[Technical Field]
[0001] The present invention relates to a high hardness wear-resistant steel with excellent
toughness and cutting crack resistance, and a method for manufacturing the same. The
present invention claims benefit of priority to Korean Patent Application No.
10-2015-0179009.
[Background Art]
[0002] In fields of the production of industrial equipment such as dump trucks for mines,
heavy construction equipment, construction equipment, and the like, there may be a
high demand for wear-resistant steels having a hardness of 450 or higher on the basis
of Brinell hardness.
[0003] Wear-resistant steels have to have a high surface hardness. High hardness martensitic
steels have high hardness as well as high yield strength and tensile strength to be
widely used for structural materials, transportation/construction machines, and the
like.
[0004] Generally, a steel composition contains a large amount of alloying elements and high
carbon to secure so-called quenchability, and a quenching operation in a manufacturing
process may be essentially included, to produce high hardness martensitic steels.
[0005] However, since conventional martensitic steels may contain large amounts of carbon
and alloying elements therein, the weldability and low-temperature toughness of such
steels may be adversely affected, and such steels may also have a poor resistance
to cracks generated in the cut portion when cutting steel to a desired size, i.e.
poor cutting crack resistance.
[0006] JP 2004-300474A discloses an abrasion-resistant steel comprising, by weight %, 0.05-0.40% C, 0.1-0.8%
Si, 0.5-2.0% Mn, 0.05% or less P, 0.02% or less S, 0.005-0.5% Ti, 0.0005-0.005% B,
one or more elements selected from among Cu, Ni, Pr, Mo, Nb and V and the remainder
Fe, and having a surface layer comprising substantially a martensitic structure in
a quenched state and a central part of sheet thickness comprising a tempered martensitic
structure, a tempered bainitic structure or a mixed martensite-bainitic structure.
[0007] KR 10-2014-0048481A discloses a method of forming an abrasion-resistant steel comprising steps of hot
rolling a reheated steel slot to produce a steel sheet; cooling the hot-rolled steel
sheet; further reheating and rapid cooling.
[Disclosure]
[Technical Problem]
[0008] An aspect of the present invention may provide a high hardness wear-resistant steel
having high toughness and cutting crack resistance while relatively reducing the addition
amount of alloying elements, such as carbon (C), or the like, which may adversely
affect toughness, or the like of the wear-resistant steel.
[0009] Another aspect of the present invention may provide a manufacturing method for efficiently
producing the above-mentioned high-hardness wear-resistant steel.
[Technical Solution]
[0010] According to an aspect of the present invention, a high hardness wear-resistant steel
has a composition containing, by weight ratio, 2.1 to 4.0% of manganese (Mn), 0.15
to 0.2% of carbon (C), 0. 02 to 0. 5% of silicon (Si), 0.2 to 0. 7% of chromium (Cr),
optionally one or more selected from the group of 0.1% or less of niobium (Nb), 0.02%
or less of boron (B), and 0.1% or less of titanium (Ti), a remainder of Fe and other
unavoidable impurities, has a microstructure in which a prior austenite grain size
is 25 µm or less and martensite is included as a main phase, and satisfies a condition
in which Ac3-Acl is 100°C or lower.
[0011] According to an aspect of the present invention, a method of manufacturing a high
hardness wear-resistant steel, includes: hot-rolling a slab having a composition containing,
by weight ratio, 2.1 to 4.0% of manganese (Mn), 0.15 to 0.2% of carbon (C), 0.02 to
0.5% of silicon (Si), 0.2 to 0.7% of chromium (Cr), optionally one or more selected
from the group of 0.1% or less of niobium (Nb), 0.02% or less of boron (B), and 0.1%
or less of titanium (Ti), a remainder of Fe and other unavoidable impurities, to provide
a steel plate, quenching the steel plate to a temperature of 200°C or lower at a cooling
rate of 3°C/sec or higher, reheating the quenched steel plate until the centre of
the steel plate reaches a temperature between Ac3 and 960°C, and secondarily quenching
the reheated steel plate to a temperature of 200°C or lower at a cooling rate of 3°C/sec
or higher, wherein a finishing temperature during the hot-rolling is Ar3 or higher,
and wherein an austenite grain size of the steel plate to be secondarily quenched
is 25 µm or less.
