Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a granulated material that contains sludge and dust
which are generated in iron-making processes and that has improved conveyer transportability,
a method for manufacturing the granulated material, and a method for manufacturing
sintered ore using the granulated material.
Background Art
[0002] In various steel-making processes such as a pig iron-making process, a steelmaking
process, and a rolling process, large amounts of dust and sludge are generated. Since
such dust and sludge have high iron and carbon contents, it is preferable that such
dust and sludge be reused as iron sources and heat sources instead of being discarded
as waste. Generally, dust and sludge are used in high-temperature processes in a pig
iron-making process and a steelmaking process. Dust and sludge are re-melted in the
high-temperature processes and mixed into molten pig iron so as to be reused as iron
sources.
[0003] Since the dust is fine powder having a water content of 0 mass% to 5 mass%, dust
raising occurs when the dust is transported by a belt conveyer. On the other hand,
since the sludge has a high water content and high adhesiveness, the sludge adheres
to a conveyer junction and thereby causes clogging when the sludge is transported
by a belt conveyer. As just described, dust raising or clogging due to adhesion occurs
when the dust and the sludge are transported by a belt conveyer.
[0004] In response to such a problem, Patent Literature 1 discloses a method for manufacturing
a granulated material in which cake-shaped sludge generated in iron-making processes
is cracked, mixed with a fixation agent and dust generated in iron-making processes,
and subjected to a granulating treatment by using an apparatus for manufacturing a
granulated material which has a stirring impeller revolving in a drum and a stirring
rotor rotating while revolving along with the stirring impeller. It is disclosed that,
by using the method described above, it is possible to appropriately perform a granulating
treatment without performing a special drying treatment so that it is possible to
manufacture a granulated material which can preferably be used in high-temperature
processes.
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0005] PTL 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No.
2012-97295
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0006] Since the granulated material disclosed in Patent Literature 1 has a high water content,
a large amount of such granulated material adheres to a conveyer junction when such
a granulated material is transported by a belt conveyer. In particular, since a belt
conveyer is placed at an outdoor location at a steel plant, rain also falls on the
belt conveyer when it rains. Therefore, when it rains, since the granulated material
has a further increased water content, there is an increase in the amount of adhesion
to the conveyer junction, which results in a problem of clogging due to the granulated
material adhering in such a manner.
[0007] The present invention has been completed in view of the above-described problems
of the conventional techniques, and an object of the present invention is to provide
a granulated material with which it is possible to decrease the amount of adhesion
to a conveyer junction.
Solution to Problem
[0008] The present invention, which has been completed to solve the problems described above,
is characterized as follows.
- (1) A granulated material containing dust and sludge, in which a water content of
the granulated material is 10 mass% or more and 18 mass% or less, and a content of
a granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more is 90 mass% or more.
- (2) The granulated material according to item (1), in which a surface water content
of the granulated material is 10 mass% or more and 15 mass% or less.
- (3) A method for manufacturing a granulated material, the method including a dehydrating
process of dehydrating sludge to obtain a dehydrated cake and a granulating process
of making a granulated material by mixing and granulating the dehydrated cake and
dust by using a stirring apparatus, in which a water content of the granulated material
is 10 mass% or more and 18 mass% or less and a content of a granulated material having
a particle size of 0.125 mm or more is 90 mass% or more.
- (4) The method for manufacturing a granulated material according to item (3), in which
a surface water content of the granulated material is 10 mass% or more and 15 mass%
or less.
- (5) A method for manufacturing sintered ore, the method including a blending process
of blending at least the granulated material manufactured by using the method for
manufacturing a granulated material according to Claim 3 or Claim 4, an iron-containing
raw material, a CaO-containing raw material, and a binding material to obtain a sintering
raw material, a granulating process of granulating the sintering raw material by adding
water to the sintering raw material, and a sintering process of sintering the granulated
sintering raw material by using a sintering machine to obtain sintered ore.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0009] By using the granulated material according to the present invention, it is possible
to decrease the amount of adhesion of the granulated material to the conveyer junction
of a belt conveyer placed at an outdoor location, even when it rains. With this, it
is possible to inhibit clogging due to the granulated material from occurring when
belt conveyer transport is performed.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0010]
[Fig. 1] Fig. 1 is a perspective view of the inside of a stirring apparatus 10 used
for manufacturing the granulated material according to the present embodiment.
