TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The invention relates to systems and methods for treating or upgrading heavy oil
feeds, and crude products produced using such systems and methods.
BACKGROUND
[0002] The petroleum industry is increasingly turning to heavy oil feeds such as heavy crudes,
resids, coals, tar sands, etc. as sources for feedstocks. These feedstocks are characterized
by high concentrations of asphaltenes rich residues, and low API gravities, with some
being as low as less than 0° API.
[0003] PCT Patent Publication No. WO2008/014947,
US Patent Publication No. 2008/0083650,
US Patent Publication No. 2005/0241993,
US Patent Publication No. 2007/0138057, and
US Patent No. 6,660,157 describe processes, systems, and catalysts for processing heavy oil feeds. Heavy
oil feedstock typically contains large levels of heavy metals. Some of the heavy metals
such as nickel and vanadium tend to react quickly, leading to deposition or trapping
of vanadium-rich solids in equipment such as reactors. The solid deposition reduces
available volume for reaction, cutting down on run time.
[0004] US 2007/138056 A1 discloses a residuum full hydro-conversion slurry reactor system that allows the
catalyst, unconverted oil, hydrogen and converted oil to circulate in a continuous
mixture through the entire reactor with no confinement of the mixture.
[0005] There is still a need for improved systems and methods to upgrade / treat process
heavy oil feeds with reduced build-ups of heavy metals in process equipment.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] The essential technical features of the invention are explicitly defined in the wording
of independent process claim 1 on file.
[0007] In one aspect, this invention relates to a process for by which a heavy oil feedstock
can be upgraded. The process employs a plurality of contacting zones, separation zones
and at least an interstage solvent deasphalting unit (SDA). The process comprises:
a) combining a hydrogen containing gas feed, a heavy oil feedstock, and a slurry catalyst
in a first contacting zone under hydrocracking conditions to convert at least a portion
of the heavy oil feedstock to upgraded products; c) sending a mixture of the upgraded
products, the slurry catalyst, the hydrogen containing gas, and unconverted heavy
oil feedstock to a separation zone; d) in the separation zone, removing the upgraded
products with the hydrogen containing gas as an overhead stream, and removing the
slurry catalyst and the unconverted heavy oil feedstock as a non-volatile stream;
e) sending at least a portion of the non-volatile stream to the SDA unit to separate
the asphaltenes and slurry catalyst from the deasphalted oil; f) sending the deasphalted
oil and the rest of the non-volatile stream from the previous separation zone to another
contacting zone, under hydrocracking conditions with additional hydrogen gas and additional
slurry catalyst, to convert the deasphalted oil to upgraded products; f) sending the
upgraded products, the slurry catalyst, hydrogen, and unconverted deasphalted oil
to a separation zone, whereby the upgraded products are removed with hydrogen as an
overhead stream and the slurry catalyst and the unconverted deasphalted oil are removed
as a non-volatile stream; and g) recycling to at least one of the contacting zones
at least a portion of the non-volatile stream containing the slurry catalyst and the
unconverted deasphalted oil.
[0008] In another aspect, there is provided a process employing a plurality of contacting
zones, separation zones and at least an interstage solvent deasphalting unit (SDA)
in which a heavy oil feedstock can be upgraded, and wherein at least a portion of
the non-volatile stream from at least a contacting zone is sent to the SDA unit to
separate the asphaltenes from the deasphalted oil.
[0009] In one aspect, this invention relates to a process for by which a heavy oil feedstock
can be upgraded with reduced heavy metal deposits in the front-end contacting zones.
The process employ a plurality of contacting zones and separation zones, the process
comprising: a) combining a hydrogen containing gas feed, a heavy oil feedstock, and
a slurry catalyst in a first contacting zone under hydrocracking conditions to convert
at least a portion of the heavy oil feedstock to upgraded products, wherein water
and / or steam being injected into first contacting zone in an amount of 1 to 25 weight
% on the weight of the heavy oil feedstock; b) sending a mixture of the upgraded products,
the slurry catalyst, the hydrogen containing gas, and unconverted heavy oil feedstock
to a separation zone; c) in the separation zone, removing the upgraded products with
the hydrogen containing gas as an overhead stream, and removing the slurry catalyst
and the unconverted heavy oil feedstock as a non-volatile stream; d) sending the non-volatile
stream to another contacting zone under hydrocracking conditions with additional hydrogen
gas, unconverted heavy oil feedstock, and optionally, a fresh slurry catalyst to convert
the unconverted heavy oil feedstock to upgraded products; f) sending the upgraded
products, the slurry catalyst, hydrogen, and unconverted heavy oil feedstock to a
separation zone, whereby the upgraded products are removed with hydrogen as an overhead
stream and the slurry catalyst and the unconverted heavy oil feedstock are removed
as a non-volatile stream; and g) recycling to at least one of the contacting zones
at least a portion of the non-volatile stream.
[0010] In another aspect, the invention relates to a method for upgrading a heavy oil feedstock
employing a plurality of contacting zones and separation zones, in which water and
/ or steam is injected into the first contacting zone, and wherein at least a portion
of the non-volatile stream from a separation zone other than the first separation
zone is recycled to the first contacting zone, wherein the recycled stream ranges
between 35 to 50 wt. % of the total heavy oil feedstock to the process.
[0011] In one aspect, this invention relates to a process for by which a heavy oil feedstock
can be upgraded. The process employs a plurality of contacting zones and separation
zones, the process comprising: a) a heavy oil feedstock with at least a portion of
the heavy oil feedstock is fed to a contacting zone other than the first contacting
zone; b) combining a hydrogen containing gas feed, a portion of the heavy oil feedstock,
and a slurry catalyst in a first contacting zone under hydrocracking conditions to
convert at least a portion of the heavy oil feedstock to upgraded products; c) sending
a mixture of the upgraded products, the slurry catalyst, the hydrogen containing gas,
and unconverted heavy oil feedstock to a separation zone; d) in the separation zone,
removing the upgraded products with the hydrogen containing gas as an overhead stream,
and removing the slurry catalyst and the unconverted heavy oil feedstock as a non-volatile
stream; e) sending the non-volatile stream to another contacting zone under hydrocracking
conditions with additional hydrogen gas, at least a portion of the heavy oil feedstock,
and optionally, fresh slurry catalyst to convert the unconverted heavy oil feedstock
to upgraded products; f) sending the upgraded products, the slurry catalyst, hydrogen,
and unconverted heavy oil feedstock to a separation zone, whereby the upgraded products
are removed with hydrogen as an overhead stream and the slurry catalyst and the unconverted
heavy oil feedstock are removed as a non-volatile stream; and g) recycling to the
first contacting zone at least a portion of the non-volatile stream.
[0012] In another aspect, the process employs a plurality of contacting zones and separation
zones, the process comprising: a) providing a slurry catalyst containing a used slurry
catalyst and optionally a fresh catalyst slurry feed; b) combining a hydrogen containing
gas feed, the heavy oil feedstock, and the slurry catalyst in a contacting zone under
hydrocracking conditions to convert at least a portion of the heavy oil feedstock
to upgraded products; c) sending a mixture comprising the upgraded products, the slurry
catalyst, the hydrogen containing gas, and unconverted heavy oil feedstock to a separation
zone; d) in the separation zone, removing the upgraded products with the hydrogen
containing gas as an overhead stream, and removing the slurry catalyst and the unconverted
heavy oil feedstock as a non-volatile stream; e) sending the non-volatile stream to
another contacting zone under hydrocracking conditions with additional hydrogen gas
and a fresh slurry catalyst to convert the unconverted heavy oil feedstock to upgraded
products; f) sending the upgraded products, the slurry catalyst, hydrogen, and unconverted
heavy oil feedstock to a separation zone, whereby the upgraded products are removed
with hydrogen as an overhead stream and the slurry catalyst and the unconverted heavy
oil feedstock are removed as a non-volatile stream; and g) recycling to the first
contacting zone at least a portion of the non-volatile stream.
[0013] In yet another aspect, there is provided a process employing a plurality of contacting
zones and separation zones in which a heavy oil feedstock can be upgraded, and wherein
the fresh slurry catalyst is split between the contacting zones.
[0014] In one aspect, the process employs a plurality of contacting zones and separation
zones, the process comprising: a) combining a hydrogen containing gas feed, a heavy
oil feedstock, and a slurry catalyst in a first contacting zone under hydrocracking
conditions to convert at least a portion of the heavy oil feedstock to upgraded products;
b) sending a mixture of the upgraded products, the slurry catalyst, the hydrogen containing
gas, and unconverted heavy oil feedstock to a separation zone; c) in the separation
zone, removing the upgraded products with the hydrogen containing gas as an overhead
stream, and removing the slurry catalyst and the unconverted heavy oil feedstock as
a non-volatile stream; d) sending the non-volatile stream to another contacting zone
under hydrocracking conditions with additional hydrogen gas, unconverted heavy oil
feedstock, and optionally, a fresh slurry catalyst to convert the unconverted heavy
oil feedstock to upgraded products; f) sending the upgraded products, the slurry catalyst,
hydrogen, and unconverted heavy oil feedstock to a separation zone, whereby the upgraded
products are removed with hydrogen as an overhead stream and the slurry catalyst and
the unconverted heavy oil feedstock are removed as a non-volatile stream; and and
wherein the first contacting zone operates at a temperature of at least at least 10°F
(5.65°C) lower than the next contacting zone in series.
[0015] In yet another aspect, the invention relates to a process for by which a heavy oil
feedstock can be upgraded with reduced heavy metal deposits in the front-end contacting
zones. The process employ a plurality of contacting zones and separation zones, comprising:
a) combining a hydrogen containing gas feed, a heavy oil feedstock, and a slurry catalyst
in a first contacting zone under hydrocracking conditions to convert at least a portion
of the heavy oil feedstock to upgraded products; b) sending a mixture of the upgraded
products, the slurry catalyst, the hydrogen containing gas, and unconverted heavy
oil feedstock to a separation zone; c) in the separation zone, removing the upgraded
products with the hydrogen containing gas as an overhead stream, and removing the
slurry catalyst and the unconverted heavy oil feedstock as a non-volatile stream;
d) sending the non-volatile stream to another contacting zone under hydrocracking
conditions with additional hydrogen gas, unconverted heavy oil feedstock, and optionally,
a fresh slurry catalyst to convert the unconverted heavy oil feedstock to upgraded
products; f) sending the upgraded products, the slurry catalyst, hydrogen, and unconverted
heavy oil feedstock to a separation zone, wherein the upgraded products are removed
with hydrogen as an overhead stream and the slurry catalyst and the unconverted heavy
oil feedstock are removed as a non-volatile stream; and wherein the slurry catalyst
to the first separation zone comprises at least a portion of a non-volatile stream
from one of the separation zones as a recycled catalyst stream, and wherein the recycled
catalyst stream is between 35 to 50 wt. % of the heavy oil feedstock
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016]
Figure 1 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates an embodiment of a hydroprocessing
system for upgrading a heavy oil feedstock, with a plurality of contacting zones and
separation zones, wherein water and or steam is injected into the front end contacting
zone.
Figure 2 is a flow diagram of a process to upgrade heavy oil feeds with water injection.
Figure 3 is a flow diagram of a process to upgrade heavy oil feeds with steam injection
directly into a front end contacting zone.
Figure 4 is a flow diagram of another embodiment of process to upgrade heavy oil feeds
with a recycled catalyst stream at a sufficient rate to reduce heavy metal build-up.
Figure 5 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates an embodiment of a hydroprocessing
system for upgrading a heavy oil feedstock, having a split fresh catalyst feed scheme,
a split heavy oil feed scheme, and additional interstage hydrocarbon oil feedstock.
Figure 6 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates another embodiment of a
hydroprocessing system for upgrading a heavy oil feedstock with a solvent deasphalting
unit for pre-treating the heavy oil feedstock.
