TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present disclosure relates to a field of rail transit technology, and more particularly,
to a multi-train cooperative controlling method and system using virtual coupling.
BACKGROUND
[0002] In rail transit, tracking control is usually carried out by blocking, that is, it
is a technical method of sectioning by using a signal or a certificate to ensure trains
to operate in such a way that a certain distance must be maintained between a preceding
train and a tracking train (a block-based system). In this mode, a front controlled
train is tracked according to a block section, which has a relatively large tracking
interval, and relatively low control efficiency as affected by more control hierarchies;
in addition, the two trains are managed as independent individuals, respectively occupying
a train number and a planned line, and thus, transportation capacity of a single train
cannot be flexibly adjusted. Although existing lines adopt a train reconnection mode,
yet as affected by physical connection of a device such as a coupler, connection and
disassembly efficiency thereof is not high, so online dynamic control cannot be implemented,
and as affected by a length of a platform, physical reconnection of only two trains
can be implemented.
[0003] Patent Application No.
CN201710686257.0 discloses a virtual coupling small-group train control method; in the method, point-to-point
communication is implemented between controlled trains based on a vehicle-mounted
device, to further constitute a virtual coupling small-group. Since coupling is implemented
in a virtual mode, higher requirements are put forward for multi-train cooperative
control in the trains; a tracking strategy of a controlled train to an immediately
preceding train in the above-described patent is that: the main train follows operating
states, i.e., accelerating, cruising and decelerating of the immediately preceding
train; a control model is for closed-loop feedback control based on acceleration,
with distance deviation and speed deviation as input; and meanwhile, a relative safety
distance is calculated in real time according to a current speed as a safety restrictive
condition of the control model. However, such a tracking strategy is very simple;
during actual operation of virtual coupling trains, the trains will experience rapid
acceleration, rapid deceleration and other phenomena that cause the train to shake,
making passengers seriously uncomfortable. Such a phenomenon is especially serious
in multi-train situations, for example, 3-train grouping, 8-train grouping, and 16-train
grouping.
DE 19824013A1 discloses a method of controlling rail vehicles, e.g. calculating a target speed
and a target acceleration of a vehicle.
SUMMARY
[0004] With respect to the technical problem in the prior art that stable cooperation cannot
be achieved in multi-train virtual coupling situations, the present disclosure proposes
a multi-train cooperative controlling method using virtual coupling.
[0005] The invention is set out in the appended set of claims.
[0006] There is provided a multi-train cooperative controlling method using virtual coupling
according to claim 1, the method including:
Firstly, obtaining acceleration of a train adjacent to a controlled train, a speed
difference value between the train adjacent to the controlled train and the controlled
train, and a redundancy distance between the train adjacent to the controlled train
and the controlled train;
Secondly, determining acceleration of the controlled train according to the acceleration
of the train adjacent to the controlled train, the speed difference value between
the train adjacent to the controlled train and the controlled train, and the redundancy
distance between the train adjacent to the controlled train and the controlled train;
and
Finally, adjusting a speed of the controlled train according to the determined acceleration
of the controlled train.
[0007] There is provided a multi-train cooperative controlling system using virtual coupling
according to claim 8, the system including:
An information obtaining unit, configured to obtain acceleration of a train adjacent
to a controlled train and the controlled train, a speed difference value between the
train adjacent to the controlled train and the controlled train, and a redundancy
distance between the train adjacent to the controlled train and the controlled train;
An acceleration calculating unit, configured to determine acceleration of the controlled
train according to the acceleration of the train adjacent to the controlled train,
the speed difference value between the train adjacent to the controlled train and
the controlled train, and the redundancy distance between the train adjacent to the
controlled train and the controlled train;
A speed adjusting unit, configured to adjust a speed of the controlled train according
to the determined acceleration of the controlled train;
A communicating unit, configured to perform communication between front controlled
trains and communication between the trains and a control center; and
The control center, configured to monitor an operating state of a train group in real
time.
[0008] Through the technical solution of the present disclosure, efficient and safe operation
of the virtual coupling multi-train group is achieved. Other features and advantages
of the present disclosure will be further explained in the following description,
and partly become self-evident therefrom, or be understood through implementation
of the present disclosure. The objectives and other advantages of the present disclosure
will be achieved through the structure specifically pointed out in the description,
claims, and the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009]
FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a positional relationship of cooperative control;
FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of switching operating states;
FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of a positional relationship between two trains with
a negative redundancy distance according to the embodiment of the present disclosure;
and
FIG. 4 shows a structural diagram of a cooperative controlling system according to
an embodiment of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0010] In order to further set forth the technical means adopted for achieving a predetermined
object of the present disclosure and effects thereof, specific implementations, structures,
features and effects of the application according to the present disclosure will be
described in details in conjunction with accompanying drawings and preferred embodiments
as follows. In the following description, different phrases "one embodiment" and "an
embodiment" do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment. The scope of the invention
is defined by the claims.