[Advantageous Effects]
[0012] According to an aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides steel
having high toughness and high cutting crack resistance while maintaining hardness
of the steel at a 450HB level, by increasing an amount of manganese (Mn) and conducting
ultra-refinement of grains, instead of optimizing an amount of carbon (C) in the steel.
[0013] Effects of the present invention are not limited to those described above, and additional
effects of the present invention will be fully understood from the following detailed
description.
[Description of Drawings]
[0014]
FIG. 1 is a view illustrating results of EBSD (Electron Back Scatter Diffraction)
analysis of a heat affected zone formed in gas cutting, and
Fig. 2 is microscopy images illustrating structures of Inventive Example 1, Comparative
Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 obtained from Example 1.
[Best Mode for Invention]
[0015] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail.
[0016] In the present invention, an amount of carbon (C) in steel is adjusted to be within
an appropriate range to ensure a low-temperature toughness of a wear-resistant steel,
and a large amount of manganese (Mn) is added to secure quenchability. Further, alloying
components are appropriately controlled to secure cutting crack resistance. Hereinafter,
a composition of the present invention will be described.
[0017] A wear-resistant steel according to the present invention may have a composition,
by weight ratio, containing 2.1 to 4.0% of manganese (Mn), 0.15 to 0. 2% of carbon
(C), 0.02 to 0.5% of silicon (Si), 0.2 to 0.7% of chromium (Cr), a remainder of iron
(Fe) and other unavoidable impurities. It should be noted that amounts of each component
in the present invention are expressed on the basis of weight unless otherwise specified.
Manganese (Mn) : 2.1 to 4.0%
[0018] Manganese (Mn) may be an element added to stabilize martensite and obtain high surface
hardness. In the present invention, manganese (Mn) is added in an amount of 2.1% or
more to obtain this effect. When an amount of manganese (Mn) is insufficient, ferrite
or bainite may be easily produced, and high hardness of a surface layer may thus be
difficult to obtain. When an amount of manganese (Mn) exceeds 4.0%, not only weldability
and cutting crack resistance may be remarkably reduced, but manufacturing costs of
the steel may also be significantly reduced. Therefore, in the present invention,
an amount of manganese (Mn) is added in the range of 2.1 to 4.0%.
Carbon (C) : 0.15 to 0.2%
[0019] Carbon (C) may be an element added to secure hardness of a surface layer in the steel,
similar to manganese (Mn). However, when an amount thereof is excessively high, there
may be a problem in which toughness and weldability are significantly lowered, such
that the amount is required to be controlled within an appropriate range. In the present
invention, 0.15% or more of carbon (C) is added to ensure sufficient hardness of a
surface layer. However, the upper limit of the amount is 0.20% since toughness and
weldability may be deteriorated when Mn is added in an excessively high amount.
Silicon (Si): 0.02-0.5%
[0020] Silicon (Si) may be an element added to serve as a deoxidizing agent, and may improve
strength by solid solution strengthening. In addition, since the amount is not reduced
to a very small amount at the time of production, a lower limit of an amount of Silicon
(Si) is e set to be 0.02%. When the amount is excessively high, toughness of a base
material as well as that of a welded portion may be significantly reduced, such that
the amount is limited to 0.5% or less.
Chromium (Cr): 0.2 to 0.7%
[0021] When chromium (Cr) is included in steel, it may serve a role in raising the hardenability
of the steel to facilitate securing martensite when quenching. Further, in the wear-resistant
steel of the present invention, as the amount thereof increases, impact toughness
at low temperature may be improved, and an interval between an Ac1 and an Ac3, phase
transformation temperatures, may be narrowed to improve cutting cracking resistance.
The amount thereof is 0.2% or more to obtain such an advantageous effect of chromium
(Cr) . When the amount is excessively high, there may be a risk of lowering the weldability
and raising the manufacturing cost, such that upper limit of the amount of chromium
(Cr) is set to be 0.7%.