[Fig. 2] Fig. 2 is a plan view of the stirring apparatus 10.
[Fig. 3] Fig. 3 is a diagram illustrating a testing method used for checking a change
in the viscidity of a dehydrated cake which has been subjected to a shearing force
of a certain magnitude or more.
[Fig. 4] Fig. 4 is a side view of an adhesiveness testing apparatus 30.
Description of Embodiments
[0011] Hereafter, the present invention will be described in accordance with an embodiment
of the invention. The granulated material according to the present embodiment is a
granulated material containing sludge and dust which are generated in iron-making
processes. A water content of the granulated material is 10 mass% or more and 18 mass%
or less, and a content of a granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm
or more is 90 mass% or more. In the present embodiment, the water content of the granulated
material is calculated by dividing a difference in the mass of the granulated material
before and after the granulated material is dried by the mass of the granulated material
before the granulated material is dried, where drying is performed on the granulated
material at a temperature of 110°C for 12 hours. The content of a granulated material
having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more is calculated after the granulated material
has been dried by using a method similar to that described above by dividing the mass
of the granulated material remaining on a sieve having a sieve mesh of 0.125 mm by
the mass of the granulated material before sieving is performed.
[0012] By controlling the water content of the granulated material to be in the range of
10 mass% or more and 18 mass% or less and the content of a granulated material having
a particle size of 0.125 mm or more to be 90 mass% or more, there is a decrease in
the amount of adhesion to a conveyer junction, even when the granulated material is
transported by a belt conveyer placed at an outdoor location in the rain. As just
described, by using the granulated material according to the present embodiment, since
it is possible to decrease the amount of adhesion to a conveyer junction when it rains,
it is possible to inhibit clogging by the granulated material occurred due to the
above-described adhesion.
[0013] On the other hand, in the case where the water content of the granulated material
is less than 10 mass%, there is an increase in the amount of fine particles due to
granulating not progressing. Since fine particles are more likely than coarse particles
to cause adhesion, there is an increase in the amount of adhesion to a conveyer junction
due to the adhesion of such fine particles. In the case where the water content of
the granulated material is more than 18 mass%, since liquid bridge-formation forces,
which are caused by water, increase with an increase in the water content, there is
an increase in the amount of adhesion of the granulating raw material to a conveyer
junction regardless of the particle size. As just described, there is an upper limit
and a lower limit to the water content of the granulated material with which it is
possible to decrease the amount of adhesion to a conveyer junction. Moreover, also
in the case where the content of a granulate material having a particle size of 0.125
mm or more is less than 90 mass%, since there is an increase in the amount of adhesion
to a conveyer junction, it is not possible to inhibit clogging due to the granulated
material from occurring when belt conveyer transport is performed.
[0014] It is preferable that the surface water content of the granulated material be 10
mass% or more and 15 mass% or less. With this, there is a further decrease in the
amount of adhesion of the granulated material to a conveyer junction. The surface
water content of the granulated material is determined by using, for example, a near-infrared
moisture gauge, which is used for determining the water content of only the surface
of the granulated material. In the present embodiment, the water content of the surface
is evaluated in accordance with the calibration curve of a near-infrared absorption
spectrum method by using a near-infrared moisture gauge which has been calibrated
by using granulating raw materials having a water content of 0 mass% to 30 mass% prepared
by uniformly mixing sludge and dust. In the description hereafter, a material prepared
by mixing the dehydrated sludge cake with dust may be referred to as a "granulating
raw material".
[0015] Hereafter, the method for manufacturing the granulated material according to the
present embodiment will be described. First, a dehydrating process of dehydrating
sludge, which is generated in iron-making processes, by using a compression-type dehydrating
apparatus to obtain a dehydrated cake is performed. Next, a granulating process of
making a granulated material by mixing and granulating the dehydrated cake and dust,
which is generated in iron-making processes, by using a stirring apparatus is performed.