Figure 7 is a flow diagram of a process to upgrade heavy oil feeds with an embodiment
of the catalyst split feed scheme, wherein fresh catalyst feed is fed into all reactors
in the process.
Figure 8 is a flow diagram of a process to upgrade heavy oil feeds wherein the fresh
catalyst feed is diverted from the first reactor to other reactors in the process,
and wherein optional / additional hydrocarbon oil is fed to the reactors as feedstock.
Figure 9 is a flow diagram of another embodiment of a process to upgrade heavy oil
feeds, wherein all of the fresh catalyst feed is sent to the last reactor in the process.
Figure 10 is a flow diagram of another embodiment of a process to upgrade heavy oil
feeds, wherein some of the untreated heavy oil feed is diverted from the first reactor
sent to other reactors in the process.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017] The following terms will be used throughout the specification and will have the following
meanings unless otherwise indicated.
[0018] As used herein, "heavy oil" feed or feedstock refers to heavy and ultra-heavy crudes,
including but not limited to resids, coals, bitumen, shale oils, tar sands, etc. Heavy
oil feedstock may be liquid, semi-solid, and / or solid. Examples of heavy oil feedstock
that might be upgraded as described herein include but are not limited to Canada Tar
sands, vacuum resid from Brazilian Santos and Campos basins, Egyptian Gulf of Suez,
Chad, Venezuelan Zulia, Malaysia, and Indonesia Sumatra. Other examples of heavy oil
feedstock include bottom of the barrel and residuum left over from refinery processes,
including "bottom of the barrel" and "residuum" (or "resid") -- atmospheric tower
bottoms, which have a boiling point of at least 343°C. (650°F.), or vacuum tower bottoms,
which have a boiling point of at least 524°C. (975°F.), or "resid pitch" and "vacuum
residue" - which have a boiling point of 524°C. (975°F.) or greater.
[0019] Properties of heavy oil feedstock may include, but are not limited to: TAN of at
least 0.1, at least 0.3, or at least 1; viscosity of at least 10 cSt; API gravity
at most 15 in one embodiment, and at most 10 in another embodiment. A gram of heavy
oil feedstock typically contains at least 0.0001 grams of Ni/V/Fe; at least 0.005
grams of heteroatoms; at least 0.01 grams of residue; at least 0.04 grams C5 asphaltenes;
at least 0.002 grams of MCR; per gram of crude; at least 0.00001 grams of alkali metal
salts of one or more organic acids; and at least 0.005 grams of sulfur. In one embodiment,
the heavy oil feedstock has a sulfur content of at least 5 wt. % and an API gravity
of from -6 to +6.
[0020] The terms "treatment," "treated," "upgrade", "upgrading" and "upgraded", when used
in conjunction with a heavy oil feedstock, describes a heavy oil feedstock that is
being or has been subjected to hydroprocessing, or a resulting material or crude product,
having a reduction in the molecular weight of the heavy oil feedstock, a reduction
in the boiling point range of the heavy oil feedstock, a reduction in the concentration
of asphaltenes, a reduction in the concentration of hydrocarbon free radicals, and/or
a reduction in the quantity of impurities, such as sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, halides,
and metals.
[0021] The upgrade or treatment of heavy oil feeds is generally referred herein as "hydroprocessing".
Hydroprocessing is meant as any process that is carried out in the presence of hydrogen,
including, but not limited to, hydroconversion, hydrocracking, hydrogenation, hydrotreating,
hydrodesulfurization, hydrodenitrogenation, hydrodemetallation, hydrodearomatization,
hydroisomerization, hydrodewaxing and hydrocracking including selective hydrocracking.
The products of hydroprocessing may show improved viscosities, viscosity indices,
saturates content, low temperature properties, volatilities and depolarization, etc.
[0022] As used herein, hydrogen refers to hydrogen, and / or a compound or compounds that
when in the presence of a heavy oil feed and a catalyst react to provide hydrogen.
[0023] SCF / BBL (or scf / bbl) refers to a unit of standard cubic foot of gas (N
2, H
2, etc.) per barrel of hydrocarbon feed.
[0024] Nm
3/m
3 refers to normal cubic meters of gas per cubic meter of heavy oil feed.
[0025] VGO or vacuum gas oil, referring to hydrocarbons with a boiling range distribution
between 343°C (650°F) and 538°C (1000°F) at 0.101 MPa.
[0026] "wppm" means weight parts per million.
[0027] As used herein, the term "catalyst precursor" refers to a compound containing one
or more catalytically active metals, from which compound a catalyst is eventually
formed. It should be noted that a catalyst precursor may be catalytically active as
a hydroprocessing catalyst. As used herein, "catalyst precursor" may be referred herein
as "catalyst" when used in the context of a catalyst feed.
[0028] As used herein, the term "used catalyst" refers to a catalyst that has been used
in at least a reactor in a hydroprocessing operation and whose activity has thereby
been diminished. For example, if a reaction rate constant of a fresh catalyst at a
specific temperature is assumed to be 100%, the reaction rate constant for a used
catalyst is 95% or less in one embodiment, 80% or less in another embodiment, and
70% or less in a third embodiment. The term "used catalyst" may be used interchangeably
with "recycled catalyst," "used slurry catalyst" or "recycled slurry catalyst."
[0029] As used herein, the term "fresh catalyst" refers to a catalyst or a catalyst precursor
that has not been used in a reactor in a hydroprocessing operation. The term fresh
catalyst herein also includes "re-generated" or "rehabilitated" catalysts, i.e., catalyst
that has been used in at least a reactor in a hydroprocessing operation ("used catalyst")
but its catalytic activity has been restored or at least increased to a level well
above the used catalytic activity level. The term "fresh catalyst" may be used interchangeably
with "fresh slurry catalyst."
[0030] As used herein, the term "slurry catalyst" (or sometimes referred to as "slurry",
or "dispersed catalyst") refers to a liquid medium, e.g., oil, water, or mixtures
thereof, in which catalyst and / or catalyst precursor particles (particulates or
crystallites) having very small average dimensions are dispersed within.
[0031] As used herein, the "catalyst feed" includes any catalyst suitable for upgrading
heavy oil feed stocks, e.g., one or more bulk catalysts and / or one or more catalysts
on a support. The catalyst feed may include at least a fresh catalyst, a used catalyst
only, or mixtures of at least a fresh catalyst and a used catalyst. In one embodiment,
the catalyst feed is in the form of a slurry catalyst.
[0032] As used herein, the term "bulk catalyst" may be used interchangeably with "unsupported
catalyst," meaning that the catalyst composition is NOT of the conventional catalyst
form which has, i.e., having a preformed, shaped catalyst support which is then loaded
with metals via impregnation or deposition catalyst. In one embodiment, the bulk catalyst
is formed through precipitation. In another embodiment, the bulk catalyst has a binder
incorporated into the catalyst composition. In yet another embodiment, the bulk catalyst
is formed from metal compounds and without any binder. In a fourth embodiment, the
bulk catalyst is a dispersing-type catalyst for use as dispersed catalyst particles
in mixture of liquid (e.g., hydrocarbon oil). In one embodiment, the catalyst comprises
one or more commercially known catalysts, e.g., Microcat
™ from ExxonMobil Corp.
[0033] As used herein, the term "contacting zone" refers to an equipment in which the heavy
oil feed is treated or upgraded by contact with a slurry catalyst feed in the presence
of hydrogen. In a contacting zone, at least a property of the crude feed may be changed
or upgraded. The contacting zone can be a reactor, a portion of a reactor, multiple
portions of a reactor, or combinations thereof. The term "contacting zone" may be
used interchangeably with "reacting zone."
[0034] As used herein, the term "separation zone" refers to an equipment in which upgraded
heavy oil feed from a contacting zone is either fed directly into, or subjected to
one or more intermediate processes and then fed directly into the separation zone,
e.g., a flash drum or a high pressure separator, wherein gases and volatile liquids
are separated from the non-volatile fraction. In one embodiment, the non-volatile
fraction stream comprises unconverted heavy oil feed, a small amount of heavier hydrocracked
liquid products (synthetic or less-volatile / non-volatile upgraded products), the
slurry catalyst and any entrained solids (asphaltenes, coke, etc.).
[0035] As used herein, the term "bleed stream" or "bleed off stream" refers to a stream
containing used (or recycled) catalyst, being "bled" or diverted from the hydroprocessing
system, helping to prevent or "flush" accumulating metallic sulfides and other unwanted
impurities from the upgrade system.
[0036] The present invention relates to an improved system to treat or upgrade heavy oil
feeds, particularly heavy oil feedstock having high levels of heavy metals.
[0037] In a typical prior art hydroprocessing system having a plurality of contacting zones
(reactors) in series, it is observed that the feed stream to the 2
nd contacting zone should generally be cleaner than heavy oil feed into the first contacting
zone in the system, i.e., having less impurities such as nickel, vanadium, nitrogen,
sulfur, etc., as the heavy oil has gone through a treatment process in the first contacting
zone. It is also observed that the feed stream into the last contacting zone in the
system should generally be cleaner than the feed stream to the prior contacting zone(s)
in the system.
[0038] In a typical hydroprocessing system, it has been further observed that in the catalyst
feed scheme of the prior art, the feed streams to the subsequent contacting zones
in the system are typically more concentrated in terms of certain impurities, e.g.,
MCR, C
5 and C
7 asphaltenes contents, etc., thus promoting coke formation in the latter contacting
zones in the system.
[0039] It has also been observed that the feed stream to subsequent contacting zones in
the system has properties different than the properties of the heavy oil feed to the
preceding contacting zone(s) in the system, including: a) lower TAN; b) viscosity;
c) lower residue content; d) lower API gravity; e) lower content of metals in metal
salts of organic acids; and g) combinations thereof. However, it has also been observed
that it is generally more difficult to process the feed to the subsequent contacting
zones in the system in terms of the conversion rate and / or the properties of the
resulting crude product. Additionally with the prior art feeding scheme (fresh catalyst
going to the 1
st contacting zone), it is observed that there is more coke formation in the subsequent
contacting zones than in the 1
st contacting zone. It is speculated that the coke formation perhaps has something to
do with the more-difficult-to-process feed to the subsequent contacting zones and
/ or the reduced activity of the catalyst feed to the subsequent contacting zones.
[0040] In one embodiment, the upgrade process comprises a plurality of reactors for contacting
zones, with the reactors being the same or different in configurations. Examples of
reactors that can be used herein include stacked bed reactors, fixed bed reactors,
ebullating bed reactors, continuous stirred tank reactors, fluidized bed reactors,
spray reactors, liquid / liquid contactors, slurry reactors, liquid recirculation
reactors, and combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the reactor is an up-flow reactor.
In another embodiment, a down-flow reactor. In one embodiment, the contacting zone
refers to at least a slurry-bed hydrocracking reactor in series with at least a fixed
bed hydrotreating reactor. In another embodiment, at least one of the contacting zones
further comprises an in-line hydrotreater, capable of removing removed over 70% of
the sulfur, over 90% of nitrogen, and over 90% of the heteroatoms in the crude product
being processed.
[0041] In one embodiment, the contacting zone comprises a plurality of reactors in series,
providing a total residence time ranging from 0.1 to 15 hours. In a second embodiment,
the resident time ranges from 0.5 to 5 hrs. In a third embodiment, the total residence
time in the contacting zone ranges from 0.2 to 2 hours.
[0042] Depending on the conditions and location of the separation zone, in one embodiment,
the amount of heavier hydrocracked products in the non-volatile fraction stream is
less than 50 wt. % (of the total weight of the non-volatile stream). In a second embodiment,
the amount of heavier hydrocracked products in the non-volatile stream from the separation
zone is less than 25 wt. %. In a third embodiment, the amount of heavier hydrocracked
products in the non-volatile stream from the separation zone is less than 15 wt. %.
