Field of the invention
[0001] The invention relates to dishwash compositions.
Background of the invention
[0002] Aqueous dishwash liquids are fast gaining popularity in D&E markets. Usually the
pH of such products is neutral to slightly acidic. However, such acidic/neutral compositions
are considered mild, especially against greasy soil.
[0003] One of the ways to enhance grease-cutting is to increase pH of the compositions by
including an alkali like sodium carbonate. It is believed that inclusion of an alkali,
in particular, sodium carbonate, helps in two ways. First, it results in a significantly
higher pH by its buffering action which in turn helps remove fatty soil by breaking
it down into more soluble species. Second, it serves as a builder and thereby makes
more surfactant available for cleaning. However, inclusion of high amount of an alkali,
in particular, sodium carbonate, often destabilises such compositions because they
turn hazy or turbid. Adverse effects of the alkali are less prominent at lower amounts
e.g., about 2 to 4 wt% but they become more prominent as its amount increases. It
is believed that instability is, at least in part, due to phase separation of surfactants
from the surrounding medium and the presence of other common additives which lead
to crystallization of sodium carbonate.
[0004] Nevertheless, there is demand for alkaline compositions and formulation scientists
want to make products, which contain more and more alkali so as to capitalize on its
grease cutting property. This demand cannot be fulfilled without overcoming few formulation
challenges. Aqueous liquid dishwash compositions need to be homogeneous and clear,
i.e. non-turbid.
[0005] One of the common methods to make liquid compositions more stable, homogeneous, and
clear is to incorporate hydrotropes to solubilise some of the ingredients in the compositions.
Commonly used hydrotropes include urea, ethyl alcohol, and toluene-, cumene- and xylene
sulphonates. However, while such hydrotropes may produce desired effects, often the
amount required to produce a perceivable and non-transient effect is too high. Inclusion
of higher amounts of hydrotrope(s) lead to technical problems in to escalation of
raw material costs.
[0006] GB1577140 A (Unilever, 1980) discloses the use of a combination of hydrotropes in an aqueous detergent composition
which is homogenous. The composition contains a surfactant, sodium tripolyphosphate
and sodium orthophosphate. The first hydrotrope is from the group consisting of toluene/xylene/cumene
sulphonates, urea, lower aliphatic alcohols and mixtures thereof. The second hydrotrope
is a fatty acid alkylolamide, a calcium soap of C
10-C
22-fatty acids or calcium soap of dimerised C
10-C
22 fatty acids.
[0007] US4126572 A (Unilever, 1978) discloses built liquid detergent compositions containing a different pair of hydrotropes.
The first hydrotrope is of the sulphonate-type and the second is a monoalkane phosphonic
acid or salt thereof. This combination provides improved stability, clarity and homogeneity.
[0008] EP1107673 A2 (P&G, 2001) discloses laundry powders containing non-alkoxylated anionic surfactant and about
30 % by weight sodium carbonate. The compositions, especially, example 3 formulations
II and VI, also contain sulphonate-type hydrotrope.
[0009] EP0896998 A1 (P&G, 1999) also discloses laundry powders containing non-alkoxylated anionic surfactant and
weight sodium carbonate. The compositions contain sulphonate-type hydrotrope.
[0010] There is a lot of non-patent and patent literature, which discloses the use of combination
of hydrotropes in cleansing compositions. However, the present inventors could not
find a practical solution to the problem described earlier and at least some of the
reported combinations failed to provide a useful solution.
There is an unmet need for clear and non-turbid. aqueous cleansing compositions which
contains non-alkoxylated anionic surfactant and significant amount of alkali metal
carbonate.
Summary of the invention
[0011] It has been determined that this problem can be solved by the composition in accordance
with claim 1.