[0011] In the embodiments of the present disclosure, multiple trains are no longer physically
connected by a device such as a coupler, but implement multi-train virtual coupling
by means of wireless communication such as train-to-train communication. In a virtual
coupling system, since the respective trains are not physically connected by a device
such as a coupler, but are connected in a wireless manner, a distance between the
trains or relative positions thereof will change during operation of the trains. For
example, FIG. 1 exemplarily shows a diagram of a positional relationship between multiple
trains under cooperative control in the virtual coupling system. In the present disclosure,
virtual coupling multi-train cooperation are controlled, and according to a front-rear
relationship of multi-train positions, the consecutive multiple trains are regarded
as a virtual coupling train group; when controlling a certain train in the train group,
the train may be regarded as a controlled train, and according to a state of the controlled
train and an operating state of an adjacent train thereof, control acceleration of
the controlled train is determined, so as to adjust a speed of the controlled train.
[0012] The following description of figures 1 and 2 are not according to the invention and
are present for illustration purposes only. As shown in FIG. 1, the multiple trains
include train 1...train
i-1, train
i...train N, where, train 1 may be taken as a pilot train. The embodiment of the present
disclosure are exemplarily described with two trains, i.e., train i and train
i-1, which are in a front-rear adjacent relationship among the multiple trains as an
example.
[0013] Train i, as a controlled train, has a certain distance from train
i-1, which is an immediately preceding train adjacent thereto. In the diagram,
xi and
xi-1 respectively represent positions where heads of train i and train
i-1 are located;
vi and
vi-1 respectively represent current driving speeds of train
i and train
i-1;
D(
vi,
vi-1) is an ideal distance that needs to be maintained between the two trains when the
driving speed of train i is
vi, and the driving speed of train i-1 is
vi-1; and the ideal distance is affected by a speed of the controlled train. During operation
of the trains, the distance
D(vi, vi-1) between train
i and train i-1 is a relatively ideal distance; and when the two trains maintain the
ideal distance for operation, efficient operation of the trains can be ensured, without
safety issues such as collision.
[0014] Where, the above-described ideal distance
D(
vi,
vi-1) is also related to a safety distance
d0, a train length
L, a common braking distance
Sci(
vi) of train
i, and an urgent braking distance
Sui-1(
vi-1) of train
i-1. The common braking distance
Sci(
vi) of train i depends on the current speed
vi of train i, and may be obtained by querying actual train parameters; and the urgent
braking distance
Sui-1(
vi-1) of train
i-1 depends on the current speed
vi-1 of train
i-1, and may be obtained by querying actual train parameters.
[0015] The above-described ideal distance
D(
vi,
vi-1) is specifically expressed by a formula below:

[0016] In the above-described Formula (1),
d0 is the safety distance reserved between the head of the controlled train and a tail
of the immediately preceding train when the two trains stop after the controlled train
adopts common braking, in a case where the immediately preceding train adopts urgent
braking. The safety distance
d0 is affected by brake reaction time of a driver, signal processing and transmission
delay in a train device, and a speed of the controlled train; specifically, the safety
distance
d0=(brake reaction time+signal processing and transmission delay) × controlled train
speed×safety factor, where, the safety factor is between 1 and 2.
[0017] The operation process of the multi-train system based on virtual coupling according
to the embodiment of the present disclosure is divided into different operating states
based on a distance relationship and a speed relationship between the controlled train
and the immediately preceding train; and by control means such as train speed accelerating
or decelerating, the train may switch between different operating states, to finally
achieve a balanced operating state where the controlled train and the immediately
preceding train have consistent speeds and a stable distance. For example, a table
below shows 9 operating states.
