[0001] The present invention relates to a polyethylene blend of a specific multimodal metallocene
catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) and a specific low density polyethylene
(LDPE), which provides films with well-balanced properties, especially dart drop (impact
strength), haze and processability.
[0002] High standards are nowadays required for packaging materials. Quite often properties
are required in the packaging industry, which are conflicting. Typically, high stiffness
and toughness are required in parallel. To achieve these different properties seldom
pure components, but rather combinations of different polymer components are used.
Two different approaches mainly are at the skilled person's disposal: (a) blends of
two or more polymers to form a heterophasic structure, or (b) producing a multilayer
structure with different materials providing different functions. Both of them are
applied in industry.
[0003] Due to the different requirements nowadays multilayer packaging with different type
of materials are used, which from one side serve the needs, but from the other side
such structures make recycling difficult. Therefore using pure materials is preferred,
i.e. a packaging with 'mono-materials', i.e. only polyethylene based polymers, is
really appreciated. However, this imposes higher requirement to the performance of
materials themselves, a material with balanced performance is therefore highly appreciated.
[0004] mLLDPE attracts specific interests due to its excellence balance between cost and
performance. The main drawback is that the processability and optics are rather poor.
One common way is to blend the mLLDPE with LDPE, however, this is known to worsen
other properties, like sealing and impact.
[0005] As stated above the recycling of packaging material after their first use is an important
topic nowadays. It is much more challenging to recycle packaging films made of different
materials, e.g. different plastics, than to recycle mono-material solutions. On the
other hand, the use of different materials is sometimes necessary to obtain acceptable
properties, like mechanical properties. Therefore, an objective of the present invention
is the provision of a polyethylene based mono-material solution, which provides good
processability, good optical properties and mechanical properties, especially dart
drop (impact strength). In other words, a material is desirable that provides an advantageous
combination of processability, good optics and mechanical properties, especially haze
and dart drop, to films prepared from such a material.
[0006] The present inventors have found that a blend of a specific multimodal metallocene
catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) and a specific low density polyethylene
(LDPE), provides films with well-balanced properties, especially dart drop (impact
strength), haze and processability.
Summary of Invention
[0007] The present invention is therefore directed to a polyethylene blend comprising
- a) 51.0 wt% to 95.0 wt%, based on the total weight of the polyethylene blend, of a
multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) which consists
of
- (i) 30.0 to 70.0 wt% of an ethylene-1-butene polymer component (A), and
- (ii) 70.0 to 30.0 wt% of an ethylene-1-hexene polymer component (B),
whereby the ethylene-1-butene polymer component (A) has
a density in the range of from 920 to 950 kg/m3,
a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 2.0 to 400.0 g/10 min,
a 1-butene content, based on the ethylene-1-butene polymer component (A), of 1.5 to
8.0 wt%, and
the ethylene polymer component (B) has
a density in the range of from 895 to 918 kg/m3,
a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 0.01 to 1.5 g/10 min,
a 1-hexene content, based on the ethylene-1-hexene polymer component (B), of 8.0 to
25.0 wt%,
whereby the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE)
has a density in the range of 905 to 940 kg/m3,
a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 0.3 to 5.0 g/10 min and
a ratio of the MFR21 (190°C, 21.6 kg, ISO 1133) to MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133), MFR21/MFR2, in the range of 20 to 50;
a branching index g'85-100 (determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) as described in the experimental
part) of < 1.00 and
- b) 1.0 to 49.0 wt%, based on the total weight of the polyethylene blend, of a low
density polyethylene (LDPE) whereby said LDPE has
a density in the range of 910 to 940 kg/m3; and
a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 1.5 to 20.0 g/10 min,
whereby the ratio of the MFR2 of the LDPE to the MFR2 of the mLLDPE is > 1.00.
[0008] In an embodiment of the present invention, the ethylene-1-butene polymer component
(A) of the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE)
consists of an ethylene polymer fraction (A-1) and an ethylene polymer fraction (A-2).
[0009] Unexpectedly the above defined blend of the invention provides excellent processability
in combination with good dart drop strength and low haze to films comprising such
blends. The invention is therefore further direct to films comprising the above defined
polyethylene blend.
Definitions
[0010] Where the term "comprising" is used in the present description and claims, it does
not exclude other non-specified elements of major or minor functional importance.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term "consisting of" is considered
to be a preferred embodiment of the term "comprising of". If hereinafter a group is
defined to comprise at least a certain number of embodiments, this is also to be understood
to disclose a group, which preferably consists only of these embodiments.
[0011] Whenever the terms "including" or "having" are used, these terms are meant to be
equivalent to "comprising" as defined above.
[0012] Where an indefinite or definite article is used when referring to a singular noun,
e.g. "a", "an" or "the", this includes a plural of that noun unless something else
is specifically stated.
[0013] Metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) is defined in this
invention as linear low density polyethylene copolymer, which has been produced in
the presence of a metallocene catalyst.
[0014] For the purpose of the present invention "metallocene catalysed linear low density
polyethylene (mLLDPE) which consists of an ethylene-1-butene polymer component (A)
and an ethylene-1-hexene polymer component (B)" means that the mLLDPE is produced
in an at least 2-stage sequential polymerization process, wherein first component
(A) is produced and component (B) is then produced in the presence of component (A)
in a subsequent polymerization step, yielding the mLLDPE or vice versa, i.e. first
component (B) is produced and component (A) is then produced in the presence of component
(B) in a subsequent polymerization step, yielding the mLLDPE .
[0015] Low density polyethylene (LDPE) is defined in this invention as low density polyethylene
copolymer, which has been produced in a high-pressure process.
[0016] Term "multimodal" in context of multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density
polyethylene means herein multimodality with respect to melt flow rate (MFR)) of at
least the ethylene polymer components (A) and (B), i.e. the ethylene polymer components
(A) and (B), have different MFR values. The multimodal metallocene catalysed linear
low density polyethylene can have further multimodality between the ethylene polymer
components (A) and (B) with respect to one or more further properties, like density,
comonomer type and/or comonomer content, as will be described later below.
Detailed description of Invention
[0017] The polyethylene blend according to the present invention comprises, preferably consists
of a) a multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE)
and b) a low density polyethylene (LDPE).
[0018] Thus the blend comprises
- a) 51.0 wt% to 99.0 wt%, preferably 65.0 wt% to 98.0 wt%, more preferably 75.0 wt%
to 96.0 wt% and even more preferably 80.0 wt% to 92.0 wt%, based on the total weight
of the polyethylene blend, of the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density
polyethylene (mLLDPE) and
- b) 1.0 to 49.0 wt%, preferably 2.0 wt% to 35.0 wt%, more preferably 4.0 wt% to 25.0
wt% and even more preferably 8.0 wt% to 20.0 wt%, based on the total weight of the
polyethylene blend, of the low density polyethylene (LDPE).
[0019] In an embodiment the blend consists of a) and b) only, thus the total amounts of
a) + b) summing up to 100 wt%.
Ad multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE)
[0020] The multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) is
referred herein as "multimodal", since the ethylene-1-butene polymer component (A),
optionally including ethylene polymer fractions (A-1) and (A-2), and ethylene-1-hexene
polymer component (B) have been produced under different polymerization conditions
resulting in different Melt Flow Rates (MFR, e.g. MFR
2). I.e. the multimodal PE is multimodal at least with respect to difference in MFR
of the ethylene polymer components (A) and (B).
