FIELD
[0001] This application is related to novel variable valve actuation systems for internal
combustion engines, and more specifically to novel variable valve actuation systems
with compatible engine cylinder head arrangements.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Global environmental and economic concerns regarding increasing fuel consumption
and greenhouse gas emission, the rising cost of energy worldwide, and demands for
lower operating cost, are driving changes to legislative regulations and consumer
demand. As these regulations and requirements become more stringent, advanced engine
technologies must be developed and implemented to realize desired benefits.
[0003] Figure 1B illustrates several valve train arrangements in use today. In both Type
I (21) and Type II (22), arrangements, a cam shaft with one or more valve actuating
lobes 30 is located above an engine valve 29 (overhead cam). In a Type I (21) valvetrain,
the overhead cam lobe 30 directly drives the valve through a hydraulic lash adjuster
(HLA) 812. In a Type II (22) valve train, an overhead cam lobe 30 drives a rocker
arm 25, and the first end of the rocker arm pivots over an HLA 812, while the second
end actuates the valve 29.
[0004] In Type III (23), the first end of the rocker arm 28 rides on and is positioned above
a cam lobe 30 while the second end of the rocker arm 28 actuates the valve 29. As
the cam lobe 30 rotates, the rocker arm pivots about a fixed shaft 31. An HLA 812
can be implemented between the valve 29 tip and the rocker arm 28.
[0005] In Type V (24), the cam lobe 30 indirectly drives the first end of the rocker arm
26 with a push rod 27. An HLA 812 is shown implemented between the cam lobe 30 and
the push rod 27. The second end of the rocker arm 26 actuates the valve 29. As the
cam lobe 30 rotates, the rocker arm pivots about a fixed shaft 31.
[0006] As Figure 1A also illustrates, industry projections for Type II (22) valve trains
in automotive engines, shown as a percentage of the overall market, are predicted
to be the most common configuration produced by 2019.
[0007] Technologies focused on Type II (22) valve trains, that improve the overall efficiency
of the gasoline engine by reducing friction, pumping, and thermal losses are being
introduced to make the best use of the fuel within the engine. Some of these variable
valve actuation (VVA) technologies have been introduced and documented.
[0008] A VVA device may be a variable valve lift (VVL) system, a cylinder deactivation (CDA)
system such as that described
U.S. Patent Application No. 13/532,777, filed June 25, 2012 "Single Lobe Deactivating Rocker Arm " or other valve actuation system. As noted, these mechanisms are developed to
improve performance, fuel economy, and/or reduce emissions of the engine. Several
types of the VVA rocker arm assemblies include an inner rocker arm within an outer
rocker arm that are biased together with torsion springs. A latch, when in the latched
position causes both the inner and outer rocker arms to move as a single unit. When
unlatched, the rocker arms are allowed to move independent of each other.
[0009] Switching rocker arms allow for control of valve actuation by alternating between
latched and unlatched states, usually involving the inner arm and outer arm, as described
above. In some circumstances, these arms engage different cam lobes, such as low-lift
lobes, high-lift lobes, and no-lift lobes. Mechanisms are required for switching rocker
arm modes in a manner suited for operation of internal combustion engines.
[0010] Rocker arms that are driven by a camshaft to actuate the cylinder intake and exhaust
valves are typically mounted on the cylinder head.
[0011] There are structures extending from the cylinder head such as cam towers to secure
and support the camshafts in an overhead cam design. There are also spark plug tubes
that extend upward from the top of each cylinder through the head to receive spark
plugs. There may be other structures that extend from the cylinder head that support
elements of the valve train.
[0012] In
US 2009/0084340 A there is disclosed a cylinder head having a disposition space in which valves which
open and close combustion chambers, rocker arms, intake and exhaust camshafts which
actuate the rocker arms, and rocker arm shafts which supports the rocker arms are
disposed. A housing of the cylinder head assembly comprises supporting structures
for supporting the intake and exhaust camshafts.
[0013] As described above, some embodiments of VVA switching rocker arm assemblies include
a rocker arm within a rocker arm that are biased together with a spring on either
side. Since the inner/outer arm design often employs a roller in the center to engage
a cam lobe, it is advantageous to keep the roller the same width of the cam lobe.
Therefore, the structures on either side of the roller add width to the rocker assembly
causing it to be wider than original non-VVA rocker arms and too wide to fit certain
cylinder head designs.
[0014] For example, some Type II engine heads employ cam towers that have a hydraulic lifter
adjuster (HLA) near the centerline of the head and spark plug tubes that obstruct
one side of a wide VVA switching rocker arm assembly.
[0015] Many engine parts are designed by manufacturers to work with a specific cylinder
head, making the cylinder head very difficult to modify because changes may impact
many interrelated components, possibly increasing cost and causing assembly clearance
issues. In some cases, VVA switching systems do not fit in the space defined by the
existing head design.
[0016] One example of VVA technology used to alter operation and improve fuel economy in
Type II gasoline engines is discrete variable valve lift (DVVL), also sometimes referred
to as a DVVL switching rocker arm. DVVL works by limiting engine cylinder intake air
flow with an engine valve that uses discrete valve lift states versus standard "part
throttling". A second example is cylinder deactivation (CDA). Fuel economy can be
improved by using CDA at partial load conditions in order to operate select combustion
cylinders at higher loads while turning off other cylinders.
[0017] The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) showed a 4% improvement in
fuel economy when using DVVL applied to various passenger car engines. An earlier
report, sponsored by the United States Department of Energy lists the benefit of DVVL
at 4.5% fuel economy improvement. Since automobiles spend most of their life at "part
throttle" during normal cruising operation, a substantial fuel economy improvement
can be realized when these throttling losses are minimized. For CDA, studies show
a fuel economy gain, after considering the minor loss due to the deactivated cylinders,
ranging between 2 and 14%.Currently, there is a need for VVA rocker arms for increased
performance, economy and/or reduced emissions that fit specific engine head designs.
[0018] Switching rocker arms have been used to alter the operation and performance of the
engines. For example, specialized rocker arms may be used that provide variable valve
actuation (WA), such as variable valve lift (VVL), and cylinder deactivation (CDA).
U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/636,277 (EATN-0205-P01, pending) describes in detail the structure and function of a VVL
switching rocker arm, and the reader is referred to this document for a full description.
These have been developed that improve performance, fuel economy, and/or reduce emissions
of the engine. Several types of the VVA rocker arm assemblies include an inner rocker
arm within an outer rocker arm that are biased together with torsion springs. A latch,
when in the latched position causes both the inner and outer rocker arms to move as
a single unit. When unlatched, the rocker arms are allowed to move independent of
each other. The latch of the inner arm rests on a latch seat of the outer arm. (Alternatively,
the latch may be on the outer arm.)
[0019] In the past is was thought that in order to utilize a round rocker arm latch you
would need the mating surface of the other rocker arm in the assembly to have a ground
in curved mating surface. This mating surface can be referred to as a latch seat.
[0020] This latch seat would need to have a radius that very closely matches the latch radius.
A seat that is slightly too small causes sticking, and a delayed release. It also
causes the latch to impact the corners of the latch seat during engagement of the
latch. A larger seat or smaller seat could cause undesirable wear.
[0021] Due to the tolerances, it would need to be processed by way of grinding. This would
require more exact and expensive manufacturing processes. Also, the latch should not
be restricting from properly extending and retracting.
[0022] Another latch design included creating a number of latches, measuring each and sorting
them by latch width. The proper latch was selected having a specific shelf height
from an assortment of latches with varying shelf heights to result in a proper lash.
This was time-consuming and required an array of parts.
[0023] As indicated above, at least some VVA rocker arm assemblies are wider than conventional
rocker arms. The increased width. tends to interfere with the spark plug tubes, cam
towers and other structures of the head. Without modifications, the VVA rocker arm
assemblies may not fit existing head designs, and cannot be used. Changes may be required
to be made to the head design to accommodate the VVA rocker arm assemblies. However,
large changes to the head design may affect parts manufactured by other manufacturers
that interface with the head. Therefore, it would be beneficial to provide a head
that has small modifications that would allow use of the VVA rocker arm assemblies.
[0024] Currently, there is a need for a head arrangement that can accommodate a VVA system
while still being compatible with other equipment that interfaces with the head.
SUMMARY
[0025] The present invention is a cylinder head assembly as it defined in claims 1 and 8.
[0026] Advanced VVA systems for piston-type internal combustion engines combine valve lift
control devices, such as CDA or DVVL switching rocker arms, valve lift actuation methods,
such as hydraulic actuation using pressurized engine oil, software and hardware control
systems, and enabling technologies. Enabling technologies may include sensing and
instrumentation, OCV design, DFHLA design, torsion springs, specialized coatings,
algorithms, physical arrangements, etc. Innovative modifications are made to the cylinder
head assemblies to meet space requirements of VVA systems.
[0027] In an embodiment, a switching rocker arm assembly is disclosed having a plurality
of rocker arms and additional structures connected together having manufacturing tolerances
that introduce mechanical lash, a latch with a latch pin and a latch seat, the latch
seat adapted to receive and secure the latch pin. The latch seat comprises an indentation
having a shape that is complementary to that of the latch pin; the indentation has
a depth chosen to compensate for at least a portion of the mechanical lash to result
in a predefined lash.
[0028] In embodiments, an economical switching rocker arm assembly is disclosed that exhibits
a predetermined lash even though this is constructed with parts having tolerances
greater than prior art designs. The rocker arm assembly a first rocker arm manufactured
with greater tolerances than prior art designs having with a first end and second
end. It also has a second rocker arm manufactured with greater tolerances that prior
art designs having a first end pivotally connected to the first end of the first rocker
arm, and a roller bearing on the first rocker arm adapted to ride upon a cam and actuate
the first rocker arm. The rocker arm assembly has a latch having a latch pin on the
second end of one of the first and second arms and a latch seat on the second end
of the other rocker arm, the latch operating to cause the arms to be fixed relative
to each other when latched and allowed to pivot independently of each other when not
latched;. The latch seat has an indentation shaped to receive the latch pin and sized
to compensate for at least a portion of the increase lash caused by increased manufacturing
tolerances, and result in a predefined lash.
[0029] In an embodiment, a modified rocker assembly is disclosed having an obstructed side
and a non-obstructed side, having an outer structure having a first end, an inner
rocker structure fitting within the outer structure, the inner structure also having
a first end. The modified rocker assembly has an axle pivotally connecting the first
ends of inner structure to the outer structure, such that the inner structure may
rotate within the outer structure around the axle. At least one torsion spring on
one side of axle, rotationally biases the inner structure relative to the outer structure.
The outer structure, on the obstructed side as it extends from the second end toward
the first end is offset toward the non-obstructed side creating a first offset portion
to provide additional clearance on the obstructed side. This design allows the modified
rocker arm to fit into an engine head having an obstruction on its obstruction side.
[0030] In an embodiment, a modified rocker assembly is disclosed having an obstructed side
and a non-obstructed side, with an outer structure having a first end, an inner rocker
structure fitting within the outer structure, the inner structure also having a first
end. An axle pivotally connects the first ends of inner structure to the outer structure,
such that the inner structure may rotate within the outer structure around the axle.
At least one torsion spring is mounted on the non-obstructed side of the axle that
rotationally biases the inner structure relative to the outer structure. As the outer
structure on the obstructed side extends from the second end toward the first end,
the outer structure is offset toward the non-obstructed side creating a first offset
portion. The first offset portion provides additional clearance on the obstructed
side.
[0031] In an embodiment, a modified rocker assembly is disclosed having an obstructed side
and a non-obstructed side. The modified rocker assembly has an outer structure having
a first end with an offset portion, an inner rocker structure fitting within the outer
structure. The inner structure also has a first end. An axle pivotally connects the
first ends of inner structure to the outer structure, such that the inner structure
may rotate within the outer structure around the axle. The modified rocker assembly
has at least one torsion spring on one side of the axle, rotationally biasing the
inner structure relative to the outer structure. As the outer structure on the obstructed
side extends from the second end toward the first end, the outer structure smoothly
curves toward the non-obstructed side. This creates a first offset portion that provides
additional clearance on the obstructed side. This allows this embodiment to fit in
an engine head that has an obstruction on the obstructed side.
[0032] In one embodiment, an advanced discrete variable valve lift (DVVL) system is described.
The advanced discrete variable valve lift (DVVL) system was designed to provide two
discrete valve lift states in a single rocker arm. Embodiments of the approach presented
relate to the Type II valve train described above and shown in Figure 1B. Embodiments
of the system presented herein may apply to a passenger car engine (having four cylinders
in embodiments) with an electro-hydraulic oil control valve, dual feed hydraulic lash
adjuster (DFHLA), and DVVL switching rocker arm. The DVVL switching rocker arm embodiments
described herein focus on the design and development of a switching roller finger
follower (SRFF) rocker arm system which enables two-mode discrete variable valve lift
on end pivot roller finger follower valve trains. This switching rocker arm configuration
includes a low friction roller bearing interface for the low lift event, and retains
normal hydraulic lash adjustment for maintenance free valve train operation.
[0033] Mode switching (i.e., from low to high lift or vice versa) is accomplished within
one cam revolution, resulting in transparency to the driver. The SRFF prevents significant
changes to the overhead required for installing in existing engine designs. Load carrying
surfaces at the cam interface may comprise a roller bearing for low lift operation,
and a diamond like carbon coated slider pad for high lift operation. Among other aspects,
the teachings of the present application is able to reduce mass and moment of inertia
while increasing stiffness to achieve desired dynamic performance in low and high
lift modes.
[0034] A diamond-like carbon coating (DLC coating) allows higher slider interface stresses
in a compact package. Testing results show that this technology is robust and meets
all lifetime requirements with some aspects extending to six times the useful life
requirements. Alternative materials and surface preparation methods were screened,
and results showed DLC coating to be the most viable alternative. This application
addresses the technology developed to utilize a Diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating
on the slider pads of the DVVL switching rocker arm.
[0035] System validation test results reveal that the system meets dynamic and durability
requirements. Among other aspects, this patent application also addresses the durability
of the SRFF design for meeting passenger car durability requirements. Extensive durability
tests were conducted for high speed, low speed, switching, and cold start operation.
High engine speed test results show stable valve train dynamics above 7000 engine
rpm. System wear requirements met end-of-life criteria for the switching, sliding,
rolling and torsion spring interfaces. One important metric for evaluating wear is
to monitor the change in valve lash. The lifetime requirements for wear showed that
lash changes are within the acceptable window. The mechanical aspects exhibited robust
behavior over all tests including the slider interfaces that contain a diamond like
carbon (DLC) coating.
[0036] With flexible and compact packaging, this DVVL system can be implemented in a multi-cylinder
engine. The DVVL arrangement can be applied to any combination of intake or exhaust
valves on a piston-driven internal combustion engine. Enabling technologies include
OCV, DFHLA, DLC coating. In some cases, innovative cylinder head assemblies and arrangements,
combined with DVVL switching rocker arms, are required to meet space and cost requirements.
For example, cam towers and camshaft support bearings may be eliminated, moved, or
added for certain cylinder head arrangements with limited space, particularly in in-line
4 cylinder and 8 cylinder engines.
[0037] In a second embodiment, an advanced single-lobe cylinder deactivation (CDA) system
is described. The advanced cylinder deactivation CDA system was designed to deactivate
one or more cylinders. Embodiments of the approach presented relate to the Type II
valve train described above and shown in Figure 22. Embodiments of the system presented
herein may apply to a passenger car engine (having a multiple of two cylinders in
embodiments, for example 2, 6, 8) with an electro-hydraulic oil control valve, dual
feed hydraulic lash adjuster (DFHLA), and CDA rocker arm assembly. The CDA rocker
arm assembly embodiments described herein focus on the design and development of a
switching roller finger follower (SRFF) rocker arm system which enables lift/no-lift
operation for end pivot roller finger follower valve trains. This switching rocker
arm configuration includes a low friction roller bearing interface for the cylinder
deactivation event, and retains normal hydraulic lash adjustment for maintenance free
valve train operation.
[0038] Mode switching for the CDA system is accomplished within one cam revolution, resulting
in transparency to the driver. The SRFF prevents significant changes to the overhead
required for installing in existing engine designs. Among other aspects, the teachings
of the present application is able to reduce mass and moment of inertia while increasing
stiffness to achieve desired dynamic performance in either lift or no-lift modes.
[0039] CDA system validation test results reveal that the system meets dynamic and durability
requirements. Among other aspects, this patent application also addresses the durability
of the SRFF design necessary to meet passenger car durability requirements. Extensive
durability tests were conducted for high speed, low speed, switching, and cold start
operation. High engine speed test results show stable valve train dynamics above 7000
engine rpm. System wear requirements met end-of-life criteria for the switching, rolling
and torsion spring interfaces. One important metric for evaluating wear is to monitor
the change in valve lash. The lifetime requirements for wear showed that lash changes
are within the acceptable window. The mechanical aspects exhibited robust behavior
over all tests.
[0040] With flexible and compact packaging, the CDA system can be implemented in a multi-cylinder
engine. Enabling technologies include OCV, DFHLA, and specialized torsion spring design.
In some cases, innovative cylinder head assemblies and arrangements, combined with
CDA switching rocker arms, are required to meet space and cost requirements. For example,
cam towers and camshaft support bearings may be eliminated, moved, or added for certain
cylinder head arrangements with limited space, particularly in in-line 4 cylinder
and 8 cylinder engines.
[0041] A rocker arm is described for engaging a cam having one lift lobe per valve. The
rocker arm includes an outer arm, an inner arm, a pivot axle, a lift lobe contacting
bearing, a bearing axle, and at least one bearing axle spring. The outer arm has a
first and a second outer side arms and outer pivot axle apertures configured for mounting
the pivot axle. The inner arm is disposed between the first and second outer side
arms, and has a first inner side arm and a second inner side arm. The first and second
inner side arms have an inner pivot axle apertures that receive and hold the pivot
axle, and inner bearing axle apertures for mounting the bearing axle.
[0042] The pivot axle fits into the inner pivot axle apertures and the outer pivot axle
apertures.
[0043] The bearing axle is mounted in the bearing axle apertures of the inner arm.
[0044] The bearing axle spring is secured to the outer arm and is in biasing contact with
the bearing axle. The lift lobe contacting bearing is mounted to the bearing axle
between the first and the second inner side arms.
[0045] Another embodiment can be described as a rocker arm for engaging a cam having a single
lift lobe per engine valve. The rocker arm includes an outer arm, an inner arm, a
cam contacting member configured to be capable of transferring motion from the single
lift lobe of the cam to the rocker arm, and at least one biasing spring.
[0046] The rocker arm also includes a first outer side arm and a second outer side arm.
[0047] The inner arm is disposed between the first and the second outer side arms, and has
a first inner side arm and a second inner side arm.
[0048] The inner arm is secured to the outer arm by a pivot axle configured to permit rotating
movement of the inner arm relative to the outer arm about the pivot axle.
[0049] The cam contacting member is disposed between the first and second inner side arm.
[0050] At least one biasing spring is secured to the outer arm and is in biasing contact
with the cam contacting member.
[0051] Another embodiment may be described as a deactivating rocker arm for engaging a cam
having a single lift lobe having a first end and a second end, an outer arm, an inner
arm, a pivot axle, a lift lobe contacting member configured to be capable of transferring
motion from the cam lift lobe to the rocker arm, a latch configured to be capable
of selectively deactivating the rocker arm, and at least one biasing spring.
[0052] The outer arm has a first outer side arm and a second outer side arm, outer pivot
axle apertures configured for mounting the pivot axle, and axle slots configured to
accept the lift lobe contacting member, permitting lost motion movement of the lift
lobe contacting member.
[0053] The inner arm is disposed between the first and second outer side arms, and has a
first inner side arm and a second inner side arm. The first inner side arm and the
second inner side arm have inner pivot axle apertures configured for mounting the
pivot axle, and inner lift lobe contacting member apertures configured for mounting
the lift lobe contacting member.
[0054] The pivot axle is mounted adjacent the first end of the rocker arm and disposed in
the inner pivot axle apertures and the outer pivot axle apertures.
[0055] The latch is disposed adjacent the second end of the rocker arm.
[0056] The lift lobe contacting member mounted in the lift lobe contacting member apertures
of the inner arm and the axle slots of the outer arm and between the pivot axle and
latch.
[0057] The biasing spring is secured to the outer arm and in biasing contact with the lift
lobe contacting member.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0058] It will be appreciated that the illustrated boundaries of elements in the drawings
represent only one example of the boundaries. One of ordinary skill in the art will
appreciate that a single element may be designed as multiple elements or that multiple
elements may be designed as a single element. An element shown as an internal feature
may be implemented as an external feature and vice versa.
[0059] Further, in the accompanying drawings and description that follow, like parts are
indicated throughout the drawings and description with the same reference numerals,
respectively. The figures may not be drawn to scale and the proportions of certain
parts have been exaggerated for convenience of illustration.
Figure 1A illustrates the relative percentage of engine types for 2012 and 2019.
Figure 1B illustrates the general arrangement and market sizes for Type I, Type II,
Type III, and Type V valve trains.
Figure 2 shows the intake and exhaust valve train arrangement
Figure 3 illustrates the major components that comprise the DVVL system, including
hydraulic actuation
Figure 4 illustrates a perspective view of an exemplary switching rocker arm as it
may be configured during operation with a three lobed cam.
Figure 5 is a diagram showing valve lift states plotted against cam shaft crank degrees
for both the intake and exhaust valves for an exemplary DVVL implementation.
Figure 6 is a system control diagram for a hydraulically actuated DVVL rocker arm
assembly.
Figure 7 illustrates the rocker arm oil gallery and control valve arrangement
Figure 8 illustrates the hydraulic actuating system and conditions for an exemplary
DVVL switching rocker arm system during low-lift (unlatched) operation.
Figure 9 illustrates the hydraulic actuating system and conditions for an exemplary
DVVL switching rocker arm system during high-lift (latched) operation.
Figure 10 illustrates a side cut-away view of an exemplary switching rocker arm assembly
with dual feed hydraulic lash adjuster (DFHLA).
Figure 11 is a cut-away view of a DFHLA
Figure 12 illustrates diamond like carbon coating layers
Figure 13 illustrates an instrument used to sense position or relative movement of
a DFHLA ball plunger.
Figure 14 illustrates an instrument used in conjunction with a valve stem to measure
valve movement relative to a known state.
Figures 14A and 14B illustrate a section view of a first linear variable differential
transformer using three windings to measure valve stem movement.
Figures 14C and 14D illustrate a section view of a second linear variable differential
transformer using two windings to measure valve stem movement.
Figure 15 illustrates another perspective view of an exemplary switching rocker arm.
Figure 16 illustrates an instrument designed to sense position and or movement
Figure 17 is a graph that illustrates the relationship between OCV actuating current,
actuating oil pressure, and valve lift state during a transition between high-lift
and low-lift states.
Figure 17A is a graph that illustrates the relationship between OCV actuating current,
actuating oil pressure, and latch state during a latch transition.
Figure 17B is a graph that illustrates the relationship between OCV actuating current,
actuating oil pressure, and latch state during another latch transition.
Figure 17C is a graph that illustrates the relationship between valve lift profiles
and actuating oil pressure for high-lift and low-lift states.
Figure 18 is a control logic diagram for a DVVL system.
Figure 19 illustrates an exploded view of an exemplary switching rocker arm.
Figure 20 is a chart illustrating oil pressure conditions and oil control valve (OCV)
states for both low-lift and high-lift operation of a DVVL rocker arm assembly.
Figures 21-22 illustrate graphs showing the relation between oil temperature and latch
response time.
Figure 23 is a timing diagram showing available switching windows for an exemplary
DVVL switching rocker arm, in a 4-cylinder engine, with actuating oil pressure controlled
by two OCV's each controlling two cylinders.
Figure 24 is a side cutaway view of a DVVL switching rocker arm illustrating latch
pre-loading prior to switching from high-lift to low-lift.
Figure 25 is a side cutaway view of a DVVL switching rocker arm illustrating latch
pre-loading prior to switching from low-lift to high-lift.
Figure 25A is a side cutaway view of a DVVL switching rocker arm illustrating a critical
shift event when switching between low-lift and high-lift.
Figure 26 is an expanded timing diagram showing available switching windows and constituent
mechanical switching times for an exemplary DVVL switching rocker arm, in a 4-cylinder
engine, with actuating oil pressure controlled by two OCV's each controlling two cylinders.
Figure 27 illustrates a perspective view of an exemplary switching rocker arm.
Figure 28 illustrates a top-down view of exemplary switching rocker arm.
Figure 29 illustrates a cross-section view taken along line 29 - 29 in Figure 28.
Figures 30A-30B illustrate a section view of an exemplary torsion spring.
Figure 31 illustrates a bottom perspective view of the outer arm
Figure 32 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the latching mechanism in its latched
state along the line 32, 33 - 32, 33 in Figure 28.
Figure 33 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the latching mechanism in its unlatched
state.
Figure 34 illustrates an alternate latch pin design.
Figures 35A-35F illustrate several retention devices for orientation pin.
Figure 36 illustrates an exemplary latch pin design.
Figure 37 illustrates an alternative latching mechanism.
Figures 38-40 illustrate an exemplary method of assembling a switching rocker arm.
Figure 41 illustrates an alternative embodiment of pin.
Figure 42 illustrates an alternative embodiment of a pin.
Figure 43 illustrates the various lash measurements of a switching rocker arm.
Figure 44 illustrates a perspective view of an exemplary inner arm of a switching
rocker arm.
Figure 45 illustrates a perspective view from below of the inner arm of a switching
rocker arm.
Figure 46 illustrates a perspective view of an exemplary outer arm of a switching
rocker arm .
Figure 47 illustrates a sectional view of a latch assembly of an exemplary switching
rocker arm.
Figure 48 is a graph of lash vs. camshaft angle for a switching rocker arm.
Figure 49 illustrates a side cut-away view of an exemplary switching rocker arm assembly
Figure 50 illustrates a perspective view of the outer arm with an identified region
of maximum deflection when under load conditions.
Figure 51 illustrates a top view of an exemplary switching rocker arm and three-lobed
cam.
Figure 52 illustrates a section view along line 52 - 52 in of Figure 51 of an exemplary
switching rocker arm.
Figure 53 illustrates an exploded view of an exemplary switching rocker arm, showing
the major components that affect inertia for an exemplary switching rocker arm assembly.
Figure 54 illustrates a design process to optimize the relationship between inertia
and stiffness for an exemplary switching rocker assembly.
Figure 55 illustrates a characteristic plot of inertia versus stiffness for design
iterations of an exemplary switching rocker arm assembly.
Figure 56 illustrates a characteristic plot showing stress, deflection, loading, and
stiffness versus location for an exemplary switching rocker arm assembly.
Figure 57 illustrates a characteristic plot showing stiffness versus inertia for a
range of exemplary switching rocker arm assemblies.
Figure 58 illustrates an acceptable range of discrete values of stiffness and inertia
for component parts of multiple DVVL switching rocker arm assemblies
Figure 59 is a side cut-away view of an exemplary switching rocker arm assembly including
a DFHLA and valve.
Figure 60 illustrates a characteristic plot showing a range of stiffness values versus
location for component parts of an exemplary switching rocker arm assembly.
Figure 61 illustrates a characteristic plot showing a range of mass distribution values
versus location for component parts of an exemplary switching rocker arm assembly.
Figure 62 illustrates a test stand measuring latch displacement
Figure 63 is an illustration of a non-firing test stand for testing switching rocker
arm assembly.
Figure 64 is a graph of valve displacement vs. camshaft angle.
Figure 65 illustrates a hierarchy of key tests for testing the durability of a switching
roller finger follower (SRFF) rocker arm assembly.
Figure 66 shows the test protocol in evaluating the SRFF over an Accelerated System
Aging test cycle.
Figure 67 is a pie chart showing the relative testing time for the SRFF durability
testing.
Figure 68 shows a strain gage that was attached to and monitored the SRFF during testing.
Figure 69 is a graph of valve closing velocity for the Low Lift mode.
Figure 70 is a valve drop height distribution.
Figure 71 displays the distribution of critical shifts with respect to camshaft angle.
Figure 72 show an end of a new outer arm before use.
Figure 73 shows typical wear of the outer arm after use.
Figure 74 illustrates average Torsion Spring Load Loss at end-of-life testing.
Figure 75 illustrates the total mechanical lash change of Accelerated System Aging
Tests.
Figure 76 illustrates end-of-life slider pads with the DLC coating, exhibiting minimal
wear.
Figure 77 is a camshaft surface embodiment employing a crown shape.
Figure 78 illustrates a pair of slider pads attached to a support rocker on a test
coupon.
Figure 79A illustrates DLC coating loss early in the testing of a coupon.
Figure 79B shows a typical example of one of the coupons tested at the max design
load with 0.2 degrees of included angle.
Figure 80 is a graph of tested stress level vs. engine lives for a test coupon having
DLC coating.
Figure 81 is a graph showing the increase in engine lifetimes for slider pads having
polished and non-polished surfaces prior to coating with a DLC coating.
Figure 82 is a flowchart illustrating the development of the production grinding and
polishing processes that took place concurrently with the testing.
Figure 83 shows the results of the slider pad angle control relative to three different
grinders.
Figure 84 illustrates surface finish measurements for three different grinders.
Figure 85 illustrates the results of six different fixtures to hold the outer arm
during the slider pad grinding operations.
Figure 86 is a graph of valve closing velocity for the High Lift mode.
Figure 87 illustrates durability test periods
Figure 88 shows a perspective view of an exemplary CDA layout
Figures 89A shows a partial cut-away side elevational view of an exemplary SRFF system
with a latch mechanism and roller bearing.
Figures 89B shows a front elevation view of the exemplary SRFF system of Figure 89A.
Figure 90 is an engine layout showing an exemplary SRFF rocker assembly on the exhaust
and intake valves.
Figure 91 shows a hydraulic fluid control system.
Figure 92 shows an exemplary SRFF system in operation exhibiting normal-lift engine
valve operation.
Figures 93A, 93B and 93C show an exemplary SRFF system in operation exhibiting no-lift
engine valve operation.
Figure 94 shows an example switching window.
Figure 95 shows the effect of camshaft phasing on the switching window.
Figure 96 shows latch response times for an embodiment of the SRFF-1 system.
Figure 97 is a graph showing a switching window times above 40 degrees C for an exemplarySRFF-1
system.
Figure 98 is a graph showing a switching window times taking into account camshaft
phasing and oil temperature for an exemplary SRFF-1 system.
Figure 99 illustrates an exemplary SRFF rocker arm assembly.
Figure 100 illustrates an exploded view of the exemplary SRFF rocker arm assembly
of Figure 99.
Figure 101 illustrates a side view of an exemplary SRFF rocker arm assembly, including
DFHLA, valve stem, and cam lobe.
Figure 102 illustrates an end view of an exemplary SRFF rocker arm assembly, including
DFHLA, valve stem, and cam lobe.
Figure 103 shows latch re-engagement features in case of pressure loss.
Figure 104 shows camshaft alignment of an exemplary SRFF system.
Figure 105 shows forces acting on an RFF employing hydraulic lash adjusters.
Figure 106 shows a force balance for an exemplary SRFF system in a 'no-lift' mode.
Figure 107 is a table showing oil pressure requirements for an exemplary SRFF-1 system.
Figure 108 shows mechanical lash for an exemplary SRFF-1 system.
Figure 109 shows camshaft lift profiles for a three-lobe CDA system versus an exemplary
SRFF system.
Figure 110 is a graphic representation of stiffness vs. moment of inertia for multiple
rocker arm designs.
Figure 111 illustrates the resultant seating closing velocity of an intake valve of
an exemplary SRFF system.
Figure 112 is a table showing a torsion spring test summary.
Figure 113 is a graph showing displacements and pressures during a 'pump-up' test.
Figure 114 shows durability and lash change over a specified testing period for an
exemplary STFF system.
Figure 115 is a perspective view of a prior art cylinder head with parts removed for
clarity.
Figure 116 is an elevational, cross-sectional view of the cylinder head of Figure
115.
Figure 117 is a perspective view of a prior art variable valve lift (VVL) rocker arm
assembly.
Figure 118 is a perspective view of a left-handed (modified) rocker assembly that
provides variable valve lift according to one aspect of the present teachings.
Figure 119 is a top plan view of the modified rocker assembly of Figure 118.
Figure 120 is a side elevational view of the modified rocker assembly 400 of Figures
118-119.
Figure 121 is an end-on elevational view of the modified rocker assembly of Figures
118-120 as viewed from its hinge (first) end.
Figure 122 is an end-on elevational view of the modified rocker assembly of Figures
118-121 as viewed from its latch (second) end.
Figure 123 is a plan view from above the outer structure showing the first and second
offset areas.
Figure 124 is a plan view from below the outer structure of Figure 123.
Figure 125 is a side elevational view of an outer structure according to one aspect
of the present teachings.
Figure 126 is a perspective view of top side of an inner structure according to one
aspect of the present teachings.
Figure 127 is a perspective view of bottom side of the inner structure of Figure 126.
Figure 128 is a plan view from the top side of the inner structure of Figures 126-127.
Figure 129 is a plan view from the bottom side of the inner structure of Figures 126-128.
Figure 130 is an end-on elevational view of the inner structure of Figures 126-129
as viewed from its hinge (first) end.
Figure 131 is an end-on elevational view of the inner structure of Figures 126-130
as viewed from its latch (second) end.
Figure 1 32 is a perspective view of the modified rocker assembly of Figures 118-122
as it would appear installed in a cylinder head.
Figure 133 is a perspective view from another viewpoint of the modified rocker assembly
400 of Figures 118-122, as it would appear installed in a cylinder head.
Figure 134 shows the bottom of a partially assembled switching rocker arm and the
outer arm mating surface.
Figure 135 shows the rocker assembly of Figure 1 with a carbide pin in the latch recess
just before the pin is pressed into the mating surface.
Figure 136 shows a fixture for forming the indentation in the mating surface.
Figure 137 shows a press setup for pressing a pin into the mating surface.
Figure 138 shows a portion of only the outer arm illustrating the indentation in the
latch seat.
