Technical field
[0001] The present invention belongs to the field of catalytic chemistry, and more specifically
to catalyzed reduction chemical reactions, preferably the reduction of CO
2 into small molecules.
[0002] The present invention relates to a new copper based electrocatalyst material and
its method of preparation comprising a step of in-situ electrodeposition or co-electrodeposition,
in an electrolyte solution, of at least one catalytic metal in the presence of a gas
comprising CO
2 under electroreduction conditions onto a conductive support, wherein the at least
one catalytic metal comprises copper (Cu) and is electrodeposited onto the conductive
support and wherein the gas is supersaturated (
i.e. with CO
2 concentrations above the saturation limit) in the electrolyte solution and its use
thereof in a reduction chemical reaction, preferably in the reduction of CO
2 into CO or other small molecules such as gaseous hydrocarbons (methane, ethylene)
or liquid molecules (ethanol, formic acid). The invention also relates to the process
of manufacture of said catalyst compound. The invention thus also relates to a process
electrochemical conversion of CO
2 to small molecules.
[0003] In the description below, references between
[ ] refer to the list of references at the end of the examples.
Technical background
[0004] The release of carbon dioxide (CO
2) is a major concern for the environment. Its capture and recycling into small organic
bricks such as carbon monoxide (CO), formic acid, methane or methanol could prove
to be very advantageous.
[0005] Particularly, the conversion of CO
2 into small molecules such as gaseous hydrocarbons (methane, ethylene) or liquid molecules
(methanol, ethanol, formic acid) is an attractive method as these molecules can be
used as fuels or organic bricks for the production of longer hydrocarbon molecules
[1-3]. Currently, copper-based catalysts (Cu) can convert CO
2 in small multicarbon organic molecules but their efficiency is still limited - preventing
its use in industrial process
[4,5].
[0006] While active and selective catalysts for CO
2 reduction to the C
1 product have achieve significant progress towards industrial developments over the
past recent years, the formation of multicarbon molecules with superior energy density
and higher commercial values is more desirable but remains a challenge. To date, only
handful of systems have demonstrated the direct conversion of CO
2 to the hydrocarbons and oxygenates with 3 or more carbons (C
3+) and the corresponding Faradaic efficiency typically remains below 20 %. Previous
reports have pointed out that modulating local CO
2 concentration can enhance the C-C coupling in CO
2RR. The moderate coverage of *CO on the surface of catalyst was also found to be beneficial
for the CO
2RR into C
3+ products. Cu-based alloys have been identified to enhance the selectivity towards
C
3+ products by modulating the adsorption of *CO intermediates on the catalyst surface.
Cavities on the catalyst surface have also demonstrated larger selectivity for the
formation of propanol thanks to the confinement of the intermediates. These examples
however rely on the use of CO instead on CO
2 that are involved in the C-C dimerization step associated with the formation of multicarbon
molecules.
[0007] Usually, for the CO
2 reduction reaction (CO2RR), CO
2 feeds from highly concentrated sources or special CO
2-capturing devices are required, because the low concentration of CO
2 makes it very difficult to be effectively adsorbed and activated on the surface of
most catalysts, and the anaerobic atmosphere is requisite to prevent the adverse oxidation
reaction from happening.
Detailed description of the invention
[0008] The Applicant has developed a new method to produce a copper based electrocatalyst
compound that solves all the problems listed above.
[0009] The present invention deals with a new copper based electrocatalyst material, its
manufacturing process and its applications, such as a method to convert CO
2 into small molecules (such as ethylene, ethanol and isopropanol) at room temperature
and atmospheric pressure or higher. Being able to produce such small molecules at
room temperature and atmospheric pressure in large quantities is, to the knowledge
of Applicant, something that was not observed in the art.
[0010] The applicant surprisingly found out that using a copper (Cu) based electrocatalyst
material prepared according to the method of the invention gives very good yields
in the conversion of CO
2 into small molecules under CO
2 supersaturated conditions. It is meant by "supersaturated conditions", conditions
where the CO
2 concentrations is above the solubility limit of CO
2 in the electrolyte at a defined pressure. Supersaturation may be up to 6 times larger
than the solubility limit of CO
2 in the electrolyte at atmospheric pressure and up to 120 times at a pressure of 20
bar. Specifically, it was identified that the performance of the copper based electrocatalyst
material of the invention is considerably improved by combining two parameters:
- 1) manufacturing the catalyst in a CO2 supersaturated electrolyte; and then
- 2) performing the conversion reaction (reduction) of CO2 in CO2-supersaturated electrolyte.