[0022] In addition, the wear-resistant steel of the present invention may further contain
0.1% or less of niobium (Nb), 0.02% or less of boron (B), and 0.1% or less of titanium
(Ti), in addition to the above-described alloying elements.
Niobium (Nb): 0.1% or less
[0023] Niobium (Nb) may be an element increasing the strength of steel by effects of solid
solution strengthening, precipitation hardening, or the like, and improves impact
toughness by conducting grain refinement, and may be added as needed. When the amount
is excessively high, coarse precipitates may be formed to deteriorate hardness and
impact toughness, such that the amount thereof is limited to 1.0% or less.
Boron (B) : 0.02% or less
[0024] Boron (B) may be an element that effectively increases quenchability of a material
even with a small amount of addition, and has an effect of inhibiting grain boundary
fractures by strengthening grain boundaries, and may be added and used as needed.
When the amount thereof is excessively high, toughness and weldability may be significantly
lowered due to formation of coarse precipitates, or the like. Therefore, the amount
thereof is limited to 0.02% or less.
Titanium (Ti): 0.1% or less
[0025] Nitrogen (N) may be mentioned as an impurity element which may be inevitably included
in steel. When nitrogen (N) is combined with boron (B), there may be an adverse effect
of decreasing the effect of boron (B). Titanium (Ti) may be an element which is effective
in suppressing the decrease of the effect of boron (B) by nitrogen (N), and significantly
increasing the addition effect of boron (B) . For example, titanium (Ti) may react
with nitrogen (N) present in steel to form TiN, thereby suppressing formation of BN.
In addition, TiN may also have the effects of pinning austenite grains, and suppressing
coarsening of the grains. Therefore, in the present invention, titanium (Ti) may be
added in the steel as required. When the addition amount of titanium (Ti) may be excessively
high, coarse precipitates may be formed to lower toughness and weldability, such that
the amount thereof is limited to 0.1% or less.
[0026] One of remainder components of the present invention may be iron (Fe) . Since impurities,
which are not intended, may be inevitably incorporated from raw material or surrounding
environment in the conventional steel manufacturing process, the wear-resistant steel
of the present invention does not specifically exclude the impurities. The kinds and
amounts of these impurities are not particularly limited in the present invention,
since they may be known to any one of ordinary skill in the art.
[0027] The wear-resistant steel of the present invention has a value of Ac3-Ac1 of 100°C
or lower, in addition to the above-mentioned composition system, to improve cutting
crack resistance. According to the research results of the inventors of the present
invention, the cutting crack generated at the time of gas cutting may be a kind of
hydrogen induced crack, and may be characterized by the fact that it is more likely
to occur as residual stress generated in a heat affected zone (in particular, ICHAZ)
is relatively high. Therefore, reducing the residual stress of the heat affected zone
may be one means of improving crack resistance. In the present invention, it is proposed
to adjust the value of Ac3-Acl for this purpose. For example, an Ac3 is a temperature
at which pro-eutectoid ferrite begins to be generated in austenite during cooling,
and an Ac1 is a temperature at which a structure is entirely transformed into ferrite.
According to the results of research conducted by the present inventors, when controlling
the value of Ac3-Ac1, the residual stress of the ICHAZ (InterCritical Heat Affected
Zone) may be greatly reduced, and the occurrence of cracks in this zone may be reduced.
The reason for this is that a large value of Ac3-Ac1 means that the 2 phase temperature
region in which austenite and ferrite coexist may be relatively wide. As a result,
as the ICHAZ in which two phases of austenite and martensite are present is wider,
the stress may largely remain inside, due to the volume change difference between
the two phases. FIG. 1 shows the results of an EBSD (Electron Back Scatter Diffraction)
analysis of the heat affected zone formed during gas cutting. A Kernal average misorientation
map showing the heat affected zone of the welded portion is observed in an upper portion
of the figure, while a concentration region of the residual stress is observed in
a lower portion of the figure. As shown in the figure, the present inventors have
found that red color appears to be the most concentrated in ICHAZ, thus the present
inventors could understand that residual stress may be concentrated in the ICHAZ.