Figure 139 is a plan view of a conventional four cylinder in-line engine with its
valve cover removed for clarity.
Figure 140 is a plan view of an embodiment of a modified four cylinder engine according
to one embodiment of the teachings of the present application.
Figure 141 is an elevational cross-sectional view of the head of the embodiment shown
in Figure 140.
Figure 142 is a plan view of an embodiment of a modified four cylinder engine according
to the teachings of the present application.
Figure 143 is a plan view of a cylinder head of another conventional four cylinder
in-line engine.
Figure 144 is a side elevational view and a plan view from below a switching roller
finger follower cylinder deactivation (CDA) rocker arm assembly.
Figure 145 is a plan view of the cylinder head of Figure 143 with CDA rocker arm assemblies
installed on both end cylinders.
Figure 146 is a plan view of the cylinder head of Figure 143 with CDA rocker arm assemblies
installed on both middle cylinders.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0060] The terms used herein have their common and ordinary meanings unless redefined in
this specification, in which case the new definitions will supersede the common meanings.
[0061] It is also to be appreciated that the phraseology and terminology used herein is
for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. References
in the singular or plural form are not intended to limit the presently disclosed systems
or methods, their components, acts, or elements. The use herein of "including", "comprising",
"having", "containing", "involving" and variations thereof are meant to encompass
the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. References
to "or" may be construed as inclusive so that any terms described using "or" may indicate
any of a single, more than one, and all of the described terms. Any references to
"front and back", "left and right", "top and bottom", and "upper and lower" are intended
for convenience of description, not to limit the present systems and methods or their
components to any one positional or spatial orientation. Also the terms "coining",
"impression", and "indenting" are synonymous. Reference is also made to the "carbide
pin" or "carbide rod" which are also synonymous.
[0062] As illustrated in the various figures, some sizes of structures or portions are exaggerated
relative to other structures or portions for illustrative purposes and, thus, are
provided to illustrate the general structures of the present subject matter. Furthermore,
various aspects of the present subject matter are described with reference to a structure
or a portion being formed on other structures, portions, or both. As will be appreciated
by those of skill in the art, references to a structure being formed "on" or "above"
another structure or portion contemplates that additional structure, portion, or both
may intervene. References to a structure or a portion being formed "on" another structure
or portion without an intervening structure or portion are described herein as being
formed "directly on" the structure or portion. Similarly, it will be understood that
when an element is referred to as being "connected", "attached", or "coupled" to another
element, it can be directly connected, attached, or coupled to the other element,
or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to
as being "directly connected", "directly attached", or "directly coupled" to another
element, no intervening elements are present.
[0063] Furthermore, relative terms such as "on", "above", "upper", "top", "lower", or "bottom"
are used herein to describe one structure's or portion's relationship to another structure
or portion as illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that relative terms
such as "on", "above", "upper", "top", "lower" or "bottom" are intended to encompass
different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the
figures. For example, if the device in the figures is turned over, structure or portion
described as "above" other structures or portions would now be oriented "below" the
other structures or portions. Likewise, if devices in the figures are rotated along
an axis, structure or portion described as "above", other structures or portions would
now be oriented "next to" or "left of' the other structures or portions. Like numbers
refer to like elements throughout.
[0064] VVA SYSTEM EMBODIMENTS - VVA system embodiments represent a unique combination of
a switching device, actuation method, analysis and control system, and enabling technology
that together produce a VVA system. VVA system embodiments may incorporate one or
more enabling technologies.
1. DISCRETE VARIABLE VALVE LIFT (DVVL) SYSTEM EMBODIMENT DESCRIPTION
1. DVVL SYSTEM OVERVIEW
[0065] A cam-driven, discrete variable valve lift (DVVL), switching rocker arm device that
is hydraulically actuated using a combination of dual-feed hydraulic lash adjusters
(DFHLA), and oil control valves (OCV) is described in following sections as it would
be installed on an intake valve in a Type II valve train. In alternate embodiments,
this arrangement can be applied to any combination of intake or exhaust valves on
a piston-driven internal combustion engine.
[0066] As illustrated in Figure 2, the exhaust valve train in this embodiment comprises
a fixed rocker arm 810, single lobe camshaft 811, a standard hydraulic lash adjuster
(HLA) 812, and an exhaust valve 813. As shown in Figures 2 and 3, components of the
intake valve train include the three-lobe camshaft 102, switching rocker arm assembly
100, a dual feed hydraulic lash adjuster (DFHLA) 110 with an upper fluid port 506
and a lower fluid port 512, and an electro-hydraulic solenoid oil control valve assembly
(OCV) 820. The OCV 820 has an inlet port 821, and a first and second control port
822, 823 respectively.
[0067] Referring to Figure 2, the intake and exhaust valve trains share certain common geometries
including valve 813 spacing to HLA 812 and valve 112 spacing to DFHLA 110. Maintaining
a common geometry allows the DVVL system to package with existing or lightly modified
Type II cylinder head space while utilizing the standard chain drive system. Additional
components, illustrated in Figure 4, that are common to both the intake and exhaust
valve train include valves 112, valve springs 114, and valve spring retainers 116.
Valve keys and valve stem seals (not shown) are also common for both the intake and
exhaust. Implementation cost for the DVVL system is minimized by maintaining common
geometries, using common components.
[0068] The intake valve train elements illustrated in Figure 3 work in concert to open the
intake valve 112 with either high-lift camshaft lobes 104, 106 or a low-lift camshaft
lobe 108. The high-lift camshaft lobes 104, 106 are designed to provide performance
comparable to a fixed intake valve train, and are comprised of a generally circular
portion where no lift occurs, a lift portion, which may include a linear lift transition
portion, and a nose portion that corresponds to maximum lift. The low-lift camshaft
lobe 108 allows for lower valve lift and early intake valve closing. The low-lift
camshaft lobe 108 also comprises a generally circular portion where no lift occurs,
a generally linear portion were lift transitions, and a nose portion that corresponds
to maximum lift. The graph in Figure 5 shows a plot of valve lift 818 versus crank
angle 817. The cam shaft high-lift profile 814 and the fixed exhaust valve lift profile
815 are contrasted with low-lift profile 816. The low-lift event illustrated by profile
816 reduces both lift and duration of the intake event during part throttle operation
to decrease throttling losses and realize a fuel economy improvement. This is also
referred to as early intake valve closing, or EIVC. When full power operation is needed,
the DVVL system returns to the high-lift profile 814, which is similar to a standard
fixed lift event. Transitioning from low-lift to high-lift and vice versa occurs within
one camshaft revolution. The exhaust lift event shown by profile 815 is fixed and
operates in the same way with either a low-lift or high-lift intake event.
[0069] The system used to control DVVL switching uses hydraulic actuation. A schematic depiction
of a hydraulic control and actuation system 800 that is used with embodiments of the
teachings of the present application is shown in Figure 6. The hydraulic control and
actuation system 800 is designed to deliver hydraulic fluid, as commanded by controlled
logic, to mechanical latch assemblies that provide for switching between high-lift
and low-lift states. An engine control unit 825 controls when the mechanical switching
process is initiated. The hydraulic control and actuation system 800 shown is for
use in a four cylinder in-line Type II engine on the intake valve train described
previously, though the skilled artisan will appreciate that control and actuation
system may apply to engines of other "Types" and different numbers of cylinders.
[0070] Several enabling technologies previously mentioned and used in the DVVL system described
herein may be used in combination with other DVVL system components described herein
thus rending unique combinations, some of which will be described herein:
2. DVVL SYSTEM ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES
[0071] Several technologies used in this system have multiple uses in varied applications;
they are described herein as components of the DVVL system disclosed herein. These
include:
2.1. OIL CONTROL VALVE (OCV) AND OIL CONTROL VALVE ASSEMBLIES
[0072] Now, referring to Figures 7-9, an OCV is a control device that directs or does not
direct pressurized hydraulic fluid to cause the rocker arm 100 to switch between high-lift
mode and low-lift mode. OCV activation and deactivation is caused by a control device
signal 866. One or more OCVs can be packaged in a single module to form an assembly.
In one embodiment, OCV assembly 820 is comprised of two solenoid type OCV's packaged
together. In this embodiment, a control device provides a signal 866 to the OCV assembly
820, causing it to provide a high pressure (in embodiments, at least 2 Bar of oil
pressure) or low pressure (in embodiments, 0.2 - 0.4 Bar) oil to the oil control galleries
802, 803 causing the switching rocker arm 100 to be in either low-lift or high-lift
mode, as illustrated in Figures 8 and 9 respectively. Further description of this
OCV assembly 820 embodiment is contained in following sections.
2.2. DUAL FEED HYDRAULIC LASH ADJUSTER (DFHLA):
[0073] Many hydraulic lash adjusting devices exist for maintaining lash in engines. For
DVVL switching of rocker arm 100 (Figure 4), traditional lash management is required,
but traditional HLA devices are insufficient to provide the necessary oil flow requirements
for switching, withstand the associated side-loading applied by the assembly 100 during
operation, and fit into restricted package spaces. A compact dual feed hydraulic lash
adjuster 110 (DFHLA), used together with a switching rocker arm 100 is described,
with a set of parameters and geometry designed to provide optimized oil flow pressure
with low consumption, and a set of parameters and geometry designed to manage side
loading.
[0074] As illustrated in Figure 10, the ball plunger end 601 fits into the ball socket 502
that allows rotational freedom of movement in all directions. This permits side and
possibly asymmetrical loading of the ball plunger end 601 in certain operating modes,
for example when switching from high-lift to low-lift and vice versa. In contrast
to typical ball end plungers for HLA devices, the DFHLA 110 ball end plunger 601 is
constructed with thicker material to resist side loading, shown in Figure 11 as plunger
thickness 510.
[0075] Selected materials for the ball plunger end 601 may also have higher allowable kinetic
stress loads, for example, chrome vanadium alloy.
[0076] Hydraulic flow pathways in the DFHLA 110 are designed for high flow and low pressure
drop to ensure consistent hydraulic switching and reduced pumping losses. The DFHLA
is installed in the engine in a cylindrical receiving socket sized to seal against
exterior surface 511, illustrated in Figure 11. The cylindrical receiving socket combines
with the first oil flow channel 504 to form a closed fluid pathway with a specified
cross-sectional area.
[0077] As shown in Figure 11, the preferred embodiment includes four oil flow ports 506
(only two shown) as they are arranged in an equally spaced fashion around the base
of the first oil flow channel 504. Additionally, two second oil flow channels 508
are arranged in an equally spaced fashion around ball end plunger 601, and are in
fluid communication with the first oil flow channel 504 through oil ports 506. Oil
flow ports 506 and the first oil flow channel 504 are sized with a specific area and
spaced around the DFHLA 110 body to ensure even flow of oil and minimized pressure
drop from the first flow channel 504 to the third oil flow channel 509. The third
oil flow channel 509 is sized for the combined oil flow from the multiple second oil
flow channels 508.
2.3. DIAMOND-LIKE CARBON COATING (DLCC)
[0078] A diamond-like carbon coating (DLC) coating is described that can reduce friction
between treated parts, and at the same provide necessary wear and loading characteristics.
Similar coating materials and processes exist, none are sufficient to meet many of
the requirements encountered when used with VVA systems. For example, 1) be of sufficient
hardness, 2) have suitable loadbearing capacity, 3) be chemically stable in the operating
environment, 4) be applied in a process where temperatures do not exceed part annealing
temperatures, 5) meet engine lifetime requirements, and 6) offer reduced friction
as compared to a steel on steel interface.
[0079] A unique DLC coating process is described that meets the requirements set forth above.
The DLC coating that was selected is derived from a hydrogenated amorphous carbon
or similar material. The DLC coating is comprised of several layers described in Figure
12.
- 1. The first layer is a chrome adhesion layer 701 that acts as a bonding agent between
the metal receiving surface 700 and the next layer 702.
- 2. The second layer 702 is chrome nitride that adds ductility to the interface between
the base metal receiving surface 700 and the DLC coating.
- 3. The third layer 703 is a combination of chrome carbide and hydrogenated amorphous
carbon which bonds the DLC coating to the chrome nitride layer 702.
- 4. The fourth layer 704 is comprised of hydrogenated amorphous carbon that provides
the hard functional wear interface.
[0080] The combined thickness of layers 701-704 is between two and six micrometers. The
DLC coating cannot be applied directly to the metal receiving surface 700. To meet
durability requirements and for proper adhesion of the first chrome adhesion layer
701 with the base receiving surface 700, a very specific surface finish mechanically
applied to the base layer receiving surface 700.
2.4 SENSING AND MEASUREMENT
[0081] Information gathered using sensors may be used to verify switching modes, identify
error conditions, or provide information analyzed and used for switching logic and
timing. Several sensing devices that may be used are described below.
2.4.1 DUAL FEED HYDRAULIC LASH ADJUSTER (DFHLA) MOVEMENT
[0082] Variable valve actuation (VVA) technologies are designed to change valve lift profiles
during engine operation using switching devices, for example a DVVL switching rocker
arm or cylinder deactivation (CDA) rocker arm. When employing these devices, the status
of valve lift is important information that confirms a successful switching operation,
or detects an error condition/ malfunction.
[0083] A DFHLA is used to both manage lash and supply hydraulic fluid for switching in VVA
systems that employ switching rocker arm assemblies such as CDA or DVVL. As shown
in the section view of Figure 10, normal lash adjustment for the DVVL rocker arm assembly
100, (a detailed description is in following sections) causes the ball plunger 601
to maintain contact with the inner arm 122 receiving socket during both high-lift
and low-lift operation. The ball plunger 601 is designed to move as necessary when
loads vary from between high-lift and low-lift states. A measurement of the movement
514 of Figure 13 in comparison with known states of operation can determine the latch
location status. In one embodiment, a non-contact switch 513 is located between the
HLA outer body and the ball plunger cylindrical body. A second example may incorporate
a Hall-effect sensor mounted in a way that allows measurement of the changes in magnetic
fields generated by a certain movement 514.
2.4.2 VALVE STEM MOVEMENT
[0084] Variable valve actuation (VVA) technologies are designed to change valve lift profiles
during engine operation using switching devices, for example a DVVL switching rocker
arm. The status of valve lift is important information that confirms a successful
switching operation, or detects an error condition/ malfunction. Valve stem position
and relative movement sensors can be used to for this function.
[0085] One embodiment to monitor the state of VVA switching, and to determine if there is
a switching malfunction is illustrated in Figure 14 and 14A. In accordance with one
aspect of the present teachings, a linear variable differential transformer (LVDT)
type of transducer can convert the rectilinear motion of valve 872, to which it is
coupled mechanically, into a corresponding electrical signal. LVDT linear position
sensors are readily available that can measure movements as small as a few millionths
of an inch up to several inches.
[0086] Figure 14A shows the components of a typical LVDT installed in a valve stem guide
871. The LVDT internal structure consists of a primary winding 899 centered between
a pair of identically wound secondary windings 897, 898. In embodiments, the windings
897, 898, 899 are wound in a recessed hollow formed in the valve guide body 871 that
is bounded by a thin-walled section 878, a first end wall 895, and a second end wall
896. In this embodiment, the valve guide body 871 is stationary.
[0087] Now, as to figures 14, 14A, and 14B, the moving element of this LVDT arrangement
is a separate tubular armature of magnetically permeable material called the core
873. In embodiments, the core 873 is fabricated into the valve 872 stem using any
suitable method and manufacturing material, for example iron.
[0088] The core 873 is free to move axially inside the primary winding 899, and secondary
windings 897, 898, and it is mechanically coupled to the valve 872, whose position
is being measured. There is no physical contact between the core 873, and valve guide
871 inside bore.
[0089] In operation, the LVDT's primary winding, 899, is energized by applying an alternating
current of appropriate amplitude and frequency, known as the primary excitation. The
magnetic flux thus developed is coupled by the core 873 to the adjacent secondary
windings, 897 and 898.
[0090] As shown in 14A, if the core 873 is located midway between the secondary windings
897, 898, an equal magnetic flux is then coupled to each secondary winding, making
the respective voltages induced in windings 897 and 898 equal. At this reference midway
core 873 position, known as the null point, the differential voltage output is essentially
zero.
[0091] The core 873 is arranged so that it extends past both ends of winding 899. As shown
in Figure 14B, if the core 873 is moved a distance 870 to make it closer to winding
897 than to winding 898, more magnetic flux is coupled to winding 897 and less to
winding 898, resulting in a non-zero differential voltage. Measuring the differential
voltages in this manner can indicate both direction of movement and position of the
valve 872.
[0092] In a second embodiment, illustrated in Figures 14C and 14D, the LVDT arrangement
described above is modified by removing the second coil 898 in (Figure 14A). When
coil 898 is removed, the voltage induced in coil 897 will vary relative to the end
position 874 of the core 873. In embodiments where the direction and timing of movement
of the valve 872 is known, only one secondary coil 897 is necessary to measure magnitude
of movement. As noted above, the core 873 portion of the valve can be located and
fabricated using several methods. For example, a weld at the end position 874 can
join nickel base non-core material and iron base core material, a physical reduction
in diameter can be used to locate end position 874 to vary magnetic flux in a specific
location, or a slug of iron- based material can be inserted and located at the end
position 874.
[0093] It will be appreciated in light of the disclosure that the LVDT sensor components
in one example can be located near the top of the valve guide 871 to allow for temperature
dissipation below that point. While such a location can be above typical weld points
used in valve stem fabrication, the weld could be moved or as noted. The location
of the core 873 relative to the secondary winding 897 is proportional to how much
voltage is induced.
[0094] The use of an LVDT sensor as described above in an operating engine has several advantages,
including 1) Frictionless operation - in normal use, there is no mechanical contact
between the LVDT's core 873 and coil assembly. No friction also results in long mechanical
life. 2) Nearly infinite resolution - since an LVDT operates on electromagnetic coupling
principles in a friction-free structure, it can measure infinitesimally small changes
in core position, limited only by the noise in an LVDT signal conditioner and the
output display's resolution. This characteristic also leads to outstanding repeatability,
3) Environmental robustness - materials and construction techniques used in assembling
an LVDT result in a rugged, durable sensor that is robust to a variety of environmental
conditions. Bonding of the windings 897, 898, 899 may be followed by epoxy encapsulation
into the valve guide body 871, resulting in superior moisture and humidity resistance,
as well as the capability to take substantial shock loads and high vibration levels.
Additionally, the coil assembly can be hermetically sealed to resist oil and corrosive
environments. 4) Null point repeatability - the location of an LVDT's null point,
described previously, is very stable and repeatable, even over its very wide operating
temperature range. 5) Fast dynamic response - the absence of friction during ordinary
operation permits an LVDT to respond very quickly to changes in core position. The
dynamic response of an LVDT sensor is limited only by small inertial effects due to
the core assembly mass. In most cases, the response of an LVDT sensing system is determined
by characteristics of the signal conditioner. 6) Absolute output - an LVDT is an absolute
output device, as opposed to an incremental output device. This means that in the
event of loss of power, the position data being sent from the LVDT will not be lost.
When the measuring system is restarted, the LVDT's output value will be the same as
it was before the power failure occurred.
[0095] The valve stem position sensor described above employs a LVDT type transducer to
determine the location of the valve stem during operation of the engine. The sensor
may be any known sensor technology including Hall-effect sensor, electronic, optical
and mechanical sensors that can track the position of the valve stem and report the
monitored position back to the ECU.
2.4.3 PART POSITION/MOVEMENT
[0096] Variable valve actuation (VVA) technologies are designed to change valve lift profiles
during engine operation using switching devices, for example a DVVL switching rocker
arm. Changes in switching state may also change the position of component parts in
VVA assemblies, either in absolute terms or relative to one another in the assembly.
Position change measurements can be designed and implemented to monitor the state
of VVA switching, and possibly determine if there is a switching malfunction.
[0097] Now, with reference to Figures 15-16, an exemplary DVVL switching rocker arm assembly
100 can be configured with an accurate non-contacting sensor 828 that measures relative
movement, motion, or distance.
[0098] In one embodiment, movement sensor 828 is located near the first end 101 (Figure
15), to evaluate the movement of the outer arm 120 relative to known positions for
high-lift and low-lift modes. In this example, movement sensor 828 comprises a wire
wound around a permanently magnetized core, and is located and oriented to detect
movement by measuring changes in magnetic flux produced as a ferrous material passes
through its known magnetic field. For example, when the outer arm tie bar 875, which
is magnetic (ferrous material), passes through the permanent magnetic field of the
position sensor 828, the flux density is modulated, inducing AC voltages in the coil
and producing an electrical output that is proportional to the proximity of the tie
bar 875. The modulating voltage is input to the engine control unit (ECU) (described
in following sections), where a processor employs logic and calculations to initiate
rocker arm assembly 100 switching operations. In embodiments, the voltage output may
be binary, meaning that the absence or presence of a voltage signal indicates high-lift
or low-lift.
[0099] It can be seen that position sensor 828 may be positioned to measure movement of
other parts in the rocker arm assembly 100. In a second embodiment, sensor 828 may
be positioned at second end 103 of the DVVL rocker arm assembly 100 (Figure 15) to
evaluate the location of the inner arm 122 relative to the outer arm 120.
[0100] A third embodiment can position sensor 828 to directly evaluate the latch 200 position
in the DVVL rocker arm assembly 100. The latch 200 and sensor 828 are engaged and
fixed relative to each other when they are in the latched state (high lift mode),
and move apart for unlatched (low-lift) operation.
[0101] Movement may also be detected using and inductive sensor. Sensor 877 may be a Hall-effect
sensor, mounted in a way that allows measurement of the movement or lack of movement,
for example the valve stem 112.
2.4.4 PRESSURE CHARACTERIZATION
[0102] Variable valve actuation (VVA) technologies are designed to change valve lift profiles
during engine operation using switching devices, for example a DVVL switching rocker
arm. Because latch status is an important input to the ECU that may enable it to perform
various functions, such as regulating fuel/air mixture to increase gas mileage, reduce
pollution, or to regulate idle and knocking, measuring devices or systems that confirm
a successful switching operation, or detect an error condition or malfunction are
necessary for proper control. In some cases switching status reporting and error notification
is necessary for regulatory compliance.
[0103] In embodiments comprising a hydraulically actuated DVVL system 800, as illustrated
in Figure 6, changes in switching state provide distinct hydraulic switching fluid
pressure signatures. Because fluid pressure is required to produce the necessary hydraulic
stiffness that initiates switching, and because hydraulic fluid pathways are geometrically
defined with specific channels and chambers, a characteristic pressure signature is
produced that can be used to predictably determine latched or unlatched status or
a switching malfunction. Several embodiments can be described that measure pressure,
and compare measured results with known and acceptable operating parameters. Pressure
measurements can be analyzed on a macro level by examining fluid pressure over several
switching cycles, or evaluated over a single switching event lasting milliseconds.
[0104] Now, with reference to Figures 6, 7, and 17, an example plot (Figure 17) shows the
valve lift height variation 882 over time for cylinder 1 as the switching rocker assembly
100 operates in either high-lift or low-lift, and switches between high-lift and low-lift.
Corresponding data for the hydraulic switching system are plotted on the same time
scale (Figure 17), including oil pressure 880 in the upper galleries 802, 803 as measured
using pressure transducer 890, and the electrical current 881 used to open and close
solenoid valves 822, 823 in the OCV assembly 820. As can be seen, this level of analysis
on a macro level clearly shows the correlation between OCV switching current 881,
control pressure 880, and lift 882 during all states of operation. For example, at
time 0.1, the OCV is commanded to switch, as shown by an increased electrical current
881. When the OCV is switched, increased control pressure 880 results in a high-lift
to low-lift switching event. As operation is evaluated over one or more complete switching
cycles, proper operation of the sub-system comprising the OCV and the pressurized
fluid delivery system to the rocker arm assembly 100 can be evaluated. Switching malfunction
determination can be enhanced with other independent measurements, for example valve
stem movement as described above. As can be seen, these analyses can be performed
for any number of OCV's used to control intake and/or exhaust valves for one or more
cylinders.
[0105] Using a similar method, but using data measured and analyzed on the microsecond level
during a switching event, provides enough detailed control pressure information (Figures
17A, 17B) to independently evaluate a successful switching event or switching malfunction
without measuring valve lift or latch pin movement directly. In embodiments using
this method, switching state is determined by comparing the measured pressure transient
to known operating state pressure transients developed during testing, and stored
in the ECU for analysis. Figures 17A and 17B illustrate exemplary test data used to
produce known operating pressure transients for a switching rocker arm in a DVVL system.
[0106] The test system included four switching rocker arm assemblies 100 as shown in (Figure3),
an OCV assembly 820 (Figure 3), two upper oil control galleries 802, 803 (Figures
6-7), and a closed loop system to control hydraulic actuating fluid temperature and
pressure in the control galleries 802, 803. Each control gallery provided hydraulic
fluid at regulated pressure to control two rocker arm assemblies 100. Figure 17A illustrates
a valid single test run showing data when an OCV solenoid valve is energized to initiate
switching from high-lift to low-lift state. Instrumentation was installed to measure
latch movements 1003, pressure 880 in the control galleries 802, 803, OCV current
881, pressure 1001 in the hydraulic fluid supply 804 (Figure 6-7), and latch lash
and cam lash. The sequence of events can be described as follows:
- 0 ms - ECU switched on electrical current 881 to energize the OCV solenoid valve
- 10 ms - Switching current 881 to the OCV solenoid is sufficient to regulate pressure
higher in the control gallery 802, 803 as shown by pressure curve 880.
- 10-13 ms - The supply pressure curve 1001 decreases below the pressure regulated by
the OCV as hydraulic fluid flows from the supply 804 (Figs 6-7) into the upper control
galleries 802, 803. In response, pressure 880 increases rapidly in the control galleries
802, 803. Latch pin movement begins as shown in latch pin movement curve 1003.
- 13-15 ms - The supply pressure curve 1001 returns to a steady unregulated state as
flow stabilizes. Pressure 880 in the control galleries 802, 803 increases to the higher
pressure regulated by the OCV.
- 15-20 ms - A pressure 880 increase/decrease transient in the control galleries 802,
803 is produced as pressurized hydraulic fluid pushes the latch fully back into position
(latch pin movement curve 1002), and hydraulic flow and pressure stabilizes at the
OCV unregulated pressure. Pressure spike 1003 is characteristic of this transient.
- At 12 ms and 17 ms distinctive pressure transients can be seen in pressure curve 880
that coincide with sudden changes in latch position 1002.
[0107] Figure 17B illustrates a valid single test run showing data when an OCV solenoid
valve is de-energized to initiate switching from low-lift to high-lift state. The
sequence of events can be described as follows:
- 0 ms - ECU switched off electrical current 881 to de-energize the OCV solenoid valve
- 5 ms -OCV solenoid moves far enough to introduce regulated, lower pressure, hydraulic
fluid into enter the control galleries 802 and 803 (pressure curve 880).
- 5-7 ms - Pressure in the control galleries 802, 803, decreases rapidly as shown by
curve 880, as the OCV regulates pressure lower.
- 7-12 ms - Coinciding with the low pressure point 1005, lower pressure in the control
galleries 802, 803 initiates latch movement as shown by the latch movement curve 1002.
Pressure curve 880 transients are initiated as the latch spring 230 (Figure 19) compresses
and moves hydraulic fluid in the volume engaging the latch.
- 12-15 ms - Pressure transients, shown in pressure curve 880, are again introduced
as the latch pin movement, shown by latch pin movement curve 1002, completes.
- 15-30 ms - Pressure in control galleries 802, 803 stabilize at the OCV regulated pressure
as shown by pressure curve 880.
- As noted above, at 7-10 ms and 13-20 ms distinctive pressure transients can be seen
in pressure curve 880 that coincide with sudden changes in latch position 1002.
[0108] As noted previously, and in following sections, the fixed geometric configuration
of the hydraulic channels, holes, clearances, and chambers, and the stiffness of the
latch spring, are variables that relate to hydraulic response and mechanical switching
speed for changes in regulated hydraulic fluid pressure. The pressure curves 880,
in Figures 17A and 17B describe a DVVL switching rocker arm system operating in an
acceptable range. During operation, specific rates of increase or decrease in pressure
(curve slope) are characteristic of proper operation characterized by the timing of
events listed above. Examples of error conditions include: time shifting of pressure
events that show deterioration of latch response times, changes in rate of the occurrence
of events (pressure curve slope changes), or an overall decrease in the amplitude
of pressure events. For example, a lower than anticipated pressure increase in the
15-20 ms period indicates that the latch has not retracted completely, potentially
resulting in a critical shift.
[0109] The test data in these examples were measured with oil pressure of 50 psi and oil
temperature of 70 degrees C. A series of tests in different operating conditions can
provide a database of characteristic curves to be used by the ECU for switching diagnosis.
[0110] An additional embodiment that utilizes pressure measurement to diagnose switching
state is described. A DFHLA 110 as shown in Figure 3 is used to both manage lash,
and supply hydraulic fluid for actuating VVA systems that employ switching rocker
arm assemblies such as CDA or DVVL. As shown in the section view of Figure 52, normal
lash adjustment for the DVVL rocker arm assembly 100, causes the ball plunger 601
to maintain contact with the receiving socket of the inner arm assembly 622 during
both high-lift and low-lift operation. When fully assembled in an engine, the DFHLA
110 is in a fixed position, while the inner rocker arm assembly 622 exhibits rotational
movement about the ball tip contact point 611. The rotational movement of the inner
arm assembly 622 and the ball plunger load 615 vary in magnitude when switching between
high-lift and low-lift states. The ball plunger 601 is designed to move in compensation
when loads and movement vary.
[0111] Compensating force for the ball plunger load 615 is provided by hydraulic fluid pressure
in the lower control gallery 805 as it is communicated from the lower port 512 to
chamber 905 (Figure 11). As shown in Figures 6-7, hydraulic fluid at unregulated pressure
is communicated from the engine cylinder head, into the lower control gallery 805.
[0112] In embodiments, a pressure transducer is placed in the hydraulic gallery 805 that
feeds the lash adjuster part of the DFHLA 110. The pressure transducer can be used
to monitor the transient pressure change in the hydraulic gallery 805 that feeds the
lash adjuster when transitioning from the high-lift state to the low-lift state or
from the low-lift state to the high-lift state. By monitoring the pressure signature
when switching from one mode to another, the system may be able to detect when the
variable valve actuation system is malfunctioning at any one location. A pressure
signature curve, in embodiments plotted as pressure versus time in milliseconds, provides
a characteristic shape that can include amplitude, slope, and/or other parameters.
[0113] For example, Figure 17C shows a plot of intake valve lift profile curves 814, 816
versus time in milliseconds, superimposed with a plot of hydraulic gallery pressure
curves 1005, 1005 versus the same time scale. Pressure curve 1006 and valve lift profile
curve 816 correspond to the low-lift state, and pressure curve 1005 and valve lift
profile 814 correspond to the high-lift state.
[0114] During steady state operation, pressure signature curves 1005, 1006 exhibit cyclical
behavior, with distinct spikes 1007, 1008 caused as the DFHLA compensates for alternating
ball plunger loads 615 that are imparted as the cam pushes down the rocker arm assembly
to compress the valve spring (Figure 3) and provide valve lift, as the valve spring
extends to close the valve, and when the cam is on base circle where no lift occurs.
As shown in Figure 17C, transient pressure spikes 1006, 1007 correspond with the peak
of the low-lift and high-lift profiles 816, 814 respectively. As the hydraulic system
pressure stabilizes, steady-state pressure signature curves 1005, 1006 resume.
[0115] As noted previously, and in following sections, the fixed geometric configuration
of DFHLA hydraulic channels, holes, clearances, and chambers, are variables that relate
to hydraulic response and pressure transients for a given hydraulic fluid pressure
and temperature. The pressure signature curves 1005, 1006, in Figure 17C describe
a DVVL switching rocker arm system operating in an acceptable range. During operation,
certain rates of increase or decrease in pressure (curve slopes), peak pressure values,
and timing of peak pressures with respect to maximum lift are also be characteristic
of proper operation characterized by the timing of switching events. Examples of error
conditions may include time shifting of pressure events, changes in rate of the occurrence
of events (pressure curve slope changes), sudden unexpected pressure transients, or
an overall decrease in the amplitude of pressure events.
[0116] A series of tests in different operating conditions can provide a database of characteristic
curves to be used by the ECU for switching diagnosis. One or several values of pressure
can be used based on the system configuration and vehicle demands. The monitored pressure
trace can be compared to a standard trace to determine when the system malfunctions.
3. SWITCHING CONTROL AND LOGIC
3.1. ENGINE IMPLEMENTATION
[0117] The DVVL hydraulic fluid system that delivers engine oil at a controlled pressure
to the DVVL switching rocker arm 100, illustrated in Figure 4, is described in following
sections as it may be installed on an intake valve in a Type II valve train in a four
cylinder engine. In alternate embodiments, this hydraulic fluid delivery system can
be applied to any combination of intake or exhaust valves on a piston-driven internal
combustion engines.
3.2. HYDRAULIC FLUID DELIVERY SYSTEM TO THE ROCKER ARM ASSEMBLY
[0118] With reference to Figures 3, 6 and 7, the hydraulic fluid system delivers engine
oil 801 at a controlled pressure to the DVVL switching rocker arm 100 (Figure 4).
In this arrangement, engine oil from the cylinder head 801 that is not pressure regulated
feeds into the HLA lower feed gallery 805. As shown in Figure 3, this oil is always
in fluid communication with the lower feed inlet 512 of the DFHLA, where it is used
to perform normal hydraulic lash adjustment. Engine oil from the cylinder head 801
that is not pressure regulated is also supplied to the oil control valve assembly
inlet 821. As described previously, the OCV assembly 820 for this DVVL embodiment
comprises two independently actuated solenoid valves that regulate oil pressure from
the common inlet 821. Hydraulic fluid from the OCV assembly 820 first control port
outlet 822 is supplied to the first upper gallery 802, and hydraulic fluid from the
second control port 823 is supplied to the second upper gallery 803. The first OCV
determines the lift mode for cylinders one and two, and the second OCV determines
the lift mode for cylinders three and four. As shown in Figure 18 and described in
following sections, actuation of valves in the OCV assembly 820 is directed by the
engine control unit 825 using logic based on both sensed and stored information for
particular physical configuration, switching window, and set of operating conditions,
for example, a certain number of cylinders and a certain oil temperature. Pressure
regulated hydraulic fluid from the upper galleries 802, 803 is directed to the DFHLA
upper port 506, where it is transmitted through channel 509 to the switching rocker
arm assembly 100. As shown in Figure 19, hydraulic fluid is communicated through the
rocker arm assembly 100 via the first oil gallery 144, and the second oil gallery
146 to the latch pin assembly 201, where it is used to initiate switching between
high-lift and low-lift states.
