BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This disclosure relates generally to methods and systems for analyzing images of
rock samples to determine petrophysical properties.
[0002] In hydrocarbon production, obtaining accurate subsurface estimates of petrophysical
properties of the rock formations is important for the assessment of hydrocarbon volumes
contained in the rock formations and for formulating a strategy for extracting the
hydrocarbons from the rock formation. Traditionally, samples of the rock formation,
such as from core samples or drilling cuttings, are subj ected to physical laboratory
tests to measure petrophysical properties such as permeability, porosity, formation
factor, elastic moduli, and the like. As known in the art, some of these measurements
require long time periods, extending over several months in some cases, depending
on the nature of the rock itself. The equipment used to make these measurements can
also be quite costly.
[0003] Often, petrophysical rock properties are measured in the laboratory at ambient environmental
conditions, with the rock sample at room temperature and surface atmospheric pressure.
However, the sub-surface environment of the rock in the formation can differ significantly
from that of ambient laboratory conditions. For example, the weight of overburden
sedimentation on formation rock, which increases with increasing burial depth, causes
compaction of the formation rock, which is reflected in reduced porosity and permeability
as compared with surface ambient conditions.
[0004] Subsurface rock formations are also subjected to changes in
in situ stress/strain conditions as a result of hydrocarbon development and production. For
instance, the stress conditions at a point in a rock formation adjacent to a drilled
borehole will differ from the original
in situ stress conditions at that same point prior to drilling. In addition, the injection
and extraction of pore fluids, as occurs in field production, sets up changes in pore
fluid pressure from that prior to production, which also causes changes in
in situ stress conditions. Different stress or strain conditions from these and other causes
can significantly alter the petrophysical properties of rock relative to the same
rock under ambient conditions. Of course, it is the subsurface petrophysical properties
of the rock under its
in situ stress conditions that are of most interest for purposes of appraisal, development,
and production of the field.
[0005] To compensate for the effect of changes in
in situ stress, conventional laboratory measurements of porosity, permeability, electrical
conductivity, and other petrophysical properties can be physically measured in the
laboratory under a variety of stress and strain conditions. It has been observed,
however, that the equipment and technician time required to artificially apply these
physical conditions in the laboratory can be prohibitively expensive, as compared
with tests performed under room ambient conditions, and can also require significantly
more time to carry out, especially for complicated rock types. Moreover, the range
of laboratory-applied stress and strain conditions for the measurement of a particular
petrophysical property is often quite limited, and may not accurately represent the
in situ subsurface conditions.
[0006] Even if equipment for measuring rock properties under confining stresses and pressures
is available, the estimation of petrophysical properties of a given rock sample under
several different stress/strain conditions is often not possible, because the microstructure
of the rock sample may be permanently deformed by one or more of the loading and unloading
stress/strain cycles. This deformation may occur, for instance, when measuring petrophysical
properties of a given rock sample initially under hydrostatic stress conditions (
i.e., where the sample is subjected to uniform confining pressure) and then measuring
the petrophysical properties of the same rock under uniaxial stress conditions (
i.e., where stress is applied in only a single direction, with no applied stress in all
other directions). In that case, subsequent iterations of the measurement experiment
on the same sample can result in a different petrophysical property value or other
change in physical behavior that is not representative of the true stress/strain response
of the rock. The measured petrophysical properties in the second and subsequent stress
experiments may thus differ significantly from the true
in situ values sought for those stress experiments.
[0007] Because of the cost and time required to directly measure petrophysical properties,
the technique of "direct numerical simulation" has been developed for efficiently
estimating physical properties, such as porosity, absolute permeability, relative
permeability, formation factor, elastic moduli, and the like of rock samples, including
samples from difficult rock types such as tight gas sands or carbonates. According
to this approach, a three-dimensional tomographic image of the rock sample is obtained,
for example by way of a computer tomographic (CT) scan. Voxels in the three-dimensional
image volume are "segmented" (e.g., by "thresholding" their brightness values or by
another approach) to distinguish rock matrix from void space. Numerical simulation
of fluid flow or other physical behavior such as elasticity or electrical conductivity
is then performed, from which porosity, permeability (absolute and/or relative), elastic
properties, electrical properties, and the like can be derived. A variety of numerical
methods may be applied to solve or approximate the physical equations simulating the
appropriate behavior. These methods include the Lattice-Boltzmann, finite element,
finite difference, finite volume numerical methods and the like. Examples of such
methods are disclosed in, for example,
WO 2011/149808.
WO 2011/149808 is directed to a material for providing a consistent and integrated set of physical
properties of a porous specimen for modeling a reservoir. The method comprises the
steps of receiving an unprepared sample specimen of porous media, wherein the unprepared
sample specimen was extracted from the Earth. The unprepared sample specimen is prepared
for imaging, wherein the preparing results in a sample specimen. Next, the sample
specimen is imaged to generate a three-dimensional tomographic image of the sample
specimen. The tomographic image is then segmented into pixels each representing pore
space or grain, such as, for example rock grain, and the segmented image is used to
perform a set of computations for the sample specimen, wherein the set of computations
determines a plurality of physical properties, and wherein the sample specimen remains
intact throughout the method.
In addition,
US 2010/128933 discloses a method for estimating a petrophysical parameter from a rock sample, wherein
the method comprises making a three-dimensional tomographic image of the sample of
the material and segmenting the image into pixels, each representing pore space or
rock grain. The porosity of the sample is then determined from the segmented image.
An image of at least one fracture is introduced into the segmented image to generate
a fractured image. The porosity of the fractured image is then determined and at least
one petrophysical parameter related to the pore space geometry thus altered is estimated
from this fractured image.
[0008] However, conventional direct numerical simulation is generally limited to rock samples
under ambient stress/strain conditions, in that images obtained by X-ray tomographic
images or other imaging techniques (e.g., FIBSEM) are generally acquired under ambient
conditions. This is because the mechanical equipment required to induce stress/strain
conditions are not routinely attached to imaging equipment, or cannot feasibly be
so attached, due to the nature of either or both of the imaging and mechanical devices.
In those cases in which imaging and mechanical testing have been combined, such as
by using special sample holders that are transparent to X-ray tomography, such combined
experimental apparatus is highly specialized and extremely expensive, and may involve
health and safety risks.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] Embodiments of this invention provide a system and method for simulating the subsurface
conditions found in rock formations in the direct numerical simulation of physical
processes from which petrophysical properties are derived.
[0010] Embodiments of this invention provide such a system and method that substantially
reduce the time and cost of traditional laboratory tests while improving the accuracy
of those tests.
[0011] Embodiments of this invention provide such a system and method that can be implemented
into conventional test and analysis equipment.
[0012] Other objects and advantages of embodiments of this invention will be apparent to
those of ordinary skill in the art having reference to the following specification
together with its drawings.
[0013] Embodiments of this invention may be implemented into an analysis method, system,
and computer-readable medium storing executable program instructions for performing
such analysis, based on a three-dimensional (3D) image of a rock sample, in which
voxels or other portions of the 3D image corresponding to solid material in the rock
sample are differentiated from voxels or other portions of the image corresponding
to pores in that rock sample. An unstructured mesh overlaid onto the regions of the
image corresponding to the solid material, followed by the numerical application of
a simulated deformation, in the nature of stress, strain, force, displacement, or
the like, to that unstructured mesh, for example by way of boundary conditions for
a finite element system of equations. The simulated deformation can represent the
subsurface environment of the rock sample at its original location in the formation.
The effects of the simulated deformation, as represented by changes in the unstructured
mesh, are intended to emulate deformations in the rock sample at the stress or strain
levels in the sub-surface. At least one petrophysical property of the rock sample
is then numerically or analytically determined for the unstructured mesh, as deformed
by the simulated deformation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING
[0014]
Figure 1A is a generic block diagram that illustrates examples of sources of rock
samples for a testing system constructed and operating according to embodiments of
the invention.
Figure 1B is an electrical diagram, in block form, of a testing system for analyzing
rock samples according to embodiments of the invention.
Figure 1C is an electrical diagram, in block form, of the construction of a computing
device in the system of Figure 1B, according to embodiments of the invention.
Figure 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of operating a testing system in
analyzing rock samples, according to embodiments of the invention.
Figure 3A is a cross-sectional microphotograph of a rock sample to which embodiments
of the invention may be applied.
Figure 3B through 3D are digital representations of the rock sample of Figure 3A,
to which embodiments of the invention may be applied.
Figure 3E is a digital plot illustrating an unstructured mesh as applied to a digital
representation of a rock sample, before deformation.
Figure 3F is a digital plot illustrating the applied mesh of Figure 3E under an example
of simulated stress field and corresponding pore space deformation, according to embodiments
of the invention.
Figures 4A through 4F are digital representations of a rock sample, to which an embodiment
that involves the analysis of grain contact regions is applied.
Figures 4G and 4H are plots illustrating the consideration of grain contact regions
as described relative to the embodiment illustrated in Figures 4A through 4F.
Figures 5A through 5D are flow diagrams illustrating the method of Figure 2 according
to each of several embodiments of the invention.
Figure 6 is a plot of porosity of a rock sample versus volume change resulting from
displacement applied in one direction, as determined by application of an embodiment
of the invention.
Figure 7 is a comparison of cross-sectional views resulting from the conversion of
the unstructured grid after deformation by a simulated stress to structured grids
of varying resolution, according to an embodiment of the invention corresponding to
Figure 5B.