[0011] The electrocatalyst material of the invention is therefore both prepared and used
in CO
2 supersaturated electrolyte.
[0012] These two conditions allow increasing the current density and improving the selectivity
of the reaction towards the production of C
3+ molecules (typically isopropanol). The Faradaic efficiency reachs a maximum of 59
% at -0.73 V versus RHE for CO
2 concentration of 3 mol L
-1 under a CO
2 pressure of 10 bar.
[0013] The copper based electrocatalyst material of the invention is based on monometallic
(Cu) crystals or dendric alloy (Ag-Cu) on a conducting support (typically a commercial
carbon support such as a gas diffusion layer or a graphite foil electrode) according
to the method of the invention. The copper based electrocatalyst material of the invention
may present a dendric morphology.
[0014] A first object of the invention is a method of preparing an copper based electrocatalyst
material, comprising a step of in-situ electrodeposition or co-electrodeposition,
in an electrolyte solution, of at least one catalytic metal in the presence of a gas
comprising CO
2 under electroreduction conditions onto a conductive support, wherein
- the at least one catalytic metal comprises copper (Cu) and is electrodeposited or
co-electrodeposited onto the conductive support and,
- the gas is supersaturated in the electrolyte solution.
[0015] Advantageously, in the method according to the invention, the at least one catalytic
metal may further comprise silver (Ag). The at least one catalytic metal may consist
of copper and silver. The atomic ratio Cu:Ag may be from 1:9 to 9.9:0.1, preferably
from 7:3 to 9.8:0.2, more prefereably from 8.5:1.5 to 9.5:0.5 or even preferably 9:1.
The atomic ratio Cu:Ag may be tuned by adjusting the ratio of Cu and Ag precursors
respectively.
[0016] Advantageously, in the method according to the invention, the electrolyte solution
may be a carbonated water-based electrolyte solution. The carbonated water-based electrolyte
is preferably chosen from CsHCO
3, KHCO
3 and K
2SO
4, preferably CsHCO
3. The concentration of carbonated water-based electrolyte may be from 0.5 mol L
-1 to 5.0 mol L
-1, preferably from 0.5 mol L
-1 to 1.5 mol L
-1, more prefereably 1 mol L
-1.
[0017] Advantageously, in the method according to the invention, the gas may comprise from
0.04 wt.% to 100 wt.% of CO
2. Preferably, the gas is CO
2.
[0018] Advantageously, in the method according to the invention, the electrolyte solution
is an aqueous solution. The electrolyte may be supersaturated in gas. The concentration
of the gas, in the electrolyte solution, may be from 0.05 to 7.5 mol L
-1, while gas pressure may be up to 25 bar in the reactor. The gas concentration may
depend on the pressure and the temperature applied to the electrolyte solution. The
concentration may thus be from 0.05 to 0.3 mol L
-1, at atmospheric pressure (1 ATM), at a temperature from 15 to 25°C. The concentration
may be from > 0.3 to 7.5 mol L
-1, at a pressure from > 1 bar to 25 bar, at a temperature from 15 to 25°C.
[0019] Advantageously, in the method according to the invention, the concentration of the
gas is preferably maintained constant by continuous gas injection in the electrolyte
during the step of in-situ electrodeposition or co-electrodeposition.
[0020] Advantageously, the conductive support may be a carbon based conductive support.
Preferably, the conductive support may be a gas diffusion layer (GDL) or a graphite
foil electrode. The conductive support may be hydrophilic. The method according to
the invention may thus further comprise a step of hydrophilic pre-treatment of the
conductive support followe by the step of in-situ electrodeposition or co-electrodeposition.
[0021] Advantageously, in the method according to the invention, the electrodeposition or
co-electrodeposition is provided under a voltage of -0.80 to -2.20 V vs. Ag / AgCI
(KCI saturated).