[0021] The multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) consists
of
- (i) 30.0 to 70.0 wt% of an ethylene-1-butene polymer component (A), and
- (ii) 70.0 to 30.0 wt% of an ethylene-1-hexene polymer component (B).
[0022] The amount of (A) and (B) add up to 100.0 wt%.
[0023] In an embodiment of the present invention, the ethylene-1-butene polymer component
(A) consists of an ethylene polymer fraction (A-1) and (A-2).
[0024] It is possible that fraction (A-1) is produced first and then fraction (A-2) is produced
in the presence of fraction (A-1) in a subsequent reactor or vice versa, i.e fraction
(A-2) is produced first and then fraction (A-1) is produced in the presence of fraction
(A-2) in a subsequent reactor. Preferably fraction (A-1) is produced first.
[0025] In case that the ethylene-1-butene polymer component (A) consists of ethylene polymer
fractions (A-1) and (A-2), the MFR
2 of the ethylene polymer fractions (A-1) and (A-2) may be different from each other
or may be the same.
[0026] The ethylene polymer fraction (A-1) has a MFR
2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 1.0 to 800.0 g/10 min, preferably of 1.5
to 400.0 g/10 min, more preferably of 2.0 to 200.0 g/10 min and even more preferably
of 2.5 to 50.0 g/10 min, like 3.0 to 20.0 g/10 min
[0027] The ethylene polymer fraction (A-2) has a MFR
2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 1.5 to 400.0 g/10 min, preferably of 2.0
to 200.0 g/10 min, more preferably of 2.5 to 40.0 g/10 min and most preferably of
3.0 to 10.0 g/10 min.
[0028] The MFR
2 of the ethylene polymer components (A) and (B) are different from each other.
[0029] The ethylene polymer component (A) has a MFR
2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 2.0 to 400 g/10 min, preferably of 2.5
to 300 g/10 min, more preferably of 3.0 to 200 g/10 min, even more preferably of 3.2
to 100 g/10 min and still more preferably of 3.5 to 20.0 g/10 min, like 3.8 to 10.0
g/10 min.
[0030] The ethylene polymer component (B) has a MFR
2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 0.01 to 1.5 g/10 min, preferably of 0.05
to 1.5 g/10 min, more preferably of 0.1 to 1.2 g/10 min and even more preferably of
0.2 to 1.0 g/10 min.
[0031] The MFR
2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) of the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density
polyethylene (mLLDPE) is in the range of 0.3 to 5.0 g/10 min, preferably 0.8 to 4.0
g/10 min, more preferably 1.0 to 2.5 g/10 min.
[0032] The multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) has
a ratio of the MFR
21 (190°C, 21.6 kg, ISO 1133) to MFR
2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133), MFR
21/MFR
2, in the range of from 20 to 50, preferably from 22 to 40, more preferably from 24
to 35.
[0033] In an embodiment of the invention it is preferred the ratio of the MFR
2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) of ethylene-1-butene polymer component (A) to the MFR
2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) of the final multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low
density polyethylene (mLLDPE) is at least 2.0 to 20.0, preferably 2.5 to 15.0 and
more preferably of 3.0 to 10.0.
[0034] Naturally, in addition to multimodality with respect to, i.e. difference between,
the MFR
2 of ethylene polymer components (A) and (B), the multimodal PE of the invention can
also be multimodal e.g. with respect to the density of the ethylene polymer components
(A) and (B).
[0035] Preferably, the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene
(mLLDPE) is further multimodal with respect to the comonomer content of the ethylene
polymer components (A) and (B).
[0036] The comonomer type for the polymer fractions (A-1) and (A-2) is the same, thus both
fractions therefore have 1-butene as comonomer.
[0037] The comonomer content of component (A) and (B) can be measured, or, in case, and
preferably, one of the components is produced first and the other thereafter in the
presence of the first produced in so called multistage process, then the comonomer
content of the first produced component, e.g. component (A), can be measured and the
comonomer content of the other component, e.g. component (B), can be calculated according
to following formula:
[0038] The total amount of 1-butene, based on the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear
low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) is preferably in the range of 0.6 to 3.0 wt%, preferably
0.8 to 2.5 wt% and more preferably 1.0 to 2.0 wt%.
[0039] The total amount of 1-hexene, based on the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear
low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) is preferably in the range of 2.0 to 20.0 wt%, preferably
4.0 to 18.0 wt%m more preferably 5.0 to 15.0 wt% and still more preferably .
[0040] The total amount (wt%) of 1-butene, present in the ethylene-1-butene polymer component
(A) is of 1.5 to 8.0 wt%, preferably of 1.8 to 6.0 wt%, more preferably of 2.0 to
5.0 wt%, even more preferably of 2.5 to 4.0 wt%, based on the ethylene-1-butene polymer
component (A).
[0041] The total amount (wt%) of 1-hexene, present in the ethylene-1-hexene polymer component
(B) is of 8.0 to 25.0 wt%, preferably of 9.0 to 20.0 wt%, more preferably of 10.0
to 18.0 wt%, based on the ethylene-1-hexene polymer component (B).
[0042] Even more preferably the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene
(mLLDPE) of the invention is further multimodal with respect to difference in density
between the ethylene polymer component (A) and ethylene polymer component (B). Preferably,
the density of ethylene polymer component (A) is different, preferably higher, than
the density of the ethylene polymer component (B).
[0043] The density of the ethylene polymer component (A) is in the range of 920 to 950 kg/m
3, preferably of 922 to 945 kg/m
3, more preferably 925 to 940 kg/m
3 and/or the density of the ethylene polymer component (B) is of in the range of 895
to 918 kg/m
3, preferably of 898 to 915 kg/m
3 and more preferably of 900 to 912 kg/m
3.
[0044] The polymer fraction (A-1) has a density in the range of from 920 to 950 kg/m
3, preferably of 922 to 945 kg/m
3, more preferably of 925 to 940 kg/m
3, like 928 to 935 kg/m
3.
[0045] The density of the polymer fraction (A-2) is in the range of from 920 to 950 kg/m
3, preferably of 925 to 945 kg/m
3.
[0046] The density of the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene
(mLLDPE) is in the range of 905 to 940 kg/m
3, preferably of 910.0 to 930 kg/m
3 and more preferably of 915.0 to 925.0 kg/m
3.
[0047] More preferably the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene
(mLLDPE) is multimodal at least with respect to, i.e. has a difference between, the
MFR
2, the comonomer content as well as with respect to, i.e. has a difference between
the density of the ethylene polymer components, (A) and (B), as defined above, below
or in the claims including any of the preferable ranges or embodiments of the polymer
composition.
[0048] The multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) furthermore
has a branching index g'
85-100 of < 1.00, preferably up to 0.98 and more preferably up to 0.96. The branching index
g'
85-100 is preferably at least 0.70, more preferably at least 0.80 and even more preferably
at least 0.85.
[0049] Thus, preferred ranges are 0.70 to < 1.00, preferably 0.80 to 0.98 and more preferably
0.85 to 0.96.
[0050] The branching index g'
85-100 correlates with the amount of branches of a polymer in the high molecular weight
fraction, to be more precise in the fraction which represents 15 wt% of the polymers
with the highest molecular weight of the mLLDPEs. The branching index g'
85-100 is defined in the following way:
where g' is defined as the ratio of the intrinsic viscosity of the branched polymer
[IV]
br over is the intrinsic viscosity of the linear polymer [IV]
lin at the same molecular weight (g' = [IV]
Br/[IV]
lin and a
i is the corresponded area of the concentration detector which is proportional to the
weight fraction. Thereby, a low g'-value is an indicator for a high branched polymer.