| Distance relationship |
Speed relationship |
Operating states |
Accelerating/decelerating trend analysis |
| x¡<xi-1-D(vi, vi-1) |
vi>vi-1 |
1 |
Controlled train decelerates, entering operating state 5. |
| vi=vi-1 |
2 |
Controlled train firstly accelerates, entering operating state 1; then decelerates,
entering operating state 5. |
| v¡<vi-1 |
3 |
Controlled train firstly accelerates, entering operating state 2; further accelerates,
entering operating state 1; and then decelerates, entering operating state 5. |
| xi=xi-1-D(vi, vi-1) |
vi>vi-1 |
4 |
Controlled train operates at a constant speed, to enter operating state 7. |
| vi=vi-1 |
5 |
Controlled train maintains a current operating state. If it accelerates, it will enter
operating state 7; and if it decelerates, it will enter operating state 3. |
| v¡<vi-1 |
6 |
Controlled train operates at a constant speed, to enter operating state 3. |
| xi>Xi-1-D(vi, vi-1) |
vi>vi-1 |
7 |
Controlled train firstly decelerates, entering operating state 8; further decelerates,
entering operating state 9; and finally accelerates, entering operating state 5. |
| vi=vi-1 |
8 |
Controlled train firstly decelerates, entering operating state 9; then accelerates,
entering operating state 5. |
| v¡<vi-1 |
9 |
Controlled train accelerates, entering operating state 5. |
[0018] As shown in the above table, based on a relationship between an actual distance and
the ideal distance
D(
vi,
vi-1), as well as the speed relationship between the controlled train (train i) and the
immediately preceding train (train i-1), the operating states of the train are set
to 9 types. During actual operation, a speed of the controlled train may be controlled,
for example, the speed may be increased or decreased through acceleration, so that
the controlled train enters from one operating state into another operating state;
and it should be well known to those skilled in the art that, acceleration is a positive
number when increasing the speed; while deceleration is a negative number when decreasing
the speed. Wherein, in operating state 5, the distance between the controlled train
and the immediately preceding train is the ideal distance
D(
vi,
vi-1), and operating speeds of the two are also the same, that is, the two enter a stable
operating state. If all the trains in the train group (except the pilot train) are
near the stable operating state 5, the entire train group may achieve efficient and
safe operation.
[0019] During operation of the trains, due to some objective reasons, it is necessary to
adjust the speed and the separation distance between trains, so that the controlled
train further switches between the above-described operating states and changes between
a stable operating state and an unstable operating state. For example, FIG. 2 shows
a schematic flow chart that the controlled train switches between different operating
states.
[0020] As shown in FIG. 2, in operating state 6, the distance between train i (the controlled
train) and train i-1 (the immediately preceding train) is the ideal distance
D(
vi,
vi-1), while at this time, the speed
vi of train i is less than the speed
vi-1 of train i-1; and such a speed relationship changes the distance relationship between
the front train and the rear train from
xi=
xi-1-D(
vi, vi-1) to
x¡<
xi-1-
D(
vi,
vi-1). At this time, train i enters operating state 3; in operating state 3, train i accelerates,
and after accelerating to
vi=
vi-1, it enters operating state 2. In operating state 2, train i continues accelerating
and enters operating state 1. In operating state 1,
vi>
vi-1, at this time, train i begins to decelerate, and finally makes
xi=
xi-1-D(
vi,
vi-1),
vi=
vi-1, entering stable operating state 5. At this time, the front train and the rear train
maintain the ideal distance
D(
vi,
vi-1), and have consistent speeds, that is, the two trains are in a stable, efficient
and safe operating state.
[0021] As shown in FIG. 2, in operating state 4, the safety distance between train i (the
controlled train) and train i-1 (the immediately preceding train) is the ideal distance
D(
vi,
vi-1), while at this time, the speed
vi of train i is greater than the speed
vi-1 of train i-1; and such a speed relationship changes the distance relationship between
the two trains from
xi=
xi-1-D(
vi,
vi-1) to
xi>
xi-1-D(
vi,
vi-1). At this time, train
i enters operating state 7; in operating state 7, train i decelerates, and after decelerating
to
vi=
vi-1, the train enters operating state 8. In operating state 8, train i continues decelerating
and enters operating state 9. In operating state 9,
vi<
vi-1, at this time, train
i begins to accelerate, and finally makes
xi=
xi-1-D(
vi, vi-1),
vi=
vi-1, entering stable operating state 5. At this time, the front train and the rear train
maintain the ideal distance
D(
vi,
vi-1), and have consistent relative speeds, that is, the two trains are in a stable, efficient
and safe operating state.
[0022] In the stable operating state, the front train and the rear train have consistent
relative speeds and maintain a certain ideal distance, for example, the trains are
in a stopped operating state or a high-speed stable operating state.
[0023] However, due to some objective reasons such as train departure, stop at a station,
or line speed limit, etc., a train in a stable operating state needs to break the
above-described stable operating state. Therefore, train i (the controlled train)
will enter from the stable operating state into other unstable operating state. Exemplarily,
when train i is in stable operating state 5, a front train is about to arrive at the
station, at this time, train
i-1 decelerates, and the speed
vi-1 thereof decreases, causing the speed
vi of train i to be greater than the speed
vi-1 of the immediately preceding train, at this time, train i enters from operating state
5 into operating state 4, and further enters into operating state 7; when the train
leaves the station, the speed
vi-1 of train
i-1 increases, causing the speed
vi of train i to be less than the speed
vi-1 of train
i-1, at this time, the train enters from operating state 5 into operating state 6,
and further enters into operating state 3. Exemplarily, when the train is operating
at a high speed, and the track line is in a good condition, train i may increase the
speed, at this time, the train enters from operating state 5 into operating state
3; and if the line condition is poor, train i needs to pass through at a reduced speed,
and at this time, the train enters from operating state 5 into operating state 7.