Figure 8 is a plot of directional permeability of a rock sample versus porosity, as
determined by application of an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 9 is a plot of formation factor of a rock sample versus porosity, as determined
by application of an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 10 is a plot of resistivity index of a rock sample versus water saturation,
as determined by application of an embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0015] This invention will be described in connection with its embodiments, namely as implemented
into methods, systems, and corresponding software for analyzing samples of sub-surface
formations by way of direct numerical simulation, with stress and strains numerically
applied to those samples to investigate sub-surface effects of
in situ stress and other conditions, as it is contemplated that this invention will be particularly
beneficial when utilized for such results. However, it is contemplated that the invention
can be beneficially applied to other applications, for example to replicate mechanical
laboratory testing, and to determine other physical properties beyond those described
in this specification. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the following description
is provided by way of example only, and is not intended to limit the scope of this
invention as claimed.
[0016] Embodiments of this invention are directed to systems and methods for numerical simulation
of petrophysical properties under simulated stress/strain arising from the numerical
application of stress, strain, force, or displacement boundary conditions and the
numerical solution of appropriate constitutive equations for elasticity, which relate
material stresses, strains, and other properties. More specifically, a testing system
performs an image based direct numerical simulation of the petrophysical properties
of a sample of rock, where the deformation is a result of the numerical application
of stress, strain, force, or displacement boundary conditions and the numerical solution
of the appropriate constitutive equations. Moreover, the application of specific stress,
strain, force, or displacement boundary conditions may represent one or more subsurface
conditions, such as the
in situ stress conditions experienced by the rock in its original subsurface location. Other
boundary conditions beyond stress, strain, force, and displacement, such as those
involving rotations, rate-dependent displacements or strains, and the like, as well
as those formulations that can be utilized to solve problems involving plasticity
and other non-linearities, among others, may alternatively be used in connection with
the disclosed embodiments.
[0017] While certain embodiments will be described in this specification with reference
to analysis of the effects of subsurface stress/strain conditions on the petrophysical
properties of rock, it is contemplated that these embodiments can also be utilized
to explore the general effect of different stress/strain paths on the petrophysical
properties of rock, even though such paths may or may not correspond directly to subsurface
stress/strain conditions or to the evolution of subsurface stress/strain conditions.
In particular, according to some embodiments, gradual or incremental increases in
stress or strain may be numerically applied, with petrophysical properties simulated
at each incremental step. These stress/strain conditions may stand in direct analogy
to traditional laboratory experiments designed to test the mechanical properties of
rock, such experiments including hydrostatic tests, uniaxial compression, uniaxial
strain, triaxial tests, and the like.
[0018] Figure 1A illustrates, at a high level, the acquiring of rock samples and their analysis
according to embodiments of this method. It is contemplated that embodiments of this
invention will be especially beneficial in analyzing rock samples from sub-surface
formations that are important in the production of oil and gas. As such, Figure 1A
illustrates environments 100 from which rock samples 104 to be analyzed by testing
system 102 can be obtained, according to various implementations. In these illustrated
examples, rock samples 104 can be obtained from terrestrial drilling system 106 or
from marine (ocean, sea, lake, etc.) drilling system 108, either of which is utilized
to extract resources such as hydrocarbons (oil, natural gas, etc.), water, and the
like. As is fundamental in the art, optimization of oil and gas production operations
is largely influenced by the structure and physical properties of the rock formations
into which terrestrial drilling system 106 or marine drilling system 108 is drilling
or has drilled in the past.
[0019] It is contemplated, in embodiments of this invention, that the manner in which rock
samples 104 are obtained, and the physical form of those samples, can vary widely.
Examples of rock samples 104 useful in connection with embodiments of this invention
include whole core samples, side wall core samples, outcrop samples, drill cuttings,
and laboratory generated synthetic rock samples such as sand packs and cemented packs.
[0020] As illustrated in Figure 1A, environment 100 includes testing system 102 that is
configured to analyze images 128 of rock samples 104 in order to determine the physical
properties of the corresponding sub-surface rock, such properties including petrophysical
properties in the context of oil and gas exploration and production. Figure 1B illustrates,
in a generic fashion, the constituent components of testing system 102 in performing
such analysis.
[0021] In a general sense, testing system 102 includes imaging device 122 for obtaining
two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) images, as well as other representations,
of rock samples 104, such images and representations including details of the internal
structure of those rock samples 104. An example of imaging device 122 is a X-ray computed
tomography (CT) scanner, which as known in the art emits x-ray radiation 124 that
interacts with an object and measures the attenuation of that x-ray radiation 124
by the object in order to generate an image of its interior structure and constituents.
The particular type, construction, or other attributes of CT scanner 122 can correspond
to that of any type of x-ray device, such as a micro CT scanner, capable of producing
an image representative of the internal structure of rock sample 104. In this example,
imaging device 122 generates one or more images 128 of rock sample 104, and forwards
those images 128 to computing device 120.
[0022] The form of images 128 produced by imaging device 122 in this example may be in the
form of a three-dimensional (3D) digital image volume consisting of or generated from
a plurality of two-dimensional (2D) sections of rock sample 104. In this case, each
image volume is partitioned into 3D regular elements called volume elements, or more
commonly "voxels". In general, each voxel is cubic, having a side of equal length
in the
x, y, and
z directions. Digital image volume 128 itself, on the other hand, may contain different
numbers of voxels in the
x, y, and
z directions. Each voxel within a digital volume has an associated numeric value, or
amplitude, that represents the relative material properties of the imaged sample at
that location of the medium represented by the digital volume. The range of these
numeric values, commonly known as the grayscale range, depends on the type of digital
volume, the granularity of the values (
e.g., 8 bit or 16 bit values), and the like. For example, 16 bit data values enable the
voxels of an x-ray tomographic image volume to have amplitudes ranging from 0 to 65,536
with a granularity of 1.
[0023] As mentioned above, imaging device 122 forwards images 128 to computing device 120,
which in the example of Figure 1B may be any type of conventional computing device,
for example, a desktop computer or workstation, a laptop computer, a server computer,
a tablet computer, and the like, and as such computing device 120 will include hardware
and software components typically found in a conventional computing device. As shown
in Figure 1B, these hardware and software components of computing device 120 include
testing tool 130 that is configured to analyze images 128 to determine the petrophysical
properties of rock sample 104 under one or more simulated deformation conditions,
including stress and strain conditions that may be encountered by rock formations
in the sub-surface. In this regard, testing tool 130 may be implemented as software,
hardware, or a combination of both, including the necessary and useful logic, instructions,
routines, and algorithms for performing the functionality and processes described
in further detail below. In a general sense, testing tool 130 is configured to analyze
image volume 128 of rock sample 104 to perform numerical simulation of the petrophysical
properties under the simulated deformation representing subsurface conditions of rock
formations.
[0024] Figure 1C generically illustrates the architecture of computing device 120 in testing
system 102 according to embodiments of the invention. In this example architecture,
computing device 120 includes one or more processors 902, which may be of varying
core configurations and clock frequencies as available in the industry. The memory
resources of computing device 120 for storing data and also program instructions for
execution by the one or more processors 902 include one or more memory devices 904
serving as a main memory during the operation of computing device 120, and one or
more storage devices 910, for example realized as one or more of non-volatile solid-state
memory, magnetic or optical disk drives, random access memory. One or more peripheral
interfaces 906 are provided for coupling to corresponding peripheral devices such
as displays, keyboards, mice, touchpads, touchscreens, printers, and the like. Network
interfaces 908, which may be in the form of Ethernet adapters, wireless transceivers,
or serial network components, are provided to facilitate communication between computing
device 120 via one or more networks such as Ethernet, wireless Ethernet, Global System
for Mobile Communications (GSM), Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE), Universal
Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave
Access (WiMAX), Long Term Evolution (LTE), and the like. In this architecture, processors
902 are shown as coupled to components 904, 906, 908, 910 by way of a single bus;
of course, a different interconnection architecture such as multiple, dedicated, buses
and the like may be incorporated within computing device 120.
[0025] While illustrated as a single computing device, computing device 120 can include
several computing devices cooperating together to provide the functionality of a computing
device. Likewise, while illustrated as a physical device, computing device 120 can
also represent abstract computing devices such as virtual machines and "cloud" computing
devices.
[0026] As shown in the example implementation of Figure 1C, computing device 120 includes
software programs 912 including one or more operating systems, one or more application
programs, and the like. According to embodiments of the invention, software programs
912 include program instructions corresponding to testing tool 130 (Figure 1B), implemented
as a standalone application program, as a program module that is part of another application
or program, as the appropriate plug-ins or other software components for accessing
testing tool software on a remote computer networked with computing device 120 via
network interfaces 908, or in other forms and combinations of the same.
[0027] The program memory storing the executable instructions of software programs 912 corresponding
to the functions of testing tool 130 may physically reside within computing device
120 or at other computing resources accessible to computing device 120,
i.e. within the local memory resources of memory devices 904 and storage devices 910,
or within a server or other network-accessible memory resources, or distributed among
multiple locations. In any case, this program memory constitutes computer-readable
medium that stores executable computer program instructions, according to which the
operations described in this specification are carried out by computing device 120,
or by a server or other computer coupled to computing device 120 via network interfaces
908 (
e.g., in the form of an interactive application upon input data communicated from computing
device 120, for display or output by peripherals coupled to computing device 120).
The computer-executable software instructions corresponding to software programs 912
associated with testing tool 130 may have originally been stored on a removable or
other non-volatile computer-readable storage medium (
e.g., a DVD disk, flash memory, or the like), or downloadable as encoded information
on an electromagnetic carrier signal, in the form of a software package from which
the computer-executable software instructions were installed by computing device 120
in the conventional manner for software installation.
[0028] The particular computer instructions constituting software programs 912 associated
with testing tool 130 may be in the form of one or more executable programs, or in
the form of source code or higher-level code from which one or more executable programs
are derived, assembled, interpreted or compiled. Any one of a number of computer languages
or protocols may be used, depending on the manner in which the desired operations
are to be carried out. For example, these computer instructions for creating the model
according to embodiments of this invention may be written in a conventional high level
language such as JAVA, FORTRAN, or C++, either as a conventional linear computer program
or arranged for execution in an object-oriented manner. These instructions may also
be embedded within a higher-level application.