In such a manner, the granulated material according to the present invention is manufactured.
Examples of a compression-type dehydrating apparatus include a filter press and a
vacuum filter.
[0016] The sludge used in the present embodiment is sludge which is generated in steel-making
processes such as a pig iron-making process, a steelmaking process, a rolling process,
a coating process, and a pickling process and fine powder having a water content of
20 mass% or more.
[0017] The dust used in the present embodiment is dust which is generated in steel-making
processes such as a pig iron-making process, sintering ore-making process, and a steelmaking
process and fine powder having a water content of 0 mass% to 5 mass%.
[0018] Fig. 1 is a perspective view of the inside of a stirring apparatus 10 used for manufacturing
the granulated material according to the present embodiment. Fig. 2 is a plan view
of the stirring apparatus 10. The stirring apparatus 10 is an apparatus with which
a dehydrated cake, which has been obtained by dehydrating sludge, is finely cracked
and with which the finely cracked dehydrated cake and dust are mixed and granulated
to make a granulated material.
[0019] The stirring apparatus 10 has a cylindrical container 12, into which the dehydrated
cake and the dust are charged, a stirring impeller 14, and a weir 16. Although it
is preferable that the weir 16 be installed to scratch off the granulating raw material,
the weir need not be installed. The cylindrical container 12 has a cylinder 18 and
a circular bottom panel 20. The cylindrical container 12 has an opening (not illustrated)
for the charge and discharge of the dehydrated cake and the dust. The bottom panel
20 and the cylinder 18 are installed in an integrated manner, and the bottom panel
20 is made to rotate along with the cylinder 18 by a driving force. The cylindrical
container 12 may have a top panel for sealing the top of the cylindrical container
12.
[0020] The stirring impeller 14 has a rotation axis 22 and plural stirring blades 24. The
rotation axis 22 is located at a position shifted from the center of the cylindrical
container 12. The stirring impeller 14 is made to rotate by a driving force which
is supplied from an unillustrated driving unit placed above the cylindrical container
12. As just described, each of the cylindrical container 12 and the stirring impeller
14 is made to rotate by a driving force which is supplied from a corresponding one
of the different driving units so as to separately rotate. The rotation axis 22 may
also be located at the center of the cylindrical container 12.
[0021] The stirring blades 24 are fitted to the rotation axis 22 so as to extend outward
from the axis in a radial manner. The stirring blades 24 are fitted at two positions
of the rotation axis 22 which are vertically separated from each other so as to extend
in six directions at intervals of 60° at each of the positions.
[0022] The number of the stirring blades 24 and the fitting positions in the vertical direction
of the stirring blades 24 may appropriately be changed in accordance with the amounts
of the dehydrated cake and the dust which are charged into the cylindrical container
12.
[0023] While the bottom panel 20 rotates, for example, clockwise, the stirring impeller
14 rotates counterclockwise with the dehydrated cake being contained in the cylindrical
container 12. As a result of the bottom panel 20 rotating clockwise, the dehydrated
cake contained in the cylindrical container 12 rotates clockwise following the rotation
direction of the bottom panel 20. The dehydrated cake rotating clockwise is cracked
as a result of impinging on the stirring impeller 14 rotating counterclockwise. The
rotation direction of each of the bottom panel 20 and the stirring impeller 14 is
not limited to clockwise or counterclockwise. The rotation directions of the bottom
panel 20 and the stirring impeller 14 may be the same or different from each other.
[0024] Although the stirring apparatus 10 is horizontally positioned in the example illustrated
in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, the stirring apparatus 10 may be obliquely positioned with respect
to a horizontal plane. It is acceptable that the cylindrical container 12 only be
obliquely positioned with respect to a horizontal plane while a shaft of the stirring
impeller 14 is vertically supported. By using the stirring apparatus 10, the dehydrated
cake is finely cracked, and the cracked dehydrated cake and the dust are mixed. With
this, since water contained in the dehydrated cake is efficiently transferred to the
dust, there is a decrease in the amount of powder remaining non-granulated.