[0024] After train i enters into operating state 3 or operating state 7 as described above,
as shown in the above table and FIG. 2, it may continue to change the operating state
by control means of acceleration and deceleration and reach a stable operating state.
[0025] Among the 9 operating states as listed above, a control force (a combined force of
a driving force, a braking force, resistance, etc.) reasonably exerted on the controlled
train may accelerate or decelerate the latter, so that the controlled train may switch
between different operating states, and finally switch to stable operating state 5,
that is, when all trains in the train group are operating at a high speed, it is guaranteed
that the respective trains track one after another at a same high speed with a suitable
safety distance, or all trains in the train group stop.
[0026] In order to judge the various operating states of the trains for cooperative control,
to further achieve safe operation of the trains, during operation of the trains, the
immediately preceding train may send information such as position information, speed
information, and acceleration information thereof to the controlled train in real
time. Optionally, the controlled train may also actively detect information such as
position, speed and acceleration of the immediately preceding train in real time through
a detecting apparatus, or obtain information such as position, speed and acceleration
of the immediately preceding train through a train control system.
[0027] After the train is in one operating state, train i may switch between different operating
states by control means of speed increasing or decreasing through certain acceleration.
During acceleration and deceleration, train i dynamically adjusts its own acceleration
ai based on a redundancy distance Δ
xi and a relative speed
v̂i between the controlled train and the immediately preceding train.
[0028] In the embodiment of the present disclosure, an acceleration difference value Δ
ai of the front controlled train is calculated by using a formula below:

[0029] Where:
i=2,3,...,N;
max() means to take a maximum value between two or more;
v̂i (i>1, the controlled train) is the speed of train i relative to train i-1, v̂i=vi-vi-1;
Δxi (i>1, the controlled train) is a distance difference between train i and a position
D(vi, vi-1) after train i-1, and is an allowable redundancy distance between train i and train i-1, where, Δxi=xi-(xi-1-D(vi, vi-1)); the trains maintain the ideal distance D(vi, vi-1) during operation, but in practice, there may be the redundancy distance Δxi that deviates from the ideal distance D(vi, vi-1), in other words, Δxi is the distance between the position of train i and the position D(vi, vi-1) after train i-1; for example, FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram that the distance between the controlled
train and the immediately preceding train is greater than the ideal distance D(vi, vi-1), that is, the redundancy distance at this time is a negative number; and from the
diagram, it can be seen that, the actual distance (xi-1-xi) between the front train and the rear train is D(vi, vi-1)-Δxi;
xi is a position of the head of train i; vi is the speed of train i; ai (i>0, a non-pilot train) is the control acceleration of train i; ai-1 (i>0, a non-pilot train) is the actual acceleration of train i-1;
aacc_max is maximum driving acceleration of the train; and it should be well known to those
skilled in the art that, the driving acceleration is a positive number during driving;
abreak_c is common braking acceleration of the train; and it should be well known to those
skilled in the art that, the braking acceleration is a negative number during braking;
xm is distance deviation when a train control force reaches the maximum, and has a value
between 90 m and 120 m.
With respect to the pilot train among the trains, head position, train speed, and
actual train acceleration are respectively x1, v1 and ai ;
In the embodiment of the present disclosure, with respect to multi-train cooperative
control, information such as current head position, speed, and acceleration of the
immediately preceding train is considered, so that the controlled train efficiently
and safely follows the immediately preceding train.
[0030] After the acceleration difference between the controlled trains is obtained by using
the above-described Formula (2), train
i adjusts the acceleration of train
i according to the acceleration of train
i-1, to further change the operating state of the train; and the control acceleration
of train i is as shown in Formula (3). Through acceleration and deceleration adjustments
according to the embodiment of the present disclosure, multiple trains using virtual
coupling implement cooperative control, which greatly improves stability, comfort,
and safety of train operation.

[0031] Corresponding to the above-described method, an embodiment of the present disclosure
further provides a multi-train cooperative controlling system using virtual coupling.
As shown in FIG. 4, a control center implements data transmission with respective
trains through a train communicating unit; and data transmission between the respective
trains may be implemented through the train communicating unit. The cooperative controlling
system includes an information obtaining unit, an acceleration calculating unit, and
a speed adjusting unit, wherein, the information obtaining unit is configured to obtain
acceleration of an immediately preceding train, a speed difference value between the
immediately preceding train and a controlled train, and a redundancy distance between
the immediately preceding train and the controlled train; the acceleration calculating
unit is configured to determine control acceleration of the controlled train according
to the acceleration of the immediately preceding train, the speed difference value
between the immediately preceding train and the controlled train, and the redundancy
distance between the immediately preceding train and the controlled train; and the
speed adjusting unit is configured to adjust a speed of the controlled train according
to the determined control acceleration of the controlled train. The cooperative controlling
system further includes a communicating unit; and the communicating unit is configured
to implement data transmission between trains and between the trains and the control
center.