It should be noted that at least a portion of the slurry catalyst remains with the
upgraded feedstock as the upgraded materials is withdrawn from the contacting zone
and fed into the separation zone, and the slurry catalyst continues to be available
in the separation zone and exits the separation zone with the non-volatile liquid
fraction.
[0043] In one embodiment, both the contacting zone and the separation zone are combined
into one equipment, e.g., a reactor having an internal separator, or a multi-stage
reactor-separator. In this type of reactor-separator configuration, the vapor product
exits the top of the equipment, and the non-volatile fractions exit the side or bottom
of the equipment with the slurry catalyst and entrained solid fraction, if any.
[0044] In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst stream contains a fresh catalyst. In another
embodiment, the slurry catalyst stream contains a mixture of at least a fresh catalyst
and a recycled (used) catalyst. In a third embodiment, the slurry catalyst stream
comprises a used catalyst. In another embodiment, the slurry catalyst contains a well-dispersed
catalyst precursor composition capable of forming an active catalyst in situ within
the feed heaters and/or the contacting zone. The catalyst particles can be introduced
into the medium (diluent) as powder in one embodiment, a precursor in another embodiment,
or after a pretreatment step in a third embodiment. In one embodiment, the medium
(or diluent) is a hydrocarbon oil diluent. In another embodiment, the liquid medium
is the heavy oil feedstock itself. In yet another embodiment, the liquid medium is
a hydrocarbon oil other than the heavy oil feedstock, e.g., a VGO medium or diluent.
[0045] In one embodiment, the bleed off stream comprises non-volatile materials from a separation
zone in the system, typically the last separation zone, comprising unconverted materials,
slurry catalyst, a small amount of heavier hydrocracked liquid products, small amounts
of coke, asphaltenes, etc. In another embodiment, the bleed off stream is the bottom
stream from an interstage solvent deasphalting unit in the system. In embodiments
wherein the bleed off stream is diverted from the bottom stream of a separation zone,
the bleed stream typically ranges from 1 to 35 wt. %; 3-20 wt. %; or 5-15wt. % of
the total heavy oil feedstock to the system. In embodiments therein the bleed off
stream is diverted from the bottom of a deasphalting unit, the bleed off stream ranges
from 0.30 to 5 wt.%; 1-30 wt. %; or 0.5 to 10 wt. % of the heavy oil feed stock.
[0046] In one embodiment, the bleed-off stream contains between 3 to 30 wt. % slurry catalyst.
In another embodiment, the slurry catalyst amount ranges from 5 to 20 wt. %. In yet
another embodiment, the bleed-off stream contains an amount of slurry catalyst ranging
from 1 to 15 wt. % in concentration.
[0047] In some embodiments, instead of sending all of the fresh catalyst to the first contacting
zone as in the prior art process, at least a portion of the fresh catalyst is diverted
to at least one other contacting zones (other than the 1
st contacting zone) in the system.
[0048] Also in some embodiments, instead of sending all of the heavy oil feed to be upgraded
to the first contacting zone, at least a portion of the heavy oil feed is diverted
to at least one other contacting zones in the system.
[0049] In other embodiments, a combination feed scheme is employed with a portion of the
fresh catalyst feed and a portion of the heavy oil feed being diverted to at least
one other contact zones other than the first contacting zone in the heavy oil upgrading
system.
[0050] In one embodiment, the upgrade system comprises at least two upflow reactors in series
with at least two separators, with each separator being positioned right after each
reactor and with the interstage SDA unit being positioned before at least one reactor
in the system. In another embodiment, the upgrade system comprises at least two upflow
reactors and at least two separators in series, with of each of the separators being
positioned right after each reactor, and the interstage SDA unit being position after
the 1
st separator in the series. In a fourth embodiment, the upgrade system may comprise
a combination of separate reactors and separate separators in series with multi-stage
reactor-separators, with the SDA being positioned as an interstage treatment system
between any two reactors in series.
[0051] Heavy Oil Feed: The unconverted heavy oil feed here herein may comprise one or more different heavy
oil feeds from different sources as a single feed stream, or as separate heavy oil
feed streams. In some embodiments of the present invention, at least a portion of
the heavy oil feed (to be upgraded) is "split" or diverted to at least one other contacting
zones in the system (other than the first contacting zone), or to the interstage SDA
unit prior to being fed into a contacting zone.
[0052] In one embodiment, "at least a portion" means at least 5% of the heavy oil feed to
be upgraded is diverted to at least one other contacting zones in the system other
than the first contacting zone. In another embodiment, at least 10%. In a third embodiment,
at least 20%. In a fourth embodiment, at least 30% of the heavy oil feed is diverted
to at least a contacting zone other than the first one in the system. In one embodiment,
the heavy oil feedstock is preheated prior to being blended with the slurry catalyst
feed stream(s). In another embodiment, the blend of heavy oil feedstock and slurry
catalyst feed is preheated to create a feedstock that is sufficiently of low viscosity
to allow good mixing of the catalyst into the feedstock. In one embodiment, the preheating
is conducted at a temperature that is at least about 100°C (180°F) less than the hydrocracking
temperature within the contacting zone. In another embodiment, the preheating is at
a temperature that is about at least 50°C less than the hydrocracking temperature
within the contacting zone.
[0053] Additional Hydrocarbon Feed: In one embodiment, additional hydrocarbon oil feed, e.g., VGO (vacuum gas oil),
naphtha, MCO (medium cycle oil), solvent donor, or other aromatic solvents, etc. in
an amount ranging from 2 to 40 wt. % of the heavy oil feed can be optionally added
as part of the heavy oil feed stream to any of the contacting zones in the system.
In one embodiment, the additional hydrocarbon feed functions as a diluent to lower
the viscosity of the heavy oil feed.
[0054] Embodiments of The Heavy Oil Split Feed Scheme: In some embodiments, at least a portion of the heavy oil feed (to be upgraded) is
"split" or diverted to at least one other contacting zones in the system (other than
the first contacting zone).
[0055] In one embodiment, "at least a portion" meaning at least 5% of the heavy oil feed
to be upgraded. In another embodiment, at least 10%. In a third embodiment, at least
20%. In a fourth embodiment, at least 30% of the heavy oil feed is diverted to at
least a contacting zone other than the first one in the system.
[0056] In one embodiment, less than 90% of the unconverted heavy oil feed is fed to the
first reactor in the system, with 10% or more of the unconverted heavy oil feed being
diverted to the other contacting zone(s) in the system. In another embodiment, the
heavy oil feed is being equally split between the contacting zones in the system.
In yet another embodiment, less than 80% of the unconverted heavy oil feed is fed
to the first contacting zone in the system, and the remaining heavy oil feed is diverted
to the last contacting zone in the system. In a fourth embodiment, less than 60% of
the heavy oil feed is fed to the first contacting zone in the system, and the remainder
of the unconverted heavy oil feed is equally split between the other contacting zones
in the system.
[0057] The unconverted heavy oil feed herein may comprise one or more different heavy oil
feeds from different sources as a single feed stream or separate heavy oil feed streams.
In one embodiment, a single heavy oil conduit pipe goes to all the contacting zones.
In another embodiment, multiple heavy oil conduits are employed to supply the heavy
oil feed to the different contacting zones, with some heavy oil feed stream(s) going
to one or more contacting zones, and some of the other unconverted heavy oil feed
stream(s) going to one or more different contacting zones.
[0058] In one embodiment, the heavy oil feedstock is preheated prior to being blended with
the slurry catalyst feed, and / or prior to being introduced into the hydrocracking
reactors (contacting zones). In another embodiment, the blend of heavy oil feedstock
and slurry catalyst feed is preheated to create a feedstock that is sufficiently of
low viscosity to allow good mixing of the catalyst into the feedstock.
[0059] In one embodiment, the preheating is conducted at a temperature that is about 100°C
(180°F) less than the hydrocracking temperature within the contacting zone. In another
embodiment, the preheating is at a temperature that is about 50°C less than the hydrocracking
temperature within the contacting zone.
[0060] Hydrogen Feed: In one embodiment, a hydrogen containing gas is provided to the process. The hydrogen
can also be added to the heavy oil feed prior to entering the preheater, or after
the preheater. In one embodiment, the hydrogen feed enters the contacting zone co-currently
with the heavy oil feed in the same conduit. In another embodiment, the hydrogen source
may be added to the contacting zone in a direction that is counter to the flow of
the crude feed. In a third embodiment, the hydrogen enters the contacting zone via
a gas conduit separately from the combined heavy oil and slurry catalyst feed stream.
In a fourth embodiment, the hydrogen feed is introduced directly to the combined catalyst
and heavy oil feedstock prior to being introduced into the contacting zone. In yet
another embodiment, the hydrogen gas and the combined heavy oil and catalyst feed
are introduced at the bottom of the reactor as separate streams. In yet another embodiment,
hydrogen gas can be fed to several sections of the contacting zone.
[0061] In one embodiment, the hydrogen source is provided to the process at a rate (based
on ratio of the gaseous hydrogen source to the crude feed) of 0.1 Nm
3/m
3 to about 100,000 Nm
3/m
3 (0.563 to 563,380 SCF/bbl), about 0.5 Nm
3/m
3 to about 10,000 Nm
3/m
3 (2.82 to 56,338 SCF/bbl), about 1 Nm
3/m
3 to about 8,000 Nm
3/m
3 (5.63 to 45,070 SCF/bbl), about 2 Nm
3/m
3 to about 5,000 Nm
3/m
3 (11.27 to 28,169 SCF/bbl), about 5 Nm
3/m
3 to about 3,000 Nm
3/m
3 (28.2 to 16,901 SCF/bbl), or about 10 Nm
3/m
3 to about 800 Nm
3/m
3 (56.3 to 4,507 SCF/bbl). In one embodiment, some of the hydrogen (25 -75%) is supplied
to the first contacting zone, and the rest is added as supplemental hydrogen to other
contacting zones in system.
[0062] In one embodiment, the upgrade system produces a volume yield over 100% (compared
to the heavy oil input) in upgraded products as added hydrogen expands the heavy oil
total volume. The upgraded products, i.e., lower boiling hydrocarbons, in one embodiment
include liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), and
jet and fuel oils. In a second embodiment, the upgrade system provides a volume yield
of at least 110% in the form of LPG, naphtha, jet & fuel oils, and VGO. In a third
embodiment, over 115%.
[0063] In one embodiment of the upgrade system, at least 98 wt % of heavy oil feed is converted
to lighter products. In a second embodiment, at least 98.5% of heavy oil feed is converted
to lighter products. In a third embodiment, the conversion rate is at least 99%. In
a fourth embodiment, the conversion rate is at least 95%. In a fifth embodiment, the
conversion rate is at least 80%. In a sixth embodiment, the conversion rate is at
least 60%. As used herein, conversion rate refers to the conversion of heavy oil feedstock
to less than 1000°F. (538°C) boiling point materials.
[0064] The hydrogen source, in some embodiments, is combined with carrier gas(es) and recirculated
through the contacting zone. Carrier gas may be, for example, nitrogen, helium, and/or
argon. The carrier gas may facilitate flow of the crude feed and/or flow of the hydrogen
source in the contacting zone(s). The carrier gas may also enhance mixing in the contacting
zone(s). In some embodiments, a hydrogen source (for example, hydrogen, methane or
ethane) may be used as a carrier gas and recirculated through the contacting zone.
[0065] Catalyst Feed: In one embodiment, all of the slurry catalyst feed is provided to the first contacting
zone. In other embodiments, at least a portion of the catalyst feed is "split" or
diverted to at least one other contacting zones in the system (other than the first
contacting zone). In another embodiment, all the contacting zones in operation receive
a slurry catalyst feed (along with a heavy oil feed). In yet another embodiment, the
process is configured for a flexible catalyst feed scheme such that the fresh catalyst
can sometimes be fed entirely to the last reactor in the system for certain process
conditions (for certain desired product characteristics), or 50% to the first reactor
in the system for some of the process runs, or split equally or according to pre-determined
proportions to all of the reactors in the system, or split according to pre-determined
proportions for the same fresh catalyst to be fed to the different reactors at different
concentrations.