[0022] Advantageously, in the method according to the invention, the electrodeposition or
co-electrodeposition may be provided under a current density from 1 mA cm
-2 to 50 mA cm
-2, preferably from 10 mA cm
-2 to 20 mA cm
-2, for total charge of 30 C corresponding to a loading amount of 5 mg cm
-2. Preferably, in the method according to the invention, the electrodeposition or co-electrodeposition
may be provided under a current density of from 1.0 to 20.0 mA cm
-2. Copper (Cu) and the optional at least one further catalytic metal (Ag) may be electrodeposited
(or co-electrodeposited) using a current density from 1.0 mA cm
-2 to 20 mA cm
-2, preferably from 5 mA cm
-2 to 15 mA cm
-2, preferably 10 mA cm
-2.
[0023] Advantageously, in the method according to the invention, the quantity of deposited
silver and optional at least one further catalytic metal (Cu) may be from 0.5 C cm
-2 to 50 C cm
-2, preferably from 15 C cm
-2 to 35 C cm
-2. Preferably, the quantity of deposited Cu and optional Ag may be comprised from 15
C cm
-2 to 35 C cm
-2, and more preferably from 20 C cm
-2 to 30 C cm
-2.
[0024] Advantageously, in the method according to the invention, the source of silver (Ag)
may be AgNO
3 or CH
3COOAg, preferably AgNO
3.
[0025] Advantageously, in the method according to the invention, the source of copper (Cu)
may be CuSO
4 and Cu(NO
3)
2, preferably CuSO
4.
[0026] Advantageously, in the method according to the invention, the electrodeposition or
co-electrodeposition of copper and the optional at least one further catalytic metal
(Ag) may be done using a carbon based-gas diffusion layer (GDL), a Pt plate, and Ag/AgCl
(saturated with KCI) respectively as the working, counter, and reference electrodes,
respectively. Alternatively, the process can be done using a 2-electrode configuration
using a carbon-based gas diffusion layer (GDL) and a Pt plate respectively as the
working and counter electrodes, respectively.
[0027] The invention also relates to a copper based electrocatalyst material obtained according
to the method of the invention. The copper based electrocatalyst material may comprise
at least one catalytic material and a conductive support. The at least one catalytic
metal may be in the form of a monometallic crystal or dendric alloy. The at least
one catalytic metal may be in the form of a metallic layer. The layer of monometallic
crystal or dendric alloy on the conductive support may have a thickness from 5.0 to
15.0 µm. The thickness may depend on the loading amount of the catalyst and the skilled
person may adapt depending on the application.
[0028] The invention also relates to a process of conversion of CO
2 into small molecules, such as ethylene, ethanol and isopropanol, comprising a step
of contacting CO
2 (gas) with a copper based electrocatalyst material according to the invention. The
conversion reaction of CO
2 may be done in a supersaturated electrolyte by the use of an applied CO
2 pressure ranging from 1.0 bar to 25.0 bar and at a temperature from 15 to 40°C, with
CO
2 (gas) at a concentration from 0.05 to 7.5 mol L
-1. The CO
2 concentration may depend on the pressure and the temperature applied to the electrolyte
solution. Under atmospheric pressure, the concentration may thus be from 0.05 to 0.3
mol L
-1, at a temperature from 15 to 25°C. The concentration may be from > 0.3 to 7.5 mol
L
-1, at a pressure from > 1 bar to 25 bar, at a temperature from 15 to 25°C.
[0029] Advantageously, in the process according to the invention, the concentration of the
CO
2 is preferably maintained constant by continuous gas injection in the electrolyte
during the step of in-situ electrodeposition or co-electrodeposition.
[0030] Advantageously, in the process according to the invention, the electrolyte is a carbonated
water-based electrolyte. The carbonated water-based electrolyte is preferably chosen
from CsHCO
3, KHCO
3 and K
2SO
4, preferably CsHCO
3. The concentration of the carbonated water-based electrolyte may be from 0.5 mol
L
-1 to 5.0 mol L
-1, preferably from 0.5 mol L
-1 to 1.5 mol L
-1, more preferably 1 mol L
-1.
[0031] The invention further relates to the use of the copper based electrocatalyst material
according to the invention as a catalyst, preferably to convert CO
2 into small molecules. It is meant by small molecules, molecules such as CO, CH
4, C
2H
4, C
2H
5OH and isopropanol.
[0032] In particular, some advantages of the copper based electrocatalyst material according
to the invention are listed below:
- the electrocatalyst material according to the invention can be easily obtained by
electrodepositing Cu or co-electrodepositing an Ag-Cu alloy;
- using an supersaturated carbonated water-based electrolyte greatly improves the selectivity
of the reaction on the catalyst toward the reduction of CO2 into molecules with two or more carbons.