[0032] The embodiment of the present disclosure is exemplarily described by taking the rear
train as a controlled train that follows the front train. Yet not claimed, it is also
applicable that the front train is taken as a controlled train that makes adjustment
according to an operating state of the rear train.
[0033] In the embodiments of the present disclosure, multiple adjacent trains operating
on a same line in a same direction are organized as a whole, and the trains are no
longer independent individuals but have an internal association relationship established,
thereby breaking the concept of block section, and improving train control efficiency;
the acceleration of the rear train is determined according to the acceleration parameter
of the front train, the parameter of the speed difference value between the front
train and the rear train, and the parameter of the redundancy distance between the
front train and the rear train, thereby making the virtual coupling trains safer and
more reliable, and further reducing a tracking distance between two adjacent trains
among multiple trains; there is no physical connection between the trains, and flexibility
thereof is greatly improved.
1. A multi-train cooperative controlling method using virtual coupling, comprising:
firstly, obtaining acceleration of a train adjacent to a controlled train, a speed
difference value between the train adjacent to the controlled train and the controlled
train, and a redundancy distance between the train adjacent to the controlled train
and the controlled train;
wherein the redundancy distance Δxi is a distance difference between a train i and a position D(vi, vi-1) after a train i-1, and it is an allowable redundant distance between the train i
and the train i-1, where, Δxi =xi-(xi-1-D(vi, vi-1)), xi is a position of a head of the train i, vi is a speed of train i, the train i is the controlled train, the train i-1 is an immediately
preceding train corresponding to the train adjacent to the controlled train and the
position D(vi,vi-1) is an ideal distance that needs to be maintained between the two trains when the
driving speed of the train i is vi and the driving speed of train i-1 is vi-1;
secondly, determining an acceleration difference value between the train adjacent
to the controlled train and the controlled train, according to the speed difference
value between the train adjacent to the controlled train and the controlled train,
and the redundancy distance between the train adjacent to the controlled train and
the controlled train;
determining an acceleration of the controlled train according to the acceleration
difference value and the acceleration of the train adjacent to the controlled train;
and
finally, adjusting a speed of the controlled train according to the determined acceleration
of the controlled train;
wherein the controlled train and the the train adjacent to the controlled train communicate
via wireless communication.
2. The multi-train cooperative controlling method using virtual coupling according to
claim 1, wherein,
the acceleration difference value Δa
i between the train adjacent to the controlled train and the controlled train is specifically
determined as:

where,
i=2,3,...,N;
max() means to take a maximum value between two or more;
v̂i is a difference value between the speed vi of the controlled train and the speed vi-1 of the train adjacent to the controlled train, v̂i = vi -vi-1;
aacc_max is maximum driving acceleration of the train;
abreak_c is common braking acceleration of the train;
ai-1 is actual acceleration of the train adjacent to the controlled train; xm is distance deviation when a train control force reaches the maximum; the control
acceleration ai of the controlled train is specifically determined as:

3. The multi-train cooperative controlling method using virtual coupling according to
claim 1 or 2, wherein,
the ideal distance between the train adjacent to the controlled train and the controlled
train is determined according to a safety distance between the train adjacent to the
controlled train and the controlled train, a common braking distance of the controlled
train, and an urgent braking distance of the train adjacent to the controlled train.
4. The multi-train cooperative controlling method using virtual coupling according to
claim 3, wherein,
the common braking distance of the controlled train is obtained by querying actual
train parameters.
5. The multi-train cooperative controlling method using virtual coupling according to
any one of claims 3 to 4, wherein,
the urgent braking distance of the train adjacent to the controlled train is obtained
by querying actual train parameters.
6. The multi-train cooperative controlling method using virtual coupling according to
any one of claims 3 to 4, wherein,
the safety distance is determined according to brake reaction time, signal processing
and transmission delay, and speeds of the train adjacent to the controlled train and
the controlled train.