[0066] The slurry catalyst feed used herein may comprise one or more different slurry catalysts
as a single catalyst feed stream or separate feed streams. In one embodiment, a single
fresh catalyst feed stream is supplied to the contacting zones. In another embodiment,
the catalyst feed comprises multiple and different catalyst types, with a certain
catalyst type going to one or more contacting zones (e.g., the first contacting zone
in the system) as a separate stream, and a different slurry catalyst going to contacting
zone(s) other than the 1
st contacting zone in the system as a different catalyst stream.
[0067] In one embodiment, "at least a portion" means at least 10% of the fresh catalyst.
In another embodiment, at least 20%. In a third embodiment, at least 40%. In a fourth
embodiment, at least 50% of the fresh catalyst is diverted to at least a contacting
zone other than the first one in the system. In a fifth embodiment, all of the fresh
catalyst is diverted to a contacting zone other than the 1
st contacting zone.
[0068] In one embodiment, less than 20% of the fresh catalyst is fed to the first reactor
in the system, with 80% or more of the fresh catalyst being diverted to the other
contacting zone(s) in the system. In another embodiment, the fresh catalyst is being
equally split between the contacting zones in the system. In one embodiment, at least
a portion of the fresh catalyst feed is sent to at least one of the intermediate contacting
zones and / or the last contacting zone in the system. In another embodiment, all
of the fresh catalyst is sent to the last contacting zone in the system, with the
first contacting zone in the system only getting recycled catalyst from one or more
of the processes in the system, e.g., from one of the separation zones in the system
or from a solvent deasphalting unit.
[0069] In one embodiment with an interstage SDA unit, at least a portion of the fresh catalyst
feed is sent to the contacting zone immediately following the interstage SDA unit.
In another embodiment, all of the fresh catalyst is sent to contacting zone(s) other
than the 1
st one in the system, with the first contacting zone only getting SDA bottoms from the
SDA unit and recycled catalyst from one or more of the processes in the system, e.g.,
from one of the separation zones in the system.
[0070] In one embodiment, the fresh catalyst is combined with the recycled catalyst stream
from one of the processes in the system, e.g., a separation zone, a distillation column,
a SDA unit, or a flash tank, and the combined catalyst feed is thereafter blended
with heavy oil feedstock for feeding into the contacting zone(s). In another embodiment,
the fresh catalyst and the recycled catalyst streams are blended into the heavy oil
feedstock as separate streams.
[0071] In one embodiment, the recycled catalyst stream from one of the processes in the
system, e.g., a separation zone, the SDA unit, etc., is combined with fresh slurry
catalyst as one single catalyst feed stream. The combined catalyst feed is thereafter
blended with the (treated or untreated) heavy oil feedstock stream(s) for feeding
into the contacting zone(s). In another embodiment, the fresh catalyst and the recycled
catalyst streams are blended into the heavy oil feedstock stream(s) as separate streams.
[0072] In one embodiment, the process is configured for a flexible catalyst feed scheme
such that the catalyst feed can sometimes be fed at full rate (100% of the required
catalyst rate) to the first reactor in the system for a certain period of time, then
split equally or according to pre-determined proportions to all of the reactors in
the system for a pre-determined amount of time, or split according to pre-determined
proportions for the catalyst feed to be fed to the different reactors at different
concentrations.
[0073] In one embodiment, sending different catalysts to the front end and back end contacting
zones can be useful in mitigating the vanadium trapping issue and sustain the overall
upgrade performance. In one embodiment, a Ni-only or a NiMo sulfide slurry catalyst
rich in Ni is sent to the front end reactor to help reduce vanadium trapping in the
system, while a different catalyst, e.g., Mo sulfide or a NiMo sulfide catalyst rich
in Mo, can be injected into the back end reactor(s) to maintain an overall high conversion
rate, improve product quality and possibly reduce the gas yield in one embodiment.
As used herein, a slurry catalyst rich in Ni means that the Ni / Mo ratio is greater
than 0.15 (as wt. %) Conversely, a slurry catalyst rich in Mo means that the Ni /
Mo ratio is less than 0.05 (as wt. %).
[0074] In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst feed is first preconditioned before entering
one of the contacting zones, or before being brought into contact with the heavy oil
feed before entering the contacting zones. In one example, the catalyst enters into
a preconditioning unit along with hydrogen at a rate from 89 l./l. to 1336 l./l. (500
to 7500 SCF/BBL) wherein BBL here refers to the total volume of heavy oil feed to
the system. It is believed that instead of bringing a cold catalyst in contact with
the heavy oil feed, the preconditioning step helps with the hydrogen adsorption into
the active catalyst sites, and ultimately the conversion rate. In one embodiment in
the precondition unit, the slurry catalyst / hydrogen mixture is heated to a temperature
between 300°F to 1000°F (149 to 538°C). In another embodiment, the catalyst is preconditioned
in hydrogen at a temperature of 500 to 725 °F (260 to 385°C.). In yet another embodiment,
the mixture is heated under a pressure of 2068.4 to 2206.2 kPa (300 to 3200 psi) in
one embodiment; 3447.4 to 20684.3 kPa (500 to 3000 psi) in a second embodiment; and
4136.8 to 17246.9 kPa (600 to 2500 psi) in a third embodiment.
[0075] Catalysts Employed: The slurry catalyst comprises an active catalyst in a hydrocarbon oil diluent. In
one embodiment, the catalyst is a sulfided catalyst comprising at least a Group VIB
metal, or at least a Group VIII metal, or at least a group IIB metal, e.g., a ferric
sulfide catalyst, zinc sulfide, nickel sulfide, molybdenum sulfide, or an iron zinc
sulfide catalyst. In another embodiment, the catalyst is a multi-metallic catalyst
comprising at least a Group VIB metal and at least a Group VIII metal (as a promoter),
wherein the metals may be in elemental form or in the form of a compound of the metal.
In one example, the catalyst is a MoS
2 catalyst promoted with at least a group VIII metal compound.
[0076] In one embodiment, the catalyst is a bulk multi-metallic catalyst comprising at least
one Group VIII non-noble metal and at least two Group VIB metals, and wherein the
ratio of the at least two Group VIB metals to the Group VIII non-noble metal is from
about 10:1 to about 1:10. In another embodiment, the catalyst is of the formula (M
t)
a(X
u)
b(S
v)
d(C
w)
e(H
x)
f(O
y)
g(N
z)
h,, wherein M represents at least one group VIB metal, such as Mo, W, etc. or a combination
thereof; and X functions as a promoter metal, representing at least one of: a non-noble
Group VIII metal such as Ni, Co; a Group VIII metal such as Fe; a Group VIB metal
such as Cr; a Group IVB metal such as Ti; a Group IIB metal such as Zn, and combinations
thereof (X is hereinafter referred to as "Promoter Metal"). Also in the equation,
t, u, v, w, x, y, z representing the total charge for each of the component (M, X,
S, C, H, O and N, respectively); t
a+u
b+v
d+w
e+x
f+y
g+z
h=0. The subscripts ratio of
b to
a has a value of 0 to 5, and (0 <=
b/
a <= 5). S represents sulfur with the value of the subscript
d ranging from (
a + 0.5b) to (5
a + 2b). C represents carbon with subscript e having a value of 0 to 11(
a+
b). H is hydrogen with the value
off ranging from 0 to 7(
a+
b)
. O represents oxygen with the value of g ranging from 0 to 5(
a +
b); and N represents nitrogen with
h having a value of 0 to 0.5(
a +
b)
. In one embodiment, subscript b has a value of 0, for a single metallic component
catalyst, e.g., Mo only catalyst (no promoter).
[0077] In one embodiment, the catalyst is the catalyst is prepared from catalyst precursor
compositions including organometallic complexes or compounds, e.g., oil soluble compounds
or complexes of transition metals and organic acids. Examples of such compounds include
naphthenates, pentanedionates, octoates, and acetates of Group VIB and Group VIII
metals such as Mo, Co, W, etc. such as molybdenum naphthanate, vanadium naphthanate,
vanadium octoate, molybdenum hexacarbonyl, and vanadium hexacarbonyl.
[0078] In one embodiment, the catalyst is a MoS
2 catalyst, promoted with at least a group VIII metal compound. In another embodiment,
the catalyst is a bulk multimetallic catalyst, wherein said bulk multimetallic catalyst
comprises of at least one Group VIII non-noble metal and at least two Group VIB metals
and wherein the ratio of said at least two Group VIB metals to said at least one Group
VIII non-noble metal is from about 10:1 to about 1:10.
[0079] In one embodiment, the catalyst feed comprises slurry catalyst having an average
particle size of at least 1 micron in a hydrocarbon oil diluent. In another embodiment,
the catalyst feed comprises slurry catalyst having an average particle size in the
range of 1 - 20 microns. In a third embodiment, the slurry catalyst has an average
particle size in the range of 2 - 10 microns. In one embodiment, the feed comprises
a slurry catalyst having an average particle size ranging from colloidal (nanometer
size) to about 1-2 microns. In another embodiment, the catalyst comprises catalyst
molecules and/or extremely small particles that are colloidal in size (i.e., less
than 100 nm, less than about 10 nm, less than about 5 nm, and less than about 1 nm).
In operations, the colloidal / nanometer sized particles aggregate in a hydrocarbon
diluent, forming a slurry catalyst with an average particle size in the range of 1-20
microns. In yet another embodiment, the catalyst comprises single layer MoS
2 clusters of nanometer sizes, e.g., 5-10 nm on edge.
[0080] In one embodiment, a sufficient amount of fresh catalyst and used catalyst is fed
to the contacting zone(s) for each contacting zone to have a slurry (solid) catalyst
concentration ranging from 2 to 30 wt. %. In a second embodiment, the (solid) catalyst
concentration in the reactor ranges from 3 to 20 wt.%. In a third embodiment, from
5 to 10 wt. %.
[0081] In one embodiment, the amount of fresh catalyst feed into the contacting zone(s)
range from 50 to 15000 wppm of Mo (concentration in heavy oil feed). In a second embodiment,
the concentration of the fresh catalyst feed ranges from 150 to 2000 wppm Mo. In a
third embodiment, from 250 to 5000 wppm Mo. In a fourth embodiment, the concentration
is less than 10,000 wppm Mo. The concentration of the fresh catalyst into each contacting
zone may vary depending on the contacting zone employed in the system, as catalyst
may become more concentrated as volatile fractions are removed from a non-volatile
resid fraction, thus requiring adjustment of the catalyst concentration.
[0082] Optional Treatment System - SDA: In one embodiment of the invention, a solvent deasphalting unit (SDA) is employed
before the first contacting zone to pre-treat the heavy oil feedstock. In yet another
embodiment, a solvent deasphalting unit is employed as an intermediate unit located
after one of the intermediate separation zones.
[0083] SDA units are typically used in refineries to extract incremental lighter hydrocarbons
from a heavy hydrocarbon stream, whereby the extracted oil is typically called deasphalted
oil (DAO), while leaving a residue stream behind that is more concentrated in heavy
molecules and heteroatoms, typically known as SDA Tar, SDA Bottoms, etc. The SDA can
be a separate unit or a unit integrated into the upgrade system.
[0084] Various solvents may be used in the SDA, ranging from propanes to hexanes, depending
on the desired level of deasphalting prior to feeding the contact zone. In one embodiment,
the SDA is configured to produce a deasphalted oil (DAO) for blending with the catalyst
feed or feeding directly into the contacting zones instead of, or in addition to the
heavy oil feed. As such, the solvent type and operating conditions can be optimized
such that a high volume and acceptable quality DAO is produced and fed to the contacting
zone. In this embodiment, a suitable solvent to be used includes, but not limited
to hexane or similar C6+ solvent for a low volume SDA Tar and high volume DAO. This
scheme would allow for the vast majority of the heavy oil feed to be upgraded in the
subsequent contacting zone, while the very heaviest, bottom of the barrel bottoms
that does not yield favorable incremental conversion economics due to the massive
hydrogen addition requirement, to be used in some other manner.