In other words, if the g'-value decreases, the branching content of the polymer increases.
[0051] The branching index is determined via GPC-VISC-LS.
[0052] It is within the scope of the invention, that the first and the second ethylene polymer
fraction (A-1 and A-2) of the ethylene polymer component (A) are present in a weight
ratio of 4:1 up to 1:4, such as 3:1 to 1:3, or 2:1 to 1:2, or 1:1.
[0053] The ethylene polymer component (A) is present in an amount of 30.0 to 70.0 wt% based
on the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE),
preferably in an amount of 32.0 to 55.0 wt% and even more preferably in an amount
of 34.0 to 45.0 wt%. Thus, the ethylene polymer component (B) is present in an amount
of 70.0 to 30.0 wt% based on the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density
polyethylene (mLLDPE), preferably in an amount of 68.0 to 45.0 wt% and more preferably
in an amount of 66.0 to 55.0 wt%.
[0054] The multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE), can
be produced in a 2-stage process, preferably comprising a slurry reactor (loop reactor),
whereby the slurry (loop) reactor is connected in series to a gas phase reactor (GPR),
whereby either ethylene component (A) or ethylene component (B) is produced in the
loop reactor and the other ethylene polymer component is then produced in GPR in the
presence of the first produced ethylene polymer component to produce the multimodal
metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE), preferably the ethylene
polymer component (A) is produced in the loop reactor and the ethylene polymer component
(B) is produced in GPR in the presence of the ethylene polymer component (A) to produce
the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE).
[0055] In case that the ethylene component (A) of the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear
low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) consists of ethylene polymer fractions (A-1) and
(A-2), the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE)
can be produced with a 3-stage process, preferably comprising a first slurry reactor
(loop reactor 1), whereby the first slurry loop reactor is connected in series with
another slurry reactor (loop reactor 2), so that the first ethylene polymer fraction
(A-1) produced in the loop reactor 1 is fed to the loop reactor 2, wherein the second
ethylene polymer fraction (A-2) is produced in the presence of the first fraction
(A-1). The loop reactor 2 is thereby connected in series to a gas phase reactor (GPR),
so that the first ethylene polymer component (A) leaving the second slurry reactor
is fed to the GPR to produce a trimodal polyethylene copolymer. In this case, the
reaction conditions in the two slurry reactors are chosen in a way that in the two
slurry reactors different products in view of MFR and/or density are produced.
[0057] A suitable process is the Borstar PE process or the Borstar PE 3G process.
[0058] The multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) according
to the present invention is therefore preferably produced in a loop loop gas cascade.
Such polymerization steps may be preceded by a prepolymerization step. The purpose
of the prepolymerization is to polymerize a small amount of polymer onto the catalyst
at a low temperature and/or a low monomer concentration. By prepolymerization it is
possible to improve the performance of the catalyst in slurry and/or modify the properties
of the final polymer. The prepolymerization step is preferably conducted in slurry
and the amount of polymer produced in an optional prepolymerization step is counted
to the amount (wt%) of ethylene polymer component (A).
[0059] The catalyst components are preferably all introduced to the prepolymerization step
when a prepolymerization step is present. However, where the solid catalyst component
and the cocatalyst can be fed separately it is possible that only a part of the cocatalyst
is introduced into the prepolymerization stage and the remaining part into subsequent
polymerization stages. Also in such cases it is necessary to introduce so much cocatalyst
into the prepolymerization stage that a sufficient polymerization reaction is obtained
therein.
[0060] It is understood within the scope of the invention, that the amount or polymer produced
in the prepolymerization lies within 1 to 5 wt% in respect to the final metallocene
catalysed multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE).
This can counted as part of the first ethylene polymer component (A).
Catalyst
[0061] The multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) used
in the process of the invention is one made using a metallocene catalyst. A metallocene
catalyst comprises a metallocene complex and a cocatalyst. The metallocene compound
or complex is referred herein also as organometallic compound (C).
[0062] The organometallic compound (C) comprises a transition metal (M) of Group 3 to 10
of the Periodic Table (IUPAC 2007) or of an actinide or lanthanide.
[0063] The term "an organometallic compound (C)" in accordance with the present invention
includes any metallocene or non-metallocene compound of a transition metal, which
bears at least one organic (coordination) ligand and exhibits the catalytic activity
alone or together with a cocatalyst. The transition metal compounds are well known
in the art and the present invention covers compounds of metals from Group 3 to 10,
e.g. Group 3 to 7, or 3 to 6, such as Group 4 to 6 of the Periodic Table, (IUPAC 2007),
as well as lanthanides or actinides.
[0064] In an embodiment, the organometallic compound (C) has the following formula (I):
wherein each X is independently a halogen atom, a C1-6-alkyl group, C1-6-alkoxy group, phenyl or benzyl group;
each Het is independently a monocyclic heteroaromatic group containing at least one
heteroatom selected from O or S;
L is -R'2Si-, wherein each R' is independently C1-20-hydrocarbyl or C1-10-alkyl substituted with alkoxy having 1 to 10 carbon atoms;
M is Ti, Zr or Hf;
each R1 is the same or different and is a C1-6-alkyl group or C1-6-alkoxy group;
each n is 1 to 2;
each R2 is the same or different and is a C1-6-alkyl group, C1-6-alkoxy group or -Si(R)3 group; each R is C1-10-alkyl or phenyl group optionally substituted by 1 to 3 C1-6-alkyl groups; and each p is 0 to 1.
[0065] Preferably, the compound of formula (I) has the structure
wherein each X is independently a halogen atom, a C1-6-alkyl, C1-6-alkoxy group, phenyl or benzyl group;
L is a Me2Si-;
each R1 is the same or different and is a C1-6-alkyl group, e.g. methyl or t-Bu;
each n is 1 to 2;
R2 is a -Si(R)3 alkyl group; each p is 1;
each R is C1-6-alkyl or phenyl group.
[0066] Highly preferred complexes of formula (I) are
[0067] Most preferably the complex dimethylsilanediylbis[2-(5-trimethylsilylfuran-2-yl)-4,5-dimethylcyclopentadien-1-yl]
zirconium dichloride is used.
[0068] More preferably the ethylene polymer components (A) and (B) of the multimodal metallocene
catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) are produced using, i.e. in the
presence of, the same metallocene catalyst.
[0069] To form a catalyst, a cocatalyst, also known as an activator, is used, as is well
known in the art. Cocatalysts comprising Al or B are well known and can be used here.
The use of aluminoxanes (e.g. MAO) or boron based cocatalysts (such as borates) is
preferred. Polyethylene copolymers made using single site catalysis, as opposed to
Ziegler Natta catalysis, have characteristic features that allow them to be distinguished
from Ziegler Natta materials. In particular, the comonomer distribution is more homogeneous.
This can be shown using TREF or Crystaf techniques. Catalyst residues may also indicate
the catalyst used. Ziegler Natta catalysts would not contain a Zr or Hf group (IV)
metal for example.