[0119] Purging accumulated air in the upper galleries 802, 803 is important to maintain
hydraulic stiffness and minimize variation in the pressure rise time. Pressure rise
time directly affects the latch movement time during switching operations. The passive
air bleed ports 832, 833 shown in Figure 6 were added to the high points in the upper
galleries 802, 803 to vent accumulated air into the cylinder head air space under
the valve cover.
3.2.1 HYDRAULIC FLUID DELIVERY FOR LOW-LIFT MODE:
[0120] Now, with reference to Figure 8, the DVVL system is designed to operate from idle
to 3500 rpm in low-lift mode. A section view of the rocker arm assembly 100 and the
3-lobed cam 102 shows low-lift operation. Major components of the assembly shown in
Figures 8 and 19, include the inner arm 122, roller bearing 128, outer arm 120, slider
pads 130, 132, latch 200, latch spring 230, pivot axle 118, and lost motion torsion
springs 134, 136. For low-lift operation, when a solenoid valve in the OCV assembly
820 is energized, unregulated oil pressure at ≥ 2.0 Bar is supplied to the switching
rocker arm assembly 100 through the control galleries 802, 803 and the DFHLA 110.
The pressure causes the latch 200 to retract, unlocking the inner arm 122 and outer
arm 120, and allowing them to move independently. The high-lift camshaft lobes 104,
106 (Figure 3) remain in contact with the sliding interface pads 130, 132 on the outer
arm 120. The outer arm 120 rotates about the pivot axle 118 and does not impart any
motion to the valve 112. This is commonly referred to as lost motion. Since the low-lift
cam profile 816 (Figure 5) is designed for early valve closing, the switching rocker
arm 100 must be designed to absorb all of the motion from the high-lift camshaft lobes
104, 106 (Fig 3). Force from the lost motion torsion springs 134, 136 (Figure 15)
ensure the outer arm 120 stays in contact with the high-lift lobe 104, 106 (Figure
3). The low-lift lobe 108 (Figure 3) contacts the roller bearing 128 on the inner
arm 122 and the valve is opened per the low lift early valve closing profile 816 (Fig
5).
3.2.2 HYDRAULIC FLUID DELIVERY FOR HIGH-LIFT MODE
[0121] Now, with reference to Figure 9, The DVVL system is designed to operate from idle
to 7300 rpm in high-lift mode. A section view of the switching rocker arm 100 and
the 3-lobe cam 102 shows high-lift operation. Major components of the assembly are
shown in Figures 9 and 19, including the inner arm 122, roller bearing 128, outer
arm 120, slider pads 130, 132, latch 200, latch spring 230, pivot axle 118, and lost
motion torsion springs 134, 136.
[0122] Solenoid valves in the OCV assembly 820 are de-energized to enable high lift operation.
The latch spring 230 extends the latch 200, locking the inner arm 122 and outer arm
120. The locked arms function like a fixed rocker arm. The symmetric high lift lobes
104, 106 (Figure 3) contact the slider pads 130, (132 not shown) on the outer arm
120, rotating the inner arm 122 about the DFHLA 110 ball end 601 and opening the valve
112 (Figure 4) per the high lift profile 814 (Figure 5). During this time, regulated
oil pressure from 0.2 to 0.4 bar is supplied to the switching rocker arm 100 through
the control galleries 802, 803. Oil pressure maintained at 0.2 to 0.4 bar keeps the
oil passages full but does not retract the latch 200.
[0123] In high-lift mode, the dual feed function of the DFHLA is important to ensure proper
lash compensation of the valve train at maximum engine speeds. The lower gallery 805
in Figure 9 communicates cylinder head oil pressure to the lower DFHLA port 512 (Figure
11). The lower portion of the DFHLA is designed to perform as a normal hydraulic lash
compensation mechanism. The DFHLA 110 mechanism was designed to ensure the hydraulics
have sufficient pressure to avoid aeration and to remain full of oil at all engine
speeds. Hydraulic stiffness and proper valve train function are maintained with this
system.
[0124] The table in Figure 20 summarizes the pressure states in high-lift and low-lift modes.
Hydraulic separation of the DFHLA normal lash compensation function from the rocker
arm assembly switching function is also shown. The engine starts in high-lift mode
(latch extended and engaged), since this is the default mode.
3.3 OPERATING PARAMETERS
[0125] An important factor in operating a DVVL system is the reliable control of switching
from high-lift mode to low-lift mode. DVVL valve actuation systems can only be switched
between modes during a predetermined window of time. As described above, switching
from high lift mode to low lift mode and vice versa is initiated by a signal from
the engine control unit (ECU) 825 (Figure 18) using logic that analyzes stored information,
for example a switching window for particular physical configuration, stored operating
conditions, and processed data that is gathered by sensors. Switching window durations
are determined by the DVVL system physical configuration, including the number of
cylinders, the number of cylinders controlled by a single OCV, the valve lift duration,
engine speed, and the latch response times inherent in the hydraulic control and mechanical
system.
3.3.1 GATHERED DATA
[0126] Real-time sensor information includes input from any number of sensors, as illustrated
in the exemplary DVVL system 800 illustrated in Figure 6. Sensors may include 1) valve
stem movement 829, as measured in one embodiment using the linear variable differential
transformer (LVDT) described previously, 2) motion/position 828 and latch position
827 using a Hall-effect sensor or motion detector, 3) DFHLA movement 826 using a proximity
switch, Hall effect sensor, or other means, 4) oil pressure 830, and 5) oil temperature
890. Cam shaft rotary position and speed may be gathered directly or inferred from
the engine speed sensor.
[0127] In a hydraulically actuated VVA system, the oil temperature affects the stiffness
of the hydraulic system used for switching in systems such as CDA and VVL. If the
oil is too cold, its viscosity slows switching time, causing a malfunction. This relationship
is illustrated for an exemplary DVVL switching rocker arm system, in Figures 21-22.
An accurate oil temperature, taken with a sensor 890 shown in Figure 6, located near
the point of use rather than in the engine oil crankcase, provides the most accurate
information. In one example, the oil temperature in a VVA system, monitored close
to the oil control valves (OCV), must be greater than or equal to 20 degrees C to
initiate low-lift (unlatched) operation with the required hydraulic stiffness. Measurements
can be taken with any number of commercially available components, for example a thermocouple.
The oil control valves are described further in published US Patent Applications
US2010/0089347 published April 15, 2010 and
US2010/0018482 published Jan. 28, 2010.
[0128] Sensor information is sent to the Engine Control Unit (ECU) 825 as a real-time operating
parameter (Figure 18).
3.3.2 STORED INFORMATION
3.3.2.1 SWITCHING WINDOW ALGORITHMS
Mechanical Switching Window:
[0129] The shape of each lobe of the three-lobed cam illustrated in Figure 4 comprises a
base circle portion 605, 607, 609, where no lift occurs, a transition portion that
is used to take up mechanical clearances prior to a lift event, and a lift portion
that moves the valve 112. For the exemplary DVVL switching rocker arm 100, installed
in system 800 (Figure 6), switching between high-lift and low-lift modes can only
occur during base circle operation when there is no load on the latch that prevents
it from moving. Further descriptions of this mechanism are provided in following sections.
The no-lift portion 863 of base circle operation is shown graphically in Figure 5.
The DVVL system 800, switches within a single camshaft revolution at speeds up to
3500 engine rpm at oil temperatures of 20°C and above. Switching outside of the timing
window or prescribed oil conditions may result in a critical shift event, which is
a shift in engine valve position during a point in the engine cycle when loading on
the valve actuator switching component or on the engine valve is higher than the structure
is designed to accommodate while switching. A critical shift event may result in damage
to the valve train and/or other engine parts. The switching window can be further
defined as the duration in cam shaft crank degrees needed to change the pressure in
the control gallery and move the latch from the extended to retracted position and
vice versa.
[0130] As previously described and shown in Figure 7, the DVVL system has a single OCV assembly
820 that contains two independently controlled solenoid valves. The first valve controls
the first upper gallery 802 pressure and determines the lift mode for cylinders one
and two. The second valve controls the second upper gallery 803 pressure and determines
the lift mode for cylinders three and four. Figure 23 illustrates the intake valve
timing (lift sequence) for this OCV assembly 820 (Figure 3) configuration relative
to crankshaft angle for an in-line four cylinder engine with a cylinder firing order
of (2-1-3-4). The high-lift intake valve profiles for cylinder two 851, cylinder one
852, cylinder three 853, and cylinder four 854, are shown at the top of the illustration
as lift plotted versus crank angle. Valve lift duration for the corresponding cylinders
are plotted in the lower section as lift duration regions 855, 856, 857, and 858 lift
versus crank angle. No lift base circle operating regions 863 for individual cylinders
are also shown. A prescribed switching window must be determined to move the latch
within one camshaft revolution, with the stipulation that each OCV is configured to
control two cylinders at once.
[0131] The mechanical switching window can be optimized by understanding and improving latch
movement. Now, with reference to Figures 24-25, the mechanical configuration of the
switching rocker arm assembly 100 provides two distinct conditions that allow the
effective switching window to be increased. The first, called a high-lift latch restriction,
occurs in high-lift mode when the latch 200 is locked in place by the load being applied
to open the valve 112. The second, called a low-lift latch restriction, occurs in
the unlatched low-lift mode when the outer arm 120 blocks the latch 200 from extending
under the outer arm 120. These conditions are described as follows:
High-Lift Latch Restriction:
[0132] Figure 24 shows high-lift event where the latch 200 is engaged with the outer arm
120. As the valve is opened against the force supplied by valve spring 114, the latch
200 transfers the force from the inner arm 122 to the outer arm 120. When the spring
114 force is transferred by the latch 200, the latch 200 becomes locked in its extended
position. In this condition, hydraulic pressure applied by switching the OCV while
attempting to switch from high-lift to low-lift mode is insufficient to overcome the
force locking the latch 200, preventing it from being retracted. This condition extends
the total switching window by allowing pressure application prior to the end of the
high-lift event and the onset of base circle 863 (Figure 23) operation that unloads
the latch 200. When the force is released on the latch 200, a switching event can
commence immediately.
Low-Lift Latch Restriction:
[0133] Figure 25 shows low lift operation where the latch 200 is retracted in low-lift mode.
During the lift portion of the event, the outer arm 120 blocks the latch 200, preventing
its extension, even if the OCV is switched, and hydraulic fluid pressure is lowered
to return to the high-lift latched state. This condition extends the total switching
window by allowing hydraulic pressure release prior to the end of the high-lift event
and the onset of base circle 863 (Figure 23). Once base circle is reached, the latch
spring 230 can extend the latch 200. The total switching window is increased by allowing
pressure relief prior to base circle. When the camshaft rotates to base circle, switching
can commence immediately.
[0134] Figure 26 illustrates the same information shown in Figure 23, but is also overlaid
with the time required to complete each step of the mechanical switching process during
the transition between high-lift and low-lift states. These steps represent elements
of mechanical switching that are inherent in the design of the switching rocker arm
assembly. As described for Figure 23, the firing order of the engine is shown at the
top corresponding to the crank angle degrees referenced to cylinder two along with
the intake valve profiles 851, 852, 853, 854. The latch 200 must be moved while the
intake cam lobes are on base circle 863 (referred to as the mechanical switching window).
Since each solenoid valve in an OCV assembly 820 controls two cylinders, the switching
window must be timed to accommodate both cylinders while on their respective base
circles. Cylinder two returns to base circle at 285 degrees crank angle. Latch movement
must be complete by 690 crank angle degrees prior to the next lift event for cylinder
two. Similarly, cylinder one returns to base circle at 465 degrees and must complete
switching by 150 degrees. As can be seen, the switching window for cylinders one and
two is slightly different. As can be seen, the first OCV electrical trigger starts
switching prior to the cylinder one intake lift event and the second OCV electrical
trigger starts prior to the cylinder four intake lift event.
[0135] A worst case analysis was performed to define the switching times in Figure 26 at
the maximum switching speed of 3500 rpm. Note that the engine may operate at much
higher speeds of 7300 rpm; however, mode switching is not allowed above 3500 rpm.
The total switching window for cylinder two is 26 milliseconds, and is broken into
two parts: a 7 millisecond high-lift/ low-lift latch restriction time 861, and a 19
millisecond mechanical switching time 864. A 10 millisecond mechanical response time
862 is consistent for all cylinders. The 15 millisecond latch restricted time 861
is longer for cylinder one because OCV switching is initiated while cylinder one is
on an intake lift event, and the latch is restricted from moving.
[0136] Several mechanical and hydraulic constraints that must be accommodated to meet the
total switching window. First, a critical shift 860, caused by switching that is not
complete prior to the beginning of the next intake lift event must be avoided. Second,
experimental data shows that the maximum switching time to move the latch at the lowest
allowable engine oil temperature of 20°C is 10 milliseconds. As noted in Figure 26,
there are 19 milliseconds available for mechanical switching 864 on the base circle.
Because all test data shows that the switching mechanical response 862 will occur
in the first 10 milliseconds, the full 19 milliseconds of mechanical switching time
864 is not required. The combination of mechanical and hydraulic constraints defines
a worst-case switching time of 17 milliseconds that includes latch restricted time
861 plus latch mechanical response time 862.
[0137] The DVVL switching rocker arm system was designed with margin to accomplish switching
with a 9 millisecond margin. Further, the 9 millisecond margin may allow mode switching
at speeds above 3500 rpm. Cylinders three and four correspond to the same switching
times as one and two with different phasing as shown in Figure 26. Electrical switching
time required to activate the solenoid valves in the OCV assembly is not accounted
for in this analysis, although the ECU can easily be calibrated to consider this variable
because the time from energizing the OCV until control gallery oil pressure begins
to change remains predictable.
[0138] Now, as to Figures 4 and 25A, a critical shift may occur if the timing of the cam
shaft rotation and the latch 200 movement coincide to load the latch 200 on one edge,
where it only partially engages on the outer arm 120. Once the high-lift event begins,
the latch 200 can slip and disengage from the outer arm 120. When this occurs, the
inner arm 122, accelerated by valve spring 114 forces, causes an impact between the
roller bearing 128 and the low-lift cam lobe 108. A critical shift is not desired
as it creates a momentary loss of control of the rocker arm assembly 100 and valve
movement, and an impact to the system. The DVVL switching rocker arm was designed
to meet a lifetime worth of critical shift occurrences.
3.3.2.2 STORED OPERATING PARAMETERS
[0139] Operating parameters comprise stored information, used by the ECU 825 (Figure 18)
for switching logic control, based on data collected during extended testing as described
in later sections. Several examples of known operating parameters may be described:
In embodiments, 1) a minimum oil temperature of 20 degrees C is required for switching
from a high-lift state to a low-lift state, 2) a minimum oil pressure of greater than
2 Bar should be present in the engine sump for switching operations, 3) The latch
response switching time varies with oil temperature according to data plotted in Figures
21-22, 4) as shown in Figure 17 and previously described, predictable pressure variations
caused by hydraulic switching operations occur in the upper galleries 802, 803 (Figure
6) as determined by pressure sensors 890, 5) as shown in Figure 5 and previously described,
known valve movement versus crank angle (time), based on lift profiles 814, 816 can
be predetermined and stored.
3.3 CONTROL LOGIC
[0140] As noted above, DVVL switching can only occur during a small predetermined window
of time under certain operating conditions, and switching the DVVL system outside
of the timing window may result in a critical shift event, that could result in damage
to the valve train and/or other engine parts. Because engine conditions such as oil
pressure, temperature, emissions, and load may vary rapidly, a high-speed processor
can be used to analyze real-time conditions, compare them to known operating parameters
that characterize a working system, reconcile the results to determine when to switch,
and send a switching signal. These operations can be performed hundreds or thousands
of times per second. In embodiments, this computing function may be performed by a
dedicated processor, or by an existing multi-purpose automotive control system referred
to as the engine control unit (ECU). A typical ECU has an input section for analog
and digital data, a processing section that includes a microprocessor, programmable
memory, and random access memory, and an output section that might include relays,
switches, and warning light actuation.
[0141] In one embodiment, the engine control unit (ECU) 825 shown in Figures 6 and 18 accepts
input from multiple sensors such as valve stem movement 829, motion/position 828,
latch position 827, DFHLA movement 826, oil pressure 830, and oil temperature 890.
Data such as allowable operating temperature and pressure for given engine speeds
(Figure 20), and switching windows (Figure 26 and described in other sections), is
stored in memory. Real-time gathered information is then compared with stored information
and analyzed to provide the logic for ECU 825 switching timing and control.
[0142] After input is analyzed, a control signal is output by the ECU 825 to the OCV 820
to initiate switching operation, which may be timed to avoid critical shift events
while meeting engine performance goals such as improved fuel economy and lowered emissions.
If necessary, the ECU 825 may also alert operators to error conditions.
4. DVVL SWITCHING ROCKER ARM ASSEMBLY
4.1 ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION
[0143] A switching rocker arm, hydraulically actuated by pressurized fluid, for engaging
a cam is disclosed. An outer arm and inner arm are configured to transfer motion to
a valve of an internal combustion engine. A latching mechanism includes a latch, sleeve
and orientation member. The sleeve engages the latch and a bore in the inner arm,
and also provides an opening for an orientation member used in providing the correct
orientation for the latch with respect to the sleeve and the inner arm. The sleeve,
latch and inner arm have reference marks used to determine the optimal orientation
for the latch.
[0144] An exemplary switching rocker arm 100 may be configured during operation with a three
lobed cam 102 as illustrated in the perspective view of Figure 4. Alternatively, a
similar rocker arm embodiment could be configured to work with other cam designs such
as a two lobed cam. The switching rocker arm 100 is configured with a mechanism to
maintain hydraulic lash adjustment and a mechanism to feed hydraulic switching fluid
to the inner arm 122. In embodiments, a dual feed hydraulic lash adjuster (DFHLA)
110 performs both functions. A valve 112, spring 114, and spring retainer 116 are
also configured with the assembly. The cam 102 has a first and second high-lift lobe
104, 106 and a low lift lobe 108. The switching rocker arm has an outer arm 120 and
an inner arm 122, as shown in Figure 27. During operation, the high-lift lobes 104,
106 contact the outer arm 120 while the low lift-lobe contacts the inner arm 122.
The lobes cause periodic downward movement of the outer arm 120 and inner arm 122.
The downward motion is transferred to the valve 112 by inner arm 122, thereby opening
the valve. Rocker arm 100 is switchable between a high-lift mode and low-lift mode.
In the high-lift mode, the outer arm 120 is latched to the inner arm 122. During engine
operation, the high-lift lobes periodically push the outer arm 120 downward. Because
the outer arm 120 is latched to the inner arm 122, the high-lift motion is transferred
from outer arm 120 to inner arm 122 and further to the valve 112. When the rocker
arm 100 is in its low-lift mode, the outer arm 120 is not latched to the inner arm
122, and so high-lift movement exhibited by the outer arm 120 is not transferred to
the inner arm 122. Instead, the low-lift lobe contacts the inner arm 122 and generates
low lift motion that is transferred to the valve 112. When unlatched from inner arm
122, the outer arm 120 pivots about axle 118, but does not transfer motion to valve
112.
[0145] Figure 27 illustrates a perspective view of an exemplary switching rocker arm 100.
The switching rocker arm 100 is shown by way of example only and it will be appreciated
that the configuration of the switching rocker arm 100 that is the subject of this
disclosure is not limited to the configuration of the switching rocker arm 100 illustrated
in the figures contained herein.
[0146] As shown in Figure 27, the switching rocker arm 100 includes an outer arm 120 having
a first outer side arm 124 and a second outer side arm 126. An inner arm 122 is disposed
between the first outer side arm 124 and second outer side arm 126. The inner arm
122 and outer arm 120 are both mounted to a pivot axle 118, located adjacent the first
end 101 of the rocker arm 100, which secures the inner arm 122 to the outer arm 120
while also allowing a rotational degree of freedom about the pivot axle 118 of the
inner arm 122 with respect to the outer arm 120. In addition to the illustrated embodiment
having a separate pivot axle 118 mounted to the outer arm 120 and inner arm 122, the
pivot axle 118 may be part of the outer arm 120 or the inner arm 122.
[0147] The rocker arm 100 illustrated in Figure 27 has a roller bearing 128 that is configured
to engage a central low-lift lobe of a three-lobed cam. First and second slider pads
130, 132 of outer arm 120 are configured to engage the first and second high-lift
lobes 104, 106 shown in Figure 4. First and second torsion springs 134, 136 function
to bias the outer arm 120 upwardly after being displaced by the high-lift lobes 104,
106. The rocker arm design provides spring over-torque features.
[0148] First and second over-travel limiters 140, 142 of the outer arm prevent over-coiling
of the torsion springs 134, 136 and limit excess stress on the springs 134, 136. The
over-travel limiters 140, 142 contact the inner arm 122 on the first and second oil
gallery 144, 146 when the outer arm 120 reaches its maximum rotation during low- lift
mode. At this point, the interference between the over-travel limiters 140, 142 and
the galleries 144, 146 stops any further downward rotation of the outer arm 120. Figure
28 illustrates a top-down view of rocker arm 100. As shown in Figure 28, over-travel
limiters 140, 142 extend from outer arm 120 toward inner arm 122 to overlap with galleries
144, 146 of the inner arm 122, ensuring interference between limiters 140, 142 and
galleries 144, 146. As shown in Figure 29, representing a cross-section view taken
along line 29 - 29, contacting surface 143 of limiter 140 is contoured to match the
cross-sectional shape of gallery 144. This assists in applying even distribution of
force when limiters 140, 142 make contact with galleries 144, 146.
[0149] When the outer arm 120 reaches its maximum rotation during low-lift mode as described
above, a latch stop 90, shown in Figure 15, prevents the latch from extending, and
locking incorrectly. This feature can be configured as necessary, suitable to the
shape of the outer arm 120.
[0150] Figure 27 shows a perspective view from above of a rocker assembly 100 showing torsion
springs 134, 136 according to one embodiment of the teachings of the present application.
Figure 28 is a plan view of the rocker assembly 100 of Figure 27. This design shows
the rocker arm assembly 100 with torsion springs 134, 136 each coiled around a retaining
axle 118.
[0151] The switching rocker arm assembly 100 must be compact enough to fit in confined engine
spaces without sacrificing performance or durability. Traditional torsion springs
coiled from round wire sized to meet the torque requirements of the design, in some
embodiments, are too wide to fit in the allowable spring space 121 between the outer
arm 120 and the inner arm 122, as illustrated in Figure 28.
4.2 TORSION SPRING
[0152] A torsion spring 134, 136 design and manufacturing process is described that results
in a compact design with a generally rectangular shaped wire made with selected materials
of construction.
[0153] Now, with reference to Figures 15, 28, 30A, and 30B, the torsion springs 134, 136,
are constructed from a wire 397 that is generally trapezoidal in shape. The trapezoidal
shape is designed to allow wire 397 to deform into a generally rectangular shape as
force is applied during the winding process. After torsion spring 134, 136 is wound,
the shape of the resulting wires can be described as similar to a first wire 396 with
a generally rectangular shape cross section. A section along line 8 in Figure 28 shows
two torsion spring 134, 136 embodiments, illustrated as multiple coils 398, 399 in
cross section. In a preferred embodiment, wire 396 has a rectangular cross sectional
shape, with two elongated sides, shown here as the vertical sides 402, 404 and a top
401 and bottom 403. The ratio of the average length of side 402 and side 404 to the
average length of top 401 and bottom 403 of the coil can be any value less than 1.
This ratio produces more stiffness along the coil axis of bending 400 than a spring
coiled with round wire with a diameter equal to the average length of top 401 and
bottom 403 of the coil 398. In an alternate embodiment, the cross section wire shape
has a generally trapezoidal shape with a larger top 401 and a smaller bottom 403.
[0154] In this configuration, as the coils are wound, elongated side 402 of each coil rests
against the elongated side 402 of the previous coil, thereby stabilizing the torsion
springs 134, 136. The shape and arrangement holds all of the coils in an upright position,
preventing them from passing over each other or angling when under pressure.
[0155] When the rocker arm assembly 100 is operating, the generally rectangular or trapezoidal
shape of the torsion springs 134, 136, as they bend about axis 400 shown in Figures
30A, 30B, and Figure 19, produces high part stress, particularly tensile stress on
top surface 401.
[0156] To meet durability requirements, a combination of techniques and materials are used
together. For example, the torsion springs 134, 136 may be made of a material that
includes Chrome Vanadium alloy steel along with this design to improve strength and
durability.
[0157] The torsion spring 134, 136 may be heated and quickly cooled to temper the springs.
This reduces residual part stress.
[0158] Impacting the surface of the wire 396, 397 used for creating the torsion springs
134, 136 with projectiles, or 'shot peening' is used to put residual compressive stress
in the surface of the wire 396, 397. The wire 396, 397 is then wound into the torsion
springs 134, 136. Due to their shot peening, the resulting torsion springs 134, 136
can now accept more tensile stress than identical springs made without shot peening.
4.3 TORSION SPRING POCKET
[0159] The switching rocker arm assembly 100 may be compact enough to fit in confined engine
spaces with minimal impact to surrounding structures.
[0160] A switching rocker arm 100 provides a torsion spring pocket with retention features
formed by adjacent assembly components is described.
[0161] Now with reference to Figures 27, 19, 28, and 31, the assembly of the outer arm 120
and the inner arm 122 forms the spring pocket 119 as shown in Figure 31. The pocket
includes integral retaining features 119 for the ends of torsion springs 134, 136
of Figure 19.
[0162] Torsion springs 134, 136 can freely move along the axis of pivot axle 118. When fully
assembled, the first and second tabs 405, 406 on inner arm 122 retain inner ends 409,
410 of torsion springs 134, 136, respectively. The first and second over-travel limiters
140, 142 on the outer arm 120 assemble to prevent rotation and retain outer ends 407,
408 of the first and second torsion springs 134, 136, respectively, without undue
constraints or additional materials and parts.
4.4 OUTER ARM
[0163] The design of outer arm 120 is optimized for the specific loading expected during
operation, and its resistance to bending and torque applied by other means or from
other directions may cause it to deflect out of specification. Examples of non-operational
loads may be caused by handling or machining. A clamping feature or surface built
into the part, designed to assist in the clamping and holding process while grinding
the slider pads, a critical step needed to maintain parallelism between the slider
pads as it holds the part stationary without distortion. Figure 15 illustrates another
perspective view of the rocker arm 100. A first clamping lobe 150 protrudes from underneath
the first slider pad 130. A second clamping lobe (not shown) is similarly placed underneath
the second slider pad 132. During the manufacturing process, clamping lobes 150 are
engaged by clamps during grinding of the slider pads 130, 132. Forces are applied
to the clamping lobes 150 that restrain the outer arm 120 in position that resembles
it is assembled state as part of rocker arm assembly 100. Grinding of these surfaces
requires that the pads 130, 132 remain parallel to one another and that the outer
arm 120 not be distorted. Clamping at the clamping lobes 150 prevents distortion that
may occur to the outer arm 120 under other clamping arrangements. For example, clamping
at the clamping lobe 150, which are preferably integral to the outer arm 120, assist
in eliminating any mechanical stress that may occur by clamping that squeezes outer
side arms 124, 126 toward one another. In another example, the location of clamping
lobe 150 immediately underneath slider pads 130, 132, results in substantially zero
to minimal torque on the outer arm 120 caused by contact forces with the grinding
machine. In certain applications, it may be necessary to apply pressure to other portions
in outer arm 120 in order to minimize distortion.
4.5 DVVL ASSEMBLY OPERATION
[0164] Figure 19 illustrates an exploded view of the switching rocker arm 100 of Figures
27 and 15. With reference to Figures 19 and 28, when assembled, roller bearing 128
is part of a needle roller-type assembly 129, which may have needles 180 mounted between
the roller bearing 128 and roller axle 182. Roller axle 182 is mounted to the inner
arm 122 via roller axle apertures 183, 184. Roller assembly 129 serves to transfer
the rotational motion of the low-lift cam 108 to the inner rocker arm 122, and in
turn transfer motion to the valve 112 in the unlatched state. Pivot axle 118 is mounted
to inner arm 122 through collar 123 and to outer arm 120 through pivot axle apertures
160, 162 at the first end 101 of rocker arm 100. Lost motion rotation of the outer
arm 120 relative to the inner arm 122 in the unlatched state occurs about pivot axle
118. Lost motion movement in this context means movement of the outer arm 120 relative
to the inner arm 122 in the unlatched state. This motion does not transmit the rotating
motion of the first and second high-lift lobe 104, 106 of the cam 102 to the valve
112 in the unlatched state.
[0165] Other configurations other than the roller assembly 129 and pads 130, 132 also permit
the transfer of motion from cam 102 to rocker arm 100. For example, a smooth non-rotating
surface (not shown) such as pads 130, 132 may be placed on inner arm 122 to engage
low-lift lobe 108, and roller assemblies may be mounted to rocker arm 100 to transfer
motion from high-lift lobes 104, 106 to outer arm 120 of rocker arm 100.
[0166] Now, with reference to Figures 4, 19, and 12, as noted above, the exemplary switching
rocker arm 100 uses a three-lobed cam 102.
[0167] To make the design compact, with dynamic loading as close as possible to non-switching
rocker arm designs, slider pads 130, 132 are used as the surfaces that contact the
cam lobes 104, 106 during operation in high-lift mode. Slider pads produce more friction
during operation than other designs such as roller bearings, and the friction between
the first slider pad surface 130 and the first high-lift lobe surface 104, plus the
friction between the second slider pad 132 and the second high-lift lobe 106, creates
engine efficiency losses.
[0168] When the rocker arm assembly 100 is in high-lift mode, the full load of the valve
opening event is applied slider pads 130, 132. When the rocker arm assembly 100 is
in low-lift mode, the load of the valve opening event applied to slider pads 130,
132 is less, but present. Packaging constraints for the exemplary switching rocker
arm 100, require that the width of each slider pad 130, 132 as described by slider
pad edge length 710, 711 that come in contact with the cam lobes 104, 106 are narrower
than most existing slider interface designs. This results in higher part loading and
stresses than most existing slider pad interface designs. The friction results in
excessive wear to cam lobes 104, 106, and slider pads 130, 132, and when combined
with higher loading, may result in premature part failure. In the exemplary switching
rocker arm assembly, a coating such as a diamond like carbon coating is used on the
slider pads 130, 132 on the outer arm 120.
[0169] A diamond-like carbon coating (DLC) coating enables operation of the exemplary switching
rocker arm 100 by reducing friction, and at the same providing necessary wear and
loading characteristics for the slider pad surfaces 130, 132. As can be easily seen,
benefits of DLC coating can be applied to any part surfaces in this assembly or other
assemblies, for example the pivot axle surfaces 160, 162, on the outer arm 120 described
in Figure 19.
[0170] Although similar coating materials and processes exist, none are sufficient to meet
the following DVVL rocker arm assembly requirements: 1) be of sufficient hardness,
2) have suitable loadbearing capacity, 3) be chemically stable in the operating environment,
4) be applied in a process where temperatures do not exceed the annealing temperature
for the outer arm 120, 5) meet engine lifetime requirements, and 6) offer reduced
friction as compared to a steel on steel interface. The DLC coating process described
earlier meets the requirements set forth above, and is applied to slider pad surfaces
130, 132, which are ground to a final finish using a grinding wheel material and speed
that is developed for DLC coating applications. The slider pad surfaces 130, 132 are
also polished to a specific surface roughness, applied using one of several techniques,
for example vapor honing or fine particle sand blasting.
4.5.1 HYDRAULIC FLUID SYSTEM
[0171] The hydraulic latch for rocker arm assembly 100 must be built to fit into a compact
space, meet switching response time requirements, and minimize oil pumping losses.
Oil is conducted along fluid pathways at a controlled pressure, and applied to controlled
volumes in a way that provides the necessary force and speed to activate latch pin
switching. The hydraulic conduits require specific clearances and sizes so that the
system has the correct hydraulic stiffness and resulting switching response time.
The design of the hydraulic system must be coordinated with other elements that comprise
the switching mechanism, for example the biasing spring 230.
[0172] In the switching rocker arm 100, oil is transmitted through a series of fluid-connected
chambers and passages to the latch pin assembly 201, or any other hydraulically activated
latch pin mechanism. As described above, the hydraulic transmission system begins
at oil flow port 506 in the DFHLA 110, where oil or another hydraulic fluid at a controlled
pressure is introduced. Pressure can be modulated with a switching device, for example,
a solenoid valve. After leaving the ball plunger end601, oil or other pressurized
fluid is directed from this single location, through the first oil gallery 144 and
the second oil gallery 146 of the inner arm discussed above, which have bores sized
to minimize pressure drop as oil flows from the ball socket 502, shown in Figure 10,
to the latch pin assembly 201 in Figure 19.
[0173] The latch pin assembly 201 for latching inner arm 122 to outer arm 120, which in
the illustrated embodiment is found near second end 103 of rocker arm 100, is shown
in Figure 19 as including a latch pin 200 that is extended in high-lift mode, securing
inner arm 122 to outer arm 120. In low-lift mode, latch 200 is retracted into inner
arm 122, allowing lost motion movement of outer arm 120. Oil pressure is used to control
latch pin 200 movement.
[0174] As illustrated in Figure 32, one embodiment of a latch pin assembly shows that the
oil galleries 144, 146 (shown in Figure 19) are in fluid communication with the chamber
250 through oil opening 280.