[0085] In one embodiment, all of the heavy oil feed is pre-treated in the SDA and the DAO
product is fed into the first contacting zone, or fed according to a split feed scheme
with at least a portion going to a contacting zone other than the first in the series.
In another embodiment, some of the heavy oil feed (depending on the source) is first
pre-treated in the SDA and some of the feedstock is fed directly into the contacting
zone(s) untreated. In yet another embodiment, the DAO is combined with the untreated
heavy oil feedstock as one feed stream to the contacting zone(s). In another embodiment,
the DAO and the untreated heavy oil feedstock are fed to the system as in separate
feed conduits, with the DAO going to one or more of the contacting zones and the untreated
heavy oil feed going to one or more of the same or different contacting zones.
[0086] In an embodiment wherein the SDA is employed as an intermediate unit, the non-volatile
fraction containing the slurry catalyst and optionally minimum quantities of coke
/ asphaltenes, etc. from at least one of the separation zones is sent to the SDA for
treatment. From the SDA unit, the DAO is sent to at least one of the contacting zones
as a feed stream by itself, in combination with a heavy oil feedstock as a feed, or
in combination with the bottom stream from one of the separation zones as a feed.
The DA Bottoms containing asphaltenes are sent away to recover metal in any carry-over
slurry catalyst, or for applications requiring asphaltenes, e.g., blended to fuel
oil, used in asphalt, or utilized in some other applications.
[0087] In one embodiment, the quality of the DAO and DA Bottoms is varied by adjusting the
solvent used and the desired recovery of DAO relative to the heavy oil feed. In an
optional pretreatment unit such as the SDA, the more DAO oil that is recovered, the
poorer the overall quality of the DAO, and the poorer the overall quality of the DA
Bottoms. With respect to the solvent selection, typically, as a lighter solvent is
used for the SDA, less DAO will be produced, but the quality will be better, whereas
if a heavier solvent is used, more DAO will be produced, but the quality will be lower.
This is due to, among other factors, the solubility of the asphaltenes and other heavy
molecules in the solvent.
[0088] Controlling Heavy Metal Deposit - Optional Water Injection: As used herein, the front-end contacting zone (or the first contacting zone) means
the 1
st reactor in a system with three or less contacting zones. In another embodiment of
a system with more than three contacting zones, the first front-end contacting zone
may include both first and second reactors. In yet another embodiment, the first contacting
zone means the 1
st reactor only.
[0089] As used herein, the term "water" is used to indicate either water and / or steam.
In one embodiment to control heavy metal deposit, water is optionally injected into
the system. In one embodiment, the injection is at a rate of about 1 to 25 wt. % (relative
to the heavy oil feedstock). In one embodiment, a sufficient amount of water is injected
for a water concentration in the system in the range of 2 to 15 wt. %. In a third
embodiment, a sufficient amount is injected for a water concentration in the range
of 4 to 10 wt. %.
[0090] The water can be added to the heavy oil feedstock before or after preheating. In
one embodiment, a substantial amount of water is added to the heavy oil feedstock
admixture that is to be preheated, and a substantial amount of water is added directly
to the front end contacting zone(s). In another embodiment, water is added to the
front-end contacting zone(s) via the heavy oil feedstock only. In yet another embodiment,
at least 50% of the water is added to the heavy oil feedstock mixture to be heated,
and the rest of the water is added directly to the front end contacting zone(s).
[0091] In one embodiment, the water introduced into the system at the preheating stage (prior
to the preheating of the heavy oil feedstock), in an amount of about 1 to about 25
wt. % of the incoming heavy oil feedstock. In one embodiment, water is added to as
part of the heavy oil feed to all of the contacting zones. In another embodiment,
water is added to the heavy oil feed to the first contacting zone only. In yet another
embodiment, water is added to the feed to the first two contacting zones only.
[0092] In one embodiment, water is added directly into the contacting zone at multiple points
along the contacting zone, in ratio of 1 to 25 wt. % of the heavy oil feedstock. In
yet another embodiment, water is added directly into the first few contacting zones
in the process which are the most prone to deposits of heavy metals.
[0093] In one embodiment, some of the water is added to the process in the form of dilution
steam. In one embodiment, at least 30% of the water added is in the form of steam.
In the embodiments where water is added as dilution steam, the steam may be added
at any point in the process. For example, it may be added to the heavy oil feedstock
before or after preheating, to the catalyst / heavy oil mixture stream, and / or directly
into the vapor phase of the contacting zones, or at multiple points along the first
contacting zone. The dilution steam stream may comprise process steam or clean steam.
The steam may be heated or superheated in a furnace prior to being fed into the upgrade
process.
[0094] It is believed that the presence of the water in the process favorably alter the
metallic compound sulfur molecular equilibrium, thus reducing the heavy metal deposit.
In one embodiment, the addition of water is also believed to help control / maintain
a desired temperature profile in the contacting zones. In yet another embodiment,
it is believed that the addition of water to the front end contacting zone(s) lowers
the temperature of the reactor(s). As the reactor temperature is lowered, it is believed
that the rate of reaction of the most reactive vanadium species slows down, allowing
vanadium deposition onto the slurry catalyst to proceed in a more controlled manner
and for the catalyst to carry the vanadium deposits out of the reactor thus limiting
the solid deposit in the reactor equipment.
[0095] In one embodiment, the addition of water reduces the heavy metal deposits in the
reactor equipment at least 25% compared to an operation without the addition of water,
for a comparable period of time in operation, e.g., for at least 2 months. In another
embodiment, the addition of water reduces heavy metal deposits of at least 50% compared
to an operation without the water addition. In a third embodiment, the addition of
water reduces heavy metal deposits of at least 75% compared to an operation without
the water addition.
[0096] Controlling Heavy Metal Deposit with Reactor Temperature: In one embodiment, instead of and / or in addition to the addition of water to the
front end contacting zone(s), the temperature of the front end contacting zone(s)
most prone to heavy metal deposits is lowered.
[0097] In one embodiment, the temperature of the first reactor is set to be at least 10°F.
(5.56°C.) lower than the next reactor in series. In a second embodiment, the first
reactor temperature is set to be at least 15°F. (8.33°C.) than the next reactor in
series. In a third embodiment, the temperature is set to be at least 20°F. (11.11°C.)
lower. In a fourth embodiment, the temperature is set to be at least 25°F. (13.89°C.)
lower than the next reactor in series.
[0098] Controlling Heavy Metal Deposit with Recycled Catalyst Stream: In one embodiment, at least a portion of the non-volatile stream from at least one
of the separation zones and / or an interstage deasphalting unit is recycled back
to the front end contacting zone(s) to control the heavy metal deposits.
[0099] According to the present invention this recycled stream ranges from 35 to 50 wt%
of the total heavy oil feedstock to the process.
[0100] In one embodiment, the recycled stream comprises non-volatile materials from the
last separation zone in the system, containing unconverted materials, heavier hydrocracked
liquid products, slurry catalyst, small amounts of coke, asphaltenes, etc. In one
embodiment, the recycled stream contains between 3 to 30 wt. % slurry catalyst. In
another embodiment, the catalyst amount ranges from 5 to 20 wt. % . In yet another
embodiment, the recycled stream contains 1 to 15 wt. % slurry catalyst.
[0101] In some embodiments, it is believed that with additional recycled catalyst provided
by the recycled stream, more catalytic surface area (via the slurry catalyst in the
recycled stream) is available to spread the heavy metal deposition, thus there is
less trapping or deposition on the equipment. The additional catalyst surface areas
provided by the recycled stream helps minimize overloading the catalyst surface with
heavy metal deposit, leading to deposition on the process equipment (walls, internals,
etc.).
[0102] Process Conditions: In one embodiment, the process condition being controlled to be more or less uniformly
across the contacting zones. In another embodiment, the condition varies between the
contacting zones for upgrade products with specific properties.
[0103] In one embodiment, the upgrade system is maintained under hydrocracking conditions,
e.g., at a minimum temperature to effect hydrocracking of a heavy oil feedstock. In
one embodiment, the system operates at a temperature ranging from 400°C (752°F) to
600°C (1112 °F), and a pressure ranging from 10 MPa (1450 psi) to 25 MPa (3625 psi).
In one embodiment, the process condition being controlled to be more or less uniformly
across the contacting zones. In another embodiment, the condition varies between the
contacting zones for upgrade products with specific properties.
[0104] In one embodiment, the contacting zone process temperature ranges from about 400°C
(752°F) to about 600°C (1112 °F), less than 500°C (932°F) in another embodiment, and
greater than 425°C. (797°F) in another embodiment. In one embodiment, the system operates
with a temperature difference between the inlet and outlet of a contacting zone ranging
from 5 to 50°F (2.7 to 27.7°C). In a second embodiment, from 10 to 40°F (5.5 to 22.2°C).
[0105] The temperature of the separation zone is maintained within ± 90°F (about ± 50°C)
of the contacting zone temperature in one embodiment, within ± 70°F (about + 38.9°C)
in a second embodiment, within + 15°F (about + 8.3°C) in a third embodiment, and within
+ 5°F (about + 2.8°C) in a fourth embodiment. In one embodiment, the temperature difference
between the last separation zone and the immediately preceding contacting zone is
within + 50°F (about ± 28°C).
[0106] The process pressure in the contacting zones ranges from about 10 MPa (1,450 psi)
to about 25 MPa (3,625 psi) in one embodiment, about 15 MPa (2,175 psi) to about 20
MPa (2,900 psi) in a second embodiment, less than 22 MPa (3,190 psi) in a third embodiment,
and more than 14 MPa (2,030 psi) in a fourth embodiment. In one embodiment, the pressure
of the separation zone is maintained within ∓68.9 to ∓ 344.7 kPa (∓10 to ∓50 psi)
of the preceding contacting zone in one embodiment, and within ∓13.7 to ∓ 68.9 kPa
(∓2 to ∓10 psi) in a second embodiment.
[0107] In one embodiment, the upgrade system is configured for optimal operation, e.g.,
efficiency with much less downtime due to equipment plugging compared to the prior
art with less than 689.5 kPa (100 psi) pressure drop. The optimal efficiency is obtained
in one embodiment with minimal pressure drop in the system, wherein the pressure of
the separation zone is maintained within ∓68.9 to ∓ 689.5 kPa (∓10 to ∓100 psi) of
the preceding contacting zone in one embodiment, within ∓137.8 to ∓ 517.1 kPa (∓20
to ∓75 psi) in a second embodiment, and within ∓344.7 to ∓ 689.5 kPa (∓50 to ∓100
psi) psi in a third embodiment. As used here, the pressure drop refers to the difference
between the exit pressure of the preceding contacting zone X and the entry pressure
of the separation Y, with (X-Y) being less than 689.5 kPa (100 psi).
[0108] Optimal efficiency can also be obtained with minimal pressure from one contacting
zone to the next contacting zone for a system operating sequentially, with the pressure
drop being maintained to be 689.5 kPa (100 psi) or less in one embodiment, and 517.1
kPa (75 psi) or less in a second embodiment, and less than 344.8 kPa (75 psi) in a
third embodiment. The pressure drop herein refers to the difference between the exit
pressure of one contacting zone and the entry pressure of the next contacting zone.
[0109] In one embodiment, the contacting zone is in direct fluid communication to the next
separation zone or contacting zone for a minimum pressure drop. As used herein, direct
fluid communication means that there is free flow from the contacting zone to the
next separation zone (or the next contacting zone) in series, with no flow restriction.
In one embodiment, direct fluid communication is obtained with no flow restriction
due to presence of valves, orifices (or a similar device), or changes in pipe diameter.