[0070] The multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) may
contain further polymer components and optionally additives and/or fillers. In case
the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) contains
further polymer components, then the amount of the further polymer component(s) typically
varies between 3.0 to 20.0 wt% based on the combined amount of the multimodal metallocene
catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) and the other polymer component(s).
[0071] The optional additives and fillers and the used amounts thereof are conventional
in the field of film applications. Examples of such additives are, among others, antioxidants,
process stabilizers, UV-stabilizers, pigments, fillers, antistatic additives, antiblock
agents, nucleating agents, acid scavengers as well as polymer processing agent (PPA).
[0072] It is understood herein that any of the additives and/or fillers can optionally be
added in so-called master batch, which comprises the respective additive(s) together
with a carrier polymer. In such case the carrier polymer is not calculated to the
polymer components of the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene
(mLLDPE), but to the amount of the respective additive(s), based on the total amount
of the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) (100
wt%).
Ad low density polyethylene (LDPE)
[0073] The polyethylene blend according to the present invention comprises as component
b) a LDPE; whereby said LDPE has a density determined according to ISO 1183 in the
range of 910 to 940 kg/m
3; and a MFR
2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 1.5 to 20.0 g/10 min.
[0074] The MFR
2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) is preferably in the range of 5.0 to 18.0 g/10 min, more
preferably in the range of 8.0 to 17.0 g/10 min, even more preferably in the range
of 10.0 to 16.0 g/10min.
[0075] The density determined according to ISO 1183 of the LDPE is preferably in the range
of 912 to 935 kg/m
3, more preferably in the range of 913 to 930 kg/m
3 and even more preferably in the range of 914 to 925 kg/m
3.
[0076] Suitable LDPEs preferably have a comonomer content of 0.0 wt% to less than 15.0 wt%,
more preferably of 0.0 wt% to less than 10.0 wt%, even more preferably of 0.0 wt%
to less than 5.0 wt% and still more preferably 0.0 wt% to 1.0 wt%.
[0077] LDPEs are well known in the art and are produced in high pressure process usually
performed in a tubular reactor or an autoclave.
[0078] Such LDPEs typically contain long chain branching which differentiates LDPEs from
linear low-density polyethylenes, LLDPEs.
[0079] Suitable LDPE's are available commercially from Borealis, Basell, Exxon, Sabic, or
other suppliers.
[0080] A preferred LDPE for component b) is inter alia commercially available from Borealis
AG (Austria) under the trade names CA9150.
Polyethylene blend
[0081] In the polyethylene blend according to the present invention the ratio of the MFR
2 of the LDPE to the MFR
2 of the mLLDPE is > 1.0.
[0082] Preferably the ratio is at least 2.0, more preferably at least 5.0 and more preferably
at least 6.0.
[0083] A suitable upper limit for the ratio is 50.0.
[0084] Thus, preferably the ratio of the MFR
2 of the LDPE to the MFR
2 of the mLLDPE is in the range of > 1.00 up to 50.0, more preferably 2.0 to 40.0,
yet more preferably 5.0 to 30.0 and even more preferably 6.0 to 20.0
[0085] As mentioned above, the polyethylene blend according to the present invention provides
excellent processability in combination with good dart drop strength and low haze
to films comprising the polyethylene blend of the present invention.
[0086] The invention is therefore further direct to films comprising the above defined polyethylene
blend.
Film
[0087] The film of the invention comprises at least one layer comprising the polyethylene
blend according to the present invention. The film can be a monolayer film comprising
the polyethylene blend according to the present invention or a multilayer film, wherein
at least one layer comprises the polyethylene blend according to the present invention.
The terms "monolayer film" and multilayer film" have well known meanings in the art.
[0088] The films are preferably produced by any conventional film extrusion procedure known
in the art including cast film and blown film extrusion. Most preferably, the film
is a blown or cast film, especially a blown film. E.g. the blown film is produced
by extrusion through an annular die and blowing into a tubular film by forming a bubble
which is collapsed between nip rollers after solidification. This film can then be
slit, cut or converted (e.g. gusseted) as desired. Conventional film production techniques
may be used in this regard. If the preferable blown or cast film is a multilayer film
then the various layers are typically coextruded. The skilled man will be aware of
suitable extrusion conditions.
[0089] Films according to the present invention may be subjected to post-treatment processes,
e.g. surface modifications, lamination or orientation processes or the like. Such
orientation processes can be mono-axially (MDO) or bi-axially orientation, wherein
mono-axial orientation is preferred.
[0090] In another preferred embodiment, the films are unoriented.
[0091] Preferred films according to the invention are monolayer blown films.
[0092] The monolayer film of the invention may have a thickness of 20 to 120 µm, preferably
30 to 100 µm and more preferably 35 to 80 µm. Films of the invention are preferably
not stretched in the machine or transverse or biaxial direction.
[0093] The films of the invention are characterized by a dart-drop impact strength (DDI)
determined according to ASTM D1709, method A on a 40 µm monolayer test blown film
of at least 550 g up to 1500 g , preferably 600 g up to 1400 g and more preferably
700 g up to 1200 g, like 700 g to 1000 g.
[0094] Films according to the present invention furthermore have good optics, i.e. haze
(measured on a 40 µm monolayer test blown film according to ASTM D 1003-00) of below
15%.
[0095] Thus, the films comprising the polyethylene blend as described above may further
have a haze (measured on a 40 µm monolayer test blown film according to ASTM D 1003-00)
of below 15 %, preferably between 2 % and 12 %, more preferably between 4 % and 10
%.
[0096] In one further embodiment of the present invention, the optomechanical ability (OMA)
according to formula (II):
determined on a 40 µm test blown film is at least 12000 [MPa*g/%] up to 50000 [MPa*g/%],
preferably in the range of from 13000 [MPa*g/%] up to 40000 [MPa*g/%], more preferably
in the range of from 14000 [MPa*g/%] up to 30000 [MPa*g/%], wherein the Tensile Modulus
in machine direction is measured according to ISO 527-3 at 23°C on 40 µm test blown
films, DDI is the dart-drop impact strength determined according to ASTM D1709, method
A on a 40 µm test blown film and haze is measured according to ASTM D1003 on a 40
µm test blown film.
[0097] Thus, in a preferred embodiment, the films comprising the polyethylene blend as described
above, are characterized by having at least
- a) a dart-drop impact strength (DDI) determined according to ASTM D1709, method A
on a 40 µm monolayer test blown film of at least 550 g up to 1500 g , preferably 600
g up to 1400 g and more preferably 700 g up to 1200 g, and
- b) a haze (measured on a 40 µm monolayer test blown film according to ASTM D 1003-00)
of below 15 %, preferably between 2 % and 12 %, more preferably between 4 % and 10
% and/or
- c) an optomechanical ability (OMA) according to formula (II):
determined on a 40 µm test blown film of at least 12000 [MPa*g/%] up to 50000 [MPa*g/%],
preferably in the range of from 13000 [MPa*g/%] up to 40000 [MPa*g/%], more preferably
in the range of from 14000 [MPa*g/%] up to 30000 [MPa*g/%], wherein the Tensile Modulus
in machine direction is measured according to ISO 527-3 at 23°C on 40 µm test blown
films, DDI is the dart-drop impact strength determined according to ASTM D1709, method
A on a 40 µm test blown film and haze is measured according to ASTM D1003 on a 40
µm test blown film.