7. The multi-train cooperative controlling method using virtual coupling according to
claim 6, wherein,
8. A multi-train cooperative controlling system using virtual coupling, comprising
a control center, configured to monitor an operating state of a train group in real
time;
a controlled train and a train adjacent to the controlled train;
wherein the controlled train comprises:
an information obtaining unit, configured to obtain acceleration of the train adjacent
to the controlled train, a speed difference value between the train adjacent to the
controlled train and the controlled train, and a redundancy distance between the train
adjacent to the controlled train and the controlled train;
wherein the redundancy distance Δxi is a distance difference between a train i and a position D(vi, vi-1) after a train i-1, and it is an allowable redundant distance between the train i
and the train i-1, where, Δxi =xi-(xi-1-D(vi, vi-1)), xi is a position of a head of the train i, vi is a speed of train i, the train i is the controlled train, the train i-1 is an immediately
preceding train corresponding to the train adjacent to the controlled train and the
position D(vi,vi-1) is an ideal distance that needs to be maintained between the two trains when the
driving speed of the train i is vi and the driving speed of train i-1 is vi-1;
an acceleration calculating unit, configured to determine an acceleration difference
value between the train adjacent to the controlled train and the controlled train
according to the speed difference value between the train adjacent to the controlled
train and the controlled train, and the redundancy distance between the train adjacent
to the controlled train and the controlled train, wherein the acceleration calculating
unit is configured to determine an acceleration of the controlled train according
to the acceleration difference value and the acceleration of the train adjacent to
the controlled train;
a speed adjusting unit, configured to adjust a speed of the controlled train according
to the determined acceleration of the controlled train;
a communicating unit, configured to perform communication between the controlled train
and the train adjacent to the controlled train and communication between the controlled
train and the control center.
1. Kooperatives Mehrzugsteuerungsverfahren unter Verwendung von virtueller Kopplung,
umfassend:
erstens Erhalten einer Beschleunigung eines an einen gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden
Zuges, eines Geschwindigkeitsdifferenzwerts zwischen dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden
Zug und dem gesteuerten Zug und eines Redundanzabstands zwischen dem an den gesteuerten
Zug angrenzenden Zug und dem gesteuerten Zug;
wobei der Redundanzabstand Δxi eine Abstanddifferenz zwischen einem Zug i und einer Position D(vi, vi-1) nach einem Zug i-1 ist und er ein zulässiger redundanter Abstand zwischen dem Zug
i und dem Zug i-1 ist, wobei Δxi = xi-(xi-1-D(vi, vi-1)), xi eine Position einer Spitze des Zuges i ist, vi eine Geschwindigkeit des Zuges i ist, der Zug i der gesteuerte Zug ist, der Zug i-1
ein unmittelbar vorausfahrender Zug ist, der dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden
Zug entspricht, und die Position D(vi,vi-1) ein idealer Abstand ist, der zwischen den beiden Zügen eingehalten werden muss,
wenn die Fahrgeschwindigkeit des Zuges i vi ist und die Fahrgeschwindigkeit des Zuges i-1 vi-1 ist;
zweitens Bestimmen eines Beschleunigungsdifferenzwerts zwischen dem an den gesteuerten
Zug angrenzenden Zug und dem gesteuerten Zug gemäß dem Geschwindigkeitsdifferenzwert
zwischen dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zug und dem gesteuerten Zug und dem
Redundanzabstand zwischen dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zug und dem gesteuerten
Zug;
Bestimmen einer Beschleunigung des gesteuerten Zuges gemäß dem Beschleunigungsdifferenzwert
und der Beschleunigung des an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zuges; und
schließlich Einstellen einer Geschwindigkeit des gesteuerten Zuges gemäß der bestimmten
Beschleunigung des gesteuerten Zuges;
wobei der gesteuerte Zug und der an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzende Zug über drahtlose
Kommunikation kommunizieren.
2. Kooperatives Mehrzugsteuerungsverfahren unter Verwendung von virtueller Kopplung nach
Anspruch 1, wobei
der Beschleunigungsdifferenzwert Δa
i zwischen dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zug und dem gesteuerten Zug insbesondere
bestimmt wird als:

wobei
i = 2, 3, ..., N;
max() bedeutet, einen Maximalwert zwischen zwei oder mehr auszuwählen;
ν̂i ein Differenzwert zwischen der Geschwindigkeit vi des gesteuerten Zuges und der Geschwindigkeit vi-1 des an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zuges ist, ν̂i = vi - vi-1;
aacc_max die maximale Fahrbeschleunigung des Zuges ist;
abreak_c eine gemeinsame Bremsbeschleunigung des Zuges ist;
ai-1 eine Ist-Beschleunigung des an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zuges ist;
xm eine Abstandsabweichung ist, wenn eine Zugsteuerungskraft das Maximum erreicht;
die Steuerbeschleunigung ai des gesteuerten Zuges insbesondere bestimmt wird als:

3. Kooperatives Mehrzugsteuerungsverfahren unter Verwendung von virtueller Kopplung nach
Anspruch 1 oder 2, wobei
der ideale Abstand zwischen dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zug und dem gesteuerten
Zug gemäß einem Sicherheitsabstand zwischen dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden
Zug und dem gesteuerten Zug, einem gemeinsamen Bremsweg des gesteuerten Zuges und
einem dringenden Bremsweg des an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zuges bestimmt wird.