[0110] In one embodiment, the minimal pressure drop from the contacting zone to the next
separation zone or contacting zone (upon entering the separating zone or the contacting
zone) is due to piping components, e.g., elbows, bends, tees in the line, etc., and
not due to the use of pressure reducing device such as valves, control valves, etc.
to induce the pressure drop as in the prior art. In the prior art, it is taught that
the separation zone functions as an interstage pressure differential separator.
[0111] In one embodiment, the minimal pressure drop is induced by friction loss, wall drag,
volume increase, and changes in height as the effluent flows from the contacting zone
to the next equipment in series. If valves are used in the once through system, the
valves are selected / configured such that the pressure drop from one equipment, e.g.,
the contacting zone, to the next piece of equipment is kept to be at 100 psi or lower.
[0112] In one embodiment, the liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of the heavy oil feed
will generally range from about 0.025 h
-1 to about 10 h
-1, about 0.5 h
-1 to about 7.5 h
-1, about 0.1 h.
-1 to about 5 h
-1, about 0.75 h
-1 to about 1.5 h
-1, or about 0.2 h
-1 to about 10 h
-1. In some embodiments, LHSV is at least 0.5 h
-1, at least 1 h
-1, at least 1.5 h
-1, or at least 2 h
-1. In some embodiments, the LHSV ranges from 0.025 to 0.9 h
-1. In another embodiment, the LHSV ranges from 0.1 to 3 LHSV. In another embodiment,
the LHSV is less than 0.5 h
-1.
[0113] In one embodiment wherein all of the non-volatile fractions stream from at least
a separation zone is sent to the SDA unit for deasphalting, the solid deposit in the
last contacting zone in the system decreases by at least 10% (in terms of deposit
volume) after a similar run time compared to a prior art operation without deasphalting
with the SDA unit. In a second embodiment, the solid deposit decreases by at least
20% compared to an operation without the use of the interstage SDA unit. In a third
embodiment, the solid deposit decreases at least 30%.
[0114] In various embodiments, it is found that by diverting some, if not all, of the fresh
catalyst to contacting zone(s) other than the first one in the system, the overall
cracking efficiency of the heavy oil feedstock was not noticeably or at all impacted,
as compared to the prior art feed scheme with all of the fresh catalyst going to the
1
st contact zone. In one embodiment, the shift in the location of the fresh catalyst
injection yields a significant boost in overall catalytic activity, with the improved
quality of the non-volatile stream from the last separation zone in the system (bleed
stream, "Stripper Bottoms" or STB) in terms of API, viscosity, MCR level, nickel,
Hydrogen / Carbon ratio, and hot heptane asphaltenes (HHA) level. In some other embodiments,
less catalyst bleeding is also observed with the overall improvement in catalytic
activity.
[0115] In one embodiment, the STB product improvements include a nickel reduction of at
least 10%, in a second embodiment, a nickel reduction of at least 20%. In a third
embodiment, a Ni level of less than 10 ppm.
[0116] In one embodiment, the MCR reduction in the STB is at least 5%. In another embodiment,
the MCR reduction is at least 10%. In a third embodiment, the MCR level is less than
13 wt. %.
[0117] In one embodiment, the STB displays an API viscosity improvement of at least 15%.
In a second embodiment, an API viscosity improvement of at least 30%. In a third embodiment,
an API viscosity of at least 50%, going from 2.7 to 4.5. It is observed that in some
embodiments, the improvement of the API is due to overall improved catalytic activity,
thus resulting in a higher H/C ratio.
[0118] In embodiments with a heavy oil split feed scheme, it is found that by diverting
a portion of the heavy oil feedstock from the first contacting zone to at least one
other contact zone in the series, the overall coke formation is substantially reduced
as compared to the feed scheme of the prior art with all of the heavy oil feedstock
going to the 1
st contacting zone. Additionally, with at least a portion of the heavy oil feedstock
being diverted to contacting zones other than the 1
st in the system, there is some liquid dilution in these contacting zones (that would
not have been present in the prior art scheme). The liquid dilution allows a more
uniform catalyst concentration profile across all reactors in the system, thus protecting
the last reactor against solids level excursion that could lead to operation problems.
[0119] In some embodiments with a heavy oil split feed scheme, it is also observed that
the overall system efficiency improves as the conversion level in the reactors (contacting
zones) increases, allowing for additional oil vaporization and corresponding decrease
in liquid throughput and increase in catalyst concentration. This would essentially
boost the efficiency of the system with a lower liquid throughput (or higher liquid
residence time) and higher catalyst concentration. Additionally, with a secondary
steady heavy oil feed rate directly into the last reactor, the last reactor is protected
against upset conditions that could deprive this vessel of liquid flow. Hence, the
heavy oil split feed scheme reduces or eliminates "over-conversion events" or "dry"
conditions often observed in hydroprocessing reactors. In upgrade system running under
"dry" conditions, insufficient liquid flow is present thus leading to solids buildup
/ coking, degrading flow patterns and / or hydrodynamics, degrading thermometry, loss
of reaction volume, eventually compromised performance, stability and longevity of
the operation.
[0120] Figures Illustrating Embodiments: Reference will be made to the figures to further illustrate embodiments of the invention.
[0121] Figure 1 is a block diagram schematically illustrating a system for upgrading heavy
oil feedstock with reduced heavy metal deposits. First, a heavy oil feedstock is introduced
into the first contacting zone in the system together with a slurry catalyst feed.
In the figure, the slurry catalyst feed comprises a combination of fresh catalyst
and recycled catalyst slurry as separate streams. Hydrogen may be introduced together
with the feed in the same conduit, or optionally, as a separate feed stream. Water
and / or steam may be introduced together with the feed and slurry catalyst in the
same conduit or a separate feed stream. Although not shown, the mixture of water,
heavy oil feed, and slurry catalyst can be preheated in a heater prior to feeding
into the contacting zone. Although not shown, additional hydrocarbon oil feed, e.g.,
VGO, naphtha, in an amount ranging from 2 to 30 wt. % of the heavy oil feed can be
optionally added as part of the feed stream to any of the contacting zones in the
system.
[0122] Although not shown in the figures, the system may comprise recirculating / recycling
channels and pumps for promoting the dispersion of reactants, catalyst, and heavy
oil feedstock in the contacting zones, particularly with a high recirculation flow
rate to the first contacting zone to induce turbulent mixing in the reactor, thus
reducing heavy metal deposits. In one embodiment, a recirculating pump circulates
through the loop reactor, thus maintaining a temperature difference between the reactor
feed point to the exit point ranging from 0.5 to 27.8°C (1 to 50°F), and preferably
between 1.1 and 13.9°C (2-25°F).
[0123] In the contacting zones under hydrocracking conditions, at least a portion of the
heavy oil feedstock (higher boiling point hydrocarbons) is converted to lower boiling
hydrocarbons, forming an upgraded product. The water / steam in the first contacting
zone is expected to cut down on the heavy metal deposits onto the equipment. Although
not illustrated, the temperature of the first contacting zone can be kept at least
2.8 - 13.9 °C (2-25 °F) lower than the temperature of the next contacting zone in
series.
[0124] Upgraded material is withdrawn from the 1
st contacting zone and sent to a separation zone, e.g., a hot separator, operated at
a high temperature and high pressure similar to the contacting zone. The upgraded
material may be alternatively introduced into one or more additional hydroprocessing
reactors (not shown) for further upgrading prior to going to the hot separator. The
separation zone causes or allows the separation of gas and volatile liquids from the
non-volatile fractions. The gaseous and volatile liquid fractions are withdrawn from
the top of the separation zone for further processing. The non-volatile (or less volatile)
fraction is withdrawn from the bottom. Slurry catalyst and entrained solids, coke,
hydrocarbons newly generated in the hot separator, etc., are withdrawn from the bottom
of the separator and fed to the next contacting zone in the series. In one embodiment
(not shown), a portion of the non-volatile stream is recycled back to one of the contacting
zones preceding the separation zone, providing recycled catalyst for use in the hydroconversion
reactions.
[0125] In one embodiment (as indicated by dotted lines), portions of the fresh catalyst
feed and heavy oil feedstock are fed directly into contacting zones (reactors) other
than the 1
st contacting zone in the system. In one embodiment wherein portions of the heavy oil
feedstock are fed directly into contacting zones other than the 1
st contacting zone, water and / or steam is also provided to the contacting zones as
a separate feed stream, or introduced together with the feed and slurry catalyst in
the same conduit.
[0126] The liquid stream from the preceding separation zone is combined with optional fresh
catalyst, optional additional heavy oil feed, optional hydrocarbon oil feedstock such
as VGO (vacuum gas oil), and optionally recycled catalyst (not shown) as the feed
stream for the next contacting zone in the series. Hydrogen may be introduced together
with the feed in the same conduit, or optionally, as a separate feed stream. Upgraded
materials along with slurry catalyst flow to the next separation zone in series for
separation of gas and volatile liquids from the non-volatile fractions. The gaseous
and volatile liquid fractions are withdrawn from the top of the separation zone, and
combined with the gaseous and volatile liquid fractions from a preceding separation
zone for further processing. The non-volatile (or less volatile) fraction stream is
withdrawn and sent to the next contacting zone in series for the unconverted heavy
oil feedstock to be upgraded.
[0127] In the last contacting zone, hydrogen is added along with the unconverted heavy oil
feedstock, optional additional heavy oil feedstock, optional VGO feed, and optional
fresh catalyst. Upgraded materials flow to the next separation zone along with slurry
catalyst, wherein the upgraded products are removed overhead, and a portion of the
non-volatile materials are recycled. In one embodiment, the recycled stream is sent
to the first contacting zone, providing some of recycled catalyst for use in the hydroconversion
reactions. In a second embodiment, the recycled stream is split amongst the contacting
zones preceding the last contacting zone in the series.
[0128] In one embodiment, the system may optionally comprise an in-line hydrotreater (not
shown) for treating the gaseous and volatile liquid fractions from the separation
zones. The in-line hydrotreater in one embodiment employs conventional hydrotreating
catalysts, is operated at a similarly high pressure (within 10 psig) as the rest of
the upgrade system, and capable of removing sulfur, Ni, V, and other impurities from
the upgraded products. In another embodiment, the in-line hydrotreater operates at
a temperature within 100°F of the temperature of the contacting zones.
[0129] Figure 2 is a flow diagram of a heavy oil upgrade process with water injection. As
shown, water 81 is injected into the system with the heavy oil feedstock, with the
mixture being preheated in furnace before being introduced into the contacting zone.
Water / steam can also be optionally injected into the system after the preheater
as stream 82. In this embodiment, the fresh catalyst feed is split amongst the contacting
zones. Recycle catalyst stream 17, water / heavy oil feedstock mixture, and hydrogen
gas 2 are fed to the first contacting zone as feed 3.
[0130] Stream 4 comprising upgraded heavy oil feedstock exits the contacting zone R-10 flows
to a separation zone 40, wherein gases (including hydrogen) and upgraded products
in the form of volatile liquids are separated from the non-volatile liquid fraction
7 and removed overhead as stream 6. The non-volatile stream 7 is sent to the next
contacting zone 20 in series for further upgrade. Non-volatile stream 7 contains slurry
catalyst in combination with unconverted oil, and small amounts of coke and asphaltenes
in some embodiments.
[0131] The upgrade process continues with the other contacting zones as shown, wherein the
feed stream to contacting zone 20 comprises non-volatile fractions, hydrogen feed,
optional VGO feed, and fresh catalyst feed 32. From contacting zone 20, stream 8 comprising
upgraded heavy oil feedstock flows to separation zone 50, wherein upgraded products
are combined with hydrogen and removed as overhead product 9. Bottom stream 11 containing
non-volatile fractions, e.g., catalyst slurry, unconverted oil containing coke and
asphaltenes flow to the next contacting zone in the series 30.