[0098] The films of the invention can be further characterized by a sealing initiation temperature
determined as described in the experimental part on a blown film with a thickness
of 40 µm of below 100°C, preferably in the range of 60°C to below 100°C, more preferably
in the range of 70°C to 95°C, even more preferably in the range of 75°C to 90°C.
[0099] In another embodiment of the invention the films may have a hot tack temperature
(HTT) of less than 95°C, determined according to ASTM F 1921 - 98 method B on a 40
µm test blown film.
[0100] Preferably, the hot tack temperature (HTT) is in the range of 70°C to 92°C, more
preferably in the range of 75°C to 90°C and even more preferably in the range of 78°C
to 87°C.
[0101] The inventive films are fully recyclable and thus improves sustainability, as it
is in the most preferred embodiment a "100% PE" solution with no other polymer than
ethylene based polymers being present.
[0102] In another embodiment the inventive film contains at least 90 wt% of PE polymers,
more preferably 95 to 99 wt% of PE polymers (difference to 100 wt% can be other polymers
than PE), and is thus also suitable for being recycled.
[0103] The inventive blend of a specific multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density
polyethylene (mLLDPE) and a specific low density polyethylene (LDPE) is furthermore
very beneficial for making films. Benefits can be seen in lower required melt pressure,
which is expected to increase the output of a blown film process.
[0104] The films according to the present invention are highly useful for being used in
various packaging applications, wherein applications related to food packaging are
preferred. Furthermore the films according to the present invention may be used as
a layer in multilayer polyethylene based blown films, preferably as core layer in
multilayer polyethylene based blown films.
[0105] The invention will be further described with reference to the following non-limiting
examples.
Determination methods
[0106] Unless otherwise stated in the description or in the experimental part, the following
methods were used for the property determinations of the polymers (including its fractions
and components) and/or any sample preparations thereof as specified in the text or
experimental part.
Melt Flow Rate
[0107] The melt flow rate (MFR) was determined according to ISO 1133 and is indicated in
g/10 min. The MFR is an indication of the flowability, and hence the processability,
of the polymer. The higher the melt flow rate, the lower the viscosity of the polymer.
The MFR is determined at 190 °C for polyethylene. MFR may be determined at different
loadings such as 2.16 kg (MFR
2), 5 kg (MFR
5) or 21.6 kg (MFR
21).
[0108] Calculation of MFR2 of Component B and of Fraction (A-2)
For Component B:
[0109]
B = MFR2 of Component (A)
C = MFR2 of Component (B)
A = final MFR2 of multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE)
X = weight fraction of Component (A)
For Fraction (A-2):
[0110]
B = MFR2 of 1st fraction (A-1)
C = MFR2 of 2nd fraction (A-2)
A = final MFR2 (mixture) of loop polymer (= Component (A))
X = weight fraction of the 1st fraction (A-1)
Density
[0111] Density of the polymer was measured according to ISO 1183-1
Comonomer contents:
Quantification of microstructure by NMR spectroscopy
[0112] Quantitative nuclear-magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used to quantify the
comonomer content of the polymers.
[0113] Quantitative
13C{
1H} NMR spectra recorded in the molten-state using a Bruker Advance III 500 NMR spectrometer
operating at 500.13 and 125.76 MHz for
1H and
13C respectively. All spectra were recorded using a
13C optimised 7 mm magic-angle spinning (MAS) probehead at 150°C using nitrogen gas
for all pneumatics. Approximately 200 mg of material was packed into a 7 mm outer
diameter zirconia MAS rotor and spun at 4 kHz. This setup was chosen primarily for
the high sensitivity needed for rapid identification and accurate quantification.{klimke06,
parkinson07, castignolles09} Standard single-pulse excitation was employed utilising
the NOE at short recycle delays{pollard04, klimke06} and the RS-HEPT decoupling scheme{fillip05,griffin07}.
A total of 1024 (1k) transients were acquired per spectra. Quantitative
13C{
1H} NMR spectra were processed, integrated and relevant quantitative properties determined
from the integrals. All chemical shifts are internally referenced to the bulk methylene
signal (δ+) at 30.00 ppm.
[0114] The amount of ethylene was quantified using the integral of the methylene (δ+) sites
at 30.00 ppm accounting for the number of reporting sites per monomer:
the presence of isolated comonomer units is corrected for based on the number of
isolated comonomer units present:
where B and H are defined for their respective comonomers. Correction for consecutive
and non-consecutive commoner incorporation, when present, is undertaken in a similar
way. Characteristic signals corresponding to the incorporation of 1-butene were observed
and the comonomer fraction calculated as the fraction of 1-butene in the polymer with
respect to all monomer in the polymer:
[0115] The amount isolated 1-butene incorporated in EEBEE sequences was quantified using
the integral of the
*B2 sites at 38.3 ppm accounting for the number of reporting sites per comonomer:
[0116] The amount consecutively incorporated 1-butene in EEBBEE sequences was quantified
using the integral of the ααB2B2 site at 39.4 ppm accounting for the number of reporting
sites per comonomer:
[0117] The amount non consecutively incorporated 1-butene in EEBEBEE sequences was quantified
using the integral of the ββB2B2 site at 24.7 ppm accounting for the number of reporting
sites per comonomer:
[0118] Due to the overlap of the *B2 and *βB2B2 sites of isolated (EEBEE) and non-consecutivly
incorporated (EEBEBEE) 1-butene respectively the total amount of isolated 1-butene
incorporation is corrected based on the amount of non-consecutive 1-butene present:
[0119] The total 1-butene content was calculated based on the sum of isolated, consecutive
and non consecutively incorporated 1-butene:
[0120] The total mole fraction of 1-butene in the polymer was then calculated as:
[0121] Characteristic signals corresponding to the incorporation of 1-hexene were observed
and the comonomer fraction calculated as the fraction of 1-hexene in the polymer with
respect to all monomer in the polymer:
[0122] The amount isolated 1-hexene incorporated in EEHEE sequences was quantified using
the integral of the
*B4 sites at 39.9 ppm accounting for the number of reporting sites per comonomer:
[0123] The amount consecutively incorporated 1-hexene in EEHHEE sequences was quantified
using the integral of the ααB4B4 site at 40.5 ppm accounting for the number of reporting
sites per comonomer:
[0124] The amount non consecutively incorporated 1-hexene in EEHEHEE sequences was quantified
using the integral of the ββB4B4 site at 24.7 ppm accounting for the number of reporting
sites per comonomer:
[0125] The total mole fraction of 1-hexene in the polymer was then calculated as:
[0126] The mole percent comonomer incorporation is calculated from the mole fraction:
[0127] The weight percent comonomer incorporation is calculated from the mole fraction:
References:
[0128] Klimke, K., Parkinson, M., Piel, C., Kaminsky, W., Spiess, H.W., Wilhelm, M., Macromol.
Chem. Phys. 2006;207:382.
[0129] Parkinson, M., Klimke, K., Spiess, H.W., Wilhelm, M., Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2007;208:2128.
Pollard, M., Klimke, K., Graf, R., Spiess, H.W., Wilhelm, M., Sperber, O., Piel, C.,
Kaminsky, W., Macromolecules 2004;37:813.
[0131] Griffin, J.M., Tripon, C., Samoson, A., Filip, C., and Brown, S.P., Mag. Res. in Chem.
2007 45, S1, S198.
[0132] Castignolles, P., Graf, R., Parkinson, M., Wilhelm, M., Gaborieau, M., Polymer 50
(2009) 2373 Busico, V., Cipullo, R., Prog. Polym. Sci. 26 (2001) 443.