[0025] Fig. 3 is a diagram illustrating a testing method used for checking a change in the
viscidity of a dehydrated cake which has been subjected to a shearing force of a certain
magnitude or more. As illustrated in Fig. 3, a container 26 having a diameter of 155
mm is filled with the cracked dehydrated cake, which has been cracked by using the
stirring apparatus 10, and an SS-made testing plate 28 is thereafter pushed downward
in the direction perpendicular to the bottom surface into the dehydrated cake with
a pushing load of 200 N. This testing plate 28 is pulled out upward in the direction
perpendicular to the bottom surface at a speed of 3 mm/sec while the pulling-out force
is measured by using an Autograph (registered trademark) produced by Shimadzu Corporation.
The testing conditions and the results are given in Table 1.
[Table 1]
Condition |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Cracking Treatment |
Not Done |
Done |
Done |
Circumferential Speed of Stirring Impeller (m/sec) |
- |
3.3 |
9.3 |
Rotational Speed of Container (rpm) |
- |
50 |
50 |
Stirring time (sec) |
- |
5 |
60 |
Pulling-out Force (kPa) |
2.9 |
3.6 |
9.4 |
[0026] As indicated in Table 1, by increasing the circumferential speed of the stirring
impeller in the stirring apparatus 10, the rotational speed, and the granulating time,
there was an increase in the pulling-out force of the testing plate 28. From this
result, it is clarified that, by applying a shearing force to the dehydrated cake
to finely crack the dehydrated cake, there is an increase in the viscidity of the
dehydrated cake.
[0027] Since there is an increase in the viscidity of the dehydrated cake as a result of
cracking the dehydrated cake by using the stirring apparatus 10 as just described,
and since the dehydrated cake which has been finely cracked and the dust are mixed,
there is a further decrease in the amount of powder remaining non-granulated. Moreover,
since fine particles, which tend to adhere to a conveyer junction when conveyer transport
is performed, are taken into the granulated material, there is a decrease in the amount
of adhesion of the fine particles to a conveyer junction, which results in a decrease
in the amount of adhesion to a conveyer junction.
[0028] It is possible to adjust the water content of the granulated material by adjusting
the mixing ratio of dust, which has a low water content. In the case where the water
content of the granulated material is high, since the viscidity of the cracked dehydrated
cake remains, the granulated material adheres to a conveyer junction when conveyer
transport is performed. Therefore, in the present embodiment, the mixing amount of
the dust is adjusted so that the water content of the granulated material is in the
range of 10 mass% or more and 18 mass% or less.
[0029] It is possible to adjust the content of the granulated material having a particle
size of 0.125 mm or more by adjusting the circumferential speed of the stirring impeller
14 and the rotation time of the stirring impeller 14. In the case where granulating
raw materials having an identical composition are granulated by using stirring apparatuses
10 having an identical configuration, and the rotation time of the stirring impeller
14 is identical, the content of the granulated material having a particle size of
0.125 mm or more increases with an increase in the circumferential speed of the stirring
impeller 14. Similarly, in the case where granulating raw materials having an identical
composition are granulated by using identical stirring apparatuses 10, and the circumferential
speed of the stirring impeller 14 is identical, the content of the granulated material
having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more increases with an increase in the rotation
time of the stirring impeller 14. In the present embodiment, the circumferential speed
and rotation time of the stirring impeller 14 are adjusted so that the content of
the granulated material having an average particle size of 0.125 mm or more is 90
mass% or more.
EXAMPLES
[0030] Hereafter, examples in which granulated materials according to the present embodiment
were manufactured and the transportability of the granulated materials was evaluated
will be described. In the present examples, to manufacture plural kinds of granulated
materials so that the content of the granulated material having an average particle
size of 0.125 mm or more varies from one kind to another, the granulated materials
were manufactured by using two different granulating methods. In one of the granulating
methods, an EIRICH intensive mixer type RV02, which has the same configuration as
that of the stirring apparatus 10 illustrated in Fig. 1, was used, and the granulated
material was manufactured by varying the circumferential speed of the stirring impeller
and the granulating time to vary the content of the granulated material having a particle
size of 0.125 mm or more. In the other granulating method, a drum-type granulating
apparatus was used to intensify granulation, and the granulated material was manufactured
by varying the granulating time and the rotational speed of the drum to vary the content
of the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more.