[0175] The oil is provided to oil opening 280 and the latch pin assembly 201 at a range
of pressures, depending on the required mode of operation.
[0176] As can be seen in Figure 33, upon introduction of pressurized oil into chamber 250,
latch 200 retracts into bore 240, allowing outer arm 120 to undergo lost motion rotation
with respect to inner arm 122. Oil can be transmitted between the first generally
cylindrical surface 205 and surface 241, from first chamber 250 to second chamber
420 shown in Figure 32.
[0177] Some of the oil exits back to the engine through hole 209, drilled into the inner
arm 122. The remaining oil is pushed back through the hydraulic pathways as the biasing
spring 230 expands when it returns to the latched high-lift state. It can be seen
that a similar flow path can be employed for latch mechanisms that are biased for
normally unlatched operation.
[0178] The latch pin assembly design manages latch pin response time through a combination
of clearances, tolerances, hole sizes, chamber sizes, spring designs, and similar
metrics that control the flow of oil. For example, the latch pin design may include
features such as a dual diameter pin designed with an active hydraulic area to operate
within tolerance in a given pressure range, an oil sealing land designed to limit
oil pumping losses, or a chamfer oil in-feed.
[0179] Now, with reference to Figures 32-34, latch 200 contains design features that provide
multiple functions in a limited space:
- 1. Latch 200 employs the first generally cylindrical surface 205 and the second generally
cylindrical surface 206. First generally cylindrical surface 205 has a diameter larger
than that of the second generally cylindrical surface 206. When pin 200 and sleeve
210 are assembled together in bore 240, a chamber 250 is formed without employing
any additional parts. As noted, this volume is in fluid communication with oil opening
280. Additionally, the area of pressurizing surface 422, combined with the transmitted
oil pressure, can be controlled to provide the necessary force to move the pin 200,
compress the biasing spring 230, and switch to low-lift mode (unlatched).
- 2. The space between the first generally cylindrical surface 205 and the adjacent
bore wall 241 is intended to minimize the amount of oil that flows from chamber 250
into second chamber 420. The clearance between the first generally cylindrical surface
205 and surface 241 must be closely controlled to allow freedom of movement of pin
200 without oil leakage and associated oil pumping losses as oil is transmitted between
first generally cylindrical surface 205 and surface 241, from chamber 250 to second
chamber 420.
- 3. Package constraints require that the distance along the axis of movement of the
pin 200 be minimized. In some operating conditions, the available oil sealing land
424 may not be sufficient to control the flow of oil that is transmitted between first
generally cylindrical surface 205 and surface 241, from chamber 250 to the second
chamber 420. An annular sealing surface is described. As latch 200 retracts, it encounters
bore wall 208 with its rear surface 203. In one preferred embodiment, rear surface
203 of latch 200 has a flat annular or sealing surface 207 that lies generally perpendicular
to first and second generally cylindrical bore wall 241, 242, and parallel to bore
wall 208. The flat annular surface 207 forms a seal against bore wall 208, which reduces
oil leakage from chamber 250 through the seal formed by first generally cylindrical
surface 205 of latch 200 and first generally cylindrical bore wall 241. The area of
sealing surface 207 is sized to minimize separation resistance caused by a thin film
of oil between the sealing surface 207 and the bore wall 208 shown in Figure 32, while
maintaining a seal that prevents pressurized oil from flowing between the sealing
surface 207 and the bore wall 208, and out hole 209.
- 4. In one latch pin 200 embodiment, an oil in-feed surface 426, for example a chamfer,
provides an initial pressurizing surface area to allow faster initiation of switching,
and overcome separation resistance caused by a thin film of oil between the pressurization
surface 422 and the sleeve end 427 . The size and angle of the chamfer allows ease
of switching initiation, without unplanned initiation due to oil pressure variations
encountered during normal operation. In a second latch pin 200 embodiment, a series
of castellations 428, arranged radially as shown in Figure 34, provide an initial
pressurizing surface area, sized to allow faster initiation of switching, and overcome
separation resistance caused by a thin film of oil between the pressurization surface
422 and the sleeve end 427.
[0180] An oil in-feed surface 426 can also reduce the pressure and oil pumping losses required
for switching by lowering the requirement for the breakaway force between pressurization
surface 422 and the sleeve end 427. These relationships can be shown as incremental
improvements to switching response and pumping losses.
[0181] As oil flows throughout the previously-described switching rocker arm assembly 100
hydraulic system, the relationship between oil pressure and oil fluid pathway area
and length largely defines the reaction time of the hydraulic system, which also directly
affects switching response time. For example, if high pressure oil at high velocity
enters a large volume, its velocity will suddenly slow, decreasing its hydraulic reaction
time, or stiffness. A range of these relationships that are specific to the operation
of switching rocker arm assembly 100 can be calculated. One relationship, for example,
can be described as follows: oil at a pressure of 2 bar is supplied to chamber 250,
where the oil pressure, divided by the pressurizing surface area, transmits a force
that overcomes biasing spring 230 force, and initiates switching within 10 milliseconds
from latched to unlatched operation.
[0182] A range of characteristic relationships that result in acceptable hydraulic stiffness
and response time, with minimized oil pumping losses can be calculated from system
design variables that can be defined as follows:
- Oil gallery 144, 146 inside diameter and length from the ball socket 502 to hole 280.
- Bore hole 280 diameter and length
- Area of pressurizing surface 422
- The volume of chamber 250 in all states of operation
- The volume of second chamber 420 in all states of operation
- Cross-sectional area created by the space between first generally cylindrical surface
205 and surface 241.
- The length of oil sealing land 424
- The area of the flat annular surface 207
- The diameter of hole 209
- Oil pressure supplied by the DFHLA 110
- Stiffness of biasing spring 230
- The cross sectional area and length of flow channels 504, 508, 509
- The area and number of oil in-feed surfaces 426.
- The number and cross sectional area of castellations 428
[0183] Latch response times for the previously described hydraulic arrangement in switching
rocker arm 100 can be described for a range of conditions, for example:
Oil temperatures: 10°C to 120°C
Oil type: 5w-20 weight
[0184] This conditions result in a range of oil viscosities that affect the latch response
time.
4.5.2 LATCH PIN MECHANISM
[0185] The latch pin assembly 201 of rocker arm assembly 100 provides a means of mechanically
switching from high-lift to low-lift and vice versa. A latch pin mechanism can be
configured to be normally in an unlatched or latched state. Several preferred embodiments
can be described.
[0186] In one embodiment, the latch pin assembly 201 for latching inner arm 122 to outer
arm 120, which is found near second end 103 of rocker arm 100, is shown in Figure
19 as comprising latch pin 200, sleeve 210, orientation pin 220, and latch spring
230. The latch pin assembly 201 is configured to be mounted inside inner arm 122 within
bore 240. As explained below, in the assembled rocker arm 100, latch 200 is extended
in high-lift mode, securing inner arm 122 to outer arm 120. In low-lift mode, latch
200 is retracted into inner arm 122, allowing lost motion movement of outer arm 120.
Switched oil pressure, as described previously, is provided through the first and
second oil gallery 144, 146 to control whether latch 200 is latched or unlatched.
Plugs 170 are inserted into gallery holes 172 to form a pressure tight seal closing
first and second oil gallery 144, 146 and allowing them to pass oil to latching mechanism
201.
[0187] Figure 32 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the latch pin assembly 201 in its
latched state along the line 32, 33 - 32, 33 in Figure 28. A latch 200 is disposed
within bore 240. Latch 200 has a spring bore 202 in which biasing spring 230 is inserted.
The latch 200 has a rear surface 203 and a front surface 204. Latch 200 also employs
the first generally cylindrical surface 205 and a second generally cylindrical surface
206. First generally cylindrical surface 205 has a diameter larger than that of the
second generally cylindrical surface 206. Spring bore 202 is generally concentric
with surfaces 205, 206.
[0188] Sleeve 210 has a generally cylindrical outer surface 211 that interfaces a first
generally cylindrical bore wall 241, and a generally cylindrical inner surface 215.
Bore 240 has a first generally cylindrical bore wall 241, and a second generally cylindrical
bore wall 242 having a larger diameter than first generally cylindrical bore wall
241. The generally cylindrical outer surface 211 of sleeve 210 and first generally
cylindrical surface 205 of latch 200 engage first generally cylindrical bore wall
241 to form tight pressure seals. Further, the generally cylindrical inner surface
215 of sleeve 210 also forms a tight pressure seal with second generally cylindrical
surface 206 of latch 200. During operation, these seals allow oil pressure to build
in chamber 250, which encircles second generally cylindrical surface 206 of latch
200.
[0189] The default position of latch 200, shown in Figure 32, is the latched position. Spring
230 biases latch 200 outwardly from bore 240 into the latched position. Oil pressure
applied to chamber 250 retracts latch 200 and moves it into the unlatched position.
Other configurations are also possible, such as where spring 230 biases latch 200
in the unlatched position, and application of oil pressure between bore wall 208 and
rear surface 203 causes latch 200 to extend outwardly from the bore 240 to latch outer
arm 120.
[0190] In the latched state, latch 200 engages a latch surface 214 of outer arm 120 with
arm engaging surface 213. As shown in Figure 32, outer arm 120 is impeded from moving
downward and will transfer motion to inner arm 122 through latch 200. An orientation
feature 212 takes the form of a channel into which orientation pin 221 extends from
outside inner arm 122 through first pin opening 217 and then through second pin opening
218 in sleeve 210. The orientation pin 221 is generally solid and smooth. A retainer
222 secures pin 221 in place. The orientation pin 221 prevents excessive rotation
of latch 200 within bore 240.
[0191] As previously described, and seen in Figure 33, upon introduction of pressurized
oil into chamber 250, latch 200 retracts into bore 240, allowing outer arm 120 to
undergo lost motion rotation with respect to inner arm 122. The outer arm 120 is then
no longer impeded by latch 200 from moving downward and exhibiting lost motion movement.
Pressurized oil is introduced into chamber 250 through oil opening 280, which is in
fluid communication with oil galleries 144, 146.
[0192] Figures 35A-35F illustrate several retention devices for orientation pin 221. In
Figure 35A, pin 221 is cylindrical with a uniform thickness. A push-on ring 910, as
shown in Figure 35C is located in recess 224 located in sleeve 210. Pin 221 is inserted
into ring 910, causing teeth 912 to deform and secure pin 221 to ring 910. Pin 221
is then secured in place due to the ring 910 being enclosed within recess 224 by inner
arm 122. In another embodiment, shown in Figure 35B, pin 221 has a slot 902 in which
teeth 912 of ring 910 press, securing ring 910 to pin 221. In another embodiment shown
in Figure 35D, pin 221 has a slot 904 in which an E-styled clip 914 of the kind shown
in Figure 35E, or a bowed E-styled clip 914 as shown in Figure 35F may be inserted
to secure pin 221 in place with respect to inner arm 122. In yet other embodiments,
wire rings may be used in lieu of stamped rings. During assembly, the E-styled clip
914 is placed in recess 224, at which point the sleeve 210 is inserted into inner
arm 122, then, the orientation pin 221 is inserted through the clip 910.
[0193] An exemplary latch 200 is shown in Figure 36. The latch 200 is generally divided
into a head portion 290 and a body portion 292. The front surface 204 is a protruding
convex curved surface. This surface shape extends toward outer arm 120 and results
in an increased chance of proper engagement of arm engaging surface 213 of latch 200
with outer arm 120. Arm engaging surface 213 comprises a generally flat surface. Arm
engaging surface 213extends from a first boundary 285 with second generally cylindrical
surface 206 to a second boundary 286 and from a boundary 287 with the front surface
to a boundary 233 with surface 232. The portion of arm engaging surface 213 that extends
furthest from surface 232 in the direction of the longitudinal axis A of latch 200
is located substantially equidistant between first boundary 285 and second boundary
286. Conversely, the portion of arm engaging surface 213 that extends the least from
surface 232 in the axial direction A is located substantially at first and second
boundaries 285, 286. Front surface 204 need not be a convex curved surface but instead
can be a v-shaped surface, or some other shape. The arrangement permits greater rotation
of the latch 200 within bore 240 while improving the likelihood of proper engagement
of arm engaging surface 213 of latch 200 with outer arm 120.
[0194] An alternative latch pin assembly 201 is shown in Figure 37. An orientation plug
1000, in the form of a hollow cup-shaped plug, is press-fit into sleeve hole 1002
and orients latch 200 by extending into orientation feature 212, preventing latch
200 from rotating excessively with respect to sleeve 210. As discussed further below,
an aligning slot 1004 assists in orienting the latch 200 within sleeve 210 and ultimately
within inner arm 122 by providing a feature by which latch 200 may be rotated within
the sleeve 210. The alignment slot 1004 may serve as a feature with which to rotate
the latch 200, and also to measure its relative orientation.
[0195] With reference to Figures 38-40, an exemplary method of assembling a switching rocker
arm 100 is as follows: the orientation plug 1000 is press-fit into sleeve hole 1002
and latch 200 is inserted into generally cylindrical inner surface 215 of sleeve 210.
[0196] The latch pin 200 is then rotated clockwise until orientation feature 212 reaches
plug 1000, at which point interference between the orientation feature 212 and plug
1000 prevents further rotation. An angle measurement A1, as shown in Figure 38, is
then taken corresponding to the angle between arm engaging surface 213 and sleeve
references 1010, 1012, which are aligned to be perpendicular to sleeve hole 1002.
Aligning slot 1004 may also serve as a reference line for latch 200, and key slots
1014 may also serve as references located on sleeve 210. The latch pin 200 is then
rotated counterclockwise until orientation feature 212 reaches plug 1000, preventing
further rotation. As seen in Figure 39, a second angle measurement A2 is taken corresponding
to the angle between arm engaging surface 213 and sleeve references 1010, 1012. Rotating
counterclockwise and then clockwise is also permissible in order to obtain A1 and
A2. As shown in Figure 40, upon insertion into the inner arm 122, the sleeve 210 and
pin subassembly 1200 is rotated by an angle A as measured between inner arm references
1020 and sleeve references 1010, 1012, resulting in the arm engaging surface 213 being
oriented horizontally with respect to inner arm 122, as indicated by inner arm references
1020. The amount of rotation A should be chosen to maximize the likelihood the latch
200 will engage outer arm 120. One such example is to rotate subassembly 1200 an angle
half of the difference of A2 and AI as measured from inner arm references 1020. Other
amounts of adjustment A are possible within the scope of the present disclosure.
[0197] A profile of an alternative embodiment of pin 1000 is shown in Figure 41. Here, the
pin 1000 is hollow, partially enclosing an inner volume 1050. The pin has a substantially
cylindrical first wall 1030 and a substantially cylindrical second wall 1040. The
substantially cylindrical first wall 1030 has a diameter D1 larger than diameter D2
of second wall 1040. In one embodiment shown in Figure 41, a flange 1025 is used to
limit movement of pin 1000 downwardly through pin opening 218 in sleeve 210. In a
second embodiment shown in Figure 42, a press-fit limits movement of pin 1000 downwardly
through pin opening 218 in sleeve 210.
[0198] The latch embodiments described above utilize a flat mating surface to engage or
disengage during switching operations, thus providing a predictable contact area with
relatively low contact stress for the mating parts. As described above, this pin design
requires additional parts and features to ensure proper orientation during operation,
adding complexity and cost to the rocker arm manufacturing and assembly process.
[0199] Another latch embodiment incorporates a round or other non-flat latch pin that eliminates
the need to provide pin orientation. In the past is was thought that in order to utilize
a round or other non-flat rocker arm latch, the mating surface would require an expensive
high-tolerance 'ground-in' curved mating surface, or latch seat, with a radius very
closely matching the latch pin radius. A seat that is slightly too small may cause
sticking, a delayed release, and possibly cause impact with the corners of the latch
seat. A latch seat that is too large allows too much lateral motion. As described
below, a round or other non-flat latch embodiment that does not require grinding can
be produced using a coining process.
[0200] In the example shown, for a truly round latch with no flat latch shelf, the need
to orient the latch in the rocker arm that it resides in is eliminated. By eliminating
the need to orient the latch, assembly parts and risk may be eliminated.
[0201] This process will also likely reduce or eliminate the need to categorize latch, inner
arm, and outer arm dimensions required to meet lash requirements for a given rocker
arm assembly. This is accomplished by being able to adjust the latch lash at the end
of the assembly processes.
[0202] A method for manufacturing a rocker arm assembly that utilizes a round or non-flat
latch embodiment is described later. As noted, this process modifies this mating surface
by way of a coining process.
[0203] The present invention employs a non-flat latch, such as a latch with a round cross
section that interfaces with a latch seat that has been modified from a flat section.
[0204] The present invention includes a design that can achieve a curved mating surface
that matches what the latch requirements are, and does not require a grinding process.
The process modifies this mating surface by way of a coining process. By using a truly
round latch with no flat latch shelf we eliminate the need to orient the latch in
the rocker arm that it resides in. By eliminating the need to orient the latch you
eliminate parts from the assembly and risk from the assembly.
[0205] This process will likely reduce or eliminate categories of latches and the need to
categorize the inner and outer arm. This is accomplished by being able to adjust the
latch lash at the end of the assembly processes.
[0206] The description here explains a VVL rocker arm assembly that has a normally unlatched
latch position. This process also can be used for a CDA rocker arm assembly, and other
switching rocker arm assemblies. The rocker assembly is partially assembled with a
roller bearing installed. The latch hasn't been installed at this point.
[0207] The second end 103 of the outer arm 120 has been investment cast and the latch seat
214 has been coined flat as shown in Figures 134 and 135.
[0208] Next, the outer arm will be 3-point located on a fixture so that it is supported
under the arm directly below the pivot holes on both sides of the arm. It will then
be located with a swivel locator directly in the middle of the latch mating surface,
giving a 3-point location. It will then be clamped directly above these points with
swivel foot clamps so as not to distort the part.
[0209] Now the pivot hole will be machined. Next this outer arm will be heat treated. Now
the pivot hole will be honed.
[0210] After that, the pivot holes are honed. The part is mounted on a fixture with a pin
passing through the pivot holes of the outer arm 120 and the datum hole on the fixture.
The outer arm 120 will also rest on a swivel foot post that is directly below the
coined latch pad surface, again giving 3 point location and eliminating part distortion.
While on this fixture the stop bar will be machined to the proper height and parallel
to the pivot hole axis. Now the outer arm will be located on the pivot holes and the
stop bar to do the final grind on the slider pads. Both arms will now be assembled.
Springs are installed on the inner arm spring posts then the two arms are assembled
and pivot pin is installed.
[0211] Figure 134 shows a partially assembled switching rocker arm assembly 100 as viewed
from its second end 103. This view shows the bottom side upward, such that the lower
cross arm 439 is visible. The inner arm assembly 622 (also shown in Figures 44 and
45) is hanging downward. This shows a latch bore 240 (that is also shown in Figures
19, 33).
[0212] This end 103 of the outer arm 120 also shows the latch stop 90. (Figure 15 shows
another view of the latch stop 15.) As indicated above, prior art methods of machining
the latch seat were done only on the outer arm 120 and were measured independent of
the other parts, and not as an assembly. Since the outer arm 120 was machined by itself,
the connections to other parts were not taken into account during measurements. In
the current method and device, the assembled, or partially assembled switching rocker
arm assembly 100 is processed and measured interactively. Therefore, the lash contributed
by the assembly is measured instead of the lash originating from a single part. Figure
135 is a perspective view showing the switching rocker arm assembly with a latch rod
199 inserted into, and extending from latch bore 240. The latch rod 199 is intended
to be made of a material that is harder than the material of the latch seat 214. The
switching rocker arm assembly 100 is in the latched position in which the latch pin
(here, the latch rod 199) is extended and rests upon the latch seat 214.
[0213] Figure 136 shows a manufacturing fixture 310 directed toward completing manufacture
of the switching rocker arm assembly 100. Specifically, it will be used in holding
the switching rocker arm assembly 100 when creating precise impressions or indentations
in the latch seat 214 of Figures 134, 135.
[0214] The switching rocker arm assembly 100 is now placed on the fixture shown in Figure
136 that has a post to simulate a ball plunger and a post to simulate a valve tip.
The manufacturing fixture 310 as shown in this embodiment is a three-point mount.
It has a support shelf 311 sized and shaped to support a latch pin or similarly shaped
structure when a switching rocker arm assembly is mounted on the manufacturing fixture
310. There is a valve stem post 315 for supporting a first end (101 of Figure 15)
of the switching rocker arm assembly and a valve stem post 313 for supporting a second
end (103 OF Figure 15) of the switching rocker arm assembly.
[0215] The inner arm will rest on the ball plunger post 315 and be guided from side to side
by the valve tip post. The latch rod 199 is sized to have a tight slip fit into the
latch bore 240 is then slide into the inner arm 122. The latch rod 199 will extend
out of the inner arm 122 (for example, by approximately 10 mm). The latch rod 199
will then rest on a flat carbide support shelf 311 on the manufacturing fixture 310.
At this point the rocker arm assembly 100 is being supported by the ball plunger post
315 and the latch rod 199 sitting on the support shelf 311 as shown in Figure 137.
[0216] The rocker arm assembly 100 is being controlled from side to side by the ball plunger
post 315 and the valve tip post 313. Now a load is applied by a press 317 to the outer
arm 120 directly above the latch surface and on top of the outer arm 120. (The press
may be a hydraulic, screw, or any other form of controlled power press.) This load
will be increased until the correct latch lash is achieved. The latch seat 214 of
the outer arm 120 now has a perfectly coined indention in the surface that directly
matches the latch pin (200 of Figures 8, 9).
[0217] Figure 137 is a disassembled view of the outer arm 120 after the process showing
the latch seat 214. By creating this indention the latch pin (200 of Figures 8, 9)
no longer has point contact and the latch seat 214 will have a contact stress level
that is low enough to operate without failure. Since the latch seat is formed with
the nearly fully assembled switching rocker arm assembly 100, it should be noted that
the switching rocker arm assembly 100 only need to have the latch pin inserted to
complete the assembly process. After the process of forming the impression in the
latch seat 214. The disassembled view of the outer arm 120 if Figure 137 was provided
only to show the impression made in the latch seat 214.
[0218] Below is an example of steps to implement the process.
- 1. Milling the mating surface into a flat latch seat 214.
- 2. Apply loads through the outer arm 120 onto a latch rod 199 (which is preferably
a carbide pin) that simulates a latch pin that is located in the latch bore 240 of
the inner rocker arm 122 to coin, indent or form an impression in the latch seat 214.
(The carbide pin/rod could also be of any material found to suitable for the coining/indenting
process.)
- 3. This will require a manufacturing fixture 310 to hold the assembly in a press.
- 4. Increase loads until a desired deformation or chord depth is achieved in the latch
seat 214 for a desired lash.
- 5. Measure traces across the outer arm 120 at each incremental load increase and record
and place trace data.
- 6. The traces should be taken at the inner most edge and the mid pad areas for each
load.
- 7. The inner arm 122 is reassembled with a standard round latch assembly 200.
- 8. The cam lash and total lash are measured to verify that the assembly meets specifications.
4.6 DVVL ASSEMBLY LASH MANAGEMENT
[0219] A method of managing three or more lash values, or design clearances, in the DVVL
switching rocker arm assembly 100 shown in Figure 4, is described. Methods may include
a range of manufacturing tolerances, wear allowances, and design profiles for cam
lobe/ rocker arm contact surfaces.
DVVL Assembly Lash Description
[0220] An exemplary rocker arm assembly 100 shown in Figure 4 has one or more lash values
that must be maintained in one or more locations in the assembly. The three-lobed
cam 102, illustrated in Figure 4, is comprised of three cam lobes, a first high lift
lobe 104, a second high lift lobe 106, and a low lift lobe 108. Cam lobes 104, 106,
and 108, are comprised of profiles that respectively include a base circle 605, 607,
609, described as generally circular and concentric with the cam shaft.
[0221] The switching rocker arm assembly 100 shown in Figure 4 was designed to have small
clearances (lash) in two locations. The first location, illustrated in Figure 43,
is latch lash 602, the distance between latch pad surface 214 and the arm engaging
surface 213. Latch lash 602 ensures that the latch 200 is not loaded and can move
freely when switching between high-lift and low-lift modes. As shown in Figures 4,
27, 43, and 49, a second example of lash, the distance between the first slider pad
130 and the first high lift cam lobe base circle 605, is illustrated as camshaft lash
610. Camshaft lash 610 eliminates contact, and by extension, friction losses, between
slider pads 130, 132, and their respective high lift cam lobe base circles 605, 607
when the roller bearing 128, shown in Figure 49, is contacting the low-lift cam base
circle 609 during low-lift operation.
[0222] During low-lift mode, camshaft lash 610 also prevents the torsion spring 134, 136
force from being transferred to the DFHLA 110 during base circle 609 operation. This
allows the DFHLA 110 to operate like a standard rocker arm assembly with normal hydraulic
lash compensation where the lash compensation portion of the DFHLA is supplied directly
from an engine oil pressure gallery. As shown in Figure 47, this action is facilitated
by the rotational stop 621, 623 within the switching rocker arm assembly 100 that
prevents the outer arm 120 from rotating sufficiently far due to the torsion spring
134, 136 force to contact the high lift lobes 104, 106.
[0223] As illustrated in Figures 43 and 48, total mechanical lash is the sum of camshaft
lash 610 and latch lash 602. The sum affects valve motion. The high lift camshaft
profiles include opening and closing ramps 661 to compensate for total mechanical
lash 612. Minimal variation in total mechanical lash 612 is important to maintain
performance targets throughout the life of the engine. To keep lash within the specified
range, the total mechanical lash 612 tolerance is closely controlled in production.
Because component wear correlates to a change in total mechanical lash, low levels
of component wear are allowed throughout the life of the mechanism. Extensive durability
shows that allocated wear allowance and total mechanical lash remain within the specified
limits through end of life testing.
[0224] Referring to the graph shown in Figure 48, lash in in millimeters is on the vertical
axis, and camshaft angle in degrees is arranged on the horizontal axis. The linear
portion 661 of the valve lift profile 660 shows a constant change of distance in millimeters
for a given change in camshaft angle, and represents a region where closing velocity
between contact surfaces is constant. For example, during the linear portion 661 of
the valve lift profile curve 660, when the rocker arm assembly 100 (Figure 4) switches
from low-lift mode to high-lift mode, the closing distance between the first slider
pad 130, and the first high-lift lobe 104 (Figure 43), represents a constant velocity.
Utilizing the constant velocity region reduces impact loading due to acceleration.
[0225] As noted in Figure 48, no valve lift occurs during the constant velocity 'no lift'
portion 661 of the valve lift profile curve 660. If total lash is reduced or closely
controlled through improved system design, manufacturing, or assembly processes, the
amount of time required for the linear velocity portion of the valve lift profile
is reduced, providing engine management benefits, for example allowing earlier valve
opening or consistent valve operation engine to engine.
[0226] Now, as to Figures 43, 47, and 48, design and assembly variations for individual
parts and sub-assemblies can produce a matrix of lash values that meet switch timing
specifications and reduce the required constant velocity switching region described
previously. For example, one latch pin 200 self-aligning embodiment may include a
feature that requires a minimum latch lash 602 of 10 microns to function. An improved
modified latch 200, configured without a self-aligning feature may be designed that
requires a latch lash 602 of 5 microns. This design change decreases the total lash
by 5 microns, and decreases the required no lift 661 portion of the valve lift profile
660.
[0227] Latch lash 602, and camshaft lash 610 shown in Figure 43, can be described in a similar
manner for any design variation of switching rocker arm assembly 100 of Figure 4 that
uses other methods of contact with the three-lobed cam 102. In one embodiment, a sliding
pad similar to 130 is used instead of roller bearing 128 (Figures 15 and 27). In a
second embodiment, rollers similar to 128 are used in place of slider pad 130 and
slider pad 132. There are also other embodiments that have combinations of rollers
and sliders.
Lash Management, Testing
[0228] As described in following sections, the design and manufacturing methods used to
manage lash were tested and verified for a range of expected operating conditions
to simulate both normal operation and conditions representing higher stress conditions.
[0229] Durability of the DVVL switching rocker arm is assessed by demonstrating continued
performance (i.e., valves opening and closing properly) combined with wear measurements.
Wear is assessed by quantifying loss of material on the DVVL switching rocker arm,
specifically the DLC coating, along with the relative amounts of mechanical lash in
the system. As noted above, latch lash 602 (Figure 43) is necessary to allow movement
of the latch pin between the inner and outer arm to enable both high and low lift
operation when commanded by the engine electronic control unit (ECU). An increase
in lash for any reason on the DVVL switching rocker arm reduces the available no-lift
ramp 661 (Figure 48), resulting in high accelerations of the valve-train. The specification
for wear with regards to mechanical lash is set to allow limit build parts to maintain
desirable dynamic performance at end of life.
[0230] For example, as shown in Figures 43, wear between contacting surfaces in the rocker
arm assembly will change latch lash 602, cam shaft lash 610, and the resulting total
lash. Wear that affects these respective values can be described as follows: 1) wear
at the interface between the roller bearing 128 (Figure 15) and the cam lobe 108 (Figure
4) reduces total lash, 2) wear at the sliding interface between slider pads 130, 132
(Figure 15) and cam lobes 104, 106 (Figure 4) increases total lash, and 3) wear between
the latch 200 and the latch pad surface 214 increases total lash. Since bearing interface
wear decreases total lash and latch and slider interface wear increase total lash,
overall wear may result in minimal net total lash change over the life of the rocker
arm assembly.
4.7 DVVL ASSEMBLY DYNAMICS
[0231] The weight distribution, stiffness, and inertia for traditional rocker arms have
been optimized for a specified range of operating speeds and reaction forces that
are related to dynamic stability, valve tip loading and valve spring compression during
operation. An exemplary switching rocker arm 100, illustrated in Figure 4 has the
same design requirements as the traditional rocker arm, with additional constraints
imposed by the added mass and the switching functions of the assembly. Other factors
must be considered as well, including shock loading due to mode-switching errors and
subassembly functional requirements. Designs that reduce mass and inertia, but do
not effectively address the distribution of material needed to maintain structural
stiffness and resist stress in key areas can result in parts that deflect out of specification
or become overstressed, both of which are conditions that may lead to poor switching
performance and premature part failure. The DVVL rocker arm assembly 100, shown in
Figure 4, must be dynamically stable to 3500 rpm in low lift mode and 7300 rpm in
high lift mode to meet performance requirements.
[0232] As to Figures 4, 15, 19, and 27, DVVL rocker arm assembly 100 stiffness is evaluated
in both low lift and high lift modes. In low lift mode, the inner arm 122 transmits
force to open the valve 112. The engine packaging volume allowance and the functional
parameters of the inner arm 122 do not require a highly optimized structure, as the
inner arm stiffness is greater than that of a fixed rocker arm for the same application.
In high lift mode, the outer arm 120 works in conjunction with the inner arm 122 to
transmit force to open the valve 112. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) techniques show
that the outer arm 120 is the most compliant member, as illustrated in Figure 50 in
an exemplary plot showing a maximum area of vertical deflection 670. Mass distribution
and stiffness optimization for this part is focused on increasing the vertical section
height of the outer arm 120 between the slider pads 130, 132 and the latch 200. Design
limits on the upper profile of the outer arm 120 are based on clearance between the
outer arm 120 and the swept profile of the high lift lobes 104, 106. Design limits
on the lower profile of the outer arm 120 are based on clearance to the valve spring
retainer 116 in low lift mode. Optimizing material distribution within the described
design constraints decreases the vertical deflection and increased stiffness, in one
example, more than 33 percent over initial designs.
[0233] As shown in Figures 15 and 52, the DVVL rocker arm assembly 100 is designed to minimize
inertia as it pivots about the ball plunger contact point 611 of the DFHLA 110 by
biasing mass of the assembly as much as possible towards side 101. This results in
a general arrangement with two components of significant mass, the pivot axle 118
and the torsion springs 134 136, located near the DFHLA 110 at side 101. With pivot
axle 118 in this location, the latch 200 is located at end 103 of the DVVL rocker
arm assembly 100.
[0234] Figure 55 is a plot that compares the DVVL rocker arm assembly 100 stiffness in high-lift
mode with other standard rocker arms. The DVVL rocker arm assembly 100 has lower stiffness
than the fixed rocker arm for this application; however, its stiffness is in the existing
range rocker arms used in similar valve train configurations now in production. The
inertia of the DVVL rocker arm assembly 100 is approximately double the inertia of
a fixed rocker arm, however, its inertia is only slightly above the mean for rocker
arms used in similar valve train configurations now in production. The overall effective
mass of the intake valve train, consisting of multiple DVVL rocker arm assemblies
100 is 28% greater than a fixed intake valve train. These stiffness, mass, and inertia
values require optimization of each component and subassembly to ensure minimum inertia
and maximum stiffness while meeting operational design criteria.
4.7.1 DVVL ASSEMBLY DYNAMICS DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0235] The major components that comprise total inertia for the rocker arm assembly 100
are illustrated in Figure 53. These are the inner arm assembly 622, the outer arm
120, and the torsion springs 134, 136. As noted, functional requirements of the inner
arm assembly 622, for example, its hydraulic fluid transfer pathways and its latch
pin mechanism housing, require a stiffer structure than a fixed rocker arm for the
same application. In the following description, the inner arm assembly 622 is considered
a single part.
[0236] Referring to Figures 51-53, Figure 51 shows a top view of the rocker arm assembly
100 in Figure 4. Figure 52 is a section view along the line 52 - 52 in Figure 51 that
illustrates loading contact points for the rocker arm assembly 100. The rotating three
lobed cam 102 imparts a cam load 616 to the roller bearing 128 or, depending on mode
of operation, to the slider pads 130, 132. The ball plunger end 601 and the valve
tip 613 provide opposing forces.
[0237] In low-lift mode, the inner arm assembly 622 transmits the cam load 616 to the valve
tip 613, compresses spring 114 (of Figure 4), and opens the valve 112. In high-lift
mode, the outer arm 120, and the inner arm assembly 622 are latched together. In this
case, the outer arm 120 transmits the cam load 616 to the valve tip 613, compresses
the spring 114, and opens the valve 112.