[0133] Busico, V., Cipullo, R., Monaco, G., Vacatello, M., Segre, A.L., Macromoleucles 30
(1997) 6251.
[0134] Zhou, Z., Kuemmerle, R., Qiu, X., Redwine, D., Cong, R., Taha, A., Baugh, D. Winniford,
B., J. Mag. Reson. 187 (2007) 225.
[0135] Busico, V., Carbonniere, P., Cipullo, R., Pellecchia, R., Severn, J., Talarico, G.,
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 1128.
[0136] Resconi, L., Cavallo, L., Fait, A., Piemontesi, F., Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1253.
GPC-VISC-LS analysis for determination of branching factor g'
[0137] A PL 220 (Agilent) GPC equipped with an infra-red detector (IR4 (PolymerChar, Spain),
an online four capillary bridge viscometer (PL-BV 400-HT), and a dual light scattering
detector (PL-LS 15/90 light scattering detector) with a 15° and 90° angle was used.
3x Olexis and 1x Olexis Guard columns from Agilent as stationary phase and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
(TCB, stabilized with 250 mg/L 2,6-Di tert butyl-4-methyl-phenol) as mobile phase
at 160 °C and at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min was applied. 200 µL of sample solution
were injected per analysis. All samples were prepared by dissolving 8.0 - 10.0 mg
of polymer in 10 mL (at 160 °C) of stabilized TCB (same as mobile phase) for 2,5 hours
at 160°C under continuous gentle shaking. The injected concentration of the polymer
solution at 160°C (c
160°C) was determined in the following way.
With: w
25 (polymer weight) and V
25 (Volume of TCB at 25°C).
GPC-VISC-LS processing
[0138] For the GPC light scattering approach (GPC
LS) the inter detector delay volumes were determined with a narrow PS standard (MWD
= 1.01) with a molar mass of 130000 g/mol. The corresponding detector constants for
the light scattering detector and the online viscometer were determined with the broad
standard NIST1475A (Mw = 52000 g/mol and IV=1,01 dl/g). The corresponding used dn/dc
for the used PE standard in TCB was 0,094 cm
3/g. The calculation was performed using the Cirrus Multi-Offline SEC-Software Version
3.2 (Agilent). The molar mass at each elution slice was calculated by using the 15°
light scattering angle. Data collection, data processing and calculation were performed
using the Cirrus Multi SEC-Software Version 3.2. The molecular weight was calculated
using the option in the Cirrus software "use LS 15 angle" in the field
"sample calculation options subfield
slice MW data from". As dn/dc used for the determination of molecular weight a value of 0.094 was used.
Molecular weight averages (Mz(LS), Mw(LS) and Mn(LS)), Molecular weight distribution
(MWD) and its broadness, described by polydispersity, PD(LS)= Mw(LS)/Mn(LS) (wherein
Mn(LS) is the number average molecular weight and Mw(LS) is the weight average molecular
weight obtained from GPC-LS) were calculated by Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
using the following formulas:
[0139] For a constant elution volume interval ΔV
i, where A
i and M
i(LS) are the chromatographic peak slice area and polyolefin molecular weight (MW) determined
by GPC-LS.
Calculation of Branching Index g'85-100
[0140] The relative amount of branching is determined using the g'-index of the branched
polymer sample. The long chain branching (LCB) index is defined as g'= [η]
br/[η]
lin. It is well known if the g' value increases the branching content decreases. [η]
is the intrinsic viscosity at 160 °C in TCB of the polymer sample at a certain molecular
weight and is measured by an online viscosity and a concentration detector, where
[η]
lin is the intrinsic viscosity of the linear polymer having the same chemical compostion.
The intrinsic viscosities were measured as described in the handbook of the Cirrus
Multi-Offline SEC-Software Version 3.2 with use of the Solomon-Gatesman equation.
The [η]
lin at a certain molecular weight was obtained using the Mark Houwink constant:
[0141] The constants K and α are specific for a polymer-solvent system and M is the molecular
weight obtained from LS analysis.
[0142] To encounter for the amount of comonomer content in the polyethylene-co-alpha-olefine
the [K]
LLDPE needs to be modified in the following way:
[0143] Where x is the amount of C atoms in the alpha olefine and K
PE is determined by analysing the linear homo PE (NIST 1475a) using α = 0,725 and the
content of the alpha-olefine is determined by
13C-NMR. Normally K
PE is between 0.00039 and 0.00042.
[0144] An IR detector determines the necessary concentration of each elution slice.
[0145] [η]
lin is the intrinsic viscosity of a linear sample and [η]
br the viscosity of a branched sample of the same molecular weight and chemical composition.
By dividing the intrinsic viscosity of a branched sample [IV
b] with the intrinsic viscosity of a linear polymer [IV
l] at the same molecular weight, the viscosity branching factor g' can be calculated.
[0146] In this case the g'
(85-100) are calculated by adding the product of
in the range where the cumulative fraction is 85% to 100% and dividing it through
the corresponded signal area of the concentration signal, a
i.
Dart drop strength (DDI): Impact resistance by free-falling dart method
[0147] This test method covers the determination of the energy that causes films to fail
under specified conditions of impact of a free-falling dart from a specified height
that would result in failure of 50 % of the specimens tested (ASTM D1709; Alternative
testing technique - method A).
[0148] By this technique, successive groups of twenty specimens each are tested. One missile
weight is employed for each group and missile weight is varied in increments from
group to group.
[0149] Deviating from ASTM D1709-16a the test was performed on several film strips of a
sample with at least 4 different weights. 20 specimens per weight were tested, so
that a break range of 5 % - 95 % was covered. It must be ensured that at least one
weight is determined in the breaking range of 5 % - 25 %, at least two weights in
the breaking range of 30 % - 70 %, and at least one weight in the breaking range of
75 % - 95 %. The selection of the weights can be done in uneven steps. A film strip
was taken across the width of the sample and measured on a thickness measuring device.
Standard conditions:
[0150]
Conditioning time: > 96 h
Test temperature: 23 °C
Dart head material: phenolic
Dart diameter: 38 mm
Drop height: 660 mm
Results:
[0151] Impact failure weight - 50% [g]
Tensile modulus
[0152] Tensile modulus (E-Mod (MPa) was measured in machine and/or transverse direction
according to ISO 527-3 on film samples prepared as described under the Film Sample
preparation with film thickness of 40 µm and at a cross head speed of 1 mm/min for
the modulus.
Haze
[0153] Haze was determined according to ASTM D 1003-00 on films as produced indicated below.
[0154] Hot Tack temperature (lowest temperature to get maximum Hot tack force) and
Hot tack force (maximum Hot tack force) were measured according to ASTM F 1921 method B on a blown
film of 40 µm thickness with below settings:
Q-name instrument: Hot Tack - Sealing Tester
Model: J&B model 4000 MB
Sealbar length: 50 [mm]
Seal bar width: 5 [mm]
Seal bar shape: flat
Seal Pressure: 0.15 N/mm2
Seal Time: 1s
Coating of sealing bars: NIPTEF ®
Roughness of coating sealing bars: 1 [µm]
Film Specimen width: 25 mm
Cool time: 0.2 s
Peel Speed: 200 mm/s
Start temperature: 50 °C
End temperature: burn through and/or shrinking
Increments: 5 °C
[0155] All film test specimens were prepared in standard atmospheres for conditioning and
testing at 23 °C (± 2 °C) and 50 % (± 10 %) relative humidity. The minimum conditioning
time of test specimen in standard atmosphere just before start testing is at least
40 h. The minimum storage time between extrusion of film sample and start testing
is at least 88 h. The hot-tack measurement determines the strength of heat seals formed
in the films, immediately after the seal has been made and before it cools to ambient
temperature.