[0029] The particular functions of testing tool 130, including those implemented by way
of software programs 912, to analyze rock samples under simulated stress and strain
conditions according to embodiments of the invention, will now be described with reference
to the flow diagram of Figure 2 in combination with Figures 1A through 1C.
[0030] In process 204, testing system 102 acquires rock sample 104 to be analyzed, such
as from a sub-surface rock formation obtained via terrestrial drilling system 106
or marine drilling system 108, or from other sources. Process 204 typically prepares
the specific rock sample 104 from a larger volume of the sub-surface rock formation,
to be of a size, dimension, and configuration that may be imaged by imaging device
122 (
e.g., a CT scanner), for example by drilling or cutting out a portion of the larger volume
of the rock formation of interest.
[0031] According to an embodiment of the invention, imaging device 122 in combination with
computing device 120 of testing system 102 generates digital image volume 128 representative
of rock sample 104, including its interior structure, in process 208. For the example
in which imaging device 122 is a CT scanner, process 208 is carried out by x-ray imaging
of rock sample 104 (
i.e., emitting radiation directed at rock sample 104 and measuring the attenuation) to
generate image volumes 128 of or from 2D slice images. Specific conventional techniques
for acquiring and processing 3D digital image volumes 128 of rock sample 104 in process
208 include, without limitation, X-ray tomography, X-ray micro-tomography, X-ray nano-tomography,
Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.
[0032] Figure 3A illustrates an example of one 2D slice image 300 of a 3D image of a rock
sample, which shows a cross-sectional slice of the structural details of that rock
sample, including the features of solid material 302 and pores or void space 304.
The image data at this point may be in the form of grayscale values representative
of the attenuation of the x-ray radiation by the constituents of rock sample 104.
While Figure 3A illustrates one 2D slice image 300, 3D digital image volume 128 of
rock sample 104 is typically composed of multiple 2D slice images at locations stepped
along one axis of rock sample 104, together forming a 3D image of rock sample 104.
The combining of the 2D slice images into 3D digital image volume 128 may be performed
by computational resources within imaging device 122 itself, or by computing device
120 from the series of 2D slice images 128 produced by imaging device 122, depending
on the particular architecture of testing system 102.
[0033] In process 210, testing system 102 performs segmentation or other image enhancement
techniques on digital image volume 128 of rock sample 104 to distinguish and label
different components of image volume 128 from the grayscale values of the image. More
specifically, computing device 120 performs this segmentation in order to identify
the significant elastic components, such as pore space and mineralogical components
(e.g., clays and quartz), that can affect the elastic characteristics of rock sample
104, such as its stress-strain response. In some embodiments, testing tool 130 is
configured to segment image volume 128 into more than two significant elastic phases,
representing such material constituents as pore space, clay fraction, quartz fraction,
and other various mineral types.
[0034] To accomplish process 210, computing device 120 can utilize any one of a number of
types of segmentation algorithms. One approach to segmentation process 210 is the
application of a "thresholding" process to image volume 128, in which computing device
120 chooses a threshold value within the voxel amplitude range. Those voxels having
an amplitude below the threshold value are assigned one specific numeric value that
denotes pore space, while those voxels having an amplitude above the threshold are
assigned another numeric value that denotes matrix space (
i.e., solid material). In this approach, thresholding process 210 will convert a grayscale
image volume to a segmented volume of voxels having one of two possible numeric values,
commonly selected to be 0 and 1. Figure 3B illustrates an example of the segmentation
performed on a 3D digital image volume in thresholding process 210. As illustrated,
segmentation allows the structural details of a rock sample to be distinguished, in
this example with the solid material 302 shown in light gray, and pores or void space
304 shown in black. Further segmentation can be applied one or more times to differentiate
various features within a grayscale image. If simple thresholding is used, multiple
threshold values can distinguish among different materials exhibiting different x-ray
attenuation characteristics, such as clay, quartz, feldspar, etc.
[0035] Computing device 120 may alternatively utilize other segmentation algorithms in process
120. An example of such an alternative algorithm is known in the art as Otsu's Method,
in which a histogram based thresholding technique selects a threshold to minimize
the combined variance of the lobes of a bimodal distribution of grayscale values (
i.e., the "intra-class variance"). Otsu's method can be readily automated, and may also
be extended to repeatedly threshold the image multiple times to distinguish additional
material components such as quartz, clay, and feldspar. Other examples of automated
segmentation algorithms of varying complexity may alternatively or additionally be
used by computing device 120 to distinguish different features of an image volume,
such algorithms including Indicator Kriging, Converging Active Contours, Watershedding,
and the like.
[0036] As part of process 210, computing device 120 may also utilize other image enhancement
techniques to enhance or improve the structure defined in image volume 128 to further
differentiate among structure, to reduce noise effects, and the like. Likewise, while
computing device 120 can perform the segmentation or other image enhancement techniques
in process 210, it is contemplated that other components of testing system 102, for
example imaging device 122 itself, may alternatively perform image enhancement process
210 in whole or in part.
[0037] Also in process 210, computing device 120 may formulate an assignment volume from
the segmented image volume 128, within which appropriate elastic parameters are assigned
to each distinct elastic phase. According to embodiments of the invention, and as
will be described in detail below, testing tool 130 will apply boundary conditions
on a meshed version of this assignment volume to represent the desired
in situ deformation under which the constitutive governing equations appropriate for linear
elasticity, viscoelasticity, plasticity, or other physical laws are to be solved to
simulate the appropriate physical response of the rock volume to the deformation.
[0038] Process 212 is an optional process by way of which testing system 102 performs grain
partitioning and grain contact identification to identify the separate grains and
contact regions between each grain of rock sample 104 as represented by image volume
128. Contact regions correspond to those portions of the surfaces of individual grains
that are in contact with other grains. In some embodiments of the invention, analysis
of the contact regions between grains and their characteristics, such as degree of
cement, rugosity, etc., is useful as these contact characteristics can have an effect
on the stress-strain response of the rock. Figures 3C and 3D illustrate examples of
the grain partitioning and grain contact identification performed on the segmented
2D slice image 300 of Figure 3B, in an instance of optional process 212. As illustrated
in Figure 3C, each unique grain in the 2D slice image is randomly shaded to a different
grayscale value to distinguish the grains from one another. The particular grayscale
value to which each individual grain is shaded reflects a unique numeric label utilized
to identify an individual grain in the solid matrix. As illustrated in Figure 3D,
the grain to grain contacts for each unique grain are highlighted with a different
grayscale value from the body of their respective grains, as a result of optional
process 212.
[0039] Process 210 (including optional process 212 if performed) thus associates the voxels
in the segmented digital image volume with the particular material (or pore space,
as the case may be) at the corresponding location within rock sample 104. In process
210 (and optional process 212 if performed), some or all of the voxels are each labeled
with one or more material properties corresponding to the particular material constituent
assigned to that voxel by processes 210, 212, such constituents including pore space,
matrix material, clay fraction, individual grains, grain contacts, mineral types,
and the like. The particular elastic or other material properties of those identified
constituents are associated with corresponding voxels to the extent useful for the
analysis to be performed,
i.e. grains and minerals within the volume are assigned appropriate densities and elastic
properties.
[0040] For instance, when individual grains, minerals, and contacts are assumed to behave
according to linear elasticity, it is useful to assign values for Young's modulus
E and Poisson's ratio
v to each voxel that is labelled as an individual grain, mineral, or contact. As known
in the art, Young's modulus is a measure of the stiffness of a material undergoing
uniaxial stress deformation that is linear (
i.e., the relationship of stress as a function of strain is linear, with a slope equal
to the value of Young's modulus
E). Also as known in the art, Poisson's ratio is a measure of the lateral and longitudinal
strain under conditions of uniaxial stress behavior. Alternatively, values for bulk
modulus
K and shear modulus
G may be assigned to grains, minerals, and contacts in the material to describe the
elastic behavior of those components. As known in the art, bulk modulus is a measure
of the elastic response of a material to hydrostatic pressure, while shear modulus
is a measure of the elastic response of a material to shear strains. As known in the
art, all of these elastic coefficients are interrelated with one another by way of
well-known transforms. For those cases in which linear elastic materials are concerned,
Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio will typically be ascribed to components of the
material because values for these parameters can be determined directly through experiments.
[0041] In circumstances where minerals, grains, or contacts are assumed to exhibit viscoelastic
behavior, such that the deformation in response to an applied stress or strain is
rate dependent, it is necessary to assign appropriate model parameters, like stiffness
and viscosity, if for example Maxwell materials are assumed. There are a multitude
of other constitutive models known in the art that are appropriate for viscoelastic
and plastic materials, and which may be utilized to describe various types of stress/strain
behavior. In any case, the model parameters assigned to the materials should be those
appropriate for the specific constitutive model that is assumed.
[0042] Process 214 is then executed by testing system 102 to generate a finite element mesh
for the solid material (or for the partitioned identified grains and contact regions
from process 212) in the segmented 3D image volume of rock sample 104. In embodiments
of this invention, computing device 120 executes testing tool 130 to create this finite
element mesh as an unstructured mesh applied to the segmented 3D image volume. This
finite element mesh is "unstructured" in the sense that it consists of a number of
polygonal elements in an irregular pattern (
i.e., with irregular connectivity), in contrast to a "structured" mesh of polygonal elements
in a regular pattern (
i.e., with regular connectivity). In embodiments of this invention in which grain contacts
are identified in optional process 212, the unstructured mesh can be refined (
i.e., more finely patterned) in and near the identified contact regions. Computing device
120 then assigns the material properties of each labeled component of each voxel to
corresponding elements of the unstructured mesh, also in process 214.