[0132] In contacting zone 30, additional hydrogen containing gas 16, fresh catalyst 33,
optional hydrocarbon feed such as VGO (not shown), optional untreated heavy oil feed
(not shown), are added to the non-volatile stream from the preceding separation zone.
From contacting zone 30, upgraded products, unconverted heavy oil, slurry catalyst,
hydrogen, etc. are removed overhead as stream 12 and sent to the next separation zone
60. From the separator, overhead stream 13 containing hydrogen and upgraded products
is combined with the overhead streams from preceding separation zones, and sent away
for subsequent processing in another part of the system, e.g., to a high pressure
separator and / or lean oil contactor and / or an in-line hydrotreater (not shown).
A portion of the non-volatile stream 17 is removed as bleed-off stream 18. The rest
is recycled back to at least one of the contacting zones (first contacting zone 10
as shown) as a recycled catalyst stream.
[0133] Figure 3 is a flow diagram of another embodiment of the heavy oil upgrade process,
but with steam injection 91 instead of or in addition to the water injection stream
81.
[0134] Figure 4 is a flow diagram of another embodiment of the heavy oil upgrade process,
with a recycled catalyst stream 19 ranging between 35 to 50 wt.% of total heavy oil
feedstock to the process.
[0135] Figure 5 is a block diagram schematically illustrating another embodiment for upgrading
heavy oil feedstock. First, a heavy oil feedstock is introduced into the first contacting
zone in the system together with a slurry catalyst feed. Hydrogen may be introduced
together with the feed in the same conduit, or optionally, as a separate feed stream.
In one embodiment (not shown), optional hydrocarbon oil feedstock such as VGO (vacuum
gas oil), naphtha, MCO (medium cycle oil), solvent donor, or other aromatic solvents,
etc. in an amount ranging from 2 to 30 wt. % of the heavy oil feed. The additional
hydrocarbon feedstock may be used to modify the concentration of metals and impurities
in the system. In the contacting zones under hydrocracking conditions, at least a
portion of the heavy oil feedstock (higher boiling point hydrocarbons) is converted
to lower boiling hydrocarbons, forming an upgraded product.
[0136] Upgraded material is withdrawn from the 1
st contacting zone and sent to a separation zone, e.g., a hot separator. The upgraded
material may be alternatively introduced into one or more additional hydroprocessing
reactors (not shown) for further upgrading prior to going to the hot separator. The
separation zone causes or allows the separation of gas and volatile liquids from the
non-volatile fractions. The gaseous and volatile liquid fractions are withdrawn from
the top of the separation zone for further processing. The non-volatile (or less volatile)
fraction is withdrawn from the bottom. Slurry catalyst, small amounts of heavier hydrocracked
liquid products, and entrained solids, coke, hydrocarbons newly generated in the hot
separator, etc., are withdrawn from the bottom of the separator and fed to the next
contacting zone in the series. In one embodiment (not shown), a portion of the non-volatile
stream is recycled back to the contacting zone directly preceding the separation zone,
in an amount equivalent to 35 to 40 wt. % of the total heavy oil feed.
[0137] The non-volatile stream from the preceding separation zone containing unconverted
feedstock is combined with additional fresh catalyst, optional additional heavy oil
feed, and optionally recycled catalyst (not shown) as the feed stream for the next
contacting zone in the series.
[0138] In the next contacting zone and under hydrocracking conditions, more of the heavy
oil feedstock is upgraded to lower boiling hydrocarbons. Upgraded materials along
with slurry catalyst flow to the next separation zone in series for separation of
gas and volatile liquids from the non-volatile fractions. The non-volatile (or less
volatile) stream is withdrawn from the bottom. The gaseous and volatile liquid fractions
are withdrawn from the top of the separation zone (and combined with the gaseous and
volatile liquid fractions from a preceding separation zone) as "upgraded" products
for further processing or blending, e.g., for final blended products meeting specifications
designated by refineries and / or transportation carriers.
[0139] In one embodiment (not shown), the non-volatile material containing unconverted materials
is sent to the next contacting zone in series. In another embodiment as shown, the
non-volatile material is recycled back to one of the contacting zones in the system,
with a portion of the material being bled off for further processing, e.g., going
to a solvent deasphalting unit, a catalyst deoiling unit and subsequently a metal
recovery system. The recycled non-volatile material in one embodiment is an amount
equivalent to 2 to 50 wt. % of the heavy oil feedstock to the system, providing recycled
catalyst for use in the hydroconversion reactions.
[0140] Depending on the operating conditions, the type of catalyst fed into the contacting
zone and the concentration of the slurry catalyst, in one embodiment, the outlet stream
from the contacting zones comprises a ratio of 20:80 to 60:40 of upgraded products
to unconverted heavy oil feed. In one embodiment, the amount of upgraded products
out of the first contacting zone is in the range of 30-35% to unconverted heavy oil
product of 65-70%.
[0141] Although not shown in the figures, the system may optionally comprise recirculating
/ recycling channels and pumps for promoting the dispersion of reactants, catalyst,
and heavy oil feedstock in the contacting zones. In one embodiment, a recirculating
pump circulates through the loop reactor a volumetric recirculation ratio of 5:1 to
15:1 (recirculated amount to heavy oil feed ratio), thus maintaining a temperature
difference between the reactor feed point to the exit point ranging from 5.5 to 27.7
°C (10 to 55°F), and preferably between 11.1 to 22.2 (20 to 40°F).
[0142] In one embodiment, the system may optionally comprise an in-line hydrotreater (not
shown) for treating the gaseous and volatile liquid fractions from the separation
zones. The in-line hydrotreater in one embodiment employs conventional hydrotreating
catalysts, is operated at a similarly high pressure (within 68.9 kPa (10 psig) in
one embodiment, and 344.8 kPa (50psig) in a second embodiment) as the rest of the
upgrade system, and capable of removing sulfur, Ni, V, and other impurities from the
upgraded products.
[0143] Figure 6 is a block diagram schematically illustrating another embodiment of an upgrade
system, wherein a solvent deasphalting unit is employed for pre-treating some, if
not all of the heavy oil feed to the system. The de-asphaltened oil (DAO) can be fed
directly to the contacting zone(s) or combined with a heavy oil feed stream as a feedstock.
In some embodiment, other hydrocarbon materials, e.g., VGO, can also be combined with
the heavy oil feed and / or the DAO as the feedstock for some of the contacting zone(s).
All of the fresh catalyst can be fed directly to the 1
st contacting zone in the system, or diverted to other contacting zone(s) in the series.
[0144] Figure 7 is a flow diagram of a heavy oil upgrade process with a fresh catalyst split
feed scheme, wherein some of the fresh catalyst feed is diverted from the first reactor
to other reactors in the process. As shown, the fresh catalyst feed is split amongst
the various contacting zones as feed streams 31, 32, and 33. Fresh catalyst feed 31
is combined with the recycle catalyst stream 17 and fed to the first contacting zone
as slurry catalyst feed 3. Hydrogen gas 2 and heavy oil feedstock 1 are combined with
slurry catalyst 3 as feed into the first contacting zone 10. In this embodiment, heavy
oil feedstock is preheated in furnace 80 before being introduced into the contacting
zone as heated oil feed 4.
[0145] Stream 5 comprising upgraded heavy oil feedstock exits the contacting zone 10 and
flows to a separation zone 40, wherein gases (including hydrogen) and volatile upgraded
products are separated from the non-volatile fractions 7 and removed overhead as stream
6. The non-volatile fractions stream 7 is sent to the next contacting zone 20 in series
for further upgrade. Stream 7 contains slurry catalyst in combination with unconverted
oil, and small amounts of coke and asphaltenes in some embodiments.
[0146] The upgrade process continues with the other contacting zones as shown, wherein stream
7 is combined with hydrogen feed 15 and fresh catalyst 32 as feed stream into contacting
zone 20. Although not shown, the streams can also be fed to the contacting zone in
separate conduits. Stream 8 comprising upgraded heavy oil feedstock flows to separation
zone 50, wherein upgrade products are combined with hydrogen and removed as overhead
product 9. Bottom stream 11 containing catalyst slurry, unconverted oil (plus small
amounts of coke and asphaltenes in some embodiments) is combined with a fresh catalyst
stream 33 and a fresh supply of hydrogen 16 as feed stream to the next contacting
zone 30. Stream 12 exits the contacting zone and flows to separation zone 60, wherein
upgraded products and hydrogen are removed overhead as stream 13. Some of the bottom
stream 17 from the separation zone, which contains catalyst slurry, unconverted oil
plus small amounts of coke and asphaltenes in some embodiments, is recycled back to
the 1
st contacting zone 10 as recycled stream 19. The rest of the bottom stream 17 is removed
as bleed-off stream 18 and sent to other processes in the system for catalyst de-oiling,
metal recovery, etc.,. Although not shown, vapor stream 14 containing the upgraded
products and hydrogen in one embodiment is subsequently processed in another part
of the system, e.g., in a high pressure separator and / or lean oil contactor.
[0147] Figure 8 illustrates another embodiment of the invention, wherein reactors having
internal separators are employed, thus separate hot separators / flash drums are not
necessary for phase separation. In this upgrade system, a reactor differential pressure
control system (not shown) is employed, regulating the product stream out of the top
of each reactor-separator. External pumps (not shown) may be employed to aid in the
dispersion of the slurry catalyst in the system and help control the temperature in
the system.
[0148] In the embodiment of Figure 8 as shown, all of fresh catalyst is diverted to the
2
nd and 3
rd contacting zones in the system. Recycled catalyst stream 19 provides slurry catalyst
feed to the first contacting zone, and optionally, to other contacting zone(s) in
the system. Also as shown, additional hydrocarbon oil feed, e.g., VGO, naphtha, in
an amount ranging from 2 to 30 wt. % of the heavy oil feed can be optionally added
as part of the feed stream to any of the contacting zones in the system.
[0149] Figure 9 illustrates an embodiment of the invention wherein all of the fresh catalyst
feed 99 is fed directly to the last contacting zone in the upgrade system, with other
contacting zone(s) in the system simply getting a portion of the recycled catalyst
stream 19.
[0150] Figure 10 illustrates is an embodiment of a heavy oil split feed scheme. As shown,
some of heavy oil feed is diverted from the 1
st reactor and fed directly to the 2
nd contacting zone in the system as heavy oil feed stream 42. Also as shown, recycled
catalyst is optionally sent to the 2
nd contacting zone in the system along with portions of the fresh catalyst as stream
32.
[0151] The following examples are given as non-limitative illustration of aspects of the
present invention.
[0152] Comparative Example 1: Heavy oil upgrade experiments were carried out in a pilot system having three gas-liquid
slurry phase reactors connected in series with three hot separators, each being connected
in series with the reactors. The upgrade system was run continuously for about 50
days.
[0153] A fresh slurry catalyst used was prepared according to the teaching of
US Patent No. 2006/0058174, i.e., a Mo compound was first mixed with aqueous ammonia forming an aqueous Mo compound
mixture, sulfided with hydrogen compound, promoted with a Ni compound, then transformed
in a hydrocarbon oil (other than heavy oil feedstock) at a temperature of at least
176.7°C (350°F) and a pressure of at least 1379 kPa (200 psig), forming an active
slurry catalyst to send to the first reactor.
[0154] The hydroprocessing conditions were as follows: a reactor temperature (in three reactors)
of about 825°F (440.5°C); a total pressure in the range of 16547.4 kPa to 17.926.4
Kpa (2400 to 2600 psig); a fresh Mo/ fresh heavy oil feed ratio (wt. %) 0.20 - 0.40;
fresh Mo catalyst /total Mo catalyst ratio 0.125 - 0.250; total feed LHSV about 0.070
to 0.15; and H
2 gas rate 7500 to 20000 SCF/ bbl (1335.7 to 3561.9 1./1.).