- the gas (i.e. air or CO2) oversaturation allow increasing the current density and improving the selectivity
of the reaction towards the production of C2+ molecules (such as ethylene, ethanol and isopropanol) ;
- the electrocatalyst material according to the invention achieved increased current
density and improved selectivity of the reaction towards the production of C3 molecules (mainly isopropanol) up to -60 mA cm-2 and 58 % at -0.73 V vs. RHE using the high-pressure reactor configuration with 10 bar of CO2, corresponding to a CO2 concentration of 3 mol L-1. For comparison, current density and Faradaic efficiency of -17.5 mA cm-2 and ~39.6 % for isopropanol were achieved when using a carbonated electrolyte at
at atmospheric pressure.
- the electrocatalyst material according to the invention allows the production of both
the liquid and the gaseous product, notably C2+ molecules with high added values
- the electrocatalyst material according to the invention have a total current density
over 36.5 mA cm-2 at -0.73 V vs. RHE in a three-electrode configuration at 1 ATM;
- the electrocatalyst material according to the invention has a specific current density
over 17. 5 mA cm-2 for isopropanol for CO2 at -0.73 V vs. RHE at atmospheric pressure.
Brief description of the figures
[0033]
Figure 1 represents the characterization of the CuAg alloy decorated electrodes. (a)
Electrochemical deposition curve for the CuAg alloy electrode at different deposition
current with the total loading amount of 10 mg. (b) As prepared electrode with the
geometric area of 2 cm2. (c-d) SEM images of CuAg sample synthesized under CO2 supersaturated with (c) low and (d) high deposition current. (e) XRD spectrum of
the Cu, Ag, CuAg without supersaturated (CE1) and CuAg with supersaturated samples
(EM1).
Figure 2 represents the Faradaic efficiencies for each CO2RR product and H2 on CuAg alloy catalyst (A) electrodeposition (E-deposition) without CO2 supersaturated (CE1), CO2RR without CO2 supersaturated; (B) E-deposition with CO2 supersaturated (EM1), CO2RR without CO2 supersaturated; (C) E-deposition without CO2 supersaturated (CE1), CO2RR without CO2 supersaturated; (D) E-deposition with CO2 supersaturated (EM1), CO2RR with CO2 supersaturated at various potentials ranging from - 0.4 to -1.2 V vs. RHE in 0.5
mol L-1 CsHCO3.
Figure 3 represents the evolution of the (a) specific current density of each product
and (b) the specific current density of each CO2 reduction product.
Figure 4 represents the Faradaic efficiencies for each CO2RR product and H2 on CuAg alloy catalyst (A) E-deposition without CO2 supersaturated (CE1), CO2RR without CO2 supersaturated; (B) E-deposition with CO2 supersaturated (EM1), CO2RR without CO2 supersaturated; (C) E-deposition without CO2 supersaturated (CE1), CO2RR without CO2 supersaturated; (D) E-deposition with CO2 supersaturated (EM1), CO2RR with CO2 supersaturated at various potentials ranging from -0.4 to -1.2 V vs. RHE in 1.0 mol
L-1 CsHCO3.
Figure 5 represents the Faradaic efficiencies for each CO2RR product and H2 on CuAg alloy catalyst E-deposition with CO2 supersaturated, CO2 RR with CO2 supersaturated at various potentials ranging from -0.4 to -1.2 V vs. RHE in different
concentration of CsHCO3. (A) 0.1 mol L-1; (B) 0.5 mol L-1; (C) 1.0 mol L-1; (D) 2.0 mol L-1 and (E) 5.0 mol L-1.
Figure 6 represents the Faradaic efficiencies for the CO2RR product of isopropanol on CuAg alloy catalyst EM1 at various potentials ranging
from -0.4 to -1.0 V vs. RHE in 1.0 mol L-1 KHCO3 in high-pressure CO2 electrolyzer with different CO2 solubility.