[0043] Figure 3E illustrates an example of an unstructured mesh as created in process 214
from a 3D segmented image volume generated in processes 210, 212. The view shown in
Figure 3E is a 2D representation of a 3D unstructured mesh, in which the portions
of the image slice representing solid material 302 are represented by finite elements
that are of differing size and connectivity from one another. Each of these finite
elements are also assigned the material properties corresponding to the labeled component
(
e.g., solid material 302 generally, or the particular material represented) that it overlays.
While Figure 3E illustrates a single 2D slice image 300 and the cross-sections (shown
as triangles) of each finite element in that view, the finite elements of the unstructured
mesh are considered as three-dimensional (tetrahedral) elements that have been applied
to 3D digital image volume 128 composed of a series of such 2D slice images. While
Figure 3E illustrates mesh generation using tetrahedral elements, it is contemplated
that any type of element or combination of different element types may be used to
create an unstructured mesh of solid material 302.
[0044] In process 216, testing system 102 applies a simulated deformation corresponding
to one or more of stress, strain, force, displacement and the like to the unstructured
mesh of 3D image volume 128. In some embodiments of the invention, testing tool 130
is configured to execute one or more software programs 912 including an finite element
(FE) solver to simulate the deformation conditions encountered by rock sample 104
in situ at its sub-surface location in the formation. As known in the art, FE analysis is
used to solve complex problems by dividing the solution domain into smaller subregions
or finite elements. In the context of an unstructured mesh, as mentioned above, a
variety of element shapes and sizes are employed in the same solution domain. Each
element is associated with a number of nodal points at which neighboring elements
are connected to one another, generally with an interpolation function (commonly known
as a shape function) representing the variation of the field variable over the element.
A system of simultaneous algebraic equations for the overall system is typically formulated,
based on physical arguments establishing equilibrium and compatibility at the nodal
points. Boundary conditions are imposed on the edges of the solution domain by assigning
specific nodal values of the dependent variables, or nodal loads/force. This system
of equations is then solved for unknown nodal values such as stress, strain, force,
and displacement. In this case, testing tool 130 is configured to include a FE solver,
realized as the necessary logic, algorithms, etc., capable of performing this FE analysis
in process 216 upon the unstructured mesh defined in process 214. The particular FE
solver can be any type of conventional known FE solver, such as a linear direct solver,
an iterative solver, an eigensolver, a nonlinear equation solver, or another FE solver.
[0045] In embodiments of the invention in which testing tool 130 utilizes finite element
techniques to simulate a deformation applied to a volume of rock represented by digital
image volume 128, process 216 is executed by computing device 120 subjecting the unstructured
mesh of finite elements with labeled material properties to FE analysis to solve a
system of elastic, viscoelastic, or other appropriate constitutive governing equations
in light of boundary conditions that are assigned to the faces of the meshed volume,
in a manner representative of the desired
in situ sub-surface deformation conditions to be simulated. For example, these boundary conditions
may take the form of applied displacements, in which case the FE solver calculates
stress and strain for each finite element of the mesh volume. In other implementations,
tractions (
i.e. stresses) are applied to the unstructured mesh, in which case the FE solver calculates
stress and strain for each finite element of the mesh volume. The magnitude and direction
of the applied deformation preferably correspond to the desired
in situ stress-strain condition, examples of which include hydrostatic, uniaxial, and triaxial
stress-strain. In either case, testing tool 130 executes process 216 by numerically
solving the appropriate governing equations (
i.e., such as those for linear elasticity) across the volume represented by the unstructured
mesh for the applied boundary conditions. From these stress-strain computations for
linear elasticity, the FE solver can also calculate effective elastic properties (Young's
modulus, Poisson's ratio, bulk modulus, and shear modulus, and the like) of the entire
image volume 128. These elastic parameters are usually recovered by solving for the
stiffness matrix, which relates stress to strain, or for the compliance matrix, which
relates strain to stress. The effects of the simulated deformation affect the structure
and attributes of the unstructured mesh. Figure 3F illustrates an example of a simulated
deformation where material stresses have been calculated on the mesh shown in Figure
3E in response to an applied displacement boundary condition. As evident from a comparison
of Figures 3E and 3F, this simulated deformation effects a compression of image volume
300 in the x-direction in this example.
[0046] In Figure 3F, the elastic properties (
E, v) of the solid matrix are assumed to be homogeneous throughout the volume, and are
kept constant during the deformation stage. When clays or other significantly different
elastic materials are present, it is useful to perform the simulations with elastic
properties assigned to each mineral (quartz, clay, etc.). Moreover, when grain contacts
are considered to have a significant impact on the overall mechanical behavior of
the rock, such as with weakly consolidated sands, it is useful to take into account
contact compliance/stiffiiess, which arises due to the presence of grain contacts.
Usually, elastic properties that vary with applied stress/strain are assigned a stress
dependent contact compliance (normal and tangential), using a variety of approaches,
such as analytical models, experimental data, or heuristic functions. Analytical models
for contact behavior (Hertz, Mindlin, Walton, Digby, etc.) usually assume that spherical
grains are in contact and that the contact region is circular. These models can be
applied within a simulation to adjust the elastic properties of the contact regions
for each individual grain, taking into account each grains coordination number, which
refers to the number of grain contacts for that grain. Moreover, as these models are
usually functions of applied stress, the contact elastic properties can be adjusted
as the deformation proceeds, depending upon the incremental stress or strains computed
in the contact regions. As noted above, another approach to assigning elastic properties
to the contact regions is to utilize experimental data, where dynamic elastic properties
(compressional and shear wave velocities) measured as a function of stress are used
to calibrate contact compliance, for example by assuming that the static elastic properties
(Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio) of sample 128 to be equivalent to the dynamic elastic
properties (Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio) extracted from the measured wave velocities.
[0047] In order to take into account contact stiffness/compliance effects in the simulated
deformation, it is necessary to perform optional process 212 in which grain and contact
partitioning is applied to the segmented volume. Figure 4A and 4B illustrate an example
of this grain and contact partitioning. In Figure 4A, the solid matrix material is
shown prior to partitioning process 212. Figure 4B shows the same material following
process 212, with the grain partitions shown by black values and the contacts between
grans identified by light gray values. Figure 4C shows the mesh created in process
214 for the grain-partitioned volume of Figure 4B. In the example of Figure 4C, refinement
of the mesh in the vicinity of the contact regions is shown in Figure 4C by the smaller
triangles, relative to the larger triangle sizes in the interior of the solid grains.
The desired stress/strain conditions are implemented numerically in smaller increments,
with a series of deformations performed, to reach the desired
in situ stress/strain condition. After each incremental deformation, a new grain and contact
partition for the volume is typically created using process 212 on a voxelized representation
of the deformed volume. Mesh refinement within the contact in this fashion is often
useful because of the significant differences in the elastic properties between the
contact regions and grain regions. This incremental mesh refinement approach, in which
processes 212, 214, 216 are repeated, is illustrated in Figure 2 by way of the dashed
line. Alternatively, behavior in the contact region can be characterized by using
suitably small mesh elements for both the interior of the solid grains and the contact
regions, at a cost of increased computational requirements due to the larger number
of elements in the model.
[0048] As discussed above, the elastic properties of the contact regions can be modelled
using analytical models, approximated from experiments, or postulated to behave according
to heuristic functions. In Figure 4G, two different functions are displayed for varying
elastic properties of the contact regions as a function of displacement (expressed
as percentage volume change in this example). The plot using the diamond symbols assumes
that Young's modulus for the contact regions is less than the Young's modulus of the
solid grains, and is constant with increasing deformation. The plot using the cross
symbols assumes that Young's modulus of the contact regions varies non-linearly with
increasing deformation. It is also possible to change the elastic properties of individual
grains with deformation, if it is suspected that the grains contain compliant porosity
below the image resolution. In Figures 4D through 4F, the normal strain is shown in
the volume before deformation (Figure 4D), after one incremental step in deformation
without grain contact behavior (Figure 4E), and with grain contact behavior assumed
to vary according to a non-linear heuristic function (Figure 4F). These Figures 4D
through 4F illustrate clear differences in grain shape and pore space result from
deformation that does include contact behavior, as compared with deformation not including
contact behavior. In particular, more deformation in the volume appears when taking
contact behavior into account, as evident by a reduction in porosity and by the change
in grain shapes. Figure 4F also shows that vastly different strains are induced in
the contact regions relative to those within the grain regions. In particular, Figure
4F shows that, after one increment in deformation, some grains are now in contact
that were not prior to the incremental deformation, requiring grain partitioning process
212 to be repeated before subsequent deformations are performed.
[0049] In Figure 4H, porosity is plotted for three different deformation scenarios. The
first assumption is that the elastic properties are homogeneous throughout the volume,
with no contact behavior (Figure 4E). The second assumption is that the heuristic
function for contact behavior is constant with deformation, and the third assumption
is that the heuristic function for contact behavior is non-linear with deformation
(Figure 4F), both of which are shown in Figure 4G. As shown by these Figures, additional
deformation is evident from the significant reductions in porosity that appear when
taking contact behavior into account using the heuristic functions.
[0050] In process 220, testing tool 130 then performs digital numerical simulation to analyze
one or more physical properties of rock sample 104 under the simulated
in situ deformation conditions applied in process 216. It is contemplated that process 220
may be carried out by numerical analysis of the corresponding rock in the sub-surface
under conditions represented by the final evolved stress state of the rock digital
image volume 128. In the context of oil and gas exploration and production, petrophysical
properties of interest such as porosity, formation factor, absolute and relative permeability,
electrical properties (such as formation factor, cementation exponent, saturation
exponent, tortuosity factor), capillary pressure properties (such as mercury capillary
injection), elastic moduli and properties (such as bulk modulus, shear modulus, Young's
modulus, Poisson's ratio, Lamé constants), and the like, may also be determined in
process 220. These petrophysical properties may be estimated using an appropriate
discretization of the deformed volume combined with appropriate numerical simulation,
e.g. the direct numerical simulation of single phase fluid flow for computation of absolute
permeability. The determination of some of these petrophysical properties in process
220 may also require numerical simulation using finite element methods, finite difference
methods, finite volume methods, Lattice Boltzmann methods or any variety of other
numerical approaches. As will be discussed in further detail below, relationships
of different petrophysical properties of the material represented by image volume
128 with porosity, or relationships of other pairs of those properties, may also be
estimated in process 220.