[0031] The water content of the dehydrated cake prepared by dehydrating the sludge, which
was used as a granulating raw material, was 20 mass%, and the water content of the
dust was 0 mass%. By varying the mixing ratios of the dehydrated cake and dust, the
water content of the granulated material was adjusted. For example, to manufacture
a granulated material having a water content of 16 mass%, 80 mass% of a dehydrated
cake and 20 mass% of dust were mixed. The granulated materials of the examples of
the present invention and the granulated materials of the comparative examples were
manufactured in an amount of 8 kg each. The compositions of the dust and the sludge
used in the tests are given in Table 2 below. In Table 2, the expression "T-Fe" is
an abbreviation for "total Fe" and denotes the mass content of iron atoms in the dust
or the sludge. In Table 2, the reason why the total content of the constituents of
the dust or the sludge is not equal to 100 is because the dust or the sludge contains
other constituents, which are not given in the table, such as CaO.
[Table 2]
|
T-Fe |
SiO2 |
Al2O3 |
C |
Metallic Fe |
Dust |
31.9 |
6.7 |
3.3 |
13.2 |
0.3 |
Sludge |
60.5 |
1.6 |
0.6 |
10.7 |
31.9 |
[0032] The granulated materials manufactured as described above were evaluated in terms
of the content of the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more
and adhesiveness. The content of a granulated material having a particle size of 0.125
mm or more was calculated by using the mass of the granulated material which had been
dried at a temperature of 110°C for 12 hours 4remaining on a sieve having a sieve
mesh of 0.125 mm.
[0033] Fig. 4 is a side view of an adhesiveness testing apparatus 30. The adhesiveness testing
apparatus 30 has a belt conveyer 32 and a chute 34, which simulates a conveyer junction.
In the evaluation of the amount of adhesion of the granulated material utilizing the
adhesiveness testing apparatus 30, after having charged 8 kg of the granulated material
from the position indicated by arrow 36, transported the granulated material by the
belt conveyer 32, and dropped the granulated material onto the chute 34, the amount
of granulated material which had adhered to the chute 34 was determined. The charging
flow rate of the granulated material and the speed of the belt conveyer 32 were adjusted
so that the transport rate of the granulated material was 0.8 kg/sec. The amount of
adhesion was evaluated in two cases, that is, a case without water spray and a case
with water spray. In the case with water spray, the granulated material was transported
while being sprayed with water 38 at a water spray rate of 185 g/min for simulation
of rain. The granulating conditions of the granulated materials and the evaluation
results are given in Table 3 and Table 4.
[Table 3]
|
Item |
Example 1 |
Comparative Example 1 |
Manufacturing Condition |
Granulating Method |
Stirring Apparatus |
Drum-Type Granulating Apparatus |
Granulating Time (sec) |
60 |
60 |
Circumferential Speed of Stirring Impeller (m/sec) |
6.6 |
- |
Rotational Speed of Container (rpm) |
50 |
20 |
Granulated Material Property |
Water Content of Granulated Material (mass%) |
16 |
16 |
Content of +0.125 mm (mass%) |
96.9 |
86.3 |
Result |
Amount of Adhesion without Water Spray (g) |
0.9 |
5.3 |
Amount of Adhesion with Water Spray (g) |
3.2 |
18.7 |
[Table 4]
|
Item |
Example 2 |
Example 1 |
Example 3 |
Comparative Example 2 |
Comparative Example 3 |
Granulated Material Property |
Water Content of Granulated Material (mass%) |
10 |
16 |
18 |
8 |
20 |
Content of +0.125 mm (mass%) |
93.3 |
96.9 |
98.6 |
79.9 |
99.9 |
Result |
Amount of Adhesion without Water Spray (g) |
0.5 |
0.9 |
3.3 |
5.3 |
8.8 |
Amount of Adhesion with Water Spray (g) |
5.7 |
3.2 |
4.5 |
40.4 |
16.1 |
[0034] In Table 3 and Table 4, the term "Granulating Time" denotes the time for which the
stirring impeller was rotated in the case where a stirring apparatus was used. On
the other hand, in the case where a drum-type granulating apparatus was used, the
term "Granulating Time" denotes the time for which the drum was rotated. The term
"Content of +0.125 mm" denotes the content of the granulated material having a particle
size of 0.125 mm or more. Also, in the Tables below, the term "Content of +0.125 mm"
denotes the content of the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm
or more.