Figure 7 represents the long-term stability measurement of CuAg alloy catalyst EM1
in CO2-supersaturated 1.0 mol L-1 CsHCO3 aqueous electrolyte under a 10 bar CO2 and room temperature (25 °C) at -0.80 V vs. RHE for 200 hours.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Preparation of an electrocatalyst material 1 (EM1) according to the invention
[0034] The CuAg bimetallic electrode (Cu
xAg
1-x, with x = 0.9, 0.7, 0.5, 0.3, 0.1) was obtained through a chronoamperometry two-electrode
co-electrodeposition approach with hydrophilic pre-treated gas diffusion layer (GDL)
as working electrode and Pt foil as the counter electrode, respectively. A 0.2 mol
L
-1 CuSO
4·5H
2O and 2 mmol L
-1 AgNO
3 mixture saturated with CO
2 was applied as the electrolyte. The conditions of pressure and temperature are the
following:
- Pressure: 1 ATM,
- Temperature: room temperature (25 degree),
- CO2 (gas) concentration: 0.3 mol L-1 (supersaturated concentration : 0.05 mol L-1).
[0035] The electrolyte was supersatured with CO
2 during the deposition with a CO
2 concentration of 0.3 mol L
-1. The electrodeposition on GDL was performed at a current density of 1.0 and 10 mA
cm
-2 at room temperature for the total charge of 30 C corresponding to a loading amount
of 5 mg cm
-2 (Figure 1a,b). After the deposition, the electrolyte was rinsed with deionized water
three times immediately to avoid the further galvanic reaction. The prepared electrode
was dried under Ar at room temperature and store for further measurement. As shown
from Figure 1c, the structure of CuAg alloy is cubic-like when CO
2 oversaturate is applied during the deposition with a deposition current density of
1.0 mA cm
-2. With a deposition current density 10.0 mA cm
-2, the structure of CuAg alloy is denditric (Figure 1d).
[0036] From the XRD pattern of the metal crystals, the ratio of {100}:{111} peaks (seen
at 52° and 44° respectively) of CuAg CO
2 saturated is increased compared to the same, but with no CO
2 saturation (Figure 1e).
Example 2: Preparation of an electrocatalyst material CE1 (not according to the invention)
[0037] The CuAg bimetallic electrode (Cu
xAg
1-x, with x = 0.9, 0.7, 0.5, 0.3, 0.1) was obtained through a chronoamperometry two-electrode
co-electrodeposition approach with hydrophilic pre-treated GDL as working electrode
and Pt foil as the counter electrode, respectively. As in example 1, a 0.2 M CuSO
4 · 5H
2O and 2 mM AgNO
3 mixture but saturated with Ar (instead of CO
2) was applied as the electrolyte. The conditions of pressure and temperature are the
following:
- Pressure: 1 ATM,
- Temperature: room temperature (25 degree),
- Ar (gas) : purity 99.999%.
[0038] The electrodeposited on GDL was applied at a current density of 10 mA cm
-2 for the total charge of 30 C corresponding to a loading amount of 5 mg cm
-2. After the deposition, the redundant electrolyte was rinsed with deionized water
three times immediately to avoid the further galvanic reaction. The prepared electrode
was dried under Ar flow at room temperature for further measurement.
Example 3: Comparison of the performances of the electrocatalyst materials 1 (EM1)
and counter-example 1 (CE1)
[0039] The electrocatalyst materials EM1 and CE1 (where x = 0.9) were then tested in a CO
2-supersaturated electrolyte solution comprising of 1 mol L
-1 CsHCO
3 as the electrolyte at 25°C and atmospheric pressure. The electrolyte solution was
supersaturated with CO
2 gas to reach a concentration of 0.3 mol L
-1.
[0040] Results of the selectivity of EM1 and CE1 in 0.5 mol L
-1 CsHCO
3 are summarized in Table 1, below:
Table 1: Summary of the electrocatalytic selectivity (Faradic Efficiency: FE) for
CuAg alloy electrodes EM1 (x = 0.9, electrolyte under CO
2 supersaturated) and CE1 (x = 0.9, electrolyte under Ar saturated) and the 0.5 mol
L
-1 CsHCO
3 without and with CO
2 supersaturated.