[0051] In the process described above with reference to Figure 2, testing system 102 has
simulated the application of a deformation representing one subsurface condition.
It is contemplated that testing system 102 may repeat this process for multiple simulated
deformation conditions, including deformations of different amplitudes, directions,
or types, in order to determine the petrophysical properties under different subsurface
conditions, as well as to derive functions expressing the relationships of those properties
to varying deformations. For example, Figure 6 presents a graph of the calculated
porosity for a given rock sample 104 under different simulated deformation conditions,
in this example by plotting porosity as a function of displacement in the x-direction
(
i.e., compression, expressed as percentage volume change).
[0052] Referring now to Figures 5A through 5D, various detailed processes 220a through 220d
by way of which process 220 may be carried out to determine physical properties of
the rock formation from which rock sample 104 was acquired, under simulated conditions
corresponding to the
in situ deformation encountered in the sub-surface, will now be described. These approaches
to determining physical properties are not mutually exclusive of one another, and
as such one or more of these processes may be used in any given instance of process
220, depending on the particular properties to be characterized.
[0053] Figure 5A illustrates, in detail, process 220a by way of which porosity and other
petrophysical properties of the sampled rock formation under the simulated deformation
condition may be determined according to an embodiment of the invention. In process
410, testing tool 130 extracts the deformed volumetric mesh of the solid material
of digital image volume 128 as produced by process 216, with the deformation resulting
from the application of the simulated deformation conditions emulating the sub-surface
environment, as described above. In process 412, testing tool 130 analyzes the full
volume containing the deformed volumetric mesh to calculate the ratio of the volume
of the solid phase to the total volume fraction (
i.e., containing the solid material and deformed pore space). This ratio gives the volume
fraction of the solid material, which can be utilized to determine the volume fraction
of the pore space (known as porosity) through the simple relationship that the two
fractions together add to unity. As illustrated in the example of Figure 6, porosity
decreases with increasing displacement due to the applied deformation. As such, it
is contemplated that the porosity calculated in process 412 will be a good estimate
of the porosity of the corresponding sub-surface rock formation from which rock sample
104 originated, as compared with porosity estimates based on analysis of images from
rock samples at ambient surface conditions.
[0054] It is known in the art that certain petrophysical properties correlate to porosity.
Examples of such porosity-correlated properties include permeability, formation factor.
In process 414, testing tool 130 estimates one or more of these correlated properties
from the porosity calculated in process 412, using rules of thumb that are established
or otherwise known in the industry, or using correlations developed from laboratory
experiments. The porosity value and any such correlated petrophysical properties are
then stored in a memory resource of computing device 120 or a networked memory resource,
as desired, for use in further analysis of the reservoir in the conventional manner.
[0055] Figure 5B illustrates process 220b, according to which testing tool 130 in testing
system 102 calculates certain petrophysical properties according to another embodiment
of the invention. Process 220b begins with process 410, which as described above extracts
the deformed volumetric mesh of the solid phase constituents of digital image volume
128 as produced by process 218, with the deformation resulting from the application
of the simulated deformation conditions emulating the sub-surface environment, as
described above.
[0056] In process 420, testing tool 130 operates to convert the deformed mesh geometry from
process 410 into a voxelized geometry that is consistent with the input requirements
of geometries used in a particular numerical analysis technique for determining the
desired petrophysical properties. For example, the conversion of process 420 may voxelize
the deformed unstructured mesh geometry into a structured grid or mesh form that is
suitable for application to such algorithms as finite difference algorithms, Lattice
Boltzmann algorithms, or both.
[0057] For example, computing device 120 may perform process 420 by converting the unstructured
deformed mesh representing the solid material into a structured mesh representing
the pore phase. Computing device 120 can then, also in conversion process 420, overlay
a structured mesh onto the unstructured deformed mesh and extrapolate a point that
exists at the center of each structured mesh block, followed by using a point detection
algorithm to determine whether the center of each structured mesh block is inside
or outside of the unstructured domain. Following this point detection, computing device
120 then determines whether a mesh block on the structured mesh should be identified
as residing in the pore space or in the solid phase. Figure 7 illustrates the result
of this algorithm for one case of a deformed mesh, where the resolution of the overlaying
structured grid dictates how well the structured grid represents the unstructured
grid at different resolutions of the voxelization.
[0058] Following conversion process 420, testing tool 130 applies the desired numerical
algorithm to compute the petrophysical properties, in process 422. For example, following
the conversion into structured grids in process 420, computing device 120 (executing
testing tool 130) may utilize existing Lattice-Boltzmann (LB) models to simulate single
phase fluid flow in the pore space, from which properties such as permeability can
be readily recovered. Figure 8 illustrates the results of Lattice-Boltzmann simulation
analysis for a set of geometries deformed by varying simulated deformation conditions,
as resulting from linear elasticity computations in each of the primary flow directions
(
x, y, z). These results summarized in Figure 8 support the expectation that permeability
should decrease with the decreasing porosity resulting from uniaxial strain.
[0059] Alternatively or in addition, process 422 may be used to calculate electrical properties
using a structured mesh representing the deformed rock sample as generated in process
420. For example, a finite difference algorithm executed by computing device 120 can
solve the Laplace equation for voltage distribution within the porous sample, from
which the conductivity of the porous material can be recovered. Based on this conductivity
analysis, computing device 120 can calculate such electrical properties as formation
factor (FF) and resistivity index (RI), each of which is useful in the oil and gas
exploration and production context. In the case of formation factor, the pore space
is assumed to be entirely saturated with water, while in the case of resistivity index,
oil and water are assumed to be distributed within the pore space. Figures 9 and 10
depict the dependence of FF and RI, respectively, with varying porosity at varying
simulated deformation conditions. In these examples, a water wet scenario was considered
where the distribution of oil and water at varying water saturation (S
w) was based on a maximum inscribed sphere of the pore space. As illustrated, both
FF and RI increase with decreasing porosity. In Figure 9, FF is calculated for all
deformed geometries in each of the primary directions, while in Figure 10, RI is shown
only in the x-direction for the case of 5% total volume compression.
[0060] These electrical and other petrophysical properties as obtained from process 220b
are then stored in a memory resource of computing device 120 or a networked memory
resource, as desired, for use in further analysis of the reservoir in the conventional
manner.
[0061] Figure 5C illustrates process 220c, according to which testing tool 130 in testing
system 102 calculates certain petrophysical properties according to another embodiment
of the invention. As in the case of processes 220a, 220b, process 220c similarly begins
with process 410, which as described above extracts the deformed volumetric mesh of
the solid phase constituents of digital image volume 128 as produced by process 218,
with the deformation resulting from the application of the simulated deformation conditions
emulating the sub-surface environment, as described above.
[0062] In process 430 of process 220c, testing tool 130 identifies those elements of the
deformed unstructured mesh that correspond to surface elements of the pore space,
i.e. the pore "wall". The result of process 430 is a representation of the outer surfaces
of the pore space of the portion of rock sample 104 represented by digital image volume
128, desirably in a form compatible with a conventional volume "meshing" software
package. In process 432, testing tool 130 utilizes such a volume meshing package to
construct or otherwise define a volumetric mesh of the pore space defined by the pore
wall surface elements identified in process 430, desirably in a format suitable for
analysis by an appropriate finite element analysis tool or other numerical tool, such
as Lattice-Boltzmann. The volumetric mesh of the pore space generated in process 432
may be a structured mesh (
i.e., a regular pattern of polygonal elements) or an unstructured mesh (
i.e., an irregular pattern of polygonal elements with irregular connectivity), as desired.
[0063] Once the volumetric mesh of the pore space is generated in process 432, testing tool
130 then executes a finite element solver or other numerical algorithm in process
434 to compute the desired petrophysical properties based on that volumetric mesh
of the pore space. One example of process 434 that may be carried out by computing
device 120 and testing tool 130 is a computation of absolute permeability of rock
sample 104 by modeling single phase fluid flow using a finite element solution of
the Navier-Stokes equations, under boundary conditions that impose a pressure drop
across the modeled volume. Other properties may also or alternatively be computed
in process 434, using finite element solutions, or using other techniques such as
finite difference, finite volume, Lattice-Boltzmann, network modeling, and the like
to compute those properties as well as absolute permeability.
[0064] The petrophysical or other properties obtained from process 220c are then stored
in a memory resource of computing device 120 or a networked memory resource, as desired,
for use in further analysis of the reservoir in the conventional manner.
[0065] Figure 5D illustrates process 220d, according to which testing tool 130 in testing
system 102 calculates certain petrophysical or material properties using analytical
models, according to another embodiment of the invention. Examples of properties that
are contemplated to be recoverable by way of process 220d include those properties
that are determined by or related to pore topology within the rock. As in the case
of processes 220a through 220c described above, process 220d similarly begins with
process 410, which as described above extracts the deformed volumetric mesh of the
solid phase constituents of digital image volume 128 as produced by process 218, with
the deformation resulting from the application of the simulated deformation conditions
emulating the sub-surface environment, as described above.
[0066] In process 440, geometrical properties are extracted by testing tool 130 from the
deformed volumetric mesh identified in process 410. Examples of these geometrical
properties include measures such as surface-to-volume ratio of the grains or pores,
the critical pore throat diameter recoverable from topological measures extracted
from a deformed volumetric mesh of the pore space, as well as other structural parameters
or model parameters identifiable from the deformed mesh. The particular format or
data representing these geometrical properties extracted in process 440 should be
compatible with one or more analytical models to be applied, in process 442, to determine
or calculate the desired material property. In this process 442, testing tool 130
executes one or more particular analytical models capable of estimating the desired
petrophysical property of interest from the extracted geometrical properties for the
solid. Examples of these properties include flow properties and electrical properties,
among others.