Therefore, when the value of Ac3-Ac1, which may be effective for reducing a size of
the ICHAZ, is controlled to be 100°C or lower, excellent cutting crack resistance
may be obtained.
[0028] Therefore, in the present invention, the value of Ac3-Ac1 is limited to 100°C or
lower.
[0029] Further, the wear-resistant steel according to the present invention has an internal
structure in which prior austenite grain size in a surface is 25 µm or less and a
martensite phase is included as a main phase. In the present invention, the term 'main
phase' means a phase having the highest occupancy rate in terms of an area fraction.
According to one aspect, the wear-resistant steel of the present invention may contain
95% or more of a martensite phase in an area fraction. That is, the martensite phase
having a fine particle size has an effect of improving low-temperature toughness.
The fraction of martensite may be preferably 95% or more to achieve high hardness
and excellent wear resistance. In the present invention, the prior austenite grain
size may be obtained by observing a structure eroded with the picric acid etchant
under an optical microscope (for example, having a magnification of 200 times), and
using the value calculated according to the provisions of JIS G0551.
[0030] Particularly, the wear-resistant steel of the present invention may have fine grain
and thus have excellent toughness . Therefore, there may be no need for an additional
tempering operation to secure toughness to be desired. Therefore, in the martensite
phase of the wear-resistant steel of the present invention, there may be substantially
no carbide-based precipitate present. Thus, it should be noted that the phrase, for
example, there may be no carbide-based precipitate present, means that the martensite
phase substantially does not include carbide-based precipitates in the present invention.
[0031] In one aspect of the present invention, the thickness of the steel plate may be in
the range of 80 mm or less to secure core hardness up to 400HB. The thinner the thickness,
the easier it may be to cool. Therefore, the hardness may be easy to be secured, such
that a lower limit of the thickness may be not specially defined. According to one
aspect of the present invention, however, thickness of the wear-resistant steel may
be set to be 3 mm or more, considering that the wear-resistant steel may be produced
by hot-rolling.
[0032] The wear-resistant steel of the present invention satisfying such conditions may
have a value of 420 to 480 on the basis of Brinell hardness, and may have excellent
toughness with Charpy impact energy of 35 J or more at -40°C. Further, according to
another aspect of the present invention, the wear-resistant steel of the present invention,
for example, may have a cutting crack resistance that does not cause cutting crack,
even after a week or more in which, for example, a steel plate having a thickness
of 11 mm is cut by 400 mm or more under a condition of not preheating at the time
of gas cutting and a cutting speed of 500 mm/min. Particularly, the wear-resistant
steel of the present invention may not only have high wear resistance without substantially
adding alloying elements such as Mo, Ni, or the like, added to increase wear resistance
in wear-resistant steel, but also excellent toughness and cutting crack resistance.
[0033] A method for producing the wear-resistant steel of the present invention is as follows.
In the method of manufacturing a wear-resistant steel of the present invention, after
a steel material may be hot-rolled, quenching is performed to obtain a martensite
phase, followed by heating to an austenite temperature range, and then quenching.
Each process will be described in more detail as follows.
Hot-rolling process
[0034] Hot-rolling process may be carried out by a conventional method. However, hot-rolling
finishing temperature may be set in the range of an Ar3 to 900°C on the surface portion
basis to be suitable for the subsequent quenching process. That is, when hot-rolling
is performed at a temperature lower than an Ar3, ferrite may be excessively formed
in steel, which may result in a problem in which an intended structure may not be
obtained in a subsequent quenching process, such that the hot-rolling end temperature
is an Ar3 or higher. In one aspect of the present invention, the hot-rolling end temperature
may be set to be 800°C or higher. Further, when the hot-rolling finishing temperature
is excessively high, grain size of austenite before quenching may be relatively large,
and packet size of the obtained martensite phase may not be sufficiently refined.
Therefore, the hot-rolling end temperature may be set to 900°C or lower.
Direct quenching immediately after hot-rolling
[0035] In the present invention, the steel is immediately quenched immediately after hot-rolling.