[0155] Effluent taken from each reactor was sent to the separator (connected in series),
and separated into a hot vapor stream and a non-volatile stream. Vapor streams were
removed from the top of the high pressure separators and collected for further analysis
("HPO" or high-pressure overhead streams). The non-volatile stream containing slurry
catalyst and unconverted heavy oil feedstock was removed from the separator and sent
to the next reactor in series.
[0156] A portion of the non-volatile stream from the last separator in an amount of 30 wt.
% of heavy oil feedstock was recycled (STB), and the rest was removed as a bleed stream
(in an amount of about 15 wt. % of the heavy oil feedstock). The STB stream contains
about 10 to 15 wt. % slurry catalyst.
[0157] The feed blend to the system was high metals heavy crude with the properties specified
in Table 1.
Table 1
|
VR feed |
API gravity at 60/60 |
- |
Specific gravity |
1.0760 |
Sulfur (wt %) |
5.27015 |
Nitrogen (ppm) |
7750 |
Nickel (ppm) |
135.25 |
Vanadium (ppm) |
682.15 |
Carbon (wt %) |
83.69 |
Hydrogen (wt %) |
9.12 |
H/C Ratio |
0.109 |
[0158] After 50 days of operation, the operation was shut down. The reactor, distributor
and internal thermowell were visually inspected. All three pieces show significant
built-up of deposit, with approximately 28.5% of the volume of the front-end (1
st) reactor being lost due to deposits of heavy metals. Analysis of the used slurry
catalyst in the bleed stream over the 50 day period showed an increasing deficit in
vanadium, suggesting that the deposit build up inside the front end reactor was not
only happening but actually worsening over the course of the run. The performance
of the process also suffered, due to the loss in the reaction volume.
[0159] Example 2: Example 1 was repeated, except that the temperature of the 1
st reactor was decreased 11.1 °C (20°F) from about 440.5 to 429.4°C (825°F to 805°F),
the recycled catalyst rate was increased from 30 wt. % (in Example 1) to about 40
wt. % of the heavy oil feed rate, and water was added to the front end reactor at
a rate equivalent to 5 wt. % of the heavy oil feed rate. The system ran for 54 days
before shutdown.
[0160] Water injection was carried out by adding water to the fresh catalyst, then the water
catalyst mixture was added to an autoclave along with the heavy oil feed and hydrogen,
with the mixture being pre-heated to a temperature of about 350°F (176.7°C).
[0161] Analysis of the used slurry catalyst in the bleed stream over the 54 day period showed
a fairly close agreement between the amount of vanadium expected to exit the process
and the amount of vanadium in the catalyst in the bleed stream, suggesting that vanadium
trapping has significantly reduced, thus heavy metal deposit in the equipment.
[0162] The analytical results were further confirmed by visual inspections of the reactor
internals, distributor, and internal thermowell. The equipment was significantly cleaner
in Example 2, with only 6.6% of the front end reactor volume being lost due to heavy
metal deposits.
[0163] Comparative Example 3: Heavy oil upgrade experiments were carried out in a pilot system having three gas-liquid
slurry phase reactors connected in series with two hot separators. The hot separators
are connected in series with the 1
st and 3
rd reactors respectively, with no hot separator following the 2
nd reactor. The gas-liquid slurry phase reactors were continuously stirred reactors.
The upgrade system was run continuously for about 70 days.
[0164] A fresh slurry catalyst used was prepared according to the teaching of
US Patent No. 2006/0058174, i.e., a Mo compound was first mixed with aqueous ammonia forming an aqueous Mo compound
mixture, sulfided with hydrogen/sulfur compound, promoted with a Ni compound, then
transformed in a hydrocarbon oil (other than heavy oil feedstock) at a temperature
of at least 176.6°C(350°F) and a pressure of at least 1379 kPa (200 psig), forming
an active slurry catalyst.
[0165] In Comparative Example 3, all of the fresh catalyst slurry was sent to the first
reactor in the system, for a concentration of fresh slurry catalyst in heavy oil ranging
from 2,000 to 5,000 ppm, expressed as weight of metal (molybdenum) to weight of heavy
oil feed. The hydroprocessing conditions were as follows: a reactor temperature of
435 - 440.5 °C (815 - 825°F); a total pressure in the range of 16547.4 to 17926.4
kPa (2400 to 2600 psig); a fresh Mo/ fresh heavy oil feed ratio (wt. %) 0.20 - 0.40;
fresh Mo catalyst /total Mo catalyst ratio 0.1; total feed LHSV 0.10 to 0.15; and
H
2 gas rate 1780.9 to 2671.4 1./1. (10000 to 15000 SCF/bbl).
[0166] Effluent taken from the 1
st and 3
rd reactors was introduced into the hot separators connected in series with the reactors,
and separated into a hot vapor stream and a non-volatile stream. Vapor streams were
removed from the top of the high pressure separators and collected for further analysis
("HPO" or high-pressure overhead streams). The non-volatile stream containing slurry
catalyst and unconverted heavy oil feedstock was removed from the bottom of the 1
st separator and sent to the 2
nd reactor in series. Effluent from the 2
nd reactor was sent directly to the 3
rd reactor as feedstock.
[0167] A portion of the non-volatile stream from the last separator in an amount of 5 -
15 wt. % of heavy oil feedstock was removed as the bleed-off stream, for an overall
conversion rate of 98 to 98.5% of heavy oil feed to distillate products. The rest
of the non-volatile stream, the "Stripper Bottoms product" or STB, containing the
bulk of the catalyst (in an amount of 80 to 95% of total slurry catalyst entering
the system) was recycled back to the first reactor for maintaining the flow of catalyst
through the upgrade system. The STB stream contains about 7 to 20 wt% slurry catalyst.
The STB was also analyzed to evaluate the overall performance of the system.
[0168] The feed blend to the system was a heavy oil feed with the properties specified in
Table 2.
Table 2
|
VR Properties |
API gravity at 60/60 |
4.6 |
Specific gravity |
1.04 |
Sulfur (wt %) |
1.48 |
Nitrogen (ppm) |
11069 |
Nickel (ppm) |
118.8 |
Vanadium (ppm) |
108.7 |
Carbon (wt %) |
83.57 |
Hydrogen (wt %) |
10.04 |
MCR (wt %) |
20.7 |
Viscosity @ 100°C. (cSt) |
20796 |
Pentane Asphaltenes (wt %) |
13.9 |
Fraction Boiling above 1000°F (537.8°C) in wt% 100% |
[0169] Example 4: After 70 days with all of the fresh catalyst to the 1
st reactor (in Comparative Example 3), the location of fresh catalyst supply was shifted
from the 1
st to the 3
rd reactor, with the first two reactors relying entirely on recycled catalyst feed stream
for 28 days. All other process conditions remained the same. HPO and STB products
were collected, analyzed, and compared with the results of Comparative Example 3.
There was no significant change in HPO product quality With respect to the STB product,
the results are as follows:
Table 3
STB Product properties |
Comparative Example 3 |
Example 4 |
Wt %VR (BP 537.8°C=1000°F) |
|
|
|
15.9 |
15.3 |
Wt % HVGO (BP 426.7°C=800°F) |
|
|
|
49.8 |
48.6 |
Wt % VGO (BP 343.3°C=650°F) |
|
|
|
79.8 |
80.0 |
API |
2.7 |
4.5 |
Sulfur (wt. %) |
0.12 |
0.16 |
Nitrogen (ppm) |
12711 |
12335 |
MCR (wt. %) |
14.7 |
12.4 |
Hydrogen / Carbon ratio |
0.098 |
0.102 |
Ni (ppm) |
10.8 |
7.9 |
Hot heptane asphaltenes, ppm |
174255 |
119713 |
Viscosity @70°C, cSt |
68.4 |
47.3 |
[0170] The results show that diverting the fresh catalyst to the last contacting zone in
the system did not trigger changes in product nitrogen levels. However, there was
a change in the sulfur level, which could be due to the unusually low sulfur level
in the heavy oil feed to the system and the high sulfur level in the VGO oil used
in the slurry catalyst feed. It is therefore possible that injecting the fresh catalyst
into the last reactor penalized the product sulfur by providing less time for the
VGO oil carrier (in the slurry catalyst) to react, resulting into a higher product
sulfur level. It is further noted that by diverting the fresh catalyst to the last
reactor yielded a STB product with improved properties, including API, viscosity,
MCR, HHA, nickel, and H/C ratio. The improvement in STB product API did not correlate
with an improvement in the distillation of the STB product. In other words, the STB
product API did not improve due to additional cracking in a lighter product distillation,
but due to improved catalytic activity, resulting into a higher H/C ratio.
[0171] With respect to the system operation in the 28-day run, there was no evidence of
pressure-drop buildup or plugging around the front end reactors to suggest any coking
or solid build-ups. There was no measurable negative impact on the overall conversion
rate. The results suggest the used catalyst has retained sufficient hydrogenation
activity to starve off coking, even in the presence of fresh / untreated heavy oil
feedstock, indicating that a fresh catalyst split scheme still suppresses coking adequately.
[0172] Example 5: Comparative Example 3 is repeated except that 20% of the heavy oil feedstock is
diverted from the 1
st reactor to the 3
rd reactor while other process conditions remain the same.
[0173] In comparing process stability, reactor performance, and reactor conditions between
the examples, it is believed that in Comparative Example 3, the 3
rd reactor has a lower liquid throughput (with no heavy oil feed) and higher catalyst
concentration which are directionally beneficial for conversion purposes. However,
these conditions also tend to make the last reactor more susceptible to operation
upsets leading to insufficient liquid flow-through, and consequentially, more solids
build-up, degrading thermometry and shortening of the process run-time.
[0174] In Example 5 with a portion of the heavy oil feedstock being fed directly to the
last reactor, it is anticipated that the preceding reactors (1
st and 2
nd) with a decrease in liquid throughput (as a portion of the heavy oil feedstock is
diverted) and a corresponding increase in catalyst concentration will operate more
efficiently and with a higher conversion rate. Additionally, with more liquid dilution
in the 3
rd reactor, there is a more uniform catalyst concentration profile across all three
reactors.
[0175] It is further anticipated that as the last reactor in the series gets a portion of
the heavy oil feed, dry conditions associated with insufficient liquid flow is obviated.
As the last reactor is protected from over-conversion events or dry conditions, there
is less solid build-up or coke deposition. It is also expected that the last reactor
is less susceptible to operation upsets, e.g., wide swings in temperature, pressure,
flows, etc.
[0176] For the purpose of this specification and appended claims, unless otherwise indicated,
all numbers expressing quantities, percentages or proportions, and other numerical
values used in the specification and claims, are to be understood as being modified
in all instances by the term "about." Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary,
the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims
are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be
obtained and / or the precision of an instrument for measuring the value, thus including
the standard deviation of error for the device or method being employed to determine
the value. The use of the term "or" in the claims is used to mean "and/or" unless
explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or the alternative are mutually
exclusive, although the disclosure supports a definition that refers to only alternatives
and "and/or." The use of the word "a" or "an" when used in conjunction with the term
"comprising" in the claims and/or the specification may mean "one," but it is also
consistent with the meaning of "one or more," "at least one," and "one or more than
one." Furthermore, all ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the endpoints and
are independently combinable. In general, unless otherwise indicated, singular elements
may be in the plural and vice versa with no loss of generality. As used herein, the
term "include" and its grammatical variants are intended to be non-limiting, such
that recitation of items in a list is not to the exclusion of other like items that
can be substituted or added to the listed items.
[0177] It is contemplated that any aspect of the invention discussed in the context of one
embodiment of the invention may be implemented or applied with respect to any other
embodiment of the invention. Likewise, any composition of the invention may be the
result or may be used in any method or process of the invention. This written description
uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable
any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. The patentable scope
is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled
in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims
if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the
claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences
from the literal languages of the claims. All citations referred herein are expressly
incorporated herein by reference.