[0156] The hot-tack force was measured as a function of temperature within the temperature
range and with temperature increments as indicated above. The number of test specimens
were at least 3 specimens per temperature. The Hot-tack force is evaluated as the
highest force (maximum peak value) with failure mode "peel".
[0157] Sealing initiation temperature (SIT); sealing end temperature (SET), sealing range:
The method determines the sealing temperature range (sealing range) of polyethylene
films,
in particular blown films or cast films. The sealing temperature range is the temperature
range,
in which the films can be sealed according to conditions given below.
[0158] The lower limit (heat sealing initiation temperature (SIT)) is the sealing temperature
at which a sealing strength of ≥ 5 N is achieved. The upper limit (sealing end temperature
(SET)) is reached, when the films stick to the sealing device.
[0159] The measurement was done according to the slightly modified ASTM F1921 - 12, where
the test parameters sealing pressure, cooling time and test speed have been modified.
The determination of the force/temperature curve was continued until thermal failure
of the film.
[0160] The sealing range was determined on a J&B Universal Sealing Machine Type 4000 with
a blown film of 40 µm thickness with the following further parameters:
Conditioning time: > 96 h
Specimen width: 25 mm
Sealing pressure: 0.4 N/mm2 (PE)
Sealing time: 1 sec
Delay time: 30 sec
Sealing jaws dimension: 50x5 mm
Sealing jaws shape: flat
Sealing jaws coating: Niptef
Sealing temperature: ambient - 240°C
Sealing temperature interval: 5°C
Start temperature: 50°C
Grip separation rate: 42 mm/sec
Film sample preparation
[0161] The test films consisting of the inventive blend and respective comparative films
of 40 µm thickness, were prepared using a Collin 30 lab scale mono layer blown film
line.The film samples were produced at 194°C, a 1:2.5 blow-up ratio, frostline distance
of 120 mm.
[0162] The compounding for the blends for IE1 and CE2 was done on a co-rotating TSE16 twin
screw extruder with melt temperature of 200°C. The blends further contained 0.2 wt%
of Irganox B215 (BASF) and 0.1 wt% of calcium stearate (Bäerlocher) as acid scavenger
(AS).
[0163] The blend for CE2 was prepared directly in the line.
Examples:
Materials used:
[0164]
mLLDPE:
For Comparative Example CE2 as mLLDPE: Anteo™ FK1820: bimodal ethylene/1-butene/1-hexene terpolymer with a density of 918 kg/m3, MFR2 (190°C/2.16kg) of 1.5 g/10min, MFR21/MFR2 = 19.1, g' = 1.00 produced with a metallocene catalyst; commercially available from
Borouge. It contains antioxidant and processing aid.
LDPEs:
FT5230: LDPE commercial available from Borealis density is 923 kg/m3 and MFR2 0.75 g/10min.
CA9150: LDPE commercial available from Borealis, density is 915 kg/m3 and MFR2 15 g/10min
Cat.Example: Catalyst preparation (CAT1 - for inventive Examples)
Loading of SiO2:
[0165] 10 kg of silica (PQ Corporation ES757, calcined 600°C) was added from a feeding drum
and inertized in the reactor until O
2 level below 2 ppm was reached.
Preparation of MAO/tol/MC:
[0166] 30 wt% MAO in toluene (14.1 kg) was added into another reactor from a balance followed
by toluene (4.0 kg) at 25°C (oil circulation temp) and stirring 95 rpm. Stirring speed
was increased 95 rpm -> 200 rpm after toluene addition, stirring time 30 min. Metallocene
Rac-dimethylsilanediylbis{2-(5-(trimethylsilyl)furan-2-yl)-4,5-dimethylcyclopentadien-1-yl}zirconium
dichloride 477 g was added from a metal cylinder followed by flushing with 4 kg toluene
(total toluene amount 8.0 kg). Reactor stirring speed was changed to 95 rpm for MC
feeding and returned back to 200 rpm for 3 h reaction time. After reaction time MAO/tol/MC
solution was transferred into a feeding vessel.
Preparation of catalyst:
[0167] Reactor temperature was set to 10°C (oil circulation temp) and stirring was turned
to 40 rpm during the MAO/tol/MC addition. MAO/tol/MC solution (22.2 kg) was added
within 205 min followed by 60 min stirring time (oil circulation temp was set to 25°C).
After stirring "dry mixture" was stabilised for 12 h at 25°C (oil circulation temp),
stirring 0 rpm. Reactor was turned 20° (back and forth) and stirring was turned on
5 rpm for few rounds once an hour.
[0168] After stabilisation the catalyst was dried at 60°C (oil circulation temp) for 2 h
under nitrogen flow 2 kg/h, followed by 13 h under vacuum (same nitrogen flow with
stirring 5 rpm). Dried catalyst was sampled and HC content was measured in the glove
box with Sartorius Moisture Analyser, (Model MA45) using thermogravimetric method.
Target HC level was < 2% (actual 1.3 %).
Polymerization:
[0169] Borstar pilot plant with a 3-reactor set-up (loop1 - loop2 - GPR 1) and a prepolymerization
loop reactor.
[0170] mLLDPE was produced by using the polymerization conditions as given in Table 1.
Table 2: Material properties of mLLDPE
Material |
mLLDPE-1 |
MFR2 (g/10 min) (final) |
1.5 |
MFR21 (g/10 min) |
44.1 |
MFR21/MFR2 |
27.6 |
Density (kg/m3) |
918 |
C4 (wt%) |
1.5 |
C6 (wt%) |
7.5 |
g'85-100 |
0.94 |
Monolayer blown films
[0171] The above produced mLLDPE, as well as FK1820 were blended with the LDPE.
[0172] The following films have been produced with the above described method (film sample
preparation).
[0173] The data demonstrates that using the specific mLLDPE blended with specific LDPEs
leads to an excellent combination of good processability, good DDI and good optics.
[0174] By comparing IE1 with CE1 it can be seen that the choice of the LDPE (especially
in view of the MFR ratio of LDPE/mLLDPE) has an influence on the processability. The
melt pressure needed in IE1 is more than 10 bar less than for CE1. Also the overall
performance (OMA) is increased for IE1 compared to CE1.
[0175] By comparing IE1 and CE2 it can be seen that the specific design of the mLLDPE provides
blends with clearly improved DDI and clearly increased overall performance (OMA).