[0067] An example of a material and petrophysical property that may be determined by application
of process 220d is the "tortuosity" of the material. As known in the art, the tortuosity
of a porous material reflects the extent to which fluid paths through the material
are twisted, or involve turns. For example, a material having a high number of closely-spaced
sharp turns in its fluid paths of its pore space will exhibit a higher tortuosity
than will a porous material in which the fluid paths are relatively straight. For
the example of tortuosity, testing tool 130 may execute process 440 by representing
the pore space by a population of maximum-sized inscribed spheres that fit within
that pore space. A "streamline" is then defined in this process 440 by connecting
the centroids of those inscribed spheres along each fluid path. Process 442 can then
calculate tortuosity of the material by applying a measure such as the "arc-chord"
ratio of the length of the curve represented by the centroid-to-centroid streamline
to the distance between its ends (
i.e., as the "crow flies").
[0068] Other tortuosity calculations known in the art may alternatively or additionally
be applied by testing tool in process 442. For example, "rule of thumb" relationships
may be used to determine properties such as absolute permeability according to the
functional relationship of permeability to critical pore throat radius parameters
extracted in process 440. Additionally, following the computation of one or more petrophysical
properties in this manner, testing tool 130 may compute other properties of the material
in process 442 based on those results. In any case, the petrophysical or other properties
obtained from process 220d can then be stored in a memory resource of computing device
120 or a networked memory resource, as desired, for use in further analysis of the
reservoir in the conventional manner.
[0069] As mentioned above, the particular detailed techniques 220a through 220d for performing
process 220 in the overall method of Figure 2 may be applied individually, or in some
combination.
[0070] As will also be evident to the skilled reader of this specification, these embodiments
provide important benefits in the analysis of porous materials, such as samples of
sub-surface formations at or near potential reservoirs of oil and gas. In particular,
embodiments of this invention enable the use of direct numerical simulation techniques
to analyze material properties, including petrophysical properties, of sub-surface
formations under the deformation conditions applied to those formations in their sub-surface
environment. This improves the ability of laboratory systems and analytical equipment
to accurately characterize the sub-surface, over conventional direct numerical simulation
techniques applied to image volumes acquired at surface ambient conditions. Furthermore,
by simulating the
in situ subsurface conditions of a rock sample using an image volume and additional numerical
analysis according to embodiments of the invention, the time and cost for determining
petrophysical properties can be reduced. Relative to laboratory measurements, which
may take months to complete, the turnaround time for image based computation of stress/strain
related petrophysical properties, can be reduced to days or less. Furthermore, by
using a simulation approach to obtain estimates of subsurface properties under stress,
it is possible to obtain many different evolved stress states from the one image of
a rock volume, such an ensemble assisting an understanding the evolution of subsurface
petrophysical properties during the development and production of reservoir rock.
These and other advantages and benefits are contemplated to be made available by embodiments
of the invention, as may be applicable to particular materials, situations, and implementations.
1. A computer implemented method of analyzing a rock sample, comprising the steps of:
segmenting a digital image volume corresponding to one or more tomographic images
of a rock sample (210), to associate voxels in the digital image volume with pore
space or solid material (212);
overlaying voxels corresponding to solid material in the segmented digital image volume
with an unstructured finite element mesh (214);
numerically simulating the application of a deformation to the unstructured mesh to
produce a deformed volumetric mesh of the digital image volume under the simulated
deformation (216); and
then numerically analyzing a representation of the digital image volume corresponding
to the deformed volumetric mesh to characterize a material property of the rock sample
under conditions corresponding to the deformation (220).
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
repeating the overlaying, simulating, and analyzing steps to characterize the material
property over multiple deformation conditions.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the deformation corresponds to one or more of a stress
condition, a strain condition, a force condition, and a displacement condition.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
after the segmenting step, assigning values for elastic properties to voxels associated
with solid material;
wherein the numerically simulating step is performed using the assigned values for
elastic properties.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
partitioning individual grains of solid material represented in the segmented digital
image volume and identifying contact regions of those grains.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the step of overlaying voxels with an unstructured
finite element mesh overlays the contact regions with a finer pattern of finite elements
than the finite elements applied to other portions of the partitioned grains; preferably
wherein the method
further comprises:
after the partitioning step, assigning values for elastic properties to voxels associated
with solid material;
wherein the values for elastic properties include values corresponding to contact
compliance assigned to the identified contact regions; and
wherein the numerically simulating step is performed using the assigned values for
elastic properties; and optionally wherein after a first instance of the numerically
simulating step, repeating the partitioning, overlaying, and numerically simulating
steps.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the numerically simulating step comprises:
defining boundary conditions corresponding to the deformation to be applied to a system
of equations corresponding to constitutive equations of elasticity across the volume
of solid material represented by the unstructured mesh; and
executing a finite element solver to solve the system of equations for the defined
boundary conditions for displacement of nodes of the unstructured mesh.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the numerically analyzing step comprises:
extracting a deformed volumetric mesh of the solid phase portion of the digital image
volume;
calculating porosity of a volume corresponding to the deformed volumetric mesh; and
estimating one or more petrophysical properties according to a correlation of the
petrophysical property to porosity.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the numerically analyzing step comprises:
extracting a deformed volumetric mesh of the solid phase portion of the digital image
volume;
converting the deformed volumetric mesh into a voxelized geometry representing a deformed
volume representing pore space and solid material; and
numerically computing one or more petrophysical properties from the deformed volumetric
mesh;
preferably wherein: (i) the converting step converts the deformed volumetric mesh
into a voxelized geometry representing pore space in the volume;
and wherein the numerically computing step comprises:
simulating fluid flow in the pore space using a Lattice-Boltzmann model to determine
permeability of the rock sample under the deformation;
or (ii) the numerically computing step comprises:
solving a Laplace equation for voltage distribution within the volume, at an assumed
water saturation level, to calculate either or both of a formation factor and resistivity
index of the rock sample under the deformation.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the numerically analyzing step comprises:
extracting a deformed volumetric mesh of the solid phase portion of the digital image
volume;
identifying pore wall surface elements in the deformed volumetric mesh;
generating a volumetric mesh of pore space based on the identified pore wall surface
elements; and
executing a numerical method to solve a system of equations applied to the volumetric
mesh of the pore space to determine one or more petrophysical properties of the rock
sample.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the numerically analyzing step comprises:
extracting a deformed volumetric mesh of the solid phase portion of the digital image
volume;
extracting geometrical properties from the deformed volumetric mesh;
applying the extracted geometrical properties to an analytical model to compute one
or more petrophysical properties of the rock sample;
preferably wherein the geometrical properties include a plurality of largest inscribed
spheres fitting within the pore space represented by the deformed volumetric mesh;
and wherein the applying step comprises:
identifying one or more streamlines corresponding to line segments connecting centroids
of the pore space; and
calculating tortuosity of the rock sample from the identified streamlines.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the numerically analyzing step characterizes one or
more material properties corresponding to one or more of a group of petrophysical
properties consisting of absolute permeability, relative permeability, porosity, formation
factor, cementation exponent, saturation exponent, tortuosity factor, bulk modulus,
shear modulus, Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, Lame constants, and capillary pressure
properties.
13. A system for analyzing material samples, the system comprising:
an imaging device (122), such as a device comprising an X-ray computed tomography
scanner, configured to produce a digital image volume representative of a material
sample; and
a computing device (120) coupled to the imaging device and comprising: one or more
processors; and
one or more memory devices (904), coupled to the one or more processors (902), storing
program instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the
one or more processors to characterize, from a sample of a material, one or more material
properties by performing a plurality of operations comprising:
segmenting (210) a digital image volume corresponding to one or more tomographic images
of a rock sample, to associate voxels in the digital image volume with pore space
or solid material (212);
overlaying voxels corresponding to solid material in the segmented digital image volume
with an unstructured finite element mesh (214);
numerically simulating the application of a deformation to the unstructured mesh to
produce a deformed volumetric mesh of the digital image volume under the simulated
deformation (216); and
then numerically analyzing a representation of the digital image volume corresponding
to the deformed volumetric mesh to characterize a material property of the rock sample
under conditions corresponding to the deformation (220).
14. The system of claim 13, wherein the plurality of operations further comprises the
steps as defined in claim 2 or any one of claims 4 to 6.
15. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing program instructions that,
when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to characterize,
from a sample of a material, one or more material properties by performing a plurality
of operations comprising:
segmenting (210) a digital image volume corresponding to one or more tomographic images
of a rock sample, to associate voxels in the digital image volume with pore space
or solid material (212);
overlaying voxels corresponding to solid material in the segmented digital image volume
with an unstructured finite element mesh (214);
numerically simulating the application of a deformation to the unstructured mesh to
produce a deformed volumetric mesh of the digital image volume under the simulated
deformation (216); and
then numerically analyzing a representation of the digital image volume corresponding
to the deformed volumetric mesh to characterize a material property of the rock sample
under conditions corresponding to the deformation (220).
16. The medium of claim 15, wherein the plurality of operations further comprises the
steps as defined in claim 2 or any one of claims 4 to 6.