[0238] Now, as to Figures 4 and 52, the total inertia for the rocker arm assembly 100 is
determined by the sum of the inertia of its major components, calculated as they rotate
about the ball plunger contact point 611. In the exemplary rocker arm assembly 100,
the major components may be defined as the torsion springs 134, 136, the inner arm
assembly 622, and the outer arm 120. When the total inertia increases, the dynamic
loading on the valve tip 613 increases, and system dynamic stability decreases. To
minimize valve tip loading and maximize dynamic stability, mass of the overall rocker
arm assembly 100 is biased towards the ball plunger contact point 611. The amount
of mass that can be biased is limited by the required stiffness of the rocker arm
assembly 100 needed for a given cam load 616, valve tip load 614, and ball plunger
load 615.
[0239] Now, as to Figures 4 and 52, the stiffness of the rocker arm assembly 100 is determined
by the combined stiffness of the inner arm assembly 622, and the outer arm 120, when
they are in a high-lift or low-lift state. Stiffness values for any given location
on the rocker arm assembly 100 can be calculated and visualized using Finite Element
Analysis (FEA) or other analytical methods, and characterized in a plot of stiffness
versus location along the measuring axis 618. In a similar manner, stiffness for the
outer arm 120 and inner arm assembly 622 can be individually calculated and visualized
using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) or other analytical methods. An exemplary illustration
106 shows the results of these analyses as a series characteristic plots of stiffness
versus location along the measuring axis 618. As an additional illustration noted
earlier, Figure 50 illustrates a plot of maximum deflection for the outer arm 120.
[0240] Now, referencing Figures 52 and 56, stress and deflection for any given location
on the rocker arm assembly 100 can be calculated using Finite Element Analysis (FEA)
or other analytical methods, and characterized as plots of stress and deflection versus
location along the measuring axis 618 for given cam load 616, valve tip load 614,
and ball plunger load 615. In a similar manner, stress and deflection for the outer
arm 120 and inner arm assembly 622 can be individually calculated and visualized using
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) or other analytical methods. An exemplary illustration
in Figure 56 shows the results of these analyses as a series of characteristic plots
of stress and deflection versus location along the measuring axis 618 for given cam
load 616, valve tip load 614, and ball plunger load 615.
4.7.2 DVVL ASSEMBLY DYNAMICS ANALYSIS
[0241] For stress and deflection analysis, a load case is described in terms of load location
and magnitude as illustrated in Figure 52. For example, in a latched rocker arm assembly
100 in high-lift mode, the cam load 616 is applied to slider pads 130, 132. The cam
load 616 is opposed by the valve tip load 614 and the ball plunger load 615. The first
distance 632 is the distance measured along the measuring axis 618 between the valve
tip load 614 and the ball plunger load 615. The second distance 634 is the distance
measured along the measuring axis 618 between the valve tip load 614 and the cam load
616. The load ratio is the second distance 634 divided by the first distance 632.
For dynamic analysis, multiple values and operating conditions are considered for
analysis and possible optimization. These may include the three lobe camshaft interface
parameters, torsion spring parameters, total mechanical lash, inertia, valve spring
parameters, and DFHLA parameters.
[0242] Design parameters for evaluation can be described:
Variable/ Parameter |
Description |
Value/Range for a Design Iteration |
Engine speed |
The maximum rotational speed of the rocker arm assembly 100 about the ball plunger
contact point 611 is derived from the engine speed |
7300 rpm in high-lift mode |
3500 rpm in low-lift mode |
Lash |
Lash enables switching from between high-lift and low-lift modes, and varies based
on the selected design. In the example configuration shown in Figure 52, a deflection
of the outer arm 120 slider pad results in a decrease of the total lash available
for switching. |
Cam lash |
Latch lash |
Total lash |
Maximum allowable deflection |
This value is based on the selected design configuration |
Total lash +/- tolerance |
Maximum allowable |
Establish allowable loading for the specified materials of construction. |
Kinematic contact stresses: |
Valve tip = |
stress |
|
Ball plunger end = |
Roller = 1200 ― 1400 MPa |
Slider pads = 800-1000 MPa |
Dynamic stability |
|
Valve closing velocity |
Cam shape |
The cam load 616 in Figure 52 is established by the rotating cam lobe as it acts to
open the valve. The shape of the cam lobe affects dynamic loading. |
This variable is considered fixed for iterative design analysis. |
Valve spring stiffness |
The spring 114 compression stiffness is fixed for a given engine design. |
|
Ball plunger to valve tip distance |
As described in Figure 52, the second distance 632 value is set by the engine design. |
Range = 20-50 mm |
Load ratio |
The load ratio as shown in Figure 52 is the second distance 634 divided by the first
distance 632. This value is imposed by the design configuration and load case selected. |
Range = 0.2 - 0.8 |
Inertia |
This is a calculated value |
Range = 20-60 Kg∗mm2 |
[0243] Now, as referenced by Figures 4, 51, 52, 53, and 54, based on given set of design
parameters, a general design methodology is described.
- 1. In step one 350, arrange components 622, 120, 134, and 136 along the measuring
axis to bias mass towards the ball plunger contact point 611. For example, the torsion
springs 134, 136 may be positioned 2 mm to the left of the ball plunger contact point,
and the pivot axle 118 in the inner arm assembly 622 may be positioned 5 mm. to the
right. The outer arm 120 is positioned to align with the pivot axle 118 as shown in
Figure 53.
- 2. In step 351, for a given component arrangement, calculate the total inertia for
the rocker arm assembly 100.
- 3. In step 352, evaluate the functionality of the component arrangement. For example,
confirm that the torsion springs 134, 136 can provide the required stiffness in their
specified location to keep the slider pads 130, 132 in contact with the cam 102, without
adding mass. In another example, the component arrangement must be determined to fit
within the package size constraints.
- 4. In step 353, evaluate the results of step 351 and step 352. If minimum requirements
for the valve tip load 614 and dynamic stability at the selected engine speed are
not met, iterate on the arrangement of components and perform the analyses in steps
351 and 352 again. When minimum requirements for the valve tip load 614 and dynamic
stability at the selected engine speed are met, calculate deflection and stress for
the rocker arm assembly 100.
- 5. In step 354, calculate stress and deflections
- 6. In step 356, evaluate deflection and stress. If minimum requirements for deflection
and stress are not met, proceed to step 355, and, and refine component design. When
the design iteration is complete, return to step 353 and re-evaluate the valve tip
load 614 and dynamic stability. When minimum requirements for the valve tip load 614
and dynamic stability at the selected engine speed are met, calculate deflection and
stress in step 354.
- 7. With reference to Figure 55, when conditions of stress, deflection, and dynamic
stability are met, the result is one possible design 357. Analysis results can be
plotted for possible design configurations on a graph of stiffness versus inertia.
This graph provides a range of acceptable values as indicated by area 360. Figure
57 shows three discrete acceptable designs. By extension, the acceptable inertia/stiffness
area 360 also bounds the characteristics for individual major components 120, 622,
and torsion springs 134, 136.
[0244] Now, with reference to Figures 4, 52, 55, a successful design, as described above,
is reached if each of the major rocker arm assembly 100 components, including the
outer arm 120, the inner arm assembly 622, and the torsion springs 134, 136, collectively
meet specific design criteria for inertia, stress, and deflection. A successful design
produces unique characteristic data for each major component.
[0245] To illustrate, select three functioning DVVL rocker arm assemblies 100, illustrated
in Figure 57, that meet a certain stiffness/inertia criteria. Each of these assemblies
is comprised of three major components: the torsion springs 134, 136, outer arm 120,
and inner arm assembly 622. For this analysis, as illustrated in an exemplary illustration
of Figure 58, a range of possible inertia values for each major component can be described:
- Torsion spring set, design #1, inertia = A; torsion spring set, design #2, inertia
= B; torsion spring set, design #3, inertia = C
- Torsion spring set inertia range, calculated about the ball end plunger tip (also
indicated with an X in Figure 59), is bounded by the extents defined in values A,
B, and C.
- Outer arm, design #1, inertia = D; outer arm, design #2, inertia = E; outer arm, design
#3, inertia = F
- Outer arm inertia range, calculated about the ball end plunger tip (also indicated
with an X in Figure 59), is bounded by the extents defined in values D, E, and F
- Inner arm assembly, design #1, inertia = X; inner arm assembly, design #2, inertia
= Y; inner arm assembly, design #3, inertia = Z
- Inner arm assembly inertia range, calculated about the ball end plunger tip (also
indicated with an X in Figure 59), is bounded by the extents defined in values X,
Y, and Z.
[0246] This range of component inertia values in turn produces a unique arrangement of major
components (torsion springs, outer arm, and inner arm assembly). For example, in this
design, the torsion springs will tend to be very close to the ball end plunger tip
611.
[0247] As to Figures 57-61, calculation of inertia for individual components is closely
tied to loading requirements in the assembly, because the desire to minimize inertia
requires the optimization of mass distribution in the part to manage stress in key
areas. For each of the three successful designs described above, a range of values
for stiffness and mass distribution can be described.
- For outer arm 120 design #1, mass distribution can be plotted versus distance along
the part, starting at end A, and proceeding to end B. In the same way, mass distribution
values for outer arm 120 design #2 and outer arm 120 design #3 can be plotted.
- The area between the two extreme mass distribution curves can be defined as a range
of values characteristic to the outer arm 120 in this assembly.
- For outer arm 120 design #1, stiffness distribution can be plotted versus distance
along the part, starting at end A, and proceeding to end B. In the same way, stiffness
values for outer arm 120 design #2 and outer arm 120 design #3 can be plotted.
- The area between the two extreme stiffness distribution curves can be defined as a
range of values characteristic to the outer arm 120 in this assembly.
[0248] Stiffness and mass distribution for the outer arm 120 along an axis related to its
motion and orientation during operation, describe characteristic values, and by extension,
characteristic shapes.
5 DESIGN VERIFICATION
5.1 LATCH RESPONSE
[0249] Latch response times for the exemplary DVVL system were validated with a latch response
test stand 900 illustrated in Figure 62, to ensure that the rocker arm assembly switched
within the prescribed mechanical switching window explained previously, and illustrated
in Figure 26. Response times were recorded for oil temperatures ranging from 10°C
to 120°C to effect a change in oil viscosity with temperature.
[0250] The latch response test stand 900 utilized production intent hardware including OCVs,
DFHLAs, and DVVL switching rocker arms 100. To simulate engine oil conditions, the
oil temperature was controlled by an external heating and cooling system. Oil pressure
was supplied by an external pump and controlled with a regulator. Oil temperature
was measured in a control gallery between the OCV and DFHLA. The latch movement was
measured with a displacement transducer 901.
[0251] Latch response times were measured with a variety of production intent SRFFs. Tests
were conducted with production intent 5w-20 motor oil. Response times were recorded
when switching from low lift mode to high lift and high lift mode to low lift mode.
[0252] Figure 21 details the latch response times when switching from low-lift mode to high-lift
mode. The maximum response time at 20°C was measured to be less than 10 milliseconds.
Figure 22 details the mechanical response times when switching from high-lift mode
to low lift mode. The maximum response time at 20°C was measured to be less than 10
milliseconds.
[0253] Results from the switching studies show that the switching time for the latch is
primarily a function of the oil temperature due to the change in viscosity of the
oil. The slope of the latch response curve resembles viscosity to temperature relationships
of motor oil.
[0254] The switching response results show that the latch movement is fast enough for mode
switching in one camshaft revolution up to 3500 engine rpm. The response time begins
to increase significantly as the temperature falls below 20°C. At temperatures of
10°C and below, switching in one camshaft revolution is not possible without lowering
the 3500 rpm switching requirement.
[0255] The SRFF was designed to be robust at high engine speeds for both high and low lift
modes as shown in Table 1. The high lift mode can operate up to 7300 rpm with a "burst"
speed requirement of 7500 rpm. A burst is defined as a short excursion to a higher
engine speed. The SRFF is normally latched in high lift mode such that high lift mode
is not dependent on oil temperature. The low lift operating mode is focused on fuel
economy during part load operation up to 3500 rpm with an over speed requirement of
5000 rpm in addition to a burst speed to 7500 rpm. As tested, the system is able to
hydraulically unlatch the SRFF for oil temperatures at 200C or above. Testing was
conducted down to 10°C to ensure operation at 20°C. Durability results show that the
design is robust across the entire operating range of engine speeds, lift modes and
oil temperatures.
Table 1
Mode |
Engine Speed, rpm |
Oil Temperature |
High Lift |
7300 |
N/A |
7500 burst speed |
Low Lift (Fuel Economy Mode) |
3500 |
20°C and above |
5000 overspeed |
7500 burst speed |
[0256] The design, development, and validation of a SRFF based DVVL system to achieve early
intake valve closing was completed for a Type II valve train. This DVVL system improves
fuel economy without jeopardizing performance by operating in two modes. Pumping loop
losses are reduced in low lift mode by closing the intake valve early while performance
is maintained in high lift mode by utilizing a standard intake valve profile. The
system preserves common Type II intake and exhaust valve train geometries for use
in an in-line four cylinder gasoline engine. Implementation cost is minimized by using
common components and a standard chain drive system. Utilizing a Type II SRFF based
system in this manner allows the application of this hardware to multiple engine families.
[0257] This DVVL system, installed on the intake of the valve train, met key performance
targets for mode switching and dynamic stability in both high-lift and low-lift modes.
Switching response times allowed mode switching within one cam revolution at oil temperatures
above 20°C and engine speeds up to 3500 rpm. Optimization of the SRFF stiffness and
inertia, combined with an appropriate valve lift profile design allowed the system
to be dynamically stable to 3500 rpm in low lift mode and 7300 rpm in high lift mode.
The validation testing completed on production intent hardware shows that the DVVL
system exceeds durability targets. Accelerated system aging tests were utilized to
demonstrate durability beyond the life targets.
5.2 DURABILITY
[0258] Passenger cars are required to meet an emissions useful life requirement of 150,000
miles. This study set a more stringent target of 200,000 miles to ensure that the
product is robust well beyond the legislated requirement.
[0259] The valve train requirements for end of life testing are translated to the 200,000
mile target. This mileage target must be converted to valve actuation events to define
the valve train durability requirements. In order to determine the number of valve
events, the average vehicle and engine speeds over the vehicle lifetime must be assumed.
For this example, an average vehicle speed of 40 miles per hour combined with an average
engine speed of 2200 rpm was chosen for the passenger car application. The camshaft
speed operates at half the engine speed and the valves are actuated once per camshaft
revolution, resulting in a test requirement of 330 million valve events. Testing was
conducted on both firing engines and non-firing fixtures. Rather than running a 5000
hour firing engine test, most testing and reported results focus on the use of the
non-firing fixture illustrated in Figure 63 to conduct testing necessary to meet 330
million valve events. Results from firing and non-firing tests were compared, and
the results corresponded well with regarding valve train wear results, providing credibility
for non-firing fixture life testing.
5.2.1 ACCELERATED AGING
[0260] There was a need for conducting an accelerated test to show compliance over multiple
engine lives prior to running engine tests. Hence, fixture testing was performed prior
to firing tests. A higher speed test was designed to accelerate valve train wear such
that it could be completed in less time. A test correlation was established such that
doubling the average engine speed relative to the in-use speed yielded results in
approximately one-quarter of the time and nearly equivalent valve train wear. As a
result, valve train wear followed closely to the following equation:
[0261] Where VE
Accel are the valve events required during an accelerated aging test, VE
in-use are the valve events required during normal in-use testing, RPM
avg-test is the average engine speed for the accelerated test and RPM
avg-in use is the average engine speed for in-use testing.
[0262] A proprietary, high speed, durability test cycle was developed that had an average
engine speed of approximately 5000 rpm. Each cycle had high speed durations in high
lift mode of approximately 60 minutes followed by lower speed durations in low lift
mode for approximately another 10 minutes. This cycle was repeated 430 times to achieve
72 million valve events at an accelerated wear rate that is equivalent to 330 million
events at standard load levels. Standard valve train products containing needle and
roller bearings have been used successfully in the automotive industry for years.
This test cycle focused on the DLC coated slider pads where approximately 97% of the
valve lift events were on the slider pads in high lift mode leaving 2 million cycles
on the low lift roller bearing as shown in Table 2. These testing conditions consider
one valve train life equivalent to 430 accelerated test cycles. Testing showed that
the SRFF is durable through six engine useful lives with negligible wear and lash
variation.
Table 2: Durability Tests, Valve Events and Objectives
Durability Test |
Duration (hours) |
Valve Events |
Objective |
total |
high lift |
Accelerated System Aging |
500 |
72M |
97% |
Accelerated high speed wear |
Switching |
500 |
54M |
50% |
Latch and torsion spring wear |
Critical Shift |
800 |
42M |
50% |
Lath and bearing wear |
Idle 1 |
1000 |
27M |
100% |
Low lubrication |
Idle 2 |
1000 |
27M |
0% |
Low lubrication |
Cold Start |
1000 |
27M |
100% |
Low lubrication |
Used Oil |
400 |
56M |
∼99.5% |
Accelerated high speed wear |
Bearing |
140 |
N/A |
N/A |
Bearing wear |
Torsion Spring |
500 |
25M |
0% |
Spring load loss |
[0263] The accelerated system aging test was key to showing durability while many function-specific
tests were also completed to show robustness over various operating states.
[0264] Table 2 includes the main durability tests combined with the objective for each test.
The accelerated system aging test was described above showing approximately 500 hours
or approximately 430 test cycles. A switching test was operated for approximately
500 hours to assess the latch and torsion spring wear. Likewise, a critical shift
test was also performed to further age the parts during a harsh and abusive shift
from the outer arm being partially latched such that it would slip to the low lift
mode during the high lift event. A critical shift test was conducted to show robustness
in the case of extreme conditions caused by improper vehicle maintenance. This critical
shift testing was difficult to achieve and required precise oil pressure control in
the test laboratory to partially latch the outer arm. This operation is not expected
in-use as the oil control pressures are controlled outside of that window. Multiple
idle tests combined with cold start operation were conducted to accelerate wear due
to low oil lubrication. A used oil test was also conducted at high speed. Finally,
bearing and torsion spring tests were conducted to ensure component durability. All
tests met the engine useful lift requirement of 200,000 miles which is safely above
the 150,000 mile passenger car useful life requirement.
[0265] All durability tests were conducted having specific levels of oil aeration. Most
tests had oil aeration levels ranging between approximately 15% and 20% total gas
content (TGC) which is typical for passenger car applications. This content varied
with engine speed and the levels were quantified from idle to 7500 rpm engine speed.
An excessive oil aeration test was also conducted having aeration levels of 26% TGC.
These tests were conducted with SRFF's that met were tested for dynamics and switching
performance tests. Details of the dynamics performance test are discussed in the results
section. The oil aeration levels and extended levels were conducted to show product
robustness.
5.2.2 DURABILITY TEST APPARATUS
[0266] The durability test stand shown in Figure 63 consists of a prototype 2.5 L four cylinder
engine driven by an electric motor with an external engine oil temperature control
system 905. Camshaft position is monitored by an Accu-coder 802S external encoder
902 driven by the crankshaft. Angular velocity of the crankshaft is measured with
a digital magnetic speed sensor (model Honeywell584) 904. Oil pressure in both the
control and hydraulic galleries is monitored using Kulite XTL piezoelectric pressure
transducers.
5.2.3 DURABILITY TEST APPARATUS CONTROL
[0267] A control system for the fixture is configured to command engine speed, oil temperature
and valve lift state as well as verify that the intended lift function is met. The
performance of the valve train is evaluated by measuring valve displacement using
non-intrusive Bentley Nevada 3300XL proximity probes 906. The proximity probes measure
valve lift up to 2 mm at one-half camshaft degree resolution. This provides the information
necessary to confirm the valve lift state and post process the data for closing velocity
and bounce analysis. The test setup included a valve displacement trace that was recorded
at idle speed to represent the baseline conditions of the SRFF and is used to determine
the master profile 908 shown in Figure 64.
[0268] Figure 17 shows the system diagnostic window representing one switching cycle for
diagnosing valve closing displacement. The OCV is commanded by the control system
resulting in movement of the OCV armature as represented by the OCV current trace
881. The pressure downstream of the OCV in the oil control gallery increases as shown
by the pressure curve 880; thus, actuating the latch pin resulting in a change of
state from high-lift to low-lift.
[0269] Figure 64 shows the valve closing tolerance 909 in relation to the master profile
908 that was experimentally determined. The proximity probes 906 used were calibrated
to measure the last 2 mm of lift, with the final 1.2 mm of travel shown on the vertical
axis in Figure 64. A camshaft angle tolerance of 2.5" was established around the master
profile 908 to allow for the variation in lift that results from valve train compression
at high engine speeds to prevent false fault recording. A detection window was established
to resolve whether or not the valve train system had the intended deflection. For
example, a sharper than intended valve closing would result in an earlier camshaft
angle closing resulting in valve bounce due to excessive velocity which is not desired.
The detection window and tolerance around the master profile can detect these anomalies.
5.2.4 DURABILITY TEST PLAN
[0270] A Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) was conducted to determine the
SRFF failure modes. Likewise, mechanisms were determined at the system and subsystem
levels. This information was used to develop and evaluate the durability of the SRFF
to different operating conditions. The test types were separated into four categories
as shown in Figure 65 that include: Performance Verification, Subsystem Testing, Extreme
Limit Testing and Accelerated System Aging.
[0271] The hierarchy of key tests for durability are shown in Figure 65. Performance Verification
Testing benchmarks the performance of the SRFF to application requirements and is
the first step in durability verification. Subsystem tests evaluate particular functions
and wear interfaces over the product lifecycle. Extreme Limit Testing subjects the
SRFF to the severe user in combination with operation limits. Finally, the Accelerated
Aging test is a comprehensive test evaluating the SRFF holistically. The success of
these tests demonstrates the durability of the SRFF.
PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION
Fatigue & Stiffness
[0272] The SRFF is placed under a cyclic load test to ensure fatigue life exceeds application
loads by a significant design margin. Valve train performance is largely dependent
on the stiffness of the system components. Rocker arm stiffness is measured to validate
the design and ensure acceptable dynamic performance.
Valve train Dynamics
[0273] The Valve train Dynamics test description and performance is discussed in the results
section. The test involved strain gaging the SRFF combined with measuring valve closing
velocities.
SUBSYSTEM TESTING
Switching Durability
[0274] The switching durability test evaluates the switching mechanism by cycling the SRFF
between the latched, unlatched and back to the latched state a total of three million
times (Figure 24 and 25). The primary purpose of the test is the evaluation of the
latching mechanism. Additional durability information is gained regarding the torsion
springs due to 50% of the test cycle being in low lift.
Torsion Spring Durability and Fatigue
[0275] The torsion spring is an integral component of the switching roller finger follower.
The torsion spring allows the outer arm to operate in lost motion while maintaining
contact with the high lift camshaft lobe. The Torsion Spring Durability test is performed
to evaluate the durability of the torsion springs at operational loads. The Torsion
Spring Durability test is conducted with the torsion springs installed in the SRFF.
The Torsion Spring Fatigue test evaluates the torsion spring fatigue life at elevated
stress levels. Success is defined as torsion spring load loss of less than 15% at
end-of-life.
Idle Speed Durability
[0276] The Idle Speed Durability test simulates a limit lubrication condition caused by
low oil pressure and high oil temperature. The test is used to evaluate the slider
pad and bearing, valve tip to valve pallet and ball socket to ball plunger wear. The
lift-state is held constant throughout the test in either high or low lift. The total
mechanical lash is measured at periodic inspection intervals and is the primary measure
of wear.
EXTREME LIMIT TESTING
Overspeed
[0277] Switching rocker arm failure modes include loss of lift-state control. The SRFF is
designed to operate at a maximum crankshaft speed of 3500 rpm in low lift mode. The
SRFF includes design protection to these higher speeds in the case of unexpected malfunction
resulting in low lift mode. Low lift fatigue life tests were performed at 5000 rpm.
Engine Burst tests were performed to 7500 rpm for both high and low lift states.
Cold Start Durability
[0278] The Cold Start durability test evaluates the ability of the DLC to withstand 300
engine starting cycles from an initial temperature of -30°C. Typically, cold weather
engine starting at these temperatures would involve an engine block heater. This extreme
test was chosen to show robustness and was repeated 300 times on a motorized engine
fixture. This test measures the ability of the DLC coating to withstand reduced lubrication
as a result of low temperatures.
Critical Shift Durability
[0279] The SRFF is designed to switch on the base circle of the camshaft while the latch
pin is not in contact with the outer arm. In the event of improper OCV timing or lower
than required minimum control gallery oil pressure for full pin travel, the pin may
still be moving at the start of the next lift event. The improper location of the
latch pin may lead to a partial engagement between the latch pin and outer arm. In
the event of a partial engagement between the outer arm and latch pin, the outer arm
may slip off the latch pin resulting in an impact between the roller bearing and low
lift camshaft lobe. The Critical Shift Durability is an abuse test that creates conditions
to quantify robustness and is not expected in the life of the vehicle. The Critical
Shift test subjects the SRFF to 5000 critical shift events.
Accelerated Bearing Endurance
[0280] The accelerated bearing endurance is a life test used to evaluate life of bearings
that completed the critical shift test. The test is used to determine whether the
effects of critical shift testing will shorten the life of the roller bearing. The
test is operated at increased radial loads to reduce the time to completion. New bearings
were tested simultaneously to benchmark the performance and wear of the bearings subjected
to critical shift testing. Vibration measurements were taken throughout the test and
were analyzed to detect inception of bearing damage.
Used Oil Testing
[0281] The Accelerated System Aging test and Idle Speed Durability test profiles were performed
with used oil that had a 20/19/16 ISO rating. This oil was taken from engines at the
oil change interval.
ACCELERATED SYSTEM AGING
[0282] The Accelerated System Aging test is intended to evaluate the overall durability
of the rocker arm including the sliding interface between the camshaft and SRFF, latching
mechanism and the low lift bearing. The mechanical lash was measured at periodic inspection
intervals and is the primary measure of wear. Figure 66 shows the test protocol in
evaluating the SRFF over an Accelerated System Aging test cycle. The mechanical lash
measurements and FTIR measurements allow investigation of the overall health of the
SRFF and the DLC coating respectively. Finally, the part is subjected to a teardown
process in an effort to understand the source of any change in mechanical lash from
the start of test.
[0283] Figure 67 is a pie chart showing the relative testing time for the SRFF durability
testing which included approximately 15,700 total hours. The Accelerated System Aging
test offered the most information per test hour due to the acceleration factor and
combined load to the SRFF within one test leading to the 37% allotment of total testing
time. The Idle Speed Durability (Low Speed, Low Lift and Low Speed, High Lift) tests
accounted for 29% of total testing time due to the long duration of each test. Switching
Durability was tested to multiple lives and constituted 9% of total test time. Critical
Shift Durability and Cold Start Durability testing required significant time due to
the difficulty in achieving critical shifts and thermal cycling time required for
the Cold Start Durability. The data is quantified in terms of the total time required
to conduct these modes as opposed to just the critical shift and cold starting time
itself. The remainder of the subsystem and extreme limit tests required 11% of the
total test time.
VALVETRAIN DYNAMICS
[0284] Valve train dynamic behavior determines the performance and durability of an engine.
Dynamic performance was determined by evaluating the closing velocity and bounce of
the valve as it returns to the valve seat. Strain gaging provides information about
the loading of the system over the engine speed envelope with respect to camshaft
angle. Strain gages are applied to the inner and outer arms at locations of uniform
stress. Figure 68 shows a strain gage attached to the SRFF. The outer and inner arms
were instrumented to measure strain for the purpose of verifying the amount of load
on the SRFF.
[0285] A Valve train Dynamics test was conducted to evaluate the performance capabilities
of the valve train. The test was performed at nominal and limit total mechanical lash
values. The nominal case is presented. A speed sweep from 1000 to 7500 rpm was performed,
recording 30 valve events per engine speed. Post processing of the dynamics data allows
calculation of valve closing velocity and valve bounce. The attached strain gages
on the inner and outer arms of the SRFF indicate sufficient loading of the rocker
arm at all engine speeds to prevent separation between valve train components or "pump-up"
of the HLA. Pump-up occurs when the HLA compensates for valve bounce or valve train
deflection causing the valve to remain open on the camshaft base circle. The minimum,
maximum and mean closing velocities are shown to understand the distribution over
the engine speed range. The high lift closing velocities are presented in Figure 67.
The closing velocities for high lift meet the design targets. The span of values varies
by approximately 250 mm/s between the minimum and maximum at 7500 rpm while safely
staying within the target.
[0286] Figure 69 shows the closing velocity of the low lift camshaft profile. Normal operation
occurs up to 3500 rpm where the closing velocities remain below 200 mm/s, which is
safely within the design margin for low lift. The system was designed to an over-speed
condition of 5000 rpm in low lift mode where the maximum closing velocity is below
the limit. Valve closing velocity design targets are met for both high and low lift
modes.
CRITICAL SHIFT
[0287] The Critical Shift test is performed by holding the latch pin at the critical point
of engagement with the outer arm as shown in Figure 27. The latch is partially engaged
on the outer arm which presents the opportunity for the outer arm to disengage from
the latch pin resulting in a momentary loss of control of the rocker arm. The bearing
of the inner arm is impacted against the low lift camshaft lobe. The SRFF is tested
to a quantity that far exceeds the number of critical shifts that are anticipated
in a vehicle to show lifetime SRFF robustness. The Critical Shift test evaluates the
latching mechanism for wear during latch disengagement as well as the bearing durability
from the impact that occurs during a critical shift.
[0288] The Critical Shift test was performed using a motorized engine similar to that shown
in Figure 63. The lash adjuster control gallery was regulated about the critical pressure.
The engine is operated at a constant speed and the pressure is varied around the critical
pressure to accommodate for system hysteresis. A Critical Shift is defined as a valve
drop of greater than 1.0 mm. The valve drop height distribution of a typical SRFF
is shown in Figure 70. It should be noted that over 1000 Critical Shifts occurred
at less than 1.0 mm which are tabulated but not counted towards test completion. Figure
71 displays the distribution of critical shifts with respect to camshaft angle. The
largest accumulation occurs immediately beyond peak lift with the remainder approximately
evenly distributed.
[0289] The latching mechanism and bearing are monitored for wear throughout the test. The
typical wear of the outer arm (Figure 73) is compared to a new part (Figure 72). Upon
completion of the required critical shifts, the rocker arm is checked for proper operation
and the test concluded. The edge wear shown did not have a significant effect on the
latching function and the total mechanical lash as the majority of the latch shelf
displayed negligible wear.
SUBSYSTEMS
[0290] The subsystem tests evaluate particular functions and wear interfaces of the SRFF
rocker arm. Switching Durability evaluates the latching mechanism for function and
wear over the expected life of the SRFF. Similarly, Idle Speed Durability subjects
the bearing and slider pad to a worst case condition including both low lubrication
and an oil temperature of 130°C. The Torsion Spring Durability Test was accomplished
by subjecting the torsion springs to approximately 25 million cycles. Torsion spring
loads are measured throughout the test to measure degradation. Further confidence
was gained by extending the test to 100 million cycles while not exceeding the maximum
design load loss of 15%. Figure 74 displays the torsion spring loads on the outer
arm at start and end of test. Following 100 million cycles, there was a small load
loss on the order of 5% to 10% which is below the 15% acceptable target and shows
sufficient loading of the outer arm to four engine lives.
ACCELERATED SYSTEM AGING
[0291] The Accelerated System Aging test is the comprehensive durability test used as the
benchmark of sustained performance. The test represents the cumulative damage of the
severe end-user. The test cycle averages approximately 5000 rpm with constant speed
and acceleration profiles. The time per cycle is broken up as follows: 28% steady
state, 15% low lift and cycling between high and low lift with the remainder under
acceleration conditions. The results of testing show that the lash change in one-life
of testing accounts for 21% of the available wear specification of the rocker arm.
Accelerated System Aging test, consisting of 8 SRFF's, was extended out past the standard
life to determine wear out modes of the SRFF. Total mechanical lash measurements were
recorded every 100 test cycles once past the standard duration.
[0292] The results of the accelerated system aging measurements are presented in Figure
75 showing that the wear specification was exceeded at 3.6 lives. The test was continued
and achieved six lives without failure. Extending the test to multiple lives displayed
a linear change in mechanical lash once past an initial break in period. The dynamic
behavior of the system degraded due to the increased total mechanical lash; nonetheless,
functional performance remained intact at six engine lives.
5.2.5 DURABILITY TEST RESULTS
[0293] Each of the tests discussed in the test plan were performed and a summary of the
results are presented. The results of Valve train Dynamics, Critical Shift Durability,
Torsion Spring Durability and finally the Accelerated System Aging test are shown.
[0294] The SRFF was subjected to accelerated aging tests combined with function-specific
tests to demonstrate robustness and is summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Durability Summary
Durability Test |
Lifetimes |
Cycles |
Valve Events |
total |
# tests |
Accelerated System Aging |
6 |
|
|
|
Switching |
1 (used oil) |
|
|
|
Torsion Spring |
3 |
|
|
|
Critical Shift |
4 |
|
|
|
Cold Start |
>1 |
|
|
|
Overspeed (5000 rpm in low lift) |
>1 |
|
|
|
Overspeed (7500 rpm in high lift) |
>1 |
|
|
|
Bearing |
|
|
100M |
1 |
Idle low lift |
|
|
27M |
2 |
Idle high lift |
>1 |
|
27M |
2 |
>1 (dirty oil) |
|
27M |
1 |
Legend: 1 engine lifetime = 200,000 miles (safe margin over the 150,000 mile requirement) |
[0295] Durability was assessed in terms of engine lives totaling an equivalent 200,000 miles
which provides substantial margin over the mandated 150,000 mile requirement. The
goal of the project was to demonstrate that all tests show at least one engine life.