[0012] Disclosed is an aqueous cleansing composition comprising:
- (i) 5 wt% to 30 wt% of a non-alkoxylated anionic surfactant;
- (ii) 5 wt% to 15 wt% alkali metal carbonate;
- (iii) a first hydrotrope in the range of 1 to 8 wt%; and,
- (iv) a second hydrotrope in the range of 1 to 8 wt%;
wherein said first hydrotrope belongs to the class of sulphonates and said second
hydrotrope belongs to the class of alcohols and the ratio between the amount of first
hydrotrope to that of said second hydrotrope is in the range of 1:1 to 3:1 parts by
weight and wherein said composition comprises 2 wt% to 15 wt% alkoxylated anionic
surfactant.
[0013] The invention is described in details in the following paragraphs.
Detailed description of the invention
[0014] The term "dishes" as used herein means any utensils involved in food preparation
or consumption which may be required to be washed to free them from food particles
and other food residues, greases, proteins, starches, gums, dyes, oils and burnt organic
residues.
[0015] While compositions in accordance with the invention are meant for cleaning dishes,
they may, alternatively, be used to clean any equivalent inanimate surface, in particular
any hard surface.
[0016] By hard surface is meant any kind of surface typically found in and around home or
office houses like kitchens, bathrooms, e. g. floors, walls, tiles, windows, cupboards,
sinks, showers, shower plasticized curtains, wash basins, WCs, fixtures and fittings
and the like made of different materials like ceramic, vinyl, no-wax vinyl, linoleum,
melamine, glass, Inox, Formica®, vitroceramic, plasticised wood, metal or any painted
or varnished or sealed surface and the like. Home or office hard surfaces also include
household appliances including, but not limited to refrigerators, freezers, washing
machines, automatic dryers, ovens, microwave ovens, dishwashers and so on. Such hard
surfaces may be found both in private households as well as in commercial, institutional
and industrial environments. Home or office hard surfaces include dish surfaces.
Non-alkoxvlated anionic surfactant
[0017] Compositions in accordance with the invention comprise 5 wt% to 30 wt% of a non-alkoxylated
anionic surfactant. More than 30 wt% of this surfactant could present formulation
challenges while at the same time could also make the composition too expensive.
[0018] The surfactant assists in removing soil and grease from soiled utensils and also
assists in maintaining the soil in solution or suspension in the wash liquor.
[0019] The term "non-alkoxylated" is used to distinguish the surfactants from their alkoxylated
counterparts which are described in details.
[0020] Suitable anionic surfactants are water-soluble salts of organic sulphuric acid monoesters
and sulphonic acids which have in the molecular structure a branched or straight chain
alkyl group containing from 6 to 22 carbon atoms in the alkyl part. Preferred anionic
surfactants are water soluble salts of (primary) long chain (e.g. 6-22 C-atoms) alcohol
sulphates (hereinafter referred to as PAS), especially those obtained by sulphating
the fatty alcohols produced by reducing the glycerides of tallow or coconut oil; alkyl
benzene sulphonates, such as those in which the alkyl group contains from 6 to 20
carbon atoms; secondary alkane sulphonates; and mixtures thereof.
[0021] Other preferred anionic surfactants are the olefinsulphonates (AOS) and alkyl sulphates,
and the fatty acid mono-glyceride sulphates. The particularly preferred non-alkoxylated
anionic surfactants are alkylbenzene sulphonates containing from 6 to 22 carbon atoms
in the alkyl group in a straight or branched chain, particular example of which is
sodium salt of alkylbenzenesulphonate. Generally the counter ion for anionic surfactants
is an alkali metal, typically sodium, although instead of alkali metals, other amine
based counter ions may also be present.
Alkali metal carbonate
[0022] The compositions according to the invention comprise 5 to 15 wt% of alkali metal
carbonate. Preferably the alkali metal carbonate is at least one of sodium carbonate
or potassium carbonate. It is preferred that the alkali metal carbonate is sodium
carbonate. Preferably, the amount of sodium carbonate is 8 to 12 wt%.
[0023] The carbonate, in particular sodium carbonate provides high pH and high reserve alkalinity
useful for degreasing.