In this case, 'immediately' means that the surface temperature of the steel may start
to be quenched without falling below the austenite formation temperature. When quenching
is performed immediately after the hot-rolling, as in the present invention, martensite
transformation occurs in a state in which grains are refined by hot-rolling, such
that the obtained martensite phase may be refined. Quenching immediately after hot-rolling
of the present invention is performed by quenching at a cooling rate of 3°C/sec or
higher until the center temperature of the steel becomes 200°C or lower (according
to one aspect, to a temperature selected from ambient temperature to 200°C) . It may
be not necessary to set the upper limit of the cooling rate, because the faster the
cooling rate, the better. However, the cooling rate may be set to be within the range
of 50°C/sec or less in consideration of the conventional quenching process. The steel
hot-rolled by the above-mentioned process may be transformed from austenite to a martensite
phase.
Reheating
[0036] The hot-rolled and quenched steel is then be subjected to a reheating process. When
the steel including the martensite phase is heated to be within an austenite temperature
range, since the inner packet boundary of the already formed martensite phase functions
as a nucleation site of the austenite phase, austenite nucleation occurs in many locations.
The resulting austenite grains may be very refined in size.
[0037] For this purpose, it is necessary to heat the quenched steel to a temperature equal
to or higher than an Ac3 with respect to the center. When the heating temperature
is relatively high, the austenite grain size may increase again, such that upper limit
of the heating temperature is set to be 960°C.
[0038] According to an aspect of the present invention, it may be preferable that the heat
treatment time (also referred to as a soaking time) after the center of the steel
plate reaches the Ac3 temperature may be maintained at 120 minutes or less. Considering
a sufficient heat treatment effect, it may take 20 minutes or more. However, the time
may vary slightly depending on the thickness of the steel plate, and may be maintained
for a longer time, when the thickness of the steel plate is relatively high.
Secondary quenching
[0039] The austenitized steel according to the preceding process is cooled to a temperature
of 200°C or lower (a temperature between ambient temperature and 200°C, at a cooling
rate of 3°C/sec or higher at the center portion. Through the above process, the wear-resistant
steel of the present invention may be formed with a martensite phase having a fine
particle size in a proportion of 95% or more in area fraction. In one aspect of the
present invention, the austenite phase immediately before the secondary quenching
has a grain size of 25 µm or less. The fine packet size of the final martensite phase
may be obtained by making the austenite phase immediately before the secondary quenching
fine. In the present invention, the size of the austenite phase immediately before
the secondary quenching may be confirmed by measuring prior austenite grain size of
the finally obtained steel.
[0040] The upper limit of the cooling rate in the secondary quenching process may be not
particularly limited, but may be limited to 50°C/sec or less in one aspect of the
present invention.
[0041] According to the above-mentioned process, it may be possible to provide a wear-resistant
steel having a value of 420 to 480 on the basis of Brinell hardness and having excellent
toughness with Charpy impact energy of 35 J or higher at -40°C. Further, according
to another aspect of the present invention, the wear-resistant steel produced by the
manufacturing method of the present invention may have cutting crack resistance that
does not cause cutting crack, even after a week or more that, for example, a steel
plate having a thickness of 11.8 mm is cut by 400 mm or more under conditions of not
preheating at the time of gas cutting and a cutting speed of 500 mm/min.
[Mode for Invention]
[0042] Hereinafter, the present invention will be more specifically described by way of
examples. It should be noted that the following examples are intended to illustrate
and specify the present invention, and not to limit the scope of the present invention.
Since the scope of the present invention is determined by the scope of the claims
and matters able to be reasonably inferred therefrom.
Example 1
Inventive Example 1
[0043] A slab having a thickness of 70 mm, having a composition containing, by weight ratio,
0.19% of carbon (C), 2.6% of manganese (Mn), 0.2% of silicon (Si), 0.4% of chromium
(Cr), 0.04% of niobium (Nb), 0.01% of titanium (Ti), 0.002% of boron (B), and in which
Ac3-Ac1 is 91°C, was rolled at a finish rolling temperature of 800°C, higher than
the an Ar3 temperature, to obtain a steel plate having a thickness of 11.8 mm, followed
by quenching with high-pressure water to 200°C, to confirm the effect of the production
method of the present invention. At this time, the cooling rate was 20°C/sec, and
96% of martensite phase by an area ratio was formed on the steel plate.