The main durability test was the accelerated system aging test that exhibited durability
to at least six engine lives or 1.2 million miles. This test was also conducted with
used oil showing robustness to one engine life. A key operating mode is switching
operation between high and low lift. The switching durability test exhibited at least
three engine lives or 600,000 miles. Likewise, the torsion spring was robust to at
least four engine lives or 800,000 miles. The remaining tests were shown to at least
one engine life for critical shifts, over speed, cold start, bearing robustness and
idle conditions. The DLC coating was robust to all conditions showing polishing with
minimal wear, as shown in Figure 76. As a result, the SRFF was tested extensively
showing robustness well beyond a 200,000 mile useful life.
5.2.6 DURABILITY TEST CONCLUSIONS
[0296] The DVVL system including the SRFF, DFHLA and OCV was shown to be robust to at least
200,000 miles which is a safe margin beyond the 150,000 mile mandated requirement.
The durability testing showed accelerated system aging to at least six engine lives
or 1.2 million miles. This SRFF was also shown to be robust to used oil as well as
aerated oil. The switching function of the SRFF was shown robust to at least three
engine lives or 600,000 miles. All sub-system tests show that the SRFF was robust
beyond one engine life of 200,000 miles.
[0297] Critical shift tests demonstrated robustness to 5000 events or at least one engine
life. This condition occurs at oil pressure conditions outside of the normal operating
range and causes a harsh event as the outer arm slips off the latch such that the
SRFF transitions to the inner arm. Even though the condition is harsh, the SRFF was
shown robust to this type of condition. It is unlikely that this event will occur
in serial production. Testing results show that the SRFF is robust to this condition
in the case that a critical shift occurs.
[0298] The SRFF was proven robust for passenger car application having engine speeds up
to 7300 rpm and having burst speed conditions to 7500 rpm. The firing engine tests
had consistent wear patterns to the non-firing engine tests described in this paper.
The DLC coating on the outer arm slider pads was shown to be robust across all operating
conditions. As a result, the SRFF design is appropriate for four cylinder passenger
car applications for the purpose of improving fuel economy via reduced engine pumping
losses at part load engine operation. This technology could be extended to other applications
including six cylinder engines. The SRFF was shown to be robust in many cases that
far exceeded automotive requirements. Diesel applications could be considered with
additional development to address increased engine loads, oil contamination and lifetime
requirements.
5.3 SLIDER PAD/DLC COATING WEAR
5.3.1 WEAR TEST PLAN
[0299] This section describes the test plan utilized to investigate the wear characteristics
and durability of the DLC coating on the outer arm slider pad. The goal was to establish
relationships between design specifications and process parameters and how each affected
the durability of the sliding pad interface. Three key elements in this sliding interface
are: the camshaft lobe, the slider pad, and the valve train loads. Each element has
factors which needed to be included in the test plan to determine the effect on the
durability of the DLC coating. Detailed descriptions for each component follow:
[0300] Camshaft - The width of the high lift camshaft lobes were specified to ensure the
slider pad stayed within the camshaft lobe during engine operation. This includes
axial positional changes resulting from thermal growth or dimensional variation due
to manufacturing. As a result, the full width of the slider pad could be in contact
with the camshaft lobe without risk of the camshaft lobe becoming offset to the slider
pad. The shape of the lobe (profile) pertaining to the valve lift characteristics
had also been established in the development of the camshaft and SRFF. This left two
factors which needed to be understood relative to the durability of the DLC coating;
the first was lobe material and the second was the surface finish of the camshaft
lobe. The test plan included cast iron and steel camshaft lobes tested with different
surface conditions on the lobe. The first included the camshafts lobes as prepared
by a grinding operation (as-ground). The second was after a polishing operation improved
the surface finish condition of the lobes (polished).
[0301] Slider Pad - The slider pad profile was designed to specific requirements for valve
lift and valve train dynamics. Figure 77 is a graphic representation of the contact
relationship between the slider pads on the SRFF and the contacting high lift lobe
pair. Due to expected manufacturing variations, there is an angular alignment relationship
in this contacting surface which is shown in the Figure 77 in exaggerated scale. The
crowned surface reduces the risk of edge loading the slider pads considering various
alignment conditions. However, the crowned surface adds manufacturing complexity,
so the effect of crown on the coated interface performance was added to the test plan
to determine its necessity.
[0302] The Figure 77 shows the crown option on the camshaft surface as that was the chosen
method. Hertzian stress calculations based on expected loads and crown variations
were used for guidance in the test plan. A tolerance for the alignment between the
two pads (included angle) needed to be specified in conjunction with the expected
crown variation. The desired output of the testing was a practical understanding of
how varying degrees of slider pad alignment affected the DLC coating. Stress calculations
were used to provide a target value of misalignment of 0.2 degrees. These calculations
served only as a reference point. The test plan incorporated three values for included
angles between the slider pads: <0.05 degrees, 0.2 degrees and 0.4 degrees. Parts
with included angles below 0.05 degrees are considered flat and parts with 0.4 degrees
represent a doubling of the calculated reference point.
[0303] The second factor on the slider pads which required evaluation was the surface finish
of the slider pads before DLC coating. The processing steps of the slider pad included
a grinding operation which formed the profile of the slider pad and a polishing step
to prepare the surface for the DLC coating. Each step influenced the final surface
finish of the slider pad before DLC coating was applied. The test plan incorporated
the contribution of each step and provided results to establish an in-process specification
for grinding and a final specification for surface finish after the polishing step.
The test plan incorporated the surface finish as ground and after polish.
[0304] Valve train load - The last element was the loading of the slider pad by operation
of the valve train. Calculations provided a means to transform the valve train loads
into stress levels. The durability of both the camshaft lobe and the DLC coating was
based on the levels of stress each could withstand before failure. The camshaft lobe
material should be specified in the range of 800-1000 MPa (kinematic contact stress).
This range was considered the nominal design stress. In order to accelerate testing,
the levels of stress in the test plan were set at 900-1000 MPa and 1125-1250 MPa.
These values represent the top half of the nominal design stress and 125% of the design
stress respectively.
[0305] The test plan incorporated six factors to investigate the durability of the DLC coating
on the slider pads: (1) the camshaft lobe material, (2) the form of the camshaft lobe,
(3) the surface conditions of the camshaft lobe, (4) the angular alignment of the
slider pad to the camshaft lobe, {S} the surface finish of the slider pad and (6)
the stress applied to the coated slider pad by opening the valve. A summary of the
elements and factors outlined in this section is shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Test Plan Elements and Factors
Element |
Factor |
Camshaft |
Material: Cast Iron, steel |
Surface Finish: as ground, polished |
Lobe Form: Flat, Crowned |
Slider Pad |
Angular Alignment:<0.05, 0.2, 0.4 degrees |
Surface Finish: as ground, polished |
Valvetain Load |
Stress Level: Max Design, 125% Max Design |
5.3.2 COMPONENT WEAR TEST RESULTS
[0306] The goal of testing was to determine relative contribution each of the factors had
on the durability of the slider pad DLC coating. The majority of the test configurations
included a minimum of two factors from the test plan. The slider pads 752 were attached
to a support rocker 753 on a test coupon 751 shown in Figure 78. All the configurations
were tested at the two stress levels to allow for a relative comparison of each of
the factors. Inspection intervals ranged from 20-50 hours at the start of testing
and increased to 300-500 hour intervals as results took longer to observe. Testing
was suspended when the coupons exhibited loss of the DLC coating or there was a significant
change in the surface of the camshaft lobe. The testing was conducted at stress levels
higher than the application required hastening the effects of the factors. As a result,
the engine life assessment described is a conservative estimate and was used to demonstrate
the relative effect of the tested factors. Samples completing one life on the test
stand were described as adequate. Samples exceeding three lives without DLC loss were
considered excellent. The test results were separated into two sections to facilitate
discussion. The first section discusses results from the cast iron camshafts and the
second examines results from the steel camshafts.
Test Results for Cast Iron Camshafts
[0307] The first tests utilized cast iron camshaft lobes and compared slider pad surface
finish and two angular alignment configurations. The results are shown in Table 2
below. This table summarizes the combinations of slider pad included angle and surface
conditions tested with the cast iron camshafts. Each combination was tested at the
max: design and 125% max design load condition. The values listed represent the number
of engine lives each combination achieved during testing.
Table 2: Cast Iron Test Matrix and Results
Cast Iron Camshaft |
Lobe Surface Finish |
Ground |
|
Lobe Profile |
Flat |
|
|
Slider Pad Configuration |
0.2 deg. |
Ground |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Engine Lives |
Polished |
0.5 |
0.3 |
|
Flat |
Ground |
0.3 |
0.2 |
|
|
Polished |
0.75 |
0.4 |
|
Included Angle |
Surface Preparation |
Max Design |
125% Max Design |
|
|
|
|
Valvetrain Load |
|
[0308] The camshafts from the tests all developed spalling which resulted in the termination
of the tests. The majority developed spalling before half an engine life. The spalling
was more severe on the higher load parts but also present on the max design load parts.
Analysis revealed both loads exceeded the capacity of the camshaft. Cast iron camshaft
lobes are commonly utilized in applications with rolling elements containing similar
load levels; however, in this sliding interface, the material was not a suitable choice.
[0309] The inspection intervals were frequent enough to study the effect the surface finish
had on the durability of the coating. The coupons with the as-ground surface finish
suffered DLC coating loss very early in the testing. The coupon shown in Figure 79A
illustrates a typical sample of the DLC coating loss early in the test.
[0310] Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis revealed the fractured nature of the
DLC coating. The metal surface below the DLC coating did not offer sufficient support
to the coating. The coating is significantly harder than the metal to which it is
bonded; thus, if the base metal significantly deforms the DLC may fracture as a result.
The coupons that were polished before coating performed well until the camshaft lobes
started to spall. The best result for the cast iron camshafts was 0.75 lives with
the combination of the flat, polished coupons at the max design load.
Test Results for Steel Camshafts
[0311] The next set of tests incorporated the steel lobe camshafts. A summary of the test
combinations and results is listed in Table 3. The camshaft lobes were tested with
four different configurations: (1) surface finish as ground with flat lobes, (2) surface
finish as ground with crowned lobes, (3) polished with minimum crowned lobes and (4)
polished with nominal crown on the lobes. The slider pads on the coupons were polished
before DLC coating and tested at three angles: (1) flat (less than 0.05 degrees of
included angle), (2) 0.2 degrees of included angle and (3) 0.4 degrees of included
angle. The loads for all the camshafts were set at max design or 125% of the max design
level
Table 3: Steel Camshaft Test Matrix and Results
Lobe Surface Finish |
Ground |
Polished |
|
Steel Camshaft |
Lobe Profile |
Flat |
Crown |
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
Nominal |
Slider Pad Configuration |
0.4 deg. |
Polished |
0.1 |
0.75 |
1.5 |
2.3 |
2.9 |
2.6 |
Engine Lives |
0.2 deg. |
Polished |
1.6 |
- |
3.3 |
2.8 |
3.1 |
3 |
Flat |
Polished |
- |
1.8 |
2.6 |
2.2 |
3.3 |
3 |
|
Included Angle |
Surface Preparation |
Max Design |
125% Max Design |
Max Design |
125% Max Design |
Max Design |
125% Max Design |
|
|
|
Valve train Load |
[0312] The test samples which incorporated as-ground flat steel camshaft lobes and 0.4 degree
included angle coupons at the 125% design load levels did not exceed one life. The
samples tested at the maximum design stress lasted one life but exhibited the same
effects on the coating. The 0.2 degree and flat samples performed better but did not
exceed two lives.
[0313] This test was followed with ground, flat, steel camshaft lobes and coupons with 0.2
degree included angle and flat coupons. The time required before observing coating
loss on the 0.2 degree samples was 1.6 lives. The flat coupons ran slightly longer
achieving 1.8 lives. The pattern of DLC loss on the flat samples was non-uniform with
the greatest losses on the outside of the contact patch. The loss of coating on the
outside of the contact patches indicated the stress experienced by the slider pad
was not uniform across its width. This phenomenon is known as "edge effect". The solution
for reducing the stress at the edges of two aligned elements is to add a crown profile
to one of the elements. The application utilizing the SRFF has the crowned profile
added to the camshaft.
[0314] The next set of tests incorporated the minimum value of crown combined with 0.4,
0.2 degree and flat polished slider pads. This set of tests demonstrated the positive
consequence of adding crown to the camshaft. The improvement in the 125% max load
was from 0.75 to 1.3 lives for the 0.4 degree samples. The flat parts exhibited a
smaller improvement from 1.8 to 2.2 lives for the same load.
[0315] The last set of tests included all three angles of coupons with polished steel camshaft
lobes machined with nominal crown values. The most notable difference in these results
is the interaction between camshaft crown and the angular alignment of the slider
pads to the camshaft lobe. The flat and 0.2 degree samples exceeded three lives at
both load levels. The 0.4 degree samples did not exceed two lives. Figure 79B shows
a typical example of one of the coupons tested at the max design load with 0.2 degrees
of included angle.
[0316] These results demonstrated the following: (1) the nominal value of camshaft crown
was effective in mitigating slider pad angular alignment up to 0.2 degrees to flat;
(2) the mitigation was effective at max design loads and 125% max design loads of
the intended application and, (3) polishing the camshaft lobes contributes to the
durability of the DLC coating when combined with slider pad polish and camshaft lobe
crown.
[0317] Each test result helped to develop a better understanding of the effect stress had
on the durability of the DLC coating. The results are plotted in Figure 80.
[0318] The early tests utilizing cast iron camshaft lobes did not exceed half an engine
life in a sliding interface at the design loads. The next improvement came in the
form of identifying 'edge effect'. The addition of crown to the polished camshaft
lobes combined with a better understanding of allowable angular alignment, improved
the coating durability to over three lives. The outcome is a demonstrated design margin
between the observed test results and the maximum design stress for the application
at each estimated engine life.
[0319] The effect surface finish has on DLC durability is most pronounced in the transition
from coated samples as-ground to coated coupons as-polished. Slider pads tested as-ground
and coated did not exceed one third engine life as shown in Figure 81. Improvements
in the surface finish of the slider pad provided greater load carrying capability
of the substrate below the coating and improved overall durability of the coated slider
pad,
[0320] The results from the cast iron and steel camshaft testing provided the following:
(1) a specification for angular alignment of the slider pads to the camshaft, (2)
clear evidence that the angular alignment specification was compatible with the camshaft
lobe crown specification, (3) the DLC coating will remain intact within the design
specifications for camshaft lobe crown and slider pad alignment beyond the maximum
design load, (4) a polishing operation is required after the grinding of the slider
pad, (5) an in-process specification for the grinding operation, (6) a specification
for surface finish of the slider pads prior to coating and (7) a polish operation
on the steel camshaft lobes contributes to the durability of the DLC coating on the
slider pad.
5.4 SLIDER PAD MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
5.4.1 SLIDER PAD MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION
[0321] The outer arm utilizes a machined casting. The prototype parts, machined from billet
stock, had established targets for angular variation of the slider pads and the surface
finish before coating. The development of the production grinding and polishing processes
took place concurrently to the testing, and is illustrated in Figure 82. The test
results provided feedback and guidance in the development of the manufacturing process
of the outer arm slider pad. Parameters In the process were adjusted based on the
results of the testing and new samples machined were subsequently evaluated on the
test fixture.
[0322] This section describes the evolution of the manufacturing process for the slider
pad from the coupon to the outer arm of the SRFL.
[0323] The first step to develop the production grinding process was to evaluate different
machines. A trial run was conducted on three different grinding machines. Each machine
utilized the same vitrified cubic boron nitride (CBN) wheel and dresser. The CBN wheel
was chosen as it offers (1) improved part to part consistency, (2) improved accuracy
in applications requiring tight tolerances and (3) improved efficiency by producing
more pieces between dress cycles compared to aluminum oxide. Each machine ground a
population of coupons using the same feed rate and removing the same amount of material
in each pass. A fixture was provided allowing the sequential grinding of coupons.
The trial was conducted on coupons because the samples were readily polished and tested
on the wear rig. This method provided an impartial means to evaluate the grinders
by holding parameters like the fixture, grinding wheel and dresser as constants.
[0324] Measurements were taken after each set of samples were collected. Angular measurements
of the slider pads were obtained using a Leitz PMM 654 coordinate measuring machine
(CMM). Surface finish measurements were taken on a Mahr LD 120 profilometer. Figure
83 shows the results of the slider pad angle control relative to the grinder equipment.
The results above the line are where a noticeable degradation of coating performance
occurred. The target region indicates that the parts tested to this included angle
show no difference in life testing. Two of the grinders failed to meet the targets
for included angle of the slider pad on the coupons. The third did very well by comparison.
The test results from the wear rig confirmed the sliding interface was sensitive to
included angles above this target. The combination of the grinder trials and the testing
discussed in the previous section helped in the selection of manufacturing equipment.
[0325] Figure 84 summarizes the surface finish measurements of the same coupons as the included
angle data shown in Figure 83. The surface finish specification for the slider pads
was established as a result of these test results. Surface finish values above the
limit line shown have reduced durability.
[0326] The same two grinders (A and B) also failed to meet the target for surface finish.
The target for surface finish was established based on the net change of surface finish
in the polishing process for a given population of parts. Coupons that started out
as outliers from the grinding process remained outliers after the polishing process;
therefore, controlling surface finish at the grinding operation was important to be
able to produce a slider pad after polish that meets the final surface finish prior
to coating.
[0327] The measurements were reviewed for each machine. Grinders A and B both had variation
in the form of each pad in the angular measurements. The results implied the grinding
wheel moved vertically as it ground the slider pads. Vertical wheel movement in this
kind of grinder is related to the overall stiffness of the machine. Machine stiffness
also can affect surface finish of the part being ground. Grinding the slider pads
of the outer arm to the specifications validated by the test fixture required the
stiffness identified in Grinder C.
[0328] The lessons learned grinding coupons were applied to development of a fixture for
grinding the outer arm for the SRFF. However the outer arm offered a significantly
different set of challenges. The outer arm is designed to be stiff in the direction
it is actuated by the camshaft lobes. The outer arm is not as stiff in the direction
of the slider pad width.
[0329] The grinding fixture needed to (1) damp each slider pad without bias, (2) support
each slider pad rigidly to resist the forces applied by grinding and (3) repeat this
procedure reliably in high volume production.
[0330] The development of the outer arm fixture started with a manual clamping style block.
Each revision of the fixture attempted to remove bias from the damping mechanism and
reduce the variation of the ground surface. Figure 85 illustrates the results through
design evolution of the fixture that holds the outer arm during the slider pad grinding
operation.
[0331] The development completed by the test plan set boundaries for key SRFF outer arm
slider pad specifications for surface finish parameters and form tolerance in terms
of included angle. The influence of grind operation surface finish to resulting final
surface finish after polishing was studied and used to establish specifications for
the intermediate process standards. These parameters were used to establish equipment
and part fixture development that assure the coating performance will be maintained
in high volume production.
5.4.2 SLIDER PAD MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT CONCLUSIONS
[0332] The DLC coating on the SRFF slider pads that was configured in a DVVL system including
DFHLA and OCV components was shown to be robust and durable well beyond the passenger
car lifetime requirement. Although DLC coating has been used in multiple industries,
it had limited production for the automotive valve train market. The work identified
and quantified the effect of the surface finish prior to the DLC application, DLC
stress level and the process to manufacture the slider pads. This technology was shown
to be appropriate and ready for the serial production of a SRFF slider pad.
[0333] The surface finish was critical to maintaining DLC coating on the slider pads throughout
lifetime tests. Testing results showed that early failures occurred when the surface
finish was too rough. The paper highlighted a regime of surface finish levels that
far exceeded lifetime testing requirements for the Ole This recipe maintained the
DLC intact on top of the chrome nitride base layer such that the base metal of the
SRFF was not exposed to contacting the camshaft lobe material.
[0334] The stress level on the DLC slider pad was also identified and proven. The testing
highlighted the need for angle control for the edges of the slider pad. It was shown
that a crown added to the camshaft lobe adds substantial robustness to edge loading
effects due to manufacturing tolerances. Specifications set for the angle control
exhibited testing results that exceeded lifetime durability requirements.
[0335] The camshaft lobe material was also found to be an important factor in the sliding
interface. The package requirements for the SRFF based DVVL system necessitated a
robust solution capable of sliding contact stresses up to 1000 MPa. The solution at
these stress levels, a high quality steel material, was needed to avoid camshaft lobe
spalling that would compromise the life of the sliding interface. The final system
with the steel camshaft material, crowned and polished was found to exceed lifetime
durability requirements.
[0336] The process to produce the slider pad and DLC in a high volume manufacturing process
was discussed. Key manufacturing development focused on grinding equipment selection
in combination with the grinder abrasive wheel and the fixture that holds the SRFF
outer arm for the production slider pad grinding process. The manufacturing processes
selected show robustness to meeting the specifications for assuring a durable sliding
interface for the lifetime of the engine.
[0337] The DLC coating on the slider pads was shown to exceed lifetime requirements which
are consistent with the system DVVL results. The DLC coating on the outer arm slider
pads was shown to be robust across all operating conditions. As a result, the SRFF
design is appropriate for four cylinder passenger car applications for the purpose
of improving fuel economy via reduced engine pumping losses at part load engine operation.
The DLC coated sliding interface for a DVVL was shown to be durable and enables VVA
technologies to be utilized in a variety of engine valve train applications.
II. SINGLE-LOBE CYLINDER DEACTIVATION (CDA) SYSTEM EMBODIMENT DESCRIPTION
1. CDA SYSTEM OVERVIEW
[0338] Figure 88 shows a compact cam-driven single-lobe cylinder deactivation (CDA) switching
rocker arm 1100 installed on a piston-driven internal combustion engine, and actuated
with the combination of dual-feed hydraulic lash adjusters (DFHLA) 110 and oil control
valves (OCV) 822.
[0339] Now, in reference to Figures 11, 88, 99, and 100, the CDA layout includes four main
components: Oil control valve (OCV) 822, dual feed hydraulic lash adjuster (DFHLA),
CDA switching rocker arm assembly (also referred to SRFF) 1100; single-lobe cam 1320.
The default configuration is in the normal-lift (latched) position where the inner
arm 1108 and outer arm 1102 of the CDA rocker arm assembly 1100 are locked together,
causing the engine valve to open and allowing the cylinder to operate as it would
in a standard valvetrain. The DFHLA 110 has two oil ports. The lower oil port 512
provides lash compensation and is fed engine oil similar to a standard HLA. The upper
oil port 506, referred as the switching pressure port, provides the conduit between
controlled oil pressure from the OCV 822 and the latch 1202 in the SRFF. As noted,
when the latch is engaged, the inner arm 1108 and outer arm 1102 in the SRFF 1110
operate together like a standard rocker arm to open the engine valve. In the no-lift
(unlatched) position, the inner arm 1108 and outer arm1102 can move independently
to enable cylinder deactivation.
[0340] As shown in Figures 88 and 99, a pair of lost motion torsion springs 1124 are incorporated
to bias the position of the inner arm 1108 so that it always maintains continuous
contact with the camshaft lobe 1320. The lost motion torsion springs 1124 require
a higher preload than designs that use multiple lobes to facilitate continuous contact
between the camshaft lobe 1320 and the inner arm roller bearing 1116.
[0341] Figure 89 shows a detailed view of the inner arm 1108 and outer arm 1102 in the SRFF
1100 along with the latch 1202 mechanism and roller bearing 1116. The functionality
of the SRFF 1100 design maintains similar packaging and reduces the complexity of
the camshaft 1300 compared to configurations with more than one lobe, for example,
separate no-lift lobes for each SRFF position can be eliminated.
[0342] As illustrated in Figure 91, a complete CDA system 1400 for one engine cylinder includes
one OCV 822, two SRFF rocker arms 1100 for the exhaust, two SRFF rocker arms 1100
for the intake, one DFHLA 110 for each SRFF 1100 and a single-lobe camshaft 1300 that
drives each SRFF 1100. Additionally, the CDA 1400 system is designed such that the
SRFF 1100 and DFHLA 110 are identical for both the intake and exhaust. This layout
allows for a single OCV 822 to simultaneously switch each of the four SRFF rocker
arm 1100 assemblies necessary for cylinder deactivation. Finally, the system is controlled
electronically from the ECU 825 to the OCV 822 to switch between normal-lift mode
and no-lift mode.
[0343] The engine layout for one exhaust and one intake valve using the SRFF 1100 is shown
in Figure 90. The packaging of the SRFF 1100 is similar to that of the standard valvetrain.
The cylinder head requires modification to provide an oil feed from the lower gallery
805 to the OCV 822 (Figures 88, 91). Additionally, a second (upper) oil gallery 802
is required to connect the OCV 822 and the switching ports 506 of the DFHLA 110. The
basic engine cylinder head architecture remains the same such that the valve centerline,
camshaft centerline, and DFHLA 110 centerline remain constant. Because these three
centerlines are maintained relative to a standard valvetrain, and because the SRFF
1100 remains compact, the cylinder head height, length, and width remain nearly unchanged
compared to a standard valvetrain system.
2. CDA SYSTEM ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES
[0344] Several technologies used in this system have multiple uses in varied applications,
they are described herein as components of the DVVL system disclosed herein. These
include:
2.1. OIL CONTROL VALVE (OCV)
[0345] As described in earlier sections, and shown in Figures 88, 91, 92, and 93, an oil
control valve (OCV) 822 is a control device that directs or does not direct pressurized
hydraulic fluid to cause the rocker arm 1100 to switch between normal-lift mode and
no-lift mode. The OCV is intelligently controlled, for example using a control signal
sent by the ECU 825.
2.2. DUAL FEED HYDRAULIC LASH ADJUSTOR (DFHLA)
[0346] Many hydraulic lash adjusting devices exist for maintaining lash in engines. For
DVVL switching of rocker arm 100 (Figure 4), traditional lash management is required,
but traditional HLA devices are insufficient to provide the necessary oil flow requirements
for switching, withstand the associated side-loading applied by the assembly 100 during
operation, and fit into restricted package spaces. A compact dual feed hydraulic lash
adjuster 110 (DFHLA), used together with a switching rocker arm 100 is described,
with a set of parameters and geometry designed to provide optimized oil flow pressure
with low consumption, and a set of parameters and geometry designed to manage side
loading.
[0347] As illustrated in Figure 10, the ball plunger end 601 fits into the ball socket 502
that allows rotational freedom of movement in all directions. This permits side and
possibly asymmetrical loading of the ball plunger end 601 in certain operating modes,
for example when switching from high-lift to low-lift and vice versa. In contrast
to typical ball end plungers for HLA devices, the DFHLA 110 ball end plunger 601 is
constructed with thicker material to resist side loading, shown in Figure 11 as plunger
thickness 510.
[0348] Selected materials for the ball plunger end 601 may also have higher allowable kinetic
stress loads, for example, chrome vanadium alloy.
[0349] Hydraulic flow pathways in the DFHLA 110 are designed for high flow and low pressure
drop to ensure consistent hydraulic switching and reduced pumping losses. The DFHLA
is installed in the engine in a cylindrical receiving socket sized to seal against
exterior surface 511, illustrated in Figure 11. The cylindrical receiving socket combines
with the first oil flow channel 504 to form a closed fluid pathway with a specified
cross-sectional area.
[0350] As shown in Figure 11, the preferred embodiment includes four oil flow ports 506
(only two shown) as they are arranged in an equally spaced fashion around the base
of the first oil flow channel 504. Additionally, two second oil flow channels 508
are arranged in an equally spaced fashion around ball end plunger 601, and are in
fluid communication with the first oil flow channel 504 through oil ports 506. Oil
flow ports 506 and the first oil flow channel 504 are sized with a specific area and
spaced around the DFHLA 110 body to ensure even flow of oil and minimized pressure
drop from the first flow channel 504 to the third oil flow channel 509. The third
oil flow channel 509 is sized for the combined oil flow from the multiple second oil
flow channels 508.
2.3. SENSING AND MEASUREMENT
[0351] Information gathered using sensors may be used to verify switching modes, identify
error conditions, or provide information analyzed and used for switching logic and
timing. As can be seen, the sensing and measurement embodiments described in earlier
sections pertaining to the DVVL system may also be applied to the CDA system. Therefore,
the valve position and/or motion sensing and logic used in DVVL, may also be used
in the CDA system. Similarly, the sensing and logic used in determining the position/motion
of the rocker arms, or the relative position/motion of the rocker arms relative to
each other used for the DVVL system may also be used in the CDA system.
2.4. TORSION SPRING DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
[0352] A robust torsion spring 1124 design that provides more torque than conventional existing
rocker arm designs, while maintaining high reliability, enables the CDA system to
maintain proper operation through all dynamic operating modes. The design and manufacture
of the torsion springs 1124 are described in later sections.
3. SWITCHING CONTROL AND LOGIC
3.1. ENGINE IMPLEMENTATION
[0353] CDA embodiments may include any number of cylinders, for example 4 and 6 cylinder
in-line and 6 and 8 cylinder V-configurations.
3.2. HYDRAULIC FLUID DELIVERY SYSTEM TO THE ROCKER ARM ASSEMBLY
[0354] As shown in figure 91, the hydraulic fluid system delivers engine oil at a controlled
pressure to the CDA switching rocker arm 1100. In this arrangement, engine oil from
the cylinder head 801 that is not pressure regulated feeds into the DFHLA 110 via
the lower oil gallery 805. This oil is always in fluid communication with the lower
port 512 of the DFHLA 110, where it is used to perform normal hydraulic lash adjustment.
Engine oil from the cylinder head 801 that is not pressure regulated is also supplied
to the oil control valve 822. Hydraulic fluid from OCV 822, supplied at a controlled
pressure, is supplied to the upper oil gallery 802. Switching of OCV 822 determines
the lift mode for each of the CDA rocker arm assembly 1100 assemblies that comprise
a CDA deactivation system 1400 for a given engine cylinder. As described in following
sections, actuation of the OCV valve 822 is directed by the engine control unit 825
using logic based on both sensed and stored information for particular physical configuration,
switching window, and set of operating conditions, for example, a certain number of
cylinders and a certain oil temperature. Pressure regulated hydraulic fluid from the
upper gallery 802 is directed to the DFHLA 110 upper port 506, where it is transmitted
to the switching rocker arm assembly 1100. Hydraulic fluid is communicated through
the rocker arm assembly 1100 to the latch pin 1202 assembly, where it is used to initiate
switching between normal-lift and no-lift states.
[0355] Purging accumulated air in the upper gallery 802 is important to maintain hydraulic
stiffness and minimize variation in the pressure rise time. Pressure rise time directly
affects the latch movement time during switching operations. The passive air bleed
port 832, shown in Figure 91 was added to the high points in the upper gallery 802
to vent accumulated air into the cylinder head air space under the valve cover.
3.2.1.HYDRAULIC FLUID DELIVERY FOR NORMAL-LIFT MODE
[0356] Figure 92 shows the SRFF 1100 in the default position where the electronic signal
to the OCV 822 is absent, and also shows a cross section of the system and components
that enable operation in normal-lift mode: OCV 822, DFHLA 110, latch spring 1204,
latch 1202, outer arm 1102, cam 1320, roller bearing 1116, inner arm 1108, valve pad
1140 and engine valve 112. Unregulated engine oil pressure in the lower gallery 805
is in communication with the lash compensation (lower) port 512 of the DFHLA 110 to
enable standard lash compensation. The OCV 822 regulates oil pressure to the upper
oil gallery 802, which then supplies oil to the upper port 506 at 0.2 to 0.4 bar when
the ECU 825 electrical signal is absent. This pressure value is below the pressure
required to compress the latch spring 1204 move the latch pin 1202. This pressure
value serves to keep the oil circuit full of oil and free of air to achieve the required
system response. The cam 1320 lobe contacts the roller bearing, rotating outer arm
1102 about the DFHLA 110 ball socket to open and close the valve. When the latch 1202
is engaged, the SRFF functions similarly to a standard RFF rocker arm assembly.
3.2.2.HYDRAULIC FLUID DELIVERY FOR NO-LIFT MODE
[0357] Figures 93A, B, and C show detailed views of the SRFF 1100 during cylinder deactivation
(no-lift mode). The Engine Control Unit (ECU) 825 (Figure 91) provides a signal to
the OCV 822 such that oil pressure is supplied to the latch 1202 causing it to retract
as shown in Figure 93b. The pressure required to fully retract the latch is 2 bar
or greater. The higher torsion spring 1124 (Figures 88, 99) preload in this single-lobe
CDA embodiment enables the camshaft lobe 1320 to stay in contact with the inner arm
1108 roller bearing 1116 as this occurs in lost motion, and the engine valve remains
closed as shown in Figure 93c.
3.3. OPERATING PARAMETERS
[0358] An important factor in operating a CDA system 1400 (Figure 91) is the reliable control
of switching between normal-lift mode to no-lift mode. CDA valve actuation systems
1400 can only be switched between modes during a predetermined window of time. As
described above, switching from high-lift mode to low-lift mode and vice versa is
initiated by a signal from the engine control unit (ECU) 825 (Figure 91) using logic
that analyzes stored information, for example a switching window for particular physical
configuration, stored operating conditions, and processed data that is gathered by
sensors. Switching window durations are determined by the CDA system physical configuration,
including the number of cylinders, the number of cylinders controlled by a single
OCV, the valve lift duration, engine speed, and the latch response times inherent
in the hydraulic control and mechanical system.
3.3.1.GATHERED DATA
[0359] Real-time sensor information includes input from any number of sensors, as illustrated
in the exemplary CDA system 1400 illustrated in Figure 91: As described previously,
sensors may include 1) valve stem movement 829, as measured in one embodiment using
a linear variable differential transformer (LVDT), 2) motion/position 828 and latch
position 827 using a Hall-effect sensor or motion detector, 3) DFHLA movement 826
using a proximity switch, Hall effect sensor, or other means, 4) oil pressure 830,
and 5) oil temperature 890. Cam shaft rotary position and speed may be gathered directly
or inferred from the engine speed sensor.