4. Kooperatives Mehrzugsteuerungsverfahren unter Verwendung von virtueller Kopplung nach
Anspruch 3, wobei
der gemeinsame Bremsweg des gesteuerten Zuges durch Abfragen von Ist-Zugparametern
erhalten wird.
5. Kooperatives Mehrzugsteuerungsverfahren unter Verwendung von virtueller Kopplung nach
einem der Ansprüche 3 bis 4, wobei
der dringende Bremsweg des an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zuges durch Abfragen
von Ist-Zugparametern erhalten wird.
6. Kooperatives Mehrzugsteuerungsverfahren unter Verwendung von virtueller Kopplung nach
einem der Ansprüche 3 bis 4, wobei
der Sicherheitsabstand gemäß einer Bremsreaktionszeit, Signalverarbeitung und Übertragungsverzögerung
und Geschwindigkeiten des an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zuges und des gesteuerten
Zuges bestimmt wird.
7. Kooperatives Mehrzugsteuerungsverfahren unter Verwendung von virtueller Kopplung nach
Anspruch 6, wobei
8. Kooperatives Mehrzugsteuerungssystem unter Verwendung von virtueller Kopplung, umfassend
eine Leitstelle, die dazu konfiguriert ist, einen Betriebszustand einer Zuggruppe
in Echtzeit zu überwachen;
einen gesteuerten Zug und einen an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zug;
wobei der gesteuerte Zug umfasst:
eine Informationserhaltungseinheit, die dazu konfiguriert ist, eine Beschleunigung
des an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zuges, einen Geschwindigkeitsdifferenzwert
zwischen dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zug und dem gesteuerten Zug und einen
Redundanzabstand zwischen dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zug und dem gesteuerten
Zug zu erhalten;
wobei der Redundanzabstand Δxi eine Abstanddifferenz zwischen einem Zug i und einer Position D(vi, VI-1) nach einem Zug i-1 ist und er ein zulässiger redundanter Abstand zwischen dem Zug
i und dem Zug i-1 ist, wobei Δxi = xi-(xi-1-D(vi, Vi-1)), xi eine Position einer Spitze des Zuges i ist, vi eine Geschwindigkeit des Zuges i ist, der Zug i der gesteuerte Zug ist, der Zug i-1
ein unmittelbar vorausfahrender Zug ist, der dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden
Zug entspricht, und die Position D(vi,vi-1) ein idealer Abstand ist, der zwischen den beiden Zügen eingehalten werden muss,
wenn die Fahrgeschwindigkeit des Zuges i vi ist und die Fahrgeschwindigkeit des Zuges i-1 vi-1 ist;
eine Beschleunigungsberechnungseinheit, die dazu konfiguriert ist, einen Beschleunigungsdifferenzwert
zwischen dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zug und dem gesteuerten Zug gemäß
dem Geschwindigkeitsdifferenzwert zwischen dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden
Zug und dem gesteuerten Zug und dem Redundanzabstand zwischen dem an den gesteuerten
Zug angrenzenden Zug und dem gesteuerten Zug zu bestimmen, wobei die Beschleunigungsberechnungseinheit
dazu konfiguriert ist, eine Beschleunigung des gesteuerten Zuges gemäß dem Beschleunigungsdifferenzwert
und der Beschleunigung des an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zuges zu bestimmen;
eine Geschwindigkeitseinstellungseinheit, die dazu konfiguriert ist, eine Geschwindigkeit
des gesteuerten Zuges gemäß der bestimmten Beschleunigung des gesteuerten Zuges einzustellen;
eine Kommunikationseinheit, die dazu konfiguriert ist, Kommunikation zwischen dem
gesteuerten Zug und dem an den gesteuerten Zug angrenzenden Zug und Kommunikation
zwischen dem gesteuerten Zug und der Leitstelle durchzuführen.
1. Procédé de commande coopérative multitrain à l'aide d'un couplage virtuel, comprenant
:
tout d'abord, l'obtention d'une accélération d'un train adjacent à un train commandé,
une valeur de différence de vitesse entre le train adjacent au train commandé et le
train commandé, et une distance de redondance entre le train adjacent au train commandé
et le train commandé ;
ladite distance de redondance Δxi étant une différence de distance entre un train i et une position D(vi,vi-1) après un train i-1, et c'est une distance redondante admissible entre le train i
et le train i-1, où Δxi = xi-(xi-1-D(vi,vi-1)), xi est une position d'une tête du train i, vi est une vitesse du train i, ledit train i est le train commandé, le train i-1 est
un train immédiatement précédent correspondant au train adjacent au train commandé
et la position D(vi,vi-1) est une distance idéale nécessitant d'être maintenue entre les deux trains lorsque
la vitesse de circulation du train i est vi et la vitesse de conduite du train i-1 est vi-1 ;
ensuite, la détermination d'une valeur de différence d'accélération entre le train
adjacent au train commandé et le train commandé, selon la valeur de différence de
vitesse entre le train adjacent au train commandé et le train commandé, et la distance
de redondance entre le train adjacent au train commandé et le train commandé ;
la détermination d'une accélération du train commandé en fonction de la valeur de
différence d'accélération et de l'accélération du train adjacent au train commandé
; et
enfin, le réglage d'une vitesse du train commandé selon l'accélération déterminée
du train commandé ;
ledit train commandé et ledit train adjacent au train commandé communiquant par l'intermédiaire
d'une communication sans fil.