Hydrotropes
[0024] Hydrotropes are useful solubilizing agents. l hHdrotropes enable the cloud point
of the compositions to be raised without additional anionic surfactants. Hydrotropes
are ingredients which provide solubility, viscosity, clarity and stability, but it
is believed that they have very little active role in performance of the composition
because they are not surfactants. Examples of hydrotropes include lower aliphatic
alcohols, especially ethanol; urea; lower alkylbenzene sulphonates such as sodium
toluene and xylene sulphonates; and combinations thereof.
[0025] Hydrotropes are expensive and they add to the raw material cost without any significant
role in cleaning, therefore it is desirable to use as little hydrotrope as possible.
However, the choice of suitable hydrotropes is linked to the type of the surfactants
and the builder(s). This is also dependent on other factors and properties like temperature
and storage stability. For example, stability is acceptable when the product is stored
at room temperature but less satisfactory results are achieved when the product is
stored under fluctuating conditions, or at lower temperatures.
[0026] The first hydrotrope belongs to the class of "sulphonates", i.e., sulphonate-type
hydrotrope. It is preferred that the first hydrotrope is at least one of sodium cumene
sulphonate, sodium xylene sulphonate, sodium toluene sulphonate, naphthalenesulphonate,
methylnaphthalenesulphonate, dimethylnaphthalenesulphonate or trimethylnaphthalenesulphonate.
Known equivalents include the potassium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts..
[0027] The second hydrotrope belongs to the class of alcohols. It is preferred that the
second hydrotrope is at least one of ethylene glycol, monopropylene glycol, dipropylene
glycol or glycerol. In comparison with the sulphonate-type hydrotropes alone, which
would otherwise be used, the combination enables significant reduction in the total
amount of hydrotrope, while simultaneously improving the overall hydrotrope effect.
[0028] Although the first hydrotrope belongs to the class of sulphonates,such hydrotropes
have practically nil surface activity. Therefore the first hydrotrope has no contribution
towards the amount of the non-alkoxylated anionic surfactant.
[0029] The amount of the first hydrotrope is in the range of 1 to 8 wt%.
[0030] The second hydrotrope is in the range of 1 to 8 wt%.
[0031] Preferably the amount of the first hydrotrope is in the range of 2 to 8 wt%.
[0032] Preferably the amount of the second hydrotrope is in the range of 2 to 8 wt%.
Alkoxvlated anionic surfactant
[0033] The compositions in accordance with this invention include an alkoxylated anionic
surfactant. Use of such a surfactant, especially when the individual amount of the
first and second hydrotropes is at the lower end of the ranges disclosed above, provides
clear and stable compositions at even lower hydrotrope content.
[0034] Therefore compositions in accordance with this invention comprise 2 wt% to 15 wt%
alkoxylated anionic surfactant. A preferred alkoxylated anionic surfactant is an ethoxylated
anionic surfactant like sodium lauryl ether sulphate (SLES) having varying degrees
of alkoxylation, which may range from 0.5 to 7 or even more.
Water:
[0035] The cleansing compositions in accordance with the invention are aqueous. It is preferred
that the compositions comprise 30 wt% to 94 wt% water. The amount of water will vary
depending on the total amount of other essential and preferred ingredients.
Other preferred ingredients:
Other surfactants
[0036] The aqueous cleansing compositions of the invention may further comprise other type
of surfactants for better cleansing. Such surfactants could be selected from amphoteric,
zwitterionic and nonionic surfactants.
[0037] In addition to the presence of alkoxylated anionic surfactant and the non-alkoxylated
anionic surfactant, additional surfactant may be present in the formulation. Additional
surfactants may be chosen from, for example, other anionic and/or nonionic detergent
actives. It is preferred that the compositions in accordance with this invention comprise
up to 1 % by weight non-ionic surfactant. In addition, It is preferred that the compositions
in accordance with this invention comprise up to 1 % by weight cationic surfactants,
up to 1 % by weight amphoteric surfactants and up to 1 % by weight zwitterionic surfactants.
[0038] Nonionic surfactants tend to reduce the foam produced on use of the composition.
Consumers tend to associate more foam with powerful cleaning, so it is desirable to
either avoid the use of nonionic surfactants altogether, or to use up to 1 % by weight.