CO2 supersaturation |
-1.2V |
-1.0V |
E-dep. |
CO2RR |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
NO |
NO |
2.65 |
8.02 |
86.5 |
0.3 |
5.84 |
83.42 |
YES |
NO |
0 |
7.08 |
84.32 |
0.6 |
6.28 |
84.05 |
NO |
YES |
1.3 |
11.19 |
80.2 |
2.7 |
12.37 |
80.4 |
YES |
YES |
3.1 |
14.31 |
76.4 |
24.17 |
40.02 |
49.6 |
CO2 supersaturation |
-0.7V |
-0.6V |
E-dep. |
CO2RR |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
NO |
NO |
0.7 |
8.91 |
79.63 |
0.9 |
10.43 |
78.1 |
YES |
NO |
0.6 |
9.2 |
77.28 |
0.6 |
11.24 |
74.13 |
NO |
YES |
11.3 |
19.53 |
76.13 |
10.7 |
17.23 |
76.32 |
YES |
YES |
50.37 |
58.9 |
32.12 |
48.54 |
57.36 |
38.6 |
|
CO2 supersaturation |
-0.9V |
-0.8V |
E-dep. |
CO2RR |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
NO |
NO |
3.7 |
11.15 |
81.25 |
2.4 |
12.02 |
79.6 |
YES |
NO |
4.3 |
12.97 |
77.25 |
2.9 |
12.81 |
75.4 |
NO |
YES |
17.28 |
25.04 |
62.45 |
14.05 |
21.49 |
65.8 |
YES |
YES |
40.99 |
51.37 |
40.18 |
43.68 |
56.21 |
39.6 |
CO2 supersaturation |
-0.4V |
|
E-dep. |
CO2RR |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
NO |
NO |
0.3 |
11.47 |
76.82 |
YES |
NO |
0.2 |
9.7 |
84.32 |
NO |
YES |
6.2 |
13.91 |
80.2 |
YES |
YES |
9.76 |
16.82 |
76.4 |
[0041] The performance in terms of selectivity (Faradaic efficiency) of the reaction (FE)
and current density were compared in table 1. The results show that the CO
2 oversaturation during the electrodeposition (EM1) process translates into lower selectivity
for the hydrogen evolution reaction while the CO
2 oversaturation with CsHCO
3 electrolyte induces more C
2+ product during CO
2RR. Remarkably, when both the E-deposition process and the electrolyte for CO
2RR is CO
2 supersaturated, we observe the uncommon C
3+ liquid product: isopropanol (i-Pr-OH) at the potential window from -0.4 to -1.0 V
vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) (Figure 2-3).
Example 4: Effect of the concentration of the electrolyte in a CO2 conversion process
[0042] Experiments of example 3 were repeated with an increase in the concentration of the
electrolyte. As shown in Figure 4, when one increases the concentration of the electrolyte
from 0.5 mol L
-1 CsHCO
3 to 1.0 mol L
-1 CsHCO
3,the FE of isopropanol further increases from 36.45% to 38.62%, the total FE C
2+ increased from 50.37% to 54.67%.
[0043] Results of the selectivity of EM1 in 1.0 mol L
-1 CsHCO
3 are summarized in Table 2, below:
Table 2: Summary of the electrocatalytic selectivity (Faradic Efficiency: FE) for
CuAg alloy electrodes EM1 (x = 0.9, electrolyte under CO
2 supersaturated) and CE1 (x = 0.9, electrolyte under Ar saturated) and the 1.0 mol
L
-1 CsHCO
3 without and with CO
2 supersaturated.
CO2 supersaturation |
-1.2V |
-1.0V |
E-dep. |
CO2RR |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
NO |
NO |
15.2 |
19.22 |
69.62 |
13.49 |
21.91 |
68.52 |
YES |
NO |
15.8 |
19.1 |
68.35 |
14.55 |
24.85 |
65.46 |
NO |
YES |
12.7 |
16.3 |
61.42 |
20.28 |
31.52 |
59.12 |
YES |
YES |
33.4 |
38.56 |
44.56 |
47.03 |
59.83 |
33.8 |
CO2 supersaturation |
-0.73V |
-0.7V |
E-dep. |
CO2RR |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
NO |
NO |
11.45 |
20.67 |
66.78 |
8.6 |
16.58 |
79.63 |
YES |
NO |
12.52 |
22.32 |
64.32 |
9.3 |
14.92 |
78.65 |
NO |
YES |
21.18 |
27.01 |
56.28 |
20.2 |
28.63 |
65.12 |
YES |
YES |
55.28 |
62.71 |
32.42 |
54.67 |
60.53 |
32.11 |
|
CO2 supersaturation |
-1.2V |
-1.0V |
E-dep. |
CO2RR |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
NO |
NO |
2.65 |
8.02 |
86.5 |
0.3 |
5.84 |
83.42 |
YES |
NO |
0 |
7.08 |
84.32 |
0.6 |
6.28 |
84.05 |
NO |
YES |
1.3 |
11.19 |
80.2 |
2.7 |
12.37 |
80.4 |
YES |
YES |
3.1 |
14.31 |
76.4 |
24.17 |
40.02 |
49.6 |
CO2 supersaturation |
-0.7V |
-0.6V |
E-dep. |
CO2RR |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
C2+ |
CO2RR |
H2 |
NO |
NO |
0.7 |
8.91 |
79.63 |
0.9 |
10.43 |
78.1 |
YES |
NO |
0.6 |
9.2 |
77.28 |
0.6 |
11.24 |
74.13 |
NO |
YES |
11.3 |
19.53 |
76.13 |
10.7 |
17.23 |
76.32 |
YES |
YES |
50.37 |
58.9 |
32.12 |
48.54 |
57.36 |
38.6 |
[0044] These further results reveal that increasing the concentration of the electrolyte
is also another strategy to enhance the C
2+ efficiency with CO
2 supersaturated electrolyte.