2. Procédé de commande coopérative multitrain à l'aide d'un couplage virtuel selon la
revendication 1,
ladite valeur de différence d'accélération Δa
i entre le train adjacent au train commandé et le train commandé étant spécifiquement
déterminée sous la forme :

où,
i=2,3,...,N ;
max() signifie prendre une valeur maximale entre deux ou plus ;
v̂l est une valeur de différence entre la vitesse vi du train commandé et la vitesse vi-1 du train adjacent au train commandé, v̂i = vi - vi-1;
aacc_max est l'accélération d'entraînement maximale du train ;
afrein_c est l'accélération de freinage commune du train ;
ai-1 est l'accélération réelle du train adjacent au train commandé ;
xm est l'écart de distance lorsqu'une force de commande de train atteint le maximum
;
ladite accélération de commande ai du train commandé étant spécifiquement déterminée
sous la forme :

3. Procédé de commande coopérative multitrain à l'aide d'un couplage virtuel selon la
revendication 1 ou 2,
ladite distance idéale entre le train adjacent au train commandé et le train commandé
étant déterminée selon une distance de sécurité entre le train adjacent au train commandé
et le train commandé, une distance de freinage commune du train commandé, et une distance
de freinage d'urgence du train adjacent au train commandé.
4. Procédé de commande coopérative multitrain à l'aide d'un couplage virtuel selon la
revendication 3,
ladite distance de freinage commune du train commandé étant obtenue en interrogeant
les paramètres réels du train.
5. Procédé de commande coopérative multitrain à l'aide d'un couplage virtuel selon l'une
quelconque des revendications 3 à 4,
ladite distance de freinage d'urgence du train adjacent au train commandé étant obtenue
en interrogeant les paramètres réels du train.
6. Procédé de commande coopérative multitrain à l'aide d'un couplage virtuel selon l'une
quelconque des revendications 3 à 4,
ladite distance de sécurité étant déterminée en fonction du temps de réaction des
freins, du délai de traitement et de transmission du signal, et des vitesses du train
adjacent au train commandé et du train commandé.
7. Procédé de commande coopérative multitrain à l'aide d'un couplage virtuel selon la
revendication 6,
8. Système de commande coopérative multitrain à l'aide d'un couplage virtuel, comprenant
un centre de commande, conçu pour surveiller un état de fonctionnement d'un groupe
de trains en temps réel ;
un train commandé et un train adjacent au train commandé ;
ledit train commandé comprenant :
une unité d'obtention d'informations, conçue pour obtenir une accélération du train
adjacent au train commandé, une valeur de différence de vitesse entre le train adjacent
au train commandé et le train commandé, et une distance de redondance entre le train
adjacent au train commandé et le train commandé ;
ladite distance de redondance Δxi étant une différence de distance entre un train i et une position D(vi,vi-1) après un train i-1, et c'est une distance redondante admissible entre le train i
et le train i-1, où, Δxi = xi-(xi-1-D(vi,vi-1)), xi est une position d'une tête du train i, vi est une vitesse du train i, le train i est le train commandé, le train i-1 est un
train immédiatement précédent correspondant au train adjacent au train commandé et
la position D(vi,vi-1) est une distance idéale nécessitant d'être maintenue entre les deux trains lorsque
la vitesse de circulation du train i est vi et la vitesse de circulation du train i-1 est vi-1 ;
une unité de calcul d'accélération, conçue pour déterminer une valeur de différence
d'accélération entre le train adjacent au train commandé et le train commandé selon
la valeur de différence de vitesse entre le train adjacent au train commandé et le
train commandé, et la distance de redondance entre le train adjacent au train commandé
et le train commandé, ladite unité de calcul d'accélération étant conçue pour déterminer
une accélération du train commandé selon la valeur de différence d'accélération et
de l'accélération du train adjacent au train commandé ;
une unité de réglage de vitesse, conçue pour régler une vitesse du train commandé
selon l'accélération déterminée du train commandé ;
une unité de communication, conçue pour réaliser une communication entre le train
commandé et le train adjacent au train commandé et une communication entre le train
commandé et le centre de commande.