[0035] As indicated in Table 3, regardless of whether or not water spray was performed,
the amount of adhesion of the granulated material in the case of Example 1 where the
content of the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more was
90 mass% or more was less than that in the case of Comparative Example 1 where the
content of the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more was
less than 90 mass%.
[0036] As indicated in Table 4, regardless of whether or not water spray was performed,
the amounts of adhesion of the granulated materials in the case of Examples 1 through
3 where the water contents of the granulated materials were in the range of 10 mass%
or more and 18 mass% or less were less than those in the case of Comparative Example
2 where the water content of the granulated material was less than 10 mass% and in
the case of Comparative Example 3 where the water content was more than 18 mass%.
[0037] From these results, it is clarified that it is possible to decrease the amount of
adhesion to the chute 34, which is placed at the position of a conveyer junction,
by controlling the content of the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125
mm or more to be 90 mass% or more and the water content of the granulated material
to be 10 mass% or more and 18 mass% or less. It is preferable that the content of
the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more be as high as possible,
it is more preferable that the content be 93 mass% or more or even more preferably
97 mass% or more, and the upper limit of the content is 100 mass%. It is preferable
that the water content of the granulated material be 12 mass% or more and 17 mass%
or less or more preferably 14 mass% or more and 16 mass% or less.
[0038] Hereafter, the results of the investigations regarding the effect of the surface
water content of the granulated material will be described. By using the dust and
the sludge used for the investigations whose results are given in Table 3 and Table
4, by mixing and granulating 80 mass% of the dehydrated cake and 20 mass% of the dust,
granulated materials having a water content of 16 mass% were manufactured in an amount
of 8 kg each. In the case of Example 4, to obtain a granulated material having a low
surface water content, by rotating the drum-type granulating apparatus (rotational
speed: 20 rpm) for 360 seconds for granulation, a granulated material having a surface
water content of less than 10 mass%, that is, 8.3 mass%, was manufactured.
[0039] In the case of Example 6, to obtain a granulated material having a high surface water
content, after having manufactured a granulated material by using the Intensive Mixer
(circumferential speed of stirring impeller: 6.6 m/s, granulating time: 60 seconds),
the granulated material was left in atmospheric air until the water content decreased
to 1 mass%. Next, by rotating the drum-type granulating apparatus (rotational speed:
20 rpm) for 60 seconds while spraying water in an amount equivalent to a water content
of 1 mass%, a granulated material having a high surface water content was manufactured.
The manufacturing conditions and evaluation results of these granulated materials
are given in Table 5. The surface water contents of these granulated materials were
determined by using a near-infrared moisture gauge.