[0044] Thereafter, the steel plate was reheated to a temperature of 910°C based on the center
portion, maintained at 60 minutes after the center reached Ac3, quenched to 200°C
at a cooling rate of 20°C to obtain a final product.
Comparative Example 1
[0045] Procedures including quenching after hot-rolling were the same as that of Inventive
Example 1, but additional reheating and secondary quenching were omitted, to obtain
a final product.
Comparative Example 2
[0046] A final product was obtained in the same manner as in a case of Inventive Example
1, except that the product was air-cooled to ambient temperature, without being quenched
after hot-rolling.
[0047] FIG. 2 shows the results of observing the structures of Inventive Example 1, Comparative
Example 1, and Comparative Example 2 with a microscope. FIG. 2A shows Inventive Example
1, FIG. 2B shows Comparative Example 1, and FIG. 2C shows Comparative Example 2. As
seen from the figure, at least 95% of martensite was formed in Inventive Example 1,
Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 (specifically, 96% of martensite was
formed in Inventive Example 1, and 100% of martensite was formed in Comparative Examples
1 and 2, on the basis of an area) . In a case of prior austenite grain size (grain
size of region divided by a solid line in the drawing), those of Inventive Example
1 was 20 µm, which is within the conditions of the present invention, while those
of Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 were 31 µm and 28 µm, respectively,
which deviated from the conditions specified in the present invention.
[0048] As a result, all of Inventive Example 1, Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example
2 showed sufficient hardness values of 460, 462, and 455, respectively, as Brinell
hardness. In addition, the cutting crack resistance was tested according to one aspect
of the present invention, all of which showed good results. However, in the case of
Inventive Example 1, Charpy impact energy at -40°C was 42 J, which indicates a high
low-temperature toughness, while Charpy impact energy at -40°C in Comparative Example
1 and Comparative Example 2 were only 20 J and 22 J, respectively, which do not satisfy
the toughness level required by the present invention. Thus, the effect of the manufacturing
method according to one aspect of the present invention may be confirmed.
Example 2
[0049] A slab having the composition shown in the following Table 1 was produced under the
same conditions as in Inventive Example 1 of Example 1 to obtain wear-resistant steel.
The analysis results of the wear resistance obtained are shown in Table 2. Comparative
Example 7 of Table 2 shows the results of analysis in a case in which a slab having
the same composition as that of Inventive Example 7 was prepared in the same manner
as in Comparative Example 2 of Example 1. Particularly, cutting cracks in the steel
plate tended to occur, when a cutting speed was relatively high and a thickness was
relatively thick, under the condition of no preheating (without preheating) at the
time of gas cutting. This results from the fact that the residual stress formed in
the heat affected zone of the cut portion at the time of cutting is increased under
the above conditions. These cracks have characteristics of hydrogen delayed cracks
that occur after a period of about one week has elapsed. Therefore, to evaluate cutting
crack resistance, it was confirmed whether or not cutting cracks occurred even after
equal to or more than one week after cutting the steel plates by 400 mm or more at
a cutting speed of 500 mm/min. Further, a case in which a cracking crack occurred
was indicated as while a case in which a cracking crack did not occur was indicated
as 'O.' In addition, the impact toughness in Table 2 means Charpy impact energy measured
at -40°C.