[0360] In a hydraulically actuated VVA system, the oil temperature affects the stiffness
of the hydraulic system used for switching in systems such as CDA and VVL. If the
oil is too cold, its viscosity slows switching time, causing a malfunction. This temperature
relationship is illustrated for an exemplary CDA switching rocker arm 1100 system
1400 in Figure 96. An accurate oil temperature, in one embodiment taken with a sensor
890 shown in Figure 91, located near the point of use rather than in the engine oil
crankcase, provides accurate information. In one example, the oil temperature in a
CDA system 1400, monitored close to the oil control valves (OCV) 822, must be greater
than or equal to 20 degrees C to initiate no-lift (unlatched) operation with the required
hydraulic stiffness. Measurements can be taken with any number of commercially available
components, for example a thermocouple. The oil control valves are described further
in published US Patent Applications
US2010/0089347 published April 15, 2010 and
US2010/0018482 published Jan. 28, 2010.
[0361] Sensor information is sent to the Engine Control Unit (ECU) 825 as a real-time operating
parameter.
3.4. STORED INFORMATION
3.4.1.SWITCHING WINDOW ALGORITHMS
[0362] The SRFF requires mode switching from the normal-lift to no-lift (deactivated), state
and vice-versa. Switching is required to occur in less than one camshaft revolution
to ensure proper engine operation. Mode switching can occur only when the SRFF is
on the base circle 1322 (Figure 101) of the cam 1320. Switching between valve lift
states cannot occur when the latch 1202 (Figure 93) is loaded and movement is restricted.
The latch 1202 transition period between full and partial engagement must be controlled
to keep the latch 1202 from slipping. Switching windows combined with electro-mechanical
latch response times inherent in the CDA system 1400 (Figure 91) identify the opportunities
for mode switching.
[0363] The intended functional parameters of the SRFF based CDA system 1400 is analogous
to the Type-V switching roller lifter designs that are in production today. The mode
switch between normal-lift and no-lift is set to occur during the base circle 1322
event and be synchronized to the camshaft 1300 rotational position. The SRFF default
position is set to normal-lift. The oil flow demand on the SRFF is also similar to
the Type-V CDA production systems.
[0364] A critical shift is defined as an unintended event that may occur when latch is partially
engaged, causing the valve to lift partially and suddenly drop back to the valve seat.
This condition is unlikely, when the switching commands are executed during prescribed
parameters of oil temperature, engine speeds with the camshaft position synchronized
switching. The critical shift event creates an impact load to the DFHLA 110, which
may require high strength DFHLA's, described in earlier sections, as enabling system
components.
[0365] The fundamentals the synchronized switching for the CDA system 1400 are illustrated
in Figure 94. The exhaust valve profile 1450 and intake valve profile 1452 are plotted
as a function of crankshaft angle. The required switching window is defined as the
sum of the time it takes for the following operations: 1) the OCV 822 valve to supply
pressurized oil, 2) the hydraulic system pressure to overcome the biasing spring 1204
and cause latch 1202 mechanical movement, and 3) the complete movement of latch 1202
necessary for mode change from no-lift to normal-lift and visa-versa. Switching window
duration 1454, in this exhaust example, exists once the exhaust closes until the exhaust
starts to open again. The latch 1202 remains restricted during the exhaust lift event.
The timing windows that may cause critical shift 1456, described in more detail in
later sections, are identified in Figure 94. The switching window for the intake can
be described in similar terms relative to the intake lift profile.
LATCH PRE-LOAD
[0366] The CDA rocker arm assembly 1100 switching mechanism is designed such that hydraulic
pressure can be applied to the latch 1202 after the latch lash is absorbed, resulting
in no change in function. This design parameter allows hydraulic pressure to be initiated
by the OCV 822 in the upper oil gallery 802 during the intake valve lift event. Once
the intake valve lift profile 1452 returns to the base circle 1322 no-load condition,
the latch completes its movement to the specified latched or unlatched mode. This
design parameter helps to maximize the available switching window.
HYDRAULIC RESPONSE TIME VERSUS TEMPERATURE
[0367] Figure 96 shows the dependence of latch 1202 response time on oil temperature using
SAE 5W-30 oil. The latch 1202 response time, reflects the duration for the latch 1202
to move from normal-lift (latched) to no-lift (unlatched) position, and vice-versa.
The latch 1202 response time requires ten milliseconds with an oil temperature of
20° C and 3 bar oil pressure in the switching pressure port 506. Latch response time
is reduced to five milliseconds under the same pressure conditions at higher operating
temperatures, for example 40° C. Hydraulic response times are used to determine switching
windows.
VARIABLE VALVE TIMING
[0368] Now, with reference to Figures 94 and 95, some camshaft drive systems are designed
to have greater phasing authority/ range of motion, relative to the crankshaft angle
than standard drive systems. This technology may be referred to as variable valve
timing, and must be considered along with engine speed when determining the allowable
switching window duration 1454.
[0369] The plots of valve lift profile as a function of crankshaft angle are shown in Figure
95, illustrating the effect that variable valve timing has on the switching window
duration 1454. Exhaust valve lift profile 1450 and intake valve lift profile 1452
show a typical cycle with no variable valve timing capability that results in no switching
window 1455 (also seen in Figure 94), Exhaust valve lift profile 1460 and intake valve
lift profile 1462 show a typical cycle that has variable valve timing capability that
results in no switching window 1464. This example of variable valve timing results
in an increase in the duration of the no switching window 1458. Assuming a variable
valve timing capability of 120 degrees crankshaft angle duration between the exhaust
and intake camshafts, the time duration shift 1458 is 6 milliseconds at 3500 engine
rpm.
[0370] Figure 97 is a plot showing calculated and measured variations in switching time
due to the effects of temperature and cam phasing. The plot is based on a switching
window that ranges from 420 crankshaft degrees with camshaft phasing at minimum overlap
1468 to 540 crankshaft degrees with camshaft phasing at maximum overlap 1466. The
latch response time of 5 milliseconds shown on this plot is for normal engine operating
temperatures of 40 - 120° C. The hydraulic response variation 1470 is measured from
ECU 825 switching signal initiation until the hydraulic pressure is sufficient to
cause the latch 1202 to move. Based on CDA system 1400 studies that use OCVs to control
hydraulic oil pressure, the maximum variation is approximately 10 milliseconds. This
hydraulic response variation 1470 takes into consideration voltage to the OCV 822,
temperature, and oil pressure in the engine. The phasing position with minimum overlap
1468 provides an available switching time of 20 milliseconds at 3500 engine rpm, and
the total latch response time is 15 milliseconds, representing a 5 millisecond margin
between the time available for switching and the latch 1202 response time.
[0371] Figure 98 is also a plot showing calculated and measured variations in switching
time due to the effects of temperature and cam phasing. The plot is based on a switching
window that ranges from 420 crankshaft degrees with camshaft phasing at minimum overlap
1468 to 540 crankshaft degrees with camshaft phasing at maximum overlap 1466. The
latch response time of 10 milliseconds shown on this plot is for a cold engine operating
temperatures of 20° C. The hydraulic response variation 1470 is measured from ECU
825 switching signal initiation until the hydraulic pressure is sufficient to cause
the latch 1202 to move. Based on CDA system 1400 studies that use OCVs to control
hydraulic oil pressure, the maximum variation is approximately 10 milliseconds. This
hydraulic response variation 1470 takes into consideration voltage to the OCV 822,
temperature, and oil pressure in the engine. The phasing position with minimum overlap
1468 provides an available switching time of 20 milliseconds at 3500 engine rpm, and
the total latch response time is 20 milliseconds, representing reduced design margin
between the time available for switching and the latch 1202 response time.
3.4.2. STORED OPERATING PARAMETERS
[0372] These variables include engine configuration parameters such as variable valve timing
and predicted latch response times as a function of operating temperature.
3.5. CONTROL LOGIC
[0373] As noted above, CDA switching can only occur during a small predetermined window
of time under certain operating conditions, and switching the CDA system outside of
the timing window may result in a critical shift event, that could result in damage
to the valve train and/or other engine parts. Because engine conditions such as oil
pressure, temperature, emissions, and load may vary rapidly, a high-speed processor
can be used to analyze real-time conditions, compare them to known operating parameters
that characterize a working system, reconcile the results to determine when to switch,
and send a switching signal. These operations can be performed hundreds or thousands
of times per second. In embodiments, this computing function may be performed by a
dedicated processor, or by an existing multi-purpose automotive control system referred
to as the engine control unit (ECU). A typical ECU has an input section for analog
and digital data, a processing section that includes a microprocessor, programmable
memory, and random access memory, and an output section that might include relays,
switches, and warning light actuation.
[0374] In one embodiment, the engine control unit (ECU) 825 shown in Figure 91, accepts
input from multiple sensors such as valve stem movement 829, motion/position 828,
latch position 827, DFHLA movement 826, oil pressure 830, and oil temperature 890.
Data such as allowable operating temperature and pressure for given engine speeds
and switching windows are stored in memory. Real-time gathered information is then
compared with stored information and analyzed to provide the logic for ECU 825 switching
timing and control.
[0375] After input is analyzed, a control signal is transmitted by the ECU 825 to the OCV
822 to initiate switching operation, which may be timed to avoid critical shift events
while meeting engine performance goals such as improved fuel economy and lowered emissions.
If necessary, the ECU 825may also alert operators to error conditions.
4. CDA ROCKER ARM ASSEMBLY
[0376] Figure 99 illustrates a perspective view of an exemplary CDA rocker arm assembly
1100. The CDA rocker arm assembly 1100 is shown by way of example only and it will
be appreciated that the configuration of the CDA rocker arm assembly 1100 that is
the subject of this application is not limited to the configuration of the CDA rocker
arm assembly 1100 illustrated in the figures contained herein.
[0377] As shown in Figures 99 and 100, the CDA rocker arm assembly 1 100 includes an outer
arm 1102 having a first outer side arm 1104 and a second outer side arm 1106. An inner
arm 1108 is disposed between the first outer side arm 1104 and second outer side arm
1106. The inner arm 1108 has a first inner side arm 1110 and a second inner side arm
1112. The inner arm 1108 and outer arm 1102 are both mounted to a pivot axle 1114,
located adjacent the first end 1101 of the rocker arm 1100, which secures the inner
arm 1108 to the outer arm 1102 while also allowing a rotational degree of freedom
pivoting about the pivot axle 1114 when the rocker arm 1100 is in a no-lift state.
In addition to the illustrated embodiment having a separate pivot axle 1114 mounted
to the outer arm 1102 and inner arm 1108, the pivot axle 1114 may be integral to the
outer arm 1102 or the inner arm 1108.
[0378] The CDA rocker arm assembly 1100 has a bearing 1190 comprising a roller 1116 that
is mounted between the first inner side arm 1110 and second inner side arm 1112 on
a bearing axle 1118 that, during normal operation of the rocker arm, serves to transfer
energy from a rotating cam (not shown) to the rocker arm 1100. Mounting the roller
1116 on the bearing axle 1118 allows the bearing 1190 to rotate about the axle 1118,
which serves to reduce the friction generated by the contact of the rotating cam with
the roller 1116. As discussed herein, the roller 1116 is rotatably secured to the
inner arm 1108, which in turn may rotate relative to the outer arm 1102 about the
pivot axle 1114 under certain conditions. In the illustrated embodiment, the bearing
axle 1118 is mounted to the inner arm 1108 in the bearing axle apertures 1260 of the
inner arm 1108 and extends through the bearing axle slots 1126 of the outer arm 1102.
Other configurations are possible when utilizing a bearing axle 1118, such as having
the bearing axle 1118 not extend through bearing axle slots 1126 but still mounted
in bearing axle apertures 1260 of the inner arm 1108, for example.
[0379] When the rocker arm 1100 is in a no-lift state, the inner arm 1108 pivots downwardly
relative to the outer arm 1102 when the lifting portion of the cam (1324 in Figure
101) comes into contact with the roller 1116 of bearing 1190, thereby pressing it
downward. The axle slots 1126 allow for the downward movement of the bearing axle
1118, and therefore of the inner arm 1108 and bearing 1190. As the cam continues to
rotate, the lifting portion of the cam rotates away from the roller 1116 of bearing
1190, allowing the bearing 1190 to move upwardly as the bearing axle 1118 is biased
upwardly by the bearing axle torsion springs 1124. The illustrated bearing axle springs
1124 are torsion springs secured to mounts 1150 located on the outer arm 1102 by spring
retainers 1130. The torsion springs 1124 are secured adjacent the second end 1103
of the rocker arm 1100 and have spring arms 1127 that come into contact with the bearing
axle 1118. As the bearing axle 1118 and spring arm 1127 move downward, the bearing
axle 1118 slides along the spring arm 1127. The configuration of rocker arm 1100 having
the torsion springs 1124 secured adjacent the second end 1103 of the rocker arm 1100,
and the pivot axle 1114 located adjacent the first end 1101 of the rocker arm, with
the bearing axle 1118 between the pivot axle 1114 and the axle spring 1124, lessens
the mass near the first end 1101 of the rocker arm.
[0380] As shown in Figures 101 and 102, the valve stem 1350 is also in contact with the
rocker arm 1100 near its first end 1101, and thus the reduced mass at the first end
1101 of the rocker arm 1100 reduces the mass of the overall valve train (not shown),
thereby reducing the force necessary to change the velocity of the valve train. It
should be noted that other spring configurations may be used to bias the bearing axle
1118, such as a single continuous spring.
[0381] Figure 100 illustrates an exploded view of the CDA rocker arm assembly 1100 of Figure
99. The exploded view in Figure 100 and the assembly view in Figure 99, show bearing
1190, a needle roller-type bearing that comprises a substantially cylindrical roller
1116 in combination with needles 1200, which can be mounted on a bearing axle 1118.
The bearing 1190 serves to transfer the rotational motion of the cam to the rocker
arm 100 that in turn transfers motion to the valve stem 350, for example in the configuration
shown in Figures 101 and 102. As shown in Figures 99 and 100, the bearing axle 1118
may be mounted in the bearing axle apertures 1260 of the inner arm 1108. In such a
configuration, the axle slots 1126 of the outer arm 1102 accept the bearing axle 1118
and allow for lost motion movement of the bearing axle 1118 and by extension the inner
arm 1108 when the rocker arm 1100 is in a non-lift state. "Lost motion" movement can
be considered movement of the rocker arm 1100 that does not transmit the rotating
motion of the cam to the valve. In the illustrated embodiments, lost motion is exhibited
by the pivotal motion of the inner arm 1108 relative to the outer arm 1102 about the
pivot axle 1114.
[0382] Other configurations other than bearing 1190 also permit the transfer of motion from
the cam to the rocker arm 1100. For example, a smooth non-rotating surface (not shown)
for interfacing with the cam lift lobe (1320 in Figure 101) may be mounted on or formed
integral to the inner arm 1108 at approximately the location where the bearing 1190
is shown in Figure 99 relative to the inner arm 1108 and rocker arm 1100. Such a non-rotating
surface may comprise a friction pad formed on the non-rotating surface. In another
example, alternative bearings, such as bearings with multiple concentric rollers,
may be used effectively as a substitute for bearing 1190.
[0383] With reference to Figures 99 and 100, the elephant foot is mounted on the pivot axle
1114 between the first 1110 and second 1112 inner side arms. The pivot axle 1114 is
mounted in the inner pivot axle apertures 1220 and outer pivot axle apertures 1230
adjacent the first end 1101 of the rocker arm 1100. Lips 1240 formed on inner arm
1108 prevent the elephant foot 1140 from rotating about the pivot axle 1114. The elephant
foot 1140 engages the end of the valve stem 1350 as shown in Figure 102. In an alternative
embodiment, the elephant foot 1140 may be removed, and instead an interfacing surface
complementary to the tip of the valve stem 1350 may be placed on the pivot axle 1114.
[0384] Figures 101 and 102 illustrate a side view and front view, respectively, of rocker
arm 1100 in relation to a cam 1300 having a lift lobe 1320 with a base circle 1322
and lifting portion 1324. A roller 1116 is illustrated in contact with the lift lobe
1320. A dual feed hydraulic lash adjuster (DFHLA) 110 engages the rocker arm 1100
adjacent its second end 1103, and applies upward pressure to the rocker arm 1100,
and in particular the outer rocker arm 1102, while mitigating against valve lash.
The valve stem 1350 engages the elephant foot 1140 adjacent the first end 1101 of
the rocker arm 1100. In the normal-lift state, the rocker arm 1100 periodically pushes
the valve stem 1350 downward, which serves to open the corresponding valve (not shown).
4.1. TORSION SPRING
[0385] As described in following sections, a rocker arm 1100 in the no-lift state may be
subjected to excessive pump-up of the lash adjuster 110, whether due to excessive
oil pressure, the onset of non-steady-state conditions, or other causes. This may
result in an increase in the effective length of the lash adjuster 110 as pressurized
oil fills its interior. Such a scenario may occur for example during a cold start
of the engine, and could take significant time to resolve on its own if left unchecked
and could even result in permanent engine damage. Under such circumstances, the latch
1202 may not be able to activate the rocker arm 1100 until the lash adjuster 110 has
returned to a normal operating length. In this scenario, the lash adjuster 110 applies
upward pressure to the outer arm 1102, bringing the outer arm 1102 closer to the cam
1300.
[0386] The lost motion torsion spring 1124 on the SRFF was designed to provide sufficient
force to keep the roller bearing 1116 in contact with the camshaft lift lobe 1320
during no-lift operation to ensure controlled acceleration and deceleration of the
inner arm subassembly and controlled return of the inner arm 1108 to the latching
position while preserving the latch lash. A pump-up scenario requires a stronger torsion
spring 1124 to compensate for the additional force from pump-up.
[0387] Rectangular wire cross sections for the torsion springs 1124 were used to reduce
the package space, keeping the assembly moment of inertia low and providing sufficient
cross section height to sustain the operating loads. Stress calculations and FEA,
and test validation, described in following sections, were used in developing the
torsion spring 1124 components.
[0388] A torsion spring 1124 (Figure 99) design and manufacturing process is described that
results in a compact design with a generally rectangular shaped wire made with selected
materials of construction.
[0389] Now, with reference to Figures 30A, 30B, and 99, the torsion spring 1124 is constructed
from a wire 397 that is generally trapezoidal in shape. The trapezoidal shape is designed
to allow wire 397 to deform into a generally rectangular shape as force is applied
during the winding process. After torsion spring 1124 is wound, the shape of the resulting
wires can be described as similar to a first wire 396 with a generally rectangular
shape cross section. Figure 99 shows two torsion spring embodiments, illustrated as
multiple coils 398, 399 in cross section. In a preferred embodiment, wire 396 has
a rectangular cross sectional shape, with two elongated sides, shown here as the vertical
sides 402, 404 and a top 401 and bottom 403. The ratio of the average length of side
402 and side 404 to the average length of top 401 and bottom 403 of the coil can be
any value less than 1. This ratio produces more stiffness along the coil axis of bending
400 than a spring coiled with round wire with a diameter equal to the average length
of top 401 and bottom 403 of the coil 398. In an alternate embodiment, the cross section
wire shape has a generally trapezoidal shape with a larger top 401 and a smaller bottom
403.
[0390] In this configuration, as the coils are wound, elongated side 402 of each coil rests
against the elongated side 402 of the previous coil, thereby stabilizing the torsion
springs 1124. The shape and arrangement holds all of the coils in an upright position,
preventing them from passing over each other or angling when under pressure.
[0391] When the rocker arm assembly 1100 is operating, the generally rectangular or trapezoidal
shape of the torsion springs 1124, as they bend about axis 400 shown in Figures 30A
and 30B, produce high part stress, particularly tensile stress on top surface 401.
To meet durability requirements, a combination of techniques and materials are used
together. For example, the torsion spring may be made of a material that includes
Chrome Vanadium alloy steel along with this design to improve strength and durability.
The torsion spring may be heated and quickly cooled to temper the springs. This reduces
residual part stress. Impacting the surface of the wire 396, 397 used for creating
the torsion springs with projectiles, or 'shot peening' is used to put residual compressive
stress in the surface of the wire 396, 397. The wire 396, 397 is then wound into the
torsion spring. Due to their shot peening, the resulting torsion springs can now accept
more tensile stress than identical springs made without shot peening.
4.2. TORSION SPRING POCKET
[0392] As illustrated in Figure 100, knob 1262 extends from the end of the bearing axle
1118 and creates a slot 1264 in which the spring arm 1127 sits. In one alternative,
a hollow bearing axle 1118 may be used along with a separate spring mounting pin (not
shown) comprising a feature such as the knob 1262 and slot 1264 for mounting the spring
arm 1127.
4.3. OUTER ARM ASSEMBLY
4.3.1.LATCH MECHANISM DESCRIPTION
[0393] The mechanism for selectively deactivating the rocker arm 1100, which in the illustrated
embodiment is found near the second end 1103 of the rocker arm 1100, is shown in Figure
100 as comprising latch 1202, latch spring 1204, spring retainer 1206 and clip 1208.
The latch 1202 is configured to be mounted inside the outer arm 1102. The latch spring
1204 is placed inside the latch 1202 and secured in place by the latch spring retainer
1206 and clip 1208. Once installed, the latch spring 1204 biases the latch 1202 toward
the first end 1101 of the rocker arm 1100, allowing the latch 1202, and in particular
the engaging portion 1210 to engage the inner arm 1108, thereby preventing the inner
arm 1108 from moving with respect to the outer arm 1102. When the latch 1202 is engaged
with the inner arm in this way, the rocker arm 1100 is in the normal-lift state, and
will transfer motion from the cam to the valve stem.
[0394] In the assembled rocker arm 1100, the latch 1202 alternates between normal-lift and
no-lift states. The rocker arm 1100 may enter the no-lift state when oil pressure
sufficient to counteract the biasing force of latch spring 1204 is applied, for example,
through the port 1212 which is configured to permit oil pressure to be applied to
the surface of the latch 1202. When the oil pressure is applied, the latch 1202 is
pushed toward the second end 1103 of the rocker arm 1100, thereby withdrawing the
latch 1202 from engagement with the inner arm 1108 and allowing the inner arm 1108
to rotate about the pivot axle 1114. In both the normal-lift and no-lift states, the
linear portion 1250 of orientation clip 1214 engages the latch 1202 at the flat surface
1218. The orientation clip 1250 is mounted in the clip apertures 1216, and thereby
maintains a horizontal orientation of the linear portion 1250 relative to the rocker
arm 1100. This restricts the orientation of the flat surface 1218 to also be horizontal,
thereby orienting the latch 1202 in the appropriate direction for consistent engagement
with the inner arm 1108.
4.3.2.LATCH PIN DESIGN
[0395] As shown in Figures 93A,B,C, the SRFF rocker arm 1100 latch 1202 operating in no-lift
mode is retracted inside the outer arm1202, while the inner arm 1108 follows the camshaft
lift lobe 1320. Under certain conditions, transitioning from no-lift mode to normal-lift
mode can result in a condition shown in Figure 103, where the latch 1202 extends before
the inner arm 1108 returns to the position where the latch 1202 normally engages.
[0396] A re-engagement feature was added to the SRFF to prevent the condition where the
inner arm 1108 is blocked and trapped in a position below the latch 1202. An inner
arm sloped surface 1474 and a latch sloped surface 1472 were optimized to provide
smooth latch 1202 movement to the retracted position when the inner arm 1108 contacts
the latch sloped surface 1472. The design avoids damage to latch mechanism that may
be caused by pressure changes at the switching pressure port 506 (Figure 88).
[0397] As described in previous sections pertaining to DVVL rocker arm assembly and operation,
several latch embodiments may be employed to allow reliable operation of the latching
mechanism during operating conditions, including latches with round or other non-flat
shapes.
4.4. SYSTEM PACKAGING
[0398] The SRFF-1F design is focused on minimizing valvetrain packaging changes compared
to a standard production layout. Important design parameters include relative placement
of the camshaft lobes in relation to the SRFF roller bearing, and axial alignment
between the steel camshaft and aluminum cylinder head. The steel and aluminum components
have different thermal growth coefficients that can shift the camshaft lobes relative
to the SRFF-1F.
[0399] Figure 104 shows both proper and poor alignment of the single camshaft lobe relative
to the SRFF 1100 outer arm 1102 and bearing 1116. The proper alignment shows the camshaft
lift lobe 1320 centered over the roller bearing 1116. The single camshaft lobe 1320
and SRFF 1110 is designed to avoid edge loading 1482 on the roller bearing 1116 and
avoid cam lobe 1320 contact 1480 with the outer arm 1102. The elimination of camshaft
no-lift lobes found in multi-lobe CDA configurations relaxes the requirements for
tight manufacturing tolerances and assembly control of the camshaft lobe width and
position, making the camshaft manufacturing process similar to that of standard camshafts
used on Type II engines.
4.5. CDA LATCH MECHANISM HYDRAULIC OPERATION
[0400] As previously mentioned, pump-up is a term used to describe a condition in which
the HLA is extended past its intended working dimension; thereby preventing the valve
from returning to its seat during the base circle event.
[0401] Figure 105 below shows a standard valvetrain system and the forces acting on the
roller finger follower assembly (RFF) 1496 during a camshaft base circle event. The
hydraulic lash adjuster force 1494 is a combination of the hydraulic lash adjuster
(HLA) 1493 force generated by the oil pressure in the lash compensation port 1491
and the HLA internal spring force. The cam reaction force 1490 is between the camshaft
1320 and the RFF bearing. The reaction force 1492 is between the RFF 1496 and the
valve 112 tip. The force balance must be such that the valve spring force 1492 will
prevent unintentional opening of the valve 112. If the valve reaction force 1492 generated
by the HLA force 1494 and cam reaction force 1490 exceeds the seating force required
to seat the valve 112, then the valve 112 will be lifted and held open during base
circle operation, which is undesirable. This description of the standard fixed arm
system does not include the dynamic operating loads.
[0402] The SRFF 1100 was designed with additional consideration for pump-up when the system
is in no-lift mode. Pump-up of the DFHLA 110 when the SRFF 1100 is in no-lift mode
can create a condition in which the inner arm 1108 does not return to the position
where the latch 1202 can re-engage the inner arm 1108.
[0403] The SRFF 1100 reacts similarly to a standard RFF 1496 (Figure 105) when the SRFF
1100 is in normal-lift mode. Maintaining the required latch lash to switch the SRFF
1100 while preventing pump-up is resolved by applying additional force from the torsion
springs 1124 to overcome the HLA force 1494 in addition to the torsional already force
required to return the inner arm 1108 to its the latch engagement position.
[0404] Figure 106 shows the balance of forces acting on the SRFF 1100 when the system is
in no-lift mode: the DFHLA force 1499, caused by the oil pressure at the lash compensator
port 512 (Figure 88) plus the plunger spring force 1498, the cam reaction force 1490,
and the torsion spring force 1495. The torsion force 1495 produced by springs 1124
is converted, via the bearing axle 1118 and the spring arms 1127, to spring reaction
force 1500 acting on the inner arm 1108.
[0405] The torsion springs 1124 in the SRFF rocker arm assembly 1100 were designed to provide
sufficient force to keep the roller bearing 1116 in contact with the camshaft lift
lobe 1320 during no-lift mode to ensure controlled acceleration and deceleration of
the inner arm 1108 subassembly and return the inner arm 1108 to the latching position
while preserving the latch lash 1205. The torsion spring 1124 design for SRFF 1100
design also accounts for a variation in oil pressure at the lash compensation port
512 when the system is in no-lift mode. Oil pressure regulation can reduce the load
requirements for the torsion springs 1124 with direct effect on the spring sizing.
[0406] Figure 107 shows the requirements for oil pressure in the lash compensation pressure
port 512. Limited oil pressure for the SRFF is only required when the system is in
no-lift mode. Consideration for synchronized switching, described in earlier sections,
limits the no-lift mode for temperatures lower than 20°C.
4.6. CDA ASSEMBLY LASH MANAGEMENT
[0407] Figure 108 shows the latch lash 1205 for the SRFF 1100. For a single-lobe CDA system,
the total mechanical lash 1505 is reduced to a single latch lash 1205 value, as opposed
to the sum of camshaft lash 1504 and latch lash 1205 for CDA designs with more than
one lobe. The latch lash 1205 for the SRFF 1100 is the distance between the latch
1202 and the inner arm 1108.
[0408] Figure 109 compares the opening ramp on a camshaft designed for a three-lobe SRFF
and the single-lobe SRFF.
[0409] Camshaft lash was eliminated by design for the single-lobe SRFF. The elimination
of the camshaft lash 1504 allows further optimization of the camshaft lift profile,
by creating a lifting ramp reduction 1510, thus allowing for longer lift events. The
camshaft opening ramps 1506 for the SRFF are reduced up to 36% from the camshaft opening
ramps 1506 required for similar designs using multiple lobes.
[0410] In addition, mechanical lash variation on the SRFF is improved 39% over an analogous
three-lobe design due to the elimination of the camshaft lash and the features associated
with it, for example, manufacturing tolerances for the camshaft no-lift lobes base
circle radius, lobe run-out, required slider pad to slider pad and slider pad to roller
bearing parallelism.
4.7. CDA ASSEMBLY DYNAMICS
4.7.1.DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0411] The SRFF rocker arm 1100 and system 1400 (Figure 91) is designed to meet the dynamic
stability requirements for the entire engine operating range. SRFF stiffness and moment
of inertia (MOI) were analyzed for the SRFF design. The MOI of the SRFF assembly 1100
is measured about the pivot axle 1114 (Figure 99) which is the rotational axis that
passes through the SRFF socket that is in contact with the DFHLA 110. Stiffness is
measured at the interface between cam 1320 and bearing 1116. Figure 110 shows measured
stiffness plotted against calculated assembly MOI. The SRFF relationship between stiffness
and MOI compares well with standard RFF's used on Type II engines currently in production.
4.7.2.ANALYSIS
[0412] Several design and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) iterations were performed to maximize
the stiffness and reduce MOI over the DFHLA end of the SRFF. The mass intensive components
were placed over the DFHLA end of the SRFF to minimize the MOI. The torsion springs
1124, one of the heaviest components in the SRFF assembly were positioned in close
proximity to the SRFF rotational axis. The latching mechanism was also located near
the DFHLA. The vertical section height of the SRFF was increased to maximize stiffness
while minimizing MOI.
[0413] The SRFF designs were optimized using load information from kinematic modeling. Key
input parameters for the analysis include valvetrain layout, SRFF elements of mass,
moment of inertia, stiffness (predicted by the FEA), mechanical lash, valve spring
loads and rates, DFHLA geometry and plunger spring, and valve lift profiles. Next,
the system was altered to meet the predicted dynamic targets, by optimizing the stiffness
versus the effective mass over the valve of the CDA SRFF. The effective mass over
the valve represents the ratio between the MOI in respect to the pivot point of the
SRFF and the square distance between the valve and the SRFF pivot. The tested dynamic
performance is described in later sections.
5. DESIGN VERIFICATION AND TESTING
5.1. VALVE TRAIN DYNAMIC RESULTS
[0414] Dynamic behavior of a valvetrain is important in controlling the Noise Vibration
and Harshness (NVH) while meeting the durability and performance targets of an engine.
Valvetrain dynamics are partially influenced by the stiffness and MOI of the SRFF
component. The MOI of the SRFF can be readily calculated and the stiffness is estimated
through Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) techniques. Dynamic valve motion is also
influenced by a variety of factors, so tests were conducted gain assurance in high
speed valve control.
[0415] A motorized engine test rig was utilized for valvetrain dynamics. A cylinder head
was instrumented prior to the test. Oil was heated to represent actual engine conditions.
A speed sweep was performed from idle speed to 7500 rpm, recording data as defined
by engine speed. Dynamic performance was determined by evaluating valve closing velocity
and valve bounce. The SRFF was strain gaged for the purpose of monitoring load. Valve
spring loads were held constant to the fixed system for consistency.
[0416] Figure 111 illustrates the resultant seating closing velocity of an intake valve.
Data was acquired for eight consecutive events showing the minimum, average, and maximum
velocities relative to engine speed. The target velocity is shown as the maximum speed
for seating velocity that is typical in the industry. The target seating velocity
was maintained up to approximately 7500 engine rpm which illustrates acceptable dynamic
control for passenger car engine applications.
5.2. TORSION SPRING VALIDATION
[0417] Torsion springs are key components for the SRFF design, especially during high speed
operation. Concept validation was conducted on the springs to validate the robustness.
Three elements of the spring design were tested for proof of concept. First, load
loss was documented under the conditions of high cycling at operating temperature.
Spring load loss, or relaxation, represents the reduction of the spring load at end
of test from beginning of test. The load loss was also documented by applying highest
stress levels and subjecting parts to high temperatures. Second, the durability and
the springs were tested at worst case load and cycled to validate fatigue life, as
well as the load loss as mentioned. Finally, the function of the lost motion springs
were validated by using lowest load springs and verifying that the DFHLA does not
pump up during all operating conditions in CDA mode.
[0418] The torsion springs were cycled at engine operating temperatures in the engine oil
environment on a targeted fixture test. Torsion springs were cycled with the full
stroke of the application with the highest preload conditions to represent worst case
stress. The cycling target value was set at 25 million and 50 million cycles. Torsion
springs were also subjected to a heat-set test in which they were loaded to highest
application stress and held at 140° C for 50 hours and measured for load loss.
[0419] Figure 112 summarizes the load loss for both the cycling test and the heat set test.
All parts passed with a maximum load loss of 8% while the design target was set to
10% maximum load loss.
[0420] The results indicated a maximum load loss of 8% and met the design target. Many of
the tests showed minimal load loss near 1%. All tests were safely within the design
guidelines for load loss.
5.3. PUMP-UP ROBUSTNESS DURING CYLINDER DEACTIVATION
[0421] Torsion springs 1124 (Figure 99) are designed to prevent the HLA pump-up to preserve
the latch lash 1205 (Figure 108) when the system operates in no-lift mode. The test
apparatus was designed to sustain engine oil pressure at the lash compensation pressure
port over the range of oil temperatures and engine speed conditions where mode switching
is required.