1. Computerimplementiertes Verfahren zur Analyse einer Gesteinsprobe, umfassend die Schritte:
Segmentieren eines Digitalbildvolumens, das einem oder mehreren tomographischen Bildern
einer Gesteinsprobe entspricht (210), um Voxel in dem Digitalbildvolumen mit Porenraum
oder festem Material (212) zu assoziieren;
Überlagern von Voxeln, die festem Material entsprechen, in dem segmentierten Digitalbildvolumen
mit einem unstrukturierten Finite-Elemente-Gitter (214);
numerisches Simulieren der Anwendung einer Verformung auf das unstrukturierte Gitter,
um ein verformtes volumetrisches Gitter des Digitalbildvolumens unter der simulierten
Verformung zu produzieren (216); und
dann numerisches Analysieren einer Darstellung des Digitalbildvolumens, das dem verformten
volumetrischen Gitter entspricht, um eine Materialeigenschaft der Gesteinsprobe unter
Bedingungen, die der Verformung entsprechen (220), zu charakterisieren.
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, weiterhin umfassend:
Wiederholen des Überlagerungs-, des Simulations- und des Analyseschritts, um die Materialeigenschaft
über mehrere Verformungsbedingungen zu charakterisieren.
3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Verformung einer oder mehreren von einer Spannungsbedingung,
einer Dehnungsbedingung, einer Kraftbedingung und einer Verschiebungsbedingung entspricht.
4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, weiterhin umfassend:
nach dem Segmentierungsschritt Zuweisen von Werten für elastische Eigenschaften an
Voxel, die mit festem Material assoziiert sind;
wobei der numerische Simulationsschritt unter Verwendung der zugewiesenen Werte für
elastische Eigenschaften durchgeführt wird.
5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, weiterhin umfassend:
Partitionieren einzelner Körner von festem Material, das in dem segmentierten Digitalbildvolumen
dargestellt ist, und Identifizieren von Kontaktregionen jener Körner.
6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 5, wobei der Schritt des Überlagerns von Voxeln mit einem
unstrukturierten Finite-Elemente-Gitter die Kontaktregionen mit einem feineren Muster
von Finite-Elementen als die Finite-Elemente, die auf andere Teile der partitionierten
Körner angewendet werden, überlagert; vorzugsweise wobei das Verfahren weiterhin umfasst:
nach dem Partitionierungsschritt Zuweisen von Werten für elastische Eigenschaften
an Voxel, die mit festem Material assoziiert sind;
wobei die Werte für elastische Eigenschaften Werte beinhalten, die einer Kontaktkonformität
entsprechen, die den identifizierten Kontaktregionen zugewiesen ist; und
wobei der numerische Simulationsschritt unter Verwendung der zugewiesenen Werte für
elastische Eigenschaften durchgeführt wird; und optional wobei nach einer ersten Instanz
des numerischen Simulationsschritts der Partitionierungs-, der Überlagerungs- und
der numerische Simulationsschritt wiederholt werden.
7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der numerische Simulationsschritt umfasst:
Definieren von Grenzbedingungen, die der Verformung entsprechen, die auf ein System
von Gleichungen angewendet werden soll, die Zustandsgleichungen einer Elastizität
über das Volumen von festem Material, das von dem unstrukturierten Gitter dargestellt
wird, entsprechen; und
Ausführen eines Finite-Elemente-Lösers, um das System von Gleichungen für die definierten
Grenzbedingungen zur Verlagerung von Knoten des unstrukturierten Gitters zu lösen.
8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der numerische Analyseschritt umfasst:
Extrahieren eines verformten volumetrischen Gitters der Festphasenteils des Digitalbildvolumens;
Berechnen einer Porosität eines Volumens, das dem verformten volumetrischen Gitter
entspricht; und
Einschätzen einer oder mehrerer petrophysikalischer Eigenschaften gemäß einer Korrelation
der petrophysikalischen Eigenschaft mit der Porosität.
9. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der numerische Analyseschritt umfasst:
Extrahieren eines verformten volumetrischen Gitters der Festphasenteils des Digitalbildvolumens;
Umwandeln des verformten volumetrischen Gitters in eine voxelisierte Geometrie, die
einem verformten Volumen entspricht, das Porenraum und festes Material darstellt;
und
numerisches Errechnen einer oder mehrerer petrophysikalischer Eigenschaften aus dem
verformten volumetrischen Gitter;
vorzugsweise wobei: (i) der Umwandlungsschritt das verformte volumetrische Gitter
in eine voxelisierte Geometrie umwandelt, die Porenraum in dem Volumen darstellt;
und wobei der numerische Errechnungsschritt umfasst:
Simulieren eines Fluidstroms in den Porenraum unter Verwendung eines Lattice-Boltzmann-Modells,
um eine Permeabilität der Gesteinsprobe unter der Verformung zu bestimmen;
oder (ii) der numerische Errechnungsschritt umfasst:
Lösen einer Laplace-Gleichung zur Spannungsverteilung innerhalb des Volumens bei einem
angenommenen Wassersättigungsniveau, um einen oder beide von einem Formationsfaktor
und einem spezifischen Widerstandsindex der Gesteinsprobe unter der Verformung zu
berechnen.
10. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der numerische Analyseschritt umfasst:
Extrahieren eines verformten volumetrischen Gitters der Festphasenteils des Digitalbildvolumens;
Identifizieren von Porenwandoberflächenelementen in dem verformten volumetrischen
Gitter;
Erzeugen eines volumetrischen Gitters von Porenraum auf der Basis der identifizierten
Porenwandoberflächenelemente und
Ausführen eines numerischen Verfahrens zum Lösen eines Systems von Gleichungen, das
auf das volumetrische Gitter des Porenraums angewendet wird, um eine oder mehrere
petrophysikalische Eigenschaften der Gesteinsprobe zu bestimmen.
11. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der numerische Analyseschritt umfasst:
Extrahieren eines verformten volumetrischen Gitters der Festphasenteils des Digitalbildvolumens;
Extrahieren von geometrischen Eigenschaften aus dem verformten volumetrischen Gitter;
Anwenden der extrahierten geometrischen Eigenschaften auf ein analytisches Modell,
um eine oder mehrere petrophysikalische Eigenschaften der Gesteinsprobe zu errechnen;
vorzugsweise wobei die geometrischen Eigenschaften eine Vielzahl von größten eingeschriebenen
Sphären beinhalten, die in den Porenraum passen, der von dem verformten volumetrischen
Gitter dargestellt wird;
und wobei der Anwendungsschritt umfasst:
Identifizieren einer oder mehrerer Stromlinien, die Liniensegmenten entsprechen, die
Schwerpunkte des Porenraums verbinden; und
Berechnen einer Gewundenheit der Gesteinsprobe aus den identifizierten Stromlinien.
12. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der numerische Analyseschritt eine oder mehrere Materialeigenschaften
charakterisiert, die einer oder mehreren von einer Gruppe von petrophysikalischen
Eigenschaften entsprechen, bestehend aus absoluter Permeabilität, relativer Permeabilität,
Porosität, Formationsfaktor, Zementationsexponent, Sättigungsexponent, Gewundenheitsfaktor,
Kompressionsmodul, Schermodul, Youngschem Modul, Poisson-Zahl, Lame-Konstanten und
Kapillardruckeigenschaften.
13. System zur Analyse von Materialproben, wobei das System umfasst:
eine Abbildungsvorrichtung (122), wie eine Vorrichtung, die einen Röntgencomputertomographie-Scanner
umfasst, die dazu konfiguriert ist, ein Digitalbildvolumen zu produzieren, das eine
Materialprobe darstellt; und
eine Rechenvorrichtung (120), die an die Abbildungsvorrichtung gekoppelt ist und umfasst:
einen oder mehrere Prozessoren und
eine oder mehrere Speichervorrichtungen (904), die an den einen oder die mehreren
Prozessoren (902) gekoppelt sind und die Programmanweisungen speichern, die bei Ausführung
durch den einen oder die mehreren Prozessoren bewirken, dass der eine oder die mehreren
Prozessoren eine oder mehrere Materialeigenschaften von einer Probe eines Materials
durch Durchführen einer Vielzahl von Operationen charakterisieren, umfassend:
Segmentieren (210) eines Digitalbildvolumens, das einem oder mehreren tomographischen
Bildern einer Gesteinsprobe entspricht, um Voxel in dem Digitalbildvolumen mit Porenraum
oder festem Material zu assoziieren (212);
Überlagern von Voxeln, die festem Material entsprechen, in dem segmentierten Digitalbildvolumen
mit einem unstrukturierten Finite-Elemente-Gitter (214);
numerisches Simulieren der Anwendung einer Verformung auf das unstrukturierte Gitter,
um ein verformtes volumetrisches Gitter des Digitalbildvolumens unter der simulierten
Verformung zu produzieren (216); und
dann numerisches Analysieren einer Darstellung des Digitalbildvolumens, das dem verformten
volumetrischen Gitter entspricht, um eine Materialeigenschaft der Gesteinsprobe unter
Bedingungen, die der Verformung entsprechen (220), zu charakterisieren.
14. System nach Anspruch 13, wobei die Vielzahl von Operationen weiterhin die wie in Anspruch
2 oder einem der Ansprüche 4 bis 6 definierten Schritte umfasst.
15. Nichtflüchtiges computerlesbares Speichermedium, das Programmanweisungen speichern,
die bei Ausführung durch einen oder mehrere Prozessoren bewirken, dass der eine oder
die mehreren Prozessoren eine oder mehrere Materialeigenschaften von einer Probe eines
Materials durch Durchführen einer Vielzahl von Operationen charakterisieren, umfassend:
Segmentieren (210) eines Digitalbildvolumens, das einem oder mehreren tomographischen
Bildern einer Gesteinsprobe entspricht, um Voxel in dem Digitalbildvolumen mit Porenraum
oder festem Material zu assoziieren (212);
Überlagern von Voxeln, die festem Material entsprechen, in dem segmentierten Digitalbildvolumen
mit einem unstrukturierten Finite-Elemente-Gitter (214);
numerisches Simulieren der Anwendung einer Verformung auf das unstrukturierte Gitter,
um ein verformtes volumetrisches Gitter des Digitalbildvolumens unter der simulierten
Verformung zu produzieren (216); und
dann numerisches Analysieren einer Darstellung des Digitalbildvolumens, das dem verformten
volumetrischen Gitter entspricht, um eine Materialeigenschaft der Gesteinsprobe unter
Bedingungen, die der Verformung entsprechen (220), zu charakterisieren.
