordingly, an analysis was performed as to whether or not the shape memory property
of a Mg alloy containing Sc was exhibited. A plate-shaped sample of a Mg alloy containing
Sc in a content of 18.3 at% was deformed so as to have a surface distortion of approximately
5% at the liquid nitrogen temperature, and then the shape was observed when the temperature
was slowly increased while the sample temperature was being monitored (Figure 6).
It has been verified that the sample having this composition undergoes the start of
the shape recovery from around -30°C. This result shows that the smaller the Sc content,
the higher the martensitic transformation temperature.
[0051] Next, an analysis of the shape memory property of the Mg alloy containing Sc in a
content of 16.2 at%, Zn in a content of 1.0 at%, and Zr in a content of 0.1 at%. A
sample having the aforementioned composition was analyzed with respect to the martensitic
transformation start temperature (Ms), and the finish temperature (Mf), and the martensitic
reverse transformation start temperature (As), and the finish temperature (Af), by
using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Consequently, it was found that Ms=5°C,
Mf=-30°C, As=20°C, and Af=50°C.
[0052] Moreover, by using a sample having this composition, the shape memory property was
analyzed. A plate-shaped sample having this composition was bend-deformed so as to
have a surface distortion of approximately 3% at the liquid nitrogen temperature,
and then heated to 50°C or higher, and thus recovered to a nearly straight shape.
The shape recovery rate was found to be 95% or more, so as to be in good agreement
with the above result obtained by using DSC. This result shows that when Sc is contained
in a certain content, even a sample containing elements other than Sc has the shape
memory property. In addition, this alloy composition allows the shape recovery at
room temperature or higher to be achieved, and allows the alloy having this alloy
composition to be used at an environmental temperature in the vicinity of room temperature.
By regulating the composition in the manner as in present Example, an alloy that exhibits
the shape memory effect at an environmental temperature in the vicinity of room temperature
is obtained, and thus, the application range of such an alloy can be widened.
[0053] Next, the Mg alloy containing Sc in a content of 20.5 at% was investigated with respect
to the yield stress σ
y, the pure elastic recovery strain magnitude, and the relation of the relative crystal
grain diameter to the plate thickness of the sample (crystal grain diameter d/sample
plate thickness t). A stress-strain cycle test as shown in Figure 2 was performed,
and the yield stress and the superelastic strain magnitude (ε
SEi=3) obtained by applying a 3% strain and then unloading the strain were respectively
plotted against the plate thickness of the sample (Figure 7).
[0054] It has been shown that the yield stress is decreased with the increase of the relative
crystal grain diameter in relation to the plate thickness of the sample, and on the
other hand, the superelastic property is improved. This is the same tendency as the
characteristics seen in other shape memory alloys. Figure 5 shows the XRD results
down to -190°C; however, in the case of the Mg alloy having the composition of a Sc
content of 20.5 at%, no martensitic transformation thermally occurs in the temperature
range of absolute zero degree or higher. However, even a Mg alloy having a composition
free from the thermal occurrence of the martensitic transformation in the temperature
range of absolute zero degree or higher shows the same characteristics as the characteristics
shown by other shape memory alloys, as shown in Figure 7, and therefore, such a Mg
alloy has a possibility of recovering the shape depending on the conditions.
Industrial Applicability
[0055] The Mg alloy of the present invention is excellent in cold workability, and also
exhibits superelastic property and shape memory property. The Mg alloy of the present
invention having superelastic property and shape memory property, can be utilized
in the aerospace field, the automobile field and the like, because of the feature
of being "light" in weight. In addition, because Mg has biodegradability, when the
Mg alloy having superelastic effect is used in medical tools such as stents, such
medical tools are expected to be dissolved after being left in living bodies for certain
periods, and thus the Mg alloy provides significant benefits to patients.
1. A Mg alloy having a BCC phase, and having superelastic effect and/or shape memory
effect,
wherein the alloy comprises Mg as a main component, the alloy contains Sc in a range
of more than 13 at% and 30 at% or less, and
the balance is Mg and inevitable impurities.
2. The Mg alloy having superelastic effect and/or shape memory effect according to claim
1, containing in addition to the above-described composition, as an additive element(s),
at least one or more selected from the group consisting of Li, Al, Zn, Y, Ag, In,
Sn and Bi, in a total content of 0.001 or more and 9 at% or less in relation to the
amount of the whole alloy defined to be 100 at%.
3. The Mg alloy having superelastic effect and/or shape memory effect according to claim
1 or 2, containing in addition to the above-described composition, as an additive
element(s), at least one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca, Mn, Zr
and Ce,
in a total content of 0.01 or more and 2.0 at% or less, and the total content of the
additive element(s) is 9 at% or less, in relation to the amount of the whole alloy
defined to be 100 at%.
4. A method for producing a Mg alloy having superelastic effect and/or shape memory effect,
wherein
a solution treatment is performed at a temperature of 500°C or higher such that
the alloy comprises Mg as a main component and
the alloy contains Sc in a range of more than 13 at% and 30 at% or less, and the balance
is Mg and inevitable impurities, and
the solution is subjected to a cooling treatment at a cooling rate faster than 1000°C/min.
5. The method for producing a Mg alloy according to claim 4, wherein the solution treatment
is performed such that
in addition to the above-described composition, as an additive element(s), at least
one or more selected from the group consisting of Li, Al, Zn, Y, Ag, In, Sn and Bi
are contained
in a total content of 0.001 or more and 9 at% or less in relation to the amount of
the whole alloy defined to be 100 at%.
6. The method for producing a Mg alloy according to claim 4 or 5, wherein the solution
treatment is performed such that
in addition to the above-described composition, as an additive element(s), at least
one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca, Mn, Zr, and Ce are contained
in a total content of 0.01 or more and 2.0 at% or less, and the total content of the
additive element(s) is 9 at% or less, in relation to the amount of the whole alloy
defined to be 100 at%.
7. The method for producing a Mg alloy according to any one of claims 4 to 6, wherein
an aging treatment is performed in a temperature range from 100°C to 400°C.
8. A Mg alloy having superelastic effect and/or shape memory effect produced by the production
method according to any one of claims 4 to 7.