[0422] Validation experiments were performed to prove torsion spring 1124 ability to preserve
latch lash 1205 at required conditions. The tests were conducted on motorized engines,
with instrumentation for measuring the valve and the CDA SRFF motion, oil pressure
and temperature at the lash compensation pressure port 512 (Figure 88) and switching
pressure port 506 (Figure 88).
[0423] Low limit lost motion springs were used to simulate worst condition. This test was
conducted at 3500 rpm which represents the maximum switching speed. Two operating
temperatures were considered of 58° C and 130° C. Test results show pump-up at pressures
25% higher than the application requirement.
[0424] Figure 113 shows the lowest pump-up pressure measured 1540, which is on the exhaust
side at 58° C. Pump-up pressure for the intake at 58°C and 130°C and exhaust at 130°C
were higher than the pump-up pressure of the exhaust side at 58°C. The SRFF was in
switching mode, having events on normal-lift and events in no-lift mode. Proximity
probes were used to detect valve motion in order to validate the SRFF mode state at
corresponding pressure at the switching pressure port 506. The pressure in the lash
compensator port 512 was gradually increased and switching from no-lift mode to normal-lift
mode was monitored. The pressure at which the system ceased to switch was recorded
as pump-up pressure 1540. The system safely avoids pump-up pressures when the oil
pressure is maintained at or below 5 bar for the SRFF design. Concept testing was
conducted with specially procured high limit torque torsion spring to simulate the
worst case fatigue design margin condition. The concept testing conducted on the high
load torsion spring met the required design goal.
5.4. VALIDATION OF MECHANICAL LASH DURING SWITCHING DURABILITY
[0425] Mechanical lash control is important to valvetrain dynamic stability and must be
maintained through the life of the engine. A test with loading of the latch and switching
between normal-lift mode and no-lift mode was considered appropriate to validate the
wear and the performance of the latch mechanism. Switching durability was tested by
switching the latch from the engaged to disengaged position, cycling the SRFF in no-lift
mode, engaging the latch with the inner arm and cycling the SRFF in normal-lift mode.
One cycle is defined to disengage and then re-engage the latch and exercise the SRFF
in the two modes. The durability target for switching is 3,000,000 cycles. 3,000,000
cycles represents the equivalent of one engine life. One engine life is defined as
an equivalent of 200,000 miles which is safely above the 150,000 mile standard. Parts
were tested at highest switching speed target of 3500 engine rpm to simulate worst
case dynamic load during switching.
[0426] Figure 114 illustrates the change in mechanical lash at periodic inspection points
during the test. This test was conducted on one bank of a six cylinder engine fixture.
Since there are three cylinders per bank and four SRFF's per cylinder, twelve profiles
are shown. The mechanical lash limit change of 0.020 mm was established as the design
wear target. All SRFF's show a safe margin of lash wear below the wear target at the
equivalent of the vehicle life. The test was extended to 25% over the life target
at which time parts were approaching the maximum lash change target value.
[0427] The valvetrain dynamics, Torsion spring load loss, pump-up validation and mechanical
lash over an equivalent engine life all met intended targets for the SRFF. The valvetrain
dynamics, in terms of closing velocity, is safely within the limit at maximum engine
speed of 7200 rpm and at the limit for a higher speed of 7500 rpm. The LMS load loss
showed a maximum loss of 8% which is safely within the design target of 10%. A pump-up
test was performed showing that the SRFF design operates properly given a target oil
pressure of 5 bar. Finally, the mechanical lash variation over an equivalent engine
lift is safely within the design target. The SRFF meets all design requirements for
cylinder deactivation on a gasoline passenger car application
6. CONCLUSIONS
[0428] Cylinder deactivation is a proven method to improve fuel economy for passenger car
gasoline vehicles. The design, development, and validation of a single-lobe SRFF based
cylinder deactivation system was completed, providing the ability to improve fuel
economy by reducing the pumping losses and operating a portion of the engine cylinders
at higher combustion efficiencies. The system preserves the base architecture of a
standard Type II valvetrain by maintaining the same centerlines for the engine valves,
camshaft and lash adjusters. The engine cylinder head requires the addition of the
OCV and oil control ports in the cylinder head to allow for hydraulic switching of
the SRFF from normal lift mode to deactivation mode. The system requires one OCV per
engine cylinder, and is typically configured with four identical SRFF's for the intake
and exhaust, along with one DFHLA per SRFF.
[0429] The SRFF design provides a solution that reduces system complexity and cost. The
most important enabling technology for the SRFF design is the modification to the
lost motion torsion spring. The LMS was designed to maintain continuous contact between
a single lobe camshaft and the SRFF during both normal-lift and no-lift modes. Although
this torsion spring requires slightly more packaging space, the overall system becomes
less complex with the elimination of a three lobe camshaft. The axial stack up of
the SRFF is reduced from a three-lobe CDA design since there are no outer camshaft
lobes that increase the chance of edge loading on the outer arm sliding pads and interference
with the inner arm. Rocker arm stiffness levels for the SRFF are comparable with standard
production rocker arms.
[0430] The moment of inertia was minimized by placing the heavier components over the end
pivot that sits directly on the DFHLA, namely the latching mechanism and the torsion
springs. This feature enables better valvetrain dynamics by minimizing the effective
mass over the valve. The system was designed and validated to engine speeds of 7200
rpm during standard lift mode and 3500 rpm for cylinder deactivation mode. The components
also were validated to at least one engine life that is equivalent to 200,000 engine
miles.
III. VVA ENGINE AND CYLINDER HEAD ARRANGEMENTS
1. SWITCHING ROCKER ARM ASSEMBLIES
1.1. Description - General Engine Structure
[0431] Figures 115 and 116 illustrate a partial engine head assembly that is a conventional
Type II, dual overhead cam internal combustion engine with the exhaust cam. Exhaust
cam rockers, valves and a portion of the intake valve camshaft are removed for clarity.
It should be noted here that the present teachings are equally applicable to other
engine designs having similar arrangements and obstructions.
[0432] A plurality of cam towers 10 extend upward having a cam tower bottom 33 section that
extends upward from the cylinder head. The upper side of the cam tower bottom 33 has
a semi-circular recess.
[0433] A cam tower cap 11 is bolted to the cam tower bottom 13. The cam tower cap 11 has
a similar semi-circular recess facing downward such that when the cam tower cap 11
is bolted to the cam tower bottom 13, the recesses create a circular cam recess 321
that receives the camshafts. Cam recesses 321 are sized and constructed to secure
but allow the intake and exhaust camshafts to freely rotate.
[0434] Spark plug tubes 20 in this aspect of the present teachings are located between the
cam towers 10 and parallel to a centerline 19 passing through the center of the cylinder
head. The spark plug tubes 20 extend downward through the cylinder head into the top
of each engine cylinder and is designed to receive a spark plug.
1.2. VVA Switching Rocker Arm Arrangements
1.2.1.Symmetrical Arrangements
[0435] This engine head assembly shown in Figures 115 and 116 has enough space to accept
a symmetrical variable valve lift (VVL) rocker arm assembly 100 as previously described.
[0436] The VVL rocker arm assembly 100 will be used for the remainder of the description
provided here; however, it is understood that these aspects of the present teachings
may be applied to various other rocker arm assemblies installed on heads having small
clearances on one side of the rocker assemblies.
[0437] This VVL rocker arm assembly 100 is driven by a camshaft having three lobes per cylinder.
It is shown here in Figures 115 and 116 with the camshafts removed except a middle
cam lobe 324 and an outer cam lobe 326 remain and are shown. In this aspect of the
present teachings, a rocker arm assembly 100 is shown that has an inboard end 101
(or a first end 101) and an outboard end 103 (or a second end 103). The term 'inboard'
refers to a direction inward toward centerline 19 and 'outboard' refers to a direction
outward away from the centerline 19.
[0438] As seen in Figure 116, it is seen that the VVL rocker arm assembly 100 inboard end
101 is supported by a hydraulic lash adjuster 340. The outboard end 103 rests upon
valve stem 350.
[0439] As middle cam lobe 324 turns and presses downward onto the VVL rocker arm assembly
100, it causes outboard end 103 of VVL rocker arm assembly 100 to push valve stem
350 downward opening the poppet valve connected to valve stem 350. When an internal
latch is operated by providing high-pressure oil to it, the VVL rocker arm assembly
100 causes the valves to lift according to the shape of the outer cam lobes 326. This
is further described below in connection with Figure 117.
1.2.2 Non-Symmetrical Arrangements
[0440] In Figure 117, the torsion springs 135, 137 and spring posts 141, 143 make the VVL
rocker arm assembly 100 wider at its first end as compared with a standard rocker
arm. The design of the VVL rocker arm assembly 100 (and that of the CDA rocker arm)
is wider than standard rocker arms and can fit in only certain cylinder heads. There
is enough clearance in the cylinder heads shown in Figures 115 and 116, however, in
certain engine heads, there is not enough clearance from other structures, such as
a cam tower or spark plug tube, and this VVL rocker arm assembly 100 could not be
used.
[0441] As indicated above, it is very costly to redesign/modify cylinder heads, cam drives
and gear trains. Also, many different manufacturers may make equipment based upon
the standard design of the cylinder head, making it very difficult to change or modify
the cylinder head.
[0442] Therefore, the present teachings can be embodied in VVA rocker arm assemblies that
are specially designed to fit cylinder heads having little clearance.
[0443] In many cylinder head designs, it was determined that there was only a lack of space
in one side of the rocker. Typically, the lack of space can occur in the inboard end
101 on the side of the rocker near the spark plug tubes 20. Therefore, it would be
viable to package the VVL rocker arm assembly 100 in a redesigned form so that the
width on the obstructed side would not be wider than that of a standard rocker arm.
[0444] The result was to create modified rocker assemblies for use on cylinder heads that
have obstructions on the right-hand side of the rocker assemblies, or left-hand rocker
assemblies. In the left-hand rocker assembly most of the functional elements are moved
from the right-hand side to the left-hand side. Also, the right-hand side is formed
to have reduced width.
[0445] Similarly, right-hand rocker assemblies are designed for use when there is an obstruction
on the left-hand side. Similarly, structures are moved from the left-hand side to
the right-hand side and the left-hand side is formed to create increased clearance
on the left side to compensate for the obstruction. Collectively, they will be referred
to as modified rocker assemblies.
[0446] A novel modified rocker assembly 400 according to one aspect of the present teachings
is described in connection with Figures 118-122.
[0447] Figure 118 is a perspective view of a left-handed modified rocker assembly 400 exhibiting
variable valve lift, according to one aspect of the present teachings.
[0448] Figure 119 is top plan view of the modified rocker assembly 400 of Figure 118.
[0449] Figure 120 is a side elevational view of the modified rocker assembly 400 of Figures118-119.
[0450] Figure 121 is an end-on elevational view of the modified rocker assembly 400 of Figures
118-120 as viewed from its hinge (first) end.
[0451] Figure 122 is an end-on elevational view of the modified rocker assembly 400 of Figures
118-121 as viewed from its latch (second) end.
[0452] The modified rocker assembly 400 shown here for illustrative purposes is a variable
valve lift (VVL) rocker assembly; however, a cylinder deactivation (CDA) rocker assembly
or other rocker assembly employing torsion springs on its first end 408, or otherwise
having a widened first (or hinged) end 408 fall within the scope of the present teachings.
[0453] This rocker assembly functions in a very similar manner as that shown in Figure 117
and described above, and the VVL Rocker Application. The modified rocker assembly
400 employs an inner structure 410 that fits inside of an outer structure 420. However,
this modified rocker assembly 400 is used on cylinder heads having less clearance
near the rocker assembly. The modified rocker assembly 400 includes many ornamental
aspects apart from the functional aspects disclosed herein.
[0454] Inner structure 410 can have an axle recess 413 passing through its first end 408.
The outer structure 420 also can have an axle recess 433 through its first end 408.
When the roller axle recesses 413, 433 are aligned with the inner structure 410 inside
of the outer structure 420, the axle 434 can be secured through the axle recesses
413, 433 allowing inner structure 410 to pivot relative to outer structure 420 about
axle 434.
[0455] The outer structure 420 on the obstructed side 405, as it extends from the second
end 409 toward the first end 408, can be offset toward the non-obstructed side 407
creating a first offset portion 428. This offset can be a curved or angled sidearm
that can create a smaller width at the first end 408. This first offset portion 428
can provide additional clearance on the obstructed side 405 as compared with standard
VVL or CDA rocker arm assemblies. This can now allow the modified rocker assembly
400 to fit into and function with cylinder heads that have narrow obstruction region
such as obstruction region 600 of Figs 132, 133.
[0456] The outer structure 420 on the non-obstructed side 407, as it extends from the second
end 409 toward the first end 408, can be offset outward away from the modified rocker
assembly 400 creating a second offset portion 429. This second offset portion 429
can provide additional clearance on the non-obstructed side 407 as compared with standard
VVL or CDA rocker arm assemblies, to allow the incorporation of a second torsion spring
437. This now can allow the modified rocker assembly 400 to exert the proper amount
of force to bias the inner structure 410 with respect to the outer structure 420.
In an alternative aspect of the present teachings, a single larger torsion spring
can be used in place of the two or more torsion springs shown here.
[0457] The modified rocker assembly 400 employs a latch assembly 500 with a latch pin 501
that can hold the inner structure 410 and outer structure 420 together so they move
as a single rocker. The latch assembly 500 can be activated by an oil control valve
(not shown) that can provide increased oil pressure through a cup 448 pivoting upon
the hydraulic latch adjuster 340. This is further described in connection with Figures
126, 127.
[0458] Since there are now two (or more) torsion springs 435, 437 on the non-obstructed
side 407 (or here is a single larger torsion spring) with no torsion springs on the
obstructed side 405, there will be a twisting force placed upon the inner structure
410 and outer structure 420 of the rocker assemblies. Therefore the amount of play
about the axle 434 can be adjusted to make sure that the modified rocker arm 400 functions
correctly.
[0459] When using two torsion springs 435, 437, torsion spring 435 is considered a right-hand
side spring and is wound in the opposite direction of torsion spring 437. These different
springs null out some of the torsional forces.
[0460] If only a single torsion spring is to be used, the additional torsional forces should
be considered when designing the inner and outer structures 410, 420.
[0461] For the double torsion spring and single torsion spring designs, the relative strength
of the inner and outer structures 410, 420 can be adjusted to reduce flexing, to ensure
proper performance. Also the weight distribution of each of the structures along their
length can be configured to provide the proper strength and structure while minimizing
the inertial force required to pivot the modified rocker assembly 400 at the speed
required to operate an engine. The inner and outer structures 410, 420 include many
ornamental aspects apart from the functional aspects disclosed herein.
[0462] Figure 122 shows the latch pin seat 485 that receives and holds latch pin 501 when
it is in the extended position. Latch pin 501 and latch pin seat 485 can hold inner
structure 410 from fitting into outer structure 420. Even though the latch pin is
shown as a round shape, it may have a flat end that corresponds to a flat seat. The
latch pin 501 and latch pin seat 485 can have any complementary shape that allows
them to fit properly together.
[0463] Figure 123 is a plan view from above the outer structure 420 showing the first and
second offset areas 428, 429. Here the differences from the outer structure of the
rocker assembly of Figure 117 can be seen. The first outer side arm 421 near the first
end 408 can be skewed to the left to accommodate an obstruction on the right side
of the first end of rocker assembly 400. Similarly, the second outer side arm 422
can also be skewed to the left to also accommodate an obstruction on the right side
of the first end of rocker assembly 400, keeping the first and second outer side arms
roughly the same distance from each other as they extend from the second end 409 toward
the first end 408. This can create the offset areas 428 and 429.
[0464] Figure 124 is a plan view from below the outer structure 420 of Figure 123 also showing
the first and second offset areas 428, 429. This also shows a lower cross arm 439.
The lower cross arm 439 can be shown to add strength to counteract forces and help
prevent flexing that may otherwise occur, due to the non-symmetric design of the modified
rocker assembly 400.
[0465] Latch pin seat 485, discussed in connection with Figure 122 above, is also visible
from this view.
[0466] Figure 125 is a side elevational view of an outer structure 420 according to one
aspect of the present teachings. The first outer side arm 421 and first offset portion
428 are visible in this view.
[0467] Figure 126 is a perspective view of top side of an inner structure 410 according
to one aspect of the present teachings.
[0468] Figure 127 is a perspective view of bottom side of the inner structure 410 of Figure
126. Axle recess 413 is shown that can receive axle 434 and can pivotally connect
the inner structure 410 to the outer structure 420. In both Figures 126 and 127, roller
axle apertures 483 and 484 can receive the roller axle (not shown) to hold roller
415. In Figure 127, cup 448 can receive the hydraulic lash adjuster 340 of Figure
116. The hydraulic lash adjuster (340 of Figure 116) is provided with oil flow from
an oil control valve (not shown). The hydraulic lash adjuster 340 has an oil outlet
that can provide the oil flow into cup 448. Cup 448 can be connected to internal passageways
that provide the oil to galleries 444 and 446. The oil galleries can be connected
by internal passageways to latch assembly 500. An oil pressure provided by the oil
control valve greater than a threshold pressure can cause the latch assembly 500 to
be switched. The latch pin (501 of Figures 120-122) can be set to its normal position
(with low oil pressure) in a retracted position. When the oil pressure greater than
a threshold amount is provided to the latch, it can switch to extend latch pin (501
of Figures 120-122). This is a 'normally unlatched' configuration.
[0469] Alternatively, at low oil pressure, the latch pin can normally be in an extended
position. When the oil pressure increases above a threshold amount, the latch pin
can be retracted. This is a 'normally latched' design.
[0470] Figure 128 is a plan view from the top side of the inner structure of Figures 126-127.
[0471] Figure 129 is a plan view from the bottom side of the inner structure of Figures
126-128.
[0472] In Figure 129, the valve stem seat 417 is shown. Valve stem seat 417 presses against
the engine valve stem, actuating the valve when the modified rocker assembly 400 pivots.
[0473] Figure 130 is an end-on elevational view of the inner structure 410 of Figures 126-129
as viewed from its hinge (first) end.
[0474] Figure 131 is an end-on elevational view of the inner structure 410 of Figures 126-130
as viewed from its latch (second) end.
[0475] In Figures 128-131 spring post 447 is shown. One or more of the first torsion springs
435, 437 fit over and can be held in place by the spring post 447. A single larger
torsion spring may also be used in place of first and second torsion springs 435,
437.
[0476] Figure 132 is a perspective view of the modified rocker assembly 400 of Figures 118-122
as it would appear installed in a cylinder head.
[0477] As with Figures 115 and 116, parts have been removed for clarity. Most notably, the
shaft portion of a camshaft having three lobes per engine valve has been removed.
The middle cam lobe 324 and one outer cam lobe 326 are shown. Since one of the side
lobes is not shown, the second slider pad 426 is visible. This and the second slider
pad can ride on the outer cam lobes 326 as described in the VVL Rocker Application
above.
[0478] The camshaft would be secured by and pass through the cam tower 10. Here it can be
easily seen that spark plug tube 20 would interfere with a standard CDA or VVL rocker
assembly at the obstruction region 600. The first offset portion 428 of the modified
rocker assembly 400 is adjacent to the spark plug tube 20 at obstruction region 600.
Due to its reduced width, it is now able to fit on this head and function without
colliding into the spark plug tube 20.
[0479] Figure 133 is a perspective view from another viewpoint of the modified rocker assembly
400 of Figures 118-122, as it would appear installed in a cylinder head.
[0480] This shows the same structures as Figure 120, but from a viewpoint above, and closer
to the centerline of the cylinder head, viewing the non-obstructed side 407 of the
modified rocker assembly 400. Middle cam lobe 324 is pressing down roller 415.
[0481] First offset portion 428 is shown near the obstruction region 600 adjacent to the
spark plug tube 20 providing the required clearance.
Second offset portion 429 is also shown providing the additional space for both torsion
springs 435, 437.
2. CYLINDER HEAD ARRANGEMENTS AND ASSEMBLIES
2.1. Cylinder Head Arrangements, General
[0482] As described in previous sections, many engines have designs that incorporate components
from multiple manufacturers. Thus, it is desirable to design VVA technologies to work
within a predefined cylinder head space, for example, the previously described CDA
and VVL switching rocker arms that are modified with an offset design to avoid cylinder
head obstructions. In some cases, it is not possible or desirable to change a proven
switching rocker arm design so that it can be used in an engine assembly. In such
cases, it may be desirable to make limited modifications to specific cylinder head
assemblies.
2.2. Cylinder Head Arrangements Modified for Switching Rocker Arms
[0483] A cylinder head arrangement is described that positions camshaft supports in locations
that provide additional space for wider rocker assemblies, such as switching rocker
assemblies without requiring the use of a camshaft carrier. The use of a camshaft
carrier typically adds significant cost to the assembly.
[0484] It is understood that the teachings of the current application apply to various engines,
such as an in-line four cylinder engine having four adjacent in-line cylinders, a
three-cylinder head of a 6-cylinder engine, or other engine designs. The current invention
will also apply to an overhead cam V8 engine having two sets of four in-line cylinders.
The current invention will also apply to various switching rocker arm assemblies.
[0485] Figure 139 is a plan view of a head assembly 41 conventional in-line four cylinder engine having
2 intake valves and 2 exhaust valves per cylinder with its valve cover removed. An
in-line four cylinder engine will be described; however, it will be apparent to those
of ordinary skill in the art how this will also apply to 4 cylinder halves of V8 engines.
[0486] Each cylinder of the in-line four cylinder engine is numbered from cylinder 1 on
the left through cylinder 4 on the right. Cylinders 1 and 4 are the outboard, or end
cylinders, while cylinders 2 and 3 are considered the middle cylinders. Figure 1 shows
cylinder 1 as the left end cylinder, cylinder 4 is the right end cylinder, cylinder
2 is referred to as the left middle cylinder and cylinder 3 is referred to as the
right middle cylinder. This terminology will be useful since it will also cover the
V8 engine as well as the in-line four cylinder engine.
[0487] For reference, the top of the Figure 139 is considered the front of the engine with
the bottom of the figure being the rear of the engine.
[0488] A line through cylinder 1 from front to back of the engine is marked with reference
number 21. A cam tower 10 is located on, or near line 21, near the rear of the engine,
for securing the intake camshaft 36 that is also shown in phantom below intake rocker
arms 51. The cam towers 10 employ cam bearings and a cam tower cap 11 that stabilize
the camshafts and allow them to rotate during operation.
[0489] Similarly, another cam tower 10 is located on, or near line 21, near the front of
the engine, for securing the exhaust cam 40 under the exhaust rocker arms 61.
[0490] A line through cylinder 2 from front to back of the engine is marked line 23. A cam
tower 10 is located on, or near line 23, near the rear of the engine, for securing
the intake cam 30. Similarly, another cam tower 10 is located on, or near line 23,
near the front of the engine securing the exhaust cam 40.
[0491] There are also other cam towers 10 located near the rear and front of the engine
on lines 25 and 27 passing through cylinders 3 and 4, respectively, for securing the
intake cam 30, and exhaust cam 40, respectively.. There are also end supports33 and
34 on the left and right sides of the exhaust camshaft, and end support 35 on the
left side of the intake camshaft. In this embodiment, the right side of the intake
camshaft has no end support.
[0492] In this design, the available space between cam towers 10 is generally about 77 mm.
A VVA switching rocker arm assembly typically has a width of approximately 29 mm.
Two side-by-side VVA switching rocker arm assemblies, as mounted, will not fit in
this space with a cam tower. Therefore, this typical in-line four cylinder engine
could not accommodate these VVA switching rocker arm assemblies.
[0493] Similarly, a V8 engine having overhead cams should have two heads similar to those
shown in Figure 139. The same problem arises with the use of wider rocker arms or
assemblies in the case of the V8 engines.
[0494] One solution is to move the cam towers 10 between cylinders outward away from the
VVA rocker arm assemblies. This solution makes it difficult to reach head bolts since
the head bolts are also between cylinders. It is beneficial to allow free access to
as many of the head bolts as possible, since the head is typically removed as a single
piece with the cams and rocker arms in place.
[0495] Another solution is to add a camshaft carrier that encompasses all the camshaft support
bearings, and is assembled after the head is bolted to the engine block. But this
solution has been shown to be costly and adds extra sealing joints that can be leakage
paths over the life of the engine.
[0496] According to the teachings of the present application, wider rocker arms are allowed
to be used on several cylinders in small engines without using a full camshaft carrier
arrangement. In the first embodiment, this is accomplished without any additional
camshaft support pieces.
[0497] In a second embodiment, the wider rocker arm is accommodated using a simple camshaft
support piece that can also serve as an oil control valve (OCV) mounting surface with
requisite oil control gallery drillings. The OCV is an ON/OFF hydraulic valve used
in conjunction with the VVA rocker arms that enables the VVA function.
[0498] It has been determined that the camshaft span between supports may be extended past
77 mm. without causing excessive flexing, vibration, or wear.
[0499] By revising the placement of the camshaft support towers, a larger unsupported span
between tower spacing is produced. The spacing increase is kept to a reasonable amount,
typically up to 129 mm. without the significant adverse effects indicated above.
[0500] The larger spans create additional space for the rocker arm assemblies and can now
accommodate the wider VVA rocker arm assemblies.
[0501] It is also understood that the embodiments shown and described here are exemplary
and not limiting. The present design can employ various other parts near the camshaft
that require additional spacing.
[0502] The VVA rocker arm assemblies may be VVL SRFF or CDA SRFF rocker assemblies 130,
which may be collectively referred to as a variable valve actuation switching roller
finger follower ("VVA SRFF").
[0503] Figure 139 shows a VVA SRFF 300 that is similar to the VVL SRFF 100 described above.
(An example of a cylinder deactivation single lobe ("CDA") 1100 is also described
and shown later.) The VVA SRFF 300 includes an inner rocker arm (122 of Figure 15)
that fits inside of and is pivotally connected to an outer rocker arm (120 of Figure
15). The inner rocker arm 122 and outer rocker arm (120 of Figure 15) are pivotally
connected with a pivot axle 118 at a rear end 103 of the VVA SRFF 300.
[0504] Torsion springs 134 and 136 rotationally bias the inner rocker arm 122 relative to
the outer rocker arm 124.
[0505] Slider pads 131 and 132 each ride on a cam surface. Roller 129 rides on a different
cam from that of the slider pads 131, 132. The VVL SRFF is designed to switch a latch
pin 200 of a latch 201to change between a low valve lift and a high valve lift, altering
the performance of the engine.
[0506] The slider pads 131, 132, pivot axle 118 and springs 134, 136 add additional width
to the VVA SRFF 300 and therefore require additional clearance on the head.
[0507] A CDA SRFF is described in the "CDA SRFF Application" listed above. It is also wider
than conventional rocker arm assemblies and will benefit from the current invention.
[0508] Figure 140 is a plan view of a cylinder head design according to one embodiment of
the teachings of the present application.
[0509] This embodiment is directed to installing VVA SRFF 300 on outboard, or end cylinders
1 and 4. Figure 140 shows regions 301 indicated by cross hatching where cam towers
10 of a conventional head design would have been located, but are not present in this
embodiment. Here it can be seen that the prior art intake rocker arms 51 and exhaust
rocker arms 61 are narrower than the VVA SRFF rocker arms 130.
[0510] The portion of the exhaust camshaft 40 extending over the left end cylinder (cylinder
1) is secured at its left end by end support 13. The portion of the exhaust camshaft
40 extending over the left end cylinder (cylinder 1) is supported on its right side
by the cam tower 10 of the left middle cylinder (cylinder 2).
[0511] Similarly, the portion of the exhaust camshaft 40 extending over the right end cylinder
(cylinder 4) is secured at its left end by the cam tower 10 of the right middle cylinder
(cylinder 3). The portion of the exhaust camshaft 40 extending over the right end
cylinder (cylinder 4) is supported on its right side by end support 15. The unsupported
span of the exhaust camshaft over the right end cylinder (cylinder 4) is approximately
126 mm. This is an acceptable unsupported span that would not affect the operation
of the engine.
[0512] Since there is no end support near cylinder 4 for the intake camshaft 30, an outboard
bearing 303 is attached at rear of cylinder head adjacent to the right end cylinder
(cylinder 4). In some cases, the intake camshaft 36 should be extended or another
piece should be attached to extend the intake camshaft 36 to be supported by the attached
outboard bearing.
[0513] It is also possible to have the bearing installed inside of the engine casing, if
space permits.
[0514] This design increases the spacing between cam towers 10 and bearing supports by approximately
64% from 77 mm of unsupported length to approximately 126 mm. of unsupported length,
assuming an engine with spacing between the center of adjacent cylinders, or cylinder
bore spacing, of 90 mm. and cam towers of 13 mm. width (typical for engine of 1.5-2.0L
displacement). Each VVA SRFF 300 can now be installed as shown in Figure 140.
[0515] Figure 141 is an elevational cross-sectional view of the head of the embodiment shown in Figure
140.
[0516] Here, the VVA SRFFs 130 are shown as they would appear installed and operating in
an engine. An end 101 of the VVA SRFFs 130 pivots about a hydraulic lash adjuster
100. Another end 103 actuates the valve stem of either the engine intake valve 70
or the engine exhaust valve 80 against the resistance of valve springs 90.
[0517] Figure 142 is a plan view of an embodiment of a modified four cylinder engine according to another
embodiment of the teachings of the present application. In this embodiment, rocker
assemblies are intended to be replaced on middle cylinders (cylinders 2 and 3).
[0518] Cam towers (10 of Figure 1) are typically located above each of the cylinders in
a conventional head design. The location of where the cam towers on a conventional
head would be located are indicated by the regions 140 in Figure 142.
[0519] A camshaft support piece 307 is mounted between middle cylinders 2 and 3. This camshaft
support piece 307 is designed to be removable to allow access to cylinder head bolts
during engine assembly. The camshaft support piece 307 may optionally include a mounting
structure to secure an oil control valve (OCV) and oil galleries to connect the OCV
to the rocker assembly. The OCV and oil galleries function to provide oil pressure
to cause switching of the rocker assembly from one mode to a second mode.
[0520] This camshaft support piece 307 includes camshaft bearings. The camshaft support
piece 307 may be pre-machined, then installed in the cylinder head prior to camshaft
bore finishing, then the cylinder head is ready for assembly. At assembly, the camshaft
support piece 307 is removed, the cylinder head is fastened to the cylinder block,
and the camshaft support piece 307 is reinstalled. Then the VVA SRFF 300 and camshafts
30, 40 are installed.
[0521] In the current invention, the spacing between cam supports are increased by approximately
58% from 77 mm. of unsupported length to approximately 122 mm. of unsupported length,
assuming an engine having a distance between centers of adjacent cylinders of approximately
90 mm. and cam towers of 13 mm. width (typical for engine of 1.5-2.0L displacement).
This results in the unsupported length of the camshafts to be 140% of the spacing
between the centers of adjacent cylinders commonly referred to as "bore spacing" or
"cylinder bore spacing". Therefore, employing a typical engine with a typical cam
shaft having a predetermined stiffness, any unsupported span of up to 140% of the
bore spacing would be an appropriate length to use. The effect of flexing of the camshafts
begins to increase as the spans get greater than 140% of the bore spacing. Longer
unsupported spans may be used, but provide increased cam flexing. Therefore, it is
conceivable to offset this span by +/- 10mm. with increased cam flexing for the longer
spans. This arrangements described above function best in cases where less than all
of the cylinder rocker arms are replaced.
[0522] Figure 143 is a plan view of another head 43 of another conventional four cylinder
in-line engine. There are no valvetrain parts shown attached to the head 43. The head
43 is attached to the engine block with head bolts that fit through the engine head
bolt recesses 32. There are four spark plug tubes 20 centered above each cylinder.
There are two intake valve guides 38 and two exhaust valve guides 39 for each cylinder
in this embodiment. The camshafts (not shown here) will rest in the semi-circular
cam bearings 32. These cam bearings are mounted on the cam towers 10. A cam tower
cap (not shown) has a semicircular shape and is intended to bolt to the top of the
cam towers 10 surrounding and securing the camshafts around their perimeters. The
left ends of the camshafts will rest in, and be secured by end support 33 and end
support 35.
[0523] HLA recesses 37 are positioned in line with the intake 38 and exhaust valve guide
recesses 39. These receive and secure the hydraulic lash adjusters (HLAs).
[0524] In Fig. 143, the width of the cam towers 10 is indicated by width "A". Also, the
width between adjacent HLA recesses 37, intake valve recesses 38 and exhaust valve
recesses 39 is indicated by width "B".
[0525] Figure 144 shows a side elevational view and a plan view from below a switching cylinder
deactivation rocker arm assembly that only requires a single cam lobe (CDA) 1100.
Here the roller bearing 1116, torsion springs 134, 136 can be seen. Typical dimensions
are shown in Figure 144. For example, the length of the CDA is 50 cm. There is 31.14
cm. between cup 1148 that receives the top end of the HLA and the valve pad 1140 that
drives the valve stem.
[0526] Figure 145 is a plan view of the cylinder head of Figure 143 with CDA rocker arm
assemblies 1100 installed on both end cylinders, 1 and 4 With the camshafts removed,
it can be more clearly seen that the CDA rocker arm assemblies are wider than the
conventional rocker arms. The cam towers adjacent the 1st and 4
th cylinders must be removed to accommodate the wider CDAs. Since the cam towers have
been removed on the end cylinders, the camshafts should be supported at their ends
by the end support 35, and an outboard bearing 303 that has been added, as shown,
for the intake camshaft, and 33 and 34 for the exhaust camshaft. These employ a similar
semicircular bearing upon which the cams rest and a semicircular cam tower cap that
bolts to the cam tower to secure the camshaft between them.
[0527] Figure 146 is a plan view of the cylinder head of Figure 143 with CDA rocker arm
assemblies 1100 installed on both middle cylinders 2 and 3. In this case the cam towers
10 for the two middle cylinders 2 and 3 are absent to allow for the additional width
of the CDAs mounted on the two middle cylinders. The camshafts then must be supported
in the center of the engine by a camshaft support piece that mounts between the two
middle cylinders. This secures the camshafts so that they may function normally.