16. Medium nach Anspruch 15, wobei die Vielzahl von Operationen weiterhin die wie in Anspruch
2 oder einem der Ansprüche 4 bis 6 definierten Schritte umfasst.
1. Procédé mis en œuvre par ordinateur d'analyse d'un échantillon de roche, comprenant
les étapes suivantes :
la segmentation d'un volume d'image numérique correspondant à une ou plusieurs images
tomographiques d'un échantillon de roche (210), pour associer des voxels dans le volume
d'image numérique à un espace poral ou un matériau solide (212) ;
la superposition de voxels correspondant à un matériau solide dans le volume d'image
numérique segmenté avec un maillage d'éléments finis non structuré (214) ;
la simulation numérique de l'application d'une déformation au maillage non structuré
pour produire un maillage volumétrique déformé du volume d'image numérique sous la
déformation simulée (216) ; et
puis l'analyse numérique d'une représentation du volume d'image numérique correspondant
au maillage volumétrique déformé pour caractériser une propriété matérielle de l'échantillon
de roche dans des conditions correspondant à la déformation (220).
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, comprenant en outre :
la répétition des étapes de superposition, de simulation, et d'analyse pour caractériser
la propriété matérielle pour plusieurs conditions de déformation.
3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la déformation correspond à une ou plusieurs
conditions parmi une condition de contrainte, une condition de déformation, une condition
de force, et une condition de déplacement.
4. Procédé selon la revendication 1, comprenant en outre :
après l'étape de segmentation, l'attribution de valeurs pour des propriétés d'élasticité
à des voxels associés à un matériau solide ;
dans lequel l'étape de simulation numérique est formée en utilisant les valeurs attribuées
pour des propriétés d'élasticité.
5. Procédé selon la revendication 1, comprenant en outre :
la séparation de grains individuels de matériau solide représentés dans le volume
d'image numérique segmenté et l'identification de régions de contact de ces grains.
6. Procédé selon la revendication 5, dans lequel l'étape de superposition de voxels avec
un maillage d'éléments finis non structuré superpose les régions de contact avec un
motif plus fin d'éléments finis que les éléments finis appliqués à d'autres parties
des grains séparés ; de préférence dans lequel le procédé comprend en outre :
après l'étape de séparation, l'attribution de valeurs pour des propriétés d'élasticité
à des voxels associés à un matériau solide ;
dans lequel les valeurs pour des propriétés d'élasticité incluent des valeurs correspondant
à une conformité au contact attribuées aux régions de contact identifiées ; et
dans lequel l'étape de simulation numérique est réalisée en utilisant les valeurs
attribuées pour des propriétés d'élasticité ; et facultativement dans lequel après
une première réalisation de l'étape de simulation numérique, la répétition des étapes
de séparation, de superposition et de simulation numérique.
7. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape de simulation numérique comprend
:
la définition de conditions aux limites correspondant à la déformation devant être
appliquée à un système d'équations correspondant à des équations constitutives d'élasticité
à travers le volume de matériau solide représenté par le maillage non structuré ;
et
l'exécution d'un solveur par éléments finis pour résoudre le système d'équations pour
les conditions aux limites définies pour le déplacement de noeuds du maillage non
structuré.
8. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape d'analyse numérique comprend
:
l'extraction d'un maillage volumétrique déformé de la partie de phase solide du volume
d'image numérique ;
le calcul de la porosité d'un volume correspondant au maillage volumétrique déformé
; et
l'estimation d'une ou de plusieurs propriétés pétrophysiques selon une corrélation
de la propriété pétrophysique avec la porosité.
9. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape d'analyse numérique comprend
:
l'extraction d'un maillage volumétrique déformé de la partie de phase solide du volume
d'image numérique ;
la conversion du maillage volumétrique déformé en une géométrie voxélisée représentant
un volume déformé représentant un espace poral et un matériau solide ; et
le calcul numérique d'une ou de plusieurs propriétés pétrochimiques à partir du maillage
volumétrique déformé ;
de préférence dans lequel : (i) l'étape de conversion convertit le maillage volumétrique
déformé en une géométrie voxélisée représentant l'espace poral dans le volume ;
et dans lequel l'étape de calcul numérique comprend :
la simulation d'un écoulement de fluide dans l'espace poral en utilisant un modèle
de Boltzman sur réseau pour déterminer la perméabilité de l'échantillon de roche sous
la déformation ;
ou (ii) l'étape de calcul numérique comprend :
la résolution d'une équation de Laplace pour la distribution de tension au sein du
volume, à un niveau de saturation en eau supposé, pour calculer un facteur de formation
ou un indice de résistivité, ou les deux, sous la déformation.
10. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape d'analyse numérique comprend
:
l'extraction d'un maillage volumétrique déformé de la partie de phase solide du volume
d'image numérique ;
l'identification d'éléments de surface de paroi de pore dans le maillage volumétrique
déformé ;
la génération d'un maillage volumétrique d'espace poral sur la base des éléments de
surface de paroi de pore identifiés ; et
l'exécution d'un procédé numérique pour résoudre un système d'équations appliqué au
maillage volumétrique de l'espace poral pour déterminer une ou plusieurs propriétés
pétrophysiques de l'échantillon de roche.
11. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape d'analyse numérique comprend
:
l'extraction d'un maillage volumétrique déformé de la partie de phase solide du volume
d'image numérique ;
l'extraction de propriétés géométriques à partir du maillage volumétrique déformé
;
l'application des propriétés géométriques extraites à un modèle analytique pour calculer
une ou plusieurs propriétés pétrophysiques de l'échantillon de roche ;
de préférence dans lequel les propriétés géométriques incluent une pluralité des plus
grandes sphères inscrites ajustées au sein de l'espace poral représenté par le maillage
volumétrique déformé ;
et dans lequel l'étape d'application comprend :
l'identification d'une ou de plusieurs lignes de courant correspondant à des segments
de ligne connectant des centroïdes de l'espace poral ; et
le calcul de la tortuosité de l'échantillon de roche à partir des lignes de courant
identifiées.
12. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape d'analyse numérique caractérise
une ou plusieurs propriétés matérielles correspondant à une ou plusieurs propriétés
choisies parmi un groupe de propriétés pétrophysiques comprenant la perméabilité absolue,
la perméabilité relative, la porosité, le facteur de formation, l'exposant de cimentation,
l'exposant de saturation, le facteur de tortuosité, le module d'incompressibilité,
le module de cisaillement, le module de Young, le coefficient de Poisson, les constantes
de Lamé, et les propriétés de pression capillaires.
13. Système destiné à analyser l'échantillon de matériau, le système comprenant :
un dispositif d'imagerie (122), tel qu'un dispositif comprenant un scanner de tomographie
assisté par ordinateur à rayons X, configuré pour produire un volume d'image numérique
représentatif d'un échantillon de matériau ; et
un dispositif de calcul (120) couplé au dispositif d'imagerie et comprenant :
un ou plusieurs processeurs ; et
un ou plusieurs dispositifs de mémoire (904), couplés aux un ou plusieurs processeurs
(902) stockant des instructions de programme qui, quand elles sont exécutées par les
un ou plusieurs processeurs, amènent les uns ou plusieurs processeurs à caractériser,
à partir d'un échantillon d'un matériau, une ou plusieurs propriétés matérielles en
réalisant une pluralité d'opérations comprenant :
la segmentation (210) d'un volume d'image numérique correspondant à une ou plusieurs
images tomographiques d'un échantillon de roche, pour associer des voxels dans le
volume d'image numérique à un espace poral ou un matériau solide (212) ;
la superposition de voxels correspondant à un matériau solide dans le volume d'image
numérique segmenté avec un maillage d'éléments finis non structuré (214) ;
la simulation numérique de l'application d'une déformation au maillage non structuré
pour produire un maillage volumétrique déformé du volume d'image numérique sous la
déformation simulée (216) ; et
puis l'analyse numérique d'une représentation du volume d'image numérique correspondant
au maillage volumétrique déformé pour caractériser une propriété matérielle de l'échantillon
de roche dans des conditions correspondant à la déformation (220).
14. Système selon la revendication 13, dans lequel la pluralité d'opérations comprend
en outre les étapes telles que définies dans la revendication 2 ou l'une quelconque
des revendications 4 à 6.
15. Support de stockage lisible par ordinateur non transitoire stockant des instructions
de programme qui, quand elles sont exécutées par un ou plusieurs processeurs, amènent
les uns ou plusieurs processeurs à caractériser, à partir d'un échantillon d'un matériau,
une ou plusieurs propriétés matérielles en réalisant une pluralité d'opérations comprenant
:
la segmentation (210) d'un volume d'image numérique correspondant à une ou plusieurs
images tomographiques d'un échantillon de roche, pour associer des voxels dans le
volume d'image numérique à un espace poral ou un matériau solide (212) ;
la superposition de voxels correspondant à un matériau solide dans le volume d'image
numérique segmenté avec un maillage d'éléments finis non structuré (214) ;
la simulation numérique de l'application d'une déformation au maillage non structuré
pour produire un maillage volumétrique déformé du volume d'image numérique sous la
déformation simulée (216) ; et
puis l'analyse numérique d'une représentation du volume d'image numérique correspondant
au maillage volumétrique déformé pour caractériser une propriété matérielle de l'échantillon
de roche dans des conditions correspondant à la déformation (220).
16. Support selon la revendication 15, dans lequel la pluralité d'opérations comprend
en outre les étapes telles que définies dans la revendication 2 ou l'une quelconque
des revendications 4 à 6.