[Table 5]
|
Item |
Example 4 |
Example 5 |
Example 1 |
Example 6 |
Manufacturing Condition |
Granulating Method |
Drum-Type Granulating Apparatus |
Stirring Apparatus |
Stirring Apparatus |
Stirring Apparatus + Drum-Type Granulating Apparatus |
Granulating Time (sec) |
360 |
30 |
60 |
60 + 60 |
Granulated Material Property |
Water Content of Granulated Material (mass%) |
16 |
16 |
16 |
16 |
Content of +0.125 mm (mass%) |
92.5 |
93.2 |
96.9 |
99.4 |
Surface Water Content of Granulated Material (mass%) |
8 |
11 |
15 |
17 |
Result |
Amount of Adhesion without Water Spray (g) |
1.5 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
1.6 |
Amount of Adhesion with Water Spray (g) |
7.4 |
6.3 |
3.2 |
5.6 |
[0040] As indicated in Table 5, when water spray was not performed, the amounts of adhesion
in the case of Example 5 and Example 1 where the surface water content was 10 mass%
or more and 15 mass% or less were less than those in the case of Example 4 where the
surface water content was less than 10 mass% and in the case of Example 6 where the
surface water content was more than 15 mass%. On the other hand, when water spray
was performed, the amount of adhesion in the case of Example 5 was slightly more than
that in the case of Example 6. This is considered to be because there was a decrease
in the effect of the surface water content due to water spray. Even when water spray
was performed, the amount of adhesion in the case of Example 5 was less than that
in the case of Example 4, and the amount of adhesion in the case of Example 6 was
more than that in the case of Example 1. Therefore, it is clarified that, even when
water spray was performed, there was a tendency for the amount of adhesion to the
chute 34 to decrease as a result of controlling the surface water content to be 10
mass% or more and 15 mass% or less. From these results, it may be said that it is
possible to further decrease the amount of adhesion to the chute 34, which is placed
at the position of a conveyer junction, by controlling the surface water content of
the granulated material to be 10 mass% or more and 15 mass% or less. It is preferable
that the surface water content of the granulated material be 11 mass% or more and
15 mass% or less or more preferably 12 mass% or more and 14 mass% or less.
[0041] As indicated by Example 4, it is possible to manufacture the granulated material
according to the present embodiment not only by using the stirring apparatus 10 but
also by using the drum-type granulating apparatus. However, the drum-type granulating
apparatus is poor in terms of capability to crack a dehydrated cake. As a result,
there is an increase in the granulating time required to manufacture the granulated
material according to the present embodiment. Therefore, it is preferable that the
granulated material according to the present embodiment be manufactured by using a
stirring apparatus instead of a drum-type granulating apparatus.
[0042] Hereafter, the results of the investigations regarding stirring conditions for controlling
the content of the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more
to be within the appropriate range will be described. By using the dust and the sludge
used for the investigations whose results are given in Table 3 and Table 4, by mixing
and granulating 80 mass% of the dehydrated cake and 20 mass% of the dust by using
the EIRICH intensive mixer type RV02 with various circumferential speeds of the stirring
impeller and with various granulating times, granulated materials having a water content
of 16 mass% were manufactured in an amount of 8 kg each. The granulating conditions
and evaluation results of these granulated materials are given in Table 6 and Table
7.
[Table 6]
|
Item |
Comparative Example 4 |
Example 7 |
Example 1 |
Example 8 |
Manufacturing Condition |
Granulating Method |
Stirring Apparatus |
Stirring Apparatus |
Stirring Apparatus |
Stirring Apparatus |
Granulating Time (sec) |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
Circumferential Speed of Stirring Impeller (m/sec) |
3.3 |
4.7 |
6.6 |
9.4 |
Granulated Material Property |
Content of +0.125 mm (mass%) |
88.7 |
89.8 |
96.9 |
99.2 |
Surface Water Content of Granulated Material (mass%) |
6 |
8 |
15 |
15 |
Result |
Amount of Adhesion without Water Spray (g) |
2.9 |
2.2 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
Amount of Adhesion with Water Spray (g) |
16.1 |
13.2 |
3.2 |
2.7 |
[Table 7]
|
Item |
Example 9 |
Example 1 |
Example 10 |
Manufacturing Condition |
Granulating Method |
Stirring Apparatus |
Stirring Apparatus |
Stirring Apparatus |
Granulating Time (sec) |
30 |
60 |
120 |
Circumferential Speed of Stirring Impeller (m/sec) |
6.6 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
Granulated Material Property |
Content of +0.125 mm (mass%) |
95.1 |
96.9 |
97.2 |
Surface Water Content of Granulated Material (mass%) |
13 |
15 |
14 |
Result |
Amount of Adhesion without Water Spray (g) |
1.2 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
Amount of Adhesion with Water Spray (g) |
3.3 |
3.2 |
2.4 |
[0043] As indicated in Table 6, there was an increase in the content of the granulated material
having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more as a result of increasing the circumferential
speed of the stirring impeller, and the content of the granulated material having
a particle size of 0.125 mm or more was 90 mass% or more in the case where the circumferential
speed of the stirring impeller was 4.7 m/s or more.