For compositions which do include a nonionic surfactant, suitable nonionic surfactants
may be broadly described as compounds produced by the condensation of simple alkylene
oxides, which are hydrophilic in nature, with an aliphatic or alkyl-aromatic hydrophobic
compound having a reactive hydrogen atom. The length of the hydrophilic or polyoxyalkylene
chain which is attached to any particular hydrophobic group may be readily adjusted
to yield a compound having the desired balance between hydrophilic and hydrophobic
elements. This enables the selection of nonionic surfactants with the right 'HLB'
value. The HLB value is a measure of the hydrophilic/lipophilic balance of such a
surfactant.
[0039] Particular examples of preferred nonionic surfactants include: the condensation products
of aliphatic alcohols having from 8 to 22 carbon atoms in either straight or branched
chain configuration with ethylene oxide, such as a coconut alcohol/ethylene oxide
condensates having from 2 to 15 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of coconut alcohol;
condensates of alkylphenols having C
6-C
15 alkyl groups with 5 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alkylphenol; and condensates
of the reaction product of ethylene-diamine and propylene oxide with ethylene oxide,
the condensates containing from 40 to 80 % by weight of ethyleneoxy groups and having
a molecular weight of from 5,000 to 11,000 Daltons.
[0040] Other classes of nonionic surfactants include for example: tertiary amine oxides
of structure R
1R
2R
3N-O, where R
1 is an alkyl group of 8 to 20 carbon atoms and R
2 and R
3 are each alkyl or hydroxyalkyl groups of 1 to 3 carbon atoms, e.g. dimethyldodecylamine
oxide; tertiary phosphine oxides of structure R
1R
2R
3P-O, where R
1 is an alkyl group of 8 to 20 carbon atoms and R
2 and R
3 are each alkyl or hydroxyalkyl groups of 1 to 3 carbon atoms, for instance dimethyl-dodecylphosphine
oxide; dialkyl sulphoxides of structure R
1R
2S=O, where R
1 is an alkyl group of from 10 to 18 carbon atoms and R
2 is methyl or ethyl, for instance methyl-tetradecyl sulphoxide; fatty acid alkylolamides,
such as the ethanol amides; alkylene oxide condensates of fatty acid alkylolamides;
and alkyl mercaptans.
[0041] If one or more nonionic surfactants are used, the amount present in the compositions
of the invention will generally be at least 0.1 % by weight. Preferably the amount
of nonionic surfactant will be around 0.5 % by weight.
[0042] Suitable amphoteric surfactants include the derivatives of aliphatic secondary and
tertiary amines containing an alkyl group of 8 to 20 carbon atoms and an aliphatic
group substituted by an anionic water-solubilising group, for instance sodium 3-dodecylamino-propionate,
sodium 3-dodecylaminopropane-sulfonate and sodium N-2-hydroxy-dodecyl-N-methyltaurate.
[0043] Examples of suitable cationic surfactants may be selected from quaternary ammonium
salts having one or two alkyl or aralkyl groups of from 8 to 20 carbon atoms and two
or three small aliphatic (for example, methyl) groups, for instance cetyl trimethyl
ammonium chloride.
[0044] A specific group of surfactants is the tertiary amines obtained by condensation of
ethylene and/or propylene oxide with long chain aliphatic amines. The compounds behave
like nonionic surfactants in alkaline medium and like cationic surfactants in acid
medium.
[0045] Examples of suitable zwitterionic surfactants include derivatives of aliphatic quaternary
ammonium, sulfonium and phosphonium compounds having an aliphatic group of from 8
to 18 carbon atoms and an aliphatic group substituted by an anionic water-solubilising
group, for instance betaine and betaine derivatives such as alkyl betaine, in particular
C
12-C
16 alkyl betaine, 3-(N,N-dimethyl-N-hexadecylammonium)-propane 1-sulfonate betaine,
3-(dodecylmethyl-sulfonium)-propane 1-sulfonate betaine, 3-(cetylmethyl-phosphonium)-propane-1-sulfonate
betaine and N,N-dimethyl-N-dodecyl-glycine. Other well-known betaines are the alkylamidopropyl
betaines for example, those wherein the alkylamido group is derived from coconut oil
fatty acids.