[0045] More importantly, at a low potential of -0.73 V vs. RHE, a 39.26 % Faradaic efficiency
was obtained for isopropanol which is the highest recorded value. A FE of 55.28 %
for C
2+ products (i.e.: C
2+C
3 molecules) is also 2.61 times higher compared with the same material without CO
2 supersaturated in the electrolyte (Table 2). Importantly, no isopropanol was detected
when using the non-supersaturated electrolyte.
[0046] To the best of knowledge of the applicants, this performance is the highest ever
reported for the production of isopropanol and among the highest for C
3+ at such a low potential.
[0047] The concentration of the electrolyte was further increased. As shown in Figure 5,
when increased the concentration of the electrolyte from 1.0 mol L
-1 CsHCO
3 to 5.0 mol L
-1 CsHCO
3, the FE of isopropanol is not increasing along with the increase of the concentration
of Cs
+. These results reveal that the 1.0 mol L
-1 Cs
+ is the best parameter for adjusting the Cs
+ concentration with CO
2 supersaturated electrolyte.
Example 5: Preparation of EM1 at higher CO2 concentrations and study of their activity
[0048] A customed-designed high-pressure CO
2 electrolyzer was then used to prepare the EM1 electrodes at higher CO
2 concentrations. Using a high-pressure CO
2 electrolyzer can make the overall process to produce the multi-carbon product more
efficiently at a higher current density. The experiments were carried at out room
temperature (20°) with a CO
2 pressure from 1 up to 25 bar corresponding to CO
2 concentration in the liquid electrolyte from 0.3 M up to 7.5 M. Such a process is
indeed compatible with compressed CO
2 from the atmosphere.
[0049] Using 1.0M CsHCO
3 as electrolyte our results demonstrate a 57.61% Faradaic efficiency for isopropanol
at -0.7 V vs. RHE together under 10 bar of CO
2 with a doubled current density of 102.98 mA cm
-2 and specific current density for isopropanol of 59.33 mA cm
-2 which is ≈ 3.4 times higher compared with at the measured performed at atmospheric
pressure. (Figure 6) Importantly the long-term stability of the CuAg alloy electrodes
in a high-pressure electrolyzer under continuous operation at a CO
2 flow rate of 100 sccm and a cell voltage of -0.70 V
vs. RHE was measured. The performance of the electrode was found to be stable over 200
hours with an average FE
isopropanol of 56.08% and an average current density of around 104.71 mA cm
-2 (Figure 7). After 200 hours, the retention of the FE
isopropanol and the current density were estimated to be 94.26% and 89.53%, respectively. The
stability of the CO
2RR properties is further accompanied by high stability of the catalyst morphology
and surface
List of references
[0050]
[1] Whipple D T, Kenis P J A. Prospects of CO2 utilization via direct heterogeneous electrochemical
reduction[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2010, 1(24): 3451-3458.
[2] Xia C, Zhu P, Jiang Q, et al. Continuous production of pure liquid fuel solutions
via electrocatalytic CO2 reduction using solid-electrolyte devices[J]. Nature Energy,
2019, 4(9): 776-785.
[3] Hernández S, Farkhondehfal M A, Sastre F, et al. Syngas production from electrochemical
reduction of CO2: current status and prospective implementation[J]. Green Chemistry,
2017, 19(10): 2326-2346.