[Table 1]
| Type of steel |
C (wt%) |
Mn (wt%) |
Si (wt%) |
Cr (wt%) |
Nb (wt%) |
Ti (wt%) |
B (wt%) |
| CE3 |
0.13 |
2 |
0.14 |
0.2 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.002 |
| IE2 |
0.18 |
2.2 |
0.15 |
0.2 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.002 |
| IE3 |
0.2 |
2.4 |
0.15 |
0.2 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.002 |
| IE4 |
0.19 |
2.6 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.002 |
| IE5 |
0.18 |
3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.002 |
| IE6 |
0.16 |
3.9 |
0.25 |
0.5 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.002 |
| IE7 |
0.18 |
2.2 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.002 |
| CE4 |
0.18 |
2.2 |
0.15 |
0 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.002 |
| CE5 |
0.24 |
2.2 |
0.15 |
0.3 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.002 |
| CE6 |
0.14 |
2.6 |
0.15 |
0.3 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.002 |
| * IE: Inventive Example, CE: Comparative Example |
[Table 2]
| Type of Steel |
Martensite Fraction (Area%) |
Austenite Grain Size(µm) |
Brinnel Hardnes S |
Impact Toughnes s |
Ac3-Ac1 (°C) |
Cutting Crack Resistance (Crack Not Generated) |
| CE3 |
92 |
20 |
410 |
36 |
95 |
0 |
| IE2 |
95 |
20 |
460 |
35 |
95 |
0 |
| IE3 |
95.4 |
22 |
478 |
38 |
85 |
0 |
| IE4 |
96 |
19 |
472 |
38 |
73 |
0 |
| IE5 |
100 |
20 |
461 |
42 |
90 |
0 |
| IE6 |
100 |
24 |
442 |
38 |
93 |
0 |
| IE7 |
100 |
18 |
457 |
45 |
93 |
0 |
| CE4 |
100 |
25 |
449 |
28 |
101 |
- |
| CE5 |
100 |
18 |
530 |
22 |
67 |
- |
| CE6 |
100 |
23 |
408 |
45 |
105 |
- |
| CE7 |
100 |
38 |
462 |
20 |
93 |
0 |
| * IE: Inventive Example, CE: Comparative Example |
[0050] For the analysis in Table 2, specimens of the appropriate shape for the test were
prepared. Optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used for
the microstructural analysis. Hardness of a surface layer portion was measured with
a Brinell hardness tester after grinding to a depth of about 2 mm from the surface.
[0051] First, from viewpoints of wear resistance and low-temperature toughness, Comparative
Example 3 in which amounts of carbon (C) and manganese (Mn) were lower than the values
specified in the present invention, was found to have Brinell hardness of 410 on the
surface layer portion which did not satisfy the level required in the present invention.
In addition, Comparative Example 4 was a case of not adding chromium (Cr) at all,
which is advantageous in securing toughness, and also narrows a gap between an Ac1
and an Ac3 to increase the cutting crack resistance. As a result, impact toughness
was found to be 67J which is very low. Comparative Example 5 was a case in which carbon
(C) was excessively added, the hardness was sufficient, but Charpy impact energy was
to be only 22 J, thus the low-temperature toughness was thus found to be very poor.
Comparative Example 6 was a case in which an amount of carbon (C) was only 0.14%,
and Brinell hardness was only 408, which did not satisfy the level required in the
present invention. In a case of Comparative Example 7, although the composition of
the steel satisfied the conditions of the present invention, but when the steel was
air-cooled after the hot-rolling, the prior austenite grain size was 38 µm, coarse
crystal grains were formed, and the low-temperature toughness was lowered.
[0052] From the viewpoint of cutting crack resistance, Comparative Example 4 and Comparative
Example 6 also failed to satisfy the condition of the present invention, since the
Ac3-Ac1 value thereof exceeded 100°C. As a result of the cutting crack resistance
test, results of cutting cracks were occurred after one week performing cut operation
under the given conditions. In a case of Comparative Example 5, cutting cracks occurred
despite the narrow temperature range of Ac3-Ac1, since Brinell hardness was excessively
high, such that the cutting conditions used in this measuring method were severe conditions
relative to hardness.
[0053] Therefore, it has been confirmed that, when the conditions of the steel specified
in the present invention are satisfied, low-temperature toughness and wear resistance
as well as cutting crack resistance will be satisfied in a combination.
[0054] While exemplary aspects have been shown and described above, it will be apparent
to those skilled in the art that modifications and variations could be made without
departing from the scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.