[0046] Examples of such further surfactants suitable for inclusion herein can be found in
"
Surface Active Agents" Vol. 1 , by Schwartz & Perry, Interscience 1949,
Vol. 2 by Schwartz, Perry & Berch, Interscience 1958, in the current edition of "
McCutcheon's Emulsifiers and Detergents" published by Manufacturing Confectioners
Company or in "
Tenside-Taschenbuch", H. Stache, 2nd Edn., Carl Hauser Verlag, 1981.
Other Optional Ingredients
[0047] The aqueous cleansing compositions of the invention may optionally comprise other
ingredients, such as fragrance, colourant, foam boosting agent, preservatives (e.g.
bactericide), pH buffering agent, polyelectrolyte, anti-oxidant, anti-corrosion agent
and anti-static agent.
Viscosity. pH and other properties
[0048] It is preferred that the aqueous cleansing compositions according to the invention
have viscosity of 100 to 10,000 mPa.s, more preferably from 200 to 8000 mPa.s, even
more preferably from 400 to 6,500 mPa.s, and still even more preferably from 800 to
5,000 mPa.s, as measured at a shear rate of 20 s
-1 at 25 °C.
[0049] Viscosity may be determined by using a HAAKE® Viscotester VT550 (Gebruder HAAKE GmbH,
Karlsruhe, Germany), using an 18/8 stainless steel MV measuring cup and a MV2 bob.
Viscosity may be increased or decreased by adding any suitable known viscosity enhancing
or lowering agent.
[0050] It is preferred that pH of the aqueous cleansing compositions according to the invention
is in the range of 10 to 13. The compositions in accordance with this invention may
preferably comprise a buffering agent, able to maintain the pH of a formulation. Any
suitable buffering agent, or a buffer-system may be used, for example, a mixture of
sodium carbonate and sodium hydrogen carbonate.
Method and use:
[0051] Compositions according to the invention may be used for cleaning soiled dishes or
any similar hard surface. In general, a method for use would include a step of contacting
a soiled plate with an efficacious amount of the composition preferably with the help
of a scrubber or implement such as sponge, scouring pad or cloth, followed by scrubbing
and later by rinsing with water.
[0052] Alternatively, the compositions of the invention, or their diluted variants, may
be made available in the form of a pre-impregnated implement such as a sponge.
Packaging
[0053] The aqueous cleansing compositions according to the invention may be packaged in
any suitable container. It is preferred that the composition is packaged in a plastic
bottle with a detachable closure /pouring spout. The bottle may be rigid or deformable.
[0054] A deformable bottle allows the bottle to be squeezed to aid dispensing. If clear
bottles are used they may be formed from PET. Polyethylene or clarified polypropylene
may be used. Preferably the container is clear enough that the liquid, with any visual
cues therein, is visible from the outside. The bottle may be provided with one or
more labels, or with a shrink wrap sleeve which is desirably at least partially transparent,
for example 50% of the area of the sleeve is transparent. The adhesive used for any
transparent label should preferably not adversely affect the transparency.
[0055] The invention is further described with reference to the following non-limiting examples.
Examples
Example 1
[0056] Several compositions, some within and some outside the scope of the present invention
were prepared. Details are shown in Table 1. Also included is a remark on whether
the compositions were stable or not (turbid/clear). Stable compositions were clear
whereas turbid compositions were unstable. All compositions were tested at 25 °C.