[0044] From this result, it is clarified that, when the granulating time is 60 seconds,
it is possible to control the content of the granulated material having a particle
size of 0.125 mm or more to be 90 mass% or more by controlling the circumferential
speed of the stirring impeller to be 4.7 m/s or more. It is clarified that the content
of the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more tends to increase
with an increase in the circumferential speed of the stirring impeller and that the
amount of adhesion tends to decrease with an increase in the content of the granulated
material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more regardless of whether or not water
spray is performed. Since it was possible to control the content of the granulated
material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more to be almost 100 mass% by controlling
the circumferential speed of the stirring impeller to be 9.4 m/sec, it is not possible
to further increase the content of the granulated material having a particle size
of 0.125 mm or more in the case where the circumferential speed is more than 9.4 m/sec.
Therefore, it is preferable that the circumferential speed of the stirring impeller
be 9.4 m/sec or less.
[0045] As indicated in Table 7, it was possible to increase the content of the granulated
material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more by increasing the granulating
time, and it was possible to control the content of the granulated material having
a particle size of 0.125 mm or more to be 90 mass% or more by controlling the granulating
time to be 30 seconds or more.
[0046] From these results, it is clarified that, when the circumferential speed of the stirring
impeller is 6.6 m/s, it is possible to control the content of the granulated material
having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more to be 90 mass% or more by controlling the
granulating time to be 30 seconds or more. It is clarified that the content of the
granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more tends to increase with
an increase in granulating time and that the amount of adhesion to the chute 34 tends
to decrease with an increase in the content of the granulated material having a particle
size of 0.125 mm or more regardless of whether or not water spray is performed. Since
it is clarified that the amount of adhesion to the chute 34 tends to decrease with
an increase in the content of the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125
mm or more, it is clarified that the upper limit of the content of the granulated
material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more is 100 mass%.
[0047] As just described, since it is clarified that the amount of adhesion tends to decrease
with an increase in the content of the granulated material having a particle size
of 0.125 mm or more in Table 6 and Table 7, it is clarified that the content of the
granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more has an effect on the
amount of adhesion and that it is possible to decrease the amount of adhesion of the
granulated material to the chute 34, which is placed at a position of a conveyer junction,
by increasing the content of the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125
mm or more to be 90 mass% or more. Although there is an increase in the amount of
adhesion to the chute 34 when it rains, it is also clarified that it is possible to
significantly decrease the amount of adhesion to the chute 34 when it rains by increasing
the content of the granulated material having a particle size of 0.125 mm or more
to be 90 mass% or more.
[0048] It is possible to use the granulated material according to the present embodiment
for manufacturing sintered ore. For example, by adding the granulated material according
to the present embodiment in a blending process of blending an iron-containing raw
material, a CaO-containing raw material, and a binding material to obtain a sintering
raw material, by adding water to the sintering raw material to granulate the sintering
raw material in a granulating process, and by sintering the granulated sintering raw
material by using a sintering machine to obtain sintered ore in a sintering process.
Since it is possible to transport the granulated material according to the present
embodiment by a belt conveyer, it is possible to transport the granulated material
by a belt conveyer to a position where the raw materials such as an Fe-containing
raw material are blended, and it is possible to easily mix the granulated material
with the other raw materials.
[0049] Moreover, instead of the method in which the granulated material according to the
present embodiment is added in the blending process, a method in which the granulated
material according to the present embodiment is added in the posterior part of the
granulating process so that the outer layer of the granulated sintering raw material
is formed of the granulated material according to the present embodiment may be used.
As just described, it is possible to use the granulated material according to the
present embodiment for manufacturing sintered ore so as to be reused as an iron source
and a heat source when sintered ore is manufactured.
Reference Signs List
[0050]
- 10
- stirring apparatus
- 12
- cylindrical container
- 14
- stirring impeller
- 16
- weir
- 18
- cylinder
- 20
- bottom panel
- 22
- rotation axis
- 24
- stirring blade
- 26
- container
- 28
- testing plate
- 30
- adhesiveness testing apparatus
- 32
- belt conveyer
- 34
- chute
- 36
- arrow
- 38
- water