1. A polyethylene blend comprising
a) 51.0 wt% to 95.0 wt%, based on the total weight of the polyethylene blend, of a
multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) which consists
of
(i) 30.0 to 70.0 wt% of an ethylene-1-butene polymer component (A), and
(ii) 70.0 to 30.0 wt% of an ethylene-1-hexene polymer component (B),
whereby the ethylene-1-butene polymer component (A) has
a density in the range of 920 to 950 kg/m3,
a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 2.0 to 400.0 g/10 min,
a 1-butene content in the range of 1.5 to 8.0 wt%, based on the ethylene-1-butene
polymer component (A) and
the ethylene polymer component (B) has
a density in the range of 895 to 918 kg/m3,
a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 0.01 to 1.5 g/10 min
a 1-hexene content in the range of 8.0 to 25.0 wt% based on the ethylene-1-hexene
polymer compound (B),
whereby the multimodal metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE)
has a density in the range of 905 to 940 kg/m3,
a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 0.3 to 5.0 g/10 min and
a ratio of the MFR21 (190°C, 21.6 kg, ISO 1133) to MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133), MFR21/MFR2, in the range of 20 to 50;
a branching index g'85-100 (determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) as described in the experimental
part) of < 1.00 and
b) 1.0 to 49.0 wt%, based on the total weight of the polyethylene blend, of a low
density polyethylene (LDPE) whereby said LDPE has
a density in the range of 910 to 940 kg/m3; and
a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 1.5 to 20.0 g/10 min,
whereby the ratio of the MFR2 of the LDPE to the MFR2 of the mLLDPE is > 1.0.
2. The polyethylene blend according to claim 1, wherein in the multimodal metallocene
catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) the ethylene-1-butene polymer component
(A) consists of an ethylene polymer fraction (A-1) and an ethylene polymer fraction
(A-2),
wherein the ethylene polymer fraction (A-1) has
a density in the range of 920 to 950 kg/m3, preferably of 922 to 945 kg/m3, more preferably of 925 to 940 kg/m3 and/or
a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 1.0 to 800.0 g/10 min, preferably of 1.5
to 400.0 g/10 min, more preferably of 2.0 to 200.0 g/10 min and even more preferably
of 2.5 to 50.0 g/10 min, and/or
the ethylene polymer fraction (A-2) has
a density in the range of from 920 to 950 kg/m3, preferably of 925 to 945 kg/m3 and /or a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 1.5 to 400.0 g/10 min, preferably of 2.0
to 200.0 g/10 min, more preferably of 2.5 to 40.0 g/10 min and most preferably of
3.0 to 10.0 g/10 min.
3. The polyethylene blend according to claim 1 or 2, wherein in the multimodal metallocene
catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE)
- the ethylene polymer component (A) has a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) of 2.5 to 300 g/10 min, preferably of 3.0 to 200 g/10
min, more preferably of 3.2 to 100 g/10 min, still more preferably of 3.5 to 20 g/10
min and/or
- the ethylene polymer component (B) preferably has a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) of 0.05 to 1.5 g/10 min, more preferably of 0.1 to 1.2
g/10 min and even more preferably of 0.2 to 1.0 g/10 min.
4. The polyethylene blend according to any of the preceding claims, wherein in the multimodal
metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) the ratio of the MFR21 (190°C, 21.6 kg, ISO 1133) to MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133), MFR21/MFR2 is in the range of from 22 to 40 and preferably from 24 to 35.
5. The polyethylene blend according to any of the preceding claims, wherein in the multimodal
metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) the total amount of
1-butene, based on metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE),
is in the range of from 0.6 to 3.0 wt%, preferably 0.8 to 2.5 wt% and more preferably
1.0 to 2.0 wt% and
the total amount of 1-hexene, based on the metallocene catalysed linear low density
polyethylene (mLLDPE) is in the range of 2.0 to 20.0 wt%, preferably 4.0 to 18.0 wt%,
more preferably 5.0 to 15.0 wt% and still more preferably 5.0 to 10.0 wt%.
6. The polyethylene blend according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the multimodal
metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) has a branching index
g'85-100 (determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) as described in the experimental
part) in the range of 0.80 to 0.98, preferably 0.85 to 0.96.
7. The polyethylene blend according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the multimodal
metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) is produced in the
presence of metallocene complex of formula (I):
wherein each X is independently a halogen atom, a C1-6-alkyl group, C1-6-alkoxy group, phenyl or benzyl group;
each Het is independently a monocyclic heteroaromatic group containing at least one
heteroatom selected from O or S;
L is -R'2Si-, wherein each R' is independently C1-20-hydrocarbyl or C1-10-alkyl substituted with alkoxy having 1 to 10 carbon atoms;
M is Ti, Zr or Hf;
each R1 is the same or different and is a C1-6-alkyl group or C1-6-alkoxy group;
each n is 1 to 2;
each R2 is the same or different and is a C1-6-alkyl group, C1-6-alkoxy group or -Si(R)3 group; each R is C1-10-alkyl or phenyl group optionally substituted by 1 to 3 C1-6-alkyl groups; and each p is 0 to 1.
8. The polyethylene blend according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the LDPE
has a MFR2 (190°C, 2.16 kg, ISO 1133) in the range of 5.0 to 18.0 g/10 min, preferably in the
range of 8.0 to 17.0 g/10 min, more preferably in the range of 10.0 to 16.0 g/10min
and/or
a density in the range of 912 to 935 kg/m3, preferably in the range of 913 to 930 kg/m3 and more preferably in the range of 914 to 925 kg/m3.
9. The polyethylene blend according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the blend
consists of
a) 65.0 wt% to 98.0 wt%, preferably 75.0 wt% to 96.0 wt%, more preferably 80.0 wt%
to 92.0 wt%, based on the total weight of the polyethylene blend, of the multimodal
metallocene catalysed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) and
b) 2.0 to 35.0 wt%, preferably 4.0 wt% to 25.0 wt%, more preferably 8.0 wt% to 20.0
wt%, based on the total weight of the polyethylene blend, of the low density polyethylene
(LDPE), thus the total amounts of a) + b) summing up to 100 wt%.
10. The polyethylene blend according to any of the preceding claims, wherein in the blend
the ratio of the MFR2 of the LDPE to the MFR2 of the mLLDPE is in the range of > 1.0 up to 50.0, preferably 2.0 to 40.0, more preferably
5.0 to 30.0 and even more preferably 6.0 to 20.0
11. Use of the polyethylene blend according to any of the preceding claims for the preparation
of a monolayer blown film.
12. A monolayer blown film, comprising a polyethylene blend according to any of the preceding
claims 1 to 10, wherein the film is
characterized by having
a) a dart-drop impact strength (DDI) determined according to ASTM D1709, method A
on a 40 µm monolayer test blown film of at least 550 g up to 1500 g, preferably 600
g up to 1400 g and more preferably 700 g up to 1200 g and/or
b) a haze (measured on a 40 µm monolayer test blown film according to ASTM D 1003-00)
of below 15 %, preferably between 2 % and 12 %, more preferably between 4 % and 10
%.
13. The monolayer blown film according to claim 12, wherein the film furthermore has c)
an optomechanical ability (OMA) according to formula (II):
determined on a 40 µm test blown film of at least 12000 [MPa*g/%] up to 50000 [MPa*g/%],
preferably in the range of from 13000 [MPa*g/%] up to 40000 [MPa*g/%], more preferably
in the range of from 14000 [MPa*g/%] up to 30000 [MPa*g/%], wherein the Tensile Modulus
in machine direction is measured according to ISO 527-3 at 23°C on 40 µm test blown
films , DDI is the dart-drop impact strength determined according to ASTM D1709, method
A on a 40 µm test blown film and haze is measured according to ASTM D1003 on a 40
µm test blown film.
14. Use of the film according to any of the preceding claims 12 to 13 as packing material,
in particular as a packing material for food.
15. Use of the film according to any of the preceding claims 12 to 13 as a layer in multilayer
polyethylene based blown films, preferably as core layer in multilayer polyethylene
based blown films.