Table 1
| Composition Ref. No. |
Ingredient/wt% |
| Na2CO3 |
Na-LAS |
SLES 1EO |
SXS |
MPG |
Water |
Visual Observation |
| 1 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| 2 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
-- |
-- |
10.0 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| 3 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
-- |
-- |
14.0 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
-- |
20.0 |
-- |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| 5 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
-- |
2.0 |
2.0 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| 6 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
q.s. |
Clear |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
10.0 |
15.0 |
5.0 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
q.s. |
Clear |
| 8 |
10.0 |
5.0 |
15.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
q.s. |
Clear |
| 9 |
10.0 |
-- |
20.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
q.s. |
Clear |
| 10 |
10.0 |
15.0 |
5.0 |
-- |
-- |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| 11 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
-- |
-- |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| 12 |
10.0 |
5.0 |
15.0 |
-- |
-- |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
10.0 |
35.0 |
-- |
6.0 |
6.0 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
-- |
6.0 |
6.0 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| 15 |
5.0 |
10.0 |
-- |
0.5 |
0.5 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
15.0 |
30.0 |
-- |
10.0 |
10.0 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| 17 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
-- |
6.5 |
1.5 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
-- |
3.0 |
5.0 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| 19 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
-- |
2.0 |
6.0 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
Note: Abbreviations/short form used on Table 1 mean the following:
(i) Na2CO3 is the alkali metal carbonate
(ii) Na-LAS stands for linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, sodium salt
(iii) SLES 1EO stands for sodium lauryl ether sulphate
(iv) SXS stands for sodium xylenesulphonate, which is the first hydrotrope.
(v) MPG is monopropylene glycol which is the second hydrotrope |
[0057] In addition to some other inferences, the following may be drawn from Table 1.
[0058] Data pertaining to composition 1 indicates that composition which contains more amount
of the non-alkoxylated anionic surfactant and the sodium carbonate, but which is devoid
of any hydrotrope, is turbid. It is believed to happen due to phase-separation of
the anionic surfactant and recrystallization of a significant portion of the alkali
metal carbonate.
[0059] Addition of as high as 10 wt% MPG does not render the composition clear (Composition
2). Even an increase in the amount of MPG does not help (Composition 3).
[0060] Further addition of more amount of hydrotrope makes the composition turbid again
(Composition 4). Therefore in order to get a clear composition at an appreciably high
amount of anionic surfactant, it is necessary to use more of the first hydrotrope.
[0061] On the other hand, using less than efficacious amount of hydrotropes, even in combination,
also does not provide a technical solution (MPG and SXS at 2 wt% each in Composition
5). When the total amount of the anionic surfactant is balanced with introduction
of the alkoxylated anionic surfactant, the composition becomes clear. (Compositions
6, 7, 8)
[0062] The data pertaining to composition 9 indicates that a composition devoid of non-alkoxylated
anionic surfactant is clear at very low hydrotrope content but such a composition
would not provide the desired extent of cleansing, especially that of oily stains
and such residues on soiled dishes. Such compositions would fall outside the scope
of the present invention.
[0063] Data pertaining to compositions 10 to 12 indicates that those totally devoid of hydrotrope
are turbid, regardless of any permutation or combination of surfactants.
[0064] Composition 13 is turbid because it contains too much non-alkoxylated anionic surfactant.
Composition 14 is turbid because it contains too much sodium carbonate. Composition
15 is turbid because the individual amount of the first and second hydrotropes is
less than minimum amount of each and the composition is devoid of alkoxylated anionic
surfactant. Composition 16 is turbid because it contains too much hydrotrope in combination
and it is devoid of the alkoxylated anionic surfactant. On the other hand, Compositions
17, 18 and 19 are turbid because the ratio of the amount of first hydrotrope to that
of said second hydrotrope is outside the range of 1:1 to 3:1 parts by weight and each
composition is devoid of the alkoxylated anionic surfactant.
Example 2: Compositions outside the invention [containing other hydrotropes]
[0065]
Table 2
| Composition Ref. No. |
lngredients/wt% |
Visual Observation |
| Na2CO3 |
Na-LAS |
Urea |
TEA |
Citric Acid |
Water |
| 20 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
-- |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| 21 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
-- |
4.0 |
4.0 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| 22 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
4.0 |
-- |
4.0 |
q.s. |
Turbid |
| Note: TEA is Triethylamine |
[0066] The data in table 2 clearly indicates that in spite of there being an appreciable
quantity of total hydrotrope in the compositions, none of the compositions is clear.
It happens because these hydrotropes do not belong to the classes in accordance with
the present invention.