[4] Hori Y, Wakebe H, Tsukamoto T, et al. Electrocatalytic process of CO selectivity in
electrochemical reduction of CO2 at metal electrodes in aqueous media[J]. Electrochimica
Acta, 1994, 39(11-12): 1833-1839.
[5] Bagger A, Ju W, Varela A S, et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction: a classification
problem[J]. ChemPhysChem, 2017, 18(22): 3266-3273.
1. A method of preparing an copper based electrocatalyst material, comprising a step
of in-situ electrodeposition or co-electrodeposition, in an electrolyte solution,
of at least one catalytic metal in the presence of a gas comprising CO
2, under electrochemical deposition conditions onto a conductive support, wherein
- the at least one catalytic metal comprises copper and is electrodeposited or co-electrodeposited
onto the conductive support, and
- the gas comprising CO2 is supersaturated in the electrolyte solution.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one catalytic metal further
comprises silver.
3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the at least one catalytic metal consists
of copper and silver, preferably the atomic ratio Cu:Ag is from 1:9 to 9.9:0.1, preferably
7:3 to 9.8:0.2, more preferably from 8.5:1.5 to 9.5:0.5 or even preferably 9:1.
4. The method according to any of preceding claims, wherein the gas comprises from 0.04
wt.% to 100 wt.% of CO2, preferably the gas is CO2.
5. The method according to any of preceding claims, wherein the concentration of the
gas, in the electrolyte solution, is from 0.05 to 7.5 mol L-1, preferably from 0.5 to 1.5 mol L-1, more preferably 1 mol L-1.
6. The method according to preceding claim, wherein the concentration of the gas, in
the electrolyte solution, is maintained constant by continuous gas injection in the
electrolyte during the step of in-situ electrodeposition or co-electrodeposition.
7. The method according to any of preceding claims, wherein the conductive support is
a carbon-based conductive support, preferably a gas diffusion layer or a graphite
foil electrode.
8. The method according to any of preceding claims, comprising a step of hydrophilic
pre-treatment of the conductive support.
9. The method according to any of preceding claims, wherein the electrodeposition or
co-electrodeposition is provided under a voltage of -0.80 to -2.20 V vs. Ag / AgCI
(KCI saturated).
10. The method according to any of preceding claims, wherein the controlling electrodeposition
or co-electrodeposition is provided under a current density of 1.0 to 20.0 mA cm-2.
11. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the electrolyte solution
is a carbonated water-based electrolyte solution, and wherein the carbonated water-based
electrolyte is preferably chosen from CsHCO3,KHCO3 and K2SO4, preferably CsHCO3, preferably at a concentration from 0.5 mol L-1 to 5.0 mol L-1, preferably 0.5 to 1.5 mol L-1, more preferably 1 mol L-1.
12. A copper based electrocatalyst material obtained according to the method of any of
the preceding claims, comprising at least one catalytic material and a conductive
support.
13. The copper based electrocatalyst material according to the preceding claim, wherein
the at least one catalytic metal is in the form of a monometallic crystal or dendric
alloy.
14. The copper based electrocatalyst material according to the preceding claim, wherein
the layer of monometallic crystal or dendric alloy on the conductive support has a
thickness from 5.0 to 15.0 µm.
15. A process of conversion of CO2 into small molecules, such as ethylene, ethanol and isopropanol, comprising a step
of contacting CO2 with a copper based electrocatalyst material according to any of claims 12 to 14.
16. The process according to the preceding claim, wherein the conversion reaction of CO2 is done under a pressure from 1.0 bar to 25.0 bar and at a temperature from 15 to
25°C, in an solution comprising an electrolyte and CO2 (gas) at a concentration from 0.05 to 7.5 mol L-1.
17. The process according to the preceding claim, wherein the electrolyte is a carbonated
water-based electrolyte, and wherein the carbonated water-based electrolyte is preferably
chosen from CsHCO3, KHCO3 and K2SO4, preferably at a concentration from 0.5 mol L-1 to 5.0 mol L-1, more preferably from 0.5 mol L-1 to 1.5 mol L-1, more prefereably 1 mol L-1.
18. Use of the copper based electrocatalyst material according to any of claims 12 to
15 to convert CO2 into small molecules, such as ethylene, ethanol and isopropanol.